Kazakhstan establishes control over Baikonur

179
Kazakhstan establishes control over Baikonur


The first and once the largest cosmodrome in the world, which is still in demand by Russia, after the collapse of the Soviet Union turned out to be on the territory of independent Kazakhstan. Then he was rented by the Russian Federation together with the satellite city of the same name (up to 1995 - Leninsk). Under the relevant agreement, Russia annually pays 115 million dollars to Kazakhstan. Approximately 170 million dollars are regularly transferred from year to year to support and develop the infrastructure not only of the cosmodrome, but also of the city of Baikonur. There is a Russian government in the city itself, there is even our police. The lease term of the world-famous cosmodrome ends in 2050 year.

But, obviously, the rental contract clauses are not a decree for law enforcement agencies of Kazakhstan, which suddenly began to demand migration cards from Russian citizens living and working in the territory of the city of Baikonur. Departure from the city, which, according to an intergovernmental agreement, is under the jurisdiction of our state, is now fraught with the need for the Russians to provide these same cards to employees of Kazakhstan law enforcement agencies. In the absence of this document from our fellow citizens are collecting fines. At the moment, units had to pay them, but citizens are extremely concerned about the difficulties that have arisen. Especially considering the fact that even the migration service itself in Kazakhstan turned out to be completely unprepared for such a drastic innovation. There were no elementary forms in the required quantity.

As you know, earlier migration cards for citizens of Russia living in Baikonur did not need to fill out. A passport with a residence permit in the city of Baikonur was the only necessary document when crossing the border between Russia and Kazakhstan. In some cases, customs officers allowed the border to cross and upon presentation of a business ID. The reasons for the change in the order that had been in effect for many years are unknown. It is reported only that the leadership of the cosmodrome is considering the use of necessary measures to resolve the looming international conflict.

It seems that in Astana there are quite a few who want to let Russia not survive from the city and from the Baikonur cosmodrome, then at least significantly complicate the current conditions of its lease. This question was even put to consideration in the Kazakh parliament a few months ago. Then, during his speech, deputy Amangeldy Momyshev said that it was necessary to raise the price for the spaceport rental about 10. In particular, the following remarks were made in his address to the deputies: “Why don’t they turn to the president, why don’t they turn to the government? Ask, explain that today the price has increased ... If you compare with those years, in 5, the price has increased in 10 times. Considering this, today the minimum should be a billion! ”

Meyrbek Moldabekov, deputy chairman of the National Space Agency of Kazakhstan, then cooled the ardor of the deputy somewhat. He told parliamentarians that the expenses of the Russian Federation are not limited to annual renting in 115 million dollars. According to Moldabekov, “Russia, in addition to the rental amount, spends about 100 million dollars annually on the technical maintenance of Baikonur facilities and another approximately 100 million dollars on supporting the launch site, as a result, the amount that Russia annually invests in the cosmodrome is about 315 million dollars” . Moreover, according to Moldabekov, these expenses already seem excessive to the Kremlin, for this reason it was decided to build a new cosmodrome in the Far Eastern region. Years after 10, after putting it into operation, Russia may well refuse to rent Baikonur ahead of schedule, the deputy chairman of the National Space Agency warned its deputies.

But this is not all. According to information received in the Kazakh media, some very influential politicians in Astana today seem unfair to the existing procedure for the distribution of income derived from the commercial operation of the site of the Baikonur cosmodrome. Today they are considering the issue of changing it in such a way that a part of the Kazakh side grows and even very significantly. So, for example, in 2009, from the Russian cosmodrome, 19 commercial launches were planned and implemented, of which 12 is the Proton launch vehicle. “Each of its launch brings income of at least 85 million dollars. If you add up the amounts received in 2009 only from the launches of the Proton launch vehicle, it exceeds 1 a billion dollars. ” According to estimates of Meirbek Moldabekov, in five years the landlord represented by Kazakhstan received a little more than 0,5 a billion dollars, whereas the tenant represented by the Russian Federation annually earns more than 1 a billion dollars. There is something to think about, they say in Astana. So the sudden demand for the introduction of special migration cards for Russian residents of Baikonur may be only the first stage of far-reaching future changes.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    179 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      23 September 2011 08: 53
      Unfortunately, the family has a black sheep. This primarily refers to citizen Momyshev. Mister language does not turn to call. Behaves like a retired DPSnik who knows only two arithmetic operations. Able to take and share.

      The situation with the fact that Kazakhstan earns less on a plot of land as a lessor than Russia, which is actually engaged in production on this plot (I exaggerate) is quite normal.
      I want more money ... The desire is understandable, in principle. But a simple "Give" may well be followed by an equally weighty "Let's go ...". And in this respect, Mr. Moldabekov is right.

      In general, the situation is strange with these cards. I'll try to clarify it. My relative works in the migration service of Kazakhstan, wrote him a letter, on the weekend, I think, he will clarify something.
      1. His
        -4
        23 September 2011 16: 14
        Greyhound however
        1. Ivan35
          0
          23 September 2011 21: 07
          Quote: According to information received by the Kazakh media, it seems to some very influential politicians in Astana today ...

          You know - if it seems you cross yourself. Reread the article and think with your head - one deputy (such in Russia and Kazakhstan can still be found) farted - deleted - .. y

          The deputy before the space agency cooled him soundly and reasonably

          Kazakhstan has not issued any additional invoices - so far, some speculation and "information" The article provokes us to discord! Do we need it? In the end, both the Russian and Kazakh oligarchs and the authorities will agree - why should we divide?
      2. Ivan35
        -1
        23 September 2011 21: 10
        As for the freak, I agree - this Momyshev or a fool or an enemy
        But Meyrbek Moldabekov well done - the right position
      3. Ivan35
        0
        23 September 2011 21: 18
        As for the freak, I agree - this Momyshev or a fool or an enemy
        But Meyrbek Moldabekov well done - the right position
      4. Marat
        0
        23 September 2011 22: 45
        I agree banshee! The family has its black sheep - and we have such types of Momyshev. Such monetary issues are very delicate - you cannot transfer them to the political plane - and speak from the deputy rostrum.

        In fact, everything will be decided "behind the scenes" and I am sure - they will agree - as always

        You should not attach excessive importance and "politicize" this information - this is just a statement by one provocateur and some kind of fuss of local authorities - perhaps they want to bargain for little things - for the sake of their pockets and small departmental interests they are ready to put a spoke in the wheel of strategic cooperation

        Personally, as a Kazakh I was upset by this information and the fact that it is disseminated and replicated on this site - even if our authorities themselves agree on both sides
      5. Marat
        0
        23 September 2011 23: 01
        I agree banshee! The family has its black sheep - and we have such types of Momyshev. Such monetary issues are very delicate - you cannot transfer them to the political plane - and speak from the deputy rostrum.

        In fact, everything will be decided "behind the scenes" and I am sure - they will agree - as always

        You should not attach excessive importance and "politicize" this information - this is just a statement by one provocateur and some kind of fuss of local authorities - perhaps they want to bargain for little things - for the sake of their pockets and small departmental interests they are ready to put a spoke in the wheel of strategic cooperation

        Personally, as a Kazakh I was upset by this information and the fact that it is disseminated and replicated on this site - even if our authorities themselves agree on both sides
    2. mitrich
      -1
      23 September 2011 09: 02
      I have a question for users:
      Is there a planet on Earth, and in particular the vastness of the CIS, places for which Russia pays nothing to rent but the cost of maintaining the facility?
      1. -3
        23 September 2011 11: 12
        102-i Base in Gyumri.
        1. oper66
          -2
          26 September 2011 01: 26
          and you know how they fire at her at night my son served there dmb 1 07 2011
    3. ytqnhfk
      +1
      23 September 2011 09: 13
      It's good that you can check! But I think this is true and done with a long-range scope, we have signed an agreement with amers on sending "astronauts" into space, a breakdown, I think it will be a big problem, and they try to play it! It's just that the time is very favorable for all reasons! Well, I will wait for an answer from your relative (i.e. follow the comments)!
    4. Uncle Sam
      +1
      23 September 2011 09: 46
      Most likely there is no politics here, it seems to me that the Kazakhs just stupidly want to grab a bigger piece without investing anything, because they understand that when Russia has its own spaceport, the shop will either completely disappear or the conditions will completely change.
      1. Sanzyro
        -2
        23 September 2011 11: 05
        Russia has no cosmodrome like Baikonur! All the rest can be considered as auxiliary! The spaceport is not only a launch pad, but also a very extensive infrastructure, which is well developed there. Orbita station in general in a single copy. And the construction of the second such, while no one bothered! So it’s not so simple as it seems, otherwise Russia wouldn’t get such grandmothers into all this, but would calmly use Kap-Yarovsky or the Far East. And do not forget about the geographical features of the location of Baikonur.
        1. +1
          23 September 2011 13: 07
          To the question about - "Such Babki", if we compare the cost of transfers and the salaries of football players for 2011. only one club "Anji", the lease amount of $ 115 million will look ridiculous in the eyes of the Kazakh side, and the remaining $ 200 million is spent on current operation and does not bring profit to the budget.
          1. Sanzyro
            -2
            23 September 2011 14: 29
            The real amount, of course, is more, but who will voice it ?! feel
          2. Sanzyro
            0
            23 September 2011 14: 37
            The real amount, of course, is more, but who will voice it ?! feel
        2. Uncle Sam
          -5
          23 September 2011 20: 59
          Well, the situation in the new cosmos is not worse, but you need to invest the loot in your own, just the infrastructure of the dalvostok will pull up, and jobs again.
          1. Sanzyro
            -2
            23 September 2011 21: 59
            Can you imagine such a project in erefia? So far, nothing like this has happened ...
    5. 916-th
      0
      23 September 2011 09: 55
      I recognize the native law enforcement agencies, found another feeding trough. Although this is a little like a local initiative.
    6. Sanzyro
      +3
      23 September 2011 10: 18
      This is nothing new. It was already in the dashing nineties ... They will solve this problem, another one will emerge, again resting on the grandmother. Everyone wants to eat, but at someone else's expense - with a doubled appetite! But only now, in the near future, Russia is unlikely to give up this cosmodrome. And the Kazakhs understand this very well. This is an example of the very occupation, when "breaking in", the invaders left behind hospitals, schools, cosmodromes, cities, and in general they practically built statehood as such! And now they demand money from the invaders. What is received for free, as a rule, corrupts and inspires false hopes. The Russians will leave - there will be a steppe, as it was before them. The most remote corner of Kyzyl is Kuma, camels, yurts, sand ... And there will be no one to demand bakshish from!
    7. Styx
      -2
      23 September 2011 11: 42
      Another failed state wants to profit at the expense of Russia
    8. +4
      23 September 2011 12: 26
      The question is, did the Kazakhs themselves even invest a penny in Baikonur? in its infrastructure, in its development, modernization ... or can it just parasitize on it ???
      1. LESHA pancake
        -2
        23 September 2011 13: 31
        THESE ARE THE COW AND THEY ARE GIVING IT. TIME TO CHANGE THE STALL.
        1. Sanzyro
          0
          23 September 2011 14: 44
          On the question of their cow ... If the Americans on anyone’s territory would shave off this: 1) They would NEVER, NEVER leave! 2) Local, when the hell would pay for it!
          1. LESHA pancake
            -1
            23 September 2011 14: 47
            WELL MEANS WHO DOES NOT AGREE THAT TERRORIST No. 1.
        2. oper66
          -3
          25 September 2011 00: 52
          COW THAT OUR WE HAVE BORN HER ITS HERE AND NOW THEY WANT THEM ALSO FOR THE TITS TO BE SUPPORTED
          1. oper66
            -1
            26 September 2011 01: 45
            minus those who dream about a boobs PIPPERS DON'T STEAD MORE MINUSES MORE I AM SURE I HAVE YOURSELF LIKE YOU IN A COW 4 SUGGES AND I MUST SUGGEST YOU TO SLEEP FROM A RUSSIAN COUNTRY TO RAISE NOT CLAY AND PAPER KHORAN IS NOT WRITTEN WRITTEN AND WE ARE SOLDIERS IN SAMORKAND IN A TOILET IN PUBLIC CLAY PIECES SPREAD OF A GLASSED WERE WAS JELLY HOLLAHALLAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
            1. oper66
              -2
              26 September 2011 02: 25
              WHAT ARE DOMESTIC PAPERS OR LADDER AND AT ALL YOU CUT OFF THE MAGOMETS THROUGHOUT YOU WASHING WRITTEN THAT THE WRITTEN WRITTEN WAS NOT WASHED SO YOU TANED OR NOT WASHED
            2. ereke
              -2
              26 September 2011 04: 45
              In fact, soap, a sauna and an oriental bathhouse as well as gunpowder, paper and a compass, and public toilets in the west and in Russia, in particular, came from the east in the Middle Ages. when Arabs, Chinese and other eastern countries were developed than wild Harman and Slavic tribes. then Europe overtook in technical development. ASIA’s century is returning. 21st century is the age of ASIA. More and more Asian countries are turning into economic and now into political tigers. SO WHAT YOUR TIME HAS PASSED, AS THE Bolsheviks said. IT IS VISIBLE AS YOU ARE IN YOUR ENERGY, DROP TO A HYSTERIC SPEECH. SOON IN THE SAME RUSSIA, IT'S GOING TO EAT IF IF YOU WERE SO WRITTEN)) YOUR PLEASANT APPETIT, OPERATED PURPOSE TO SHARE ON THE OWNERS. and minus someone earlier from your beginnings, then we started like that just in case, like we can)) And Russia is hard to kneel down but easy to bend with cancer. By themselves, the Russian people are worthless without the support of other peoples, both Slavic and Turkic and Caucasian. they lost the Japanese war of 1904-05 when they themselves purely decided to conduct the news with their own Russians and the Crimean company 1854-55 also lost when they decided to get along with the Chechen one too))
            3. ereke
              -2
              26 September 2011 04: 54
              In fact, soap, a sauna and an oriental bath, as well as gunpowder, paper and a compass, and public toilets, were stored in Russia, including from the east in the Middle Ages. when Arabs, Chinese and other eastern countries were developed than wild Harman and Slavic tribes. then Europe overtook in technical development. ASIA’s century is returning. 21st century is the age of ASIA. More and more Asian countries are turning into economic and now into political tigers. SO WHAT YOUR TIME HAS PASSED, AS THE Bolsheviks said. IT IS VISIBLE AS YOU ARE IN YOUR ENERGY, DROP TO A HYSTERIC SPEECH. SOON IN THE SAME RUSSIA, IT'S GOING TO EAT IF IF YOU WERE SO WRITTEN)) YOUR PLEASANT APPETIT, OPERATED PURPOSE TO SHARE ON THE OWNERS. and minus someone earlier from your beginnings, then we started, just in case, like we can, too)) And Russia is hard to kneel down but easy to bend with cancer. By themselves, the Russian people are worthless without the support of other peoples, both Slavic and Turkic and Caucasian. they lost the Japanese war of 1904-05 when they themselves purely decided to conduct the news with their own Russians and the Crimean company 1854-55 also lost when they decided to get along with the Chechen one too))
      2. Sanzyro
        0
        23 September 2011 14: 38
        What a penny ?? What are you speaking about?? The spaceport began to be built in the 55th year! What could they invest? Camel litter ?? There existed a tiny train junction of Thur - There (guess who built the railway) and that’s it! Steppe and nothing more. And from this nothing in a few years a modern, beautiful, green city has grown! Well, actually the spaceport and the entire infrastructure to it!
        1. LESHA pancake
          0
          23 September 2011 14: 39
          KAZAKH COMES AT ALL READY.
          1. +2
            23 September 2011 14: 52
            then a natural question! WHY DO WE NEED TO PAY FOR WHAT WE BUILT BY YOURSELF ???? or can invoice the Kazakhs for all the infrastructure built? not only in Baikonur but throughout Kazakhstan !!!
            1. LESHA pancake
              -1
              23 September 2011 14: 56
              BECAUSE WE PERFORMED THE INTERNATIONAL DUTY OF HA HA.
              1. +2
                23 September 2011 15: 02
                Oh yeah ... sorry, I forgot .... we always help everyone ... helped ... and now only the lazy one will not yell at Russia what they say is the Soviet occupation, etc. ... and is trying to grab some more money ... and ours the pro-Western spineless government is kicking and counting ...
                1. LESHA pancake
                  -1
                  23 September 2011 15: 07
                  A SAME FRIENDSHIP?
                  1. +1
                    23 September 2011 15: 16
                    yeah ... friendship .... let's say you take a friend from your friend, well, let's say a bike ride .... does he bill for that ??? what is interesting for such a friendship ???
                  2. 0
                    23 September 2011 15: 17
                    yeah ... friendship .... let's say you take a friend from your friend, well, let's say a bike ride .... does he bill for that ??? what is interesting for such a friendship ???
                  3. 0
                    23 September 2011 15: 17
                    yeah ... friendship .... let's say you take a friend from your friend, well, let's say a bike ride .... does he bill for that ??? what is interesting for such a friendship ???
            2. Sanzyro
              0
              23 September 2011 15: 06
              Good question! Tell me at least one of these dwarf states that arose in the post-Soviet expanses, which we should not! There are no such ... Strange, some kind of invaders ...
              1. 0
                23 September 2011 15: 19
                and don’t say ... some kind of strange occupants ... wrong ... they came ... they all rebuilt .. and they still had to stay for it ....
              2. +1
                23 September 2011 15: 26
                Quote: Asmoday
                WHY DO WE HAVE TO PAY FOR THAT WE HAVE BUILT ???? or can bill the Kazakhs for the entire infrastructure? not only at Baikonur, but throughout Kazakhstan !!!


                Then Kazakhstan will come p..ts.
                We pay in general, purely for the land occupied. Therefore, once the land of Kazakhstan can not itself grow another start - nafig from the beach. This is how it will grow - without questions, it will be necessary to pay extra money unequivocally.

                And 115 cartoons ... Well, yes, probably a little (in comparison with “Anji”, here Fomas faked well). As agreed, you know ... the market, b% I ... Someone wins, someone loses. What would be there without a cosmodrome? Camels would be grazed in the steppe.
                And then two cities were built, and everything else.

                On the other hand, we have a Pindos contract into space to launch ... Now, if that, let them pay extra. We have the type of force majeure - Kazakhstan stood up. Throw money, otherwise your astronauts at Cape Canaveral will gnaw seven-o'clock birds looking wistfully at the last shuttle.
                Then in Kazakhstan, delegations from the United States meet ... And we would have neighing aside.
                The arrows must be timely and competently translated. Not like C-300 for Iran.
                1. Dovmont
                  0
                  23 September 2011 17: 06
                  Ours did the same with Ukraine when they stopped transporting gas through the Ukrinsky gas pipeline in very cold weather. A freezing Europe suddenly attacked the Kivan racketeers and enlightened them.
            3. Tyumen
              -3
              23 September 2011 19: 00
              What about the other 13 republics?
      3. Sanzyro
        0
        23 September 2011 14: 43
        What a penny ?? What are you speaking about?? The spaceport began to be built in the 55th year! What could they invest? Camel litter ?? There existed a tiny train junction of Thur - There (guess who built the railway) and that’s it! Steppe and nothing more. And from this nothing in a few years a modern, beautiful, green city has grown! Well, actually the spaceport and the entire infrastructure to it!
      4. ytqnhfk
        -1
        23 September 2011 15: 17
        Do they need it? they are up to space like a wolf, straw and a lot of noise and you can’t eat! They are a Baikonur only as a feeding trough, we will leave from there and someone will appear there (the Chinese are amers, well, etc.!)
        1. ereke
          -1
          26 September 2011 05: 02
          And what do you think for us, and why do you think that we only need for this for the feeder, that only you are so smart? If smart why then you consider it as a boykonur feeder. THIS FACT IS THIS CONFIRMATION THAT FOR 30 YEARS THE PROGRESS MEDIA ROCKET THAT WAS NOT FALLING UNDER THE ADVICE FALLED A LONG LONG TIME DISAPPEAR IN THE ATMOSPHERE IN PIECES, THIS MOST RELIABLE CARRIER FALLED !!! EVERYTHING WOULD NOTHING ROCKETS FALL EVERYWHERE, SO THE AMERS FROM NASA PROMISED TO THE ISS TO DELIVER CARGOES AND SPACES, AND THE MONEY TAKED FORWARD. AND THIS IS THE PUNCH OUT, ALL THE MONEY WANTED TO MATURE YOURSELF AT THE EXPENSE OF THE MONOPOLY OF COSMOS BUT THE RUSSIANS WASN'T THAT BRAINS BECAME LITTLE AND THE COMMERCIAL FRAUD LIVING GREAT
        2. ereke
          -1
          26 September 2011 05: 13
          And what do you think for us, and why do you think that we only need for this for the feeder, that only you are so smart? If smart why then you consider it as a boykonur feeder. THIS FACT IS THIS CONFIRMATION THAT No.) YEARS NOT FALLED UNDER ADVICE, THE PROGRESS MEDIA ROCKET FALLED NOT LONG LONGER BACK INTO THE ATMOSPHERE IN PIECES, THIS MOST RELIABLE CARRIER FALLED !!! EVERYTHING WOULD NOTHING ROCKETS FALL EVERYWHERE, SO THE AMERS FROM NASA PROMISED TO THE ISS TO DELIVER CARGOES AND SPACES, AND THE MONEY TAKED FORWARD. AND THIS IS THE PUNCH OUT, ALL THE MONEY WANTED TO WARM THEMSELVES AT THE EXPENSE OF THE MONOPOLY OF SPACE BUT THE RUSSIANS WAS NOT THAT THE BRAINS BROKEN AND THE COMMERCIAL FRAUD LIVING HAS BECAME MORE
      5. zczczc
        -1
        26 September 2011 01: 51
        AsmodeyI’ll say more - if they want to create an alliance with us, then someday the question will arise about the fact of payment.
    9. nnnnnnnnn
      -2
      23 September 2011 15: 28
      In accordance with the lease agreement, the indicated amount is accurate, but according to the terms of the agreement it was still that the Russian side would provide Kazakh with a certain number of SU-27 aircraft, and would modernize the MIG-29 and MIG-31 aircraft, these conditions were not met. the first pair of SU-27 turned out to be with a full spent resource that the Kazakhs refused and the scandal was resolved at the level of Mr. Pu and the National Academy of Sciences, negotiations on modernization, which lasted for three years, came to a standstill and as a result, modernization was carried out in Ukraine and Belarus (if anyone I remember the MIG-29 of the Kazakh Air Force crashed in my opinion in the summer of 2006), further due to the lease of Baikonur, the Sary-Shagan test site, as well as landfills in western Kazakhstan, Russia was supposed to provide air defense systems. All these conditions have not been fulfilled so far.
      1. Ivan35
        -1
        23 September 2011 21: 21
        Good comment nnnnnnnnn! That is, not everything is monotonous and there is perhaps some kind of situation of mutual settlements.

        Only by and large it seems to me that I don’t even have to take into account the little things - to prove who owes what to someone - otherwise we will come to a situation like with Ukraine - sheer calculations of who owes what to whom

        I am sure that the "powers that be" themselves will agree without us

        The purpose of this article is incomprehensible - what? to set up part of the Russian audience against Kazakhstan? And the title is generally a provocation - what control? One deputy farted and that's it

        First, no one has billed - and I am sure they will not - the political course of Astana is unambiguous - to connect with Russia

        Secondly, nobody canceled economic calculations and disputes and this is not a reason for the formation of public opinion
    10. nnnnnnnnn
      -1
      23 September 2011 15: 43
      And gentlemen, if you write comments, then be objective and do not write about the fact that Kazakhstan wants to profit at the expense of someone. In addition to Baikonur, Russia rents as many landfills in Kazakhstan and it is a huge territory. And believe me, everything pays a penny, and now Kazakhstan has always been an ally of Russia, Kazakhstan was the first to sign an agreement with Russia on eternal friendship, etc., etc. What we have nothing What gave the Customs Union everything has risen in price why? because prices are compared with Russian. In accordance with the CSTO treaty, the arms of the country that are members of the CSTO can be bought in Russia at domestic prices for the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, and as a result, it sells to Arabs or Chavez cheaper worldwide than to Belarusians or Kazakhs. And what do you think you need such an ally?
      1. LESHA pancake
        -3
        23 September 2011 15: 53
        ABOUT THE ALLIANCE AN ELSE BIG QUESTION. KAZAKHSTAN UNTIL ANYTHING NOBODY TOUCH BECAUSE RUSSIA UNDER SIDE, WHEN IT WILL HELP. AND THERE WILL KAZAKH HELP US?
        1. ereke
          -1
          24 September 2011 14: 16
          I always hear it. Like "no one touches Kazakhstan yet because Russia is close by," one wrote to me on another site, "together we are strong, and they will devour one by one." France, and even earlier, in the late 90s and 2000s, we conducted joint exercises on our soil, just like now, like the CSTO. on our side were two airborne brigades, with their rapid reaction forces of the United States and France. They also hinted that if we were to defend us and our land, it was clear from whom from the Northern and Eastern Neighbors between these regional powers we were. The question arises, why should we constantly impose our competitors and enemies and make them our enemies? Can someone from the Russians answer this question?
          1. LESHA pancake
            -3
            24 September 2011 14: 20
            THIS IS A FAMILY QUESTION. DO YOU RESPECT ME?
          2. LESHA pancake
            -2
            24 September 2011 14: 23
            THIS IS A FAMILY QUESTION. DO YOU RESPECT ME?
        2. ereke
          0
          24 September 2011 14: 36
          I always hear it. Like "no one touches Kazakhstan yet because Russia is close by," one wrote to me on another site, "together we are strong, and they will devour one by one." France, and even earlier, in the late 90s and 2000s, we conducted joint exercises on our soil, just like now, like the CSTO. on our side were two airborne brigades, with their rapid reaction forces of the United States and France. They also hinted that if we were to defend us and our land, it was clear from whom from the Northern and Eastern Neighbors between these regional powers we were. The question arises, why should we constantly impose our competitors and enemies and make them our enemies? Can someone from the Russians answer this question?
        3. ereke
          -1
          24 September 2011 14: 37
          I always hear it. Like "no one touches Kazakhstan yet because Russia is close by," one wrote to me on another site, "together we are strong, and they will devour one by one." France, and even earlier, in the late 90s and 2000s, we conducted joint exercises on our soil, just like now, like the CSTO. on our side were two airborne brigades, with their rapid reaction forces of the United States and France. They also hinted that if we were to defend us and our land, it was clear from whom from the Northern and Eastern Neighbors between these regional powers we were. The question arises, why should we constantly impose our competitors and enemies and make them our enemies? Can someone from the Russians answer this question?
        4. ereke
          -1
          24 September 2011 14: 40
          I always hear it. Like "no one touches Kazakhstan yet because Russia is close by," one wrote to me on another site, "together we are strong, and they will devour one by one." France, and even earlier, in the late 90s and 2000s, we conducted joint exercises on our soil, just like now, like the CSTO. on our side were two airborne brigades, with their rapid reaction forces of the United States and France. They also hinted that if we were to defend us and our land, it was clear from whom from the Northern and Eastern Neighbors between these regional powers we were. The question arises, why should we constantly impose our competitors and enemies and make them our enemies? Can someone from the Russians answer this question?
        5. ereke
          -2
          24 September 2011 14: 41
          I always hear it. Like "no one touches Kazakhstan yet because Russia is close by," one wrote to me on another site, "together we are strong, and they will devour one by one." France, and even earlier, in the late 90s and 2000s, we conducted joint exercises on our soil, just like now, like the CSTO. on our side were two airborne brigades, with their rapid reaction forces of the United States and France. They also hinted that if we were to defend us and our land, it was clear from whom from the Northern and Eastern Neighbors between these regional powers we were. The question arises, why should we constantly impose our competitors and enemies and make them our enemies? Can someone from the Russians answer this question?
        6. ereke
          0
          24 September 2011 14: 47
          I always hear it. Like "no one touches Kazakhstan yet because Russia is close by," one wrote to me on another site, "together we are strong, and they will devour one by one." France, and even earlier, in the late 90s and 2000s, we conducted joint exercises on our soil, just like now, like the CSTO. on our side were two airborne brigades, with their rapid reaction forces of the United States and France. They also hinted that if we were to defend us and our land, it was clear from whom from the Northern and Eastern Neighbors between these regional powers we were. The question arises, why should we constantly impose our competitors and enemies and make them our enemies? Can someone from the Russians answer this question?
          1. ereke
            -2
            24 September 2011 14: 56
            Something one kamment came out several times !? damn))
        7. ereke
          -2
          24 September 2011 15: 08
          Kazakhs have always helped Russia, read more about history in the second World War from Kazakhstan, 1 million was mobilized. 200 thousand people, with the then population of 7 million, this is almost the entire able-bodied population of the country. 600 thousand people did not return, half. gone to the front. And how all the Russians knew how to fight. But it seems that the memory of modern Russians is short, I recall from eight twice the heroes of that war, four were Kazakhstani, such as pilot Talgat Begeldinov and Almaty citizen Sergey Lugansky, also a pilot, but everyone knows about the Ponfilof division formed in Alma-Ata even in far abroad . So at the critical moment for Russia, the divisions and brigades created in Kazakhstan at the beginning of the war did their job.
          1. ereke
            -1
            24 September 2011 15: 20
            In the 90s, when the Feds got stuck in Chechnya. Large-caliber machine guns "Utes" for the federal troops in dire need of this type of weapon also came from Kazakhstan. It turned out that the most effective weapon on armored personnel carriers and tanks in urban battles is precisely a large-caliber machine gun that can fire at high-rise buildings and militants sitting in them, as well as conduct aimed fire at manpower. Uralmash in Uralsk has increased the production of these machine guns. But the war ended in 1997. and the RF refused to continue to fulfill its obligations under the contract. So they lay in the warehouses, Until V. Putin started the second Chechen company, then Russia completely bought all the machine guns made without further ado, its recently created KORD was still unfired enough and the production of this KORD was in small-scale production.
        8. nnnnnnnnn
          +2
          24 September 2011 20: 13
          I answer and who touched Russia? Chechnya, as I was told by one competent comrade from the Kazakh special services (Russian by the way), they sent to the FSB of Russia a list of Nokhchi who came to Kazakhstan to be cured after the work of the righteous, what do you think was the answer? do not touch them correctly, they are correct Nokhchi, though in the second Chechen one these guys became wrong and now they are probably in paradise with lovely guris. And here is Tajikistan. In the 90s, a convoy of the Kazakhstan peacekeeping battalion was ambushed, lost 13 people; help came very late; the allies did not have diesel fuel and jet fuel, and who was the ally? Just sort out your country, and then think about others.
          1. ereke
            -2
            24 September 2011 20: 58
            I also know very well about the incident in Tajikistan, the Russian units were not far away, they arrived only when the exchange of fire was asleep. Otazyvatsya supposedly diesel fuel nebylo kerosene on the turntables, when asked we were guided artillery also otmazatsya like shtirlits in one joke. There were indeed a lot of killed Kazakhstanis and wounded too, the spirits ambushed well and professionally, each section of the route was fired
      2. Sanzyro
        -2
        23 September 2011 19: 37
        That's the territory ... The steppe ... In which the cities grew up, with hot water, water closets and steam heating! As well as schools, hospitals, jobs for local people, etc. Can we take it away, take it ?? Interestingly, the US considers Hawaii as an equal subject and pays them for raising them to civilization and using their land ??
      3. Marat
        -1
        23 September 2011 23: 14
        You are right nnnnnnnnn, you shouldn't blame the whole republic for trying to "profit" from one or more "figures"

        In general, it seems to me that it is wrong to start counting and dividing “within the family” loudly “for the whole world” - let our politicians calmly figure it out and agree

        In general, the economies of both Kazakhstan and Russia allow integration without "mutual overeating" - no one will feed or eat anyone
        1. Sanzyro
          -3
          24 September 2011 00: 18
          They figured out - the Union didn’t ... Do Kazakhs benefit from this ?? And let's take a honest look at history; without Russia, Kazakhstan would not have had an economy. You say inside the family, yes, something quickly Kazakhstan separated from us ... They don’t count money inside the family, but when you divorce, do you know how property is shared ?? Wow!
          1. Marat
            +2
            24 September 2011 00: 40
            As for the collapse of the Union and the loss, I completely agree - nothing good.
            The current "prosperity" due to oil super profits - the collapse of the Union itself did not bring happiness to ordinary Kazakhs

            As for the economy and history, Sanzyro also agrees, almost the entire modern infrastructure was built under the USSR

            About - "quickly separated" - no, I disagree. Kazakhstan remained the last and only republic of the USSR that did not leave the Union - google or read - that's for sure. We are not Balts and not Georgians - neither the people nor Nazarbayev sought to separate - and now our leadership not only supports integration, but in fact the initiator and leader in this matter in comparison with Belarus and Russia

            All the same, a complete divorce did not work out - a too large common border - actually open - a too long common history - and our economies are inextricably linked (starting from KTZ - Russian Railways and ending with the energy system.
            In recent years, as you know, integration is gaining momentum - both the TC and the SES are planning a common currency - in my opinion, now it's not about divorce, but a new "wedding" -
            1. ytqnhfk
              0
              25 September 2011 02: 34
              Marat agrees with you completely thanks for the truthful comment and a reasonable saying!
            2. Sanzyro
              -1
              25 September 2011 10: 38
              Not everything, of course, is as rosy in the political Olympus as I would like ... I understand your position and most sane people in our countries think the same, but the reality is far from our desires. The ball rules, alas, not sanity! And there are more and more nationalistic slogans in Kazakhstan. This is especially popular among young people. So who is leading the education of the nation in this vein ??
        2. Dovmont
          -2
          24 September 2011 08: 00
          Everything is very good!!! Only now, Kazakh nationalism rushing from all the cracks, the Russian language is in every way uprooted from circulation. Something Kazakhstan is in no hurry to return to Russia the territories donated to it by the Kremlin bzdunami !! and this is the whole industrial east, north and west of Kazakhstan starting from the ore Altai, the entire right bank of the Irtysh, Pavlodar, Akmola, Ural, Guryev regions - these are Cossack all lands of the Ural, Siberian, Semirechinsky Cossack Troops cut off from Russia by liquid-wooled mankurts at one time. And so actually there are no problems with Kazakhstan
          1. ereke
            -2
            24 September 2011 15: 37
            Well then, if so then before the border of the Moscow principality passed to the Don River 12 century. Next were the Kipchaks' nomads known in Russia as Polovtsy and in the West as Cumans. Kipchaks are the basis of the Kazakh people; their language is now the basis of the Kazakh language. So let's turn the land to the Don River and the former capital of Kazakhstan, with the region, Orenburg too ...
            1. oper66
              -2
              24 September 2011 20: 20
              here is something that you have exceeded the respected land to the don, you say, then argue with the Armenian society "Karabakh" in the 90s they turned to the UN with a demand that Russia voluntarily return the lands belonging to great Armenia in 9 BC and also asked the Kuban Don Stavropol and Volga regions. and the fact that the Kazakhs are descendants of the Kasaks who lived in the southern regions of present-day Kazakhstan, you don’t remember and the Cyrillic writing from where you don’t know and Orenburg is the historical capital, and you’re seriously oppressed as a Cossack fortress, the "faithful" fort became the capital of Kazakhstan. let's be honest, before the accession of cities and writing you did not have, and only as part of the Russian Empire and further in the USSR did the Kazakh people develop and become, you write in 1941, the population was 7 mil, and during the time of the USSR, how many times has increased, and now the area of ​​your states after 1945 and the creation of the UN so that the USSR would not be alone in it and could resist the USA and NATO, the size of the states of the union republics of Ukraine and Kazakhstan were artificially increased, Uzbekistan, which at face value, together with the RSFSR Belarus, became members of the United Nations, providing the USSR with the number of votes and nationalism will be enough as it's tired
              1. ereke
                -2
                24 September 2011 20: 44
                This is all that you said to relate to the history of the new during the Tsarist Empire, while the Cossacks, as servants of the tsar, built forts and guarded the borders of the imperial empire, you somehow take one segment of the history and extend it to the whole history of the Kazakh Khanate from the time of independence. In a word, you turn over upside down. Is it your political myopia? or elementary stupidity? or some kind of ideological calculation. At the expense of the Cyrillic alphabet, it was adopted in 1940 when standardization of writing took place (only Georgians and neighbors Armenians allowed their writing to be left) before that, from the mid-20s there was a Latin, before that Kazakhs used Arabic script, before our era the Saki used the runic letter accepted in persian power. Russians called Kyrgyz Kaisaks for their convenience, the Kazakhs of all three zhuzes and all the genera in it, and the Jagaybayl, Jalairov, Kanly, Kipshak, Bozhban, foot cockroaches, etc. Kazakh birth
                1. oper66
                  -3
                  24 September 2011 21: 08
                  name at least one city truth Kazakh only not Astana but the fact that the nomad tribes rode the steppes so this is nonsense I do not try to humiliate the Kazakhs but I say that you became a nation in Russia and Russia gave you statehood and before that the zhuzes lived in a tribal system not even feudalism and signs of tribal heritage can be traced in you and now even in the construction of state administration, unfortunately, clans (families) have come to power in Russia and the mafia is not Russian but Zionist
                  1. ereke
                    -1
                    24 September 2011 21: 22
                    Shymkent, Taraz, Sauran, Otrar, All cities in agricultural oases and on the Silk Road trade route traded between steppe qualities and the Central Asian emirates further Eran and Arab caliphates (where do you think Damascus sabers, carpets and brocade fell to Kazakh nomads) also China (silk and spices). The last two cities of the Nge are functioning, as unnecessary and changing priorities.
                    1. oper66
                      -1
                      24 September 2011 22: 17
                      information about tribes and tribal unions in the territory of modern Kazakhstan belong to 1 thousand BC in ancient Persian sources they were called Saki lived on the territory of the modern seven rivers in the north of Kazakhstan. Sauromat tribes lived on the Caspian coast Caspian tribes in the south-west of the region there were other gos. Sogd. Bactria with the highest culture for that time between 4-3 C.D. appears tribes of the Usni Kangyu and Alans who settled on the territory between Balkhash and Tien Shan and in the foothills of the Karatau Alans settled in the west. steppe of Kazakhstan. Otrar cities and other ancient cities along the Silk Road. Of all the tribes, perhaps the descendants of which are modern Kazakhs can only be Saks. the cities have no relation to the creation of their Saki, but they were created by the Turks and now, thanks to the established administrative borders under the USSR and the creation of the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic, we just ended up on the territory of present Kazakhstan by this type of Russians we can appropriate the right to erect and gorgipii dr the Greek city in the place of which there is a modern Anapa and a number of other ancient Greek cities, therefore, dear, do not blaspheme and do not ascribe other people's works and merits to yourself, but let's live in peace and harmony and you didn’t lose any independence, but about the Latin how could you exist in the Russian Empire when there were even hints you didn’t have an empire before entering. don’t look for something that doesn’t, maybe someone could write in Latin but not all of the population
                      1. ereke
                        -2
                        25 September 2011 06: 56
                        Kazakhs are Turks, all clans (or as you call tribes) that were at different times in interedu alliances, starting from 1 millennium AD, Turgesh Kaganate, Kipchak and Kimak, etc. also the Nogais, who at one time belonged to the Golden Horde, when the horde broke up, the Astrakhan Khanate, the Kazan Khanate, the Nogai Horde and the Ak Horde were created, are now Kazakh clans and no one can challenge this right. With the creation of the Kazakh Khanate and its spread throughout the Turanian steppe as well as to the territory of the Central Asian states with the center of Tashkent (which the Kazakh khans controlled for 200 years), the Horde and Nogai became part of the Kazakh Khanate. And in 1611, a border treaty was concluded between the tsar autocrat Russian and Kazakh khan Tauke, according to which the Nogai horde went to the Kazakh khanate, and tsarist Russia secured the Kazan khanate, the Astrakhan and Siberian khanstas. But the Turks also lived in the cities and they are now in the constituent part of the Kazakhs formed into a single nation (not Russians, after all) only by occupation they were merchants and not nomads, and were engaged in trade, not breeding cattle, and reselling livestock on Wednesday. Asian states. There were another Kazakhs who were also not nomads, and they lived in cities, blacksmiths, they were engaged in the manufacture of horse equipment such as harnesses and saddles, finishing their work with gold and silver as well as weapons, mainly arrowheads and arrow quivers, as well as wood carvings and made dishes.
                        1. ereke
                          -4
                          25 September 2011 07: 14

                          Here it is in Latin, the newspaper "socialist Kazakhstan" for 1937 the first page of the new constitution of the USSR
                        2. ereke
                          -4
                          25 September 2011 07: 20

                          something does not load the picture
                        3. ereke
                          -4
                          25 September 2011 07: 24
                          Some garbage is obtained here with pictures, a continuous advertisement is inserted unclear from where ... You can see it on Wikipedia, the Kazakh writing tags, also Kazakh madrasah schools, like church schools in Russia
                        4. oper66
                          -2
                          25 September 2011 07: 59
                          dear, so it’s not me, but you mix the story like in a mixer, I understand that you want to show the birthright, but you have the cities that you called not the Kazakh tribes the second Golden Horde and Nogai, then you will conquer the Kazakh lands and Yakuia by type of appearance feel here is the Iygur people related to you, and the Nogais and Kalmyks are a slightly different song. the most interesting thing in the search for historical ideification, some people are so distorting history that they themselves begin to believe in it sacredly if you do not believe it, go on the topic of the historical lie of Poland, there one agreed that the Ukrainians won with the Grunwald saved Europe, etc.
                          and indeed we say now, but in the present, there are certain leaders who are eager for power and they drive ideas of independence in your head, but tell me how history may be wrong, that all cities in Kazakhstan have a Russian name
                        5. ereke
                          -2
                          25 September 2011 09: 59
                          Kalmyks were NEVER related to us even though they were nomadic people, they are not Turkic people, they belong to the Khalkha-Mongol group. Here in kammenty I cited the Turkic tribes with a common culture and language. Uyghurs are also not kindred to us, they are farmers and traders from time immemorial, although some Uyghurs live on the territory of Kazakhstan. You somehow superficially threw and mixed everything up, just to get away with all this and mislead. Covering everything your tinsel said with the true meaning of your propaganda. And if so, then the Eastern Slavs also used to live as tribes of the Andes, Rossi, Vyatichi, etc. until they formed into the united peoples of Russians, Belarusians and Ukrainians.
                        6. ereke
                          -1
                          25 September 2011 10: 13
                          Uralsk the name Russian is from the Ural River, the Kazakh name is Oral, Orenburg is remade under the German transcription the real name is Oryn Bor or Orynbar. Pavlodar and Peter and Paul and the Russians, the names of the kings. But also in America there is Memphis (the name of the capital of the ancient Egyptian kingdom) from this memphis has not ceased to be American. Os Kamen (Ust Kamenogorsk) Semey (Semipalatinsk) Kokshetau (in Kokchetav) you can remake the former Kazakh sites and villages indefinitely, you can eventually and vice versa. There were also cities and towns Dzherzhinsk, Sovetskoye, Komsomolsk, Chapaevo, 40 years of October, etc. And so what...
                        7. oper66
                          0
                          25 September 2011 10: 24
                          here he himself answered the former Kazakh camps of the city, which the Russians laid and built, therefore they are at present and Russia would not have been a stable camp until now. he has not yet answered about the formation of statehood and the emergence of a people from a tribe of how many Kazakhs are now and how many were Russia created and formed the modern developed state of kazakhstan, which had never been mentioned before in the history of mankind
                        8. ereke
                          -1
                          25 September 2011 11: 04
                          The Kazakh Khanate as a state entity was formed in the 15th century and its first khans were Zhanibek and Kerey, from the seven-river to the southern regions of modern Kazakhstan. Starting from Burunduk Khan further on to Khaknazar, the Kazakh Khanate expanded within the borders throughout the Turan land to Omsk in the north and to Tashkent in the south, uniting all Turkic-speaking people, regardless of occupation. At this time, the Kazakh khans waged numerous sometimes bloody wars with neighboring environments. Asian emirates as well as with Tashkent beys. As a result, Tashkent fell under the dependence of the Kazakh Khanate. Starting with Khan Tauke, 17th century, the final boundaries of the Kazakh Khanate were determined and the first set of state was fixed. laws (by the type of the constitution) "Zhety Zhargy" Since the 18th century Ablai Khan, the Dzungars began to raid the Kazakh land. After the death of Khan Ablai, centrifugal forces from among the sultans and the bais supporting them increased, by this time the Kazakh Khanate was divided into three zhuzes with clearly marked nomadic camps, each zhuz began to push through its khan. Taking advantage of the internecine strife in the country, the Dzungars intensified their devastating raids. In the face of external danger, the Kazakh khans and sultans had to unite and appoint the young and energetic Abulkhair Khan as the supreme commander. In the Dzungar gorge between the Kazakhs and the Dzungars, a battle took place that ended in defeat for the Dzungars and the death of the Dzungar Khan Ts. Rabtan. Some sultans with their nukers and sarbaz never entered the battle, watching from the side of the battle. After the victory, such sultans left without taking part in the feast in honor of the victory. Yes, and those who participated in the feast quarreled among themselves and did not share the regalia of victory. In the light of the increasing influence of the Khan of the younger zhuz Abulkhair. centrifugal forces united to fight him under the head of Sultan Barak. Sensing this, Abulkhair, saving his power, joined the junior zhuz of neighboring Russia under his control by signing the appropriate documents and a memorandum of eternal friendship. But this did not save him, on the contrary, earlier the sultans who were tolerant of him went over to Barak's side. And one day while hunting with a saber from behind, they cut off his head. Further, Russia turned into an empire with a postponed mechanism of seizure and colonization over the past 100 years, completely colonized the Kazakh lands using the methods of bribery, pitting against each other, sometimes by force, and sometimes by economic levers. And yet the unknown history of Kazakhstan, how can you argue with me, it's stupid, go better read different sources thoroughly ...
                        9. One of many
                          +1
                          25 September 2011 22: 59
                          Orenburg was named after its original location on the river Or. Then it seems like it was "transported" about five times before it found its current location. And in its original place there is the city of Orsk, which is called "zhaman-kala" from the Kazakh side for some reason (the evil-city seems so?). so the ornbar somehow ... I suppose it's inappropriate.
                          I go to Kazakhstan through those places that I saw something, I know something from the words ... if you correct something.
                        10. ereke
                          -1
                          26 September 2011 09: 18
                          The Kazakh meaning is transmitted as you said at the expense of Orenburg, although Modern Orenburg is located to the right if you look from the west towards Siberia, than the Kazakh wintering was located, another meaning "there is a place for a camp" is only abbreviated by the river
                        11. oper66
                          -2
                          25 September 2011 12: 19
                          Well, these tribes had their own cities, writing culture, crafts and agriculture, and did not roam the steppes in the wagons
                        12. oper66
                          -1
                          25 September 2011 12: 25
                          Well, these tribes had their own cities, writing culture, crafts and agriculture, and did not roam the steppes in the wagons
                        13. oper66
                          -1
                          25 September 2011 12: 26
                          Well, these tribes had their own cities, writing culture, crafts and agriculture, and did not roam the steppes in the wagons
                        14. oper66
                          -2
                          25 September 2011 12: 26
                          Well, these tribes had their own cities, writing culture, crafts and agriculture, and did not roam the steppes in the wagons
                        15. ereke
                          -4
                          25 September 2011 12: 59
                          Let's talk about Russia, because Russia used to consist of separate fragmented principalities, from Ryazan in the east, the great free lands of Novgorod in the north and Kiev principality in the south. Strengthening Moscow under Ivan Kalita, which made indecent money through constant bribery of the khans of the Golden Horde, which gave Moscow the right to supreme control of the Russian principalities controlled by the horde and the collection of taxes (yasak) in favor of the Golden Horde. And those who disagree, especially often the disagreeing were the Tver Principality, they were crushed by fire and sword with the help of the Mongol-Tatars sent to help from the horde. And the further strengthening of Moscow under Ivan 3, which was proclaimed king of all Russia, and under Ivan the Terrible, the complete subordination of the specific princes to the elimination of the specific principalities, as well as the elimination of seditious boyars who did not agree with the policies of Ivan the Terrible. The accession of Novgorod lands with the help of the guardsmen who were engaged in robbery and violence on these lands, as well as the destruction of the Novgorod aristocracy and the arson of their homes after plunder. So the rigid centralized power in Russia and the unification around Moscow went by fire and sword, as well as by bribing individual representatives from noble people and the clergy, and this unification into a single Resei state lasted nearly 150 years. And finally it acquired the features of completeness under Peter the Great, in general the process lasted about 1 years, and not only Russians and not only Eastern Slavs took part in this process, who also had their principalities and lands and regalized ... and then the further we talk about the history of Kazakhstan , the farther into the steppe or in the Russian variation of firewood. Turn on the armor (you seem to do it on purpose, or are you really stupid)
                          And in general, the Cyrillic alphabet is not a Russian invention, it was brought from Byzantium, do you know such a state was? and Orthodoxy, too, from there, Vladimir Monomakh planted fire and sword among his pagan Slavs. So their type was not so one-sided here. Then the question will also be an edge, but what then is your god Perun, and what writing and culture besides Byzantine?
                        16. ereke
                          -2
                          25 September 2011 13: 15
                          And Peter the Great understood the advantages of Western civilization and instilled force in the Resei state, European caftans even forced to wear and cut beards to the boyars, and did not execute consonants from among the serving archers and boyars. Wouldn’t Peter be like China at that time. China did not understand the advantages of Western civilization and lived on the past power of the eastern countries, although the potential was huge then. But the clumsy state’s colossus and backward army armed with wick guns lost to the Western fleet and armies and China eventually turned into a half-colony which was plundered by Western Europeans
                        17. oper66
                          -3
                          25 September 2011 20: 07
                          Peter is not great at first and his merits are exaggerated by the Russophobes about the state of the Kazakhs, it is artificially created by the Russians and if it weren’t for the Russians you would eat the sun-dried cabbage like the Mongols, but I don’t just want to understand if you just have a good conscience will allow you to say thanks to the Russian people who brought you out of the red book and made the steward of the people gave you statehood i.e. self-awareness and determination, ask yourself what would happen if you had died from cholera who treated you Russian doctors shame on you
                        18. oper66
                          -2
                          25 September 2011 20: 11
                          Peter is not great for the first time and his merits are exaggerated by the Russophobes; he will saturate the state of the Kazakhs; it is artificially coexisted by the Russians and if it weren’t for the Russians you would eat the dried cabbage like the Mongols, but I don’t just want to understand if you just have a good conscience that will allow thank you to the Russian people who brought you out of the red book and made you governing people gave you statehood i.e. self-awareness and determination, ask yourself what would happen if you had died from cholera who treated you Russian doctors shame on you
                        19. ereke
                          0
                          26 September 2011 05: 24
                          Well, now you are exaggerating)) before the Russian principalities paid tribute to us and tried to get married with our khans, but times have changed Russians have become stronger as an empire, but as history has shown, everything is back to square one, this is a natural process. We have already been the masters of our land, and a huge step always belongs to us, it’s already without question and drop your propaganda here)) It was always easier with us to simply agree with the Tsar Empire, since we are a single whole and all the Turks on this land have united into Kazakhs, and it’s easier to agree with one owner. the only truth is you are constantly cheating. Another thing is the NORTH CAUCASUS there are many peoples, only they figured out with the Chechens and agreed so the Dagi went different, and there the Ingush and everyone should agree and invest money)) Is it bad? when on such a small span of the earth as the Caucasus are many nationalities? and that it doesn’t work for you to unite them? and the art of creating a state there is always there for! were for the Russians?
                        20. oper66
                          -2
                          25 September 2011 23: 06
                          that shdetsiki you deny the Russian people Russian taught you to piss standing
                        21. oper66
                          -1
                          26 September 2011 01: 13
                          that you minus or you didn’t know that the Russians had the script before Cyril and Methodius, imagine that at that time two monks taught you to read and write all Russia, you’re funny, even with today's possibilities, it’s not possible, they just corrected the script and established spelling rules
                        22. zczczc
                          +1
                          26 September 2011 01: 17
                          Only few understand this. Everyone really thinks that Kiryusha and Mefusha taught everyone to read and write ...
                        23. oper66
                          -2
                          26 September 2011 01: 18
                          that you minus or you didn’t know that the Russians had written language before Cyril and Methodius, imagine that at that time two monks taught all Russia to read and write what fun people you are even with today's capabilities it’s not possible they just corrected its writing and established spelling rules
                        24. oper66
                          -2
                          26 September 2011 01: 21
                          that you minus or you didn’t know that the Russians had written language before Cyril and Methodius, imagine that at that time two monks taught all Russia to read and write what fun people you are even with today's capabilities it’s not possible they just corrected its writing and established spelling rules
                        25. oper66
                          -2
                          26 September 2011 01: 22
                          that you minus or you didn’t know that the Russians had written language before Cyril and Methodius, imagine that at that time two monks taught all Russia to read and write what fun people you are even with today's capabilities it’s not possible they just corrected its writing and established spelling rules
                2. oper66
                  -2
                  24 September 2011 21: 34
                  name at least one city truth Kazakh only not Astana but the fact that the nomad tribes rode the steppes so this is nonsense I do not try to humiliate the Kazakhs but I say that you became a nation in Russia and Russia gave you statehood and before that the zhuzes lived in a tribal system not even feudalism and signs of tribal heritage can be traced even in the construction of state administration, and unfortunately, clans (families) came to power in Russia and the mafia is not Russian but Zionist oper66,
            2. oper66
              -2
              24 September 2011 20: 26
              here is something that you took care of the respected land until you say, then argue with the Armenian society "Karabakh" in the 90s they turned to the United Nations with a demand to Russia to voluntarily return the lands that lay in great Armenia in 9 BC and also asked Kuban Don Stavropol and the Volga region. but the fact that the Kazakhs are descendants of the Kasaks who lived in the southern regions of present-day Kazakhstan do not remember and the writing in Cyrillic from where you don’t know and Orenburg is a historical capital and you seriously oppress as a Cossack fortress "faithful" became the capital of Kazokhstan. let's be honest, before the accession of cities and writing you did not have, and only as part of the Russian Empire and further in the USSR did the Kazakh people develop and become, you write in 1941, the population was 7 mil, and during the time of the USSR, how many times has increased, and now your area states after 1945 and the creation of the united nations so that the ussr would not be alone and could resist the usa and nato, the size of the states of the union republics of ukraine and kazokhstan were artificially increased, which at par, together with the rsfsr were included in the un
              1. oper66
                -3
                25 September 2011 23: 22
                I’m not able to engage in dialogue, but I learned to press minus and I see even a positive result here because, according to psychiatric research, the peoples of the Mongoloid race cannot think in an abstract manner = therefore your individuals could not bring a single breakthrough or simple race sentence to world society narrow-film hokaido didn’t take offense the same and no better than you sometimes remember chizarre lombroso with his biological theory for the development of peoples and personalities and he was right although his theory was hacked as inhuman and it was confirmed by 98%
              2. oper66
                -2
                25 September 2011 23: 27
                I’m not able to engage in dialogue, but I learned to press minus and I see even a positive result here because, according to psychiatric research, the peoples of the Mongoloid race cannot think in an abstract manner = therefore your individuals could not bring a single breakthrough or simple race sentence to world society narrow-film hokaido didn’t take offense the same and no better than you sometimes remember chizarre lombroso with his biological theory for the development of peoples and personalities and he was right although his theory was hacked as inhuman and it was confirmed by 98%
            3. Sanzyro
              -2
              25 September 2011 15: 36
              Do not distort, dear! They say quite fresh to you for events, but you remembered the 12th century! So what about the lands donated to Kazakhstan by the Kremlin, huh ?? You never answered!
              1. ereke
                -3
                25 September 2011 15: 47
                Are you at least Russian? or so in the service of the owners? it so happens that the servants are zealously trying for the gentlemen to earn their bread. But what about Orynbor (Orenburg), the former capital of Kazakhstan and the Orenburg region, that after another demarcation of borders under the Bolsheviks, for some reason, Russia left Russia at the end of the 20s? When will we return?
              2. ereke
                -4
                25 September 2011 15: 54
                Are you at least Russian? or so in the service of the owners? it so happens that the servants are zealously trying for the gentlemen to earn their bread. But what about Orynbor (Orenburg), the former capital of Kazakhstan and the Orenburg region, that after another demarcation of borders under the Bolsheviks, for some reason, Russia left Russia at the end of the 20s? When will we return?
                1. Sanzyro
                  -1
                  25 September 2011 21: 05
                  In short, there is no answer! All clear! About anything just to not give an answer to a specific question - ordinary trolling!
                  1. ereke
                    -1
                    26 September 2011 05: 37
                    This with you was even earlier understood by the provocateur! I demand if you ask so WHAT WITH OUR LANDS WHEN YOU WILL RETURN THEM !!! FROM DON TO ORINBOR INCLUDED !!! AND WHO OUR LANDS RESERVED US BACK TO US BACK ONLY! A CLEAR RESPONSE CAN YOU GET? THESE ARE NOT THESE LACE AND SET OF WORDS OF DIFFERENT TERMS OF FULL PROPAGANDA AND INEQUATE FOR Dumb AND NATIONALISTIC TUNED RUSSIAN
                    1. oper66
                      -3
                      26 September 2011 16: 36
                      in the ass you haven’t round, we’ll also take our residents from the primitive communal standing suckers
                    2. oper66
                      -2
                      26 September 2011 16: 57
                      in the ass you haven’t round, we’ll also take our residents from the primitive communal standing suckers
                      1. ereke
                        -4
                        26 September 2011 20: 05
                        Well, you are scum whitewashed and unroasted. In general, it’s necessary to close all your bases here! nothing to hell with ceremony. Who only think about their own benefit and ignore us. If the war begins, I will go first in the front ranks of such scum as you extinguish and cut without pity for all your words
                  2. ereke
                    -4
                    26 September 2011 05: 40
                    This with you was even earlier understood by the provocateur! I demand if you ask so WHAT WITH OUR LANDS WHEN YOU WILL RETURN THEM !!! FROM DON TO ORINBOR INCLUDED !!! AND WHO OUR LANDS RESERVED US BACK TO US BACK ONLY! A CLEAR RESPONSE CAN YOU GET? THESE ARE NOT THESE LACE AND SET OF WORDS OF DIFFERENT TERMS OF FULL PROPAGANDA AND INEQUATE FOR Dumb AND NATIONALISTIC TUNED RUSSIAN
                    1. 0
                      26 September 2011 09: 30
                      Quote: ereke
                      It was even clearer with you as a provocateur.


                      Translate into Russian, please!

                      Quote: ereke
                      AND WHAT WITH OUR LANDS WHEN WILL BE THEIR RETURN !!! FROM DON TO ORYNBOR INCLUSIVE !!! AND WHO US OUR EARTH SPELLED BACK, ONLY CUT OFF! CLEAR RESPONSE CAN BE RECEIVED?


                      Of course, you can get the answer. Only not here. This forum does not deal with land acquisition and consideration of applications for them.
                      To do this, try to contact the Government of the Russian Federation in Moscow, they do it there.

                      These screams about "When will you give our lands?" What is it like? A question to which a rational person will not give an answer, but an unreasonable one will perceive as a red rag - trolling, whatever one may say.
                      You are falling ...
                2. Sanzyro
                  0
                  25 September 2011 21: 12
                  In short, there is no answer! All clear! About anything just to not give an answer to a specific question - ordinary trolling!
                3. oper66
                  -1
                  25 September 2011 21: 36
                  I am a Russian surname my Sherbina I am a Kuban Cossack my ancestors from the Zaporizhzhya section - the Black Sea Cossacks they organized the Sherbinovskaya in the Kuban and the historian Sherbina is my uncle’s grandfather, therefore I can and I demand to speak honestly and I myself passed the truth that not everyone dreams of, beat those who are against creatures respect us directly or in transfer only strength our ancestors were strong not only physically but also spiritually therefore they were worshiped all need to raise self-esteem and those who disagree in the nose
                  1. ereke
                    -3
                    26 September 2011 05: 45
                    I didn’t ask you for Oper66, but this Krasnodar samurai (there is a Krasnodar in the profile, I don’t know if the truth corresponds to reality or not) Sanzyro Is it too primitive to Russian or is it so insignificant that Russians? By the way, you can also be judged by your statements in this category, or are you a troll?
                4. oper66
                  -2
                  25 September 2011 21: 47
                  I am a Russian surname my Sherbina I am a Kuban Cossack my ancestors from the Zaporizhzhya section - the Black Sea Cossacks they organized the Sherbinovskaya in the Kuban and the historian Sherbina is my uncle’s grandfather, therefore I can and I demand to speak honestly and I myself passed the truth that not everyone dreams of, beat those who are against creatures respect us directly or in transfer only strength our ancestors were strong not only physically but also spiritually therefore they were worshiped all need to raise self-esteem and those who disagree in the nose
            4. oper66
              -4
              25 September 2011 20: 29
              but how do they minus us all we say friends no they are not friends they are enemies or not self-confident individuals until Russia is strong each herd will try to argue there is only one way to beat not obedient Russians are not a people and not a Russian nation - the concept of civilization are those people who they helped to teach and heal, but you all know that friendship and mutual assistance mean nothing at the moment, only credit and credit are respected but dear I read your comments on Tajikistan where like the Russians threw the Nazis you’ve been at least once in a war or seen in a movie like that I have experience and not small 3.7 fighting in them, and Armenia and Chechnya 4 skin injuries and two shell concussions and all I was 33 g retired since 2004 major and I just feel disgusted to read komenty and I explain to you Kazakh again that eas at the time of the service there was no division into Russians and chocks we were one whole division, let's continue the argument for the sake of the future of Americans
              1. Sanzyro
                -1
                25 September 2011 21: 21
                Not sickly "fraternal" people threw minuses? You can't make anyone happy, the Strugatskys were right!
                1. oper66
                  -3
                  25 September 2011 23: 05
                  san cons talk about the plus means we hit their nerve and they know that we owe it to our people by the fact of their existence and the possibility of reproduction only with an increase in the number of individuals, the brains remain at the level of 1 individual-chuchmek = chock chushka = chuchmeku
                2. ereke
                  -1
                  26 September 2011 05: 48
                  It’s who puts the minuses to you already shouted in comments like they are like that, and who, under my comments, I won’t write right away the bold minuses are drawn, but I was silent about it and didn’t act so hard
              2. Sanzyro
                0
                25 September 2011 21: 29
                Not sickly "fraternal" people threw minuses? You can't make anyone happy, the Strugatskys were right!
              3. ereke
                -1
                26 September 2011 05: 55
                Well, this is always so hiding if there are no other arguments, with your military past, but those who hide and say every step of the way about glorious deeds from their military past didn’t actually stay close or somewhere in the materiel or canteen . On my own I know and saw those who were hiding behind the armor and were in shock, and you can’t understand anything like that either. Father is a member of the Union of Veterans of Local Wars (Czechoslovakia, 1968).
          2. nnnnnnnnn
            -3
            24 September 2011 19: 45
            What is the concept of "Kazakh nationalism" in your concept when a sovereign country speaks the state language ?, and if Kazakhstan was geographically located on the border with Europe, such as the Baltic States, where the Russian-speaking population does not speak Russian for a long time and Russia is silent because it is Europe. lands you do not read the late Solzhenitsyn with his opus how to equip Russia. What Cossacks are you from? So learn history! carefully, thoughtfully at first I advise you to read "The Word about Igor's Regiment" in the first lines you will find what you are looking for. Do not argue that way, otherwise agree that the Tatars will say this is ours, Bashkirs, Caucasians, Yakuts, small peoples of Siberia, etc. Chew what is now, and do not arrange Manezhka on the site.
        3. LESHA pancake
          -2
          24 September 2011 14: 18
          GOOD WORDS BUT THEY MUST BE CONFIRMED.
    11. +3
      23 September 2011 20: 00
      Can you talk for a long time? to u ... u, and the essence was briefly and correctly stated by Uncle Sam - you want to eat for free. Nothing in Kazakhstan will be good without Russia. The tops chop it off, but the "elite" cannot part with the malakhays (figuratively) And there will be no end to these quirks until the situation is roughly the same as in Hohland and sensible guys like Marat won't talk loudly and resolve issues.
      1. Marat
        -2
        23 September 2011 23: 02
        Thank you for remembering me Esaul,

        I think we should not allow a cat to run between our nations because of some narrow-minded people or provocateurs

        And this article seems to me not necessary - even if there are some disputes and mutual settlements, there is no need to "politicize" them - let the authorities figure it out and agree

        Of course, I would not want Russia and Kazakhstan to start disputes over "mutual settlements" as with Belarus and Ukraine. I'm sure it won't come to that

        We are all close peoples and republics and we all remember our common life in the USSR - and we are trying to at least partially but return the common that connected
        1. Dovmont
          -2
          24 September 2011 08: 18
          The tops do not give a damn about the aspirations of peoples - ethnologized clans that have come to power in all the absolutely republics of the CIS (in Russia the Zhid clans seized financial and industrial power) surrounded themselves with almost fabulous luxury, plunging deeper and deeper into all kinds of debauchery in search of more and more entertainments. And the masses, especially in the Central Asian Republics, go farther and farther into medieval poverty and lawlessness. Our bais, gentlemen and gentry had their brains filled with fat until they seemed to have realized that the world government had long laid eyes on the resources controlled by local princes and sultans. We have the good fortune to observe the options for weaning and redistributing mineral resources in the modern world. The only way to oppose the global Zionist government is to create a single Eurasian state. But this is unacceptable for homegrown nouveau riche, for them their own pockets are more expensive than national interests.
          1. ereke
            -3
            24 September 2011 18: 27
            This is not the point, we lost our independence once. by the majority through the fault of the same agha-sultans who betrayed the people and helped the Russian empire turn the Kazakh lands into their colony. As if this time it didn’t come out so well under the beautiful slogans about "Zhidomossonskaya collusion and division of the world". Ideological you are stronger even here in your jewelery you scare Kazakhstan and drive us your ideology, regard us as a former colony. That is why one cannot converge with the former metropolis. An example of this is Britain in its former colonies, together with the new ally of the United States, is pursuing a neo-colonial policy. And even to Australia, a careless attitude and sarcasm, they say, we sent especially dangerous prisoners there to exile, now they have been replenished with various emigrants from Asia in general, complete crap. The Australians got fed up with this and they left the community. And by the majority of votes of their citizens they proclaimed the country a republican form of government.
            1. Sanzyro
              -1
              25 September 2011 10: 26
              Yes, dear ... Learn the materiel! With history you have a bad time, as well as with any representative of generation-P. A colony, then Kazakhstan was ?? What a familiar song. Recently, this has often been heard (this cry is called a song) from all corners of our former, immense! Read the posts of your compatriot Marata, there is a much more balanced position, without illusions! This is the problem of rapprochement between Kazakhstan and Russia, that over the past 20 years of chaos and strife in our countries a new tribe (very trusting) has grown up young, not far. And certain circles make good use of this, introducing any nonsense into uncharged heads ...
    12. Sergh
      0
      23 September 2011 20: 42
      Why are you arguing, guys, this is normal ... Here's another interesting thing: "The Russian part of the territory in the Guiana Space Center covers an area of ​​120 hectares ...", well, I probably won't continue, you will find it yourself in a search engine.
      That's all the fuss. There was a cow, but it died. As it is there "We do not appreciate, we lose, we cry ...". Well, before, say, until the 50th year, the boom will work or ..
      1. Sanzyro
        -2
        24 September 2011 00: 40
        It only happens in fairy tales - the fox asked to visit, but the bunny survived - but in life everything is different! At a party, you know, at a party ... And put in place quickly! So do not roll out the sponge. feel
    13. Sergh
      -1
      24 September 2011 06: 48
      And who is so picky, went through everything, stuffed the minuses?
      If something is not clear, I will explain. Russia is slowly but surely moving away from Baikonur to the east, most likely together with its personnel. But to the east this is the second stage, and the first has already begun from October-November: a spaceport is ready for Kourou in French Guiana. Since 2007, the first stone has been laid, which was brought from Baikonur from the Gagarin launch (?). With two sets of Soyuz-ST-B launch vehicles, the first launch will be made there already and in a month. Kuru launches will increase payload from one to four tons of payload. A joint space project with the French will give great commercial potential, all and other advantages will give the maximum economic effect.
      That's basically short. Yes, by the way, the Mistrals here (well, this is my opinion) are likely to play an important role, most likely in the group they will participate in the protection of the water borders of both cosmodromes in French Guiana and in the Far East. And Russia began to restore a large fleet. Though slowly, noverno.
      As a result, it can be seen with the naked eye that Russia is withdrawing large strategic capacities (this is also illustrated by other examples) to its territory or under a serious irrefutable agreement with a good economic plus, although there are different opinions, but the picture is visible in some places!
      1. LESHA pancake
        -1
        24 September 2011 14: 39
        THIS IS INEVITABLE TO HUNT WHEN HIS Cow is milked.
      2. oper66
        -5
        24 September 2011 19: 57
        Well then, Kazakhstan can clear the future of Baikonur and save it as a museum in which ereks will work and only firecrackers will be launched instead of rockets
        1. ereke
          -2
          24 September 2011 20: 17
          Why firecrackers? As the Russians themselves say, "A holy place is never empty" They left us the economy after the USSR (by the way, all this was done from the common fund from the investment of all the Union republics) in the general treasury in Moscow, which collapsed before our eyes due to unprofitability, heavy industry production fell by 70 % in 1994 (according to German economists, if the recession reaches 30%, then the state should become bankrupt) and Kazakhstan was able to rise by 1999 with the help of foreign capital and investment and technology, and the agro-industrial complex and heavy industry went into growth, especially in metallurgy (Indian capital) and in mechanical engineering (Korean investments and capital) And the Russian Federation was then also a young state, solving its economic and political problems and could not simply help physically. So let's break through the operas
          1. oper66
            -1
            24 September 2011 22: 32
            good luck no one advocates for the collapse and why profitability has fallen just production has become throughout the former USSR and there is no one to work on
          2. Sanzyro
            -1
            25 September 2011 12: 37
            Wonderful man ... Chess word! wink So the fact of the matter is that empty does not happen. And it will not be empty, but not yours anymore! Where else can you find such "occupants" who will build you developed socialism ?? Throughout history, only the hares did this on their own ... And with the new owners, it is not yet known what position you will be in! feel
            1. ereke
              -3
              25 September 2011 13: 36
              People who have no modesty and impure thoughts always say that they won't find them better than me, or they won't find them better and kinder than us. Probably you don’t remember how you sarcastically noticed that developed socialism was built on the bones of the people who built this developed socialism. Or have you forgotten that on the territory of Kazakhstan there were such well-known camps as ALZHIR (Akmola Camp for the Wives of the Treason of the Motherland) and KARLAG for enemies of the people? And that they survived is possible despite and with hope for a bright future and a great desire to live at least for the sake of children. We do not need others and your power is also inappropriate, we do not need various experiments from the Marxist-socialist to the capitalist, we do not need any "occupants", including hares and your favors and those of others, we also do not need. We stand for equal partnerships and mutually beneficial relations, and with you it is clear who we are talking about. If something does not suit you, you can move your own way, only without us, And the point on this other can not be
              1. Sanzyro
                -3
                25 September 2011 15: 06
                1) "not" with verbs is written separately! 2) If you are trying to isolate yourself from the world, then it has not fenced off from you! 3) Your home-bred beast is in no hurry to send you something into the 21st century. 3) Equality for you may well be ensured on the other side of the Chinese border - do not eat your food ... 4) And by the way, I have no more questions about nationalism ...
                1. ereke
                  -4
                  25 September 2011 15: 38
                  Well, this is a purely Russian move, right away if you don’t know the Russian language and start to get smart (and there’s nothing more to reveal your stupidity) I’m not considered Russian, but I doubt that you can also correctly express thoughts in another foreign language, right away right away. As for China, throw here a propoganda spreads, for twenty years of independence, something China has never thrown us over with hats. although the economic was and is stronger than Russia now. They export more of their products to the United States and the United States, being their main debtor. But Russia has been trying to carry out political and economic expansion with arrogant stubbornness over the past few years, lobbying for its interests and belittling our interests in an open and even informative way and clouding people's heads by type we are good and doing everything right. Yes, you can look at any Russian site in comments so there the audacity of computer suckers and Russian degenerates and direct insults, undisguised or veiled Nazism suffices, and not only with respect to Kazakhstan as well as other former union republics. Gidomassony rest their propaganda. And it's good that you are not China. there aren’t any opportunities, otherwise you wouldn’t write with your fraudulent methods, you’ll set yourself against not only Pindos but also all the former republics to complete hatred, but what you have to pressure is gas and oil and we don’t have it need))
                  1. 0
                    26 September 2011 09: 45
                    Quote: ereke
                    Well, this is already a purely Russian move, immediately if you don’t know the Russian language and begin to be clever, (and there’s nothing else to hide your stupidity about)


                    You try without insults, huh? Here there are more advances in this regard, if that.

                    Quote: ereke
                    I don’t think I’m Russian, but I doubt that you can also correctly express thoughts in another foreign language, immediately and immediately.


                    Well, since this site is Russian-speaking, then so be so kind as to spend time installing at least an attachment to the broomstick and text pre-moderation. type in the Word, and then copy here.
                    For example, I don’t speak Kazakh, and I don’t tag at sites that are in Kazakh, for example.
                    And my thoughts, for example, can be expounded in three languages, so what? Want to try? Easy. And you will not find one in any translator.

                    Want to be respected - start with yourself and respect others.
                    Quote: ereke
                    Yes, any Russian site can be seen in comments. There, the impudence of computer suckers and Russian degenerates and direct insults, not covered up or veiled Nazism, is enough not only for Kazakhstan.


                    No, I'm bastard ... And what did you want after "Russians, bring down to Russia", "Give us our lands" and other things? I am silent about what you write. What they say. And how they do it. Do you have any facts that the families of Kazakhs were thrown out of the territory of Russia, threatening in every possible way? And I have a shaft.

                    Quote: ereke
                    Well, what do you have to push, because it is gas and oil and in it we do not need))


                    No, well, except for gas and oil, there is still something in the bins ... wink

                    And for Baikonur like this ... I think it will be possible to launch Petards. But not more. Because it is unlikely that the USSR, as a legacy to future competitors, is unlikely to be left. So what, and we still have a lot of explosives. For the fact that we can not take out.

                    But for some reason I am sure that this will not happen. Over the years of 20, oligophrenic observation (not to be confused with oligarchs) and clowns in the government of Kazakhstan were somehow not observed. And even ayfonist will be able to agree with reasonable people. In case of emergency.
                    1. ereke
                      -3
                      26 September 2011 20: 12
                      And you, I’m watching here the adjustable Banshee jewelry pedal type both ours and yours, as a result it turns out ours and we mean wrong and our mother is wrong. I’ll follow your advice and stop discussing on Russian sites, my colleagues have been saying this for a long time, talking to hell with these tugadums, but they don’t understand simple words in their neighbors, but somehow they’ll find themselves in another country so that their tails are pressed better than Ivan not found. In short, you need to think about Kazakhstan
        2. Sanzyro
          -2
          25 September 2011 15: 24
          Tie Ishakov to starting farms. This is a MEGA-hitch! Eternal!
          1. ereke
            -4
            25 September 2011 16: 02
            You are probably a respected button player, confusing us with other people. We are nomads and not dehkans, and raised horses. We adhere to these traditions and now what a nomad without a good horse-tulpar. You are already starting to move on to inappropriate insults asking for bad words and deeds))
      3. Sanzyro
        0
        25 September 2011 15: 31
        No, bye, alternatives to Baikonur! Not yet! And in Guiana, it will never be ours! Judge for yourself! When the devil is on the horns - what is it yours ?? So, partnership ... Not forever and unequal. In Kazakhstan EVERYTHING was built from scratch and then we were asked! And you are Guiana ...
        1. Ivan35
          -1
          25 September 2011 17: 59
          Sanzuro! Ereke! Tie it up! You are right men and everyone has their own position - but there are no insoluble contradictions between you and you are not enemies - this is the main thing!

          Now some kind of Nazi troll (even Russian or Kazakh) will appear and pour "kerosene" into your discussion - I would not want the readers of the site to decide that there are some real problems and contradictions - by and large there are practically none.
          1. ereke
            -2
            26 September 2011 06: 13
            Yes, I also understood the inadequacy here is complete, I wanted to be tied up with the comments, so these trollies have already passed on to the arrogant direct insults of my people. It seems impossible according to the rules of the site or is the law for such unwritten? he answered a couple of times then. And so it’s all useless to say it already, but such thoughts are not well known to them. Because of them, others will think that all Russians are like that, think from here why why they treat Russians like that ...
            1. Ivan35
              -4
              26 September 2011 12: 26
              Well, here I agree with you, they don’t like you - and they should swear and insult you personally - and not the whole nation
              They slid down to the level of the Nazis (fascists - whatever you call one essence), insulting all your people personally instead of you. It's disgusting!
              Do not judge by these 2-3 about all Russian

              Do not give in to provocations and do not slide down to their level - I am sure that some of your comments are just "rash" - it was not enough for you and me to start arguing for the joy of the "trolls"

              I myself am from Almaty and I have many friends of Kazakhs - many of them consider themselves Communists (like me)
              1. oper66
                -1
                28 September 2011 10: 01
                it’s understandable that you have friends from the Kazakhs red and from alma-ata, but the eric from the first kament makes territorial claims to Russia and accuses Russia and Russians of their capture of the occupation of the loss of independence in a nationalistic vein — and you accept at this stage you persuade that they say Kazakhs are so pretty, but the fact that he behaves rudely proving that they are almost the first nation and says that he is happy to wait for the Saxons to come, he sends all his comments in an anti-Russian vein, plus him proving that he’s right - someone already understands your agreement communism but enough internationalism no one has learned the lessons of the past - at least one former republic and the USSR people said thank you to Russia - there are no prtensias and dislikes even the Kyrgyz people after the Baltic states require an indemnity from Russia even if there is one loud voice but there are others there will be others in the fact that the Kazakh police conducted a passport check and in the fact that they believe that everything that has been done at the baikonur it’s their merit and it belongs to the cities erected by the Russians and their cities and it is expressed by Erica that the mood among Kazakhs flourishes there are no respected streams of claims or forgiveness of pogroms 90 and attitude to Russians, and here you are Compromisers and have shamed Russia and the Soviet Union allowing them to consider themselves superior to others
      4. Sanzyro
        -3
        25 September 2011 21: 39
        To the question of the fleet ... Have you heard about the exercises in Kamchatka ?? Well read it!
        1. Sanzyro
          -2
          26 September 2011 00: 30
          Inarticulate cons ... And what, does our fleet flourish ?? Did I say something wrong? The article on the exercises is available for free, everywhere, read! But even without it, it is clear that our fleet, frankly, is rotting!
        2. nnnnnnnnn
          -1
          27 September 2011 21: 10
          I served there from 1990 to 1996 in the 25th division of the SSBN and lived on PKZ-35 for two years, and my classmates are still 80% crap, but the rest is true.
    14. nnnnnnnnn
      +4
      24 September 2011 20: 02
      Dear Sergh, as in the classic "where is Kura, and where is the dacha?" About the "eastern" cosmodrome, I was there a year ago, while only the taiga and budget money are sawing. The fleet of the Council of Deputies was sold on metal and in what condition it was shown by the war with Georgia. they even gave the commander of the boat a Hero of Russia, and the cruiser Moskva did not even fart from its basalts, the question is why, and therefore the Russian Federation today does not have an orbital grouping to provide target designation to sea-based cruise missiles, and these are only surface ships but also submarines ... GLONASS? but the special forces in the Caucasus are walking on American GPS. cool Russian special forces on Pindos GPS Baikonur is the foundation on which Roscosmos makes money, but I can't understand for whom? Yes, probably in your car GPS, I beg your pardon, the navigator is probably definitely not GLOSSnasovsky?
      1. Sergh
        +1
        26 September 2011 00: 34
        Ha! Well, with a cruiser it’s more or less clear, five torpedo ones and I wouldn’t even raise sails. GLONASS speak? This is already pleasing. I have GPS-GLONASS, I will say THING, complements each other and more precisely. So what ?, In addition to Russia and the USA, there is still silence, and in two years I think Glonass will reach the level.
        1. Sergh
          +1
          26 September 2011 00: 55
          YES, MORE, I'm still wondering? Why didn't the Georgians shave? They also had bullets, well, like Granites. Then I guessed, in the commander's place, if I am, if I shoot at the Russians, then the Khan of Tbilisi !!!
    15. +3
      25 September 2011 01: 18
      Lovely scolding, just amuse. Kazakhs are a good people, they managed to build their own (what kind of) economy. The Russians, of course, were sent, but they themselves, especially, do not climb. I consider them friends, as well as Belarusians, even brothers ..))
      1. Ivan35
        +2
        25 September 2011 17: 53
        Totally agree!
      2. Sanzyro
        -3
        25 September 2011 21: 30
        Oh, how ... They built an economy ... Something new! Of course, they sent the Russians - well, they would not have been sent, because they built the economy, what for now they are needed ?!
    16. slan
      0
      25 September 2011 16: 47
      Provocative article. No one in the Russian Federation has problems with Baikonur, and Vali Falin is directly hysterical. Almost certainly his maiden name Falman, or even worse. In the comments I saw the Kazakh nationalist for the first time. And something tells me that it is very unlikely that he is writing from Kazakhstan)) Of course, in any family there is a monster, but in general, this is alien to the Kazakhs, especially since they are on the Internet.
      1. Ivan35
        -1
        25 September 2011 17: 52
        I agree - the article is a provocation. There are enough threats in the world - and we should not share anything with either Belarusians or Kazakhs. We do not need the regions of Kazakhstan and some parts of Belarus - we need to unite as a whole - Moscow will still be the capital - and this is what’s going on

        And about Yereke I don’t agree - yes, he has a national dignity - but he is not a nationalist - it seems to me that he simply discussed and expressed his opinion there - where he considered the comments incorrect and offensive to the Kazakhs

        In general, Kazakhs are internationalists by nature - I live here and apart from these stupid innovations, the nachset of the language does not feel any discomfort.
        It seems to me that there is no need to publish such articles at all and provoke such disputes - it's good that everyone stayed within the "framework" - as Dmitry T said - "the cute ones scold only amuse themselves"
        I think that we and the Kazakhs were and will be - they (I assure you!) Will be closer to many Russian peoples from Russia
        1. slan
          +1
          25 September 2011 18: 04
          Quote: Ivan35
          And about Yereke I do not agree

          I probably inattentively read his posts, I apologize.
        2. Sanzyro
          -2
          25 September 2011 21: 14
          I heard from these internationalists back in the 80s - Russians get out this is our city! The song is old ... They were nomads - they remained nomads! How many minuses were thrown, Baikonur, it turns out they built ... Who would have thought ?!
          1. 0
            25 September 2011 22: 51
            Ereke is definitely not a nationalist. Just an expression of thoughts is. Well, the Kazakhs were never the brakes ever.

            Quote: Ivan35
            I think that we and the Kazakhs were and will be - they (I assure you!) Will be closer to many Russian peoples from Russia


            Definitely. It binds too much, and the blood is total spilled, and work.

            Quote: Sanzyro
            I still heard from these internationalists in 80-s - Russian get out, this is our city!


            Every family has its black sheep. I heard this in Ukraine, in Estonia, and in Azerbaijan ... There are rabid idiots everywhere.

            Another question, in some arrogance, due to the elementary desire to show that they, too, are not sewn. So LET !!! let them say, and let them show that there is nothing like that in it.

            My grandfather was in Kazakhstan, my father was born in Dzhezkazgan, I also often visited relatives before. Well, here they are, with their cockroaches in their heads, but to whom I would trust my back, one opinion. Kazakh. At least, they throw less purely in their heads. Everything is simple - either your own or someone else's. without throwing. And we are with them for a long time. No fools.
            There are all sorts of things with such a difficult being, which we went after the year 91. But we live ... And we will live.

            Strength in unity, no matter how cool. Therefore, dear, that's enough for you already. The article is really strange, a wedge of a sort. There is nothing to provoke provoking and throwing over each other. We are in the same trench.
      2. oper66
        -1
        26 September 2011 01: 02
        so the name of the girl’s folder knew how to name the daughter
      3. ereke
        -2
        26 September 2011 07: 41
        I am writing from Kazakhstan, now I am in Astana, and so I’m from Almaty. I am a moderate-thinking person. You have not yet seen true nationalists, They are simply not enough on Russian-speaking and Russian sites. And I’m Kazakh, and when you read the comments of Russian users about savages and chocks or a type of sucker, you will soon suck at the Russians, etc. Here, already involuntarily, you will become a Nazi-player and begin to hate Russians
        1. +2
          26 September 2011 08: 48
          Quote: ereke
          You still do not see these nationalists, They are just a little on the Russian-speaking and Russian sites.


          Saw, saw. And not only on sites.

          Quote: ereke
          And I’m still Kazakh, and when you read some Russian users' camments about savages and chocks or suckers like you’ll be sucking soon, etc. Here, involuntarily, you will become a NaziNist and start hating Russians


          The same stone can be sent to your garden.
          And everything is explained by the same thing: there are plenty of freaks and geeks both there and here. Consoles one thing: them a little. they are just loud.

          In fact, it starts to strain a little. It seems as if we are participants in some kind of experiment of the "house2" type. First there was a hohlosrach, then they got hooked on the Belarusians, then again with the Ukrainians, now with the Kazakhs ...
          Hopefully, coincidence, coincidence, etc. And then so not long and play up to paranoia.
          Is it even necessary?

          Bottom line: ereke, try to look from the positive. On sites where Natsik stick out only a headache can be grabbed and a spoiled mood. The greatness of the People as such is not determined by the amount of excrement dumped on the Internet.

          And as for the international graters, everyone is good there, both yours and ours. In the Voronezh and Saratov regions, whole villages are inhabited by those who have left Kazakhstan, and no one experienced something positive from this move. There were enough kinks. As well as we have plenty of idiots, whom the line in the passport "place of birth" unnecessarily excites.
          1. Ivan35
            -1
            26 September 2011 11: 45
            Banshee! You are wonderful! As always - thank you for being on this site!

            To Yerek — don’t think about all the Russians according to 2-3 nationalists — you also see them — they planted such people in the Soviet Union and shot under Stalin!

            Do not slip to their level even in the heat of controversy - then you will play into their hands and into the hands of external enemies, both ours and your people! You were provoked to no longer needed ones - extra comments with which I would argue already - (Banshee wrote to you already about them)

            Visit our site (and do not succumb to provocations)!

          2. Ivan35
            0
            26 September 2011 11: 54
            Banshee! You are wonderful! As always - thank you for being on this site!

            To Yerek — don’t think about all the Russians according to 2-3 nationalists — you also see them — they planted such people in the Soviet Union and shot under Stalin!

            Do not slip to their level even in the heat of controversy - then you will play into their hands and into the hands of external enemies, both ours and your people!
        2. mar.tira
          0
          27 September 2011 07: 17
          And you go to the Tolda-Korgan steppes closer to the border. Local Kazakhs hate you as much as Russians.
        3. ytqnhfk
          +4
          29 September 2011 23: 05
          You’re wrong here as you can read the entire list of comments, you were patted up and you answered adequately, but all your opponents agreed that the Kazakhs are a good old friend whom nobody really wants to lose! And for the account of chocks and all other insults, for example, I know that in Russia they say so not about Kazakhs but about other Caucasian peoples, even Armenians are also respected (of them there are many cardiac surgeons and other sensible people of different professions)! In general, the word chock here often means a stupid person, it so happened that Caucasian peoples also fell under this syllable !!
    17. 0
      26 September 2011 10: 11
      About the article - there’s nothing to comment on. Kazakhstan did not invoice, and who said something is not important.
      And I want to say from the comments:
      Marat, Ivan35, Banshee was once again convinced that there are still smart people who are not amenable to nationalist provocations. nnnnnnnnn, thanks for the information on mutual settlements, it is a little sobering hot heads ...
      ereke, do not fall for provocations so easily, you started the discussion so well, I agree that some comrades have clearly "bent" and slipped to the level of a shaved punks. I beg you not to associate them with the Russian people. We read nationalistic comments with great shame .... Especially from the Russians.

      As for the territorial divisions, you will all agree that the land has often passed over the centuries either in one hand or in another, and now, to arrange a bloody bickering, how then to fight? First pair on a pair, and then the survivors? Both the Russians and the Kazakhs have plenty of land, neither of them needs this sort of showdown.
      1. Ivan35
        -1
        26 September 2011 11: 56
        My respect and sincere respect, our "red Jeanne d'Arc!
    18. -1
      26 September 2011 12: 42
      Regarding what I wrote above: my relative wrote to me the following:

      “There have been no official statements regarding the requirement for migration cards. But there is information that such incidents have taken place. A check will be carried out. Personally, there is an intention to change the access system, only it has nothing to do with migration cards, everything is just beginning. Judging by the information received, someone out there on the spot out of service zeal overdid it. As you say, make the fool pray to God, he will break his head. Never mind. "

      Something like this ...
    19. Gur
      +2
      27 September 2011 08: 46
      I’m trying to write a comment for the second time, I deleted it the first time .. like a lot of things in my head and it turns out rubbish with bitterness ... but still decided ..
      I don’t know who needs this and for what purpose, but the situation in Kazakhstan on ethnic grounds is again aggravated. It seems after the events of 86 years after the people of manifestation, so to speak, more or less settled down, moreover, after the collapse of Kazakhstan became independent. And here again, the question is raised about the Russians and the Russian language. And "who said what" according to Solodova (by the way, congratulations on joining the Communist Party of the Russian Federation) is constantly being picked up by the masses, so it's not just that, with the proposal to ban the Russian language as a second interethnic language tore the Kazakhs off. Now constantly here and there, these graters begin, from the store to the clinic. From simple neglect to hysterical scandal with the transition to interracial relations. Peaceful life in Kazakhstan is gradually ending, more and more religion is going on, more and more young people with beards and girls in hedgehogs are appearing in the country (like that). And I do not completely share the optimism of Ivan and other living Russian speakers in Kazakhstan. As for the statements of Ereke, competently and extensively .. almost the entire history textbook of Kazakhstan, the current school course in short, it remains only to name the favorite dog of Ablai Khan and how many teeth his horse had (no offense, because there are such questions at UNT) I am a man of the Soviet formation and I relate to the whole new history and rewritten skeptical. Each newly created state seeks something in the history of the hitherto unknown. The beginning is from the Russians, some kind of utter nonsense about the origin of the Western peoples from the Rus or the Ugrians, about the capture and collapse of Rome by Russian barbarians, to the Tajik views on the construction of the wheel. And the story with whoever built what and who taught whom whom, too, should already remain in history. Russia and Kazakhstan separate states (not looking at the HARDWARE) when sharing claims for the constructed and for the help in the war did not show. So no one owes anything to anyone. As for China, one can only recall (though not only Kazakhstan but also Russia) that they have not yet canceled maps with the Chinese borders to Almaty and to Khabarovsk. Although I know Kazakhs who visit China less often, they agree to expansion already. And an example of Uighurs (or they don’t know about this experience .. which is unlikely) they are not scared. And the fact that China, despite all the water treaties, on its own initiative parses Eli and Irtysh for irrigation without leaving anything to Kazakhstan and Russia, also says nothing? And the conclusion ... I think so, although this is geopolitically not true, but the Russian leadership should have a headache about it. If our interethnic relations are so painful, let the Russians leave peacefully, that is, compensate for the cost of housing (at least) and do not write inscriptions like "do not buy houses from Russians, they will soon be ours," maybe then peace and mutual understanding will come? When everyone will be at home and there will be no one to blame? Then how much will the population of Kazakhstan decrease? And who will work? ... although there are practically no production facilities in Kazakhstan. As for Baikonur, history has already shown .. that Kazakhstan cannot cope with such an object. After the 90s, the city fell into decay .. boarded up windows and camels grazed through the streets. After signing the lease .. he had to rebuild his son. Musabaev, on his fingers, explained to Majelis everything about Baikanur about prices and compensations.
    20. nnnnnnnnn
      +1
      27 September 2011 21: 39
      The gentlemen started about Baikonur and ended up with a normal Baba swara. If we figure out whose chosen people, we will not go far. The Russians are terribly fond of the words "chock", "black-other, etc. I do not understand you Federation and chock of the so-called very many, the same Kazakhs who are citizens of the Russian Federation and in the Chechen wars many of these" chocks "were killed for RUSSIA (oper66 you say a major of the reserve skin in the holes, but it seems to me that YOU are simple office plankton, and if you were, then you belong to the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs). I have not seen any Nazi running through the streets of cities In Kazakhstan, beat the Russians with shouts, Kazakhstan is for Kazakhs, well, I saw and did not hear, they came in summer friends from the Russian Federation went to Alakul (this is in the steppes of the Taldykurgan region), the guys liked it and were very surprised that we speak Russian and many do not have an accent. trolls. Conclusion Baikonur is needed by the Russian Federation, it's a no brainer that no one is going to increase the rent in the contract, this is clearly described. As far as I remember, there are documents that clearly distinguish between the activities of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Internal Affairs Kazakhstan across Baikonur.
    21. oper66
      -2
      28 September 2011 21: 25
      when it seems that you are baptized and don’t understand this swar, you’re telling me to insult me, you’re trying to better explain how to understand that the renaming of Russian cities of Pavlodar begins
      there is something to answer, or again you are cute narrow-film pussies or that there is a ban on the Russian language and Russians are surviving
    22. mar.tira
      -1
      29 September 2011 08: 10
      Yes, to say something, nationalism in Kazakhstan is growing every year. They do not like the Russian mentality, and the achievements of the Soviet people in the construction of the industry and agriculture, Kazakhstan. I recently witnessed in a store in Northern Kazakhstan, young Kazakhs drove a Russian woman out of the store 50 years old and said that she would go to her home in Russia. We were in two cars, and when they saw us they left immediately. THIS IS FOR YOURS! And this is from impunity and permissiveness, encouragement by the leadership of such actions. Rob, all that isn’t made you but at any predlogom.Vot my sister and went to Kazakhstan, he took out, or when you do not forget how mockingly watched the once good neighbors-Kazakhs to our fees and Departure.
      1. ereke
        +1
        30 September 2011 04: 03
        mar.tira- I see you are quietly playing off and skillfully tune in to the Kazakhs, in a word, a troll, a computer sucker, do you think no one understands your intentions? What kind of young Kazakhs are they driving a Russian woman out? You seem to have never been to Kazakhstan. Kazakhs are hospitable people of the East and, among other things, they respect the elderly and old, so this is a mess. If they beat them up, regardless of their nationality, even if they are Russian or another, and among themselves Kazakhs also cut ourselves off if there is a joint of some kind, this is the case everywhere. Speak in two machines? if you need at least three cars, if you screw up the joint carelessly, even two Kazakhs will make you harden without problems. And all who were Russians to the neighboring Slavic state, half returned, those who received citizenship did not return there is no way back. My neighbor sold my house and dacha in general and left for Russia in 2001, returned but nowhere to live, it's good that his elder sister lives in the suburbs, she gave him her dacha. I met him in 2008 in Almaty and said, "Fuck Russia, I'm a Kazakhstani, this is my home." You should have read the weekly "Karavan" in 1996, how one Russian family moved there when we had devastation here and everything began with the collapse of the USSR. There, in addition to Moscow and St. Petersburg, the rest of Russia is a wilderness and, as the Russians themselves say, cattle live who only work for booze and then until two noon and then a smoke break until evening and talk about politics. So he started to work hard here and, like an oriental man, he began to grow the farm with goodness, he started several dairy cows. the house took a good one. So he was not given a place to live. The son was beaten and published by the locals at school, calling him a kulak son; the girls from school were also not brought in with the daughter. (you see, they took an example from the elders to see the booze in the kitchen, as is customary for you, they scolded the Kazakhstani, and the children hear everything) One fine day, a cow from pasture came to their home, someone from the local cut her stomach with a knife, her intestines dragged along the ground , He sold everything and returned, to -removed- this Russia I'm a Kazakhstani and that's it.
      2. Gur
        0
        30 September 2011 12: 02
        Dear do not bend ... what does the mentality and achievements have to do with it .. re-see your projection on any republic of the CIS, and you will get the same thing. It's just that we are all on the post. space have lost the feeling of fear. All are trying to self-expression and self-assertion of both the individual and the state. What brought us together before ... one idea? maybe ... and fear? probably .. and the Second World War showed that he (fear) was not unfounded. In the USSR, after the war, everyone from the Balts to the Tajiks could get Lyuli. And not just in the form of a nuclear fungus. Now a wolf in sheep's guise .. everyone is smiling, but when he breaks our herd into separate states .. everyone will remember what fear is. Maybe it will be like Iraq or Libya, or maybe not. And there are more and more such wolves lately. China, Turkey, NATO and the United States, Islamists, radicalists, drug mafia .. Then we all from "black-asses" to "Russian pigs" will remember everything .. and that we were silent about what was happening in everyone in the country .. and someone and contributed to this, but it will be too late to whine as if by the will of the USSR, and there is no one.
    23. bosxxl
      -2
      29 September 2011 14: 26
      Forgot who their fuck and feeds
    24. ereke
      -1
      30 September 2011 04: 11
      And here the Russians live comfortably and no one touches them, even if they fight, it’s for business or booze, whether he be Russian or Pole or German or Chechen or other ethnic groups of Kazakhstan. In Almaty, Russians have two or three apartments each, visitors rent one or two, there are so many Russian apartments rented out, and visitors from villages are regularly paid without unnecessary conversations and try to enter trust in the tenants of the apartment.
      1. Gur
        0
        30 September 2011 09: 14
        Not everything is so rosy respected hereke, there are problems and they grow like a snowball. The influx of returnees has stopped and the flow of those leaving is increasing. In Almaty, this fact seems to be not very obvious, but near the violent centers licking this picture well. In particular, in Sary Ozek ... of the Russians there are only those who have no place to go and no one to go to. School classes from Russians consist of 8-9 people. (1-3 classes are simply not there) Yes, there is your truth that we Kazakhstanis, despite the fact that we are going to our historical homeland, so to speak, cannot settle down and join ( to drink and so on) with the local violence, the same happens in Kazakhstan with the Uralmans .. clashes arise everywhere and the locals are no longer so at ease. Coming from Russia who went to visit the graves and all that .. meeting the former neighbors of the Kazakhs .. the Kazakhs of course arrange a feast despite the fact that there may not have been very good relations before the district .. and everyone tries to invite them into their house and treat them (this cannot be taken away the Kazakhs) and began to complain .. why did they ask you left .. now the Uralmans have settled .. with their cockroaches in their heads. (The Uralmans are a separate song) So we are Kazakhstanis .. we are losing mutually unequivocally from what is happening. And what is going on here is correct to make comments (if all the other g .. omit), then all these interethnic conflicts on the territory of Kazakhstan .. are often made from the connivance of the authorities and the silent contemplation of Kazakhs who do not agree with this state of affairs, so that they are not considered, I do not even know what to call it, not a patriot or something. Here the deputy spoke in the majelis (I don't remember his last name, but it takes time to look, the thought will go away) on the account of the introduction of the Kazakh language and the abolition of Russian. He said that the Kazakhs themselves first need to figure out their own language .. prepare a base (translate a large stock of world works and knowledge into the Kazakh language), agree on the transition to the Latin alphabet, etc., etc. Well, what was he called after that ?? and the man said quite reasonable things. And if you need my phone number and address, I can provide it anyway without the KNB. If you really go to the KNB at the same time ask for am. and from me and my children and relatives .. let him also deal with those who write inscriptions of such contents "Russians do not leave, we need slaves and prostitutes" industrial area of ​​Ust Kamenagorsk as well as the one that I wrote above .. arising everywhere.
        1. ereke
          -1
          30 September 2011 10: 29
          Here is the GUR official statistics from Rosstat (unpleasant, but read to the end). From Russia since the end of the 80s of the last century, i.e. when officially opened the borders 40 million Russians left for permanent residence, mainly Russians and Jews (twice the population of Kazakhstan). The main countries of moving are the USA, Israel, Canada. The export of capital in 2009 in Russia reached about 2 trillion. dollars mainly to the UK and the Commonwealth countries (Cyprus), and by this indicator, Russia is in the top five per capita in% of the amount of exported capital annually. In Russia, three people are born, five die every hour. Those. Russian population growth minus -2 per year. In a word, Russian is getting smaller.

          And at the expense of nationalist inscriptions, I also drove to Almaty last year to see such inscriptions on a transformer booth in the form of graffiti: OYAN KAZAK! ... etc. generally. These are young people, teenagers in high school, after the 90th year of birth, they didn’t really communicate with Russians in life, for them Russians are a stereotype that they created in their head looking at a zombie man about youth organizations of Russian Nazis (also young) or about the conversation of some adults . Nationalism is blooming now with all the colors of the rainbow everywhere, Even in old Europe (the example of Breivik who put a good dozen of his fellow citizens into the grave from an army carbine, from nationalist feelings)
    25. ereke
      -2
      30 September 2011 04: 26
      In general, these independent media outlets need to find out the addresses and names of the Admins that I notice something wrong here ... Go to "Barlau" here in Astana, building # 8 (syrtky barlau, foreign intelligence special service) ask them what they are doing there I am aware of what is going on on independent media resources and whether they know the admins and moderators all the data, what kind of household mafia is, they are trying to turn everything into chaos, they think they will probably get enough of this, and the titles of the articles are legal, as well as the USA for the bases in Turkey are huge money is paid and nothing, even happy, even though the bases themselves were built on a foreign land. I'll have to go to Almaty there in the KNB there are people close friends classmates, Soon I warn you all addresses and telephones immediately bosxxl yours too, I'll try to break through your data (of course I won't show it to the public), otherwise you probably won't stop like that, considering yourself safe
    26. Gur
      0
      30 September 2011 11: 31
      For me, it’s not news that you wrote .. besides, in the 80s we were all for Europe and another world — Russians ... a large number left, including from Kazakhstan .. Germany, Greece, Canada, Israel, Australia. Because of the problems that are written above, and it’s not only possible because of the desire to live and not survive, and there are bablos to implement this idea, people prefer to go to hell. For the export of capital, I think this is not a national trait .. but the philistine. It’s also no secret that the Kazakhs are not inferior to the Russian oligarchs in buying up real estate and exporting capital. Both act at the same time together ... stealing and pulling away their countries. With regard to mortality and population growth, Kazakhstan makes up for its losses at the expense of the Uralmans. Yes, now there are many pregnant women on Almaty street, God forbid, but in Kazakh families, one child is no longer an isolated fact, and the problem of drug addiction and alcoholism is also growing. And the problems of medicine? even speaking is probably not worth it. So this problem is more likely not only of the Russians but of all post-Soviet republics. The situation is the same in Ukraine (there are some connections). As for nationalism, the fact of the matter is that all this flourishes with the tacit consent of adults and authorities. And it’s not a fact that you can’t make a jerk to a sucker sucking a nap and a lop-sided whole puddle, you won’t get the same in the face from the crowd .. and a policeman who comes up will not give you a club.
    27. -1
      30 September 2011 16: 08
      Really a bitter topic. In all nations, someone is cultivating the Natsiks ... What can I say, biting not only on ethnic grounds, on class, on political, someone looked poorly, someone laughed at the wrong time, that's all, conflict. Only a pretext is required. Aggression in society is growing. Someone says that flashes in the sun, someone from an unsettled life, someone from impunity.
      In the Tambov region, they do not like Russian visitors. They don’t know what ethnic Kazakhs look like, but they don’t love us a priori, because we are from there. Now it’s not so, but I know there have been cases when visitors were set on fire at home. And not to the rich, but to ordinary workers, who were hunchbacked by all families from morning to night.
      I think the manifestations of Nazism among Kazakhs and Russians are someone aimed at discord, the aggression of young generations who grew up in gangster 90 on bloody action films and in life and on TV.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"