The Chinese Navy received the sixth and last destroyer of the project 052С

The Chinese Navy 9 February received the 6-th and the last in the Xian series destroyer of the 052С project (153 tail number), built on the new Shanghai shipyard Shanghai Jiangnan Changxing Shipbuilding and Heavy Industry Corporation (part of the state-owned China Shipbuilding State Corporation) . This is reported by the blog. bmpd.

“The last Chinese destroyer of the 052С Xi'an project (“ Xi'an ”, 西安, the“ 153 ”airborne number has not yet been applied).” Photo taken at test stage in August 2014 of the year. ”

The first two ships were transferred the fleet in 2004 and 2005 They were built on the old site of the shipyard. Further, the construction was stalled due to the completion of a new weapons complex. The third ship was launched only in 2010 at the new shipyard. The final Xi'an series was launched in 2012 and was included in the Eastern Fleet only this year.

Further development of this type of ships became destroyers of the project 052D. The lead destroyer of this project, Kunmin, was commissioned in March 2014. The second and third ships (Chansha and Guiyang) are now undergoing sea trials. At present, at least 6 052D destroyers of the XNUMXD project destroyers are still under construction in Chinese shipyards.

Comments

[insafufa]

Here are the Chinas stamping It remains only to envy

[Kostyar]

Yes, the Chinese have seriously dispersed ...., spank, what hot cakes !!!

[Duke]

052C type destroyers (Lanzhou type destroyers, NATO designation - Luyang-II) - a series of six Chinese destroyers. The first ships in the Navy of the People’s Republic of China with air defense systems providing zonal air defense and having highly integrated combat systems, a multifunctional radar with a headlamp and a vertical missile launch installation.
The design of the ship is based on a modular concept. The destroyer hull of the previous type 052B was used. The height of the superstructure is increased to accommodate four stationary headlights of a multifunctional radar.
Propulsion system - combined diesel-gas turbine (CODOG), consists of two Ukrainian-made DA80 / DN80 gas turbine engines with a total capacity of 48 600 hp and two Shaanxi diesels (Chinese copy of the MTU 20V956TB92 diesel engine) with a total capacity of 8840 l.
On ships of this type, 8 Chinese-designed HHQ-9 vertical launch modules are installed on each 6 anti-aircraft missile (total of 48 missiles). Six modules are located in the bow of the ship in front of the superstructure, the other two in the aft part of the superstructure above the helicopter hangar.
The overview and target designation for an air defense system provides the main multifunctional radar, tracking and target illumination in the X-band - a small radar with a headlamp located on the roof of the superstructure next to the aft UVP modules
Anti-ship weapons are represented by Chinese-made YJ-62 (C-602) missiles. located in the middle of the ship. Missiles are controlled using the Band Stand radar installed in the front of the superstructure above the navigation bridge and the Light Bulb radar located in front of the helicopter hangar.
The main caliber is a 100-mm universal fully automatic single-barrel installation made in China. The installation is designed for firing at ground and air targets, including subsonic cruise missiles. Rate of fire is 90 rds / min. The installation can operate in a fully automatic mode based on radar data, an optical sighting system, or in manual mode.
The ship is armed with two 30-mm fast-firing seven-barreled short-range artillery mounts of the 730 type with a firing range of up to 3 km and a rate of fire of 4600-5800 rds / min.
The main anti-submarine weapon is a three-pipe Italian torpedo launcher for anti-submarine torpedoes and an 12-barrel rocket launcher of the 75 type.
In the aft part of the destroyer, there is a landing pad and a hangar for the Ka-28 anti-submarine helicopter.
The destroyer is armed with a new Chinese electronic countermeasure system with a phased array radar for passive and active signal suppression.

[gjv]

Quote: Duke

The main anti-submarine weapon is a three-pipe Italian torpedo tube for anti-submarine torpedoes

Two (left and right side) of the three-pipe 324-mm torpedo tubes ET52-C. In this photo - the installation of the TA on the frigate F-22P on board, closer to the stern, as was the case with the predecessors of Luyang-II - destroyers of project 052 Luhu. On the new Luyang-II, TAs are installed in front of the wheelhouse (in the photo above, white rectangles against a gray side).
Torpedo Yu-7 (analogue of American Mark 46 Mod. 2) of active / passive acoustic homing [Diameter 324 mm; length 2,6 m; weight 235 kg; Warhead 45 kg; power plant Otto-II; range 7,3 km; speed> 47 knots (87 km / h); depth> 400 m].
Torpedo ET52 (analogue of the Italian Alenia A244-S) active / passive acoustic homing [Diameter 324 mm; length 2,6 m; weight 235 kg; Warhead 34 kg; electric power unit; range 6,0 km; speed of 30 knots (56 km / h)].

[Giant thought]

The Chinese hope to seriously compete with the U.S. Navy in the Asia-Pacific region, and therefore stamped warships of various classes to protect their transport communications in the southern seas from mattresses in the event of a conflict with the United States.

[Arberes]

Quote: Thought Giant

The Chinese hope to seriously compete with the US Navy in the Asia-Pacific region

I don’t know seriously or not, but it’s a severe necessity for the Celestial. In addition to the United States, China has difficult relations with Japan (its Navy is also actively developing), relations with South Korea are also strained, and Vietnam is again. Large maritime border and many disputed maritime territories.
In general, I am happy for the Chinese, I myself do not fully understand why ??? But glad!

[yehat]

The Chinese need a fleet primarily to protect their trade interests.
(India, the Red Sea, the coast of Africa, Japan, Hong Kong, Vietnam, etc.)
and only in the second is there some sort of rivalry or disputed territory.

[Decathlon]

Handsome men, what do you say! I have three possible versions of why this is not happening with us:
1. We have many times less numbers.
2. Our hands are growing out of the ass.
3. They are shot for embezzlement.
I don’t know which one to stop at ....

[lelikas]

Quote: Decathlon

I don’t know which one to stop at ....

1 There was no money.
2 There was no desire.
3 Did not modify the mat.chast.
More or less eliminating the first three, we got the following
4 Turbines, cables and all that came from Ukraine ended.

Well, we are building them.

[g1v2]

Our project of a new generation destroyer has not yet been completed. Project "leader" by what is already known represents a middle ground between a classic destroyer and a missile cruiser. It is not yet 22 percent clear, but it looks like the power plant will still be nuclear. According to the MO, 6 units will be built before the age of 16, although earlier they threatened almost XNUMX. But the development dragged on and the planned number was reduced. In general, there are more rumors and announcements about the leader, as well as about the armature, than the real information, it is not even clear at what stage the project is now. However, in the state program it costs and money is also provided.

[Stirbjorn]

We have, for example, the Admiralty Shipyards, and so they successfully rivet "Varshavyanka" earlier for China, Vietnam and Algeria, now for the Black Sea Fleet - 2 last year, 2 should this. Displacement 4 kilotons, similar to our frigates under construction. At the same time, they also do not forget about export, and in parallel for the Vietnamese, and later the Algerians are built. The deadlines are not disrupted, everything is fast and on time - maybe it comes out with us! But the frigates of project 11356R / M, it would seem, have already been worked out on the Indians - 3 pieces of the Yantar Kaliningrad built, but for us they are again delaying. I am not talking about the Far East at all - in St. Petersburg the Stoyky corvette was laid six months later than the Amur one, Perfect, in the summer of 2014 it entered the fleet - and its Far Eastern brother has not even been launched yet! The project is the same, the money is the same

[Stirbjorn]

I'm for 3 option! In the Northern Shipyards for the last 3 years, is the third CEO! They pushed the previous two for theft - where does it fit ?! And there, by the way, our frigates and corvettes are being built.

[RosUkrBel]

And the number is in order and hands as it should, but the shooting would not hurt.

[lelikas]

Quote: RosUkrBel

And the number is in order and hands as it should, but the shooting would not hurt.

This is not productive - in Siberia and the Far East, there are many minerals that need to be mined.

[patriot of Russia]

insafufa SU Today, 11:13 AM

Here are the chinas stamping good can only be envied


C'mon, they won’t be equal to us anyway! But the main thing is not in iron ... better than a Russian warrior noble, courageous, kind and compassionate on earth! so what difference will they have on one ship more or not?

[_Alexei_]

this is speed like hot cakes

[nebalagur]

That way they will soon be kicked out of the Pacific Ocean.

[Barakuda]

With such a pace, we can only hope that the Russian and the Chinese are "brothers" forever.

[Velesovich]

Mdaaa ... Against the backdrop of the Chinese, it is even somehow embarrassing to recall that we are building miserable corvettes for 5-8 years :( There is something to think about.

[DEDEDE]

China does not threaten anyone, it only silently arming itself.

[vaaaaadik]

do not forget that this is still "made in china" that is, there is quantity but no quality)))

[Fin]

Quote: vaaaaadik

do not forget that this is still "made in china" that is, there is quantity but no quality)))

You first read his performance characteristics, and then you will giggle.

[yehat]

You are confusing cheap junk for cattle from China, which are driven by our traders and their state. industry. On state. enterprises in their quality control is not an empty phrase.

[Aleksandr69]

Oh no, we can do paper fast too ... Does anyone know anything about the quality of the Chinese industrial trade? Have you seen their products in business?

[kr33sania]

Yes, not bad Chinese ships are riveting now. And they have no less than 100 (a hundred!) Shipyards. And there are many technologies for the production of modern technology. And their warlords are not the last. So to belittle them - then it will be more expensive for yourself! We need to build our own shipyards and ships more. Such a time!

[DEDEDE]

Quote: Alexander69

Oh no, we can do paper fast too ... Does anyone know anything about the quality of the Chinese industrial trade? Have you seen their products in business?

Chinese products can be of different qualities, for their own army they will not be able to produce paper vessels, they put packs of people against the wall for less offense.

[Seaman77]

Bulk carriers, container ships for MSC and LNG gas carriers, which today are the most high-tech civilian vessels, are being built at the same factory. Strongly doubt the poor quality.

[Abbra]

Another thorn in the ass of the US Navy!

[starshina pv]

we should ... Ah ... a plaque is a fly ..

[Nissa-on]

Chinese products can be of different qualities, for their own army they will not be able to produce paper vessels, they put packs of people against the wall for less offense.

Well I do not know I recall last year’s tank biathlon.
The Chinese were the only ones to perform on their tank and had a sip of problems with the tracks. The reason is steel ... th. Well, they can’t boil high-quality steel in China, unlike Japan

[kr33sania]

Here they tested their tanks. I give a tooth that in a year - three THEM tanks with tracks and other imperfections will have no problems. The Chinese draw conclusions quickly.

[Nissa-on]

Pity the tooth ... The fact itself says a lot. That the Chinese have no polygons? Such a "joint" was shown to the whole world. A ship is more complicated than a tank.

[vaaaaadik]

may they never have weapons better than ours, all their weapons are pathetic copies

[yehat]

but with the shooting they were all right.

[Anton Gavrilov]

With the accumulated ukro-turbines, by the way, the Chinese wrapped them here too.

[UNFAMILIAR]

Quote: Anton Gavrilov

With the accumulated ukro-turbines, by the way, the Chinese wrapped them here too.

Oh, you see the "wanna be Orly Burke" PAR on the superstructure? Once the "professor" exhibited her image as something unattainable by our shipbuilders, and so they are on the Chinese, if I'm not mistaken, our "Leninets"

[Kaetani]

It seems that the main aspect of success is that the shooting was not canceled))))
And so you can only envy.
There are two pluses to the development of the Chinese fleet.
1. Mattress headache.
2. We have a strong incentive to pull ourselves together and raise the fleet and Pacific Fleet in the first place.

[Seaman77]

Here he is at the wall. No. 153. Nearby is another but still without a number. The photo was taken on January 17. The quality is not very - filmed on a mobile phone, and it was far away.

[dobrjak]

Another headache for the 6th US fleet.

[Kirzhak]

And where does the 6th fleet?

The Sixth Fleet of the United States (Eng. United States Sixth Fleet) - the operational association of the US Navy in Europe. The headquarters is located in Naples.

Where is China and where is Naples.

[KIL]

Here I look at the Chinese, and in my head the question is x .. they need us to guard the channel.

[yehat]

you do not understand. Russia is an authority, especially in the military sphere.
China has no such authority. Chinese soldiers have no authority.
Sometimes it’s not the combat readiness, not the number that matters, but authority.
It is significant how the British Empire skillfully used it.

[KIL]

Maybe so, willingly believe. But thoughts creep in, and we did not invest in the channel, the Kremlin is simply embarrassed to say, and the Chinese nation is silent.

[Seaman77]

another photo closer

[Nayhas]

Quote: Seaman77

another photo closer

Shanghai?

[Seaman77]

Shanghai on the other side

The very first plant on the Yangtze river. Climbed the river 400 miles to Nanjing. I don't know how many shipyards there are, but I think the count goes to hundreds ... I asked the pilots - you just shrugged your shoulders: "A lot ..."

[msm]

Build because there is no corruption. To build you need Stalin.

[Goblin 28]

Raise your hand, who worked on a Chinese-built ship? If anyone has worked, he knows what it is !!! Somehow I happened to be on a tanker of 50 thousand displacement, 2014, owned by the Danes from "Mayersk". This is the worst steamer in my entire 34-year marine career! It is made obscene, sloppy, ill-considered, something breaks all the time, every day you expect a breakdown. Unloading when all the main systems and mechanisms are working is a complete nightmare! And last winter we were pulled for 2 weeks in tow across the winter North Atlantic to New York due to a breakdown of the main engine, made under license in China - by the MAN Burmeister company, by the way! None of the sailors speaks well of the "Chinese"! Now "Mayersk" offers long-term contracts for senior officers on tankers - "Chinese" - captain - from 82 thousand euros per year - 72 days. at sea / 72 days on the shore! But ... better on "Koreans" 10-15 years old. Their construction quality is incomparable with the Chinese!

[Nissa-on]

Quote: yehat

but with the shooting they were all right.

So the little nuances began to appear.

In general, the main thing is that China does not have a new battle with Yalu