UAE presented the armored personnel carrier EDT Enigma AMFV

38
22 February in Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) launched the international exhibition of weapons and military equipment IDEX-2015. This event is attended by many enterprises from the UAE and foreign countries. Several exhibition stands are occupied by the exposition of companies and organizations of the defense industry of the UAE. Perhaps the most interesting exhibit of UAE stands is the prototype of the promising armored personnel carrier EDT Enigma AMFV.

UAE presented the armored personnel carrier EDT Enigma AMFV


Shortly before the exhibition began, Emirated Defense Technology (EDT) completed the assembly of the first prototype of the advanced Enigma AMFV armored vehicle (Armored Modular Fighting Vehicle - “Armored Modular Fighting Vehicle”). The first prototype is made in the configuration of an armored personnel carrier with a Russian-made combat module. However, the Enigma chassis can also be used to create techniques of other classes. Known about the work on the creation of self-propelled anti-aircraft installation and self-propelled guns with a caliber 155 mm. All these projects, apparently, are still at the design stage, which is why so far only one armored personnel carrier has been built, which will have to undergo a complex of necessary tests.

The project Enigma AMFV was originally called Nimr 8x8 and was positioned as a new car of the same name family: UAE several years ago launched the production of Nimr armored vehicles with the wheel formula 4x4. Nevertheless, over time it was decided to rename the project, probably due to the most serious differences from the existing armored car. At the moment, the new armored vehicle is called Enigma. This armored personnel carrier and other vehicles at its base will be further offered to the UAE armed forces. How successful this development will be is too early to say.

The appearance of the Enigma AMFV shown by the BTR suggests that EDT engineers, when developing this car, took into account foreign projects of similar armored vehicles. For this reason, the new "Enigma" in appearance and layout of the case resembles a mass of foreign technology. However, there are some characteristic features. First of all it is necessary to note the big height of the car. It seems that the roof of the hull is located at a height of at least 2,5 m above the ground.



The layout of the housing units is a classic for modern technology of this class. In the front of the hull are some units, behind which are the office of management with the workplace of the driver (on the left side) and the engine compartment (on the right). Immediately behind them is the habitable volume, given under the combat and amphibious branch. On the roof of the tower there is a shoulder strap on which a suitable combat module can be installed. The aft part of the hull, depending on the modification, is given for the placement of the landing force or the necessary aggregates / loads.

The armored body of the EDT Enigma AMFV has the usual "faceted" shape formed by several straight sheets. The front part is assembled from several inclined sheets, and the upper frontal part has a rather complex shape associated with the placement of some units inside the case. The roof and sides are even, but the transition between them is made in the form of a small oblong inclined sheet. Ballistic protection level unknown. Probably, the Enigma can protect the crew from rifle bullets. weapons, including large-caliber. Characteristic fasteners on the surface of the housing of the sample shown may indicate the presence of additional mounted protection modules. To protect against explosive devices, the bottom of the case has a special V-shape, designed to divert the shock wave to the side of the case.

The EDT Enigma AMFV BTR was heavy enough. Its combat weight is declared at 28 tons. To ensure high performance with this weight, an engine of adequate power is required. The machine is equipped with a Caterpillar C13 diesel engine with an 711 horsepower, coupled with an automatic transmission manufactured by the same company. In the eight-wheel chassis, an independent arm suspension with shock absorbers is used. These units are developed by the Irish company Timoney Technology. A curious feature of the suspension is its architecture, based on the use of many relatively small elements. Due to this, it is claimed that repair is significantly simplified in case of damage, for example, after an explosion at an explosive device. To overcome the water obstacles are provided jet propulsion. Two such units are located in the rear part of the hull, above the rear wheels.

The new UAE armored personnel carrier has a fairly large size, which made it possible to equip it with relatively powerful weapons. The prototype presented at the IDEX-2015 exhibition received a Russian-made Bakhcha combat module, borrowed from the BMP-3 infantry fighting vehicle. The latter is actively used by the UAE armed forces, because of which the creation of an armored personnel carrier with “Bakhchoy” can be a reasonable and expedient step. Thus, the prototype machine carries an 2А70 caliber gun 100 mm, 30-mm automatic gun 2А72 and a PCT machine gun of the 7,62 mm caliber. The Enigma armored personnel carrier in this configuration will be able to support infantry with the help of various types of projectiles, guided missiles and machine-gun fire.

Despite the use of a sufficiently large combat module, in the body of the Enigma AMFV BTR there is still room for a landing of eight people. In the stern of the hull there are eight seats installed along the sides. The fighters must get into the car and leave it through a lowered ramp in the rear hull sheet. Raising and lowering the ramp is proposed to implement using hydraulic cylinders. In case of damage to the hydraulic system, a manually openable door is provided in the ramp.

Own crew of an armored personnel carrier in the configuration presented at the exhibition consists of three people. The driver is in front of the hull and has its own sunroof, equipped with viewing devices. Places of the commander and the operator-gunner are located in the double tower. To monitor the situation and control weapons, the commander and the gunner can use a variety of equipment. In the roof of the tower there are two hatches.



The project name reflects the modularity of the new armored vehicle. Indeed, the specialists of EDT and related organizations are currently working on the creation of new projects of armored vehicles based on the Enigma chassis, differing from each other in the combat modules used. As follows from the available information, the most active cooperation is with Russian defense enterprises. Thus, the exhibition prototype received the Bakhcha combat module, and in the future another unit of a similar purpose, created in Russia, can be installed on the Enigma AMFV chassis.

A few days before the start of the IDEX-2015 exhibition, the Russian corporation Uralvagonzavod spoke about its plans for cooperation with foreign colleagues. Among other things, it is planned to implement a joint project with the Emirate company, the essence of which is to install the new AU-220М combat module on the Enigma chassis. The new Russian combat module is equipped with an 57-mm automatic cannon, which, according to its creators, should significantly increase the firepower of armored vehicles. The prototype of the AU-220M module, like the prototype Enigma, was demonstrated at an exhibition in Abu Dhabi.

In the near future, work on the creation of a self-propelled artillery installation based on the Enigma AMFV chassis should be completed. This machine should receive a new combat module, equipped with a light howitzer M777 caliber 155 mm. Such a machine will be able to hit targets at ranges up to 25-30 km. In the case of guided missiles, the effective firing range will be able to reach 40 km with high precision hits.

In the future, the customer will be able to purchase not only BTR and SAU, but also ZSU based on the Enigma AMFV chassis. Such a modification of the car will be equipped with a Skyranger combat module developed by Rheinmetall Air Defense (formerly Oerlikon Contraves). This combat module is a turret with an automatic gun caliber 35 mm. A set of surveillance equipment, fire control system and other equipment, according to the manufacturer, provide effective destruction of targets at distances up to 4 km.

As the main customer of combat vehicles of the EDT Enigma AMFV family are considered the UAE armed forces. They may be interested in both armored personnel carriers and other vehicles based on a common chassis. First of all, such equipment can be supplied to ground forces, although the ability to overcome water obstacles by swimming can open the way to the marines. In the future, deliveries to third-country armies are possible.

Nevertheless, it is too early to talk about supplies. At the moment there is only one instance of a promising vehicle in the configuration of an armored personnel carrier. He just has to go to the test, the results of which potential customers will be able to determine whether they need such a technique. The deadlines for completing the tests and the possible appearance of a contract for the supply of armored vehicles of the Enigma AMFV family are understandably unknown. Perhaps the first news on this account will appear as soon as possible.


On the materials of the sites:
http://janes.com/
http://emiratesdefense.com/
http://sdarabia.com/
http://wam.ae/
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    26 February 2015 06: 59
    Thanks for the review. Article plus, of course.
    I just don’t understand - even placing 150mm on a wheeled chassis is a whole problem, but where to give the landing?
    And is it necessary to try to push such a shooter into the armored personnel carrier?
    1. +5
      26 February 2015 07: 56
      Quote: Bugor
      Thanks for the review. Article plus, of course.
      I just don’t understand - even placing 150mm on a wheeled chassis is a whole problem, but where to give the landing?
      And is it necessary to try to push such a shooter into the armored personnel carrier?

      Apparently, we are talking about self-propelled guns. The platform is modular. Based on it, it is possible to produce both armored personnel carriers and self-propelled guns, mortars or artillery.
    2. +2
      26 February 2015 08: 17
      An interesting integration of the combat module turned out.
      1. +1
        26 February 2015 09: 33
        even having modern armored personnel carriers (military police) armed with modern armored personnel carriers, the Arabs are trying to do "their own, or rather localize production in the UAE, the same way is asked for the military industry of Turkey ...
        Now they are intensely modernizing their defense industry, Algeria and Jordan ....

        in Russia, unfortunately there is nothing to brag about in this direction, there is no wheeled armored personnel carrier 8x8, and when it will not be known ....

        Turkey, wheeled armored vehicles:
        Arma, Ejder, Pars 4x4
        _______________________
        Arma 6x6 - Otokar
        Ejder 6x6 - Nurol
        Pars 6x6 - FNSS
        ________________________
        Arma 8x8 - Otokar
        Pars 8x8 - FNSS
        AV8 8x8 - FNSS / DEFTECH Ortak Üretimi
        we are close, nothing like that is not !!!!

        PARS 4x4 - FNSS GPV 4x4
  2. +1
    26 February 2015 07: 22
    I wonder if there are armored personnel carriers from purely Arabian components?
    1. +6
      26 February 2015 08: 24
      Quote: Basarev
      I wonder if there are armored personnel carriers from purely Arabian components?

      Of course have! Called a camel.
  3. +1
    26 February 2015 08: 55
    A little off topic .... Inspired, so to speak ... So, the longer I look at "Bakhchu", the more clearly I understand - it must be made uninhabited. In order to preserve epic firepower, isolate the ammo from the crew and (especially) the landing ...
    But in general, the carcassabra is entertaining - wonderful: 8 axles - good cross-country ability, the ability to swim with a weight of 30 tons (there are doubts about seaworthiness) - all that, in the opinion of many, the Typhoon lacks .... mine protection lead
    1. +1
      26 February 2015 10: 01
      Quote: tchoni
      ..Here, the longer I look at "Bakhchu", the more clearly I understand - it must be made uninhabited

      if, ours, managed to make such a DBM, would be one of the best BM in the world (for wheeled infantry fighting vehicles) !!!
      but judging by open sources, the bet will be made on the DBM with the modernized C-60,57 mm gun, but it’s a pity ....
      1. +2
        26 February 2015 11: 07
        Quote: cosmos111
        DBM with a modernized S-60,57 mm cannon, which is a pity ....

        So I'm sorry ... Because the caliber may be good, but an attempt to make it "universal" while maintaining anti-tank capabilities is, in my opinion, a dead-end path ...
    2. +2
      26 February 2015 10: 14
      Quote: tchoni
      But in general, the carcaseabra is entertaining - wonderful: 8 axles - good cross-country ability, the ability to swim with a weight of 30 tons (there are doubts about seaworthiness) - all that, in the opinion of many, the Typhoon lacks.


      "Typhoon" is not an armored personnel carrier or an infantry fighting vehicle, but an MRAP.
      1. +2
        26 February 2015 11: 11
        Quote: IS-80
        "Typhoon" is not an armored personnel carrier or an infantry fighting vehicle, but an MRAP.

        Maybe MRAP .... My personal opinion is that it is only BMP and armored personnel carriers that should be separated (MRA by definition of armored personnel carriers, and, if you follow elementary logic, armored personnel carriers should be MRAs) By and large, amphibious abilities are needed only by marines, and patency at the tank level is needed only machines protected like tanks .... But the majority opinion goes against my personal ...
        1. +2
          26 February 2015 11: 45
          Quote: tchoni
          But the majority opinion is contrary to my personal ...

          which majority what ??

          I’ll add, MRI is a specialized (((relatively cheap))) armored personnel carrier, for asymmetric (counterguerrilla warfare, where IEDs are massively used ... mostly))))
          although the MRAPs, the South African army, also used for the war (local - "classical" with Angola ...
          a lot depends on the tactics of using armored vehicles .....
          1. +1
            26 February 2015 12: 03
            Quote: cosmos111
            which majority

            Ah, open any article about a typhoon or a non-floating armored personnel carrier - every second comment - SHOULD SWIM ....
        2. avt
          +1
          26 February 2015 11: 50
          Quote: tchoni
          Maybe MRAP .... My personal opinion is that it is only BMP and armored personnel carriers that should be separated (MRAP, by the definition of armored personnel carriers, and, if we follow elementary logic, armored personnel carriers should be MIRAPs)

          good I’ve been talking about this for a long time - an armored personnel carrier from the front edge should be removed with the appearance of an infantry fighting vehicle.
          Quote: tchoni
          By and large, only amphibians need amphibious abilities,

          No. Strongly disagree! Well, just look at the map, or remember the experience of the last war, when there was a catastrophic lack of amphibious equipment for the assault units of the first throw and its amer was supplied. The troops need a continuation machine, three-ruble notes - BMD-4M.
          1. +2
            26 February 2015 12: 02
            Quote: avt
            I’ve been talking about this for a long time - an armored personnel carrier from the front edge should be removed with the appearance of an infantry fighting vehicle.

            And add: Which should be armored at the tank level ....
            Quote: avt
            or remember the experience of the past war
            The Wehrmacht did not have a single amphibious tank — it reached Moscow. River crossing is a special task, solved with the active participation of engineering departments. Here in them - please amphibians should be represented ... In most cases, crossing is prevented not so much by the water barrier itself, but by the relief of its banks ...
            1. +2
              26 February 2015 19: 11
              creepy nonsense! in 41, the Germans had in operation a proven set of devices for pz III, which made it ruling, and on June 22, such tanks forced rivers on the USSR border.
              1. +1
                27 February 2015 09: 19
                Quote: yehat
                in 41, the Germans had a proven set of devices for pz III in operation,

                Here, in more detail ... pliz ....
                I know that for the T-3 there was a diving kit. And also I know that it was equipped with a certain number of tanks .....
                quote modeler constructor for 1994 article "The third extra"
                At the end of the summer of 1940, 168 tanks of the F, G and H models were converted for movement under water and were to be used when landing on the English coast. The immersion depth was 15 m; fresh air was supplied by a hose 18 m long and 20 cm in diameter. In the spring of 1941, experiments were continued with a 3,5 m pipe - "snorkel". Since the landing in England did not take place, a number of such tanks from the 18th Panzer Division on June 22, 1941 overcame the Western Bug along the bottom.

                As you can see, we are talking about the number of machines sufficient to complete just one motto ... And the use of amphibians can not be called massive ..
          2. 0
            26 February 2015 15: 00
            Quote: avt
            Strongly disagree! Well, just look at the map, or remember the experience of the past war when there was a catastrophic lack of amphibious equipment for assault units

            after the Second World War, not one such operation ((on large-scale river forcing, motorized rifles in combat conditions were not carried out ... as well as military landing in the Airborne Forces, BMD)))) but how many losses, from insufficient protection, ballistic and mine protection, floating BMP-1,2 and BMD 1,2,3 ....
            Quote: avt
            .Nuzhna in the troops is a continuation machine "three-ruble" - BMD-4M.

            are needed to capture advanced bridgeheads and raid operations MILITARY QUICK DEPLOYMENT !!!!
            weapons, unified wheeled and general cargo vehicles, floating, weighing up to 25 tons ....
            as an example SER / FRES, wheeled chassis 6x6,8x8, GS unified by components and assemblies ....

            Quote: tchoni
            The Wehrmacht did not have a single floating tank -

            had, in the form of prototypes and pre-production samples, why did not begin to deploy production You answered ....
            Quote: tchoni
            Forcing rivers is a special task,

            Landwasserschlepper lws
            project of a floating transporter, Landwasserschlepper LWS was developed by 1941 year, on the chassis of a medium tank ...
            The first prototype was completed on 15.5.1942 of the year ...
            machines for overcoming water obstacles pontoon, weight 39 tons and dimensions 9,75x9,45м.
            the test results were positive, but there was no mass production, and the project was canceled.


            17 tons weight
            length is already 8,25 m
            Width 2,80 m
            height 1,50
            Maybach HL120 TRM engine (300k)
            470l fuel in 3 tank
            Maximum speed 45km / h
            consumption route-200 l / 100km of terrain-350 l / 100km
            Armor 14,5 mm



            info from: http: //forum.valka.cz/viewtopic.php/t/17771/start/-1
            1. +1
              26 February 2015 15: 19
              Quote: cosmos111
              MILITARY QUICK DEPLOYMENT !!!!

              RS: quick response / airmobile((only levels, name am )))
            2. +1
              26 February 2015 15: 41
              There is a very good article on this topic. You may have already read it. It was published in the Western Military District for a year and I don't remember the number. It was called "Wehrmacht Amphibious Operations Means".
              Quote: cosmos111
              are needed to capture advanced bridgeheads and raid operations MILITARY QUICK DEPLOYMENT !!!!
              weapons, unified wheeled and general cargo vehicles, floating, weighing up to 25 tons ....
              as an example, SER / FRES, 6x6,8x8 wheeled chassis, GS unified by units and assembly

              Yes. more or less like this. only the maximum weight limit of 25 tons is a bit too much for the Il-76. It is more reasonable to consider a car up to 18 tons. That, by the way, they tried to stick to the Typhoon, depriving it of its main trump card - security ... Although with modular construction this issue is completely solved ... And I'm afraid you won't get away from modularity - because different mobile groups need very different equipment:
              - to scouts - whatever they were making noise, running and climbing everywhere .. they don’t need volumes of the airborne squad, as well as especially epic weapons and armor protection (a wolf feeds its legs and nose). And ideally, it would also fit into a Mi-8 type helicopter.
              - to paratroopers - that would interfere with the plane. She took more people and swag, and she would have protected ..... from what could be in the hands of the infantry ... well, at least to some extent. Plus, if something epic from the armament could be pushed into it.
              - Marines need it to swim or ride under water. By weight and dimensions - they are not so critical. For particularly epic calibers - the same (if that the fleet will support). But the sailors should, in theory, have serious requirements to protect ... But they should go ashore, and there, they might meet some kind of defensive defense ... Marine Corps, of course, it’s almost like the Airborne Forces - it takes arrogance and impudence, but only they are not aircraft speeds.
              1. +1
                26 February 2015 17: 27
                Quote: tchoni
                ... And from modularity, I'm afraid you can’t get anywhere - because different mobile groups need very different equipment:

                I agree with you, a single wheeled chassis with the wheel formula 4х4,6х6,8х8 ((it will already be written off with difficulty in weight dimensions)) and GS ...
                it is desirable that the chassis would be assembled in the form of a designer, supplementing one wheel pair, with a single engine and automatic transmission ...
              2. 0
                26 February 2015 17: 38
                Quote: tchoni
                But the sailors should, in theory, have serious requirements for security.


                and yet, good seaworthiness, speed on water, the possibility of over-horizon landing ...

                quite a difficult task ... but not feasible the Americans built a couple of prototypes abandoned their EFV program ..... but their Chinese, VN1 21-tons,
                VN18 - 26,5 tons, VN16, successfully implemented ...
                1. +1
                  26 February 2015 18: 50
                  Quote: cosmos111
                  EFV programs

                  PS: EFV- expeditionary combat vehicle, a very interesting armored car ...
                  EFV-armored, crew of three Marines and 17 amphibious assault forces ..
                  and video in a subject
    3. 0
      6 March 2015 05: 22
      The existing combat module, in principle, can be made uninhabited, but there is no special meaning in such modernization. It would be more advisable to design a new one.
  4. +1
    26 February 2015 08: 57
    Well, in general, it would be nice to write about protection ...
  5. +1
    26 February 2015 10: 50
    The equipment is getting bigger and bigger in size ... Is there a pole for strippers and a jacuzzi there?
    1. +3
      26 February 2015 11: 27
      Quote: The Cat
      The equipment is getting bigger and bigger in size ... Is there a pole for strippers and a jacuzzi there?

      1.comfort, removed, fatigue of the crew and the landing force ((how much time you sit in the hull, with + 50 and -40, without a conveyor and a good stove ????))) after an hour the combat effectiveness of 00000 .....
      2. sufficient height, the airborne squad, is needed so that, if a BM is detonated, not to break the neck ....
      3. Variable clearance and air suspension that is stable on slopes ....

      modern BBM 6x6,8x8, difficult to manufacture and expensive thing .... not all countries can afford to buy and operate it .... only technologically developed countries can establish production .....


      AFV "Desert Chameleon" 6x6:
      selective, all-wheel drive
      Caterpillar engine, 600 l. from.
      Automatic 6-speed, Caterpillar
      independent active suspension
      auxiliary power unit (APU) HVAC
      left or right steering wheel
      2 side doors / 1 large ramp, etc ...
      1. +1
        27 February 2015 16: 31
        Comfort, air conditioning, massage table ... It's all good ... But everything seems to be getting ready for the third world ... And in it, the Soviet concept of simple and inconspicuous equipment, in my opinion, will be more successful.
    2. +2
      26 February 2015 14: 28
      Streit Group Matador 8x8 APC
      1. 0
        26 February 2015 15: 23
        Quote: Spade
        Streit Group Matador 8x8 APC

        nice picgood thank...

        An armored personnel carrier from the Streit Group, seen only with the 6x6 wheel formula ..... well done, what can I say, progress on the face .....
        where infa, if not secret ???

        YES, it seems that the Streit Group ((or a similar commercial company))) has developed, for the UAE, BBM EDT Enigma AMFV, we will wait for detailed information ....
        1. 0
          26 February 2015 21: 03
          Matador 8x8 by Streit Group
          TTH:
          Volvo D12D diesel, 420 hp, 6 in-line turbocharged cylinders
          Volvo VT1906PT transmission (6 automatic transmission speed)
          dimensions: length 8,930 m |, width 2,810 m, height 2,714 m
          crew + landing-2 + 10 + 2
          Booking STANAG 4569 Level 4
          and a couple of photos of the pipelac ....


          taken from: http: //otvaga2004.mybb.ru/viewtopic.php? id = 1016 & p = 18
  6. +2
    26 February 2015 11: 51
    I don’t know how anyone, but for me this is our armored personnel carrier (joint with the French) "Atom".
    Are these projects related to the case. And isn't "Enigma" a continuation of "Atom", an attempt to bypass sanctions and use the existing groundwork?
    1. +2
      26 February 2015 13: 30
      Is-is ... still as is
      1. +1
        26 February 2015 21: 14
        on the pass Yes more pictures from the exhibition pepelats-BTR EDT Enigma AMFV ...


  7. 0
    26 February 2015 21: 56
    And what kind of reaction would be interesting if suddenly this machine is among those deliveries under contracts that Potroshenko allegedly concluded while in Abu Dhabi?
    1. 0
      26 February 2015 22: 42
      Quote: Radikal
      And how interesting the reaction will be

      the reaction will be purely positive lol the militias will wring out, they will ride comfortably ...
      but seriously, it’s more likely that the BTR Streit Group Matador 8x8 APC will be more likely, this company is already supplying armored vehicles to Ruin ...
  8. +1
    27 February 2015 21: 53
    Quote: Radikal
    And what kind of reaction would be interesting, if suddenly this machine is among those deliveries under contracts that Potroshenko allegedly concluded

    This RPG will need to ask smile
  9. 0
    28 February 2015 16: 05
    Everyone makes the bronics !!!!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"