Israel’s missile defense missile tests fail

83
Israel’s missile defense missile tests failThe Ministry of Defense of Israel has prepared these days a report on the development of the country's missile defense system last year. From the report, one can get, in particular, truthful information about the tests of the Hetz-2 and Hetz-3 missile defense systems, which were conducted in September and December of the 2014, respectively.

According to the publication of the portal Ynet, the management of the Wall in the Ministry of Defense, which is responsible for missile defense systems, for the first time acknowledged in this report that the tests of Hetz 2 in September were unsuccessful. At one time, the Russian media were the first to report the failed tests of the Israeli Hez-2 rocket, and Israeli official sources, in turn, called these reports "inaccurate."

Initially, the leadership of the Ministry of Defense did not have information about whether the interceptor hit the target. After a thorough investigation of this issue, it became clear that the interceptor flew past the target, “missing” a very short distance. It took many weeks to find the error that has crept into the calculations, but now, according to the report, it has been fixed.

Testing "Hetz-3" in December also failed, but in other circumstances. Then, the Defense Ministry reported that an interceptor missile was decided not to be released at all, since the system could not track the target with sufficient accuracy. The new report states that the target was tracked in accordance with the plan, the data was transferred to the missile control center, but the launch of the interceptor was canceled due to "security concerns."

Despite these setbacks, another element of Israel’s multi-level antimissile defense, the Magic Wand project, went through a number of important stages on its way to commissioning. In the foreseeable future, this system will pass a series of tests that will show its readiness for a possible confrontation with Hezbollah. According to the current plan, the Magic Wand will go into service with the Israeli army in 2016.

Also reported on the new achievements in the framework of the project "Iron Dome": an increase in the range of reflected threats compared with the design capacity. Also in full swing is the preparation for the commissioning of the 10 additional batteries of the Iron Dome.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    25 February 2015 06: 59
    The wizard Suleiman, all honestly without cheating ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      25 February 2015 07: 03
      ... The missiles were hit ... "what do you call the boat ...", this statement continues to be relevant
      1. +5
        25 February 2015 07: 31
        Something I do not observe the Professor with his comments, that this is all fiction and this is done from the point of view of misinformation and, in general, the Israeli technique of Supere duper
        But the Moscow system is needed to intercept from 4 to 6 missiles to defeat 1 ballistic targets
        So I read that specialists say that in order to hit a warhead, it needs to be fired at least twice exactly when it hits the target
        A hit-to-kil mode is difficult to implement
        1. +1
          25 February 2015 07: 39
          Quote: insafufa
          Something I do not observe the Professor with his comments, that this is all fiction and this is done from the point of view of misinformation and, in general, the Israeli technique of Supere duper

          Technology failures happen. Even Kalashnikov is wedging not to mention such complex systems as missile defense.

          Quote: insafufa
          A hit-to-kil mode is difficult to implement

          He asked a question and answered himself ... laughing
          1. +4
            25 February 2015 07: 51
            Oh cunning wink
            Judging by the material in the article, these are not isolated "jams", but systematic errors.
            By the way, I do not doubt that they will be eliminated.
            If such a complex product as a Mace - flew, then already such a simple missile defense system .. feel
            1. +5
              25 February 2015 07: 58
              Quote: born_in_cssr
              Judging by the material in the article, these are not isolated "jams", but systematic errors.

              Single the failure does not in any way indicate "systematic errors". Maybe you have such data about which we do not know? So share.

              Quote: born_in_cssr
              If such a complex product as a Mace - flew, then already such a simple thing .. (humor with a hint).

              Boulevard did not have to intercept anyone, but just fly ... wink
              1. +6
                25 February 2015 08: 05
                Quote: professor
                A single failure does not indicate "systematic errors" in any way. Maybe you have such data about which we do not know? So share.

                Should I quote the whole article to you? belay Well, no, if you please re-read it yourself. Well, and the meaning to me to you (in broad terms), to prove something? I do not wish to receive the same answer in return as in the article on "inaccurate information" wink
                Quote: professor
                Boulevard did not have to intercept anyone, but just fly ...

                Oh, of course! Missile defense was given by the sons of Israel ... yeah
                Problems inventing bicycles? Everything is simple - took off and shot down? Is not it so?
                1. +3
                  25 February 2015 08: 14
                  Quote: born_in_cssr
                  Should I quote the whole article to you?

                  You carefully read it yourself before. What is not clear ask- enlightenment. hi

                  Quote: born_in_cssr
                  Oh, of course!

                  Tell us about the purpose of the mace?

                  Quote: papas-57
                  Kalash wedges when other samples just fall apart.

                  Yeah, at the dash. Video upload? wink

                  Quote: papas-57
                  And about the Dome last year they said that this is bullshit. The airborne explosions captured were self-destruction of interceptor missiles, and not target destruction.

                  You are 100% right. The bullshit is full. Only one is explained by this !!! killed by 1000 missiles fired in Israel.
                  1. +1
                    25 February 2015 13: 11

                    Quote: professor


                    Quote: papas-57
                    Kalash wedges when other samples just fall apart.

                    Yeah, at the dash. Video upload? wink

                    How about beloved Tsahal Galil
                    Galil externally certainly different, but inside it is the same Kalash

                    There is such a saying, you can foolishly break the apparatus of men laughing
                    1. +2
                      25 February 2015 13: 29
                      Quote: insafufa
                      How about beloved Tsahal Galil
                      Galil externally certainly different, but inside it is the same Kalash

                      There is such a saying, you can foolishly break the apparatus of men

                      But who argues that the hut. And everywhere it is indicated that on the basis of AK. Only Galil withdrawn from service with the IDF
              2. +9
                25 February 2015 08: 07
                Quote: professor
                Maybe you have some data about which

                Quote: born_in_cssr
                If such a complex product as a Mace - flew,

                Quote: Oleg NSK
                ... The missiles have gone off ... "what do you call the boat ...

                Shaw guys, everything is measured by pussy, like whose rocket is longer laughing
                1. +4
                  25 February 2015 08: 11
                  hi The mood is up! Thanks for the comment! good
                2. +6
                  25 February 2015 10: 42
                  Our one-way laughing

                  We’re out there - they even make Poplars out of snow. Omsk prisoners made of snow by February 23. This is what I understand trolling - to stick on all taiga!
                  1. -3
                    25 February 2015 11: 18
                    What do you call a rocket ...
                    Still Potz-2 and Potz-3 would be called laughing
                  2. 0
                    25 February 2015 12: 20
                    By the number of axles, it is closer to the Pioneer ss-20 complex (the model has five, in real life six). And so great done.
                  3. 0
                    25 February 2015 14: 04
                    Our prisoners look further, this is a modification of the Courier!
          2. +2
            25 February 2015 08: 03
            Not so long we wait for the S-500 there, too, they wanted to implement a hit-to-kil
            This is how an interesting thing over the hit-and-kill regime of the USA has been fought together with Japan and Israel for 25 years already so that there are no special results
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. -1
            25 February 2015 08: 05
            '' Technique failures happen. Even Kalashnikov goes crazy, not to mention such complex systems as missile defense. '' Kalash goes crazy when other samples just fall apart. And about the Dome last year they said it was bullshit. The airborne explosions filmed were self-destructing interceptor missiles, not targeting. From the Dome, the Jews only have a name and a non-working weapon system. PR rules.
          5. +1
            25 February 2015 08: 16
            Quote: professor
            Technology failures happen. Even Kalashnikov is wedging not to mention such complex systems as missile defense.


            No Professor, whatever you say, there is a systemic crisis in the Israeli military-industrial complex.
            1. +8
              25 February 2015 08: 19
              Quote: IS-80
              No Professor, whatever you say, there is a systemic crisis in the Israeli military-industrial complex.

              Everything is more serious there, this is evidence of the collapse of Israel itself. wassat
            2. +3
              25 February 2015 08: 46
              Quote: IS-80
              No Professor, whatever you say, there is a systemic crisis in the Israeli military-industrial complex.

              You are clearly inclined to wishful thinking. No, if this thought warms your soul - to your health, it’s far from existing realities ...
              1. +2
                25 February 2015 09: 08
                Quote: Arestant
                You are clearly inclined to wishful thinking. No, if this thought warms your soul - to your health, it’s far from existing realities ...


                Alas, if only this were my opinion. But the distinguished Professor confirms.

                Quote: professor
                Everything is more serious there, this evidence of the collapse of Israel itself


                Bureaucracy and corruption are ruining the state. It is not too late to urgently begin a tough battle with these destructive forces.
                1. +3
                  25 February 2015 11: 58
                  Quote: IS-80
                  Quote: Arestant
                  You are clearly inclined to wishful thinking. No, if this thought warms your soul - to your health, it’s far from existing realities ...


                  Alas, if only this were my opinion. But the distinguished Professor confirms.

                  Quote: professor
                  Everything is more serious there, this evidence of the collapse of Israel itself


                  Bureaucracy and corruption are ruining the state. It is not too late to urgently begin a tough battle with these destructive forces.

                  Yes, go to the anti-crisis march in Tel Aviv under the slogan of ARMY, away from the most advanced and lacking analogues of the Israeli military-industrial complex. Send Zhenya Albats and Borya Nemtsov there and everything will go right away lol
            3. +2
              25 February 2015 09: 31
              Quote: IS-80
              No Professor, whatever you say, there is a systemic crisis in the Israeli military-industrial complex.

              The ingenious conclusion of 8)
              1. +2
                25 February 2015 09: 37
                Quote: Pimply
                The ingenious conclusion of 8)

                Well, you probably exaggerate a little. And so in general, yes.
                1. +1
                  25 February 2015 10: 15
                  Quote: IS-80

                  Well, you probably exaggerate a little. And so in general, yes.

                  And in more detail you can chain of conclusions 8)
                  1. 0
                    25 February 2015 10: 30
                    Quote: Pimply
                    And in more detail you can chain of conclusions 8)


                    When creating the system, elements of the Iron Dome were probably used. The iron dome works perfectly, the system tracks everything perfectly. And here they write that -
                    "the system was unable to track the target with sufficient accuracy." And the second time in a row. What does this mean? Systemic crisis!
                    1. +1
                      25 February 2015 18: 53
                      Quote: IS-80
                      When creating the system, elements of the Iron Dome were probably used.

                      No.
                  2. 0
                    25 February 2015 10: 45
                    Citizens, you understand that IS-80 is just joking, and you are being fooled.
                    1. +2
                      25 February 2015 11: 06
                      Quote: ssergn
                      Citizens, you understand that IS-80 is just joking, and you are being fooled.

                      So I'm not too serious 8)
                      1. 0
                        25 February 2015 13: 59
                        And I and I, and I have the same opinion 8) laughing laughing laughing laughing
            4. +2
              25 February 2015 09: 34
              Uhhh? How did you make that conclusion? Based on what?
            5. +6
              25 February 2015 13: 07
              No Professor, whatever you say, there is a systemic crisis in the Israeli military-industrial complex.
              Enough bliss, dear ones, everyone doesn’t immediately fly with us; we just recently brought a long-range missile for the S-400, and what year they are feeding with the S-500, and I don’t hear a word about Morpheus for a long time. if 50% of UAVs sold from Israel, if they buy f-35s from the USA with the condition that they will supply a lot of their electronics, if the Su-30MKIs all fly with Israeli equipment, and India buys the A-50 from us and puts the radar in Israel, this is a crisis or something. I understand, of course, you can rejoice at other people's luck, but you shouldn’t fall into insanity, otherwise we will become like the Great Ukrainians.
              1. +3
                25 February 2015 13: 30
                Quote: Sergei1982
                The United States buys f-35 with the condition that they put a lot of their electronics

                800 sets of wings, by the way, will also be produced in Israel, like helmets
            6. +2
              25 February 2015 17: 46
              Quote: IS-80
              Quote: professor
              Technology failures happen. Even Kalashnikov is wedging not to mention such complex systems as missile defense.


              No Professor, whatever you say, there is a systemic crisis in the Israeli military-industrial complex.

              You exacerbate the situation somewhat. laughing Of course, I would like to get a missile defense system, without trial and error, but apparently this is only from the realm of fairy tales. By the way, the former director of the Homa project (a three-level missile defense system) spoke on the Gal-Galats radio today and he said that:
              1) The Hetz-2 trials were truly a failure. This is a pilot improvement of existing missiles, which led to the failure of the tests, i.e. did not work and led to a miss. It is known what the problem is and now it is being brought to mind. At the same time, this does not affect the quality and / or operational readiness of the Hets-2 missiles on alert, in which this improvement was not made.
              2) In the case of the Hets-3, this is not about a malfunction in the rocket itself, but about urgent changes to the test plans (launch trajectories) made at the last moment and therefore the exercises had to be interrupted.
               
          6. +3
            25 February 2015 08: 37
            Anything happens when testing a new one. Understand and eliminate the shortcomings.
          7. The comment was deleted.
          8. +1
            25 February 2015 09: 33
            Prof, and kinetic interceptors, as I understand it? Need a direct hit?
            By the way, is the Kupol also kinetics? Or a high-explosive warhead with submunitions?
            1. +2
              25 February 2015 10: 58
              Quote: Mairos
              Prof, and kinetic interceptors, as I understand it? Need a direct hit?
              By the way, is the Kupol also kinetics? Or a high-explosive warhead with submunitions?

              In "Hets-2" non-contact, in "Hets-3" kinetics, in the residential complex, as far as I remember - kinetics
              1. +1
                25 February 2015 14: 18
                Understood thanks!
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. +2
              25 February 2015 18: 59
              Quote: Mairos
              Prof, and kinetic interceptors, as I understand it? Need a direct hit?
              By the way, is the Kupol also kinetics? Or a high-explosive warhead with submunitions?

              In Khets-2 explosive, Khets-3 kinetic, in Tamir LCD explosives.
        2. +1
          25 February 2015 09: 30
          Quote: insafufa
          Something I do not observe the Professor with his comments, that this is all fiction and this is done from the point of view of misinformation and, in general, the Israeli technique of Supere duper
          But the Moscow system is needed to intercept from 4 to 6 missiles to defeat 1 ballistic targets
          So I read that specialists say that in order to hit a warhead, it needs to be fired at least twice exactly when it hits the target
          A hit-to-kil mode is difficult to implement

          You are not satisfied with the sufficient degree of openness of the tests, do you prefer to learn from the newspapers "has collapsed again"?
          1. +1
            25 February 2015 09: 39
            Well, you bent it. Two missiles of the A-135 system hit a ballistic target with guarantee! I'm not talking about special warheads.
            1. +1
              25 February 2015 13: 16
              Quote: Mairos
              Two missiles of the A-135 system hit a ballistic target with guarantee!
              Yes, this is recorded in the TTX system.
              But recently Mamontov played TV "Country's Shield" all over the country. All is well, but when they began to play the reflection of a single ballistic target heading for Moscow ... they gave up! Who did not notice, go back to the time of the end of the training and the report of the colonel with glasses (the commander of the duty crew or the senior at the air defense command post?) And there it sounded: Target destroyed, consumption - 6 (!). This also made me very crazy!
              So 100 anti-ballistic missiles will be enough only for 16 ICBMs with such firing. Urgently needed S-500!
    3. +6
      25 February 2015 07: 32
      why the Jewish boys did not whistle in the 90s when Masov quit the military industrial complex and leaving for his historical homeland
      1. +2
        25 February 2015 07: 41
        Quote: Siberian German
        why the Jewish boys did not whistle in the 90s when Masov quit the military industrial complex and leaving for his historical homeland

        And until the 90s, it means that neither science nor industry existed in Israel, and certainly did not fight with their missiles and in their tanks and planes ... fool
        1. +3
          25 February 2015 08: 00
          “Don't be angry, Mr. Tomato. From anger, they say, vitamins disappear "

          Professor, as you put yourself here, with your colleagues on the star flag, you’ll get such caustic comments request
          1. 0
            25 February 2015 10: 06
            So yes ... the "elite" always think so ... although they do not know the score completely ...
            Israel is less than a hundred years old, but there too - you still know what happened in 90?
            Pendots are a little over a hundred (I know that more than 200, but at first they were biting at first for a piece of bread, then for power) and now they are teaching the world how to live right belay
            This is such an age gap ... like a teenage race feel when there is no mosk, one accordion plays the day to fly belay
            But times are changing ... time is running out ... and for infantility in adulthood you can shovel a little in the near future ... yes ...
        2. +4
          25 February 2015 08: 30
          and that Israel has its own aircraft? - or your air forces fly on planes issued under your license in the USA - tell me, maybe it missed
          1. +1
            25 February 2015 08: 34
            Quote: Siberian German
            and that Israel has its own aircraft? - or your air forces fly on planes issued under your license in the USA - tell me, maybe it missed

            https://www.dropbox.com/s/cn0tg6k8y57rzly/KRYLIA_VOZMEDIA.pdf?dl=0
            1. +3
              25 February 2015 09: 07
              Mirages, Skyhawks, Phantoms, F-15, F-16, and well, a little Kfir smile
          2. +3
            25 February 2015 11: 01
            Quote: Siberian German
            and that Israel has its own aircraft? - or your air forces fly on planes issued under your license in the USA - tell me, maybe it missed

            In Israel, a quite successful Lavi aircraft was produced, there were Kfir aircraft - they are still used in Latin America. Israel produces wings for Lockheed Martin (in particular for the F-35), and also has advanced avionics systems that keep up with the American level
            1. +2
              25 February 2015 11: 10
              I do not argue with your arguments - but the fact that during the mass emigration at the beginning of the 90's in Israel a huge number of developments of the Soviet military-industrial complex were exported which gave their military science and the military-industrial complex a lot of fact
              1. +2
                25 February 2015 11: 24
                Quote: Siberian German
                I do not argue with your arguments - but the fact that during the mass emigration at the beginning of the 90's in Israel a huge number of developments of the Soviet military-industrial complex were exported which gave their military science and the military-industrial complex a lot of fact

                In the military-industrial complex, the number of specialists from the former USSR is disappearingly small, if that.
              2. +4
                25 February 2015 17: 48
                during mass emigration in the early 90's
                it is a fact
                In Israel, a huge number of developments of the Soviet military-industrial complex were exported
                these are your fantasies
            2. +4
              25 February 2015 11: 51
              Lavi clone in service with the Chinese Air Force.
              "Our sorrowful work has not disappeared ..." smile
            3. -1
              25 February 2015 14: 35
              Quote: Pimply
              In Israel, the quite successful Lavi plane was released, there were Kfir aircraft - they are still used in Latin America.

              Once again pimply fantasizes smile
              "Lavi" was created in cooperation with the United States and is essentially a hybrid of the F-16 and the "Kfir", and "Kfir" in South America is not as happy as he wants to imagine.
              In short, the next "tales" about the great military-industrial complex of Tel Aviv lol
              1. +2
                25 February 2015 14: 46
                Quote: quilted jacket
                Once again pimply fantasizes
                "Lavi" was created in cooperation with the United States and is essentially a hybrid of the F-16 and the "Kfir", and "Kfir" in South America is not as happy as he wants to imagine.
                In short, the next "tales" about the great military-industrial complex of Tel Aviv

                8) Vatnichik, sing 8) You are always fun to listen to 8)))
                1. -1
                  25 February 2015 14: 49
                  Quote: Pimply
                  8) Vatnichik, sing 8) You are always fun to listen to 8)))

                  Well hanged ourselves, "storyteller" lol
          3. +4
            25 February 2015 13: 24
            Quote: Siberian German
            Tell me, maybe it missed
            It’s impossible to keep track of everything - I missed it!
            Quote: Pimply
            possesses advanced avionics systems that are not behind the American level
            which we bought on occasion for deliveries to foreign orders. With ours - there were certain ... uh ... inconsistencies.
            So, in a dispute you need to be honest, first of all, to yourself and - hi respect your opponent!
    4. +5
      25 February 2015 09: 11
      C'mon, you have to pay tribute - the Jews have sharpened their heads in this area; be healthy - they will correct
  2. +1
    25 February 2015 07: 03
    If you suffer for a very long time, something will happen))
  3. +2
    25 February 2015 07: 03
    Here are those times! But those two!
    And they call it the smartest nation!
    error in the calculations ...
  4. +3
    25 February 2015 07: 05
    "And the Jews are silent and smile quietly" (M. Zhvanetsky).
  5. +3
    25 February 2015 07: 09
    Patience and labor will grind everything so that we wish all of everything.
    A little off topic but here:
    Israeli Prime Minister refused to meet with US Congress Democrats
    The request of two Democratic senators from the US Congress for a private meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was rejected, media reported.
  6. 0
    25 February 2015 07: 09
    I apologize for the off-topic question ...

    What's going on with the site? Pages are not displayed quite correctly, in particular the icon ("ON line" - "OFFLINE") and others ...
    Is it just me?
    1. +4
      25 February 2015 07: 22
      Quote: Corsair
      What's going on with the site? Pages are not displayed quite correctly, in particular the icon ("ON line" - "OFFLINE") and others ...
      Is it just me?

      hi There may be a problem with your browser. You can check on another .... On my Firefox, everything is in order ...
      1. 0
        25 February 2015 07: 29
        Quote: RusDV
        Quote: Corsair
        What's going on with the site? Pages are not displayed quite correctly, in particular the icon ("ON line" - "OFFLINE") and others ...
        Is it just me?

        hi There may be a problem with your browser. You can check on another .... On my Firefox, everything is in order ...

        Already cleared the "cookies" and restarted request ...

        Thanks, I’ll check now ...

        PS: Strange ... On Fox the same thing ... Well, nothing, not fatal ...
        1. +1
          25 February 2015 07: 38
          Quote: Corsair
          PS: Strange ... It's the same on Fox ... Well, nothing, not fatal ...

          smile yes, happiness is not in badges ...
      2. +1
        25 February 2015 08: 14
        And my formatting buttons stopped working when typing a message. You have to manually hammer in all sorts of [quote] and [b].
  7. +2
    25 February 2015 07: 13
    In general, this is a normal phenomenon in the creation of such a complex technique. By 7-10 times, the system will go where it should. And, I do not like Jews at all.
    1. +2
      25 February 2015 13: 30
      Quote: Signor Tomato
      By 7-10 times, the system will go where it should.
      This is not a "system", but a drushlag! The probability of 10-14% is not even considered for adoption, and as a basis for full-scale tests - too!
  8. 0
    25 February 2015 07: 14
    Well, let's say they’ll finish this missile defense, so how much money and time will be spent on it! Moreover, as I understand it, the rocket was without a means of breakthrough! So the interception of a stupidly bolistic disc is the goal for the 80 years and they will need 20 years to finish their missile defense
    1. +1
      25 February 2015 09: 33
      Quote: Alex_Rarog
      Well, let's say they’ll finish this missile defense, so how much money and time will be spent on it! Moreover, as I understand it, the rocket was without a means of breakthrough! So the interception of a stupidly bolistic disc is the goal for the 80 years and they will need 20 years to finish their missile defense

      Finishing your own pro is actually the task of any normal state
    2. +1
      25 February 2015 11: 54
      "Breakthrough means" if you mean maneuvering,
      occurs on the final section of the trajectory, and interception is carried out BEFORE this -
      in the middle ballistic section.
      1. +1
        25 February 2015 13: 42
        Quote: voyaka uh
        "Breakthrough means"
        Eco, you famously dismissed false heavy goals! It’s impossible, my friend, to reduce everything to maneuvering BBs, although this is also important.
        Quote: voyaka uh
        interception is carried out BEFORE this is in the middle ballistic section.
        Is it enough for your complex to intercept ICBMs on the ascending branch of the trajectory? SM-3 and then up to 250 km it works, and your child prodigy is worse than that of amers? Well, well ... Dreaming is not harmful! Harmful - do not dream !!!
        Ahhh! I understood! The God's elect, on the quiet, made the space echelon of missile defense !!! And they are silent, Judah, as they took water in their mouths! (Or maybe something else !?)
        1. 0
          26 February 2015 04: 55
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          CM-3 and even up to 250 km it works, and your wunderwaffle is worse than that of amers?

          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          ... quietly, they made a missile defense PRO space train !!! And they are silent ...


          Watch from 1: 03 request


          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          Well, well ... Dreaming is not harmful! Harmful - do not dream !!!

          1. +1
            26 February 2015 17: 37
            Quote: And Us Rat
            Watch from 1: 03

            Mr. SAM is fluttered (do not think anything bad, God forbid! Solely by the avatar!) Do not confuse God's gift with scrambled eggs! Carrying out a transatmospheric test (test) does not mean creating a missile defense space echelon based on Almaz-type combat space stations ...
            This is firstly!
            Secondly, if you get involved in a tug of war (as at one time the PROFESSOR!), Be impartial! Answer the directly posed question: is Jewish HEC cooler than American Aegis? or still not?
            Thirdly. Explain to the wretched: what does the exam have to do with it? Or is something in the author’s text not suitable for you? Then learn Russian with a PROFESSOR! He also tried to be clever! Until he sat down in a puddle and blacklisted me.
            About warnings! It will be a little shallow, and still think of yourself as a bird (again, judging by the avatar!) I don't know what you saw, but from the point of view of formal semantics, sir, you are a poor student! Because any unbiased reader will explain in words what it is: "THREE WHOLE, FOURTEEN HUNDREDS and THREE CHILDREN". Now we can go to court if you wish! I do not know what you mean, personally I - just what I wrote!
            PS And as for the exam - think! Maybe check yourself, they say it helps!
            Sincerely yours, KAA. hi
            1. 0
              27 February 2015 01: 47
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              Mr. S.A.M. is floppy (do not think anything bad, God forbid! Exclusively on the profile picture!)

              Nude nude, petty trolling knee-deep on me, does the taste of bile eat? wink (The right to wear this "birdie" is earned by sweat and blood, and not everyone - Google to help wink )

              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              Carrying out a transatmospheric test (test) does not mean creating a missile defense space echelon based on combat space stations of the Almaz type.

              Could you tell me, in what orbit Almaz is now? lol Oh yes, I remembered - not at all. fellow

              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              Secondly, if you get involved in a tug of war (as at one time the PROFESSOR!), Be impartial! Answer the directly posed question: is Jewish HEC cooler than American Aegis?

              In my opinion, I have not yet met a more amateurish question here. lol
              It's like asking what is better - a tank or a radar.
              Aegis is not a missile system, but BIUS, what they connect to - they will shoot and will be, at least by the same HEC.

              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              Thirdly. Explain to the wretched: what does the exam have to do with it?

              Not understood? I'm so sorry. crying

              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              About the warnings! It will be too small ... I do not know what you had in mind, I personally - only what I wrote!

              No need to violate - it will not be "small". This is not discussed, veiled mate is prohibited. And also say thank you that Smirnov was not the first to see this, he immediately bans for it.

              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              And as for the exam - think! Maybe check yourself, they say it helps!

              Judging by the results, it does not help. lol
    3. +1
      26 February 2015 04: 37
      Quote: Alex_Rarog
      ... to finishоdeveloping your missile defense


  9. +3
    25 February 2015 07: 15
    Well, the first pancake is always lumpy. It will be finalized, launched, and we will again be obscene.
    1. +2
      25 February 2015 13: 35
      Quote: Corporal
      Well, the first pancake is always lumpy. It will be finalized, launched, and we will again be obscene.

      Not the first pancake. This is a test of refinement, in different modes. Bugs that pop up pop up. In previous tests of both systems, they performed well.
  10. -6
    25 February 2015 07: 15
    Among the inhabitants of Israel and working in the military-industrial complex of Israel, there are many from the countries of the former USSR, they then know the saying - "Moscow did not build right away", difficult work, everything will work out.
    1. Lenivets
      +7
      25 February 2015 07: 53
      "Moscow didn't build right away." Have you translated from English? The saying sounds like: Moscow was not built right away.
  11. +5
    25 February 2015 07: 18
    Failures in testing new weapons, in particular rocket technology, are commonplace. Why are some happy?)))
    1. +3
      25 February 2015 07: 32
      Nagaybak ... why do some rejoice ??? ... phobics of local bottling and we have a dime a dozen, can they jump for joy ... ??? And that for me, THE ROAD WILL BE SUPPORTED BY THE GOING. drinks
  12. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  13. +8
    25 February 2015 07: 46
    Israel's "iron dome" is quite a working one and has been tested in practice. Improving the system is a permanent process, and unsuccessful results are also a result, no less important than successful ... I do not know of systems with "only successful" launches ...
  14. 0
    25 February 2015 07: 50
    Yes, no big deal HETZ 2,3,4,5,6 everything will turn out. feel
    1. The comment was deleted.
  15. +2
    25 February 2015 07: 55
    Yesterday, according to Litofsky news, they announced the production of "high-tech military products" on the scale of China !!! Russians will not be sold, but Jews ...
  16. HAM
    +3
    25 February 2015 08: 16
    You should not rejoice in other people's failures, technology is technology, one thing is annoying - no matter how you have to build your own "iron dome", there are too many "iron-brain" ones in the Ukraine ...
  17. +8
    25 February 2015 08: 21
    I see no reason either to rejoice or to be upset. The most ordinary process of testing and fine-tuning products. Well, the Jews will establish their system. This means that opponents will seek ways to overcome it. As a result, a vicious circle and nothing essentially changes. Politicians butt, but ordinary people disentangle.
  18. +3
    25 February 2015 08: 46
    For Israel, such a system is vital. Nobody remembers how Iraq launched Scuds at Israel, even though Israel did not fight against it?
    1. 0
      27 February 2015 02: 36
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      For Israel, such a system is vital. Nobody remembers how Iraq launched Scuds at Israel, even though Israel did not fight against it?

      Israel may need a missile defense system, but Israel’s strength in this system is not enough.

      As for the Iron Dome, the flag in their hands, a drum on their neck - to shoot down unguided missiles is not the most difficult task for the 21st century.
  19. +6
    25 February 2015 09: 36
    Something tells me that they will succeed. And unsuccessful launches - which system did not have them? He repeatedly wrote that it is very unfortunate that Russia and Israel are not allies, or at least there is no normal military-technical cooperation between our countries.
    1. +2
      25 February 2015 11: 02
      Quote: teron
      Something tells me that they will succeed. And unsuccessful launches - which system did not have them? He repeatedly wrote that it is very unfortunate that Russia and Israel are not allies, or at least there is no normal military-technical cooperation between our countries.

      In general, for Hetz, unsuccessful launches are more likely an exception than a rule.
      1. +1
        25 February 2015 11: 12
        Unsuccessful launches are also a result, reveals childhood illnesses and deficiencies in different modes of the product. Without failures in testing new models of equipment anywhere. The main thing is to do without human casualties and draw the right conclusions.
        1. +1
          25 February 2015 11: 25
          Quote: teron
          Unsuccessful launches are also a result, reveals childhood illnesses and deficiencies in different modes of the product. Without failures in testing new models of equipment anywhere. The main thing is to do without human casualties and draw the right conclusions.

          Exactly
  20. +1
    25 February 2015 09: 44
    There is no reason for joy. It would be more interesting to hear about the American sistership of this PROPOSE.
    And even then, the American missile defense is a cover for the deployment of perching-shaped INF missiles in Europe.

    And here the article is muddy. What simulated the goal?
    OTR, short-range missile, medium? Whole or detachable BB?
    A mystery covered in a gloom, an article about nothing.
    The United States would test - they would spell the whole essence of the test two weeks before a successful miss (or hit the BB with a radio beacon) laughing
  21. +3
    25 February 2015 10: 04
    Why did you attack the professor? Those who create something know that nothing happens right away as intended. There is always a mining period. This is the norm. And the more complex the product, the longer this period.
    1. +2
      25 February 2015 11: 05
      Quote: imugn
      Why did you attack the professor? Those who create something know that nothing happens right away as intended. There is always a mining period. This is the norm. And the more complex the product, the longer this period.

      The vast majority of system tests that one that the other were successful. Then they were tested in some new modes and found bugs that did not pop up before. That is, in general, not bad.
    2. 0
      April 9 2015 15: 42
      Yes, they’re just kitchen anti-Semites)) they’re to blame for everything in Tel Aviv.
  22. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  23. 0
    25 February 2015 10: 49
    Mirages, Skyhawks, Phantoms, F-15, F-16, and well, a little Kfir ...

    "Kfir" s are made according to the drawings stolen by "mossadniki" in Switzerland (that is, in fact, it is a "pirate" copy), and its engine is American, the same as on "Phantom". The pinnacle of engineering, you will not say anything ...
    1. +2
      25 February 2015 11: 46
      "Kfir" s are made according to the drawings stolen by "mossadniki" in Switzerland
      If this is true, then they are blaming the Mossad, and if you could be offended by the Swiss, but from the home of the elephants about this, is there nothing stopping you in the eyes? And what needs to be fixed, and even sold. And if Russia wants to buy something, then what will you say?
      1. +2
        25 February 2015 13: 45
        Well, you see ..... in the eyes of the log .... but it is not.
  24. 0
    25 February 2015 11: 11
    I understand how long it will take, but the sons of Israel will finish this topic. But that's not how I do not understand why Israel is "penguins" "light elves". I certainly understand the "penguin" of the "light elves" the proud bird until you kick it and fly, but does Israel need it? To finish everything behind the "light elves" with a jigsaw, what would be human and how it should be. Explain to me wretched why you are not tired?
    1. +1
      25 February 2015 11: 52
      Imagine that I asked the same question, the basis of the answer was "for our needs" and, as you know, they are different.
      Yes, still not evening, far from evening.
    2. +3
      25 February 2015 11: 58
      "Penguin" checked by Israeli pilots
      and said "Good". In addition, we will receive immediately
      "Super Penguin" with our avionics and open
      sors code of software. We will make "King Penguin" out of it.
      Fly like an albatross ... wink
      1. 0
        25 February 2015 12: 04
        Well, if the current is two kicks, then there will be a duper penguin I do not argue
        The Pentagon has softened the technical requirements for the F-35 (JSF) fighter for the second time in the past year. Reducing requirements — including a slower acceleration and turning speed — should make life easier for a problematic JSF program worth a trillion dollars, allowing it to move closer to full-scale production, despite ongoing problems with the sophisticated design of the aircraft. Under the old requirements, a fighter who is supposed to take up service in the 2018 or 2019 year would probably not have passed the tests.

        At the same time, newly discovered problems may cause the manufacturer F-35, concern Lockheed Martin, to add additional fire suppression equipment to the design, which will further increase the weight of the aircraft and further reduce its maneuverability. JSF, according to the idea, should be a universal ship, equally capable of dropping bombs and fighting with air targets - and the second task requires it to be extremely mobile in the air.

        For pilots who have to lead the F-35 into battle, its reduced performance may mean that they will not be able to outrun and maneuver the latest series of Russian and Chinese fighters. Even before downgrading, some analysts questioned the JSF’s ability to defeat the new Sukhoi and Shenyang fighters in battle. Despite the reduction in requirements, Lockheed very strangely declares that their new ship is more maneuverable than any other fighter in the world, except for their F-22 aircraft.


        In general, the F-35 program is rapidly losing altitude. As a result, the gap between expectations and reality regarding the fighter, which is supposed to be the basis of US air power for the next 50 years, is widening.

        If we analyze the changes made, it should be said that they, apparently, are caused by higher than expected resistance of the single-engine design of the aircraft. The consequences of this for pilots who are fighting on the front lines can be extremely serious. Less maneuverability makes the F-35 more vulnerable in combat with other fighters. A slow acceleration means that the aircraft can spend less time at maximum speed. "Long-term transonic acceleration at full power burns a very large amount of fuel," say air experts.
  25. 0
    25 February 2015 12: 44
    KVN is just beginning. Have the Jews gone crazy or what ?! In the country, most of the citizens of Israel know "Russian", but that is how to call the ultra-weapon Hetz-12345-even in Honduras they could not go for it, in general, where Hetz is there. It could have been called like - the arrow of Yahweh or whatever you call it - Jehovah ... here, among the zombified among some strata of society, they call him Putin))), so we expect from you perfect anti-missiles - PUTIN 1 ... fellow
    1. +2
      25 February 2015 13: 31
      < smile > You are right, almost, you understood our attitude to the threat: OUR HETZ Rocket Understandable yes? (not you personally, meaning a rocket). And who else says that not "Russians" are developing, well, names at least.
      1. +2
        25 February 2015 13: 44
        Correctly the name as the name is not without reason captain Vrungel said:
        "As you name the ship, so it will float" laughing
  26. The comment was deleted.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"