The Three Deaths of Iskander

88


The word "Iskander" reveals awe at impressionable Europeans. Behind this word they imagine “a terrible Russian cudgel”, which at any moment can fall upon them.

This is an operational-tactical missile system (OTRK) "Iskander-M". It was put into service in 2006 year and since then every year plays an increasing role in the traditional (since the time of Peter the Great) dialogue between Russia and Europe about building relationships between these two worlds.

Placed in the Kaliningrad region, "Iskander" can sweep half of Europe. Since these complexes are extremely mobile, which was well shown by the teachings of the rocket men of the Western Military District, which took place in early December last year, it is almost impossible to destroy them preventively if the situation in the European theater of operations becomes complicated with conventional weapons that NATO has here. Therefore, any mention of the fact that Russia, as a sovereign state, can put Iskanders in the vicinity of Kaliningrad, causes a panic attack on impressionable European politicians. However, few people know that it was they and their overseas partners who directly contributed to the fact that Russia had this formidable weapon.

The fact is that by the mid-80s of the last century, American and European politicians finally managed to break the military-political parity with the Soviet Union in their favor. A number of international treaties signed at that time, in fact, disarmed our country in areas of strategic importance to NATO. One of them is operational-tactical missile systems with nuclear charges, with the help of which the USSR could really "break through" any resistance in the European theater of operations (in the Russian classification with the OTRK include complexes with a range of 100 to 1 thousand km, in the western - from 300 to 3,5 thousand km). And it was these complexes of the Elbrus type (firing range up to 300 km), Temp-S (900 km) and Oka (407 km) that in many respects provided a balance of forces between the Warsaw Treaty countries and NATO countries in Europe. For example, the Oka and Temp complexes were hit by the positions of American ballistic Pershing-2 and ground-based Tomahawk cruise missiles. Moreover, it was precisely the Soviet strategy - NATO was guided by the development of shock aviation with high precision weapons. But, in fact, the Soviet strategy at that time was more effective than the western one. “Unlike aviation, which had weather restrictions and the need to pre-conduct complex organization of air operations, missile systems could be used for nuclear attacks immediately. The enemy did not have any protection against ballistic missiles, ”emphasized historian Yevgeny Putilov.

Reference: "Iskander" in the basic version is a self-propelled wheeled launcher, armed with two solid-fuel missiles, which deliver combat units weighing up to 500 kg each to a distance of 480 km. Missiles can be equipped with high-explosive fragmentation, penetrating, high explosive incendiary, cluster, cumulative, space-detonating and even nuclear warheads. The launch time of the first rocket "from the march" - 16 minutes.

Interval between shots - 1 minute. Each machine is fully autonomous and can receive target designation even on photographs. “The complex does not depend on reconnaissance satellites or aviation. Targeting can be obtained not only from them, but also from a special combined-arms reconnaissance vehicle, a soldier artillery spotter or from a photograph of the terrain, which will be inserted into the onboard computer directly at the combat position through a scanner. Our homing head will accurately lead the rocket to the target. Neither fog, nor a moonless night, nor an aerosol cloud specially created by the enemy can prevent this, ”noted one of the founders of Iskander, Nikolay Gushchin.

The 9М723К1 rocket of the Iskander-M complex with a launch weight of 3800 kg develops a speed of up to 2100 m / s at the initial and final stage of the flight. It moves along a quasi-ballistic (up to 50 km altitude) trajectory and maneuvers with overloads of the order of 20-30 units, which makes it impossible to intercept it by all existing means of missile defense, since they would have to do times overload with 2-3 overload.

In addition, the rocket is made using stealth technology, which also makes its detection extremely difficult. Accuracy of hitting the missile at the target (depending on the method of guidance) - up to 1 to 30 meters. Another modification of the Iskander is armed with P-500 cruise missiles. Their speed is 10 times less than that of 9М723К1 missiles, however, Р-500, according to some sources, can fly over 2 thousand km at a height not exceeding a few meters above the ground.
Therefore, in 1987, the United States and its allies convinced the then leadership of the USSR to sign an agreement on the elimination of short and medium range missiles (INF). He touched, first of all, OTRK Temp-S; However, in fact, the new Oka went under the knife. “The official motivation of the Americans in demanding the reduction of the 9K714“ Oka ”missile system within the framework of the INF Treaty was that the American missile of the same size could have a range of 500 kilometers. The Soviet "Oka" on tests showed the maximum range of 407 kilometers. However, the position of Soviet negotiators allowed the Americans to demand a unilateral reduction of the Oka complexes under the slogan “You promised.” What was done "- recalled Yevgeny Putilov.

The decision to liquidate the Oka and cease work on the Oka-U (firing range is more than 500 km) and OTRK Volga (he had to change the Temp-S), of course, was a terrible blow for the team Mechanical Engineering ”(KBM, Kolomna), which was engaged in the development of tactical and operational-tactical missile systems from 1967 of the year, and personally for the chief and general designer of KBM Sergey Pavlovich Invincible. By that time, as the head organization, KBM had already developed and organized the mass production of almost 30 missile systems for various purposes, including the Shmel, Malyutka, Malyutka-GG, Storm-V anti-tank missile systems, and Sturm-S, equipped for the first time in the world with a supersonic rocket, Attack, Strela-2, Strela-2M, Strela-3, Igla-1 anti-aircraft missile systems, and high-precision mobile tactical and operational-tactical missile systems "Tochka" (70 firing range to ), "Tochka-U", "Oka", "Oka-U". Therefore, Invincible did the almost impossible - he went to the Central Committee of the CPSU and achieved that the Central Committee and the USSR Council of Ministers in 1988 decided to start experimental design work on creating a new OTRK with a range of up to 500 km. Moreover, with the liquidation of the Oka, our country really remained completely without OTRK, since Elbrus had already been, in fact, removed from service, and Tochka-U worked only at a distance of 120 km.

Thus was born the "Iskander." However, a year later, it seemed, the project would be closed, because at the end of 1989, Sergei Pavlovich the Unbeatable resigned as head and general director of KBM. They say they left loudly, slamming the door, saying unflattering words about “orders” that were imposed on the leading defense enterprise by “perestroika” .... (He further worked as the Chief Scientific Officer of the Central Research Institute for Automation and Hydraulics, was the scientific director of the Reagent Scientific-Technical Center, and then returned to KBM as an adviser to the chief and chief designer of this enterprise).

But work on the Iskander continued. Moreover, he became “two-horned,” that is, it was decided to install on the launcher not one, as was always done in the Soviet engineering school, but two missiles. “The KBM was given the task: the Iskander should destroy both fixed and moving targets. At one time, the same task faced Oka-U. Oki-U prototypes were destroyed along with Oka under the same INF Treaty. The reconnaissance-strike complex, into which the Iskander was to be included as a means of fire destruction, was called Equality. A special reconnaissance aircraft was developed, which is also a gunner. A plane detects, for example, tank column on the march. Transmits coordinates to the OTRK launcher. Further, it corrects the flight of the rocket depending on the movement of the target. The reconnaissance-strike complex was supposed to hit from 20 to 40 targets per hour. It took a lot of rockets. Then I suggested placing two missiles on the launcher, ”recalled Oleg Mamalyga, who from 1989 to 2005 was the chief designer for the KBM OTRK.

In 1993, the President issued a decree on the deployment of development work on the Iskander-M OTRK, for which TTZ was issued, based on a new approach to building the complex and optimizing all solutions. However, now the economy is in the way of a new weapon. The scope of the test OTRK 20 suggested rocket launches. According to the recollections of the employees, there was enough money to launch ... only one rocket a year. They say that the then leadership of GRAU, together with the staff of the KBM, personally traveled to the enterprises - manufacturers of components for the "Iskander", and asked to make the "required" number of parts. Another six years - 2000 on 2006 year, took to conduct state tests of the new PTRC. And, in fact, only with 2011, the Iskander-M began to be mass-produced, as part of a long-term contract between Engineering Design Bureau and the Russian Ministry of Defense.

Abroad, the complex is not yet available - it is not enough. And since the holy place is never empty, the place of the Soviet-Russian OTRK on the world arms market was taken by the Americans with their ATACMS complex developed by Lockheed Martin Missile and Fire Control with an inertial guidance system and a firing range from 140 to 300 km, depending on the modification. They are in operation with the 1991 of the year and are launched from MLRS M270 MLRS launchers (on the tracked base of the BMNUMX Bradley BMP) and HIMARS (on the wheel base of the FMTV tactical truck). The USA actively used these complexes during the wars with Iraq of 2 and 1991 and actively sold them to Bahrain, Greece, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, South Korea, etc.

The armies of Western European countries now, in practice, have abandoned the use of operational tactical missiles (OTR). The most significant number was in France. But this country removed them from service in the 1996 year, and since then there is no serial production of OTP in Europe. But Israel and China are actively working on this topic. In 2011, the Israeli Armed Forces adopted the OTRK with a solid-propellant ballistic missile LORA (firing range - up to 280 kilometers) with an inertial control system integrated with the CRNS “Navstar” (GPS) and a television homing head. China, according to some data, annually produces up to 150 tactical and operational tactical missiles with a firing range of up to 200 km. He not only intensively saturates his southern coast with them, but also offers to Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Turkey, and Pakistan. And China is not at all embarrassed to get any sanctions on the part of anyone.
88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    7 March 2015 06: 59
    If you want peace, get ready for war. Nowadays, a very relevant saying.
    1. +10
      7 March 2015 09: 31
      "There is a very relevant saying in our time." This saying is relevant at all times ...
      1. gorge1945
        +9
        7 March 2015 13: 04
        And you should not forget that you will not contain your army, you will contain someone else's.
        1. +7
          7 March 2015 18: 27
          Quote: gorge1945
          And you should not forget that you will not contain your army, you will contain someone else's.

          "If you want peace, prepare for war."
          "you will not support your army, you will support someone else's."
          You can remember for the thousandth time about "two friends - the army and the navy".
          Can you write something fresh?
          1. 0
            12 March 2015 05: 26
            How is it with Volodya Mayakovsky?
            "We have words to the most important
            They become a habit, they wear out like a dress! "
        2. +1
          8 March 2015 05: 41
          A saying from the time of honest wars, the times when they did not carry out coups and did not set their own people. Having the latest methods, and the army will not help. She will simply stand aside, or, as usual, will obey any leadership that came after the overthrow.
          The USSR had a powerful army, and so what? But there is no longer the USSR, and no matter how powerful the army, it will not be able to help. The army is not a panacea.
          1. 0
            8 March 2015 20: 40
            Do you want to defeat the enemy, fight with his own weapon.
          2. 0
            8 March 2015 20: 40
            For these purposes, we have our own MTR.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +21
      7 March 2015 10: 47
      Good product! By the way, it is very good that it keeps the airfields of "partners" at gunpoint, covers the runway, even before the engines of NATO aircraft warm up. They have to keep their aircraft outside the range of Iskander, and this is more fuel consumption. The same is with other bases.
      1. +8
        7 March 2015 22: 07
        Shooting OTRK Iskander cruise missile R-500.
    4. +20
      7 March 2015 14: 33
      Quote: sezam
      If you want peace, prepare for war.

      I believe that at the center of Russia it is necessary to establish the stella of the country's patriots, who helped it to survive in difficult times. And there, in gold, enter the names of S.P. Invincible, V.P. Gryazev, A.G. Shipunov and many other designers who, contrary to the vile policy of the Gorbachev-Yeltsins, did everything they could to Russia to remain a Great Power.
      1. +2
        7 March 2015 22: 11
        In the St. George Hall of the Moscow Kremlin, on the walls are lists of Heroes of the Russian World!
    5. +1
      8 March 2015 20: 38
      Europe is "embarrassed" by our Iskanders in Kaliningrad, but we should not be bothered that the Chinese OTRK near our borders and shoot through almost all the largest cities in Siberia and the Far East ???
    6. crane13833
      0
      9 March 2015 23: 08
      we ourselves need to prepare, I mean people I have a friend in the army now they are eating and sleeping, they don’t even have fizuhs, why should we serve a little more than 3 months, will we hope that someone will fight for us?
  2. +27
    7 March 2015 07: 14
    How many equipment were cut in the 90s to please amers, the witness himself! Wow, how they caved in to the bourgeoisie for the humanitarian aid and tranches of the IMF. Thanks to Gorbi and Boriska ...
    1. +21
      7 March 2015 07: 51
      Quote: Boot Chrome
      . Thanks to Gorbi and Boriska ...

      For "Oka" only to Hunchback. (Boris later pulled himself up) The ice ax is crying over him.
    2. -35
      7 March 2015 08: 58
      Quote: Boot Chrome
      How many equipment were cut in the 90s to please amers, the witness himself! Wow, how they caved in to the bourgeoisie for the humanitarian aid and tranches of the IMF. Thanks to Gorbi and Boriska ...

      What again ... I didn’t hit a finger on a finger to protect YOUR country, everyone is to blame except for yourself! Well, you are for these children, not men.
      1. +9
        7 March 2015 10: 36
        Quote: Civil
        Quote: Boot Chrome
        How many equipment were cut in the 90s to please amers, the witness himself! Wow, how they caved in to the bourgeoisie for the humanitarian aid and tranches of the IMF. Thanks to Gorbi and Boriska ...

        What again ... I didn’t hit a finger on a finger to protect YOUR country, everyone is to blame except for yourself! Well, you are for these children, not men.

        Yeah, Comrade Civil, with a show-off, repulsed everything he could, especially his fingers on the keyboard. hi
        Surely in the stash took a dozen "Pioneers" and a couple of BZHRK. laughing
        1. -20
          7 March 2015 11: 37
          Quote: Wheel
          Quote: Civil
          Quote: Boot Chrome
          How many equipment were cut in the 90s to please amers, the witness himself! Wow, how they caved in to the bourgeoisie for the humanitarian aid and tranches of the IMF. Thanks to Gorbi and Boriska ...

          What again ... I didn’t hit a finger on a finger to protect YOUR country, everyone is to blame except for yourself! Well, you are for these children, not men.

          Yeah, Comrade Civil, with a show-off, repulsed everything he could, especially his fingers on the keyboard. hi
          Surely in the stash took a dozen "Pioneers" and a couple of BZHRK. laughing

          Jeans probably worn out to holes? Gum not choked? How's your Coca-Cola dream going?))
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +9
            7 March 2015 14: 16
            It is these evil "comrades" who defiled the USSR, all the best and decent in our country, you always lack something, it might be better to start with yourself!
          3. +6
            7 March 2015 14: 20
            Guys, what a bazaar, after all, these two leaders of the country really brought the armed forces and the economy to a complete ass, in some kind of Islamic country they would both have been hanged for such things, and here they are respected former presidents. If America got so many freaks in the country's leadership , then it would not exist long ago, but we live nothing.
            1. +5
              7 March 2015 17: 27
              Quote: SAXA.SHURA
              with us they are respected former presidents

              Well, respected only by their accomplices. I would not speak for the whole country.
      2. +4
        7 March 2015 18: 37
        There are simple men and patriots who could do everything on their part and faithful oaths have fulfilled their duty !! But what kind of bird are you and whose flights will you still have a question !!!!
        What again ... I didn’t hit a finger on a finger to protect YOUR country, everyone is to blame except for yourself! Well, you are for these children, not men.

        I wonder how many fingers you beat off to knock on the clave ?? !!
        My son is fighting in the Donbas, and you are a hero sitting on the couch and knocking on the keyboard such a whole correct and smart rambo keyboard !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
        1. -5
          8 March 2015 21: 19
          Quote: rasputin17
          My son is fighting in the Donbas, and you are a hero sitting on the couch and knocking on the keyboard such a whole correct and smart rambo keyboard !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          For your mistakes and fights, the weak, ungrateful children of the USSR, your fathers left you a country, and you say it in the words of Comrade. Stalin about ... whether!

          Does it hurt my eyes? How can teens not admit obvious facts? So after all, you will die without repenting for the fact that responsibility was passed from YOURSELF to the real PASSERS ... in 1917 there were people, in 41-45 people .. and you ... just no words
      3. +4
        7 March 2015 23: 54
        We carried out the order. And the army itself did not cut. There were civilian specially imprisoned uncles. They announced to the servicemen: you’re going to take new equipment to Mirny soon ... And then the servicemen under the knife: go home.
        1. -6
          8 March 2015 21: 24
          Quote: Boot Chrome
          We carried out the order. And the army itself did not cut. There were civilian specially imprisoned uncles. They announced to the servicemen: you’re going to take new equipment to Mirny soon ... And then the servicemen under the knife: go home.

          The commandant and all the staff, including the cleaning lady of Auschwitz, also complied with the order, but this did not remove the responsibility from them.
    3. heccrbq06
      -15
      7 March 2015 09: 31
      And thank you, for BZHRK.
      1. 0
        7 March 2015 14: 07
        Stash left
      2. 0
        8 March 2015 17: 17
        So they seem to have already been put on combat duty .. Che is wrong?
    4. +5
      7 March 2015 09: 41
      Yes, they didn’t bend, they were just in power, and even now there are some agents of influence of the Americans, if not direct agents of intelligence of the USA and England
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. -11
            7 March 2015 18: 50
            Ale garage !!!! You cheated rams absolutely !!! If you are fried all and sundry then why measure this clamp for everyone ??? Get used to it once your share and do not measure your caftan on others because it is sewn on you and at your will !!


            Judging by your vocabulary, dear, the brilliance of mindless mindless intellect can be seen from far away. However, FSIN workers can always go to their Vertuhai forum and not stick to the military, the real military.
            1. 0
              9 March 2015 21: 21
              Are you a military man? Really fair?
    5. gorge1945
      +5
      7 March 2015 13: 07
      E.B.N and his associates knew what they were doing. They deliberately robbed and helped the West destroy Russia.
  3. +5
    7 March 2015 07: 20
    Do not be shy about your COMPLEXES!
  4. +9
    7 March 2015 07: 22
    The fact of having guaranteed retaliation like May rain cools the bald patches of many ardent Western politicians.
  5. 0
    7 March 2015 07: 35
    "It is practically impossible to preemptively destroy them in the event of a complication of the situation in the European theater of operations with conventional weapons, which NATO has here." But what about unusual weapons? Not very clear.
    1. +5
      7 March 2015 10: 23
      Vigorous long loafs are unusual. Due to their high power, they do not need surgical accuracy. A warhead with a special warhead near the positions of Iskander will fall out - that's it, hello. But it is advisable to unload the conventional warhead by position, and the more precisely, the greater the chances. That's just the PU moves, so getting into it is extremely difficult.
  6. 0
    7 March 2015 07: 53
    Dear, the complex is good, but time does not stand still, it is necessary to develop new missiles, with "complex" trajectories and with increasing range, to make a universal system based on the complex
  7. +2
    7 March 2015 07: 53
    Yes, Peter had a better dialogue.
  8. +8
    7 March 2015 08: 14
    It’s impossible to describe weapons without pathos and excessive imagination?
    The word "Iskander" awe awe-inspiring Europeans.

    Who exactly? I am sure that the term "Iskander" does not evoke any emotions among most Europeans due to their ignorance of the subject.
    Located in the Kaliningrad region, Iskanders can shoot half of Europe.

    Illiteracy of the author is amazing. It turns out that all of Europe is a patch of 1 thousand km in diameter. the center falls on Kaliningrad. again a victim of the exam?
    Therefore, any mention of the fact that Russia, as a sovereign state, can put the Iskander in the vicinity of Kaliningrad, causes a panic attack among impressionable European politicians.

    Again an attempt to pass out wishful thinking. Who can scare a high-explosive fragmentation warhead weighing 400 kg? Let’s say our 40 missiles will be launched, by analogy it’s 40 aerial bombs weighing 500 kg., And so what? Will it cause irreparable damage? In WW2, the British and Americans bombarded Germany with a million of these bombs to cause irreparable damage, no one will notice 40 bombs. And what's the point of bombing Poland when the main NATO forces are next?
    It moves along a quasi-ballistic (up to 50 km altitude) trajectory and maneuvers with overloads of the order of 20-30 units, which makes it impossible to intercept it with all the existing missile defense systems, since they would have to do maneuvers with overloads 2-3 times larger.

    Maneuvering with gas-dynamic rudders is possible only with a working solid propellant rocket engine, which does not work on the entire flight path. At the terminal site, maneuvering is possible only with aerodynamic surfaces that become effective only at altitudes below 10 km. Before that, the missile is vulnerable to missile defense systems like THAAD.
    The armies of the Western European states have now practically abandoned the use of operational-tactical missiles (OTR).

    Because they are inferior to aviation weapons in many ways.
    1. Flexibility.
    The aircraft is not limited by the presence of passable terrain, bridges, etc. .. The speed of the aircraft is several times greater than the speed of the OTRK.
    2. Range.
    The range of the OTRK is limited by the characteristics of the rocket. The range of destruction of the ASP is the sum of the combat radius of the aircraft and the characteristics of the rocket.

    Using tactical cruise missiles as part of the OTRK is also not practical because it is easier to launch them from an airplane.
    1. +10
      7 March 2015 08: 32
      In the article there are blunders above the roof. After reading "Each vehicle is completely autonomous and can receive target designation even from photographs." The complex is not dependent on reconnaissance satellites or aviation. Target designation can be obtained not only from them, but also from a special combined-arms reconnaissance vehicle, a soldier of an artillery fire spotter or from a photograph of the area, which will enter the onboard computer directly at the combat position through a scanner "did not read further. Immediately I imagined how a fighter photographs the terrain in profile with a soap dish from a height of 1.7 meters, and a miracle algorithm converts this image into a picture from the top from a height of a couple of thousand meters. Nobel laureates nervously smoke on the sidelines ... wassat
      1. 0
        7 March 2015 10: 08
        Oleg, are you seriously tied up with translations and photo reports? Here, on the site, besides politics, there will soon be nothing to watch
        1. +7
          7 March 2015 20: 08
          Good day to you, Professor. Interview of the Invincible in the "Shock Force" series in the "Invincible Complex" series (if I'm not mistaken). As far as I remember, "Tochka" had three guidance systems, which led to such accuracy. And I don't see anything strange from the photo - space images stored in memory. It remains to find out the place of launch and direction (attach). In flight, the rocket "maps (maps)" the terrain and ... get Point to Point. And there is no need to talk about Iskander.
          Nijas burns everything. Tactical nuclear charge and half-Berlin in the ashes. All specialists put this rocket among the most formidable weapons in Russia - precision and virtually invulnerable. Try to find the launch site, if it is mobile. That is, the answer will come for sure. And calculate the interception time yourself at a speed of up to 7M and a range of 500km. Okay, 250 sec. with a maneuvering target, the maximum at the final stage of the flight will understand what is happening. And if it’s closer, the chances are generally 0. Then Kiev decided to join NATO (800-1000km to Moscow) and look at the Kremlin’s reaction. hi
          1. 0
            7 March 2015 21: 35
            Quote: Kasym
            And I don't see anything strange from the photo - space images stored in memory. It remains to find out the place of launch and direction (attach). In flight, the rocket "maps (maps)" the terrain and ... get Point to Point. And there is no need to talk about Iskander.

            We carefully read what the author writes:
            “The complex is not dependent on reconnaissance satellites or aircraft. Target designation can be obtained not only from them, but also from a special combined arms reconnaissance vehicle, a soldier of an artillery fire spotter or from a photograph of the area, which will be inserted into an onboard computer directly at the combat position through a scanner. "
            Who will take this photograph if "the complex is not dependent on reconnaissance satellites or aircraft"?

            Quote: Kasym
            Tactical nuclear charge and half-Berlin in the ashes.

            I do not discuss the use of nuclear weapons.
        2. +5
          7 March 2015 21: 29
          Quote: Tlauicol
          Oleg, are you seriously tied up with translations and photo reports? Here, on the site, besides politics, there will soon be nothing to watch

          Everyone must do their job. Articles (not scientific) are my hobby. I’ll add up to 500 and tie it. fellow
          1. +1
            8 March 2015 01: 24
            Yes, it’s clear that an amateur. Especially about art. gunner. belay . Space images (which could have been taken in advance and the target is static-building for example) are laid at the base site. And when patrolling, it remains to indicate the goal (if it is not previously laid) in the photo and location (launch), set the direction. It turns out that it is really autonomous.
            And about nuclear weapons - it's me Nayhasu (Nayhas). Who writes that there is no sense. hi
      2. 0
        7 March 2015 23: 16
        Somehow I rarely add professorial commeteriums, but here I would put a second one.
    2. +4
      7 March 2015 08: 33
      I agree with you. Located in the west of the Kaliningrad region, these OTRKs in real life can only shoot at Poland - they do not even reach Berlin!
      These missiles are effective only with a nuclear warhead and against the deployment of NATO troops in Poland, preparing to attack Russia. Agree - a very limited application!
      They say that there are developments to increase their range up to 3000 km (adding a step, etc.) .. But then they fall under the limitations of the INF Treaty.
    3. +4
      7 March 2015 08: 35
      Again an attempt to pass out wishful thinking. Who can scare a high-explosive fragmentation warhead weighing 400 kg? Let’s say our 40 missiles will be launched, by analogy it’s 40 aerial bombs weighing 500 kg., And so what? Will it cause irreparable damage? In WW2, the British and Americans bombarded Germany with a million of these bombs to cause irreparable damage, no one will notice 40 bombs. And what's the point of bombing Poland when the main NATO forces are next?

      And if these 40 warheads are tactical nuclear charges?
      1. -1
        7 March 2015 09: 12
        Quote: Rostovchanin
        And if these 40 warheads are tactical nuclear charges?

        Another question. But then there is no such b / h ...
      2. 0
        7 March 2015 09: 52
        Initially, all OTRKs were created under WMD (nuclear or chemical). But now the START treaty forbids them from having a nuclear warhead, for example. And without this, the combat effectiveness of the complex tends to zero
        During the local conflicts, several thousand! OTR of Soviet, Russian, Chinese, Iranian, American production released:
        Iran-Iraq war - about 800 missiles
        Afghan - 2000!
        Persian Gulf 500! Africa, Asia, the Caucasus - hundreds! Etc. etc ... Results? Zilch
        1. +1
          7 March 2015 19: 23
          Quote: Tlauicol
          Persian Gulf 500! Africa, Asia, the Caucasus - hundreds! Etc. etc ... Results? Zilch

          Have you personally reported on the results of the use of OTRK? In Chechnya, for example, a huge congestion of manpower was covered with a Point, in Georgia in 2008 a tank battalion near Gori. Iskander in our case will apply:
          1- Against a technologically advanced adversary, simultaneously with the deployment of air defense systems in order to deprive him for some time of the possibility of using AVIATION, one of the key elements of the struggle in the 6th generation war, therefore, elements are used to overcome missile defense and electronic warfare.
          2- It will also be applied pointwise, it will definitely not be against long-range artillery. The objectives of the OTRK will be command posts, strike air bases, missile defense systems. MI here needs the most secretive and fast, accurate strike in order to paralyze it for a while, and then finish it off with cruise missiles, or do you think knowing about the approach of aviation and subsonic missile launchers, enemy aircraft, will line up on the air force and will wait for a strike on its own? Here he is the main + Iskander, the real performance characteristics of which we do not know. Yes, in the Iskander-K variant, the vehicle carries 6 КР Р 500, and not 2 as in the exercises, but this is a "secret".
          3- Once again I repeat Iskander will be used in combination with other snacks that we don’t need to know about, OTRK is only an element, even the president talked about it
          By the way, there is the Bastion complex, it also has the ability to shoot at ground targets, but only the KR.
      3. +1
        7 March 2015 19: 07
        Quote: Rostovchanin
        Again an attempt to pass out wishful thinking. Who can scare a high-explosive fragmentation warhead weighing 400 kg? Let’s say our 40 missiles will be launched, by analogy it’s 40 aerial bombs weighing 500 kg., And so what? Will it cause irreparable damage? In WW2, the British and Americans bombarded Germany with a million of these bombs to cause irreparable damage, no one will notice 40 bombs. And what's the point of bombing Poland when the main NATO forces are next?

        And if these 40 warheads are tactical nuclear charges?

        I will try to give an example; let it sound a little silly:
        If you take a needle and stab an adult in the stomach, he will not be pleased, but he will endure it, but if you suddenly, unexpectedly prick exactly in the eye, then this will surely make him disabled and deprive him of the opportunity to resist for a long time, So the needle is Iskander, and you cannot compare it with a bomb flying with a maximum of 200 km and then with an engine, at low speed. So one can compare a free-falling 2-ton bomb of WWII times with Iskander's "small" warhead.
      4. 0
        9 March 2015 13: 07
        Yes, even if the rocket is in normal equipment, these 40 missiles can withdraw all the enemy’s military factories, and there will be nowhere to build tanks, planes, ships. If a 500 kilogram warhead hits the factory floor, production will be completely destroyed, machines and conveyors will be dismantled ...
    4. 0
      7 March 2015 09: 45
      Quote: Nayhas
      It’s impossible to describe weapons without pathos and excessive imagination?

      Apparently, you can’t ... laughing


      Although, if you take a sober look at things and call everything by their proper names, the possible effectiveness of the current Iskanders on the proposed theater in Europe is close to zero.
      The only real goals available to them are elements of the missile defense system created by users on the territories of Poland and Romania, and disabling runways of airfields in border areas, which, alas, does not.
      For real control over the European theater of operations, complexes with a radius of 3-5 thousand km are needed, but the INF Treaty impedes their creation.
      All the hysteria (it’s hard to find a better word) on the Iskander issue in the media is nothing more than a public relations campaign.
    5. +5
      7 March 2015 11: 04
      Quote: Nayhas
      Because they are inferior to aviation weapons in many ways.
      1. Flexibility.
      The aircraft is not limited by the presence of passable terrain, bridges, etc. .. The speed of the aircraft is several times greater than the speed of the OTRK.
      2. Range.
      The range of the OTRK is limited by the characteristics of the rocket. The range of destruction of the ASP is the sum of the combat radius of the aircraft and the characteristics of the rocket.

      Lose in some respects, but win in general.
      They are less vulnerable.
      They are cheaper
      They can hit a new target faster.
      They are less noticeable.
      They are able to hit more protected targets.
      They are less susceptible to EW.
      1. -1
        7 March 2015 12: 20
        Quote: Spade
        Lose in some respects, but win in general.

        I would argue ...
        Quote: Spade
        They are less vulnerable.

        Come on. For example: the task is to destroy the location of the OTRK Iskander near Kaliningrad with a sudden strike. Three Eurofighter Typhoon take off from the Neuburg air base with a load of one PTB per 2000l. and two TKR TAURUS. They fly to the Baltic in the region of Rostock, there they unload and fly home.
        TKR TAURUS has a b / h weighing 450 kg. and range over 500 km. The rocket flies at low altitude not visible to the radar and confidently hits the target. On which section of the route of attack aircraft is there a threat to their destruction?
        Quote: Spade
        They are cheaper

        Nominally yes. BUT! OTRK Iskander does not know how to shoot down aircraft, destroy tanks and other equipment on the ground, and conduct tactical reconnaissance. OTRK Iskander can only launch 9m723k1 missiles at large stationary targets, he can do nothing more.
        Quote: Spade
        They can hit a new target faster.

        Let us return to the situation described above. If the Bundeswehr had an OTRK similar to Iskander, it would have to turn over the OTRK through the floor of Germany with an average speed not exceeding 50 km / h to accomplish the same task.
        Quote: Spade
        They are less noticeable.

        Yeah, if the complex was located on a semi-trailer that could be disguised as a civilian, then yes, and its appearance will not be confused with anything. The very same rocket at an altitude of 50km. visible in the palm of your hand at any radar at maximum distance.
        Quote: Spade
        They are able to hit more protected targets.

        here I ask you to argue, what is the reason?
        Quote: Spade
        They are less susceptible to EW.

        Modern TCRs like TAURUS or Tomahawk Block IV have the same correlation guidance system and optical seeker as the 9m723k1.

        Hopefully available ...
        1. +4
          7 March 2015 13: 47
          Quote: Nayhas
          TKR TAURUS has a b / h weighing 450 kg. and range over 500 km. The rocket flies at low altitude not visible to the radar and confidently hits the target.

          It strikes an empty place. Aircraft will be monitored from the moment they take off over-the-horizon radars. If they are not brought down to the frontier of using anti-ship missiles by aviation, then theoretically undetectable TCRs will fly their 500 km for at least 25 minutes.
          During this time, "Iskander" will not only complete its combat mission, but also move so that these TKRs will hit an empty space

          Quote: Nayhas
          OTRK Iskander can only launch 9m723k1 missiles at large stationary targets, he can do nothing more.

          Yes? And I heard that a rocket has at least 10 different warheads. From penetrating to cassette fragmentation remote detonation. Fight armored vehicles? Easy. By means of a cluster warhead with self-aiming submunitions.

          Quote: Nayhas
          Let us return to the situation described above. If the Bundeswehr had an OTRK similar to Iskander, it would have to turn over the OTRK through the floor of Germany with an average speed not exceeding 50 km / h to accomplish the same task.

          Pulling a hedgehog on a globe. And if the goal is not in thousands of kilometers, but in three hundred?
          Air defense command post 200 km. from the line of contact. Unplanned goal.
          "Iskander" - stopped, and after no more than 5 minutes a pair of missiles left.
          Aviation ... Well, that’s clear. EW, suppression of air defense, gaining local dominance in the air ...

          Quote: Nayhas
          Yeah, if the complex was located on a semi-trailer that could be disguised as a civilian, then yes, and its appearance will not be confused with anything. The very same rocket at an altitude of 50km. visible in the palm of your hand at any radar at maximum distance.

          To begin with, airfields are large enough targets that are difficult to move. Aircraft are conducted over-the-horizon radars from the moment of takeoff. Well, the fact that a ballistic missile is visible ... Yes, let it be. She is much less vulnerable in flight than an airplane or cruise missile and has a much higher speed.


          Quote: Nayhas
          Modern TCRs like TAURUS or Tomahawk Block IV have the same correlation guidance system and optical seeker as the 9m723k1.

          Actually, I wrote about aviation. The aircraft is more vulnerable than the ground-based OTR complex.

          Hopefully available ...
          1. 0
            7 March 2015 21: 40
            Quote: Spade
            Aircraft will be monitored from the moment they take off over-the-horizon radars.

            From now on, please read more if possible.
            1. 0
              7 March 2015 23: 42
              From now on, please read more if possible.
              One gets the impression that you and your compatriot have the opinion that Russia, in the case of a big kipish, is going to fight with OTRs alone. Air defense, ground waxes, the Air Force, the Navy, and further down the list will participate. We also have a General Staff. And "Iskander" is one of the instruments of warfare, God forbid.
              1. 0
                8 March 2015 17: 30
                It seems that you and your compatriot have an opinion that Russia

                Yes, and I waited for the Iskander to be accused of insufficient ZENIT fire density laughing
            2. 0
              8 March 2015 22: 15
              remind professor who first discovered the launch of a ballistic target in the direction of the Syrian coast?
        2. 0
          7 March 2015 15: 07
          Frank nonsense. Or you don’t understand by what means the air defense system is being overcome today. Or deliberately mislead everyone. Iskander really does not reach the main goals in the performance in which it is now being delivered to the army. But this is not necessary. Remember what means the Americans used when they destroyed the air defense of Yugoslavia? Eurofighter sent? !!! :)
          So there is no need to build a professor if you have nothing to say. You’ll look smarter.
    6. 0
      7 March 2015 16: 28
      Quote: Nayhas
      Because they are inferior to aviation weapons in many ways.

      I fundamentally disagree that aviation weapons are much better than land-based weapons.
      This is true if the side on which strikes are not possessed by an air defense network, or has an air defense in its infancy.
      In any other case, ground facilities win.
      Aircraft will carry radars from the moment they take off.
      In the event of counteraction against air defense, the assertion that the range of aircraft is higher is doubtful.
      And in the event of a conflict "not global))", the need for a launch range of more than 500 km is also questionable.
      Also survivability, much more with ground means, does not need an airfield and runway in working condition.
      And finally, what eventually ALL rests on .... is the price.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. +5
      7 March 2015 18: 57
      Quote: Nayhas
      It’s impossible to describe weapons without pathos and excessive imagination?
      The word "Iskander" awe awe-inspiring Europeans.
      Who exactly? I am sure that the term "Iskander" does not evoke any emotions among most Europeans due to their ignorance of the subject.
      Located in the Kaliningrad region, Iskanders can shoot half of Europe.
      Illiteracy of the author is amazing. It turns out that all of Europe is a patch of 1 thousand km in diameter. the center falls on Kaliningrad. again a victim of the exam?
      Therefore, any mention of the fact that Russia, as a sovereign state, can put the Iskander in the vicinity of Kaliningrad, causes a panic attack among impressionable European politicians.

      I completely agree, not every European knows that Ukraine is a different state, and here is OTRK. For the rest, I will argue, of course, an agreement on missiles <500 km is good, but again, we do not know the real performance characteristics if it is not P 500. Not why keep Iskanders on the border with China or in the Western Military District, if the range is 500 km, for sure it is more, otherwise there was not a lot of noise from NATO after their appearance in the Kaliningad region, at exercises, etc. But there is an advantage:
      First of all, this is a sudden, accurate, massive and, most importantly, a quick strike. Yes, aviation is more mobile, this is clear, and in theory the NATO F 15 carries 3-6 long-range missiles, <1000? True, they are subsonic, but a ballistic missile will cover the airfield in minutes.
      I have a relative in Kaliningrad, so the Iskanders are not there, but he told me so, he said request but if they do, then at least nothing will take off from the territory of Poland, that’s a fact, and they won’t use it alone, it’s an element of a big mechanism.
      From SW. hi
      1. 0
        8 March 2015 09: 33
        Quote: Army1
        of course, an agreement about missiles <500 km is good, but again, we don't know the real performance characteristics

        The range is due to the amount of solid fuel, the dimensions of the 9m723k1 rocket themselves say that even 500 km. that's a lot for her. Its predecessor, the 9M714 from the Oka OTRK, flew 400 km with approximately the same parameters. Although there were no restrictions then. The OTRK Temp 9M76 rocket patched up to 900 km, but its dimensions were also larger.
        So the range of Iskander is real.
        Quote: Army1
        True, they are subsonic, but ballistic missiles will cover the airfield in minutes.

        ..if he is within the radius of defeat, and how many have the enemy at all. For example, in Germany there are seven air bases on which attack aircraft are located, all of them are scattered throughout Germany.
        1. 0
          9 March 2015 13: 10
          The OTRK Temp 9M76 rocket was two-stage, if a second booster stage was set at Iskander, the range would be 900-1000 km.
    9. 0
      10 March 2015 15: 24
      The plane also needs something. The runway, more fuel, needs to train the pilot more time and more health qualification is needed than in the ground forces. The maintenance of air bases is also expensive. There must be a reasonable combination of different branches of the armed forces.
    10. 0
      10 March 2015 15: 24
      The plane also needs something. The runway, more fuel, needs to train the pilot more time and more health qualification is needed than in the ground forces. The maintenance of air bases is also expensive. There must be a reasonable combination of different branches of the armed forces.
  9. 0
    7 March 2015 08: 30
    Very informative article. How difficult Iskander was born ... But, everything is behind!
  10. ABM
    ABM
    +7
    7 March 2015 10: 58
    Because they are inferior to aviation weapons in many ways.
    [/ quote] 1. Flexibility.
    The aircraft is not limited by the presence of passable terrain, bridges, etc. .. The speed of the aircraft is several times greater than the speed of the OTRK.
    2. Range.
    The range of the OTRK is limited by the characteristics of the rocket. The range of destruction of the ASP is the sum of the combat radius of the aircraft and the characteristics of the rocket.

    The use of tactical cruise missiles as part of the OTRK is also not practical because it is easier to launch them from an airplane. [/ Quote]

    like a rocket launcher, in the past (tactical complexes), I do not agree - OTRK can be launched even from the park, turned around and launched. To use aviation, it is necessary to achieve air supremacy - it’s now met over the Baltic Sea, fluttered its wings and fled, in a war, it’s necessary to deal with 10 times the number of NATO forces and their allies (NATO does not include non-European countries such as Australia, Japan, Israel, etc.). In addition, to overcome air defense zones - now they are not deployed, if necessary, there will be more than necessary. Total dry residue - aviation will not exceed OTRK in terms of radius of action
    1. +6
      7 March 2015 12: 47
      I support them as an OTP-specialist for VUS. In the context of the potential QUANTITATIVE superiority of enemy aviation, the Iskanders are a clue to the topic of asymmetric countermeasures. 1) OTP counterargument is strongly limited by the necessary condition for secrecy of basing and stealth of advancement / deployment. Those machines. security is still a lot. It is organizationally difficult, but achievable. Although for the technical park of the enemy's DRGs they pose a serious threat. 2) Improvisation without "eyes of aerial reconnaissance" is practically impossible. That is, we need scouts for STEALTH technology. But, again, the drones that were "in the cradle" at the time of Oka are now quite capable of solving this problem effectively. 3) The most important problem of the OTR: after launching away from the illuminated position and getting to the technical support vehicles that were not hit by cruise missiles or DRGs. Therefore, the launching OTR is a piece, if not a one-time, then 1,5 - one-time. And therefore, without nuclear warheads, it is not a very formidable weapon. In general, the presence of Iskander is better than nothing, but inflicting an effective defeat on the enemy is complicated by a number of conditions.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. gjv
        0
        7 March 2015 18: 43
        Quote: andrew42
        the presence of Iskanders is better than nothing, but the effective defeat of the enemy is complicated by a number of conditions.

        Located in the Kaliningrad region, Iskanders can shoot half of Europe. Since these systems are extremely mobile, which was well demonstrated by the exercises of the Western military district missiles that took place at the beginning of December last year, it is practically impossible to destroy them in the event of a complication of the situation in the European theater of operations with conventional weapons that NATO possesses here.

        Here it is - condition - Kaliningrad region. Strategy "half of Europe at gunpoint"It has been" advertised "for a long time. But the region is not large, and probably not particularly impressionable Europeans have long and closely watched the movement of military equipment along the road network of the Kaliningrad region.
        So, while Iskander remains OTRK for its territory. Or it is necessary to call the Poles (+ Czechs, Hungarians, etc.) to the Warsaw Pact in order to get "half of Europe". Or put into service the P-500, but what about it? Either it is not there, or - "the big secret". If the author knew this secret, he could write "all of Europe right to ... the edge." Or knows, but is silent. Why then - "Three deaths"? what
        1. 0
          7 March 2015 20: 18
          the region is not large, and certainly not very impressionable Europeans have long and closely monitored the movement of military equipment along the road network of the Kaliningrad region. And, in time to discover the arrival of the Iskanders, they will have a practical opportunity to destroy them.

          And why do you think Bridlav is whining loudly about Crimea? Crimea is almost the same Kaliningrad region, but unlike it, it is not controlled in any way by Eurozhop and Matrasnya. And they are afraid. They are afraid to tremble in the knees, because we can place anything there.
      3. 0
        8 March 2015 18: 11
        It is the possibility of installing special warheads in a rocket that scares the bourgeois wink
  11. +2
    7 March 2015 11: 47
    And China is absolutely not embarrassed to receive any sanctions from anyone.

    And what are the sanctions for? If the range is less than 300 km, then please sell and sell.
  12. 0
    7 March 2015 14: 51
    Iskander’s range is not 500 km?
    1. 0
      7 March 2015 18: 51
      Officially, no more, but theoretically it can fly more than 2000 km. True, he will remain K.)
  13. 0
    7 March 2015 18: 06
    The priority goals for Iskander are airfields, power facilities, and radars. Further weapons depots, including Nuclear weapons, as well as headquarters and management infrastructure, command.
    The very same rocket at an altitude of 50km. visible in the palm of your hand at any radar at maximum distance.
    As far as I know, an electronic warfare system is installed on the rocket. Therefore, the option of its easy defeat is unlikely to pass.
  14. ABM
    ABM
    0
    7 March 2015 18: 18
    Quote: fzr1000
    Iskander’s range is not 500 km?


    500 km, but who knows! option E (export) - 280 ...
    the thing is - there are complexes, there are trained crews, new missiles are installed (with an increased flight range) and warheads with special. part (somewhere, probably already stored in stock) - and the weapon becomes strategic
  15. 0
    7 March 2015 20: 16
    It has long been necessary to withdraw from the INF Treaty. And I think ours are waiting for the right moment. Such a moment could be, for example, the supply of NATO weapons in 404.
  16. +1
    7 March 2015 21: 52
    As they say, there is still gunpowder in the powder flasks ... And it pleases !!!
  17. kerim-beck72
    +1
    7 March 2015 22: 47
    Quote: kr33sania
    Quote: sezam
    If you want peace, prepare for war.

    I believe that at the center of Russia it is necessary to establish the stella of the country's patriots, who helped it to survive in difficult times. And there, in gold, enter the names of S.P. Invincible, V.P. Gryazev, A.G. Shipunov and many other designers who, contrary to the vile policy of the Gorbachev-Yeltsins, did everything they could to Russia to remain a Great Power.

    Yes sir!
  18. 0
    8 March 2015 05: 30
    In the current confrontation between Russia and the West, I want only one thing - better, more and sooner.
  19. 0
    8 March 2015 15: 08
    The complex is good. Particularly impressive is its target designation by terrain photography and scanning. We wish we had more such complexes. And to all the distant frontiers. "We'll throw our hats"
  20. John Silver
    0
    8 March 2015 16: 09
    The article surprised me. There were medium-range strategic missiles - RSD-10 Pioneer, deployed in Belarus and Ukraine, which covered all of Europe. To neutralize them deployed Pershing - operational-tactical missiles with a nuclear warhead. What does the Iskander have to do with it? Yes, despite the fact that their announced appointment is the neutralization of the European missile defense. Here the appointment of the Pershinges and Iskanders is probably similar, although the Iskanders are smaller and the warhead there is ordinary.

    Another thing is that the effectiveness of attempts to neutralize missile defense through the use of ballistic missiles in itself raises questions. I understand that maybe THAAD is not so good ... nevertheless, missile defense batteries can be deployed in Europe quite quickly and in fairly large quantities. I think that in fact the solution is in the new supersonic long-range cruise missiles. The Americans announced that such a missile was being developed in Russia when they accused Russia of violating the treaty on medium-range missiles. And Iskander-M is yesterday, as a replacement for the -y point will come off.
  21. +1
    8 March 2015 18: 22
    "armed with two solid-propellant missiles, which deliver warheads to a distance of 500 km
    weighing up to 480 kg each. Missiles can be equipped with high-explosive, penetrating, high-explosive incendiary,
    cluster, cumulative, volumetric detonating and even nuclear warheads. "////

    The key word here is "and even nuclear warheads."
    This is what Europeans are afraid of (absolutely right!). And ONLY this.

    A conventional 480 kg warhead is the equivalent of a conventional half-ton air bomb (which all are now equipped with
    accurate guidance). The explosion of such a head cannot have any significance. Israel brought down
    such bombs skyscrapers in Gaza and Lebanon, under which the headquarters of the militants nested. The house was falling like a mowing.
    But this did not produce any special military effect.
    In order to have an effect, it is necessary to put 10 Iskanders in a row and slaughter an enemy continuously with them.
    Now calculate how much it will cost (how much does one rocket cost?).

    So Iskander is an additional means of NUCLEAR deterrence.
    1. 0
      9 March 2015 13: 17
      Iskander is not for these purposes, it is for the destruction of factories, airfields, headquarters, and personnel (cluster modification, 54 cluster supply reserves (count on the enemy simultaneously flies 54 F1 grenades)). One warhead and no tank or aircraft plant, replenishment of military equipment is nowhere and no where.
      1. 0
        10 March 2015 17: 09
        "54 cluster ammunition supplies (count on the enemy from above 54 F1 grenades simultaneously)" ////

        You exaggerate the effectiveness of cluster weapons. Israel used rockets with
        Cluster warheads in Lebanon - almost zero efficiency.
        The same thing before - the Americans in Kosovo.
        Cassettes are now widely discarded in favor of precision landmines.
        Only a mass of people in an open area can be hooked with a cluster warhead
        (for example, a direct hit in the army camp).
        Such a weapon will not do any harm to any plant or important object.
        For the destruction of objects need special concrete high-explosive bombs.
        1. 0
          12 March 2015 22: 25
          Naturally, no one would use cluster munitions for factories, there are high-explosive warheads on Iskander. Concrete-piercing why, did you see the factory workshops ?, the concrete there usually only has ceilings, an ordinary high-explosive warhead will easily penetrate the roof and destroy the workshop.
  22. ABM
    ABM
    0
    8 March 2015 21: 47
    Quote: voyaka uh
    "armed with two solid-propellant missiles, which deliver warheads to a distance of 500 km
    weighing up to 480 kg each. Missiles can be equipped with high-explosive, penetrating, high-explosive incendiary,
    cluster, cumulative, volumetric detonating and even nuclear warheads. "////

    The key word here is "and even nuclear warheads."
    This is what Europeans are afraid of (absolutely right!). And ONLY this.

    A conventional 480 kg warhead is the equivalent of a conventional half-ton air bomb (which all are now equipped with
    accurate guidance). The explosion of such a head cannot have any significance. Israel brought down
    such bombs skyscrapers in Gaza and Lebanon, under which the headquarters of the militants nested. The house was falling like a mowing.
    But this did not produce any special military effect.
    In order to have an effect, it is necessary to put 10 Iskanders in a row and slaughter an enemy continuously with them.
    Now calculate how much it will cost (how much does one rocket cost?).

    So Iskander is an additional means of NUCLEAR deterrence.



    absolutely right! and accurate hits in nuclear power units
  23. 0
    9 March 2015 17: 22
    I hope, if necessary, missiles can be installed on Iskander-m and with a greater radius of action than 500 km. But only if necessary ...))
  24. 0
    9 March 2015 20: 02
    Iskander both realistically and virtually scared foreign politicians and warriors. And that is -GUT! am
  25. 1z1961gjgjd
    0
    11 March 2015 23: 01
    10 of these complexes, when launched from the Kursk region, would have long ceased the Civil War in Ukraine.
    It remains to wait for the banderlogs to officially declare war on the Russian Federation in order to once and for all repel the thirst for revenge from the fascist henchmen.
  26. 0
    23 June 2015 21: 39
    Quote: professor
    In the article there are blunders above the roof. After reading "Each vehicle is completely autonomous and can receive target designation even from photographs." The complex is not dependent on reconnaissance satellites or aviation. Target designation can be obtained not only from them, but also from a special combined-arms reconnaissance vehicle, a soldier of an artillery fire spotter or from a photograph of the area, which will enter the onboard computer directly at the combat position through a scanner "did not read further. Immediately I imagined how a fighter photographs the terrain in profile with a soap dish from a height of 1.7 meters, and a miracle algorithm converts this image into a picture from the top from a height of a couple of thousand meters. Nobel laureates nervously smoke on the sidelines ...

    I'm embarrassed to ask ... but have no one heard about drones? Well, the very ones with which the notorious "special combined-arms reconnaissance vehicles" are armed and which "draw" those very photographs of the area? no, no, I'm nothing, I'm just asking ... :)))
    but actually ... reading such comments ... the question involuntarily arises - why were they so outraged in the west when they found out that they would have another "answer" to their "placement" at their side - if our "answers" are so crazy? :))