The project of mobile courier rocket complex

33
Several decades ago, work began in the Soviet Union on the subject of mobile ground-based missile systems (PGRK), intended for arming strategic missile forces. It was believed that such systems, going on patrol routes, could remain safe and sound after a potential enemy’s nuclear-missile strike by moving away from potentially dangerous areas. Work on the promising direction gave the expected result. As a result, several types of PGRK are still in service with the Strategic Missile Forces of Russia, and in the future new similar systems are likely to appear.

In the early eighties at the Moscow Institute of Thermal Engineering (MIT) one of the new projects of the mobile ground-based missile complex was launched. According to some information, it was originally called Temp-SM, but later received a new designation - 15P159 "Courier". It is under this name that the project entered history domestic rocket technology. The Courier Project was a response to the Midgetman American program. Since 1983, American specialists have been developing a mobile missile system armed with an intercontinental ballistic missile with a range of at least 10 thousand km. An important feature of the Midgetman project was the limitations on the size and launch weight of the rocket. The latter, in the state ready for launch, should have weighed no more than 15-17 t.


This is exactly the unit that was tested. The only thing that is corrected in the photo - his number is removed


21 July 1983 of the year issued a decree of the USSR Council of Ministers, according to which MIT had to develop a missile system with similar characteristics. Restrictions on the size and launch weight of the rocket, while complicating the development, could have a number of positive consequences. Studies have shown that a relatively small rocket can be used not only with mine launchers or machines based on special chassis. The carriers of the product "Courier" could become special automotive semi-trailers or containers of standard sizes and trains. In addition, the transportation of missiles by military transport aircraft was facilitated.

The initiator and one of the main supporters of the new project was Commander of the Strategic Missile Forces V.F. Tolubko. The head of the “Courier” project was A.D. Nadiradze In 1987, his place was taken by B.N. Lagutin. The Votkinsk Machine-Building Plant was involved in the project, which first had to build the required number of experienced rockets, and then master the mass production of new products. Tests and the start of mass production of the Kurier missile complexes were planned for the beginning of the nineties.

The main element of the complex was to be an intercontinental ballistic missile 15Ж59 "Courier". The specific requirements for this product forced MIT and related organizations to conduct a large amount of research and testing, to master new materials and technologies. So, it is known that the newest composite materials were widely used in the design of the rocket body, and the instrumentation equipment had to be built on the basis of the most modern element base. Thus, the Courier missile system could be considered a representative of a new generation of systems of its class.


Tests on the stand side stability CO-100


According to a number of sources, the 15ЖХNNXX rocket was to be built in a three-stage scheme with a separate breeding stage. All stages of the product were supposed to be equipped with solid-fuel rocket engines using a new type of fuel. In the design of the engines, in order to reduce their dimensions, the nozzles partially recessed into the body could be used. In the head part there should have been a stage of breeding with a payload.

Rocket "Courier" was obtained uniquely compact. Its length did not exceed 11,2 m, and the maximum case diameter was 1,36 m. In the early stages of the project, it was supposed to “fit” the starting weight at 15 t, but later it had to be increased to 17 t. The drop weight was about 500 kg. The 15ЖХ59 missile was supposed to carry a monoblock warhead with a nuclear warhead of no more than 150 kt.

For guidance, the Courier rocket was supposed to use an inertial guidance system, made on the basis of a modern element base. As the controls could be used rotary nozzles of the engines and the grating rudders of the first stage.

According to reports, despite the small weight and size, the promising intercontinental missile "Courier" was supposed to deliver a warhead to a range of 10-11 thousand km. The circular deviation should not exceed 350-400 m.




At the factory, the rocket had to be loaded into a transport-launch container, which was supposed to be mounted on the lifting mechanisms of a self-propelled launcher. The launcher itself was proposed to be built on the basis of a special multi-axle chassis with the corresponding characteristics. During the development of the project, the appearance of the chassis was constantly changing. In the complex "Courier" could use the chassis with three, four and five axles. According to one source, it was first suggested to use the 6x6 chassis, but then, due to certain difficulties, it was necessary to develop and integrate machines with a more complex chassis into the complex. According to others, the first appeared six-axle (!) Chassis, after the design of which there was a proposal to reduce the base machine by several wheel pairs.

Since almost all the documentation for the “Courier” project is still classified, it is difficult to say which version corresponds to reality. Both versions seem plausible, since all the chassis, mentioned in the context of the “Courier” project, were really developed and tested. So, it was proposed to make a six-axle mobile launcher based on the MAZ-7916 chassis, a five-axis one based on the MAZ-7929, a four-axis one - the MAZ-7909.

Sources describing a consistent decrease in the number of axles provide some details of this process. So, initially the units of the Courier complex were to be mounted on the basis of the MAZ-7916, but already at the beginning of 1985, it was proposed to use a promising five-axle chassis, which did not exist yet. In the spring of the same year they proposed to develop the 6x6 and 8x8 chassis, and in April 86-nd decided to build a four-axle chassis. However, such a machine did not fully meet the requirements of the military, which is why at the beginning of 1988, they decided to build a launcher based on the five-axle MAZ-7929. This machine has received an index 15У160М.

Fluctuations with the choice of the base chassis affected the timing of the development of the launcher. The five-axle machine project was completed only in 1991, after which MAZ supplied the necessary equipment to Volgograd’s Barricades, where they were to install a set of special equipment.

Special attention deserves a special version of the complex "Courier", intended for the hidden transfer of missiles in a given area. The small weight and dimensions of the product allowed the rocket to be placed in a specially equipped standard cargo container or automobile semi-trailer. Such a self-propelled launcher could, without attracting attention, move throughout the country and, in the case of receiving an order, to launch.

The MAZ-6422 truck tractor and the MAZ-9389 semi-trailer were chosen as the base for the camouflaged modification of the complex. An interesting fact is that the development of the “automotive” modification of the new missile complex began shortly after the start of the project and the bulk of the work was carried out long before the final selection of the chassis for the mobile launcher of the “classical” type.

Already in September, the 1984 of the year at the test site in Bronnitsy (Moscow region) carried out preliminary tests of the proposed tractor and trailer. At the end of the first stage of testing, the truck was distilled into the Gomel region, where for a long time he traveled along local routes. The testing ground was the Leningrad-Kiev-Odessa route (with two bridges), Minsk-Gomel and Bryansk-Gomel-Kobrin.

During the tests, experts collected various information about the operation of the machine’s units, its characteristics, as well as the resulting loads on objects in the semi-trailer, etc. According to the test results, a list of requirements for the equipment that was supposed to be transported in an automobile semi-trailer was formed. The collected data were actively used in the development of the 15Ж59 rocket and other elements of the promising missile system.

According to some sources, the modification of the rocket complex on the basis of a civilian tractor with a semi-trailer remained at the stage of preliminary research. The creation of such a version of the Courier complex was associated with a number of specific problems. In particular, there were no communication and control systems with the necessary characteristics that could be mounted on a civilian truck.

The Courier missile, regardless of the type of base chassis, was supposed to start from the transport-launch container attached to the lifting mechanisms of the self-propelled launcher. As in the case of other domestic intercontinental missiles, it was proposed to use the so-called. cold start using a powder pressure accumulator. After exiting the container and lifting to a certain height, the rocket had to turn on the first-stage engine and go to the target.

In March, the first experienced courier missiles, which had a simplified design and equipment, were delivered to the Plesetsk test site in March. These products were to be used in the course of throwing tests, the purpose of which was to check and test the units of the launcher and the ones responsible for starting the automation. The first launch was launched in March of 1989. Such tests continued until May 1989. A total of 90 throws were performed.

In 1990, experts from MIT and related enterprises continued to develop the project. At the same time they had to wait for the completion of work on the mobile launcher based on a special chassis. Build the latest began only in 1991 year. In the middle of 92, it was planned to complete the preparation of all units of the Courier complex and conduct the first flight tests of the new rocket. However, in October 1991, literally a couple of months before the collapse of the Soviet Union, the project was closed. The reasons for this were the economic situation in the country, the change in the political situation in the international arena, and the cancellation of the development of the American Midgetman project.

The project of the mobile soil rocket complex 15P159 Courier with the 15Zh59 rocket was closed. Nevertheless, developments on this system did not disappear. In the nineties, the Moscow Institute of Heat Engineering was actively working on a number of promising missile technology projects for the Strategic Missile Forces and the naval fleet. These or those nodes, assemblies and technologies are used in Topol-M, Bulava, etc. rockets. For example, the Courier lightweight small-sized missile control system is used on the Start launch vehicle, the operation of which lasted from 1993 to 2006. Thus, the Courier project did not lead to the appearance of the PGRK of the same name, but to a certain extent helped with the creation of new weapons.


On the materials of the sites:
http://rusarmy.com/
http://dancomm.ru/
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/
http://arms-expo.ru/
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-442.html
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    12 February 2015 07: 59
    It is a pity that they did not bring to mind. An interesting weapon would turn out. Almost completely autonomous. Although the load on the team of three people, especially psychological, is simply prohibitive.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +13
      12 February 2015 08: 26
      Quote: Free Wind
      It is a pity that they did not bring to mind. An interesting weapon would turn out. Almost completely autonomous.

      They bring to mind: "The missiles of the Club-K complex."



      1. +8
        12 February 2015 08: 59
        Quote: Boris55
        They bring to mind: "The missiles of the Club-K complex."

        Do not confuse an intercontinental missile and a cruise missile - different ranges, however. The "Club-k" range is up to 350 km.
        1. 0
          12 February 2015 10: 05
          Quote: inkass_98
          Do not confuse an intercontinental missile and a cruise missile - different ranges, however. The "Club-k" range is up to 350 km.

          Well, the development didn’t sink into the summer. Got a new life in a new guise.
          In my opinion it looks pretty decent.
          And intercontinental ones are "Poplars" ...
        2. +7
          12 February 2015 11: 59
          Quote: inkass_98
          The "Club-k" range is up to 350 km.

          "Caliber" - for the Russian Navy has a range of 2500 km, its export version is "Club" :)
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. -1
            12 February 2015 16: 21
            Quote: Rus2012
            "Caliber" - for the Russian Navy has a range of 2500 km

            does not have.

            while projects / projects.
            RCC alone with such a launch mavssa and with such a warhead, and NOT from air carrier-DO NOT ENSURE THIS RANGE


            Quote: Rus2012
            its export version is "Club" :)

            and Caliber and Club is the missile launcher of the RCC.
            Caliber for domestic, Club for export

            "Caliber-M" (export designation "Club-M")

            Functionally complex Club-K comprises Universal Launch Module (USM), Combat Command Module (MOBU), and Power Supply and Life Support Module (MEP).


            And on frigate Talvar Indian Navy



            And on ours. USE ONE and the same anti-ship missiles
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +3
              12 February 2015 20: 34
              Quote: opus
              And on ours. USE ONE and the same anti-ship missiles



              Loading TPK, presumably from the "Caliber" missile launcher, into the 3R14UKSK launcher at the "Grad Sviyazhsk" MRK, project 21361. Probably the photo was taken in Astrakhan in the summer of 2013. Published on 01.08.2013/XNUMX/XNUMX (http://forums.airbase.ru).

              Complex "Caliber-NK", PU 3R14UKSK, equipped with KR 3M-14K. TTX in the open press - no. The estimated range for ground targets is 2500 km.
              ... previously wrote about the possibility of using "Caliber" -
              - The Caspian Flotilla already has a watchdog of the 11661 project “Dagestan”, there will be a “City of Sviyazh”. Both are armed with conventional missiles, but there are plenty of them, as none of the potential adversaries has the means to counter them. And with the long-range "Caliber", the Caspians are able to cover targets in all adjacent territories and in the Black Sea. We will also be able to promptly transfer the Buyans from one sea to another and vice versa, the representative of the Navy’s commissariat said.

              Cruise missiles are located in vertical launchers in the superstructure of the ship immediately behind the mast. The design does not provide means for the issuance of target designations, instead of them there are so-called universal firing ship systems that provide guidance to the target from other sources. It can be reconnaissance aircraft, other ships, orbiting satellites.

              The representative of the Navy’s commander-in-chief didn’t name the potential targets of “Buyan” with the “Ipenel”, but Vladimir Zakharov, rear-admiral in retirement, willingly did this.

              - 21631 missile ships significantly expand the fleet's influence over the entire Caspian region. We must not forget about Iran and the situation around it, which is always unstable. If you shoot Caliber in a southerly direction, you will get well who you need, ”the admiral told Izvestia.

              Thus, the latest frigates of the Admiral Gorshkov type and the small missile ships of the Buyan-M type being built for the Black Sea Fleet and the Caspian Flotilla have identical missile weapons. We are talking about the Caliber missile system with a range of ground targets of more than 2 thousand km, which is several times the range of Soviet systems that are in service with the Navy.

              http://topwar.ru/21941-rossiya-gotovitsya-k-voyne.html

              Launch of the Kalibr-NK complex missile from the Grad Sviyazhsk MRK, pr.21361, 2013-2014
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. -2
                12 February 2015 21: 13
                Quote: Rus2012
                TPK loading presumably

                So what? IT WHAT PROVES?
                Caliber is for "us", and "Club" is for them?
                Caliber and Club are missile systems.
                Quote: Rus2012
                Complex "Caliber-NK",


                Website manufacturer-LOOK. Weapons Program of the Russian Federation -LOOK.




                the rest is incompetent speculation.
                Quote: Rus2012
                TTX in the open press - no. Estimated range for ground targets is 2500km.


                Someone "assigned" an extra "0" in terms of range. This stupid correspondent said 2000 km, and someone threw another "500 km"

                and someone threw another "500 km"



                Quote: Rus2012
                http://topwar.ru/21941-rossiya-gotovitsya-k-voyne.html

                "Is Russia preparing for war?"
                Possibly. And how can this be "tied" to the 2500 km range?

                the author has Pavel Olkhovikov — there is generally a wine salad, and the source is http://www.profile.ru/
                =================================
                such anti-ship missiles (2500km) - PRAISED, and pushed, not hidden
                1. +2
                  12 February 2015 22: 28
                  Quote: opus
                  the rest is incompetent speculation.

                  Do you see the letter "E" in all your materials?
                  This means "export". And for export, weapons with a range of more than 300 km are prohibited.
                  The difference between "export" and for our own use in our case (as well as "Iskander-E" from the letter "M" - for our army) in the control system and the amount of fuel ...

                  Although the North Koreans and Iraqis have always bypassed this by "squeezing" all supplies from our equipment. An example is R-17, then Bish "Scud", which eventually became their space carrier.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                  2. -2
                    12 February 2015 23: 14
                    Quote: Rus2012
                    Do you see the letter "E" in all your materials?

                    Of course, find "from now"! (RF) without E?

                    Quote: Rus2012
                    This means "export".

                    NO!
                    1. 91P anti-submarine missilesЭ1 and 91РТЭ2 complexes "Caliber-PLE" and "Caliber-NKE"

                    374 systemЭC24 - ground test equipment of propulsion systems RN 14A14 SK = also "Export"?
                    and 373СЭ07 - a set of guaranteed power supply equipment (KOGE) UTK KGCh RKN Soyuz-2 371TA41? Or 15Э348 - secret communications switch?
                    2. Find without "E"?
                    Our shoot export modifications?


                    2013g Photos appeared on the Internet as Chinese sailors caught the wreckage of the 3M-54E anti-ship missile/ 3M54E?

                    - The length of the rocket 3M54E with the launch booster 8,22 meters
                    -3M54 rocket length without launch booster 7,34 meters
                    -Rocket length 3М54Э1 и 3М14 together with the starting accelerator 7,2 meter
                    - The length of the rocket 3М54E1 and 3М14 without the launch accelerator 6,2 meter

                    У E1 measurements lessadaptation to NATO TA and TPK, but not at "E"




                    3. Could it be "E" ("E") means place of production? Ekaterinburg?
                    1. 0
                      12 February 2015 23: 37
                      Quote: opus
                      374 systemЭС24 - ground test equipment of propulsion systems РН 14А14 SK = also "Export"? А 373СЭ07

                      and "E" in many cases - to the equipment intended for export - has nothing to do! See GRAU indices.

                      2. No one claims that the Russian Armed Forces NEVER will not use machinery from the export line. An example is the Migi returned by Algeria.
                      But, what is sent for export has significant differences from what is created for oneself. And sometimes, the same better quality than yourself. An example of "tropical performance" for countries with hot climates, when all coatings are better protected against corrosion or even made of stainless material.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. -1
                        13 February 2015 01: 15
                        Quote: Rus2012
                        See GRAU indices.

                        Well, what's the problem?
                        give the index GRAU on the PKR 3M54 (E), since you "read" them.
                        ?
                        What's the catch? Why wasted crushing a mortar?
                        note "E" is not the index "GRAU"

                        Quote: Rus2012
                        No one claims that the Russian Armed Forces NEVER

                        show me RCC (in question) which use the RF VS, without the "E" index
                        Oh yes. still with a range of 2500km is desirable
                        Quote: Rus2012
                        when all coverings are

                        nonsense.
                        1.Humidity in St. Petersburg, Len.obl. and Far East, in comparison with India, at least
                        2. "Tropical" is the temperature range:
                        - rubber, not frost-resistant, shopping mall is cheaper
                        -steel, non-frost resistant, cheaper
                        - fuels and lubricants, not frost-resistant, shopping mall cheaper
                        3.A significant differences: land and sea (for the Navy), tkt here in okiyan "corrosion"
        3. 0
          13 February 2015 17: 14
          This is the export.
          There you can put the TPK with the R-500, or with Caliber
          Already completely different ranges will be (it is clear that not intercontinental, but - "Eurostrategic")
      2. +1
        12 February 2015 12: 39
        in terms of camouflage, the idea is excellent, tens of thousands of trucks move or stand at thousands of parking lots, and among the trucks conditionally several dozen special trucks can inflict an instant blow at the enemy, I also propose to place cruise missiles on special "civilian" aircraft based on the superjet and that -200, there are thousands of civilian aircraft in the air of the Russian Federation and imagine that some of them are carrying cruise missiles, ready to instantly respond to the "global" strike of amers
        1. 0
          12 February 2015 16: 17
          The "Carcasses" and "Surzhiks" have neither bomb bays nor cargo ramps, through which the "evacuation" of ICBMs was once planned.

          Converting civilian airliners into ICBM carriers is both super-expensive and pointless. Tracking down the “strange” downtime routes of an extremely limited number of pseudo-civilian air carriers against the background of regular and predictable civilian airliners, especially thousands of wagons or trucks, is an extremely simple task.

          Py.Sy. If it's not a secret, what is a Tu-200 ???
    3. +2
      12 February 2015 11: 53
      Quote: Free Wind
      It’s a pity that they didn’t bring to mind

      ... that's what actually came to the end -

      A hypothetical image of the ICBM 15Zh59 / RSS-40 "Courier" - SS-X-26 and variants of the SPU complex 15P159 "Courier" (c) http://militaryrussia.ru, the originals of the chassis drawings are taken from http://ruzhany.narod.ru ...


      MAZ-7909 chassis at the Utyos test site of the Minsk Automobile Plant, 1988 (http://www.offroadvehicle.ru).

      TTX missiles:
      Length - 11.2 m
      Case Diameter - 1.36 m

      Starting weight:
      - about 15000 kg (initial stage of the project)
      - about 17000 kg (final version of the project)
      Thrown weight - 500 kg

      Range - 10000-11000 km
      QUO - no more than 350 m

      Operating temperature - from -40 to + 50 degrees C
      Start-up wind speed - up to 25 m / s

      Types of warheads: nuclear monoblock power 100-150 ct, possibly with a range of missile defense capabilities (PCB).

      Modifications:
      15Ж59 / RSS-40 "Courier" - the basic design of the rocket.

      "Start" / "Start-1" - a carrier rocket in the design of which elements of the "Courier" rocket are used, the control system uses developments in the "Courier" rocket control system.

      Status: USSR / Russia - throw tests of models, tests are not completed, development is stopped.
      1. -1
        12 February 2015 17: 00
        Quote: Rus2012
        Starting weight: - about 15000 kg (initial stage of the project) - about 17000 kg (final draft)Thrown weight - 500 kgRange - 10000-11000 kmQVO - no more than 350 m

        Fantastic absolutely wrong figures (it’s not clear on the basis of what veterans it was posted on http://militaryrussia.ru
        1. Parameters (weight) 15Ж59 worse than 15Ж48 (even Temp-2СМ2)

        2. Pioneers (SS-20), although with a larger mass of warheads, had a range of 4-5000km
        3. However, as well as TTX ICBM F-22
        4. The dwarf (with similar performance characteristics) could not issue the planned 6900. Mile (10-11000) km.
        BEST STARTING CONDITIONS: Norton Air Force Base in San Bernardino, California (latitude). And strictly west. pulled out 4000. mile.
        Given that the Americans have a better mix (Dwarf, this is the essence of the trimmed MX) and the shell mass is less.

        In fact, why they refused: to post only in the United States, and by whom to shoot with such a range?
        5. It is not reasonable to require parameters (in range) of a 17 000kg solid propellant rocket (in range) LIQUID (energy by 30% better) ICBM R-7 (launch weight under 300 000 kg), even if there is less (several times) thrown mass.

        The launch mass of this intercontinental missile (15Ж59) was only about 15 t –17t almost 20 times less than that of the first Russian R-7 ICBM
        6. ICBM "Thunder" - one-component(! only outboard fuel oxidizerUh) did not give such parameters
        1. 0
          6 December 2017 20: 53
          Quote: opus
          ICBM "Thunder" - a one-component (! Only fuel-oxidizer outboard air) did not give such parameters

          You didn’t mix anything up? The Thunder complex is a shipboard Meteorite 3M25 aka P-750, a strategic high-speed cruise missile, and its mass is three times lower, the start-up does not count, it accelerates to just 400 km / h. And for the most part, the BR does not fly in the atmosphere; it is thrashing by inertia in an airless one.
    4. +7
      12 February 2015 14: 30
      Quote: Free Wind
      It is a pity that they did not bring to mind. An interesting weapon would turn out.


      My father told me how they prepared TK for the 15Zh59 rocket, at the personal direction of Tolubko, who set the task to develop as soon as possible in response to Midzhitmen.
      Everything was done in a hurry along the entire chain and the rocket at first, as they say, did not go ... however, the developments of the SU and Spr for small-sized missiles subsequently formed the basis of the Topol-M and Bulava complexes. And RN Start flies today using the "Courier" TK control systems for which the father's department was just preparing.
      She allegedly did not get to flight tests for in 1991. Gorbachev personally closed this topic. By the way, the Americans and the midgetman did not succeed and quietly glued fins and did not return to similar projects.
  2. +3
    12 February 2015 08: 02
    More information on such little-known developments. Separate photo behind +
    1. The comment was deleted.
  3. +2
    12 February 2015 08: 02
    Excellent article !!! I have not heard anything about such developments with us before. I hope the reserve has been created and in the current conditions it can be used to develop new complexes.
    1. +1
      12 February 2015 12: 04
      Quote: Magic Archer
      I have not heard anything about such developments with us before.

      ... this topic was very carefully discussed by the developers and veterans of the Strategic Missile Forces on the Russian sites of Rusarmz (closed), detailed information is here - http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-442.html
      1. +4
        12 February 2015 14: 37
        Quote: Rus2012
        This topic was very carefully discussed by the developers and veterans of the Strategic Missile Forces on the Russian websites of Rusarmz (closed), details here


        By the way, all sources say that she didn’t get to the flight test ... in fact, this is not so ... There was the only launch that ended unsuccessfully, I had to activate the self-liquidation mode ...
        The only prototype was made ... Then many technological breakthrough solutions were used in the parallel project "Universal"
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          12 February 2015 17: 34
          Quote: Ascetic
          ... There was the only launch that ended unsuccessfully had to activate the self-liquidation mode ...

          at the end of 1990: real launch of a rocket with the development of the main pyrotechnic systems according to the simplified abnormal cyclogram during the flight of the first stage with a reduced charge of solid fuel.
          Startup completed successfully. Self-liquidator, maybe, it will not reach Kura, and it is unethical to flop in settlements
          It was at the PGRK "Speed" (15Zh66) that everything went wrong
          1. 0
            13 February 2015 09: 40
            Quote: opus
            It was at the PGRK "Speed" (15Zh66) that everything went wrong


            Yes you are right. According to the Courier, throw tests were conducted with the IRS program / test missile projectile / to test the control system. The program simulated a flight at an altitude of 2 km, which gave a complete picture of the operation of all missile systems.
    2. 0
      12 February 2015 16: 29
      Quote: Magic Archer
      I have not heard anything about such developments with us before.


      Decree of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Council of Ministers of the USSR of July 21 1983 No. 696-213
      Decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR No. 769-248 of 09.08.1983
  4. Aibolit
    +1
    12 February 2015 08: 02
    The country needs to continue developing mobile complexes. In connection with the deployment of a missile defense system in Europe and high-precision weapons, nuclear weapons which cannot be destroyed at a deployment point, is a big restraining argument.
  5. -24
    12 February 2015 08: 41
    They could not create a normal tomograph, and a rocket - so that "the whole world in dust", do not feed directly with bread.
    these missiles have already been stamped like dirt. Can we go to the moon or Mars?
  6. +8
    12 February 2015 09: 13
    Quote: Takashi
    They could not create a normal tomograph, and a rocket - so that "the whole world in dust", do not feed directly with bread.
    these missiles have already been stamped like dirt. Can we go to the moon or Mars?

    We are not such, such a life, there would be no these "unnecessary" missiles, our uncles have rolled us into dust a long time ago, there are a lot of examples of this.
  7. 0
    12 February 2015 10: 02
    There is great doubt about the possibility of carting ICBMs in the standard 40-foot. container ... The center of gravity will be very high and there is a chance of a coup (which truckers are not uncommon) in case of any accident, because you will have to travel on public roads. Yes, and the reliability of the photo on the topic "Courier", too. Start without jacks?
    1. +2
      12 February 2015 12: 15
      Quote: Nayhas
      And the reliability of the photo to the "Courier" theme too. Start without jacks?

      see above my comm.
      As a result, RK "Courier" came with a slightly different configuration.
      At the time of the development of the complex, there were acute problems in communications, security and defense (indeed, given the increasing intensity of transport and general cargo turnover, general roads could no longer satisfy them. Otherwise, they would have to be uncoupled).
      At present, the questions about the radio element base and communication have been removed. The problems of combat patrolling on public roads remain. Therefore - PGRK "Rubezh" - on lightly loaded roads and dirt.
      1. +7
        12 February 2015 14: 53
        Quote: Rus2012
        The problems of combat patrolling on public roads remain.


        Yes, there were no problems in general; they quietly organized a march along federal highways at night without any problems at all. in the daytime, they rarely walked in the windows between the Lacrosses and Kihouls ... there was a certain burden on the commandant service of intelligence and interaction with the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the latter was an insurmountable obstacle, and subsequently they refused to use their services and
        FPS travel mode for vehicles. The incidents were minor, only the poplars of the first series were not run-in yet, the operating experience was small, they often traveled a lot and there were occasional problems with automatic control systems, I had to get up and drive the modes. Naturally accumulated transport and discontent of the population ...
        and the incidents ... once the dare was de-energized by tearing down the sagging wires with the R-173 antenna, they stopped the drunk tractor drivers a couple of times with the help of an armored personnel carrier, the villager was demolished during the turn at night, and they had to be restored with the soldiers ... I asked how you didn’t notice the eparch? The one I thought hit a bump laughing
        Here are some of the incidents on the march, not counting the naturally introductory training, such as mining, chemical missile defense, DRG attacks and other joys ...
  8. -1
    12 February 2015 10: 10
    And how much protection is needed, on how many vehicles?
    1. +3
      12 February 2015 15: 52
      Quote: saag
      And how much protection is needed, on how many vehicles?


      Well, you ask questions. Which is better not to ask ... How much security is required is set out in the combat documents on the organization of the march and the Instructions for carrying the database for the regiments of the PGRK, which are usually labeled "sov.secretno" And the information on the Courier is still classified.
  9. +2
    12 February 2015 10: 15
    Good article. The main one of the few today is not about politics, but military equipment. 17tn for the intercontinental is a masterpiece. Although, apparently, the complex should be placed on at least two cars. But this is not bad either.
    As for the jacks. It is possible that the car was fixed by folding sides, or by units located on the back of the sides
  10. +1
    12 February 2015 13: 15
    If, as the author writes, the developments on the project have not disappeared, then perhaps they are being used in the development of the new Barguzin BZHRK. If they managed to put the rocket on the tractor, then God himself ordered it on the railway platform, taking into account new technologies, materials, element base, positioning system.
    1. +1
      12 February 2015 13: 58
      Quote: Captain45
      Project achievements did not disappear

      ... they went to the creation of the PGRK "Rubezh" RS-26
      Range:
      - minimal - 1000 km (estimate)
      - maximum - not less than 7000 km (estimate)

      At the bottom of the photo -
      MZKT-79291 chassis allegedly under the RS-26 at the parade in Minsk, July 3 2013
  11. 0
    12 February 2015 13: 29
    It is interesting how these complexes can be operated now. This is probably a few small, not suspicious and unnecessary questions bases. Of which, at the hour of truth, missile-carrying cars come out with guards. The guard should not cause suspicion. And to find a small lane, to start. No special problems. Constantly travel along the roads of the country. I personally would not risk sending on duty too many surprises on the roads.
    1. 0
      12 February 2015 15: 40
      Quote: Free Wind
      with protection. protection should not cause suspicion.

      What is it like? All long-range fighters are not guarded, and then be amazed - with guards, at hour "x" saboteur (s), if they will destroy any Kamaz with a similar container
      1. 0
        12 February 2015 17: 00
        security with long-distance travels. did not know? Valuable goods are accompanied. There is one car right next to the truck. another without drawing attention a little behind. Car transporters are protected, with very expensive cars. Cars carrying explosives are also guarded. Used to be trucks with cigarettes, one of the most expensive cargoes. a freight costs tens of millions of rubles, I don’t know now.
    2. +2
      12 February 2015 15: 56
      Quote: Free Wind
      This is probably a few small, not suspicious and unnecessary questions bases.


      all bases and their coordinates should be taken into account in accordance with START_3, and deployed ICBMs are marked with American POPs / their own identification marks / Plus, displays and the presence of members of the bilateral commission and working groups during flight tests are practiced.
  12. +1
    12 February 2015 14: 35
    Now, from the Volgograd "Barricades" there are horns and legs. Glory to the effective grabber.
  13. 0
    12 February 2015 16: 29
    For the Courier, a special MAZ 2000 chassis was developed in Minsk, it was also called "Perestroika", a very successful car, and it was possible to bring another axle with a motor to it under the truck if there was not enough traction. The complex was brought to mind, we had to go to it on release, but the marked Misha signed the contract on time and he was hacked to death, I mean OSV - 2
  14. 0
    12 February 2015 16: 58
    Container placement of compact ICBMs is good in itself, but "halfway" without proper legend of their movement. One of the best options is the use of "public-private" logistics companies operating on both domestic and intercontinental routes.
  15. +2
    12 February 2015 17: 20
    Quote: Author
    The MAZ-6422 tractor unit and the MAZ-9389 semi-trailer ..... were chosen as the base for the disguised modification of the complex ..... Such a self-propelled launcher could, without attracting attention, move around the country and, in case of receiving an order, launch.

    Touched
    1.Gross weight: road trains - 42100 kg, towed semi-trailer - 32850 kg. Permissible load on saddle device - 14700 kg. Payload - 26000 kg.


    Comparable to the Courier, the Midget had




    with standard data for Western Europe and the USA: 12t axle load (all Liebherr, Grove, Demag cranes and other special)
    2. With its own mass of ICBMs in 15-17 tons, its mass with TPK and hydraulics will be under 40-50 tons
    When trying to raise the ICBM to the starting position:
    -the pin will be pulled out of the SCS
    -if not pulled out, twist the frame in a knot.
    3. Without jacks, it is not possible to set an ICBM before launch
    4. Without a reliable and small-sized communication system (combat control)?
    5. Without a weather station, topographic location, without a combat crew work area?
    6. Without hydropneumatic suspension, as on the MAZ79-29?

    7. Even to the Verenitsa complex, the F-22 rocket (project), with a mass of 13500kg
    The container was "not quite regular"



    -yes and failed to implement it
    ---------------------------------
    For covert transportation to TPK for additional and only !!!
    No "launches" if necessary, fantasies are groundless
  16. 0
    14 February 2015 10: 40
    A month ago, in Ukraine, the news was thrown into the media that the Yuzhmash Design Bureau allegedly sold documentation for the Kurier missile over the hill ... If this is a Moscow development, then the news is fake. Or - rockets of the same name feel
  17. +1
    11 June 2015 15: 02
    Quote: Yurich
    The complex was brought to mind, we had to go to the issue for it, but the labeled Misha signed the contract on time and it was hacked, I mean OSV - 2

    Sorry, comrade, but there was only one launch, and in a non-standard configuration, how can you say after that that "it was delivered"? Misha Labeled, of course, is still that bastard, as a result of the signing of the contract, the work on the "Courier" was stopped. But you were wrong with the name of the contract. He signed the START I Treaty. The SALT-1 treaty was signed by Brezhnev in 2.
  18. 0
    12 November 2017 16: 41
    Quote: Nayhas
    There is great doubt about the possibility of carting ICBMs in the standard 40-foot. container ... The center of gravity will be very high and there is a chance of a coup (which truckers are not uncommon) in case of any accident, because you will have to travel on public roads. Yes, and the reliability of the photo on the topic "Courier", too. Start without jacks?

    In the TPK container, in it is a rocket. MIT standard solution. At the start: stop, the tractor leaves, the container opens, jacks, lifting the TPK and starting like Poplar-Yars .. drinks
  19. 0
    12 November 2017 16: 56
    Here are the pictures

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"