The planet needs the axis Moscow - Tehran - Delhi - Beijing

32
The planet needs the axis Moscow - Tehran - Delhi - Beijing The current reaction of Moscow, the Russian Foreign Ministry to the actions of the United States and NATO is ridiculous. Our geopolitical adversary, with whom we have been fighting for over a thousand years, is putting up its new outposts in Romania, Poland, and Turkey, threatening our strategic interests in Syria and Iran. NATO holds exercises near our borders. And the Russian Federation expresses “concern”, asks to provide it with “legal guarantees”.

The whole world just laughs at this verbal husk. On the planet, as well as three thousand, and a hundred years ago, the right of the strong, “the law of the jungle” prevails. The strongest and clever survives: the people and the country, capable of giving back, responding to the enemy, will live, others will have to give up "a place under the sun."

In fact, the current Russian government is occupied with empty talkers, while the US administration is pursuing a policy of a real empire. The United States is expanding culturally (Hollywood shapes the consciousness of our children and young people), informational (world media carry out such information that white easily becomes black and vice versa, so Chechen bandits turn into heroic insurgents fighting against the yoke of the evil empire), economic (control world currency), military (surround Russia, Iran and China with their bases).

It is time for the Russian leadership to “respond”, to pursue its long-term global policy aimed at asserting Russian values, culture, language, economy, strengthening our military security. We must follow the example of the Americans, who began by declaring North America a zone of their interests, then both American continents. Then spread their interests across the planet.

We must form our long-term strategy, where there is a certain gradation of the importance of countries and regions for Russia. Thus, the post-Soviet space and a number of countries bordering on us are of paramount importance for the Russian Federation. Stability in China, Afghanistan, Iran and Syria is also in the first place for us. The zone of our strategic interests where it is impossible to retreat is the Arctic.

Cooperation with NATO must be curtailed, since all the steps of this organization are a danger to the peoples of our civilization and the Russian state.

Then find common interests with the great powers of Eurasia. Beijing, Delhi, Tehran are very concerned about the actions of the United States and the West to destabilize the situation on the territory of our continent. They respond with an increase in the cost of their security, but this is not enough. Each of the powers has vulnerabilities, there are ways to "shake up" the situation, dismember the state, cause a civil war. And only by creating our own military-political union, we can be confident in security.

The Moscow-Teheran-Delhi axis - Beijing will create the possibility of a peaceful life for hundreds of millions of people. Restore the balance of power on the planet. At present, this balance has been broken, in fact, the West is terrorizing the planet. This can lead to very bloody events, the death of millions of people in the new planetary slaughter. The union of the great Eurasian powers will keep the peace, will return stability. Russia, Iran, India, China will be able to solve many global problems, for example, restore normal life in Afghanistan, destroying the Afghan drug problem.

Moreover, such an alliance can be created on the basis of the SCO - the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. If the current leadership of Russia cannot or does not want to work for the good of the Russian people, he must leave.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    21 September 2011 08: 37
    Such an alliance, if properly organized, calls into question the very existence of NATO. Purely alignment of forces. Iran and India seem to be quite normal allies, but China ... They may decide that they themselves will cope well (not without reason).

    If (imagine) this happens, the EU and NATO will nervously smoke in the corners of politics.

    And the government really needs to retire. The meow about Syria is a clear confirmation of this.
    1. Mesniy
      0
      21 September 2011 09: 56
      India is a west-oriented country, they are not, China is an enemy of India, has problems with muslims in the Uyghur region - it makes friends with Iran zapadlo.
      The article is simply niochem, complete nonsense.
      as life has shown, the one who opposes civilization (the Nazi regime, the social camp, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Libya, etc., etc.) is falling apart. Or is living in poverty - Sevkorey, Cuba, and Russia too.
    2. Mesniy
      -4
      21 September 2011 09: 58
      India is a west-oriented country, they are not mentally ill, China is an enemy of India, has problems with muslims in the Uigur region - it makes friends with Iran.
      The article is simply niochem, complete nonsense.
      as life has shown, the one who opposes civilization (the Nazi regime, the social camp, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Libya, etc., etc.) is falling apart. Or is living in poverty - Sevkorey, Cuba, and Russia too.
      1. irony
        +2
        21 September 2011 10: 05
        Idrit madrid! And civilization is YU ES HEY and NATO? So, I see how such elements, in the event of a direct clash with potential friends, out of "patriotic" motives, surrender everything and everyone. Oh, and the earth is carrying you ...
        1. Sobibor
          -8
          21 September 2011 11: 18
          Quote: irony
          Idrit madrid! And civilization is YU ES HEY and NATO? So, I see how such elements, in the event of a direct clash with potential friends, out of "patriotic" motives, surrender everything and everyone. Oh, and the earth is carrying you ...

          You now clap the invention of American civilization - the Internet, and clap from another device that American civilization also invented.
          If you are such a patriot - why not with a blalaika and a cap with earflaps, but with a computer and the Internet?
          1. +3
            21 September 2011 12: 54
            Well...?
            American civilization is a civilization of the native inhabitants of America - Indians. What they have now - let specially trained people break their heads over this. Each Pindos considers himself a patriot, while calculating his salary he uses Arabic numbers. No need to complicate things. There are many civilizations and there are pros and cons everywhere, and in no civilization it is considered shameful to use the useful inventions of other civilizations.
            If you follow your logic, then you should write the message not in Cyrillic, but in English.
          2. Igor Vladimirovich
            +4
            21 September 2011 16: 52
            In fairness, it should be noted that the computer was invented in the Union, and more precisely in Ukraine, in Kiev.
            1. ballian
              0
              22 September 2011 08: 03
              In fairness, it should be noted that you said nonsense - more correctly so -
              "in the Union, the first computer was invented in Kiev"
            2. ballian
              0
              22 September 2011 08: 08
              In fairness, it should be noted that you said nonsense - more correctly so -
              "in the Union, the first computer was invented in Kiev"
            3. ballian
              0
              22 September 2011 08: 09
              In fairness, it should be noted that you said nonsense - more correctly so -
              "in the Union, the first computer was invented in Kiev"
            4. ballian
              0
              22 September 2011 08: 09
              In fairness, it should be noted that you said nonsense - more correctly so -
              "in the Union, the first computer was invented in Kiev"
          3. irony
            0
            22 September 2011 00: 29
            Your brain is washed, if patriotism for you is popular prints. The Americans represent us like that. ...
            1. oper66
              +1
              22 September 2011 00: 44
              Dear, you can rinse the skull and the brain is washed
              1. irony
                0
                22 September 2011 20: 59
                The result is one.
        2. asavchenko59
          0
          22 September 2011 10: 25
          They surrender everything even without a fight! Fear, meanness and money-grubbing: these are their idols!
        3. asavchenko59
          0
          22 September 2011 10: 26
          They surrender everything even without a fight! Fear, meanness and money-grubbing: these are their idols!
        4. asavchenko59
          0
          22 September 2011 10: 26
          They surrender everything even without a fight! Fear, meanness and money-grubbing: these are their idols!
        5. asavchenko59
          0
          22 September 2011 10: 27
          They surrender everything even without a fight! Fear, meanness and money-grubbing: these are their idols!
        6. asavchenko59
          0
          22 September 2011 10: 28
          They surrender everything even without a fight! Fear, meanness and money-grubbing: these are their idols!
      2. His
        0
        21 September 2011 17: 50
        The Nazi regime arose in the united Europe, was contained by the majority of this very Europe. So much for civilization. They only understand the holy fist on their bowed head
  2. Sobibor
    +4
    21 September 2011 11: 16
    The last axis ended its existence sadly
    1. +3
      21 September 2011 14: 18
      One can not agree with this.
  3. +2
    21 September 2011 11: 18
    I propose to introduce a new heading "Humor" on the site and stuff like that there, it's just etalon! The author on page 1 has done so much, combining all the clichés and conducting a deep analysis of the world economic and political situation, that I express my sincere admiration for him!
  4. gans
    -1
    21 September 2011 11: 19
    actually, SCO was organized by Putin
  5. 0
    21 September 2011 14: 01
    Say that China and Iran have a lot of contradictions with India and they can’t be united strategically? I doubt it very much. If there is a common enemy, the aggressor, then everyone will unite, in the same Libya, even the States and Alkaida have united to remove Gaddafi, they are on the drum. And in the face of real danger, I think such an alliance is likely ..
  6. zczczc
    +2
    21 September 2011 14: 05
    How can you put India and China on one axis?
    And how can we make friends with China, if we ever finally get stronger and expel millions of their illegal immigrants (from Siberia in the first place) and will not sell hydrocarbons? I don’t understand this ...

    We can be on any axis only as long as we voluntarily pay tribute and are satisfied with the third-grade status - this is the case with Europe, it will be the same with China, and with anyone, because anyone who goes half-bent is not seriously considered.

    I would like the author to answer this question ...
  7. jamert
    +3
    21 September 2011 14: 41
    After about 15 years, China itself cools the states without any Axes. Or Os. Only Russia will not be sweeter from this.
    1. Maksim
      0
      22 September 2011 17: 15
      Russia has changed over 15 years. (in the good sense of these words.?)
  8. +2
    21 September 2011 15: 02
    I have already said that, indeed, with the current megaliberal leadership, we have no foreign policy, and there is no chance of gaining at least some weight in the world arena, and it is all the more unrealistic to create an axis now .. We need a person in power who will think about his people, and not only about their Western "friends", seeking their praise by any anti-national means!
  9. ALEX-MAK8
    -1
    21 September 2011 16: 07
    China is already preparing, ours are preoccupied with domestic political problems .., I think secretly, all the same, we are aware of the danger, but we are behind in armament, spirituality and morality - this belt is virtually good, but in fact it takes time to create it - normal people definitely .... or so to speak, as they say in Russia (until the thunder strikes, the man does not cross himself) ... bully
  10. ZEBRASH
    +1
    21 September 2011 18: 51
    In my opinion, such an alliance is needed, and it would be, if finalized as it should, stronger than NATO.

    "The current reaction of Moscow, the Russian Foreign Ministry to the actions of the US and NATO is simply ridiculous. Our geopolitical enemy, with whom we have been fighting for a thousand years, is setting up new outposts in Romania, Poland, Turkey, and is threatening our strategic interests in Syria and Iran. NATO is conducting exercises near our borders, while the Russian Federation expresses its "concern" and asks for "legal guarantees".

    Yes ... Khrushchev responded harshly with missiles in Cuba to the deployment of amer missiles in Turkey. Although because of the "Caribbean Crisis" a nuclear war almost started, but we did not wipe ourselves out and did not turn a blind eye to it, but adequately answered the Penodos am Not now wassat
  11. Marat
    +1
    21 September 2011 22: 16
    It seems to me that such a block (unfortunately of course) is impossible for the following reasons

    1. The states now rule the world - and they influence the politics of both Russia and China and India - they will not allow the formation of a bloc against them

    2. If such a bloc were formed - unfortunately the pendos are so strong that they would destroy it even without war - by political and economic means

    3. India and China are geopolitical adversaries. Vietnam is also a "candidate" for such a bloc - and also an enemy of China

    4. In any block there is someone in charge - who rules - now Russia will not be able to rule China and India

    One thing is indisputable - Iran needs to be "covered" from the pendos - this is a friendly country to us - which is not averse to both the SCO and the CSTO anywhere - as long as the pendos do not bomb. It all depends on the firmness and consistency of Russia and China - because not only we, but also China should be concerned - it is also beneficial for them to keep Iran intact
  12. 0
    22 September 2011 07: 30
    The problem is that traditionally we probably have no one but Serbs at all. I don’t know - India is likely, China - is dangerous in any way, as soon as Iran settles problems with the United States, it may unite the Arabs against us and from Central Asia also beat us, cutting the country into two parts. Most likely we have nothing to share only with South Africa and South America.
    1. ballian
      -2
      22 September 2011 08: 11
      Where do they see the aggressor there? Is someone attacking India, Ktay, Russia?
      China supported the same operation in Libya - this is only in the imagination of paranoid enemies around.
      What will Russia become in alliance with India and China? Correctly a pawn-six., Which they use to create their full-fledged defense and then the same China will grab Siberia for itself - Russia will have to run to Uncle Sam to protect it from cross-eyed.
      1. 0
        23 September 2011 11: 12
        You would at least remember a little bit of isstroi, for example, the domestic wars of 1812, 1941. Why is it that the West suddenly stops in its great desire to liquidate Russia as a power! More and more convinced that you believe everything that they say on the box ..
        You look around the world with your own eyes and not the eyes of corrupt media professionals, Where is our country, where is the USSR, where is Russia that would have any influence in the world? There is nothing! This is not war in your opinion ???
  13. saynu2010
    +1
    22 September 2011 13: 25
    I fully agree with the author of the article. Russia was attacked in 1992. The third world war is underway. Our rulers have lost allies in all directions. The diplomats, led by Lavrov, are kissing everyone on the ass; they have completely lost the authority they acquired in Soviet times. An offensive strategy is needed so that everyone understands that we are a Russian power. Our rulers (Putin, Medvedev and their team) are leading to the abyss. The entire capital was plundered and taken abroad. What kind of Russians are they if their children live and study over the hill? Isles and palaces are being bought up. They themselves come to Russia only on a business trip, to control how much bean has dripped and send it to a bank account beyond the cordon. They have a slogan: "Where is the money, there is the Motherland"
  14. - = 999 = -
    0
    22 September 2011 22: 32
    THE UNION YES BUT NOT WITH OUR BOARD. Unfortunately, we have no prospects. THE AUTHORITY DOES NOT INTEREST IN THE FUTURE COUNTRIES, IF OF COURSE THIS IS NOT ANY SECRET PLAN FOR RESCUING RUSSIA, THERE IS ALSO CONSIDERABLE.
    AND TOTALLY HAVE TO CHOOSE FROM TWO ASH.
    PS, - "The enemy will cry, it was not in vain."

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"