Russia will use its main weapon against the eternal enemy
In the Moscow region, the workshop continues with the participation of regional leaders. One of the resonances was a lecture in which the clandestine operations of London against Russia were mentioned. Judging by the puzzled reaction of some participants, many find it difficult to part with the cozy picture of the Russian storiesin which the Russians themselves are to blame.At a seminar in Anosino on Thursday, President Putin spoke, and even before him, the head of the Kremlin administration spoke and answered questions. After Sergei Ivanov, the historian Alexander Myasnikov, one of the authors of the exhibition “The Romanovs. My history". The text of the speech by Myasnikov is not publicly available, but here’s how RBC sets it out:
“His lecture fully fit into the“ conservative ”trend: many successful Russian tsars died under mysterious circumstances due to the fact that Western countries were not satisfied, opposition members were financed from abroad, and it was not Ukrainians who formed the New Russia. Boris Godunov was the first elected king and ingenious manager, noted Myasnikov. But famine and “external opposition” began. As a result, Godunov unexpectedly died, and from his symptoms it clearly follows that "a man with a fluff is smashed in the back of the head." Nicholas I allegedly did not survive the suffering because of the defeat in the Crimean campaign. “But we didn’t lose a single meter as a result of the Crimean War,” said Myasnikov, and suggested that the heavy consequences of the campaign were spoken “by the West.” Myasnikov did not fail to add that Herzen's Bell, in which Russia was criticized, was financed by Rothschild. “This is the first WikiLeaks,” he said, and said that the newspaper published reports on closed State Council meetings.
According to RBC, the speeches of the historian angered the Kirov governor Nikita Belykh, who even asked Sergei Ivanov: “Do we understand correctly that this speech should be considered an official history? For the most part, the performance consisted of historical tales and anecdotes. ” Belykh was particularly indignant at the statements about the Crimean War, in which Russia lost 150 thousands of dead, as well as Herzen. “I liked the presentation,” answered Ivanov, who noted that the historian’s story was interesting, and it would be boring to listen to the facts from the textbook. “As for Herzen. Our eternal adversary is England, which has always shattered us and will continue to do so, ”added the head of the presidential administration.
Everything is noteworthy in this story — Ivanov’s reaction to Belykh’s question, and how the mockingly liberal press sets out Myasnikov’s speech, and, of course, the governor’s indignation with “bikes and anecdotes”.
Ivanov's words are extremely important because a person who has spent many years in London on the line of foreign intelligence and is the closest associate of the president, without any reservations, says something that absolutely does not fit into the heads of our Westerners - the truth.
Russia has a historical geopolitical adversary who for many centuries has viewed our country as a threat to its plans for global domination and is doing everything to harm us. And it will do this further, because this is the Anglo-Saxon style of dealing with opponents, this is the very essence of the Anglo-Saxon attitude towards Russia, a force that interfered with plans for world domination of London two centuries ago and interferes with the global project of Washington and London today. This is not surprising, such is the nature of the confrontation of two multidirectional (both spiritually and geopolitically) civilizations - it is surprising that this simple truth stubbornly does not want to recognize a significant part of our post-Soviet "elite". Maybe that's why they are increasingly called the "fifth column"?
No, of course, most of those who categorically reject the assertion that the Anglo-Saxons are a historical geopolitical opponent of Russia, are not at all national traitors - they sincerely believe that Russia has no eternal enemies, and indeed all our troubles from our negligence , from the fact that we have a little Europe. They were so taught.
And even when they recognize that Russia has enemies, as now, when they simply have nowhere to go, they explain this fact with the fact that we are guilty, overdone in defending national interests (this phrase had to be learned) agree with everyone amicably. But Russian history is good, including the fact that it gives us numerous examples of any forms and methods, from secret to obvious, with which the Anglo-Saxons pursued a policy of containing Russia.
From direct pressure to covert manipulations, from assassinations of top officials to propaganda and ideological work, from economic wars to direct military invasion - everything is your heart’s content. The problem is that too many in our “elite” never knew Russian history or consciously turned a blind eye to uncomfortable facts. Because otherwise it would simply have been impossible to pursue the policy that they pursued in the 90s, when, under the pretext of the disappearance of communism and the elimination of ideological confrontation, it was actually officially proclaimed that we have no contradictions with the West, moreover, we are part, ready for almost everything for the sake of integration. The fact that communism was only a pretext for the crusade of the West against us, that geopolitical interests and contradictions are not canceled by the change of ideology and even the social order in one of the countries, was rejected as nonsense and trash.
After coming to power, Putin put national interests at the forefront, but for a long time he preferred not to demonstrate to the outside world that we know how the Anglo-Saxons really treat us. The desire not to say out loud what you know how your adversary treats you, the persistent use of the term “partners” was a manifestation of not only goodwill (Russia really did not intend to conflict with anyone), but also the desire to get time for gathering strength defense and economic power of the country.
Now, when, faced with an attempt to cut Ukraine off from Russia, we were in a state of geopolitical war, we can no longer pretend that we believe in a good attitude towards us. Calling a spade a spade, which makes Vladimir Putin speaking about the policy of containment, which has been carried out for centuries, and Sergey Ivanov, speaking about the eternal adversary. This is important not only to clarify relations with the West, but also for the domestic political situation. Not to, as our cosmopolitans like to repeat, to create an image of the enemy and lower the iron curtain, but to advance the process of reformatting the “elite” towards the formation of a truly nationally thinking leadership layer.
Because only people who firmly stand on national ground, and therefore loving and knowing the history of the country, can lead the country through testing, because only this makes it possible to formulate goals and make real plans for the future, soberly assess threats and problems, both internal and external. and external.
Therefore, those who laugh at the famous “Englishwoman shits,” calling it conspiracy or empty tales, become simply dangerous for their own people. To ignore Russia's historical experience, including the history of our relations with England, means, willingly or unwittingly, to prepare the ground for the repetition of the same tragedies that were already in our history. It is ridiculous to think that the enemy acts against us only on the external geopolitical front (in regions that have already considered their prey after 1991 of the year, or in any other part of the world) or on the economic and ideological field. In the same way, he is trying to use our internal contradictions and subtle places to weaken Russia, to create problems and difficulties for it, to change power and course.
That is, it acts in the same way as it has acted all the last centuries, when it had no opportunity to hold back Russia with direct military force, as it was in 1853. Support for anti-government emigrants or massive campaigns to demonize our rulers and the country as a whole in the eyes of the Western public, subversive work in hot regions like the Caucasus or the use of cosmopolitan forces within the Russian elite — all this has been repeated more than once in the long history of the Anglo-Saxons against Russia. But there were much more large-scale actions.
The murder of Paul I in 1801 year (the plot was made with the active participation of the British) prevented the alliance of St. Petersburg and Paris, which threatened the British Empire, the murder of Grigory Rasputin (in which the British intelligence officer participated) was the final chord before the February 1917 coup of the year, prepared with the direct participation of the Anglophile party and the British Embassy. Even the two wars of Germany and Russia in the last century were to a large extent provoked by the London game of pushing Berlin to the war in the east (in 1914, the Kaiser was neatly convinced that England would not enter the war, and the attack of Hess on the USSR was preceded by the flight of Hess to the island , after which the second front did not open until 1944 year).
Churchill's plans to strike at the USSR using Wehrmacht forces in May 1945, and his proposal to the Americans to launch a nuclear attack on Russia a year later is no longer secret. So Cameron’s current proposals to cut off Russia from the international payment system are just childish jokes compared to what the Anglo-Saxons are ready to do to us at a convenient opportunity.
And the fact that now they do not have such an opportunity militarily means only one thing: their efforts in all other areas to destabilize Russia will only increase. This is not a reason for alarm, because forewarned is forearmed. We are warned not by intelligence, not by Putin’s experience, but by our own history. Her knowledge is our main weapon, because all our main troubles began when we forgot her lessons. Now, thank God, it definitely does not threaten us.
Information