Palestinian mine

17
Palestinian mine Palestine, which is already one of the “hot spots” of the planet, can become the “bundle of brushwood” that will lead to the complete destabilization of the Middle East. The Palestinian National Authority (PNA) intends to seek recognition of independence, despite opposition from Israel and the United States.

Jerusalem, which is particularly actively supported in Washington, considers the claims of the PNA President Mahmoud Abbas to be “completely unfounded” and contrary to earlier UN agreements and resolutions.

In turn, the leadership of Palestine argues that the creation of a separate Arab state in Palestinian territory (including that occupied by Israel) is an integral part of international agreements and the time has come to put these plans into action. Palestinian Arabs were especially inspired by recent events in the Middle East and North Africa. In their desire for independence, Palestinian Arabs are supported by dozens of states, according to Abbas, over 150 countries. Palestine’s aspirations for independence are favorably voiced by leaders of such regional powers as Iran and Turkey.

But the main problem is that the United States has the right of veto in the UN Security Council, and Israel has all the capabilities to prevent the formation of a Palestinian state.

Jerusalem indicates a number of reasons why it is too early to talk about the creation of a Palestinian state. Thus, the West Bank and Gaza Strip are two separate territories (enclave), which are divided by the territory of the Jewish state. The Gaza Strip is controlled by supporters of the party and the Hamas movement (“Islamic Movement of Resistance”), this organization is recognized in a number of states as terrorist. The West Bank is controlled by Fatah ("Movement for the National Liberation of Palestine"). Both organizations are in a state of armed conflict between themselves. Each enclave has its own government. There are no authorities that would control the entire territory of Palestine.

Palestine is financially dependent on sponsors. Its annual budget in 3,7 billion dollars almost entirely consists of donations. Palestine is sponsored by Arab states, the USA, Japan and other countries. The United States threatens to suspend funding if Abbas insists, and this is a substantial amount - 400 million dollars. True, the Arab countries have already announced replenishment of damage - Saudi Arabia allocates an additional 200 million dollars, Kuwait - 50 million, etc.

In addition, Jerusalem does not want the emergence of a new neighbor-state hostile to it. The Palestinian Authority does not recognize Israel’s right to exist. Israel insists on the aggressiveness of the Palestinians, their organizations, who regularly bombard the territory of the Jewish state, are committing terrorist acts. The exact borders of the new state are not specified anywhere, so no one can give Israel security guarantees.

In turn, representatives of Arab states (now Turkey supports them) point to the fact that it is the Jewish state that is the main source of tension in the Middle East region. Israel has launched a series of wars against its Arab neighbors. And the injustice of Palestine only "creates additional aggressive aspirations of the Zionists."

As a result, the world community faces a problem that is almost impossible to solve with peace negotiations. If a Palestinian state is created, Israel will be “offended” if the PNA bid is denied, the threat of a new Palestine explosion will increase. A vicious circle that could lead to a new Arab-Israeli war.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mitrich
    0
    22 September 2011 09: 08
    How does the PNA not recognize the existence of the State of Israel? Who else did Rabin (if I am not mistaken) and Arafat shake hands with and hug with under Clinton? This issue is no longer on the agenda - here the Jews are cunning. Israel does not recognize this Hamas in Gaza.
    In general, I have long had a strong feeling that the Israeli-Palestinian peace is not needed by either one or the other. Some are victims of Palestinian terror in the eyes of the United States and the EU, others are victims in the eyes of the Arab world, especially the rich countries of the Persian Gulf and Turkey. And so, and so how the victims of "aggression" - various financial preferences or direct material assistance from sponsors (Jews, we must give them their due, use it more wisely than the Palestinians). Both those and those in rare moments of calm provoke each other into conflict.
    Peacekeeping in Palestine, whoever did not engage in it, wasted nothing, so I think that the question of establishing an independent Palestinian state will not be positively resolved at the UN General Assembly this week.
  2. +1
    22 September 2011 11: 40
    Yes, the question will be raised at the UN, the staff members are making a commitment, the Muslims are screaming that the United States supports the Jews, and the "pioneer fire" is so flaming - that it will be able to pull on the 3rd world ... God forbid, of course ... Russia then should fence off and not get in anywhere
  3. +2
    22 September 2011 11: 40
    here it is necessary to maintain a cold calculation, the Palestinians as a whole are uneducated and gray people, but this does not give Israel the right to occupy part of Palestine.
  4. 0
    22 September 2011 13: 56
    Well, I talked with Setra on Skype, she lives in Israel (she’s not a Jew, I’ll say right away, ours is what they say from Khabarovsk), so she says according to the movement of troops that it’s brewing and they all know it, the troops are ready anytime she speaks give the lyuley to the Arabs, and she told me that there will never be peace in the Arab quarters for them as a Geto, and both the Hebrews and the Arabs are just waiting for a tuck to warm their hands, believe me, how is there someone who’s mother war
  5. -2
    22 September 2011 15: 51
    "We can forgive the Arabs for killing our children. But we cannot forgive them for making us kill their children. Only then will we reach peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us." Golda Meir.
    There is nothing to add.
    1. mitrich
      0
      22 September 2011 16: 23
      Professor,
      she did not cry at these words? Interestingly, if you count the children killed on either side since 1949, in whose favor will the bill be? In my opinion, the answer is obvious.
      So this is nothing more than beautiful rhetoric for the Haaretz newspaper.
      1. -2
        22 September 2011 17: 00
        Mitrich, we don’t seem to touch each other?

        PS
        http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%

        D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B5_%C2%AB%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BB%D

        1%8C%D1%84%D0%B8%C2%BB

        http://www.dolfi.ru/

        http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%B2_%D0%BF%

        D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%98%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B0%D

        1% 80_ (2011)
        1. mitrich
          0
          22 September 2011 18: 15
          Professor,
          re-read your comment. There was NOT a word about you personally, there were NO requests to throw a link about whether there was a similar phrase in reality smile finally, your personal rating was also NOT spoiled by me. I only "touched" the ex-prime minister of Israel. If G. Meir is your grandmother, then of course I am ready to apologize.
          I hope that our gentlemen’s agreement did not include the fact that I should ignore the articles under which you left your comment?
          1. -1
            22 September 2011 18: 37
            My rating interests me a little - not at that age.
            Golda Meir is not my relative, but I respect her anyway. At least for the fact that under her "female" leadership, many dorks got their asses kicked. (Margaret Thatcher, by the way, also deserves respect.)

            Now regarding your comment. The death of a child is a tragedy. The difference between the Israelis and the Arabs is such that when the death of an Arab child, the Israeli military prosecutor opens a case and the perpetrators appear in court, and when the death of an Israeli child, they distribute sweets on an Arab street.
            Regarding the numbers, in Israel all of their victims are counted and not nameless. After all, you yourself cited the example of Corporal Shalit. Arabs do not consider their own. Therefore, you can only find data on Israeli victims. In Gaza, before the bombing during Operation Cast Lead from Israeli aircraft (he himself saw a report on Al Jazeera), leaflets were scattered asking to free the area.
            IHMO Israelis died more.
            1. mitrich
              0
              22 September 2011 18: 54
              Professor,
              I don’t have statistics on hand, it’s true, but I will allow myself to say that more airborne deaths occur during airborne bombardment (bombing and assault) attacks than during terrorist attacks.
              But not the point, colleague. I have a question for you in the following order, especially since you have been to Israel and are familiar with this country:
              Do you think that the only obstacle to the creation of a Palestinian state is Palestinian extremism and terrorism, and that in its absence Israel will be with both hands "for" the creation of an independent Palestine?
              And more:
              Is Israel, in your opinion, an aggressive or injured party regarding the conflict with the Palestinians?
              1. -1
                22 September 2011 20: 08
                The attacks on the Arab settlements are carried out not by carpet bombing, but by extremely high-precision weapons. I’ll find a video - I’ll post about how arbs climb onto the roofs of houses in Gaza because they know that when they see their rockets they will be taken to the side.

                In my deep conviction, the only obstacle to the creation of a Palestinian state is not the desire of the Palestinians themselves to create it. I understand that sounds strange, but I can clarify. In 1948, Jews took advantage of a UN resolution and created a state; Arabs did nothing for their state. OOP was created only in 1964 year. The occupation began in the year 1967. Then there were Oslo agreements (Arafat came from Tunisia and brought a couple of wanted terrorists in the trunk of his car in violation of the agreements). In 2000, Arafat announced his intention to proclaim a state, but as you know, this did not happen.
                Palestinians live solely on foreign aid (Israeli aid is not the last place there), they are interesting to the world as long as there is an occupation. Who will remember them when they become a country? Who cares about millions of victims every year in Africa? There is no industry in the West Bank, except for the one built by Israel and in Gaza. They get electricity, water and fuel for free from Israel. The number of civil servants per capita is one of the largest in the world. Help cut however. The second intifada began by order of Arafat, not because Sharon climbed the Temple Mount, he was there before. And it began because the European Union sent a commission to audit the spending of European aid. The intifada began and all the money was written off to Israeli aggression. By the way, the personal fortune of Rais itself is estimated at billions of dollars, although there is no oil in Palestine, as you know.
                Do you know what currency is used in Palestine? Right, shekels of the damned invaders. So do not worry about inflation. Palestinians already 100 times could announce the creation of the state, but they always find a reason not to. There is an UNRA organization under the UN - solely to assist the Palestinians. Another fact: aid was allocated to Palestine more than to post-war Europe according to the Marshall plan.
                Where the concrete dividing wall passed through Arab villages, it was the Palestinian side that was emptied. Every year, thousands of requests for "family rebuilding" are filed with the Israeli Interior Ministry, not the Palestinian one.
                You will not believe it, but most Israelis and the population and politicians are in favor of creating a Palestinian state. Disagreement on the issue of borders and security.

                Israel is hardly an injured party: they created a prosperous state in an unfriendly environment. Science and industry are at a high level, as is the standard of living. The Palestinians did not miss a single opportunity to miss the opportunity. IHMO Palestinian injured party.

                About Israel's aggressiveness. News when the injured party is Israel in the world media does not pass - not interesting, but the Palestinian side is covered in full. Therefore, it seems that Israel is only attacking. In this conflict, everything is already so confused that it is difficult (if not impossible) to figure out who first started. I can add that if Israel set out to get rid of the Palestinians, it did so long ago and not necessarily by military means. For example, how the Azerbaijanis evicted the Armenians from the Nankhichivan region without violence. But Israel is not white and fluffy either.
                1. mitrich
                  0
                  22 September 2011 20: 23
                  Professor,
                  Toda slave for clarification. If you find a video, it will be interesting to see.
                  1. -2
                    23 September 2011 11: 06
                    Saudis toss Palestinians some money
                    http://mignews.com/news/economics/world/200911_31914_51063.html
                    http://english.wafa.ps/index.php?action=detail&id=17416
  6. oper66
    +3
    22 September 2011 16: 02
    Mustafa complains to the Farid: I do not like the Hebrew because, my neighbor, Abram is sleeping with my wife, Yes, this is bad, the Farid agrees. But I am abram, I also sleep with his wife. so you’ve grown up. No, says Mustafa: I am offended, I make Jews to him, and he tells me Arabs. winked
  7. 0
    22 September 2011 17: 58
    Let the UN step on its own rake, let it correct its resolution on the state of "Israel". Didn't they accept it, that they did not know that they had planted a smoldering bomb in the Middle East? I perfectly understand and sympathize with all the Arabs. No one would have liked it when they were forcibly moved on his historical land and said that now it is "his" land. Moreover, it is not based on anything (the Old Testament or the Bible is not a proof). I was always curious to know what happened before the birth of Christ, where was the land of Israel? We know Rome, we know Egypt, we know China, we know a lot of things, but damn it about Israel only from these books ?! Hmm! And where is the story then? Disorder! Move your sideways away!
  8. Ruslank
    +1
    23 September 2011 20: 30
    W.Sancho I am surprised at your ignorance if the Old Testament, according to which half of the world and Russia live, is not your authority, but since you heard the ancient for Rome and Egypt, you can look through ancient Roman history as a primer. You can also * Jewish war * or * Jewish antiquities *. Good luck
  9. Ruslank
    +1
    23 September 2011 20: 40
    One-sidedness of Mitrich can only be pitied, perhaps there are reasons for this kind of love for one and hatred for others, but objectivity is zero. The knowledge of the Dear Professor can only be envied, there are simply no words! Considerations for the honor of having such a person in friends, I have been watching you for a long time and amazed at your composure and objectivity! With spark.Ruslank /

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"