Iran is expanding its sphere of influence. Iranian T-72 tanks in Iraq

23


Iraq’s struggle with Islamic state militants is not only the struggle of the Iraqi armed forces and the Kurdish Peshmerga, but also the struggle of an increasing number of Shiite militias, most of whom receive substantial support from Iran. The Iraqi equivalent of the Lebanese Hezbollah movement, called Kataib Hezbollah, is without a doubt the most powerful and most influential of all Shiite militias currently present in Iraq. This is mainly due to Iranian financial assistance, the supply of lethal weapons and the presence of Iranian advisers in the field.

Iran has provided these Shiite militias with various weaponsManufactured in Iran, 12,7-mm sniper rifles AM.50, 40-mm grenade launchers Nasir, jeeps armed Safir 107-mm multiply launchers, recoilless rifles and even 122-mm multiple rocket launchers HM-20. The number and type of weapons supplied depended on the number of detachments of these militias and their number.

However, rumors that militias in Iraq have Iranian Tankshave not yet been confirmed. These rumors quickly spread around the world every time when some traces of a tank transporter were found passing near the western border of Iran. Now, finally, there is evidence of the existence of Iranian tanks in Iraq, which joined the fight against the Islamic state.


In the photo above, the tank takes out fighters from the city of Tikrit. This is the Iranian T-72C, which can be clearly distinguished from the Iraqi tanks T-72 Ural and T-72M1 due to the presence of 155 attachment points for Dynamic Protection (DZ) Contact-1, as well as on smoke grenade launchers on the sides of the tower in contrast from the tank T-72M1, whose installations are located in front of the tower. Surprisingly, all DZ blocks are missing on this sample.

Some "experts" could say that this single T-72С tank may be part of a non-advertised deal recently concluded between Iraq and Russia, but the Iranian camouflage pattern on the tank leaves no doubt about its origin. For comparison, the Iranian tank T-72С (with DZ blocks) during the parade in the photo below.


At present, it is not known whether the T-72 tank taken off near Tikrit is part of Kataib Hezbollah’s arsenal, or is actually in service with the Iraqi army. It is known that Kataib Hezbollah has only one tank M1 Abrams, which was abandoned by the Iraqi army. Thus, this organization does not have fire support with heavy weapons, which is very important for close combat in cities such as Tikrit, for example. From this point of view, Iran, which supplies a limited number of T-72 tanks from the warehouses of the Iranian army and the Revolutionary Guard, is completely logical.

Regardless of the impact that tanks may have on the further course of military operations, it is clear that Iran’s influence on conflicts in the Middle East and other areas should not be underestimated. Currently, Iran is using its defense industry to increase influence in many Middle Eastern countries, starting with Iraq, Syria and Yemen and ending with Libya. Therefore, his intention to expand the sphere of influence becomes even clearer and definitely Iran should not be underestimated when developing political steps in the Middle East.


More photo testimonies have recently appeared showing the presence of Iranian tanks in Iraq. In the new photographs, allegedly the same T-72C tank, which was seen near Tikrit, this time it was shot in the city of Samarra, located south of Tikrit. New pictures appeared immediately the next day after the Iranian tank T-72С was seen in Iraq.

The T-72C tank was tested by Kassem Al-Araji (standing in the middle), with the right hand of the head of the Badr organization. On the question of who should first of all help Iraq in its fight against the Islamic state, Kassem Al-Araji said earlier that “in our fight against the Islamic state we want help from Iran, not the US” and that Iran played “the main role in supporting our armed forces. "

This support now undoubtedly also includes the transfer of Iranian T-72C tanks. At least one of them drove into the city of Samarra on a tank trailer of the Iraqi army, accompanied by fighters from the Badr organization.


But in contrast to what was previously supposed, this tank is in service with the Iraqi army, not the Badr organizations or Kataib Hezbollah, which have the greatest influence of all the numerous Shiite groups fighting in Iraq. A source in the Badr organization close to Kassem al-Araji said that “Badr does not have a mechanized unit. The tanks are operated by Iraqi ISF security forces, but their crews can sympathize with our Badr organization. ”

Since the T-72C is more modern than the old T-72 Ural and T-72M1, it seems likely that the Iraqi military was trained in T-72С tanks in Iran, which is another indication of the strong ties between the two countries.



Materials used:
www.spioenkop.blogspot.ru
www.ru.wikipedia.org
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    23 March 2015 07: 13
    handsome men! Igil is not going to be sweet now !! It’s not clear why some tanks without DZ
    1. -1
      23 March 2015 07: 29
      Quote: Mayer1980
      Isil is not going to be sweet now!

      And before that, the Assad did not try their tanks? request
      1. +4
        23 March 2015 09: 02
        Assad in Syria is fighting.
      2. -1
        23 March 2015 11: 59
        For all my dislike of the professor’s communication style, he is right. Assad has a significant superiority in tanks and armor, like the Iraqi army, but the Syrian and Iraqi armies do not control half of their countries. Crucial in this war is for trained and morally stable infantry with the support of artillery, and not for tanks.
        1. +4
          23 March 2015 13: 19
          Quote: g1v2
          Assad has a significant superiority in tanks and armor, like the Iraqi army, but the Syrian and Iraqi armies do not control half of their countries.

          All the same, here you are somewhat wrong if it were not for the support of terrorist gangs by their sponsors from the USA, Israel, the EU and the PZ monarchies, these fanatics would have been killed long ago.
          And about country control, see a map of these countries. Yes, it seems that control over the territory of various gangs is big, but in fact, in its mass it is a desert in which disparate Bedouin tribes live.
          Yesterday, I already laid out this film with a fairly objective situation in these countries, but I'll post it for those who have not seen it. And then to judge the processes taking place there according to the professor is simply ridiculous.

          You just need to understand that everything that is happening in the region is not just a clash between Sunnis and Shiites, it is a war of "good versus evil", and "evil" here is personified by the United States, Israel, and also the Wahhabis of SA.
          1. +1
            24 March 2015 00: 12
            Quote: quilted jacket
            If it were not for the support of terrorist gangs by their sponsors from the USA, Israel, the EU and the PZ monarchies, these fanatics would have been killed long ago.

            Of course, if there weren’t the USA, etc., then Syria and Iran would have put order in the BV without the help of Russia or China — they would deal with the bearded Islamists and at the same time would solve the issue with the Saudi obscurantists
    2. +5
      23 March 2015 08: 59
      I also wonder why the Iranians dismantled dynamic protection blocks from their T-72S.
    3. +4
      23 March 2015 10: 21
      That's what amused New pictures appeared immediately the day after the Iranian T-72C tank was spotted in Iraq.
      and in the ruin for six months, the great Ukrainians cannot provide any reliable evidence .. they can’t see the cameras or can’t shoot lol
      1. Tajik arian
        0
        23 March 2015 22: 21
        EHH, grandfather of ayatollah ... how far are you from the bought but powerful shah ... if it weren’t for yours, well, a morally good revolution, then Iran would now be the third superpower. although you are already starting to gain momentum ... we'll see. In the meantime:

        1960-1970 not only appear in the foreign policy of the Shah pro-imperialistbut imperialist features supported by the rapid growth of Iran’s military potential (military spending grew 1970 times over the 20s), plans to establish Iran’s control over The "kerosene barrel" of the planet - the Persian Gulf, which would put the world capitalist economy in a certain dependence on Tehran. Having created the world's strongest hovercraft fleet, the most advanced air defense missile system in the third world, surpassing all NATO members except the United States in the air force and helicopter fleet, Iran sought overwhelming control of the world's most important oil transportation artery - the Strait of Hormuz. Seeking to be present on the other side of the Strait, the Shah intervened in the internal conflict in Oman and sent his troops against the partisan movement in this Sultanate. Tehran has developed tense relations with other Arab states. The Shah made great efforts to maintain friendly relations with Pakistan and Afghanistan, as he feared the separatism of the Baloch.
        The Shah crowns Empress Farah at the coronation ceremony in 1967.

        On December 1, 1971, after the withdrawal of British troops from the Persian Gulf and the formation of the United Arab Emirates, Iranian troops occupied three islands in the Strait of Hormuz: Abu Musa, Tombe Bozorg and Tombe Kuchek under the pretext that these islands were Iranian territory before the arrival of the British (English Iranian negotiations and protests of some Arab countries on this issue continued until October 1972).

        Shah supported the monarchy of the Persian Gulf. During the civil war in Yemen (1962 - 1970), Iran supported the monarchists. A similar policy was pursued in Oman, where an expeditionary force was sent in 1973, which played an important role in suppressing the anti-monarchist guerrilla movement there in the province of Dofar.

        The Shah maintained friendly relations with the Soviet Union. Mohammed Reza visited the USSR three times in 1956, 1965 and 1972.

        In 1963, 1966 and 1972, agreements were signed between the USSR and Iran on cooperation in the economic and technical sphere, the construction of various industrial facilities, etc.

        Mohammed Reza was the first Muslim leader to establish diplomatic relations with Israel, which used the radical Muslim clergy to criticize the Shah as "an accomplice in Zionist politics."

        Sufficiently tense relations continued with Iraq. In 1975, an Algerian agreement was signed with Saddam Hussein. The conflict, however, turned into an open war only after the overthrow of the Shah, when the revolution and repression weakened the Iranian army so much that Saddam Hussein decided to attack Iran.
  2. +6
    23 March 2015 08: 11
    The Americans have wreaked havoc in Iraq, and now "bad" Iran is dealing with the consequences of "democracy."
    1. +2
      23 March 2015 20: 17
      Quote: 0255
      Iran deals with the consequences of "democracy"

      Nothing fundamentally new - the Persians have always been at odds with the Arabs. Today, taking advantage of the situation in the Arab world, when the state. structures and everyone is fighting against everyone, the Iranians are trying to spread their influence in the region. They are not original in this endeavor, the Turks also dream of the former greatness of the Ottoman Empire. In reality, neither one nor the other has enough puffs to crush the entire BV. But Turkey still has a decent army, formed by NATO standards and equipped with modern weapons, and the Persians only puff up to show everyone how cool they are. Oh, apparently, Bodalovo Ankara - Tehran is brewing there.
  3. +2
    23 March 2015 08: 22
    as I understand it, instead of the Sunni caliphate, will the Iranians try to create a Shiite caliphate? it turns out horseradish radish is not sweeter considering that Iran is Iran - the Islamic Republic of Iran.
    1. +1
      23 March 2015 09: 00
      Iran is a secular state. This is the official position of management.
      1. +4
        23 March 2015 10: 25
        Iran is a secular state. This is the official position of the leadership. [/ Quote]

        The leadership of Iran, under the 1979 constitution, which declared the country an Islamic republic, is led by an ayatollah or supreme leader, who is also the supreme commander.
        The President of the country is the second most important official and head of the executive branch ...
        Secular state headed by ayatollah what
      2. +2
        23 March 2015 11: 39
        Quote: Firstvanguard
        Iran is a secular state. This is the official position of management.

        Cool, political science news. Is it so secular?
      3. +2
        24 March 2015 00: 15
        Quote: Firstvanguard
        Iran is a secular state. This is the official position of management.

        That's right - Iran is a secular state

        And the elections, and they and so on - met at work - ordinary normal people

        Iran, in fact, is our common ally - and the enemies are Saudis obscurantists - medieval religious fanatics and their bandits bearded - with whom just Iran and Syria are fighting
        1. 0
          24 March 2015 09: 56
          Quote: Talgat
          That's right - Iran is a secular state


          Why is it living according to the laws of Sharia. lol
      4. +1
        24 March 2015 00: 19
        Iran conducts an active foreign policy in 2 directions

        1. It strengthens friendly relations and cooperation with the CSTO countries (primarily with the Russian Federation and the KZ), the EAEU, SCO and ALBA and tries to join these organizations in every possible way - moreover, as if he had already entered into ALBA together with Syria - it’s a pity Cuba and Venezuela are far away - therefore they are more interested in the EAEU and the SCO, and ideally the CST

        2. Systematically waging a cold war (turning into a hot one) with the Saudi Cathars of the United States and Israel - indeed surrounds the Saudis with a ring of allies - Yemen Syria Iraq
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +3
      23 March 2015 10: 46
      The Islamic Republic is at war with the Islamic state, Shiite fanatics are at war with Sunni fanatics, some are chopping heads, others are hanging ... The same eggs are on the left. request
    4. +1
      23 March 2015 13: 25
      Quote: Semurg
      as I understand it, instead of the Sunni caliphate, will the Iranians try to create a Shiite caliphate? it turns out horseradish radish is not sweeter considering that Iran is Iran - the Islamic Republic of Iran.

      Funny.
      Here is the new-old Prime Minister of Israel Netanyahu seeks to create a state exclusively of Jews - should one be afraid too?
      Suddenly they decide to spread their religion to the whole world? lol
  4. +4
    23 March 2015 09: 22
    That's cooler, the pro-Iranian abrams of the Kataib Hazbol armored squad are fighting in the center of Tikrit.
    1. 0
      23 March 2015 10: 18
      I think that our special services would give heels t72 for an exchange for one "Abrams", and a bonus of some other ...
      1. +1
        23 March 2015 10: 30
        Do you think our special services missed such a chance to get the M1A2 "Abrasha"? wink
      2. +4
        23 March 2015 10: 40
        Dear, the Abrams in Iraq are not new and their "secrets" have long been known, but the fact that Iran is more and more involved in the war with ISIS is both good and bad, because it is the only force (financial, economic) that really helps Iraq, also the opportunity to test their technique and tactics, it's bad because this is what the United States wanted, we need to help both Iran and Iraq and learn from the media
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. 0
            23 March 2015 13: 37
            By the way, for some reason, Iran has equipped the Iraqi Kataib Hezbollah (read Lebanese Hezbollah) with QW-11 (Misagh-1) MANPADS.
            Apparently, the IG has its own aviation smile

            And how can you not recall recent news:
            Iraq's air defense shot down two British aircraft with weapons for ISIS
            The Iraqi army shot down two British aircraft, which parachuted weapons for ISIL terrorists in Al Anbar province. This was reported by the Fars Iranian agency, a senior adviser to the Iraqi Ministry of Defense said.
            He said the Iraqi parliament asked London for clarification in this regard.
            http://warfiles.ru/show-81741-pvo-iraka-sbila-dva-britanskih-samoleta-s-oruzhiem
            -dlya-igil.html
  5. kelevra
    0
    25 March 2015 14: 36
    They made a battlefield out of Iraq, now it’s not a country, but a huge TIR! And it’s not surprising that Saudi tanks, or somebody else’s, will appear there soon!