All sitting? ..

17 001 16
From the Charter (just like that - the organization itself always and everywhere represents this document with a capital letter) UN:

1. Maintain international peace and security and, to this end, take effective collective measures to prevent and eliminate threats to peace and suppress acts of aggression or other breaches of peace and carry out by peaceful means, in accordance with the principles of justice and international law, settle or settle international disputes or situations that may violate the peace.
2. Develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, as well as take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace.
3. To carry out international cooperation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural and humanitarian character and in promoting and developing respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction of race, sex, language or religion.
4. To be a center for coordinating the actions of nations in achieving these common goals.


From the document on the main goals and objectives OSCE - Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe:

diplomatic efforts to prevent conflict;
taking steps to build trust and security;
protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief
protection of equality and the rights of peoples to dispose of their fate;
non-use of force or threat of force.


From the Statute of the Council of Europe (in part Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe):
Achieving greater unity for the sake of security, realizing the ideals and principles that are our common heritage and promoting economic and social progress through equal dialogue.

From the main position WTO (World Trade Organization) - Marrakesh Agreement:
relations in the field of trade and economic policy should be implemented with the aim of raising living standards, ensuring full employment and significant and continuous growth in real incomes and effective demand, as well as expanding production and trade in goods and services with optimal use of world resources in accordance with sustainable development goals , striving for the protection and preservation of the environment and for the expansion of opportunities for this in ways that are compatible with their respective needs and interest mi at various levels of economic development;
the need for positive efforts aimed at providing developing countries, and especially the least developed of them, with a guaranteed share in the growth of international trade, commensurate with the needs of their economic development;
the desire to contribute to the implementation of these goals by reaching mutual and mutually beneficial agreements aimed at significantly reducing tariffs and other barriers to trade and eliminating discriminatory treatment in international trade relations.
It was decided to create an integrated, more viable and sustainable multilateral trading system based on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, previous achievements in trade liberalization and all the results of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations,
Determined to preserve the basic principles and to support the goals embodied in this multilateral trading system.


All sitting? ..


The material presents the statutes and the main provisions of such international political and economic organizations as the UN, OSCE, PACE and WTO. And there is still a whole lot of alliances, associations, associations, intergovernmental commissions and other structures, which in the light of all the latest events can be called non-performing. There is no doubt that they annually master (devour) billions of dollars. Even as mastered! Russia alone in all of these structures annually pays out about a quarter of a billion dollars, of which almost a third (about 70 million) goes to the UN budget. But at least one of the organizations listed above fulfills its obligations, which it also spelled out in the charters?

If the leadership of the UN - an organization that has grown to gigantic proportions and finally lost the coast, sat on the reefs of serving the interests of the only “exceptional” state, fulfilled at least 10 percent of its duties, then when reading phrases from the UN Charter about “supporting international peace” "And" settling international disputes "there would be no desire to raise eyebrows in surprise. This is what, sorry, the case of the United Nations recently settled mentioned international disputes? This is the case when the leadership of megacouters with megabytes did not withdraw from participation in a multilateral discussion in order to find a compromise solution? Here to meet the bearded Conchita - yes! - A strong decision, an important one ... And the fact that at this time in the Donbass “Gradov” is pouring residential quarters, the fact that Syria, Iraq, Libya is in ruins is on the side. If so, then with the similar “success” as UN Secretary-General, instead of Ban Ki-moon, you could elect any person from the street - dress up in a suit, tie a tie and explain that your job is not to do anything that is written in the charter. . Everything else is for God's sake ... And it is better to start fish instead of the general secretary - and that is more pacification than from Pan ... Fish will be much cheaper ...

The OSCE mission has been “monitoring” something in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions for more than six months. People with an important view, in white shirts, on expensive cars, with expensive equipment, do some work that is not visible to anyone in the end. Machines with the OSCE logo are visible, white collars too - but the work, even if you burst, is not visible ... The OSCE representatives themselves come under fire, but this does not lead to any adequate response from "progressive humanity". Further words about the "need to cease fire," it does not go. The question is: why the hell is this organization?
Mosque spawn Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, whose representatives, apparently, the organization's charter has not seen. If they have, then where is the “equal dialogue” mentioned in the statute, where is “greater unity for the sake of security”? Or is the goal - to receive contributions, to get rid of these contributions, while still not allowing to the dialogue those who pay for membership in PACE?

The World Trade Organization clearly needs to revise either its charter or its name. If not only in the actions, but also in the name, the term “Organization promoting US trade interests” appeared, then everything would definitely converge. Otherwise, how can we explain the fact that in violation of all conceivable principles of the WTO, Washington not only imposes illegal economic sanctions, but also stifles others with the goal that they (at a loss) support measures of trade obscurantism.

Organizations have proliferated so much that it is simply indecent. Not a planet, but a forest glade, in which the toadstool becomes more and more. Around the forest is burning, and they absorb acrid smoke and grow in size. And some people still try to brew a potion from these toadstools and solder everyone around. That's just the potion is not all ready to slurp circles, more caring about how to save the habitat and not get the same charred charcoal bones instead of a living and diverse world.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    4 February 2015 07: 19
    To develop friendly relations between nations on the basis of respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, as well as take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace.

    Read and do the opposite - the modern methods of the United States, - the country - the UN parking lot!
    1. +3
      4 February 2015 11: 29
      The UN generally needs to be abolished due to the loss of its core functions (the United States openly puts it on the UN with the device when it is beneficial for them), now the UN is engaged in idle chatter.
    2. sdg32dg
      -1
      5 February 2015 07: 04
      I want to give one piece of advice! I quit smoking 100 times, probably to no avail, until I read about this method, after a week I already forgot what a cigarette is, everything is correctly painted here http://dimasmok.blogspot.com
  2. +8
    4 February 2015 07: 20
    strange thing, however ....
    So many institutions and everyone like Ban Ki-moon are working for Washington!
    Isn't it time to create your own, where every voice can be heard ???
    1. +7
      4 February 2015 09: 28
      there are organizations of the SCO, BRICS, etc. - only their weight is not the same (although according to the BRICS one can argue). We need to achieve such successes in the economy, the state of the armed forces, etc., so that they would bow to us with petition ... and what would Abamka be on our premises ...
    2. +1
      4 February 2015 17: 26
      Quote: slizhov
      strange thing, however ....
      So many institutions and everyone like Ban Ki-moon are working for Washington!
      Isn't it time to create your own, where every voice can be heard ???

      Disperse to hell and create new institutions of equality of countries, not the lackey of one rotten one!
  3. +4
    4 February 2015 07: 22
    Yes, you’ll create it here ... No matter what Russia proposes to do, they will immediately ban it and call it the number one threat to the world order.
  4. +6
    4 February 2015 07: 25
    It has long been said that all these organizations have outlived themselves. While sanctions are being applied against us, it is best to suspend our membership in them, or even to quit, because everyone has long spit on our opinion.
    On equal terms they talk with the strong.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +6
      4 February 2015 07: 45
      Quote: PSih2097
      While sanctions are being applied against us, it is best to suspend our membership in them, or else to quit, because everyone doesn’t give a damn about our opinion there.

      That's just from the UN is not necessary, all the same, Russia in the Security Council of that office. hi
  5. +5
    4 February 2015 07: 34
    It seems that the UN has generally turned into a kind of sinecure.
    Churkin is saying something, arguing, but the meeting is rolling its course in no reaction.
    Come to serve the room.
    A word to that, a word to this, I put the resolution to the vote, the meeting is over.
    The cycle of meaninglessness.
    And what we say is that this is a platform for expressing our position, and who is listening to this expression?
    Country Representatives? So everything is brought to their countries through other channels.
    The media will show the speeches of everyone who is against us, but will not show Churkin, or replace his words.
    In my opinion, there is more harm from the UN than good.
    1. 0
      4 February 2015 15: 23
      We noticed that often a chin sits behind Churkin with a stub and looks at him with a blank face
  6. +5
    4 February 2015 07: 55
    3/4 of the money the UN receives from the United States and "European allies", so the UN is their "pocket" organization like Moody's or Poor ... we would have been "expelled" from there long ago if it were not for the veto and our nuclear arsenal
  7. +5
    4 February 2015 07: 58
    So many organizations have bred that it’s simply indecent.

    Even indecent is the fact that there is only one control center for these organizations - the United States.
  8. +7
    4 February 2015 08: 04
    At present, only one unfortunate fact has to be stated - all currently existing international organizations of the UN, OSCE, WTO, PACE, etc. completely lost their originally declared functions and turned into a "mouthpiece" for US policy. The Russian leadership should think carefully about the advisability of finding Russia in such structures as the PACE and the OSCE, because relations with Europe have simply been spoiled, and it is simply absurd to talk about their restoration in their former form .... Russia should now focus on developing relations in within the SCO, BRICS and EURASEC, and to understand the need for this, it is enough just to look at the geographical map of the world ...
  9. +3
    4 February 2015 08: 05
    The world bureaucracy has an unpleasant property - it is growing. They will also create a couple of "authoritative" organizations, and they will go to meetings with a clever look. And we will pay. Ours, too, "bought", we need to participate! , someone made a career - we have miners for 18 years of "slaughter" - maybe retire. hi
  10. +3
    4 February 2015 08: 06
    The very idea and goal of creating the UN was good, but what do we see now? A platform for lobbying their own selfish goals of a handful of "exceptional" ...
  11. +2
    4 February 2015 08: 19
    Conflicts in the World are beneficial for the UN. This office feeds on blood. Now there are rumors that Merkel should be put at the helm if he flies in the elections. This clearly demonstrates who owns this shop along with all the giblets.
  12. +5
    4 February 2015 08: 25
    Quote: PSih2097
    It has long been said that all these organizations have outlived themselves. While sanctions are being applied against us, it is best to suspend our membership in them, or even to quit, because everyone has long spit on our opinion.
    On equal terms they talk with the strong.


    A strong one is considered to be the one who responds to any action with equivalent resistance.
    Well, we have a joke:
    - I deceived a taxi driver.
    -?
    - He gave money and did not go ...
  13. +1
    4 February 2015 09: 03
    Of course, an audit in these offices is simply necessary. But the mericatos, under whose cap all these sharagi, will not give and do not dream. Only to root out everything that has settled there and to review our positions in these stalls.
  14. zol1
    +3
    4 February 2015 09: 19
    Russia alone pays about a quarter of a billion dollars annually to all these structures, of which almost a third (about 70 million dollars) goes to the UN budget. But at least one of the organizations listed above fulfills its obligations, which it spelled out in the charters?


    Based on the above, the question arises: - Why the hell, Russia, especially after all these demarches by the West, why the hell are we throwing away huge amounts of money on contributions to these fraudulent, overfed organizations?!!! And this at a time when we are being pressured in all directions on the economic front (for now on the economic front), it is all the more clear that the previous "friendly" relations will not exist. So for how long?
  15. +3
    4 February 2015 09: 43
    It's just that the Kremlin’s assessors need to understand that life is changing, the above organizations are changing. And that means that Russia needs to change its attitude towards these organizations.
  16. calocha
    0
    4 February 2015 10: 08
    IMF, WTO, WB instruments of influence of the USA! In contrast to the existing ones, you need to create NEW within the BRICS framework and when creating the whole world, indicate the shortcomings of outdated institutions by pulling the electorate to the newly created ones !!! GOD IN TRUTH! Socialism will triumph!
  17. 0
    4 February 2015 10: 19
    Quote: Gardamir
    It's just that the Kremlin’s assessors need to understand that life is changing, the above organizations are changing. And that means that Russia needs to change its attitude towards these organizations.

    Not only to change, A JUST RETURN THE BACK TO THEM AND DO IT ... NO THEM - THEY HAVE A LONG TIME
  18. 0
    4 February 2015 10: 24
    Stop throwing money to feed those who shit us. Is it time to officially withdraw from the shareholders of this feeder for loafers? Since these offices work for Fashington, let him keep them. We’ll manage somehow without monitoring, will they do without us?
  19. 0
    4 February 2015 10: 37
    It's time to stop making contributions to these offices. How are you doing. Officially do not go out (except for the WTO), and do not pay money. And nehai slander ...
  20. 0
    4 February 2015 10: 43
    The Russian leadership should think carefully about the advisability of finding Russia in such structures as PACE and the OSCE, because relations with Europe are spoiled simply nowhere else and it is simply absurd to talk about restoring them in their previous form

    I completely agree. As for the UN, the USSR was one of the founders of this organization, along with the United States and Britain. Therefore, we cannot leave there in any way, even though the "partners" have already visibly become "potential adversaries" again. Unfortunately, history repeats itself.
  21. +1
    4 February 2015 11: 00
    It is possible to leave all international institutions, calling them "non-working", but is there any benefit to us?
    If we are talking about the International Trade Organization, then the lack of world-famous goods today does not mean that they will not appear in our country tomorrow. You just have to strive for this, and not focus on selling wood, hemp and tar .... Use all the platforms to promote your goods, achievements, ideas .... AND WILL BE HAPPINESS FOR US.
  22. Komron
    0
    4 February 2015 11: 00
    It is time to disband all these organizations. One way or another, they are all the means of the United States, with the help of which it wants to establish its power throughout the world.
  23. 0
    4 February 2015 17: 44
    Not a planet, but a forest glade, on which there are more and more mushroom toadstools. Around the forest burns, and they absorb caustic smoke and grow in size.
    That's how it is now. It's a shame, a bummer, but something needs to be done. And to do something very simple, your I, in the current circumstances, needs to be put higher than THEY. To live with wolves, howl like a wolf. Don't let yourself be bitten. As the classic said, delay is like death.
  24. VSC
    0
    4 February 2015 18: 31
    Leave these structures? What do you mean, you climbed there, you can say without soap, and the "civilized world" will not understand, and God forbid the international rating will decrease (there is no internal one), who will it break out in front of?
  25. mihasik
    0
    5 February 2015 02: 11
    The dissolution of the UN, even in the form it is now, will hit hard on the influence of Russia with the right to "veto" the expansion of the West. Good or bad, aggression according to the UN decision is legal, and without the UN decision it is not legal, which gives Russia a reason to put pressure on "partners" from international norms and rules. In the absence of such pressure, complete chaos and regional wars will begin in the world. Ukraine and Syria with Iraq will seem like flowers. By the way, the West has already tried to push into the UN Charter an amendment to the law abolishing the "veto" right.