Alexey Chaly remembered the defense of Sevastopol from the “Kiev junta”

18
When Sevastopol rebelled against the junta, which seized power in Ukraine, there was no certainty that the whole Crimea would go beyond the hero city. This was admitted at a press conference in Moscow by the former "people's governor" of Sevastopol, and now the head of the Sevastopol parliament, Alexey Chaly.

Alexey Chaly remembered the defense of Sevastopol from the “Kiev junta”


On the occasion of the anniversary of the “fifth defense of Sevastopol”, he presented the book “Che Guevara arrives in the morning - memories of the separatists”, dedicated to the events of February-March 2014. The authors of the book Vyacheslav Gorelov and Sergey Kodanov, who played an active role in the Russian Spring, were also presented to journalists.

The decision was taken

«History tend to distort, rewrite. To prevent this, a book was written, ”said Chaly. The book consists of documents adopted by the authorities of Sevastopol and Crimea in those fateful days, as well as of the memories of the participants of the defense of Sevastopol against the encroachments of the new Kiev authorities.

“When the Verkhovna Rada adopted a number of laws towards European integration in September, I tried to step up to the top leadership of Russia, but all my attempts to find approaches to the Kremlin were unsuccessful,” recalls Aleksey Chaly, who led the protest of Sevastopol to Russia a year ago.

“I did not torture myself with thoughts and analysis of the worst scenarios. The decision was made, it was necessary to act. We did not have confidence that we would support Simferopol, we were preparing for the defense of Sevastopol. What was planned at that moment in Simferopol did not know. But after two days it became clear that blocking the entire Crimea from the penetration of the Ukrainian security forces would be easier than Sevastopol, ”he added.

Prior to the Maidan and the return spring in Russia, Aleksey Chaly and his associates, who took power at a turning point and formed the coordinating council, had especially peaceful professions - teachers, historians, businessmen.

Chaly headed the Tavrida Electrici industrial group, to which 35 dedicated his life.

The events took place very quickly, the information necessary for making decisions changed every hour, Chaly recalls.

“On February 21, we decided to hold a rally, but what we will say there, it became clear only two hours before it began. Now I’ll be horrified to find out what would happen if we made this or that decision. In general, the thread passed, God's dispensation. Today we carry loud titles that say that our uprising succeeded, otherwise they would have been called “a prisoner of such and such ...”, the head of parliament jokes.

"Few competent people"

According to Alexey Chaly, the return of Sevastopol to Russia did not disappoint the citizens. This affected those who linked economic expectations to the accession to Russia, and this, above all, is a small and medium business in the Crimea and Sevastopol, tied to supplies from Ukraine. Most of the population of the Crimea and Sevastopol, which is related to the public sector, has directly benefited from the transition under Russian jurisdiction, he said.

“We should not forget that 60% of the population received an increase in pensions and salaries in the public sector. As for commercial enterprises, this did not happen - after all, you cannot order them to raise salaries to employees. - noted Chaly. - Plus an external economic blockade. In this sense, 40% is disappointed. The government has very limited opportunities, we do not live in the USSR. There is a large part of the economy tied to people, private businessmen, it is not directly controlled by the state. ”

The former people's governor himself is dissatisfied with the lack of a competent team at the mercy of the city.

“I had no idealistic expectations. Disappointed that few competent people. I would like not to waste time on the internal struggle. As part of our subject, we have spent too much time and effort on this struggle and are just starting to embody our concept of development. ”

From fleet before winemaking

According to Chaly, the budget of Sevastopol by two thirds is unprofitable and even the development of the Black Sea Fleet will not solve this problem, especially since the fleet has never been a city-forming factor. Sanctions limit the activity of Russian companies whose owners are afraid to open branches in Sevastopol.

“We need to talk about a strategic change in the situation - this is the need of the city and the country. We are carefully watched and waited - and what will happen to the regions next? Will they take root? ”The parliamentarian noted.

He is confident that there are quite a few enterprises in Sevastopol that are ready to participate in the import substitution program.

“The Crimea and Sevastopol will overcome their unprofitability in different ways,” says Chaly. “Crimea must regain the glory of the All-Russian health resort, and Sevastopol must remain the base of the Black Sea Fleet and develop high-tech production.”

Other major areas in the development of the city are military-patriotic tourism and elite wine-making, which has centuries-old local traditions. “Limestone soils that give grapes unique in their wine-making properties are located only in the vicinity of Sevastopol,” the politician emphasized.

And above all, Sevastopol is a cultural and historical cluster, because so many historical monuments, from ancient times to the present day, are not found in any Russian city.

“Sevastopol has every right to be considered a symbol of the formation of the Russian state,” says Alexey Chaly, “not only a politician, but also a collector and keeper of Russian cultural traditions.

Facts

Alexey Chaly went down in history as the “people's governor” of Sevastopol. In the past - a Russian entrepreneur, the founder of the company "Tavrida Electric", created on the basis of the research laboratory of switching devices of the Sevastopol instrument-making institute.

Collector and keeper of Russian traditions, the author of several humanitarian, educational and patriotic projects in Sevastopol. On his initiative and with financial support in 2007, in the territory of the 35 coastal battery a museum historical memorial complex was created, tours of which are held free of charge for everyone.

23 February 2014 of the year immediately after the coup in Kiev, in Sevastopol, the rally "People's Will against Fascism in Ukraine" was held, which was attended by about 20 thousand people. The participants adopted a resolution stating that Sevastopol does not recognize the latest decisions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and considers what is happening in the country a coup d'état.

After the head of the Sevastopol administration, Vladimir Yatsuba, called on the protesters to maintain unity with Ukraine, the rally participants elected a new, “people's mayor”. At an extraordinary meeting, the Sevastopol City Council approved Alexey Chaly in the position of the head of the city administration.

1 April 2014, the deputies of the Legislative Assembly of Sevastopol decided that the highest official of the new subject of the Russian Federation would be the Governor of Sevastopol. And voted unanimously for the appointment of Alexei Chaly as the acting governor.

And on April 14, at a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chaly reported that he resigned and. about. Governor and is ready to lead the new structure - the Agency for Strategic Development of Sevastopol.

In September, 2014 took part in the elections to the legislative assembly of Sevastopol, leading the electoral list of the United Russia party, and at the first session of the Sevastopol Legislative Assembly, deputies unanimously elected Alexei Chaly as their chairman.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    21 February 2015 05: 58
    There will be no second Sapun-Mountain, and the city of Russian glory, now certainly for millennia OUR !!!! ...
  2. +8
    21 February 2015 06: 16
    "Legendary Sevastopol,
    Unapproachable to enemies.
    Sevastopol, Sevastopol -
    Pride of Russian sailors "
  3. +2
    21 February 2015 06: 19
    Quote: from article
    According to Chaly, the budget of Sevastopol is two-thirds unprofitable and even the development of the Black Sea Fleet will not solve this problem, especially since the fleet has never been a city-forming factor.


    True ? belay belay belay Never ever ?

    A new stage in the development of land in the South-Western Crimea began after the annexation of the Crimean Khanate to Russia. For a long time, Russia fought for access to the Black Sea. As a result of the outstanding victories of the famous Russian commanders during the Russian-Turkish war of the 1768-1774 years, Russia took possession of the lands of the Northern Black Sea Region and the Sea of ​​Azov. Russian troops invaded Crimea, the Ottoman Empire had to conclude a Kuchuk-Kainajir agreement with Russia, according to which all the conquered lands were transferred to Russia, and the Crimean Khanate gained independence. But Russia's position in the Black Sea region remained extremely fragile.

    To secure its southern borders, Russia had to create a strong fleet in the Black Sea. It was required to find a convenient place to base it. Commander of the Russian troops in Crimea, Lieutenant General A.V. Suvorov proposed the use of the Akhtiar bay (currently Sevastopol) for this purpose.

    In May 1783, a month after the annexation of Crimea to Russia, 5 frigates and 8 of other ships of the Azov flotilla under the command of Admiral Fedot Klokochev, appointed commander of the fleet of the Azov and Black Seas, as well as part of the ships of the Dnieper flotilla under the kosovoy, entered the desert Akhtiar bay Black Sea Sidor Biloy. The arrival of ships was the beginning of the birth of the Black Sea ship fleet (the Black Sea rowing (estuary) flotilla operated on the Black Sea).

    On 3 of June 1783 of the year, sailors descended from the ships to the deserted coast, and the construction of the city and port began. On the western shore of the South Bay, the first stone buildings of the future city were laid: a chapel, the house of the new squadron commander Rear Admiral F.F. Mekkensi, forge, marina.

    On February 10, 1784, by decree of Catherine II, the city was named Sevastopol, which translated from Greek means "a city of glory, a city worthy of worship." The name turned out to be symbolic, repeatedly performing military and labor exploits, Sevastopol proved that it is worthy of its name. The name Akhtiar returned to Sevastopol after the decree of Paul I in 1797 and remained with him until March 29, 1826, when, at the behest of Nicholas I, a Senate decree was issued: "So that the city of Sevastopol should not be called Akhtiar in the future, but always Sevastopol."

    Sevastopol was founded as the main base of the Black Sea Fleet (although the city received this status later) and as a military fortress.
    The first builders of Sevastopol were sailors and soldiers of the Black Sea squadron under the command of Rear Admiral F.F. Mekenzie and F.F. Ushakova.
    The entrance to the bay was protected by coastal fortifications, erected in accordance with the ideas of A.V. Suvorov. For construction work, stones, marble, quarried on the ruins of Chersonesos were used (“The city of Akhtiar,” said Academician P.S. Pallas, who visited Chersonesos and Akhtiar (Sevastopol) in those years, “came from the ruins of ancient Chersonesos”).
    1. +3
      21 February 2015 06: 50
      Quote: Corsair
      Truth ? Never ever ?

      Man is not alive by the fleet alone! laughing
      But seriously, for 23 years the city lived on crumbs from the Black Sea Fleet table. Hence, probably such thoughts. But in general I like Chaly very much, it’s a pity that they pushed me. Another unpleasant nagging with joy for the Crimea. hi
    2. +3
      21 February 2015 07: 22
      Quote: Corsair
      Never ever ?

      Well, actually he’s right, the fleet is a budgetary organization and a consumer of resources, it doesn’t produce anything, another thing is if the enterprise is located on land and it produces a certain product, creating employment for the population, selling the product on the market, thereby supplying the population with something necessary
      1. +3
        21 February 2015 08: 09
        Quote: saag
        Quote: Corsair
        Never ever ?

        Well, actually he’s right, the fleet is a budgetary organization and a consumer of resources, it doesn’t produce anything, another thing is if the enterprise is located on land and it produces a certain product, creating employment for the population, selling the product on the market, thereby supplying the population with something necessary

        Ta-ah-ah .... And the defense enterprises included in the structure of the Black Sea Fleet (Russia now no longer needs to be written lol )? Do "Gaster" work for them, or do Sevastopol citizens? "Babosiki" don't they "drip" into the city budget?
        1. -2
          21 February 2015 08: 21
          Quote: Corsair
          Babosiks "don't they" drip "into the city budget?

          Rather go to the federal budget
          1. +1
            21 February 2015 09: 26
            Quote: saag
            Rather go to the federal budget

            L-a-a-d-no recourse from FEDERAL city ​​- federal subjectis getting something?
            1. +3
              21 February 2015 10: 32
              Quote: Corsair
              L-a-a-d-no, from the FEDERAL, the city is a federal subject, is it getting something?

              D and from the fleet the city receives. The fleet consumes energy, water, takes products - at least partially - through the city structure, officers use apartment shops, etc. In general, part of the funds allocated for the maintenance of the fleet in any way goes to the city budget. And this is in addition to the incoming taxes and subventions from the federal budget. All people who work for the fleet, pensioners who receive money from the federal budget. the budget they spend in the end in the city.
  4. +4
    21 February 2015 06: 51
    Thanks for the truth.
    Alexey Chaly deserves deep respect.
    We remember how it was. Turchinov wanted to take away the right to lease the Black Sea Fleet from Russia. And then Chaly writes in the article what was happening.
    And now, some short-sighted, or maybe just not knowing the essence of the matter, people allow themselves to say that Putin has captured Crimea.
    1. -4
      21 February 2015 07: 23
      Quote: shishakova
      people allow themselves to say that Putin has captured Crimea.

      What did he do?
      1. +1
        21 February 2015 08: 17
        Quote: shishakova
        people allow themselves to say that Putin has captured Crimea.


        Quote: saag
        What did he do?


        He ANNEXED it ... stop , do not "minus" .... It's not me who said so, STE in geyrope say so lol damned am
    2. +4
      21 February 2015 09: 17
      Right Chaly captured the Crimea and naturally transferred it to Putin as the head of Russia. What a low bow to him.
  5. +7
    21 February 2015 07: 19
    Quote: shishakova
    simply not knowing the essence of the matter, people allow themselves to say that Putin captured Crimea

    "Ivans who do not remember kinship" ... hi
    A few facts about the (allegedly) "seizure of Crimea":
    1. Crimea was transferred to the Ukrainian USSR in 1954 by the sole decision of the Secretary General of the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee N. Khrushchev, who, although he was in the highest position in the Soviet hierarchy, the then Constitution of the USSR did not allow him to change the territorial structure of the country.
    2. Sevastopol has always been a city of "union" (now "federal") subordination along with Moscow and Leningrad (now St. Petersburg), which equated it in the status of a "subject" with Crimea. And since the city of Sevastopol was not even mentioned in the document on the transfer of Crimea to the Ukrainian SSR, de facto it remained a part of the USSR. That, however, did not prevent present-day Ukraine from "squeezing" it from the Russian Federation after 1991.
    3. To change the territorial structure of the USSR in accordance with the current Constitution, it was necessary to obtain approval by a majority vote of the Soviets of People's Deputies of the RSFSR and the Ukrainian SSR, which was not even attempted. And even such a question did not arise at their congresses (held regularly).
    So, for those who like to exaggerate the question about "the theft of boots (Crimea) by Russia from Ukraine", you should first find out the answer to a simpler question: where and how did these "boots" appear in Ukraine? ... hi
    1. -5
      21 February 2015 07: 42
      Quote: vtnsk
      Where and how did these "boots" appear in Ukraine?

      From here:
      "Treaty
      about friendship, cooperation and partnership between
      Russian Federation and Ukraine
      Kiev, May 31, 1997
      The Russian Federation and Ukraine, hereinafter referred to as the "High Contracting Parties",
      Based on historically developed close ties, relations of friendship and cooperation between the peoples of Russia and Ukraine,
      Noting that the Treaty between the RSFSR and the Ukrainian SSR of November 19, 1990 contributed to the development of good-neighborly relations between the two states,
      Reaffirming their obligations arising from the provisions of the Agreement between the Russian Federation and Ukraine on the further development of interstate relations, signed in Dagomys on June 23, 1992,
      Considering that the strengthening of friendly relations, good neighborliness and mutually beneficial cooperation meets the fundamental interests of their peoples, serves the cause of peace and international security,
      Desiring to give a new quality to these relations and strengthen their legal basis,
      Determined to ensure the irreversibility and progression of the democratic processes in both states,
      Having regard to the arrangements within the framework of the Commonwealth of Independent States,
      Reaffirming their commitment to the norms of international law, especially the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and following the commitments made within the framework of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, we have agreed as follows:
      Article 1
      The High Contracting Parties as friendly, equal and sovereign states base their relations on mutual respect and trust, strategic partnership and cooperation.
      Article 2
      The High Contracting Parties, in accordance with the provisions of the UN Charter and the obligations of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, respect the territorial integrity of each other and confirm the inviolability of the borders existing between them.
      Article 3
      The High Contracting Parties shall build relations with each other on the basis of the principles of mutual respect, sovereign equality, territorial integrity, inviolability of borders, peaceful settlement of disputes, non-use of force or threat of force, including economic and other methods of pressure, the right of peoples to freely decide their fate, and non-interference in internal cases, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, cooperation between states, conscientious implementation of international obligations, as well as other generally recognized norms of international law.
      Article 4
      The High Contracting Parties proceed from the premise that good neighborliness and cooperation between them are important factors for enhancing stability and security in Europe and around the world. They work closely to strengthen international peace and security. They are taking the necessary measures to contribute to the process of general disarmament, the creation and strengthening of a collective security system in Europe, as well as strengthening the UN peacekeeping role and enhancing the effectiveness of regional security mechanisms.
      The parties make efforts to ensure that the settlement of all disputed problems is carried out exclusively by peaceful means, and cooperate in the prevention and settlement of conflicts and situations affecting their interests. "
      1. +7
        21 February 2015 07: 56
        Quote: saag
        From here:
        "Treaty
        about friendship, cooperation and partnership between
        Russian Federation and Ukraine
        Kiev, May 31, 1997

        In fact, in this agreement there is not a word about Sevastopol. In the USSR there was a unique federal state: 15 union republics with their own division and three cities of union subordination - Moscow, Leningrad and Sevastopol. During the rape of Soz, the status of Sevastopol was never discussed with anyone, it was not the subject of agreements and contracts. Before 1992, Sevastopol was not a part of Ukraine, like Russia. And how he ended up in Ukraine is not clear.
        1. -5
          21 February 2015 08: 06
          Quote: andj61
          In fact, in this agreement there is not a word about Sevastopol.

          In the federal agreement of 1992 http://constitution.garant.ru/act/federative/170280/ it is also not mentioned as that
          1. +4
            21 February 2015 08: 48
            Quote: saag
            In the federal agreement of 1992 http://constitution.garant.ru/act/federative/170280/ it is also not mentioned as that

            Exactly! Therefore, Luzhkov in his time, even under Yeltsin, paid attention to the unresolved issue of Sevastopol's membership. And Sevastopol became part of Ukraine as a region, and it is also unclear how - without any legal justification.
      2. +7
        21 February 2015 08: 36
        Quote: saag
        Where and how did these "boots" appear in Ukraine?
        From here:

        You refer to the Agreement. I confess, I have never read it. Opened. Read. And?

        Ukraine since the signing of the contract from its very first article systemically disturbed him with hostile thoughts. Not to mention the junta. "... on mutual respect and trust, strategic partnership and cooperation.Hmmm! "I did not find an article in the agreement that the Ukrainian side would not have violated. Ukraine did not rely."... on the historical close ties, relations of friendship and cooperation between the peoples of Russia and Ukraine, .."
        In the Dagomys agreements the same song.
        By the way, I did not see there that Sevastopol is Ukraine.
        For me, the return of Crimea is a restoration of historical justice.
        And from the moral and legal side.
        1. -3
          21 February 2015 11: 50
          Quote: There was a mammoth
          By the way, I did not see there that Sevastopol is Ukraine.

          "Article 2
          The High Contracting Parties, in accordance with the provisions of the UN Charter and the commitments under the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, respect each other's territorial integrity and reaffirm the inviolability of the borders existing between them. "

          That is, Sevastopol within the borders of Ukraine, without any other interpretation, and the Russian Federation leased a base from Ukraine, what else is not clear?
          1. 0
            21 February 2015 22: 06
            Quote: saag
            ... what else is incomprehensible?

            Have you heard about the referendum in Crimea? Based on the decision of the referendum Crimea out from Ukraine and asked how independent state into Russia. And they’re not killing there now.
            What's so incomprehensible?
            As Crimea and Sevastopol as a part of Ukraine turned out to be reminded to you by VTNSK at 07:19.
            "The law is that the drawbar is where you turn, it went there." How "legitimately" disappeared the legitimate President of Ukraine is not forgotten? And to what extent is the junta headed by Poroshenko in the "law"? And he is legitimate only as long as the cookies on the Maidan were legal.
            I understand the bitterness of the Ukrainians, but the departure of Crimea is the full merit of the Ukrainians. Now Donbass has been "washed in blood" so that it is also not on the way with modern Ukraine. Surprisingly, in fact, the territorial integrity of Ukraine now rests only on the President of Russia (Article 2). In Ukraine, it seems that they do not understand the simple folk wisdom: "Don't spit in the well ...".
  6. calocha
    +3
    21 February 2015 09: 22
    Meanwhile, a certain activist Elvira Bulat makes statements that are required to interest the investigative committee ... Admire this .. game. wassat
  7. +2
    21 February 2015 09: 27
    Chaly is credible, at least for me, in that, immediately after a brilliantly done business, he gave up power. Is it possible to find such examples in our time? I don’t remember. I remember well the loser of the elections in Astrakhan, who was starving with grief and almost died in the struggle for power. And the winner, a year later sat down for theft and bribes. The motivation is different for Chalov and those who want to break through to the feeder at all costs.
  8. +3
    21 February 2015 10: 08
    A.M. Chaly is the mind, honor and conscience of Sevastopol, Crimea and Russia! It may sound pathetic, but it is. It is a pity that such as A.M. Chaly are units









  9. +5
    21 February 2015 10: 51
    Crimea has always been RUSSIAN I served in Sevastopol 89-92, and I have been going to Crimea since 2005 on vacation, so, according to my personal observations, the attitude towards holidaymakers from the Russian Federation is much better than towards the residents of "pushing them out on a mobile", I will say they were treated more with some contempt And when Crimea joined the Russian Federation, I was just happy, I was so happy since the birth of my son!
  10. 0
    21 February 2015 12: 09
    We still remember Crimean wines with my father !! Sevastopol, 91-92 years old! School of divers! My father came for my birthday. How long has it been !! Like yesterday! drinks
  11. 0
    21 February 2015 12: 32
    Our Crimea !!! Sevastopol is ours !!! Urya urya urya !!!!

    Chaly is a rare person! I have deep respect for him !!!!
  12. 0
    21 February 2015 12: 35
    On the statements of the junta that the Crimea remains the territory of Ukraine and that revenge is being prepared, a warning of Sevastopol people appeared on the Internet.
    “Be warned, if you go to the Crimea, then you will learn what“ Death to the invaders! ” Donetsk militia seem hospitable relatives.
    We in Sevastopol have English, French, Turkish, Italian and German cemeteries. If you do not want the "Ukrainian" to appear, then take a better look at establishing the order in those territories that you still have.
    Do not bother with someone else, leave Donbass alone - he made his choice. And draw new cards. While you still have the opportunity to draw on them a state with the strange name "Ukraine".
    Sevastopol - Kiev. Crimea is dangerous for the health of the junta!
    Crimea is ours. And we will never give it to you again. Played - and waking up. You get to us - wholesale and for constant insults to our country, and for disfigured Kiev, for crushed Odessa and for the killed children of Donbass, and for "Crimea-Ukraine".
    1. -3
      21 February 2015 14: 03
      Quote: Orphan 63
      And we will never give it back to you.

      optimistic I would say, especially if you look at the Crimea in historical terms
  13. 0
    21 February 2015 13: 14
    Quote: saag
    Quote: vtnsk
    Where and how did these "boots" appear in Ukraine?

    From here:
    "Treaty
    about friendship, cooperation and partnership between
    Russian Federation and Ukraine
    Kiev, May 31, 1997
    The Russian Federation and Ukraine, hereinafter referred to as the "High Contracting Parties",
    Based on historically developed close ties, relations of friendship and cooperation between the peoples of Russia and Ukraine,
    Noting that the Treaty between the RSFSR and the Ukrainian SSR of November 19, 1990 contributed to the development of good-neighborly relations between the two states,
    Reaffirming their obligations arising from the provisions of the Agreement between the Russian Federation and Ukraine on the further development of interstate relations, signed in Dagomys on June 23, 1992,
    Considering that the strengthening of friendly relations, good neighborliness and mutually beneficial cooperation meets the fundamental interests of their peoples, serves the cause of peace and international security,
    Desiring to give a new quality to these relations and strengthen their legal basis,
    Determined to ensure the irreversibility and progression of the democratic processes in both states,
    Having regard to the arrangements within the framework of the Commonwealth of Independent States,
    Reaffirming their commitment to the norms of international law, especially the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and following the commitments made within the framework of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, we have agreed as follows:
    Article 1
    The High Contracting Parties as friendly, equal and sovereign states base their relations on mutual respect and trust, strategic partnership and cooperation.
    Article 2
    The High Contracting Parties, in accordance with the provisions of the UN Charter and the obligations of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, respect the territorial integrity of each other and confirm the inviolability of the borders existing between them.
    Article 3
    The High Contracting Parties shall build relations with each other on the basis of the principles of mutual respect, sovereign equality, territorial integrity, inviolability of borders, peaceful settlement of disputes, non-use of force or threat of force, including economic and other methods of pressure, the right of peoples to freely decide their fate, and non-interference in internal cases, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, cooperation between states, conscientious implementation of international obligations, as well as other generally recognized norms of international law.
    Article 4
    The High Contracting Parties proceed from the premise that good neighborliness and cooperation between them are important factors for enhancing stability and security in Europe and around the world. They work closely to strengthen international peace and security. They are taking the necessary measures to contribute to the process of general disarmament, the creation and strengthening of a collective security system in Europe, as well as strengthening the UN peacekeeping role and enhancing the effectiveness of regional security mechanisms.
    The parties make efforts to ensure that the settlement of all disputed problems is carried out exclusively by peaceful means, and cooperate in the prevention and settlement of conflicts and situations affecting their interests. "

    Pay attention to the keywords - everywhere the word and spirit are FRIENDLY !!!
    No friendship no contract! Let the states give them friendship Alaska, Florida ...
    1. -2
      21 February 2015 14: 01
      Quote: Thompson
      No friendship no contract!

      While the agreement has not been denounced by any party, it is valid, all these conversations about friendship are emotions, someone in the Duma tried to submit the denunciation of this agreement, but the initiative somehow quickly went out, why should it? :-)
      1. 0
        21 February 2015 22: 32
        No, the contract is not valid. He ended his action since the revolution / coup in Kiev. The same phenomenon opened the way for the residents of Crimea to self-determination. They decided. You can wipe this agreement with you, as you wiped it with the Constitution of Ukraine.
  14. 0
    21 February 2015 14: 41
    If we had more patriots like Chaly in Russia! The country would be different! After all, what is happening in our economy is grabbing, sometimes with a clear violation of any existing laws and taking them abroad, to offshore, and then ourselves to run over the hill! When figures are given, how many such businessmen, officials and hedgehogs with them have fled and live in London alone (and not only in it)
    you understand what funds and assets are withdrawn from the country, you can’t even remember about patriotism ..! ???
    A rather large category of people has appeared in our country from among government officials, business, and intelligentsia who perceive Russia as a place of enrichment, but not as their homeland, fatherland, desire to make and contribute to the development of our society, to be a support to the state!
    The economic theory of the development of the state, used today by liberals of all stripes, provides the basis and leads to such embezzlement of the state budget that you simply wonder where we are going! .. ???
    Crimeans returned home and we can only be glad that they have such patriots as Chaly, Aksyonov, etc.
    This is what to do with our false patriots, who are so eager for the West and the USA, and so on, and this is not an idle question, so you can fuck your house-Russia! So far, Putin has no power in power, but who knows how those who succeed him will behave (he is not eternal, even by age). And God forbid, any new Gorbachev or Yeltsin will come, with their consensus and drunkenness, I'm not talking about opposition traitors such as Kosyanov, Mitrokhin, etc. !? We would have more Chalykh and Rutsky in power, but fewer swamp traitors !!