Cossacks in the Civil War. Part I. 1918 year. The origin of the white movement

101
The reasons why the Cossacks of all the Cossack regions for the most part rejected the destructive ideas of Bolshevism and entered into an open struggle against them, moreover under unequal conditions, are not completely clear until now and constitute a riddle for many historians. After all, the Cossacks in the everyday respect were the same farmers, as 75% of the Russian population, carried the same state, if not more, and were under the same administrative control of the state. Since the beginning of the revolution, which occurred after the abdication of the sovereign, the Cossacks within the regions and in the front-line units experienced various psychological stages. During the February rebel movement in Petrograd, the Cossacks took a neutral position and remained outsiders of the unfolding events. The Cossacks saw that in the presence of significant armed forces in Petrograd, the government not only does not use them, but also strictly prohibits their use against the rebels. During the previous insurrection in 1905-1906, the Cossack troops were the main armed force that restored order in the country, and as a result, public opinion earned the scornful title of "gunmen" and "royal satraps and guardsmen". Therefore, in the mutiny in the Russian capital, the Cossacks were inert and left the government to solve the problem of restoring order by the forces of other troops. After the abdication of the sovereign and the entry into government of the Provisional Government, the Cossacks considered the continuity of power to be legal and were ready to support the new government. But gradually this attitude changed, and, observing the complete inactivity of the authorities and even encouraging unbridled revolutionary excesses, the Cossacks began to gradually move away from the destructive power, and the instructions of the Council of Cossack troops operating in Petrograd under the chairmanship of the ataman of the Orenburg Dutov army became authoritative for them.

Inside the Cossack regions, the Cossacks were also not drunk from revolutionary freedoms and, making some local changes, continued to live as before, without making any economic or social upheavals. At the front in the military units, the order for the army, completely changing the bases of the military order, was taken with bewilderment by the Cossacks and continued to maintain order and discipline in the new conditions, most often electing their former commanders and chiefs. There were no refusals in the execution of orders and personal accounts with the commanding staff also did not occur. But the tension gradually increased. The population of the Cossack regions and the Cossack units at the front were subjected to active revolutionary propaganda, which unwittingly had to reflect on their psychology and made them listen carefully to the calls and demands of the revolutionary leaders. In the area of ​​the Don Cossacks, one of the most important revolutionary acts was the dismissal of the ataman Count Grabbe, his replacement by an elected ataman of Cossack origin, General Kaledin, and the restoration of the convocation of public representatives to the Military Circle, according to custom that had existed since antiquity, before the reign of Emperor Peter I. continued to go without much shock. There was an acute question of relations with the non-Kazach population, which, psychologically, proceeded along the same revolutionary paths as the population of the rest of Russia. At the front, among the Cossack military units, powerful propaganda was conducted, accusing ataman Kaledin of counter-revolutionism and having a certain success among the Cossacks. The seizure of power by the Bolsheviks in Petrograd was accompanied by a decree addressed to the Cossacks, in which only geographical names changed, and it was promised that the Cossacks would be freed from the burden of generals and the severity of military service and equality and democratic freedoms would be established in everything. The Cossacks had nothing against it.

Cossacks in the Civil War. Part I. 1918 year. The origin of the white movement
Fig. 1 Region of the Don Cossacks


The Bolsheviks came to power under anti-war slogans and soon began to fulfill their promises. In November 1917, the Council of People's Commissars invited all the belligerent countries to begin peace negotiations, but the Entente countries refused. Then Ulyanov sent a delegation to Brest-Litovsk occupied by the Germans, for separate peace talks with the delegates of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey and Bulgaria. The ultimate demands of Germany shocked the delegates and caused hesitation even among the Bolsheviks, who were not particularly patriotic, but Ulyanov accepted these conditions. The "obscene Brest Peace" was concluded, according to which Russia lost about 1 million km² of territory, pledged to demobilize the army and navy, transfer ships and infrastructure of the Black Sea to Germany fleetpay indemnity in the amount of 6 billion marks, recognize the independence of Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Finland. The hands of the Germans to continue the war in the west were untied. In early March, the German army on the whole front began to advance for the occupation of territories given by the Bolsheviks under a peace treaty. Moreover, in addition to the agreement, Germany announced to Ulyanov that Ukraine should be considered a province of Germany, to which Ulyanov also agreed. There is a fact in this matter that is not widely known. The diplomatic defeat of Russia in Brest-Litovsk was caused not only by corruption, inconsistency and adventurism of the Petrograd negotiators. The joker played a key role here. A new partner suddenly appeared in the group of contracting parties - the Ukrainian Central Council, which, with all the precariousness of its position, signed a separate peace treaty with Germany in Brest-Litovsk on February 9 (January 27), 1918. The next day, the Soviet delegation with the slogan "stop the war, but do not sign peace," interrupted the negotiations. In response, on February 18, German troops launched an offensive along the entire front line. At the same time, the German-Austrian side tightened peace. In view of the complete inability of the Sovietized old army and the beginnings of the Red Army to withstand even the limited German offensive and the need for respite to strengthen the Bolshevik regime, Russia also signed the Brest Peace Treaty on March 3. After that, the “independent” Ukraine was occupied by the Germans and, as unnecessary, they threw Petlyura “off the throne”, placing the puppet hetman Skoropadsky on it. Thus, shortly before sunk into oblivion, the Second Reich, under the leadership of Kaiser Wilhelm II, captured Ukraine and Crimea.

After the Bolsheviks concluded the Brest Peace, part of the territory of the Russian Empire turned into zones of occupation of the Central countries. Austro-German troops occupied Finland, the Baltic States, Belarus, Ukraine and eliminated the Soviets there. The Allies kept a sharp eye on what was happening in Russia and also tried to ensure their interests, connecting them with the former Russia. In addition, there were up to two million prisoners in Russia who, with the consent of the Bolsheviks, were sent to their countries, and for the Entente powers, it was important to prevent the return of prisoners of war to Germany and Austria-Hungary. For the connection of Russia with allies, ports served in the north of Murmansk and Arkhangelsk, in the Far East of Vladivostok. In these ports were concentrated large warehouses of property and military equipment, delivered on the orders of the Russian government by foreigners. Accumulated cargo was over a million tons worth up to 2 and a half billion rubles. The cargo was shamelessly stolen, including by local revkomi. To ensure the safety of goods, these ports were gradually occupied by the Allies. Since orders imported from England, France and Italy were sent through the northern ports, they were occupied by parts of the British in 12 Ltd. and the allies in 11 LLC man. Imports from the United States and Japan went through Vladivostok. 6 July 1918, the Entente declared Vladivostok an international zone, and the city was occupied by parts of Japan at 57 Ltd. and other allies at 13 000 people. But they did not overthrow the Bolshevik power. On July 29 alone, the power of the Bolsheviks in Vladivostok was overthrown by the White Czechs under the leadership of the Russian General MK Diterikhs.

In the internal policy, the Bolsheviks issued decrees that destroyed all social structures: banks, national industry, private property, land ownership, and often national looting under the guise of nationalization was carried out without any government leadership. The country began the inevitable devastation in which the Bolsheviks blamed the bourgeoisie and the "rotten intellectuals", and these classes were subjected to brutal terror, bordering on destruction. Until now, it is impossible to fully understand how this all-destructive force came to power in Russia, given that power was seized in a country that had a thousand-year history and culture. After all, by the same measures, the international destructive forces hoped to produce an internal explosion in fermenting France, transferring up to 10 million francs to French banks for this purpose. But France, by the beginning of the twentieth century, had already exhausted its limit on the revolution and was tired of them. Unfortunately for the revolutionaries, there were forces in the country that were able to unravel the insidious and far-reaching plans of the leaders of the proletariat and resist them. About this in the Military Review was written in more detail in the article "How America saved Western Europe from the ghost of the world revolution."

One of the main reasons for allowing the Bolsheviks to carry out a coup d'etat and then quickly seize power in many areas and cities of the Russian Empire was the support of numerous reserve and training battalions who did not want to go to the front. It was Lenin’s promise of an immediate end to the war with Germany that predetermined the transition of the Russian army, which had decayed during the “Kerenzchyna” to the side of the Bolsheviks, which ensured their victory. In most parts of the country, the establishment of the Bolshevik government passed quickly and peacefully: from 84 provincial and other major cities only fifteen Soviet power was established as a result of armed struggle. By adopting the “Decree on Peace” on the second day of their presidency, the Bolsheviks ensured the “triumphal march of Soviet power” throughout Russia from October 1917 to February 1918.

The relations of the Cossacks and the rulers of the Bolsheviks were determined by the decrees of the Union of Cossack troops and the Soviet government. 22 November 1917, the Cossack Forces Union submitted a decree in which it informed the Soviet government that:
- The Cossacks are not looking for anything for themselves and do not require anything outside of their regions. But, being guided by the democratic principles of self-determination of the nationalities, it will not tolerate on its territories any other authority than the national one, formed by the free agreement of the local nationalities without any external or external influence.
- Sending punitive units against Cossack areas, in particular against the Don, will bring civil war to the outskirts, where energetic work is underway to establish public order. This will cause a breakdown of transport, will be an obstacle to the delivery of goods, coal, oil and steel to the cities of Russia and worsen the food business, disrupting the breadbasket of Russia.
- The Cossacks oppose any introduction of foreign troops in the Cossack regions without the consent of the military and regional Cossack governments.
In response to the peace declaration of the Union of Cossack troops, the Bolsheviks issued a decree to open military operations against the south, which read:
- Relying on the Black Sea Fleet, carry out the armament and organization of the Red Guard to occupy the Donetsk coal region.
- From the north, from the headquarters of the Commander-in-Chief, move squadrons south to the starting points: Gomel, Bryansk, Kharkov, Voronezh.
- The most active parts to move from the Zhmerinka area to the east for the occupation of Donbass.

This decree created the germ of the fratricidal civil war of Soviet power against the Cossack regions. For the existence of the Bolsheviks badly needed were Caucasian oil, Donetsk coal and bread of the southern suburbs. The mass famine that had begun was pushing Soviet Russia toward the rich south. At the disposal of the Don and Kuban governments, there were no well-organized and sufficient forces to protect the areas. The units returning from the front did not want to fight, sought to disperse from the villages, and the young Cossacks-front-line soldiers entered into an open struggle with the elderly. In many villages this struggle acquired a fierce character, the massacres on both sides were brutal. But the Cossacks who came from the front were many, they were well armed and the tombs, had combat experience, and in most of the villages the victory was left to the front-line youth strongly infected by Bolshevism. It soon became clear that in the Cossack regions strong parts can only be created on the basis of volunteering. To maintain order on the Don and Kuban, their governments used detachments consisting of volunteers: students, cadets, cadets and young people. Many Cossack officers volunteered to form such volunteer units (among the Cossacks they are called partisan), but in the headquarters this business was not well organized. Permission for the formation of such detachments was given to almost everyone who asked. There were many adventurers, even brigands, who simply robbed the population for the purpose of profit. However, the main threat to the Cossack areas turned out to be the regiments returning from the front, as many of those who returned were contaminated by Bolshevism. The formation of volunteer red Cossack units also began immediately after the Bolsheviks came to power. At the end of November 1917, at a meeting of representatives of the Cossack units of the Petrograd Military District, it was decided to create revolutionary detachments from the Cossacks of the 5 Cossack Division, 1, 4 and 14 of the Don regiments and send them to the Don, Kuban and Terek to defeat the counter-revolution and establish the Soviet authorities. In January, 1918, in the village of Kamenskaya, convened a congress of front-line Cossacks with the participation of delegates from 46 Cossack regiments. The congress recognized Soviet power and created Donvoenrevkom, declaring the Don General’s A.D. Kaledin, speaking against the Bolsheviks. Among the commanders of the Don Cossacks, the supporters of Bolshevik ideas were two head officers, troop officers Golubov and Mironov, and Golubov’s closest associate was Podorunkov. In January, 1918 of the Don Cossack Regiment returned to the Don from the Romanian Front. Having elected troop foreman F.K. Mironov, the regiment supported the establishment of Soviet power, and decided not to go home until the counter-revolution led by ataman Kaledin was defeated. But Golubov played the most tragic role on the Don. In February, he occupied Novocherkassk with two regiments of the Cossacks propagating them, dispersed the Military Circle meeting, arrested General Nazarov, the Ataman of the Army who had taken office after his death, and shot him. After a short time, this “hero” of the revolution was shot by the Cossacks right at the rally, and Podtyolkov, who had large sums of money with him, was captured by the Cossacks and was hanged by their sentence. The fate of Mironov was also tragic. He managed to entice a significant number of Cossacks, with whom he fought on the side of the Reds, but, not being satisfied with their order, he decided to go over to the side of the fighting Don with the Cossacks. Mironov was arrested in red, sent to Moscow, where he was shot. But it will be then. In the meantime, Don was a great turmoil. If the Cossack population still hesitated, and only in a part of the stanitsas the sensible voice of the old men took advantage, then the non-Kazach population completely sided with the Bolsheviks. Non-resident population in the Cossack regions always envied the Cossacks, who owned a large amount of land.

Other armed forces in the south were detachments of the formed Volunteer Army located in Rostov. 2 November 1917, General Alekseev arrived at the Don, entered into contact with Ataman Kaledin and asked him for permission to form volunteer groups on the Don. The purpose of General Alekseev was to use the southeastern base of the armed forces in order to assemble the remaining stalwart officers, junkers, old soldiers and organize an army of them necessary for establishing order in Russia. Despite the complete lack of funds, Alekseev ardently set to work. On Barochnaya Street, the premises of one of the hospitals were turned into an officer's hostel, which became the cradle of volunteering. Soon the first donation was received, 400 rubles. This is all that in November, the Russian society singled out its defenders. But people were just going to the Don, having no idea what awaits them, gropingly, in darkness, through the continuous Bolshevik sea. They walked to the place where the centuries-old traditions of Cossack freemen and the names of the leaders whom popular rumor associated with Don served as a bright beacon. They came exhausted, hungry, ragged, but not lost in spirit. December 6 (19), disguised as a peasant, arrived on the railway to Don General Kornilov with a false passport. He wanted to go further to the Volga, and from there to Siberia. He considered it more correct that General Alekseev remained in the south of Russia, and he would be given the opportunity to work in Siberia. He argued that in this case they would not interfere with each other and he would manage to organize a big deal in Siberia. He rushed into the open. But representatives of the National Center who came to Novocherkassk from Moscow insisted that Kornilov stay in the south of Russia and work together with Kaledin and Alekseev. An agreement was concluded between them, according to which General Alekseev assumed responsibility for all financial and political issues, General Kornilov assumed the organization and command of the Volunteer Army, General Kaledin continued the formation of the Don Army and the management of the affairs of the Don Army. Kornilov had little faith in the success of his work in the south of Russia, where he would have to create a white case in the territories of Cossack troops and depend on military atamans. He said this: “I know Siberia, I believe in Siberia, it is possible to put business there widely. Here, Alekseev alone can easily cope with the case. ” With all his heart and soul, Kornilov rushed to Siberia, wanted him to be released and treated the work of forming the Volunteer Army without much interest. Kornilov’s fear that he would have friction and misunderstandings with Alekseev was justified from the first days of their joint work. The forced abandonment of Kornilov in the south of Russia was a big political mistake of the “National Center”. But they believed that if Kornilov left, many volunteers would leave behind him and the work begun in Novocherkassk could fall apart. The formation of the welfare advance was slow, with an average of 75-80 volunteers enrolling per day. Weapons in the Don warehouses it was not enough, it was necessary to take it away from the soldiers traveling to their homes, to train troop echelons passing through Rostov and Novocherkassk, or to buy through buyers in the same echelon. Lack of funds is extremely difficult work. The formation of the Don units progressed even worse. Generals Alekseev and Kornilov understood that the Cossacks did not want to go to restore order in Russia, but they were sure that the Cossacks would defend their lands. However, the situation in the Cossack regions of the southeast was much more complex. The regiments returning from the front were completely neutral in the events that were taking place, and even showed a tendency toward Bolshevism, declaring that the Bolsheviks had done nothing wrong with them.

In addition, within the Cossack regions there was a hard struggle with a non-resident population, and in the Kuban and Terek regions also against the highlanders. The military atamans had the opportunity to use the well-trained teams of young Cossacks, who were preparing to be sent to the front, and to organize the call-up of regular ages of youth. General Kaledin could have had support in this from the side of the old men and the front-line soldiers who said: "We have served ourselves, now we must call others on." The formation of the Cossack youth from the draft age could give up to 2-3 divisions, which at that time was enough to maintain order on the Don, but this was not done. In late December, representatives of the British and French military missions arrived in Novocherkassk. They asked what had been done, what was planned to be done, after which they declared that they would be able to help, but so far only with money, in the amount of 100 million rubles, in tranches of 10 million per month. The first payment was expected in January, but was never received, and then the situation changed completely. The initial funds for the formation of the Dobroarmy consisted of donations, but they were scanty, mainly because of the greediness and stinginess of the Russian bourgeoisie and other propertied classes unimaginable for these circumstances. It should be said that the stinginess and avarice of the Russian bourgeoisie is simply legendary. Back in 1909, during the discussion in the State Duma on the issue of the kulaks, P.A. Stolypin uttered prophetic words. He said: “... there is no more greedy and shameless fist and bourgeois than in Russia. Not by chance in the Russian language in the course of the phrase "fist-world-eater and the bourgeois-world-eater." If they do not change the type of their social behavior, big shocks are waiting for us ... ”. He looked into the water. Social behavior, they have not changed. Almost all the organizers of the white movement point to the low usefulness of their appeals for material assistance to the property classes. Nevertheless, by the middle of January, a small Volunteer Army (about 5 thousand people) was turned out to be a very militant and morally strong army. Sovnarkom demanded the issuance or dispersal of volunteers. Kaledin and Krug answered: “There is no issue from the Don!”. The Bolsheviks, in order to liquidate the counter-revolutionaries, began to force their loyal troops from the Western and Caucasian fronts to the Don region. They began to threaten Don from the side of Donbass, Voronezh, Torgovaya and Tikhoretskaya. In addition, the Bolsheviks tightened control on the railways and the influx of volunteers dropped sharply. At the end of January, the Bolsheviks took Bataysk and Taganrog, on January 29, horse units moved from the Donbas to Novocherkassk. Don was defenseless against the red. Ataman Kaledin was taken aback, did not want bloodshed and decided to transfer his authority to the City Duma and democratic organizations, and then ended his life with a shot at the heart. It was a sad but logical outcome of his activities. The first Don Circle gave the first an elected ataman, but did not give him power.

At the head of the region was put the Military Government of the 14 elders, elected from each district. Their meetings had the character of a provincial duma and left no trace in the history of the Don. On November 20, the government appealed to the population with a very liberal declaration, convening a Cossack and peasant population congress on December 29 to arrange the life of the Don Region. In early January, a coalition government was created on a parity basis, 7 seats were provided to the Cossacks, 7 nonresident. The involvement of demagogues-intellectuals and revolutionary democracy into the government finally led to the paralysis of power. Ataman Kaledin ruined his trust in the Don peasants and non-residents, his famous "parity". He failed to glue together diverse pieces of the population of the Don region. Don, when he split into two camps, the Cossacks and Don peasants, along with non-resident workers and artisans. The last with a few exceptions were with the Bolsheviks. The Don peasantry, which constituted 48% of the population of the region, fascinated by the broad promises of the Bolsheviks, was not satisfied with the measures of the Don power: the introduction of zemstvos in the peasants' districts, the involvement of the peasants to participate in the village self-government, their wide acceptance in the Cossack class and the endowment of millions of ten thousand in their households, and in a massive number of ten thousand. Under the influence of the new socialist element, the Don peasantry demanded a general division of the entire Cossack land. The numerically smallest working environment (10-11%) was concentrated in the most important centers, was the most restless, and did not hide its sympathy for Soviet power. The revolutionary-democratic intelligentsia did not outlive its former psychology and, with surprising blinding, continued its destructive policy, which led to the demise of democracy on an all-Russian scale. The bloc of Mensheviks and Socialist-Revolutionaries reigned in all peasant and non-resident congresses, all sorts of thoughts, councils, trade unions and inter-party meetings. There was not a single meeting where resolutions on mistrust of the ataman, the government and the Circle, protests against their adoption of measures against anarchy, criminality and banditry would not be made.

They preached neutrality and reconciliation with the force that openly declared: "He who is not with us is against us." In the cities, working-class settlements and peasant settlements, the uprisings against the Cossacks did not subside. Attempts to put the divisions of workers and peasants in the Cossack regiments ended in disaster. They betrayed the Cossacks, went to the Bolsheviks and took the Cossack officers with them to torment and death. The war acquired the character of a class struggle. Cossacks defended their Cossack rights from the Don workers and peasants. The death of Ataman Kaledin and the occupation by the Bolsheviks of Novocherkassk end in the south during the Great War and the transition to a civil war.


Fig. 2 Ataman Kaledin


On February 12, the Bolshevik detachments occupied Novocherkassk and the army foreman Golubov in “thanks” for what General Nazarov once saved him from prison, and shot the new ataman. Having lost all hope of keeping Rostov, on the night of 9 (22) in February, the Dobronarmiya of the 2500 fighters left the city on Aksai, and then moved to the Kuban. After the establishment of the power of the Bolsheviks in Novocherkassk, terror began. The Cossack units were prudently scattered throughout the city in small groups, dominance in the city was in the hands of non-resident and Bolsheviks. On suspicion of having connections with Dobroarmiya, merciless executions of officers were carried out. The robberies and robberies of the Bolsheviks forced the Cossacks on their guard, even the Cossacks of the Golubovsky regiments took a wait. In the villages, where the power was seized by nonresident and Don peasants, the executive committees began to divide the Cossack lands. These atrocities soon caused Cossack uprisings in the stanitsas adjacent to Novocherkassk. The head of the Reds on the Don, Poditykov and the head of the Antonov punitive detachment, fled to Rostov, then were captured and executed. The occupation by the White Cossacks in April of Novocherkassk coincided with the occupation of Rostov by the Germans and the return of the Volunteer Army to the Don Region. But from the 252 stanitsas, Donskoy troops only 10 were liberated from the Bolsheviks. The Germans firmly occupied Rostov and Taganrog and the entire western part of the Donetsk district. Outposts of the Bavarian cavalry stood 12 versts from Novocherkassk. Under these conditions, Don faced four main tasks:
- immediately convene a new Circle, in which only the delegates of the liberated villages could take part
- to establish relations with the German authorities, find out their intentions and negotiate with them
- to recreate the Don Army
- establish relationships with the Volunteer Army.

April 28 held a general meeting of the Don government and delegates from the villages and military units who took part in the expulsion of Soviet troops from the Don region. The composition of this Circle could not have a claim to resolve questions for the whole Army, and therefore limited its work to the organization of the struggle for the liberation of the Don. The assembly decided to declare itself the Circle of Don's salvation. It had 130 people. Even in the Democratic Don it was the most popular assembly. The circle was called gray because there was no intelligentsia on it. The cowardly intelligentsia sat at this time in the cellars and basements, shook itself in its life, or fawned before the commissioners, enrolling in the council service or trying to get innocent in institutions for education, food and finance. She was not in the mood for elections in this troubled time, when both voters and deputies risked their heads. The circle was chosen without party struggle, it was not before. The circle was chosen and exclusively Cossacks were elected to it, who passionately wanted to save their native Don and were ready to give their lives for this. And these were not empty words, because after the elections, having sent their delegates, the electors themselves dismantled their weapons and went to save Don. This Circle did not have political physiognomy and had one goal - to save the Don from the Bolsheviks, by all means and at any cost. He was truly popular, meek, wise, and businesslike. And this gray, from the greatcoat and paltovy cloth, that is truly democratic, the Circle was saved by the Don people's mind. Already by the time of the convocation of the full military circle 15 of August 1918, the Don Land was cleared of the Bolsheviks.

The second urgent task for the Don was the settlement of relations with the Germans who occupied Ukraine and the western part of the land of the Don Army. Ukraine also claimed the Don lands occupied by the Germans: Donbass, Taganrog and Rostov. Attitudes towards the Germans and Ukraine were the most pressing issue, and 29 of April, the Circle decided to send an authorized plenipotentiary embassy to the Germans in Kiev to ascertain the reasons for their appearance on the territory of the Don. Negotiations took place in calm conditions. The Germans said that they were not going to occupy the region and promised to clear the occupied villages, which they soon fulfilled. On the same day, the Circle decided on the organization of a real army, not from partisans, volunteers or combatants, but obedient laws and discipline. So, around and around what for years the ataman Kaledin trampled down with his government and the Circle, consisting of talkers-intellectuals, and the gray circle of Don's salvation decided at two meetings. The Don Army was only in the project, and the command of the Volunteer Army already wished to bend it under itself. But the Circle clearly and concretely replied: “The high command of all without exception the military forces operating on the territory of the Don Cossacks should belong to the ataman of the troops ...”. Such an answer did not satisfy Denikin, he wanted in the face of the Don Cossacks to have large replenishments with people and material part, and not to have a “allied” army nearby. The circle worked intensively, meetings were held in the morning and in the evening. He was in a hurry to restore order and was not afraid of reproaches for striving to return to the old regime. 1 May Circle ruled: "Unlike the Bolshevik gangs, which do not wear any external distinction signs, all units involved in the defense of the Don immediately take on their military look and wear shoulder straps and other insignia." May 3 as a result of a closed vote 107 votes (13 against, 10 abstained), Major General P.N. was elected as ataman. Krasnov. General Krasnov did not accept this election before the Circle passes the laws that he considers necessary to be introduced in the Don Army for the possibility of fulfilling the tasks set for him by the Circle. Krasnov said at the Circle: “Creativity has never been the lot of the team. Raphael Madonna created Raphael, not the committee of artists ... You are the owners of the land of the Don, I am your manager. It's all about trust. If you trust me, you accept the laws proposed by me, if you do not adopt them, it means that you do not trust me, you are afraid that I use the power you have given to the detriment of the army. Then we have nothing to talk about. Without your complete trust, I cannot rule the army. ” On the question of one of the members of the Circle, whether he could not propose to change or alter in the laws proposed by the ataman, Krasnov replied: “You can. 48,49,50 articles. You can offer any flag except red, any coat of arms other than the Jewish five-pointed star, any anthem except the International ... ". The very next day, the Circle reviewed all the laws proposed by the ataman and adopted them. The circle restored the old pre-Petrine title “The Great Don Army”. The laws were almost a complete copy of the basic laws of the Russian Empire, with the difference that the rights and prerogatives of the emperor passed on to ... ataman.

Before the eyes of the Don Salvation Circle there were bloodied ghosts of the shot dead ataman Kaledin and the shot ataman Nazarov. Don lay in the rubble, he was not only destroyed, but dirtied by the Bolsheviks, and German horses drank the water of the Quiet Don, sacred to the Cossacks river. The work of the former Circles led to this, and Kaledin and Nazarov fought against the resolutions, but could not win because they had no power. But these laws have created ataman many enemies. As soon as the Bolsheviks were expelled, the intelligentsia crawled out of the cellars and basements and climbed out and arranged a liberal howl. Nor did these laws satisfy Denikin, who saw in them the desire for separatism. 5 May Circle dispersed, and the ataman was left alone to rule the army. That same evening, his adjutant, Esul Kulgavov, went to Kiev with handwritten letters to Hetman Skoropadsky and Emperor Wilhelm. The result of the letter was that the German delegation came to the Ataman 8 in May, stating that the Germans did not pursue any aggressive goals towards Don and would leave Rostov and Taganrog as soon as they saw that the Don Region had been restored to full order. May 9 Krasnov met with the Kuban chieftain Filimonov and the delegation of Georgia, and May 15 met in the village of Manychskaya with Alekseev and Denikin. The meeting revealed deep differences between the Don Ataman and the Command of the Goodwill in both tactics and the strategy of fighting the Bolsheviks. The purpose of the rebellious Cossacks was the liberation of the land of the Don from the Bolsheviks. They had no further intention to wage war outside their territory.


Fig. 3 Ataman Krasnov, PN


By the time Novocherkassk was seized and the ataman was elected around the Don rescue circle, all armed forces consisted of six foot and two cavalry regiments of different numbers. The junior officers were from the villages and were good, but there were a shortage of hundreds and regimental commanders. Having experienced many insults and humiliations during the revolution, many senior commanders at first had a distrust of the Cossack movement. Cossacks were dressed in their paramilitary dress, lacking boots. Up to 30% were dressed in supports and sandals. Most wore epaulets, caps and hats all wore white stripes to distinguish it from the red guard. Discipline was fraternal, the officers ate with the Cossacks from the same cauldron, because they were most often relatives. The headquarters were small, for economic purposes there were several public figures from the villages in the shelves who solved all logistical issues. The fight was transient. Trenches and fortifications were not built. There was little of a shanty tool, and natural laziness interfered with digging into the Cossacks. The tactic was simple. At dawn, the attack started with liquid chains. At this time, an intricate route moved roundabout in the flank and rear of the enemy. If the enemy was ten times stronger, it was considered normal for the offensive. As soon as a roundabout column appeared, the Reds began to retreat and then the Cossack cavalry rushed at them with a wild, chilling geek, overturned and captured. Sometimes the battle began with a mock retreat of twenty versts (this is an ancient Cossack Venter). Red rushed to pursue, and at this time roundabout columns closed behind them and the enemy found himself in a firing bag. With such tactics, Colonel Guselshchikov with regiments in 2-3 thousands of people crushed and captured entire Red Guard divisions in 10-15 thousands of people with transports and artillery. The Cossack custom demanded that officers go ahead, therefore their losses were very great. For example, the commander General Mamantov was wounded three times and all in chains. In the attack, the Cossacks were merciless, were also merciless to the captive Red Guards. Particularly harsh were the captive Cossacks, who were considered traitors to the Don. Here the father used to sentence his son to death and did not want to say goodbye to him. Sometimes and vice versa. At that time, the echelons of the Red forces, which had fled to the east, continued to move across the territory of the Don. But in June, the railway line was cleared of the Reds, and in July, after the Bolsheviks were expelled from the Khopersky District, the entire territory of the Don was freed from the Reds by the Cossacks themselves.

In other Cossack regions the situation was no easier than on the Don. A particularly difficult situation was among the Caucasian tribes, where the Russian population was scattered. The North Caucasus was raging. The fall of the central government caused a more serious shock here than anywhere else. Reconciled by the royal power, but not outdated by age-old discord and not forgotten old offenses, the multi-tribal population became agitated. The Russian element that united it, about 40% of the population consisted of two equal groups, the Terek Cossacks and non-resident. But these groups were separated by social conditions, reduced their land accounts and could not oppose the Bolshevik danger of unity and strength. While the ataman Karaulov was alive, several Terek regiments and some ghost of power remained. On December 13, at the station of the Cool crowd of Bolshevik soldiers, by order of the Vladikavkaz Soviet, uncoupled the ataman car, drove off to a long dead end, and fired at the car. Karaulov was killed. In fact, on the Terek, power passed to local councils and gangs of soldiers of the Caucasian front, who flowed from the South Caucasus in a continuous stream and, not being able to penetrate further, to their native places, due to complete blockage of the Caucasian highways, settled as locusts on the Terek-Dagestan edge. They terrorized the population, implanted new soviets or hired the service of existing ones, bringing fear, blood and destruction everywhere. This stream served as the most powerful conductor of Bolshevism, which seized the Russian population nonresident (because of the thirst of the land), hurt the Cossack intelligentsia (because of the thirst for power) and embarrassed the Terek Cossacks (because of the fear of “going against the people”). As for the mountaineers, they were extremely conservative in their way of life, in which social and land inequality was very poorly reflected. True to their customs and traditions, they were governed by their national councils and were alien to the ideas of Bolshevism. But the mountaineers quickly and willingly perceived the applied sides of the central anarchy and intensified violence and plunder. By disarming passing troop trains, they had a lot of weapons and ammunition. On the basis of the Caucasian native corps, they formed national military formations.


Fig. 4 Cossack areas of Russia

After the death of Ataman Karaulov, the overwhelming struggle against the Bolshevik detachments that filled the region and the aggravation of controversial issues with neighbors - Kabardians, Chechens, Ossetians, Ingushs - the Terek Army was turned into a republic that was part of the RSFSR. Quantitatively, the Terek Cossacks in the Terek region accounted for 20% of the population, non-residents - 20%, Ossetians - 17%, Chechens - 16%, Kabardians - 12% and Ingushs - 4%. The most active among other nations were the smallest — the Ingush, who set out a strong and well-armed detachment. They robbed everyone and kept Vladikavkaz in constant fear, which they captured and plundered in January. When 9 March 1918 was established in Dagestan, like on the Terek, Soviet power was established, the Council of People's Commissars set the first goal to break the Terek Cossacks, destroying its special advantages. Armed expeditions of the highlanders were sent to the stanitsa, robbery, violence and murder were made, land was taken and transferred to the Ingush and Chechens. In this difficult situation Terek Cossacks fell spirit. While the mountain peoples created their armed forces by improvisation, the natural Cossack army, which had well-organized regiments of 12, decomposed, dispersed and disarmed at the request of the Bolsheviks. However, the excesses of the red led to the fact that the 18 of June 1918 of the year begins the uprising of the Terek Cossacks under the leadership of Bicherahov. The Cossacks defeat the Red troops and block their remnants in Grozny and Kizlyar. On July 20 in Mozdok, the Cossacks were convened at a congress, at which they decided to launch an armed uprising against Soviet power. The Tertians established contact with the command of the Volunteer Army, the Terek Cossacks created a fighting unit to 12 000 people with 40 guns and resolutely took the path of fighting the Bolsheviks.

The Orenburg Army under the leadership of Ataman Dutov, the first to declare independence from the power of the Soviets, was the first to undergo an invasion of detachments of workers and red soldiers who began robbery and repression. A veteran of the fight against the Soviets of Orenburg Cossack General I.G. Akulinin recalled: “The stupid and harsh policy of the Bolsheviks, their undisguised hatred of the Cossacks, abuse of Cossack shrines and, especially, massacres, requisition, indemnity and robbery in the villages - all this opened the eyes to the essence of Soviet power and forced to take up arms . The Bolsheviks could not lure the Kazakov. The Cossacks had land, and they returned the will in the form of the widest self-government in the first days of the February revolution. ” In the mood of the ordinary and front-line Cossacks, a turning point gradually came, it began to speak more and more actively against the violence and arbitrariness of the new government. If in January 1918, the ataman Dutov, under pressure from the Soviet troops, left Orenburg, and he had barely three hundred active fighters, then on the night of April 4, more than 1000 Cossacks made an attack on the sleeping Orenburg, and on July 3 power again in Orenburg passed into the hands of the chieftain.


Fig.5 Ataman Dutov


In the area of ​​the Ural Cossacks, resistance proceeded more successfully, despite the small size of the Army. Uralsk was not occupied by the Bolsheviks. Since the beginning of the birth of Bolshevism, the Ural Cossacks did not accept its ideology and, in March, the local Bolshevik revolutionary committees easily dispersed. The main reasons were that there were no nonresident people among the Urals, there was a lot of land, and the Cossacks were Old Believers, who kept their religious and moral principles more strictly. Cossack areas of Asian Russia in general occupied a special position. All of them were few in composition, most of them historically formed under special conditions by state measures, for purposes of state necessity, and their historical existence was determined by insignificant terms. Despite the fact that these troops did not have well-established Cossack traditions, attitudes and skills to the forms of statehood, they all turned out to be hostile to the advancing Bolshevism. In the middle of April, 1918, from Manchuria in Transbaikalia, troops of Ataman Semyonov launched an offensive around 1000 bayonets and sabers against 5,5 thousands of Reds. At the same time, the uprising of the Trans-Baikal Cossacks began. By May, the troops of Semenov approached Chita, but they could not immediately take it. The fights between the Cossacks of Semenov and the red detachments, consisting mainly of former political prisoners and captured Hungarians, in the Transbaikalia went with varying success. However, in late July, the Cossacks defeated the red troops and 28 of August took Chita. Soon the Amur Cossacks drove the Bolsheviks out of their capital, Blagoveshchensk, and the Ussuri Cossacks took Khabarovsk. Thus, under the command of their atamans: Zabaikalsky-Semenov, Ussuriysky-Kalmykov, Semirechensky-Annenkov, Ural-Tolstova, Siberian-Ivanov, Orenburg-Dutov, Astrakhan-Prince Tundutov, they entered a decisive battle. In the fight against the Bolsheviks, the Cossack regions fought exclusively for their lands and the rule of law, and their actions, by definition, by historians, were in the nature of a partisan war.


Fig. 6 White Cossacks

A huge role throughout the Siberian railway track was played by the troops of the Czechoslovak legions, formed by the Russian government from Czech and Slovak prisoners of war, numbering up to 45 LLC man. By the beginning of the revolution, the Czech corps was standing in the rear of the South-Western Front in Ukraine. In the eyes of the Austro-Germans, legionnaires, like former prisoners of war, were traitors. When the Germans attacked Ukraine in March 1918, the Czechs put up strong resistance to them, but most Czechs did not see their place in Soviet Russia and wished to return to the European front. Under an agreement with the Bolsheviks, Czech echelons were sent to Siberia for boarding ships in Vladivostok and sending them to Europe. In addition to the Czechoslovakia, there were many captured Hungarians in Russia who mostly sympathized with red. With the Hungarians, the Czechoslovakians had a centuries-old and fierce hostility and enmity (as in this connection, one cannot recall the immortal works of J. Hasek). Due to the fear of attacks in the way of the Hungarian red units, the Czechs resolutely refused to obey the Bolshevik order to surrender all weapons, which is why the Czech legions were decided to disperse. They were divided into four groups with a distance between groups of trains in 1000 kilometers, so that the trains with the Czechs stretched across Siberia from the Volga to Transbaikalia. The Czech legions played a colossal role in the Russian civil war, since after their rebellion the struggle against the Soviets intensified sharply.


Fig. 7 Czech Legion on the way to Transsib

Despite the agreements, there were considerable misunderstandings in the relations between the Czechs, the Hungarians and the local revolutionary committees. As a result of 25 in May 1918, 4,5, thousands of Czechs rebelled in Mariinsk, and on May 26, the Hungarians provoked an uprising of 8,8 in thousands of Czechs in Chelyabinsk. Then, with the support of the Czechoslovak troops, the power of the Bolsheviks was overthrown by 26 May in Novikolayevsk, 29 May in Penza, 30 May in Syzran, 31 May in Tomsk and Kurgan, 7 June in Omsk, 8 June in Samara and 18 June in Krasnoyarsk. The formation of Russian military units began in the liberated areas. July 5 Russian and Czechoslovak troops occupy Ufa, and July YNK take 25. The Czechoslovak legionaries themselves at the end of the 1918 year began a gradual withdrawal to the Far East. But, participating in battles in the army of Kolchak, they will finally finish the withdrawal and go from Vladivostok to France only at the beginning of the 1920 year. In such conditions, the Russian white movement began in the Volga region and Siberia, not counting the independent actions of the Ural and Orenburg Cossack troops, who began the struggle against the Bolsheviks immediately after their coming to power. On June 8, a Constituent Assembly Committee (Komuch) was created in the Samara liberated from the Reds. He declared himself a temporary revolutionary power, which, having spread over the entire territory of Russia, was to transfer the control of the country to the legally elected Constituent Assembly. The rising population of the Volga region began a successful struggle against the Bolsheviks, but in the liberated places the administration was in the hands of the fleeing fragments of the Provisional Government. These heirs and participants of the destructive activity, having formed the government, carried out the same pernicious work. At the same time, Komuch created his own armed forces - the People's Army. 9 June in Samara, a detachment in 350 man began to command Lieutenant Colonel Kappel. The replenished squad in mid-June takes Syzran, Stavropol Volzhsky (now Togliatti), and also inflicts a heavy defeat in red near Melekes. July 21 Kappel takes Simbirsk, defeating the superior forces of the Soviet city commander Guy defending the city. As a result, by the beginning of August 1918, the territory of the Constituent Assembly extends from west to east on the 750 versts from Syzran to Zlatoust, from north to south on the 500 versts from Simbirsk to Volsk. On August 7, the troops of Kappel, after having crushed the red river flotilla that had come out towards them, took Kazan to the mouth of the Kama. There, they capture part of the gold reserves of the Russian Empire (650 million gold rubles in coins, 100 million rubles by credit signs, gold bars, platinum and other valuables), as well as huge warehouses with weapons, ammunition, medicines, ammunition. This gave the Samara government a solid financial and material base. With the capture of Kazan, the full-staff Academy in the city of General Staff, headed by General A. I. Andogsky, entered the anti-Bolshevik camp.


Fig. 8 Hero Komucha Lt. Col. Kappel V.O.

In Yekaterinburg, a government of industrialists was formed, in Omsk, a Siberian government, in Chita, the government of Ataman Semyonov, who led the Trans-Baikal army. The Allies dominated Vladivostok. Then General Horvain arrived from Harbin, and as many as three authorities were formed: from the Allies' appointees, General Horvath, and from the board of the railway. Such fragmentation of the anti-Bolshevik front in the east required unification, and a meeting was convened in Ufa to select a single authoritative state authority. The situation in parts of the anti-Bolshevik forces was unfavorable. The Czechs did not want to fight in Russia and demanded that they be sent to the European fronts against the Germans. There was no confidence in the Siberian government and members of Komuch among the troops and among the people. In addition, the representative of England, General Knox, said that until a firm government was created, the delivery of supplies from the British would be stopped. Under these conditions, Admiral Kolchak joined the government and in the fall he made a coup and was proclaimed head of the government and supreme commander with the transfer of all his power.

In the south of Russia, events developed as follows. After being red at the start of Novocherkassk’s 1918, the Volunteer Army retreated to the Kuban. During the march to Ekaterinodar, the army, having endured all the difficulties of the winter campaign, later called the “ice march”, continuously fought. After the death of General Kornilov, who was killed near Yekaterinodar on 31 of March (13 of April), the army again broke through with a large number of prisoners to the territory of the Don, where by then the Cossacks revolted against the Bolsheviks and began clearing their territory. The army only by May got into conditions that allowed it to rest and replenish for further struggle against the Bolsheviks. Although the relationship between the command of the Volunteer Army and the German army was irreconcilable, it did not have the means of armament and tearfully begged the ataman Krasnov to send the Volunteer army the weapons, shells and ammunition he received from the German army. Ataman Krasnov, in his colorful expression, receiving military equipment from hostile Germans, washed them in the clear waters of the Don and transferred part of the Volunteer Army. Kuban was still occupied by the Bolsheviks. In the Kuban region, the gap with the center, which occurred in the Don due to the collapse of the Provisional Government, occurred earlier and sharper. Even 5 of October, with a decisive protest of the Provisional Government, the regional Cossack glad took a decision on the allocation of the territory in an independent Kuban republic. At the same time, only the Cossack, the mountain population and the old-age peasants were given the right to choose the self-government body, that is, almost half of the region’s population was deprived of voting rights. At the head of the socialist government was a military ataman, colonel Filimonov. The discord between the Cossack and non-resident population took more and more acute forms. Not only non-resident population, but also front-line Cossacks, were against the Rada and the government. Bolshevism came to this mass. The Kuban units, returning from the front, did not go to war against the government, did not want to fight the Bolsheviks, and did not obey the orders of their elected government. An attempt to model the Don on the basis of "parity" ended in the same paralysis of power. Everywhere, in every village, village, a red guard from non-resident gathered, a part of the front-line Cossacks, poorly subordinate to the center, but following exactly his policy, joined them. These undisciplined, but well-armed and violent gangs set about planting Soviet power, redistributing the land, withdrawing grain surpluses and socializing, and simply plundering the well-to-do Cossacks and decapitating the Cossacks — persecuting officers, non-Bolshevik intelligentsia, priests, authoritative old men. And above all to disarmament. It is surprising that the Cossack villages, shelves and batteries gave up their rifles, machine guns, and guns with complete nonresistance. When the stanitsas of the Yeisk Department revolted in late April, it was a completely unarmed militia. The Cossacks had no more than a hundred 10 rifles, the rest were armed with what they could. Some attached daggers or scythes to long sticks, others took pitchforks, others spears, and others simply shovels and axes. Punitive detachments with ... Cossack weapons came out against defenseless villages. By the beginning of April, all villages of other cities and 85 from 87 villages were Bolshevik. But the Bolshevism of the villages was purely external.

Where executive committees were seized from other cities, there was a sabotage of their decisions, re-electing every week. There was a stubborn, but passive, without enthusiasm and enthusiasm, the struggle of the age-old structure of the Cossack democracy and life with the new government. There was a desire to preserve the Cossack democracy, but there was no daring. All this, in addition, was heavily mixed in on the pro-Ukrainian separatism of the part of the Cossacks who had Dnieper roots. The pro-Ukrainian leader Luka Bych, who was at the head of the Rada, said: "To help the Volunteer Army is to prepare Russia for the absorption of the Kuban again." Under these conditions, Ataman Shkuro assembled the first partisan detachment located in the region of Stavropol, where the Council met, stepped up the struggle and presented an ultimatum to the Council. The uprising of the Kuban Cossacks quickly gained momentum. In June, the 8 thousandth Volunteer Army began its second campaign against the Kuban who had completely rebelled against the Bolsheviks. This time, White was lucky. General Denikin consistently defeated Kalnin’s thousandth army under White Clay and Tikhoretskaya 30, then in the fierce battle near Yekaterinodar, 30, the thousandth army of Sorokin. July 21 white occupies Stavropol, and August 17 Ekaterinodar. Blocked on the Taman Peninsula, the 30 thousandth grouping of Reds under the command of Kovtyukh, the so-called "Taman Army", along the Black Sea coast with fights, breaks through the Kuban River, where the remnants of the defeated armies of Kalnin and Sorokin fled. By the end of August, the territory of the Kuban army was completely cleared of the Bolsheviks, and the number of the white army reached 40 thousand bayonets and sabers. However, having entered the territory of the Kuban, Denikin issued a decree addressed to the Kuban chieftain and the government, demanding:
- full tension from the Kuban for his speedy release from the Bolsheviks
- all the primary units of the Kuban military forces must henceforth be part of the Volunteer Army to perform national tasks
- in the future by the liberated Kuban Cossacks no separatism should be manifested.

Such a blatant interference by the command of the Volunteer Army in the internal affairs of the Kuban Cossacks was negative. General Denikin led an army that did not have a certain territory, a people under his control and, even worse, a political ideology. The commander of the Don Army, General Denisov, in his hearts even called the volunteers "wandering musicians." The ideas of General Denikin focused on the armed struggle. Not having sufficient funds for this, General Denikin demanded that the Cossack regions of the Don and the Kuban be subordinated to him for the struggle. Don was in better conditions and absolutely not bound by Denikin’s instructions. The German army was perceived on the Don as a real force, helping to get rid of Bolshevik domination and terror. The Don government entered into contact with the German command and established fruitful cooperation. Relations with the Germans turned into a purely business form. The exchange rate of the German mark in 75 kopecks of the Don currency was established, the rate of the Russian rifle with 30 cartridges in one pood of wheat or rye was made, other supply agreements were concluded. For the first month and a half, the Don army received from the German army: 11 651 rifle, 88 machine guns, 46 troops, 109 thousands of artillery shells, 11,5 millions of rifle cartridges, from which were transferred to the Volunteer Army 35 thousands of artillery shells and manufacured ammunition shells and manufacterers of numerical artillery shells, thousands of artillery shells, and 9 rifle cartridges. At the same time, the whole shame of peaceful relations with an implacable opponent fell solely on the ataman Krasnov. As for the High Command, then, according to the laws of the Don Army, it could only belong to the Military Ataman, and before his election, to the traveling Ataman. This discrepancy led to the fact that Don demanded the return of all Donians from the Donor Army. Relations between Don and Dobromrmiya were not allied, but relations of fellow travelers.

In addition to tactics, there were also large discrepancies in the white movement in strategy, politics, and war aims. The goal of the Cossack masses was to liberate their land from the invasion of the Bolsheviks, establish order in their area and provide the Russian people with the opportunity to arrange their own destiny. Meanwhile, the forms of civil war and the organization of the armed forces returned military art in the era of the XIX century. The successes of the troops then depended solely on the qualities of the commander who directly controlled the troops. Good commanders of the XIX century, the main forces were not scattered, and directed to one main goal: the seizure of the political center of the enemy. With the seizure of the center, the paralysis of the government of the country takes place and the conduct of the war is complicated. Sovnarkom, who was sitting in Moscow, was in extremely difficult conditions, reminiscent of the position of Muscovite XIV-XV centuries, limited to the Oka and Volga rivers. Moscow was cut off from all types of supplies, and the goals of the Soviet rulers were limited to obtaining basic food and a piece of sustenance. In the pathetic calls of the leaders there were no longer high motives emanating from the ideas of Marx, they sounded cynical, figurative and simple, as they once sounded in the speeches of the national leader Pugachev: "Go, take everything and destroy everyone who stands in your way" . Commissar Bronstein (Trotsky) in his speech on 9 June 1918, pointed out simple and clear goals: “Comrades! Among all the questions that worry our hearts, there is one simple question - the question of our daily bread. Over all thoughts, over all our ideals, one concern now dominates, one anxiety: how to survive tomorrow. Everyone involuntarily thinks about himself, about his family ... My task is not to conduct only one campaign among you. We need to seriously talk about the food situation of the country. According to our statistics, in 17, the year of excess bread in those places that produce and export bread, was 882 LLC LLC poods. On the other hand, there are areas in the country where there is not enough bread. If you count, it turns out that they lack 322 LLC LLC poods. So, in one part of the country there are 882 LLC LLC pounds of excess, and in the other 322 LLC LLC poods are not enough ...

In the North Caucasus alone, there is now no less grain surplus than 140 000 000: we, in order to satisfy hunger, need the whole country 15 000 LLC pounds per month. So think for it: 140 000 000 pounds of surplus, located only in the North Caucasus, may be enough for ten months for the whole country. ... Let each of you now promise to provide immediate practical assistance in order for us to set up a campaign for bread. ” In fact, it was a direct call for robbery. Due to the complete lack of publicity, the paralysis of public life and the complete fragmentation of the country, the Bolsheviks nominated people for leadership positions for whom in normal conditions there is one place - a prison. Under such conditions, the task of the white command in the struggle against the Bolsheviks should have had the shortest goal of seizing Moscow, without being distracted by any other secondary tasks. And to accomplish this main task, it was necessary to attract the widest sections of the people, primarily the peasants. In reality, it was the opposite. Instead of going to Moscow, the volunteer army was firmly bogged down in the North Caucasus, the Ural-Siberian white troops could not get over the Volga. All the revolutionary changes beneficial to the peasants and the people, economic and political, were not recognized as whites. The first step of their civil representatives in the liberated territory was a decree repealing all orders issued by the Provisional Government and Council of People's Commissars, including those relating to property relations. General Denikin, having absolutely no plan to establish a new order capable of satisfying the population, consciously or unconsciously, wanted to return Russia to its original pre-revolutionary position, and the peasants were obliged to pay for the occupied lands to their former owners. After that, could whites rely on the support of their activities by peasants? Of course not. Cossacks also refused to go beyond the Don Cossacks. And they were right. Voronezh, Saratov and other peasants not only did not fight the Bolsheviks, but also went against the Cossacks. The Cossacks, not without difficulty, were able to cope with their Don peasants and non-townspeople, but they could not defeat the entire peasant central Russia and understood this perfectly.

As the Russian and non-Russian history shows us, when cardinal changes and decisions are required, we need not just people, but extraordinary personalities, which unfortunately did not turn out during the Russian timelessness. The country needed a power that could not only issue decrees, but also have wit and authority, so that these decrees were carried out by the people, preferably voluntarily. Such power does not depend on state forms, but is based, as a rule, solely on the abilities and authority of the leader. Bonaparte, having approved the power, did not look for any forms, but managed to force him to obey his will. He forced France to serve both the representatives of the Korolev levies and those who came from sans-culottes. There were no such consolidating personalities in the white and red movement and this led to an incredible split and bitterness in the ensuing civil war. But that's another story.

Materials used:
Gordeev A.A. - History of the Cossacks
Mamonov V.F. and others. - History of the Cossacks of the Urals. Orenburg-Chelyabinsk 1992
Shibanov N.S. - Orenburg Cossacks of the XX century
Ryzhkova N.V. - Don Cossacks in the wars of the early twentieth century-2008
Brusilov A.A. My memories. Military Publishing. M.1983
Krasnov P.N. Great Don army. "Patriot" M.1990
Lukomsky A.S. Origin of the Volunteer Army. M.1926
Denikin A.I. How the struggle against the Bolsheviks began in the south of Russia. M.1926
101 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    13 March 2015 06: 41
    Wah, what a topic !!!
    We dug up a terribly interesting topic, ATP, we will read.
    I don’t know much about the citizen - I don’t like reading about her, only recently I overpower myself - it’s wildly painful and sad to study those terrible events
    1. +2
      13 March 2015 11: 45
      Quote: Gans1234
      Wah, what a topic !!!
      We dug up a terribly interesting topic, ATP, we will read.
      I don’t know much about the citizen - I don’t like reading about her, only recently I overpower myself - it’s wildly painful and sad to study those terrible events


      In those days, everything was ambiguous and difficult for us to judge.
      The stigma in the fluff of those and others was
      They told me about the grandmother that they both robbed and raped
      So for ordinary people there was no difference am
    2. +3
      13 March 2015 15: 02
      Quote: Gans1234
      Wah, what a topic !!!

      Yes ...
      Surprisingly, for "individual civilians" it is still not completely clear "The reasons why the Cossacks of all Cossack regions for the most part rejected the destructive ideas of Bolshevism and entered into an open struggle against them."
      "Quiet Don" forgotten, or what? Or, most likely, never read it. Half of the great epic, by the way, equally recognized both in the USSR and in the West (M.A. Sholokhov and Stalin and Nobel laureate Yes ) is devoted to a description of the reasons that, you see, for historians? laughing "make up a riddle".
  2. 0
    13 March 2015 07: 24
    Yes Yes Yes.
    Bolsheviks are bad
    Cossacks (white) are good.
    The article somehow does not smell good.
    1. +1
      13 March 2015 07: 59
      Well, who? The Cossacks were not fluffy, but it was the Bolsheviks who unleashed the civil war.They bear most of the responsibility. Lenin said: "Let us turn the imperialist war into a civil war." You can blame the Tsar and the Cossacks as much as you like for the collapse of the country, but it was the Bolsheviks and Lenin who brought them to civilian famine.
      1. dmb
        +3
        13 March 2015 09: 04
        Is it possible to find out what such a profound conclusion is based on? Give arguments other than "everyone who has read the newspaper Nagayka knows".
        1. +4
          13 March 2015 09: 29
          Yes, easily.
          - transfer of Germany to Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltic states, exit from the Entente, which was regarded as a national betrayal;
          - The introduction of a food dictatorship (essentially a total robbery of peasants) and kombedov in May - June 1918;
          - establishment of a one-party system - July 1918;
          - constitutional consolidation of the dictatorship of the proletariat and the power of the Bolsheviks - 10 July 1918 g .;
          - execution of the king and his family - 17 July 1918 g .;
          - nationalization of all industry (in fact, the Bolsheviks appropriation of all private property in the country) - 28 July 1918
          1. +2
            13 March 2015 09: 46
            Those. you don’t know a damn, but use the propaganda of liberals 90's?
            1. +1
              13 March 2015 10: 06
              this is not agitation, these are facts. Dates are given ..
              1. -2
                13 March 2015 10: 28
                So you don’t understand what you know. It is necessary to look at the consequences of actions, and not of the actions themselves.
              2. +1
                13 March 2015 17: 20
                Jaros81
                Data?
                are these facts? - "- the transfer of Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltic states to Germany, the withdrawal from the Entente, which was regarded as a national betrayal;"? This is not a fact, but an unsubstantiated juggling of the events that have taken place, without considering the causes and consequences. the world, so it was canceled, soon, and by 39, the lost was completely returned.
                In addition, only an absolutely undeveloped individual who does not know the postulate that for the sake of more, one must sometimes sacrifice small ones, at that time and under those conditions, would lose everything at all.
                Oh, what a pearl- "the introduction of a food dictatorship (in fact, total robbery of peasants) and kombedov in May - June 1918;" - IN GENERAL, the prodrazvestka was introduced even under the mediocre Nikolashka, and after the Provisional Government, and for the sake of the survival of the cities, it was necessary to take pretty harsh measures, or following your stupidity, it was necessary to kill, for example, the population of Moscow, St. Petersburg?
                Another nonsense ... "- the establishment of a one-party system - July 1918;" - And who m, s you corrected a screw in your head so that you recall, for example, the actions of the ESERs in inciting and supporting civil and direct riots? And the banditry of the anarchists Not to mention all the Directory and other ruling the country such as Kolchak and K.
                Awesome, it must be so annealed - "the constitutional consolidation of the dictatorship of the proletariat and the power of the Bolsheviks - July 10, 1918." to give to Kolchak, Deniknin, Wrangel,? As it turned out, none of them, in general, the PEOPLE, did not want to give power.
                Heh, well, he gave out- "the shooting of the tsar and his family - July 17, 1918;" - A CITIZEN with the rank of colonel by the name of Romanov, nothing more, and shed tears for him, when, due to his spinelessness and, frankly, unsuitability, the country lost a total of 15 million, including here, both the losses of the First World War and the Civil, for nothing, on his conscience the blood and tears of millions sent by him to the war, for absolutely other people's interests.
                What a shame, the factory was not left - "the nationalization of the entire industry (in fact, the appropriation by the Bolsheviks of all private property in the country) - July 28, 1918" - ABSOLUTELY true deed.
          2. avt
            +7
            13 March 2015 10: 16
            Quote: Jaros81
            - execution of the king and his family - 17 July 1918 g .;
            I agree besides that. About Niki # 2 it seems Sverdlov, and maybe Ulyanov / Lenin, I don't remember from memory, said - "Nobody will know what we did with him." The scam with burying and digging in the skulls of a KGB major with a writer and subsequent burial in a pile in Petropavlovka considered only as an excuse for the division of the property of the Romanovs' house abroad. By the way - the vice receptionist who was freshly shot on the Moscow bridge then played an active role. Even EBONA was FORCED to come to the ceremony, what such arguments did Likhachev find request that EBON stepped on its own feet, and the Russian Orthodox Church never recognized the remains either.
            Quote: Jaros81
            ... Lenin said: "Let us turn the imperialist war into a civil war."

            good And quite publicly and openly! Feeling free no one.
            Quote: Georg Shep
            . It is time to fully pay tribute to our glorious ancestors.

            An avatar like Kornilov's from the Ice campaign? And the truth about the visit of the Kornilovs to Rostov-on-Don, well, when the same Kaledin shot himself in shame, and who actually went away with him on that campaign, would you also tell? And about Krasnov, how did he “gloriously defend the borders of Russia?” Or will you lasciviously justify, they say, he’s not like that, but life is like that, and specifically - the Bolsheviks? - before they said only "A", but now only "B", but somehow it is not very successful to pronounce it consistently, more and more incantations about "truth", and pastoral pictures of "a happy life according to the way".
          3. dmb
            +3
            13 March 2015 10: 54
            All the same from "Nagayki" arguments. Let's go. On January 27.01, a separate peace treaty was signed by the Ukrainian Central Rada, and the Bolsheviks signed the Brest Treaty only on March 3, after the start of the German offensive, to which there was simply nothing to oppose. Obviously, you, as a "patriot", would be more satisfied with the occupation of the entire European part of Russia by the Germans. Food allocation was introduced by the unforgettable Nikolasha. And the "robbed" peasants, having plundered the landowners with joy, were somehow greatly outraged by the fact that the power that had given them the landowners' land. in return, she demanded that they support this power in a war. This is good about one-party system, it would be much better in the conditions of the same war, without gaining strength, in less than half a year to return everything that is possible, and continue to listen to the balabol Kerensky and those like him. The constitutionality of anchoring? Do you obviously believe that the absence of new laws would be extremely beneficial for the existence of the state? Nationalization? Is your last name not Ryabushinsky? With Batiushka, of course, it turned out wrong, although if you consider that the reason for his execution was the offensive of the White Guards, then as an argument, the unleashing of war by the Bolsheviks, this is the weakest. The funny thing is that none of the arguments explains why these wicked people (Bolsheviks) had to unleash a war if they had already taken power. So from "Nagayka".
            1. +3
              13 March 2015 11: 34
              once again the dates are indicated. And my ancestors still served that "tsarist" Russia with faith and truth, and Soviet too. So it’s not a whip. The food appropriation system was introduced by Nikolai. Please indicate the date. About that the German could occupy the entire European part of Russia. Complete nonsense. By 1917, only Poland was occupied by the Germans. As a result of two revolutions, the front collapsed and the Germans also occupied Ukraine.
              On October 26, 1917, the Bolsheviks issued the "Decree on Peace", according to which there was to be "a peace without annexations and indemnities." An appeal was sent to all the belligerent powers. The content of the secret treaties between the Russian Empire and the Allies was published. For obvious reasons, the proposal was accepted only by Germany.
              Negotiations about peace began (the so-called Brest Peace).
              Lenin instructed Trotsky to sign the treaty if the Germans issued an ultimatum. Which is what happened.
              The contract was signed. Their whole "world without annexations and indemnities" resulted in this:
              An area of ​​780 thousand square meters was torn away from Russia. km with a population of 56 million people (one third of the population of the Russian Empire) and on which (before the revolution) were located: 27% of the cultivated agricultural land, 26% of the entire railway network, 33% of the textile industry, 73% of iron and steel was smelted, 89% of coal and coal were mined 90% sugar was made; 918 textile factories, 574 breweries, 133 tobacco factories, 1685 distilleries, 244 chemical factories, 615 pulp mills, 1073 machine-building plants were located and 40% of industrial workers were located.
              Separately, it should be noted that Russia paid 6 billions of marks of reparations plus the payment of losses incurred by Germany during the Russian revolution - 500 million gold rubles.
              The criminal connivance of the Bolsheviks led to famine and civil war.
              1. dmb
                +2
                13 March 2015 12: 22
                Let's leave the deceased alone. Procurement on 2.12.2016/25.03.2017/XNUMX, then XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX. Minsk, Polotsk, Pskov, Gomel, Chernigov, Mogilev and Revel, these are all entirely Polish territory. I'm not even talking about Kiev. Or did the Bolsheviks create the Rada too? The fact that you have passed from "unleashing" the civil war to "connivance" is comforting. There were such facts. Nobody especially hindered the white leaders from creating a military force to overthrow Soviet power. I can imagine how joyfully the "liberators" would be greeted by the same peasants, from whom they would take back the land and the piano from the manor's manor.
              2. +2
                13 March 2015 16: 11
                Quote: Jaros81
                The criminal connivance of the Bolsheviks led to famine and civil war.

                The famine brought about the collapse of the Empire’s transport network, which occurred even with the good priest-king.
                For reference: at the beginning of 1917 in the Empire, from 20 239 steam engines were serviceable 10 215. Of 590 000 wagons, only 166 684. While the Mobilization Plan (No. 19) provided for the need for 19 856 freight and 4 000 passenger locomotives.
                And in addition to rolling stock, more rails were required ...
                During the First World War, metallurgical plants switched to the production of metal for military purposes, and its production for the needs of the railroads decreased from 41 million pounds in 1913 to 28 million in 1916. Orders of the Ministry of Railways were not systematically carried out .
                The allies rejected the request of the tsarist government for the supply of ferrous metal. In 1916, the railway crisis became apparent.
                1. 0
                  13 March 2015 17: 00
                  But after all, we were not ready for war by the 14 year, and only by the 16 year, according to Shulgin, the gun had 100 parks of shells (ammunition) and Russian artillery could freely slaughter Germans and Austrians. It was a pity that at that time there was no fighting structure with sabotage in the rear, otherwise we would have ended the war by the year 17. But this is our country - and the mistakes of the Great War were taken into account in the next war.
                  1. 0
                    13 March 2015 17: 26
                    Quote: semirek
                    But after all, we were not ready for war for the 14 year, and only for the 16 year, according to Shulgin, the gun had 100 parks of shells (ammunition) and Russian artillery could slaughter Germans and Austrians without hindrance.

                    Heh heh heh ... the monarchist Shulgin prudently does not disclose the presence of these shells in the troops and the distribution of calibers. Due to the crisis on the train, these shells remained largely in the central warehouses - they were later shot to the start of the 50's.
                    In addition, the "average temperature in the hospital" was raised by 3 "shells (half of them were shrapnel), while 42-line guns, 48-line howitzers and 6" guns were experiencing a shortage of shells. But to break even field defense, an OFS with a caliber of at least 122 mm is needed.
                    In total, state-owned and private factories manufactured all kinds of shells for the army’s needs in 1914, 104 900, in 1915, 9 567 888, in 1916, 30 974 678, and in 1917, 24 413 552 shells, which amounted to total 65 061 018 shells of which 76-mm - 53 525 400.

                    Quote: semirek
                    It is a pity that at that time there was no structure to combat sabotage in the rear, otherwise we would have finished the war by 17.

                    No Cheka will be able to correct the lag in industry in a couple of years. The railway crisis didn’t happen because the evil capitalists did not want to produce rails, steam locomotives and wagons for the tsar’s tsar — ​​but because these factories or their allies were occupied with other orders for the front. Russia's industry simply did not have enough power reserve.
                    This lesson was taken into account by the Bolsheviks who replaced them - excessive redundancy has become the norm: mobilized materials, strength reserves of structures and mechanisms in factories, simplified mobilization models of weapons and equipment to reduce the load on industry.
                    1. -2
                      13 March 2015 18: 12
                      On the one hand, you are right: whether Russia is royal or Bolshevik or modern, it remains Russia and the next rulers must learn from the mistakes of their predecessors.
                      As for the discussion, my opinion is this: the Russian tsars were not fools and pushed their borders not just because of a whim, but from understanding the threat that comes from the west, so that in case of war give the long-hardening Russian man time to concentrate. during the three years of the Great War, Russia did not lose a single inch of its national lands. But in the next war, which turned out to be the unfinished previous us. by July of 42, 70 million of the population and everything else had lost ---- what is the effectiveness of the Bolshevik administration?
                      1. 0
                        13 March 2015 19: 15
                        Quote: semirek
                        Look: in the three years of the Great War, Russia did not lose a single tip of its national lands. But in the next war, which turned out to be the unfinished previous one. by July of 42, 70 million of the population and everything else had lost ---- what is the effectiveness of the Bolshevik administration?

                        The effectiveness is that we survived the second war with the Reich - in contrast, by the way, from the best army of the continent, winners in the last war with Germany. And unlike the Empire / Republic, which in WWI to 1917 stood out from the last forces. Even without the 1917 revolution, defeats at the front were inevitable. It is very difficult to fight without a normal transport from the rear. And it’s doubly more difficult - if your industry produces three to five times less than the enemy, who exactly at that time mobilized his industry in full.

                        It is also effective that after 4 years of the hardest war, the country did not devour itself from the inside and did not collapse like a house of cards from the slightest jolt. Moreover, the country still had enough strength to repay the Japanese a hundredfold and force the former Allies to postpone all their "unthinkable" plans on the back burner.
                      2. 0
                        13 March 2015 21: 09
                        You are talking nonsense and nonsense !!!!! On May 17, the tsarist General Staff planned a general offensive. Preparation was in full swing, and ammunition and ammunition were procured in sufficient quantities. Even the uniform, the famous budenovki, were prepared then. The Germans were already on the verge of defeat. they were bloodless, famine was already beginning in the country. In addition, special landing divisions were created for landing on the Bosphorus under the leadership of Kolchak. In short, the war should already end in the summer of 17! Russia became the winner and reaped the benefits in the form of access to the Bosphorus and the Balkans.
                        I also want to remind you that Russia also fought with Turkey and inflicted a number of serious defeats on it. While the British twice firmly received from the Turks. It's me that they were good warriors at that time.
                      3. +1
                        13 March 2015 22: 21
                        Quote: azkolt
                        You are talking nonsense and nonsense !!!!! On May 17, the tsarist General Staff planned a general offensive.

                        I apologize for the poverty of the syllable, but by May 2017, the tsarist General Staff had already become an institution, as they say, "laughing chickens." And not even because the generals and officers who were in him were bad strategists, operational managers or tacticians, but because the tsar was a real degenerate in 2017, 2014, and 2005! And the rest, subordinates, could either rebel (which few dared to do), or follow in the wake of the fluidly-made "supreme leadership", without being distracted by their own (sometimes, by the way, even outstanding) professional competence.
                        The words written by Gumilev about the Chinese Empire of Sui come to my mind: “The overwhelming majority of Chinese, strong and weak passions, strove for national upsurge and supported the principles of Sui, but the crowned degenerate paralyzed their efforts, and won the civil war of 614-619 ... "
                        Well, Nicholas could not win! The degenerate’s karma was like that! And even the genius of Brusilov, Kolchak and many others, even the heroism of the Russian soldiers could not overcome this!
                        All! The era is over!
                  2. 0
                    13 March 2015 20: 53
                    I wonder what the Red Army fought 4 of the Civil War.
                  3. 0
                    April 9 2015 19: 19
                    The only question is: why was it necessary to start this war at all? The next war was really both the Great and the Patriotic War - a liberation one - and this "great" one was a gamble - the soldiers repaid French loans with their lives, oh yes, the Dardanelles would have given us to occupy, maybe, then ... sort of like the Allies promised ... in words - that would have healed after "victory".
                2. 0
                  13 March 2015 21: 00
                  Dear, when you write, then specify that to famine in St. Petersburg! Yes, and it is difficult to call it hunger, there was not only white bread, black bread was in abundance. It was a provoked reason, for example, the reason for joining the EU in Ukraine. The "crisis technologists" developed and provoked it ... or do you really think that the people groaning under the heel of tsarism overthrew the damned regime with a powerful hand? My great-grandmother, who died in the 70s and who was about 100 years old, said that the peasants lived better under the tsar!
                  1. +1
                    14 March 2015 00: 26
                    My grandfather also spoke.
                  2. 0
                    14 March 2015 07: 23
                    azkolt
                    All your arguments about "victory", especially about the Bosphorus, are not worth a damn, for the reason that neither England nor France were in any way interested and would not have allowed this very "victory" under any pretext.
                    "Technologists of the crisis" - why are you all walking in circles, not wanting to see that such technology, with the notorious deficit of everything and everyone, was played by the Judas in the 90s of the last century in the Union? It is enough to read the cries of Gavrila Popov in 1989, about the creation deficit in the state trade and understand the technology that Gorbachev, using all the power of the state, brought down that very state.
                    RI-in the analogue, again shy to say that RI was overwhelmed by the aristocracy and Jewish gesheftmahmery, industrialists, merchants, whom the old system began to interfere with the development as they saw it.
                    So your grandmother, as an argument, is worth nothing, since her opinion is akin to the opinion of a mole crawled out under a bush, but reasoning about the forest as a whole.
                    And the maxim that under the tsar, peasants lived better — you didn’t make a mistake by resource? Such statements will be made somewhere for example at RAIN in the morning, but here, people are literate, they know where and how to look for confirmation or refutation of your speculation.
                    The surplus appraisal, BEGIN under Nicholas 2, probably from the fabulous life of the peasants, in a warring country with food the crisis in large industrial centers has come?
              3. -1
                13 March 2015 16: 48
                My question is: why did the Bolsheviks even need this power over Russia? why shoulder this overwhelming burden? for what? to make a world revolution? Do not tell people - money must be worked out including the Brest Peace (the most disgraceful world in Russian history).
                1. +2
                  13 March 2015 22: 31
                  Quote: semirek
                  My question is: why did the Bolsheviks even need this power over Russia? why shoulder this overwhelming burden? for what? to make a world revolution? Do not tell people - money must be worked out including the Brest Peace (the most disgraceful world in Russian history).

                  And you, when you write itDo you fully understand the objective reality of that moment?
                  If not - well, with whom does not happen.
                  If so, then I would really like to play the game with you. Handcuff you in a non-residential building intended for demolition, on the third floor, handcuffed to a ring embedded in the wall, hand out a hacksaw for metal, and put an explosive device weighing a kilogram in 300, with a timer for 5-8 minutes.
                  Be able to survive in such circumstances - excellent!
                  Do not be honored - so no shame, because "the dead have no shame!"

                  All this, of course, is indescribably unpleasant. But on the other hand, if suddenly (which is unlikely) you would have survived, you would have had every moral right to condemn the Brest Peace Treaty "from the high bell tower".
                  1. 0
                    14 March 2015 00: 23
                    And here is an interesting catch: why did you decide that Russia was on the verge of death more than Germany, I’m not talking about Austria-Hungary, on the eve of the Brest Peace, and of course the Bolsheviks greatly corrupted the Russian units with the murder of officers with their propaganda (understandable for why it was done) there were also strong fronts and units, for example, the Romanian front. In Germany at that time there was practically famine and simply collapse, and the Brest Peace was signed "in time", isn't that strange?
            2. +1
              13 March 2015 16: 40
              Dear, It is necessary to distinguish between different facts: you say that the surplus appraisal was introduced by Nikolai, but it is true that she also assumed the seizure of food and other goods necessary for the front (and the front of the Great War is comparable to the front of the Great Patriotic War), but the difference with the Bolshevik surplus surplus is that. that for the seized property they paid right away with money, unlike the robber-detachments.
          4. +1
            13 March 2015 13: 24
            Quote: Jaros81
            - transfer of Germany to Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltic states, exit from the Entente, which was regarded as a national betrayal;

            I still wildly apologize, but how then to regard Krasnov’s letter to Wilhelm? For a minute, an officer of the Russian army who does not recognize the Brest worlds there and does not leave the Entente, writes a letter to the head of the state formally at war with Russia, asking him to recognize the independence of the separatist formation he leads and help with weapons in exchange for getting out of the war and delivering food to Germany.
            The Ataman of our Winter Village at the court of Your Imperial Majesty is authorized by me to ask your Imperial Majesty recognize the rights of the Great Don Army to independent existence, and with the release of the last Kuban, Astrakhan and Terek troops and the North Caucasus, the right to independent existence of the entire federation under the name of the Don Caucasian Union.
            To ask your majesty to facilitate the accession to the Army for strategic reasons of the cities of Kamyshin and Tsaritsyn of the Saratov province and the city of Voronezh and the station Liski and Povorino and draw the border of the Don Army, as indicated on the map available in the Winter Village.
            To ask Your Majesty to exert pressure on the Soviet authorities of Moscow and force them to clear the limits of the All-Great Army of the Don and other powers that have entered the Don Caucus Union from the robber detachments of the Red Guard and give an opportunity to restore normal, peaceful relations between Moscow and the Don Army. All losses of the population of the Don, Trade and Industry Troops resulting from the invasion of the Bolsheviks should be compensated by Soviet Russia.
            Request Your Imperial Majesty to help our young state with guns, rifles, ammunition and engineering equipment and, if you recognize it as profitable, to establish within the framework of the Don Don Army gun, gun, shell and ammunition plants.
            The Great Don Army commits itself to the service of Your Imperial Majesty to observe complete neutrality during the world struggle of peoples and not to allow armed forces hostile to the German people on its territory, to which the ataman of the Astrakhan army, the prince Tundutov, and the Kuban government, and upon joining the rest of the Don Caucasus Union, gave their consent.
            The Great Don Army provides the German Empire the right to preferentially export excess to meet local needs of bread, grain and flour, leather goods and raw materials, wool, fish products, vegetable and animal fats and oils and products thereof, tobacco products and products, livestock and horses, grape wine and other gardening products and farmingin return, the German Empire will deliver agricultural machinery, chemicals and tanning extracts, expedition equipment for the procurement of government papers with an appropriate supply of materials, equipment for cloth, cotton, leather, chemical, sugar and other factories and electrical equipment.
            1. +1
              13 March 2015 21: 15
              You bring some strange letters! This letter was written when the Germans were already on the threshold of the Don troops launched there by the Bolsheviks. It’s strange for me to hear people who turn a blind eye to obvious facts !!!. The slogan of the Bolsheviks was the development of the imperialist war in the CIVIL. They did it! They signed the raunchy Brest Peace, having deleted Russia from the list of victors and plunged it into a bloody civil war. And these are facts, everything else is DEMAGOGY!
              1. +1
                14 March 2015 07: 25
                azkolt
                You now deign to deceive this stupidity out of ignorance?
                So you do not want to go to school, dear?
                Why then again, to engage in balabolstvo, telling myths to no one needed?
      2. -3
        13 March 2015 09: 47
        Do you have an understanding of what a civil war is, how it begins, how it goes and how it ends? Or didn’t they go beyond the school curriculum?
      3. +3
        13 March 2015 10: 05
        It was not the Bolsheviks who unleashed the Civil War, but took power from the ground from the puppet Provisional Government, which included those who had betrayed the Tsar. These traitors then led the White movement, openly sponsored by the Entente. The Cossacks kept themselves aloof from the rest of the Russian people, considering themselves "below dignity" to feel themselves on an equal footing with the "muzhik". With the abolition of the estates, the Cossacks rose. But not all. It turned out like in the rest of Russia - the rich and prosperous for the whites, and the poor and needy for the Reds. All the leaders of the White Cossacks then sided with Hitler. If we had been for Russia, we would not have gone against the common people for secession from the rest of Russia, and then for Hitler.
        1. -1
          13 March 2015 10: 30
          Right now patriots-Cossacks will bite you)))
        2. avt
          -1
          13 March 2015 10: 40
          Quote: UrraletZ
          , and picked up power from the earth from the puppet Provisional Government, which included those who betrayed the King.

          Well, yes - a fact.
          Quote: UrraletZ
          Not the Bolsheviks launched the Civil War,

          laughing You don’t seem to trust Lenin and his statement about the imperialist and its transfer to civilian?
          Quote: UrraletZ
          . With the abolition of the estates, the Cossacks rose.

          Well, what you! Here is the author of an article of a completely different opinion, well, in particular ------ ,, After the death of Ataman Karaulov, an unbearable struggle with the Bolshevik detachments that filled the region and the aggravation of controversial issues with neighbors - Kabardians, Chechens, Ossetians, Ingush - Terskoe The army was turned into a republic, which was part of the RSFSR. " wassat The picture of Donetsk airport is direct - cyborgs are on the defensive, and on them are crowds of Pskov paratroopers with Altai armored police and Kadyrov's Chechens.
          Quote: UrraletZ
          . All the leaders of the White Cossacks then acted on the side of Hitler. If they were for Russia, they would not go against the common people for separation from the rest of Russia, and then for Hitler.

          Well, let's put quite specific personalities who, like Vlasov, need to be given a clear assessment, without suggesting prodigals about Stalinism, Bolshevism and the "irreconcilable struggle with him."
        3. +9
          13 March 2015 10: 45
          You're not right. Not all White Cossacks and leaders of the white movement adopted the position of Nazi Germany. I will give only a part of them: Denikin A.I. (not a Cossack, but a white revered Cossack leader); Cossack lieutenant general Peter Pisarev; A native of the village of Lugansk region, Don troops
          General Baranov; general from the cavalry, ataman of the Don Troops Peter Popov; the commander of the 9th Don Brigade, Major General Fedor Markov; Lieutenant General Pavel Kusonsky. This is only part of the leaders of the White Cossacks who not only did not accept Nazi Germany, many of them fought with Nazi Germany, but on the side of either the French resistance or the English army. You can’t blame unfoundedly. You need to know history, but you need to love the history of your country!
          1. +3
            13 March 2015 13: 34
            Quote: Free Cossack
            You're not right. Not all White Cossacks and leaders of the white movement adopted the position of Nazi Germany.

            The statement about the massive nature of the transition of the Cossacks to the side of the German army in World War II - Lying! In reality, only a few atamans took the side of the enemy, and on the side of the Red Army fought Cossack cavalry divisions, 40 Cossack cavalry regiments, 5 tank regiments, 8 mortar regiments and divisions, 2 anti-aircraft regiment and a number of other units, all of which were fully staffed. Several Cossack tanks were built with the money of the Cossacks - “Don Co-Operator”, “Don Cossack” and “Osoaviahimovets Don”.
            For their accomplishments and heroism, shown in battles with the enemy, thousands of Cossacks were awarded military orders and medals, and 262 Cossacks became Heroes of the Soviet Union.
            1. +1
              13 March 2015 17: 28
              Only one battle near Kushchevskaya means what it means. But Lionz, too, is not sucked out of his finger.
          2. +2
            13 March 2015 18: 25
            Respected! A.I. Denikin --- Honorary Cossack - this title was awarded by the grateful residents of the villages of the Don for their liberation from the Bolsheviks.
            Many don’t know that there weren’t any volunteers in the Don, and don’t be free from the Bolsheviks. It was the volunteers who liberated the villages from the Bolsheviks during their base in Rostov and during the Ice Campaign, since the Cossacks no longer had moral or physical strength for this.
        4. -1
          13 March 2015 17: 16
          Unfortunately, dear, you are wrong: the Provisional Government was temporary for the period of the election of the Constituent Assembly (at which the future of Russia should be determined: its structure and principles of land management) and it did not have special powers to conduct state affairs. After the democratic elections to the Constituent Assembly that all Russia was looking forward to --- the Bolsheviks know that they are shining from the power of 17 percent, and they will not see the majority in principle, they organize a coup and seize power, they play a farce in the Tauride Palace.
        5. 0
          13 March 2015 17: 24
          Denikin is the grandson of the serf, Kornilov the son of Kalmyk and Cossack, Kolchak the son of a naval officer ---- something does not seem rich for white, and the workers of Izhevsk and Votkinsk from the famous Izhevsk division under the command of General Molchanov, who fought in white ranks with a red banner ---- here, brother is not so simple as it seems.
        6. +1
          13 March 2015 21: 20
          The Bolsheviks did not pick up, but took power from the Provisional Government by force. In January, an alternate meeting was to be held, which would deal with issues of further power. And what kind of power should be in the country should have been decided by the people by means of plebescite. I understand your brains were thoroughly cleared during the Soviet regime, but that's why they were brains to turn them on, especially now there is a lot of information about that time. I recommend reading Sutton's book "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution"
      4. bombardir
        +2
        13 March 2015 13: 23
        Quote: Jaros81
        Lenin said: "Let's turn the imperialist war into a civil war"
        Yeah, he said, there are only a couple of nuances: it was said in the 14 year and addressed to the citizens of ALL warring states - this is the first.
        And the second:
        when Lenin speaks of the destruction of the family, he speaks of the destruction of the BOURGEOISE family, and not the family as such;
        when Lenin speaks of the destruction of nations, he speaks of the destruction of bourgeois nations, i.e. the bourgeois constituent nation — the class of the bourgeoisie;
        when Lenin speaks of the annihilation of the kulaks or the nobility — he does not speak of physical annihilation, but of their annihilation as classes — everything comes down to a class approach.

        When Lenin speaks of a civil war, he does not speak of a war where everyone will knead everyone, but of a class war, that soldiers, workers and peasants stop shooting at each other and hate each other, turn bayonets towards their exploiters , their governments, and would force them to abandon capitalism, which is robbery, extortion and fascism in one bottle (will the civil class war enter the hot phase in this case, or will opponents of the new government give a word that they will not interrupt it and go with peace m - deal 10-e)

        but before civil
        Started with "Ice Campaign"

        and it was the Bolsheviks and Lenin who brought the famine
        And the underdevelopment of the farms for the 17 year — are these also Bolsheviks?
        And the famine in Poland, Germany, the United States in the same periods-also the Bolsheviks?
        1. +1
          13 March 2015 18: 34
          Let me ask you, dear, what is the actual underdevelopment of agriculture in Russia in 17? 100mln tons then, and 100mln now - maybe now underdevelopment in Russia? And I'm interested because my grandfather has a Stolypin migrant in Altai - and I know a lot about that time.
          1. bombardir
            +1
            13 March 2015 19: 21
            Quote: semirek
            maybe now underdevelopment in Russia?
            Now definitely, especially in terms of cattle breeding.

            In Russia in the 1913 year, 30,3 pounds of grain were collected per capita, then in the USA - 64,3 pounds, in Argentina - 87,4 pounds, in Canada - 121 pounds. Thus, in collecting grain per capita, the United States was two times ahead of tsarist Russia, Argentina was three times ahead, and Canada was four times ahead.
            http://www.situation.ru/app/j_art_164.htm
      5. +1
        13 March 2015 22: 00
        Quote: Jaros81
        ... but it was the Bolsheviks who unleashed the civil war. They bear most of the responsibility. Lenin ...

        Lenin, if that, not having at the start no resources managed win.
        And millions of "khataskrayniks" only have to die or kiss the boots of his divisional commanders and brigades.
        The only question is - where did these divisional commanders and brigades (together with divisions and brigades) come from? After all, Lenin, as we remember, actually started from scratch!
        In terms of understanding this, I was most impressed by Makhno's Memories, My Life by Trotsky (Bronstein) and Essays on Russian Troubles by Denikin.
        Already only these works are enough to understand a lot!
        The correct answer is: "The Bolsheviks honestly deserve victory! All others honestly deserve defeat!" Well, what wouldоLater, Stalin let most of the "Bolsheviks who deserved the victory" go into a spray - this is even more honest! But to understand such details, one already needs to read documents about the history of the French Revolution (which for most of the plus and minus people is a completely excessive, unattainable intellectual effort).
      6. +2
        16 March 2015 15: 20
        No, the civilians began the generals released by the Bolsheviks on parole - the Ice Campaign in March 1918. Cossacks practically did not participate in this campaign. There were two pages about the Civil War in your history textbook, and half of them were pictures, sir.
      7. 0
        16 March 2015 15: 49
        No, the Civils were launched by the generals, released on parole by the Bolsheviks, - by the Ice Campaign in March 1918. Don Cossacks did not participate in it. In your history textbook, sir, there were two pages about the Civil War, of which half the area was used for pictures.
    2. +3
      13 March 2015 09: 30
      Himself = you do not smell very well.
    3. Wii
      0
      13 March 2015 11: 09
      And what in those dashing years in the minds of people was a complete blanket, as a result they beat each other .. the father of his son, etc. ...
    4. +1
      13 March 2015 21: 47
      Quote: Darkness
      Yes Yes Yes.
      Bolsheviks are bad
      Cossacks (white) are good.
      The article somehow does not smell good.

      The Cossacks clearly showed everyone who knows how to listen (or read) what "Makhnovshchina", "Maidan", "circle", etc. are!
      The fact that they were then given decossackization is extremely deserved! This is just some kind of unprecedented manifestation of "the highest heavenly justice" right on earth!
      Don't know how to decide on a leader? Are you sure that "your hut is on the edge"? "Sword in the ground"?
      Excellent! It is you who will be slammed second / tenth / hundredth / thousandth after the leader you betrayed! Yes Yes exactly! They will take, nah, outside the outskirts, and spank from the three-line, or from the "revolutionary Mauser"! And, strictly speaking, they will do absolutely right! After all, this is exactly what should be done with such "personalities" at the turning points of history!
      Dear fellow citizens! Read the story! Go deep, try to understand how the world works!
      The Cossacks, "volunteers", "Bolsheviks", "Kolchakites", "Wrangelites", and many others in 1917-1922 showed us wonderful, simply reference historical examples! And "as it should" and "as not necessary"!
      Any smart person will learn the right lessons from all this!
  3. +2
    13 March 2015 07: 59
    The origin of the white movement.

    About the birth of the White movement, it is worth reading the memoirs of one of the founders of this movement - A. I. Denikin, who stood at the very origins.
  4. +5
    13 March 2015 08: 26
    The author is wonderful. Pearls in the style: "... the destructive ideas of Bolshevism ..." characterize him very much.
    Instead of a neutral position, Sergei Volgin takes one of the sides of the conflict he describes. In my opinion, the article from this becomes one-sided and loses a lot.
    1. +3
      13 March 2015 09: 34
      Not true. For decades, the Soviet agitprom poured dirt on the Russian Cossacks and its true role in defending the borders of Russia and military Cossack valor. It is time to fully pay tribute to our glorious ancestors.
      1. +2
        13 March 2015 09: 45
        Cho really? But can you tell me who supported the countries of the Entente, and later Hitler?
        White or red?
        1. +4
          13 March 2015 10: 29
          And do not tell me who started the genocide against the Russian people in 1917 year? And who destroyed the entire class of our people? And not just the Cossacks.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. bombardir
            +1
            13 March 2015 13: 42
            Quote: Georg Shep
            But can you tell me who started the genocide against the Russian people in 1917?
            Genocide (from the Greek. Genos - clan - tribe and Latin caedo - kill) - actions aimed at the complete or partial physical destruction of a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.

            So can you enlighten - who and for what purpose in the 17 year in Russia physically destroyed people on a national (Russian) basis?

            And who destroyed the whole estates of our people? And not just the Cossacks.
            Are you a supporter of the caste system? Maybe in the serfs do not mind?
      2. +5
        13 March 2015 10: 24
        Georg Shep "Russian Cossacks and their true role."
        Interestingly, the author will touch upon the true role of the Cossacks in the civil war in defeating the entire white movement?))))) Will he cover the Kuban and Don separatism, which played a key role in this defeat?)))) I don’t like the bombastic phrases about heroic, impeccable Cossacks and white officers.))) People were different, they fought in different ways. Former Red Army soldiers who switched to white or Cossacks of Budyonny’s cavalry army.))) There were cowardly officers waiting for them))) ... there was a brave student youth from the white.))) Etc. The Civil War in Russia is not a black and white chessboard.) )) This is a colored canvas, a palette like anyone else.
        WHO DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THIS AND TILL TIME RAISES Tears ON ONE OF THE PARTIES - THERE IS NEEDED TO BE LIMITED.)))) IT IS SIMPLE TO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS WAR IS A TRAGIC PAGE OF HISTORY OF OUR MOTHERLAND. Everyone was good there.))) I equally respect the white and red commanders.))) It’s the generals, that is, those who led the regiments into battle. I DO NOT CONSIDER WORTHY TUKHACHEVSKY, ANNENKOV WELCOME. AND EVEN THOSE WHO BECOME TRANSFERRED TO FASCIS TYPE KRASNOV. If we analyze the history of the civil war, then we must consider everything in a complex, without snot and angry howl about what kind of Russia we lost.)))) If we consider military operations, then we identify the errors of both sides, identify the reasons for the successes and failures of different parties . Let's continue to understand these difficult pages of our history, but only calmly, without shortcuts and whining.
        1. 0
          13 March 2015 10: 32
          I agree, perhaps.
        2. bombardir
          +1
          13 March 2015 13: 52
          Quote: Nagaibak
          The civil war in Russia is not a black and white chessboard. This is a colored canvas, a palette like anyone else.
          It depends on the subject of the assessment: if you evaluate situations taken out of the general context, the actions of individuals, pay attention to particulars, immersed in emotions, then yes - it is.
          Not if you look globally and evaluate GOALS - only black and white remains.
          1. 0
            13 March 2015 16: 46
            bombardir "Not if you look globally and evaluate the GOAL - only black and white remains."
            What are your global goals?)))) I clearly wrote in my opinion.)))
  5. +5
    13 March 2015 09: 31
    During the February rebellious movement in Petrograd, the Cossacks took a neutral position and remained outside spectators of the unfolding events.
    The author did not wonder why, according to his words, the Cossacks remained outside viewers? If the author undertakes to cover this topic, then it is necessary to begin its coverage with reasons! And the main reason for the 1917 revolution is the land issue! The country was agricultural and the bulk of the population lived in villages. The Stolypin reform was precisely aimed at solving the problem of landless peasants in the overpopulated European part of Russia. The Cossacks had the same problems, they were especially acute among the Don and Kuban. So, the article is not a minus from me. As they say: the topic is not fully disclosed. hi
    1. +1
      13 March 2015 10: 29
      Gomunkul "And the main reason for the 1917 revolution is the land issue! The country was agrarian and the bulk of the population lived in villages."
      Maybe this is not interesting to the people?))) Many seriously believe that the Russian people of that time lived in chocolate, and then the Bolsheviks came and ruined everything.))))
      1. +2
        13 March 2015 11: 48
        Maybe this is not interesting to the people?))) Many seriously believe that the Russian people of that time lived in chocolate, and then the Bolsheviks came and ruined everything.))))
        That is why it is impossible to treat "superficially" the study of the civil war of 1918-1922. Please note that in time it lasted no less than the Great Patriotic War, and this can only mean one thing: the contradictions within the country were too deep and what kind of sponsors were financing this war. Even now, we see on the example of Ukraine who wants peace and who wants war. A century has passed, and the sponsors of that war are ready today to plunge Russia through Ukraine into the chaos of a civil war. hi
      2. The comment was deleted.
  6. +4
    13 March 2015 09: 47
    AUTHOR, and so:
    Nikolka. Why is there no shooting?
    Myshlaevsky. Quietly, politely go. And without any fight!
    Lariosik. And most importantly, most surprisingly, everyone is happy, even the bourgeois undercut. Until then, Petlyura was tired of everyone!
    Nikolka. I wonder how the Bolsheviks look?
    Myshlaevsky. See, see.

    Interestingly, the Cossacks are now mainly shown in the White Movement, but it is worth reading "Quiet Don", but it is a novel, but nevertheless, the author is an eyewitness
    And in the cavalry of Budyonny and other cavalry. parts of the SC of workers from factories, I think there were not many, the number of Cossacks was IMHO - almost everything!
    Somehow everything is one-sided, for fans of the White movement.
    1. 0
      13 March 2015 10: 00
      The author does not understand what a civil war is.
    2. 0
      13 March 2015 10: 38
      You forget that after the legendary raid of K.K. Mamontov on the rear of the Reds in July 19go --- Trotsky issued an order: the proletarian-mounted horse, which resulted in the formation of red, mounted armies.
      1. +1
        13 March 2015 11: 07
        Of course, I understand that in addition to horses, there were armored trains, cars, armored cars, artillery, and machine guns in the Horse Army. I think that proletarians necessarily served in the cavalry units. It is in parts. And on a horse, they could learn to ride .... a matter of time and how to learn (quality)?
  7. +3
    13 March 2015 10: 04
    Some noodles in the author’s head.
    It should start with the fact that the Cossacks in the civil war are all traitors, at first the tsarist government - becoming neutral in the February coup, then Russia - becoming allies of the Western interventionists.
    Again, the "white terror" of the author somehow did not settle in his head ... well, the first concentration camps, gangs of white "free Cossacks".
    Involvement in the hopeless First World War is it the fault of the "red"? Duck, the Cossacks would march in formation against it and defend the borders, and not sit their asses at home.
    1. avt
      +1
      13 March 2015 10: 54
      Quote: report4
      Some noodles in the author’s head.

      No. The author is quite clearly determined to cut out of modern Russia "Cossackia" according to Krasnov's behest and Kuchma's method - "Cossacks, I am not Russia." Hence all this pastoral with "heavenly", well, just an angelically pure army "guarding the frontiers", trampled into the mud by hordes of alien orcs - Bolsheviks, who supported them by local "nonresident" and other nationalities. And what happens when, one small, but proud bird said - "Personally, I will fly right into the Sun!" "The author can see in today's Ukraine There, too, the Russians are to blame, and Putin specifically, as well as Kadyrov's Chechens.
      1. 0
        13 March 2015 12: 41
        avt ,, Cossacks I am not Russia ". Hence all this pastoral with" heavenly ", well, straight angelically pure army guarding the frontiers, trampled into the mud by hordes of alien orcs - Bolsheviks, who supported them by local" nonresident "and other nationalities"
        AWT Respect !!!))) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++
        ++
  8. +1
    13 March 2015 10: 18
    The article was clearly written by an amateur --- collected from pieces of different "works", different authors. There are so many inaccuracies, for example: the author claims that the ataman of the Semirechye Cossacks was the ataman Annenkov --- this is not so, Annenkov was the commander of the Semirechye front, and Ionov: There are also inaccuracies with Mironov.
  9. 0
    13 March 2015 10: 38
    Then the Russian Orthodox Church again excelled.
    They restored the memorial to Krasnov with a company in the territory of the Church of All Saints on the Falcon.
    The policy of the Russophobic ROC is becoming more understandable
    1. +3
      13 March 2015 12: 41
      Not much is wrong, the name is the "Reconciliation of Nations" Memorial at the Cathedral of All Saints on the Falcon.

      But then .... just a song: A symbolic tombstone to the White generals, Cossack chieftains and the German anti-Nazi general Helmut von Pannwitz was created by a group of WWII veterans in 1998 and was erected at the All Saints Church with the blessing of Archbishop Tikhon Bronnitsky - rector of this Temple 1995-2000 years.

      Just sobbing with emotion and words, anti-Nazi general :))))))))

      Threat Gloom - You are already minus a sergeant (in the article about Evpatiy Kolovrat there were minus corporal) ... and by the way, who is more minus corporal or minus sergeant?
      1. +1
        13 March 2015 12: 50
        Here is the memorial. By the way, is it not time for Vlasov to set?
        1. Asily 50
          +2
          13 March 2015 21: 39
          What kind of cap is there? Oath: to the king, temporary, British, Americans. With every oath I received another rank from the owners. Tales of an idealist struggling with ....., utter stupidity. A very gifted and talented person, but no citizen. Realized and accepted the execution. I read what is available from interrogations * in the dungeons *. Awareness of involvement in the destruction of their Fatherland, their ideals of service.
        2. Asily 50
          0
          13 March 2015 21: 39
          What kind of cap is there? Oath: to the king, temporary, British, Americans. With every oath I received another rank from the owners. Tales of an idealist struggling with ....., utter stupidity. A very gifted and talented person, but no citizen. Realized and accepted the execution. I read what is available from interrogations * in the dungeons *. Awareness of involvement in the destruction of their Fatherland, their ideals of service.
          1. +1
            14 March 2015 00: 40
            Trotsky, after all, also came from America - perhaps he also swore allegiance to someone, not for nothing that he promised to give Kamchatka to the Americans.
  10. +3
    13 March 2015 10: 53
    Quote: UrraletZ
    All the leaders of the White Cossacks then acted on the side of Hitler

    Well, yes, especially Denikin, there was such a direct fascist that I couldn’t directly
  11. 0
    13 March 2015 10: 54
    Again, the "white terror
    And the red terror in your head did not postpone?
    1. 0
      13 March 2015 11: 22
      There was red terror and white. This is normal for a civil war.
    2. 0
      13 March 2015 17: 37
      Speaking of terror: read S. Melgunov in 1922 in the original "Red Terror in Russia" --- and everything will fall into place.
  12. Asily 50
    +6
    13 March 2015 11: 12
    But how to correlate the ideals of the white movement with the division of Russia? Service for the money of the interventionists? All white movement is another desire to secure * a true piece of land * at least a piece of land with slaves. In this context, it is interesting to read Deniken’s memoirs, he only stated that RUSSIA was not the estate of the Romanovs and quickly ceased to be a reliable fighter against Bolshevism. It is interesting to look into the temporarily political treaties of the temporary Entente. Publications abroad are somehow not credible. The temporary ones look too disgusting in them, as if they are justifying themselves for the betrayal of the temporary, now the same thing is happening in Ukraine. Already declare a revision of relations in the light of deception * of the community * in the West. There is a fait accompli that the Tsar was overthrown by the richest and most influential * Russians *, everyone has their own motives, from idealistic (as they later wrote about themselves) to frankly selfish, or for payment. And all discussions about white idealists about their * Wishlist * in no way correlate with their deeds.
  13. 0
    13 March 2015 11: 20
    economic reasons, the first decree of the Soviet government back in 17 was the Decree on Land, when each peasant could take as much land for himself as he could cultivate, for the peasants of Russia this was a decisive factor in supporting the Bolsheviks. The Cossacks, however, never had problems with obtaining and cultivating land, and therefore did not support it. By the way, the civil war began precisely with the fact that the representatives of the "white" movement decided to prove by force that they did not agree with the decrees of the Red government, so think about who unleashed it. It's just that the Bolsheviks did not wipe themselves off and "disproportionately applied force" like Russia in Georgia in 2008)) Well, it started, so who's to blame ???
    1. -2
      13 March 2015 12: 07
      Unfortunately you are wrong. Let me explain: - yes, the Bolsheviks issued a decree on land, which, from the moment of its announcement, has been in effect for only a full two years. First there was the surplus appropriation system, which turned all the barns of the poor peasants inside out, and then collectivization, which completely "killed" all the thoughts of the peasantry about land; - who exactly unleashed the civil war can now be argued to the point of hoarseness. But the facts are as follows: the country is at the stage of war with Germany and Austria-Hungary; in the country, the interim government first comes to power and issues the treacherous Decree No. 1; chaos and desertion begin in the army; troops loyal to the OWN, based on which the Cossacks continue to wage war with Germany, and in addition, units are diverted to suppress uprisings in the capital and cities, but do not have time; As a result of an armed coup, the Bolsheviks come to power; The regular army, based on the Cossacks (I repeat), does not recognize the new government and, torn between two fires, decides to restore order in the country and return the legitimate power. It's kind of brief. Now put yourself in their place and think, what would you do?
      1. +1
        13 March 2015 13: 28
        Quote: Free Cossack
        troops loyal to the Oath, the basis of which the Cossacks continue to wage war with Germany, and in addition to this, units are distracted by the suppression of uprisings in the capital and cities, but do not have time; As a result of the armed coup, the Bolsheviks came to power; The regular army, based on which the Cossacks (I repeat) does not recognize the new government and is torn between two fires, decides to restore order in the country and return legal power.

        Ahem ... and what oath was the ataman Krasnov loyal to when he wrote a letter to Emperor Wilhelm asking him to acknowledge the dismemberment of Russia and the secessionist formation he led in exchange for Krasnov’s refusal of all Entente agreements (the Don Army became neutral and began to deliver to Germany food)?
        1. 0
          13 March 2015 14: 06
          Yes, I do not argue, but he wrote this letter already on June 28, 1918, and in March of the same year, the Brest-Litovsk Peace Treaty was signed by the Bolsheviks, i.e. the army practically does not exist, and the state has not existed for almost a year, well, so on. etc. I do not in any way justify it. And in general I am not trying to convince anyone that white Cossacks are white and fluffy, and red demons. I just argue based on historical realities. If you remember (from history, of course), the bulk of the Cossacks took Bolshevik power in 1917, but in connection with the "Red Terror" already at the beginning of 1918. there was a Cossack revolt that quickly overthrew the Bolshevik regime, and note this without the participation of the White Volunteer Army. Again, if you remember (from history, of course), it was the Cossack troops, without the participation of the White Volunteer Army, having driven the Red Army to the borders of the Don Army, intended not to continue further hostilities in Russia. But then the White Volunteer Army merged with the Don Army, and the former began to rule the latter. And then it happened, what happened.
          1. +2
            13 March 2015 15: 45
            Quote: Free Cossack
            Yes, I don’t argue, but he wrote this letter already on 28 of June 1918 of the year, and in March of that year the Bolsheviks signed the Brest-Litovsk Peace, i.e. the army practically does not exist, and the state has not existed for almost a year, well, etc. etc.

            So it’s all the Bolsheviks did. And Krasnov is a Russian officer, who by default should be for one and indivisible. smile
            Even separatism of the Cossacks in general, and Krasnov in particular, even repeatedly complained.
            Quote: Free Cossack
            Again, if you remember (from history, of course), it was the Cossack troops, without the participation of the Volunteer White Army, having driven the Red Army to the borders of the Don Army, that intended not to continue further hostilities in Russia. But then the Volunteer White Army merged with the Don Army, and the former began to control the latter. Then what happened is what happened.

            The merger there was rather arbitrary. Again, Deninkin complained that the All-Great Army not only did not provide him with reinforcements, but also selected those Cossacks who were already in units subordinate to him. And when the Cossacks began to dictate a strategy (demanding from Denikin to support the strike on Tsaritsyn - Krasnov’s dream, judging by the letter) and tried to put a paw on Drozdovtsy ...
            The most complications were caused by the issue with the detachment of Colonel Drozdovsky. Arriving in Novocherkassk on April 25, Drozdovsky informed me on the same day that "the detachment had arrived at my disposal" and "was awaiting orders." But as time went on, the 2nd Kuban campaign was brewing, and the beginning of it all had to be postponed: more than a third of the entire army - Drozdovsky's brigade - remained in Novocherkassk. This circumstance prevented its organizational merger with the army, violated all my calculations and did not make it possible to prepare the operation, which was agreed upon with General Krasnov on May 15 [meeting in Manychskaya]. At the request of Krasnov, Drozdovsky's detachment was scattered across the region: the cavalry fought in the Salsk district, the infantry was used to "cleanse the Bolsheviks" of Rostov and Novocherkassk on punitive expeditions to the peasant villages in the north of the region. I demanded to join the brigade; Drozdovsky petitioned for a delay for rest, organization and replenishment. Krasnov begged Drozdovsky not to leave Novocherkassk - publicly, at the parade in front of the formation, and more intimately in personal conversations with Drozdovsky.

            The most terrible enemy of the White Movement in the first couple of years was precisely the internal enemy - the inability to set a common goal and set aside its internal showdowns and local interests in the name of this goal.
            Actually, this was one of the main reasons for the Reds victory - with all the factionalism of the Red movement, the principle "if the Bolshevik party made a decision, then it must be implemented"with a creak, but acted. For after failure to comply, a good comrade in leather, on an armored train, with faithful nukers could come and arrange a revolutionary show with purges and decimations.
            1. 0
              13 March 2015 16: 33
              The most terrible enemy of the White Movement in the first couple of years was precisely the internal enemy - the inability to set a common goal and set aside its internal showdowns and local interests in the name of this goal And you know, I agree with you. The lack of specific goals, a mess in staffing, the reluctance of most front-line Cossacks to continue the war away from their farms and villages, and ultimately led to their defeat.
  14. Asily 50
    -4
    13 March 2015 13: 20
    The real Cossacks took place as * defenders of the fatherland * only in literature. In reality, Cossack * brothers * for a denyuzhka small hired to rob, namely to rob anyone. The tsarist government, having strengthened, hired robbery professionals to rob neighbors, to distract from its territory. Those who did not agree to the hiring, the Cossacks and part of the Donetsk people, were destroyed. The predatory instincts remained, the First World War showed it in all its glory. Civil also allowed to dream of impunity robbery. And as we crushed the Cossacks, foreign advisers, weapons and the government appeared at once. And all in debt.
  15. 1z1961gjgjd
    0
    13 March 2015 14: 14
    After all, EVERYTHING is quite simple, the Cossacks are anarchists by nature. The revolution of 1917 did not bring "WILL" to the Don, unlike the rest of Russia, the Don had the most democratic self-government, perhaps even more developed than it is now. The motto: "For God, Tsar and Fatherland" for the Cossacks was not a simple expression, but personified the Cossacks. The war of 1914 showed the rottenness of the regime, and the tsar's refusal from the throne introduced confusion in the minds of the Cossacks.
    1. 0
      13 March 2015 15: 48
      Quote: 1z1961gjgjd
      After all, everything is quite simple, Cossacks by nature are anarchists

      Before writing about the fact that the Cossacks are anarchists, bother to clarify for yourself what anarchy is.
      1. 1z1961gjgjd
        0
        17 March 2015 18: 12
        For your information, what is anarchy Kropotkin studied the issue of 1907 g price 0,7cop.
        And I consider myself an anarchist myself, I advise you to read what genuine anarchism is.
  16. 0
    13 March 2015 16: 25
    If the topic is about the Cossacks of those years --- do not forget about such a moment:
    1. +2
      13 March 2015 16: 49
      semirek "If the topic is about the Cossacks of those years, don't forget about this moment."
      Take these people, put on them budenovki and also do not forget about this moment. And then the white did not shoot anyone.))) And the Cossacks sometimes chopped.))))
      1. -2
        13 March 2015 18: 49
        When terror becomes a national ideology in relation to half of the country's population who do not profess Bolshevik, or maybe no principles at all, then this state can be called criminal. At least there was no cannibalistic ideology --- to destroy all those who are against them. said from the leaders of the White Cause - if we fought and thought like red, we would not be white.
        1. 0
          13 March 2015 19: 35
          Quote: semirek
          When terror becomes a national ideology in relation to half of the country's population who do not profess Bolshevik, or maybe no principles at all, then this state can be called criminal.

          What horrors are you telling.
          Could you tell me - and how is the total gold-raiding in the Red Headquarters of the Civil War combined with the ideology of "total terror against all who do not profess Bolshevik ideas" declared by you?
          1. -2
            13 March 2015 21: 34
            Let me tell you, as I tell you, it turned out that illiterate soldiers cannot command armies, and what should I do? you just need to take the former officers (whom your own soldiers did not have time to kill) and force them to serve on the Reds, all the more so since the latter actually had no special choice.
      2. 0
        13 March 2015 19: 01
        Peasants are state criminals!
        "Far from everyone, the peasants understand that free trade in grain is a crime against the state: I produced grain; this is my product, and I have the right to trade: this is how the peasant thinks, habitually, old-fashioned.
        And we say that this is a state crime.
        Lenin 19 November 1919
        (Lenin V.I., complete.soch.t.39 p.315)
        This is the spirit of the time --- the whole essence of the Bolshevik regime.
        1. +2
          13 March 2015 19: 14
          The essence of the Bolshevik regime? Hmm ... .. well, they endured civil and devastation. Something they managed to do in 19 years .... not so much ... they just restored the country, built cities and heavy industry, overcame illiteracy, and built an army. As Stalin defined: they are 50 years behind, a breakthrough is needed. They fought again, again with all of Europe. They won. Then restored. ALL. We are invaders, but yes we capture and build roads, hospitals, cities, and industry.
          Is it the whole essence of the Bolshevik, communist or what kind of regime is it?
          1. -2
            13 March 2015 21: 19
            Quote: Severomor
            The essence of the Bolshevik regime? Hmm ... .. well, they endured civil and devastation. Something they managed to do in 19 years .... not so much ... they just restored the country, built cities and heavy industry, overcame illiteracy, and built an army. As Stalin defined: they are 50 years behind, a breakthrough is needed. They fought again, again with all of Europe. They won. Then restored. ALL. We are invaders, but yes we capture and build roads, hospitals, cities, and industry.
            Is it the whole essence of the Bolshevik, communist or what kind of regime is it?

            And at what cost? not interested by accident? at the cost of the liquidation of the Russian peasantry, as such, the liquidation of Russian thinking and the Russian way of life for the sake of the celebrated internationalism.
            And where are the Russian people and the Russian spirit now, and how did the Caucasian and Asian "brothers" thank us in the 90s, and where are your vaunted Bolshevik communists?
            1. +1
              13 March 2015 22: 10
              semirek
              For two comments, about the same thing, is it too lazy to insert?

              PRICE say?

              And what price did your white Cossacks make, and then the SS Cossacks, with all the rabble in Europe, pay that price.

              If it were not for your white rabble, but the Nazi invasion, such as you and your kind, it would be unlikely that they would carry any nonsense on the Internet, the media and TV.
              What have you proposed and done, the heirs of the traditions of the WHITE and the NATIONS, who defeated the country in 90? What are your successes in LOSS in people, comparable to the losses in World War II along with the Civil and World War I, losses in industry, agriculture, are comparable with losses in the war with Hitler, but only in power in 909, turned out to be like you and you like loafers and drones of a liberal (white-blue with a brown blot) color.

              Nothing lasts forever, but your age, in Russia, turns out to be so short, you are already hardly accepted, and even the heirs of the SS-Cossacks, other rabble, will play out completely, you will have to carry out reorganization in society, the sky will seem like a sheepskin to you. .
              1. -3
                13 March 2015 22: 45
                Don’t depart from the topic, topic: Cossacks in a civil war --- I think your agony has already begun, you come out with saliva /
                1. +2
                  13 March 2015 22: 48
                  The theme is SIMPLE like five cents.
                  The PEOPLE, united in the Red Army, drove your whole flock to hell out of the country.
                  Then, now you’re starting out on pus, bubbling up in vain hope to justify the killers who served in the White rabble armies.
                  The story took place the way it did, and no matter how you fuss about it, you won’t change it; the punishers of Semenov, Dutov, Krasnov, Mamantov and other Ungerns are still remembered.
          2. 0
            13 March 2015 22: 01
            Quote: Severomor
            The essence of the Bolshevik regime? Hmm ... .. well, they endured civil and devastation. Something they managed to do in 19 years .... not so much ... they just restored the country, built cities and heavy industry, overcame illiteracy, and built an army. As Stalin defined: they are 50 years behind, a breakthrough is needed. They fought again, again with all of Europe. They won. Then restored. ALL. We are invaders, but yes we capture and build roads, hospitals, cities, and industry.
            Is it the whole essence of the Bolshevik, communist or what kind of regime is it?

            And at what cost were they not interested by chance? The Russian people paid very dearly for these Bolshevik experiments: the Russian peasantry disappeared as such, the Russian spirit and the Russian way of life disappeared. Instead of raising the standard of living of the Russian people ---- raised Asia and the Caucasus from feudalism, which us and "thanked" in the 90s.
            1. bombardir
              +1
              14 March 2015 01: 22
              Quote: semirek
              the Russian spirit and the Russian way of life disappeared
              Are you talking about bast shoes, illiteracy, forced work for an uncle, and monstrous (especially childish) mortality?
        2. The comment was deleted.
  17. +1
    13 March 2015 18: 15
    Quote: semirek
    If the topic is about the Cossacks of those years --- do not forget about such a moment:

    "Talking" began even under the reign of Ataman Krasnov, who set the task to destroy all supporters of Soviet power. The corresponding decree against the Red Cossacks was adopted by the Don Rescue Circle in May 1918, almost a year before the directive of the Organizing Bureau of the Central Committee of the RCP.
    According to documented materials of the Special Investigation Commission for the Investigation of the Bolshevik Atrocities, the number of people shot by the Reds in the second half of the 1918 — 1919 years. in the territory of the Don, Kuban and Stavropol troops amounted to 5 598 people, of which 3 442 people were shot in the Don, 2 142 people - in the Kuban and in the Stavropol Territory. In the same period, during the white terror conducted under the regime of Krasnov, according to various sources, from 25 to 40 thousands of Cossacks were destroyed.
    1. -1
      13 March 2015 21: 06
      And more about these data.
      1. 0
        13 March 2015 22: 19
        semirek
        Remind me of Operation Killhol?
        Remind who these executioners were?
        Or do you seriously believe that this rabble is worthy of respect and memory?
        Are you trying to write these criminals who called themselves Cossacks who served the Nazis as "heroes"?
        The Jude were so dead, even the British did not bother about this rabble.
        1. +1
          13 March 2015 22: 40
          Where did I say that? Please quote
  18. Asily 50
    +1
    13 March 2015 18: 32
    Oh, what a picture. Cossacks to be shot, women at home, bury. After the Kaledinians, Mamontovites, and other Russian guardians, there was no one to bury, they were cut out by entire families. And then they are not surprised at the love of the Cossacks. By the way, the estate * Cossack * nation identified, from here and their hatred of RUSSIAN people. In the 1905 year, barricades in Moscow arose when the Cossacks entered the city, and what they did - * Mitkov * do not mind a lot of them * - and drafts. Of course, among them were smart and recollected, bloody waste to any person not to their heart. Gratitude to them is eternal, they defended their homeland, including from fellow countrymen. Others, bloodstained with blood, before the loss of humanity, left the owners abroad, leaving their relatives behind. Knowing for sure that they will not be responsible for the terrible and bloody deeds of their kin. By the way, we were pleased with the good old days - in what year the corporal punishment of the lower ranks in the tsarist army was abolished? Take an interest.
  19. MrK
    +3
    13 March 2015 19: 08
    A simple explanation of Jarosu81.
    1. Yes, Lenin said: "Let us turn the imperialist war into a civil war." It was assumed that the workers and peasants, having taken power into their own hands, would quickly win everything back. So they won back.

    2. The harsh truth of history is that the young republic simply had no strength or opportunity to fight. First of all, because no one wanted to fight. By the way, according to the memoirs of F. Raskolnikov, it was not the Bolshevik critics who coined the term “obscene”, nor even Lenin was the first to use it: delegates from the front, reaching the rostrum, repeated one thing in their voices: “Give peace, even obscene!”.
    It would be suicide to fight Germany - also a devastated and exhausted war, but in all respects in a much better position. Lenin and his supporters understood this perfectly.
    After fierce discussions and a heated collision of opinions at the Congress of Soviets, the Leninist point of view prevailed, which Trotsky voiced equally cynically (but by no means so simple-heartedly): “We approached the peace talks with the hope of rocking the working masses of both Germany and Austria-Hungary, and Entente countries. To this end, it was necessary to drag out negotiations as long as possible in order to give European workers time to perceive, as follows, the very fact of the Soviet revolution and, in particular, its peace policy. ”
    In other words, there was only a temporary retreat, which the stubborn Bukharinites did not understand. And today they don’t understand Jaros81 with their comrades. They would only shit on the Bolsheviks. All the ideas of democratic snuffles of the 90's have been absorbed. Now defecate.

    3. The book “White Terror in Russia”, published by Patriot Publishing House, is a famous historian, doctor of historical sciences P. A. Golub, clearly shows that there are those responsible for the civil war. The documents and materials collected in it do not leave stone upon stone fiction and myths widely circulating in the mass media and publications on the historical theme, which are given out as uninformed Russian hoaxes as historical truths.
    As shown in the book, it was the White Guards who initiated the Civil War, with the submission of the Left Social Revolutionaries.
    And the impetus for the war, as one of the leaders of the White Movement A. Denikin admitted, was the rebellion of the Czechoslovak corps, which was largely caused and supported by Western "friends" of Russia. Without the help of these “friends”, the leaders of the white Czechoslovakians, and then the White Guard generals, would never have achieved serious success.
    For the tenth time I say: read the book of the young author A. Kurlandchik - “THE CURSED SOVIET AUTHORITY” AND THE RESULTS OF REFORMS IN RUSSIA on Proza.ru. Recommend. There everything shown is reasoned with numbers.
    1. -1
      13 March 2015 21: 03
      And for some reason I read Melgunov.
  20. -1
    13 March 2015 19: 17
    Our history is dashing. Whenever you look, "And the horses are still galloping and galloping ... and the huts are burning and burning ..." Brothers, how many years have passed, but we still can't figure it out between ourselves. I read the comments to the article, it became terrifying, looking at the radicalism of our thinking. Ready to fight. This is probably due to the fact that to this day our history is being redesigned by "technologists" according to the requirements of the "current moment". Great country, great upheavals, long-suffering people, great victories.
    1. +1
      13 March 2015 22: 43
      zubkoff46
      And you propose to reconcile with the descendants of the Krasnodar and Vlasov ???
      Uh, no, they have a place, at best in a landfill, but not in the most respected members of society, to be.
      Especially for those who still consider themselves the heiress of the exploits of this scumbag, dared in a foreign army, for the interests of others, against the Motherland in arms to fight.
  21. -2
    13 March 2015 21: 02
    I am for the Bolsheviks !!!!!!! soldier
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      13 March 2015 21: 43
      For the Jews chtoli?
      1. +2
        13 March 2015 22: 20
        semirek
        Against singing along with the Nazi, whom you are here.
        1. -2
          13 March 2015 22: 38
          What are you?
          1. +1
            13 March 2015 22: 41
            semirek
            Unlike you, singing along to the national flock, a RUSSIAN soldier who has already broken your neck once, we will break this time.
            So your libel, in VO, you can squeeze for a long time tediously and stubbornly, but the TRUTH, you do not.
  22. +3
    13 March 2015 21: 45
    Correct the mistake. This is General Sergey Leonidovich Markov
  23. 0
    13 March 2015 22: 25
    Yes, even for the Jews, but against the Anglo-Saxons, Americans, Germans and French who were served by such "heroes" as Krasnov and others.
  24. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      14 March 2015 10: 36
      sijoi
      What kind of nonsense are the descendants of the Tambov Cossacks?
      If there are certain leaders from the Socialist Revolutionaries and the kulaks?
      To school, talent ... to school and learn lessons. In history, you do not even have a deuce, count.

      In this regard, I want to end with a quote from the immortal M.E. Saltykova-Shchedrina: “He did not know anything about the process of river formation, nor about the laws by which they flow down, not up, but he was convinced that it was only necessary to indicate: from these places to the present - and probably throughout the measured space there will be a mainland, and then, as before, right and left, the river will continue to flow ...
      But since there was no force in nature that could convince a scoundrel of ignorance of anything, in this case ignorance was not only equivalent to knowledge, but even in a certain sense was stronger than it. ”
      1. sijoi
        -1
        14 March 2015 10: 55
        Quote: vladkavkaz
        What kind of nonsense are the descendants of the Tambov Cossacks?
        If there are certain leaders from the Socialist Revolutionaries and the kulaks?


        Learn historical facts, not Soviet propaganda.
        1. +2
          14 March 2015 10: 56
          sijoi
          Young man, before you study science, like termite to Mars. You can sharpen what you sit on, but do something useful, alas, not yours.

          V. And Lenin (Ulyanov):
          1. "The army ... when it did not know what it was fighting for, and vaguely felt that it was fighting for other people's interests, this army fled, and no forces in the world could hold it back."
          2. "Any revolution is only worth something if it knows how to defend itself, but the revolution does not immediately learn to defend itself.
          The revolution was the awakening to a new life of millions. In February and March, these millions did not know why they were going to continue the massacre into which the tsars and Kerenskys drove them, and the purpose of which was exposed only in December by the Bolshevik government. They clearly understood that this was not their war, and it took about six months for a turning point to come. This turning point has come; it changes the strength of the revolution. "


          Joint meeting of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee, the MOSCOW COUNCIL, FACTORY COMMITTEES AND TRADE UNIONS OF 22 OCTOBER 1918)
          http://leninism.su/works/76-tom-37/1372-obedinennoe-zasedanie-vczik-moskovskogo-

          soveta-fabrichno-zavodskix-komitetov-i-professionalnyx-soyuzov.html

          “They will never defeat the people in which workers and peasants for the most part have learned, felt and saw that they are defending their own, Soviet power — the power of the working people, that they are defending a cause whose victory will provide them and their children with the opportunity to enjoy all the benefits of culture, by all creatures of human labor ”,
          http://leninism.su/works/115-conspect/4269-v-i-lenin-ob-inostrannoj-voennoj-inte

          rventsii-i-grazhdanskoj-vojne-v-sssr.html? showall = 1 & limitstart =
          1. sijoi
            0
            14 March 2015 11: 04
            You urgently need a haloperidolchik and sleep.
            1. 0
              14 March 2015 11: 07
              sijoi
              Why are you describing to me the drugs that the doctors will teach you in between your escape from the ward to the ward?
              In the ward, sick, in the ward, you should not participate in such conversations, due to the weakness of your intellect.
              1. sijoi
                -2
                14 March 2015 11: 11
                Do you specifically discredit Soviet ideology with your aggressive and manic behavior?
                1. 0
                  14 March 2015 15: 20
                  sijoi
                  Change the training manual, the troll.
                  Or at least turn the page, too predictable.
  25. +2
    14 March 2015 08: 36
    I read an article that claims to be a historical and journalistic essay. But it reminded me of paid "historical" opuses from the times of the collapse of the USSR, in which a lot of slop was poured on the socialist system and our Soviet past. In this article, the author follows the same beaten path by Svanidze: the Bolsheviks are all alcoholics, criminals, murderers, etc., and the Cossacks are all cherubs. So this article is a bold minus. Now is the time when we must unite, and not pour slop over our past by lowering some below the plinth, and raising others into saints! There was already civil enough, history really does not teach anyone, you cannot promote your personal views and beliefs under the cover of historical works. The story must be impartial.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +5
        14 March 2015 10: 35
        sijoi
        History is impartial-RED in Civil Victory, throwing all the white evil, this is an UNKNOWABLE fact.
        The Reds won the 1945, over the entire European brown rabble, along with a handful of white servants serving them.

        No matter how you try, play and juggle with concepts, but you will not succeed, draw an analogy between the events in UKRAINE, where there is a DIRECT ANALOGY of Germany in the 30 years, with the events of October and the following.

        You also will not succeed in instilling the idea that the Belykh leaders, all these noblemen, merchants, long-maned and others, are something that was of value to the overwhelming majority of the country's population, the CHOICE of the People was not in your favor.

        The socialist system, no matter how much you blame it, is much better, both in terms of the human and in terms of the development of society in general, your liberal dregs in Russia have completely exhausted themselves, showing complete lack of talent.

        And the moaning of all monarchists, and the moaning of the fool Masha, over the broken jug by her own stupidity.
        A sign of SLAVERY is your relationship, the OWNER and the employee, which is now more visible than ever, the payoff from 1,5 to 3 million per day, against the background of the monthly salary of an 10000 employee.
        So who is there something muttering about slavery?

        The minus of my past is that I did not heed the warning of the Great Ruler of the Russian Land, Stalin, with the development of socialism, the class struggle takes place to the escalation, which is what was observed in 90 and we see it absolutely right now.
        And if you think that your liberal bunch, with slogans from the king of peas to the cries of the clicks of the liberal abomination of Chubais, is deceiving someone else in society, you are seriously mistaken, your time is already running out.

        And the last, CHINA, no matter how you mutter here, it has a strictly defined path of development, SOCIALISM, the First is essentially the Power of the world.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. 0
            14 March 2015 15: 19
            sijoi
            You take your doctor’s prescriptions exactly and on time so that you don’t carry any nonsense here in VO.

            A liberal nationalist, that’s how you should be called, and your concerns about us, about the Russian people as a whole and about Russia in general, no one needs.

            All your "concern" in the last 30 years has been in the formula-LIE, LIE and STEAL, so to speak, somewhat modernized the formula of your predecessor and spiritual guru-Goebbels.

            And you do not have to groan forcibly, on the subject - "the human tragedies of the Russian people that occurred in the 20th century." - On your conscience there are immeasurably more of these tragedies, as accomplices of WHITE, accomplices of the NATION, accomplices of the Liberals, losses in people, territories, in everyone, they speak against you and your strained ideology.

            Objectivity says faces and ideology that came to power in the country in 92, is destructive for the country, deadly for the people, the bearers of this ideology are corrupt, vain and empty, always serve Alien interests, and do not try to make excuses, all these Chubais, Kokhi, Yeltsins, Gaidars, Potkins and Co., etc., are the essence of your cannibalistic idea ..
            1. The comment was deleted.
  26. 0
    4 November 2019 20: 32
    The reasons why the Cossacks of all Cossack regions for the most part rejected the destructive ideas of Bolshevism and entered into an open struggle against them, and under completely unequal conditions, are still not completely clear and constitute a mystery to many historians.
    The author does not confuse anything about "Cossacks of all Cossack regions"? And who was the first horse? Who was Budyonny himself? if you really undertake to write on the topic, well, at least you can read Denikin and Krasnov. they wrote a lot about the "rejection of the ideas of Bolshevism" by the Cossacks))) Sheer nonsense. Well, and separately about the "destructive ideas of Bolshevism." The author, probably, dreams of a 1-hour working day, church education, hunger due to lack of land and other delights? Or is the author from the Counts and sincerely believes that this is not all for his lordship? And here I am from the plow and appreciate the improvement of working conditions and educational program, and industrialization, and even collectivization (because you can't plow much on a piece of plow), and other "destructive ideas."