Controlled chaos

7 240 15
Controlled chaosNATO expansion to the east as a cause of problems in modern Europe and the Ukrainian crisis

The world is on the verge of a drastic change - a new industrial revolution, a change in the technological structure. Global changes are accompanied by all sorts of wars - hybrid, traditional and cyber war.

The desire of a part of supranational structures, the United States to preserve world domination, based on a losing US dollar, like EMC, leads to the creation of large-scale "controlled chaos". Today, the United States is unleashing a war against Europe, with whose hands the United States wants to weaken both the Russian Federation and Europe. The war of trade and economic sanctions, unleashed by the US, leads to an aggravation of relations and a significant weakening of Europe and Russia.

The change of the global technological order creates the fundamental prerequisites for a new world war or a new mixed type war, the growth of cyberwar. Artificially created by the United States, the global players in Ukraine, the conflict and the crisis is designed to postpone the existence of a “financial bubble”, which is ten times larger than the global economy.

The world today is on the verge of a new arms race, where hybrid and traditional wars that are currently underway will continue to play a major role. weapons.

The detriment of the weakening of the Eurozone and Russia due to the situation in Ukraine and the economic war unleashed by the US and the satellites is to a certain extent reflected in the letter “Not on our behalf”, published in December 2014 of the year. The authors of the text rightly write about the need for detente of the West in relations with Russia, that the US is destabilizing the world order. More than 60 people - politicians, economists, journalists and representatives of culture - signed a letter in which they opposed the war with Russia and for the new policy of detente in Europe.

The ex-adviser to Chancellor Horst Telchik, former Secretary of State for Security Walter Stützle and former Vice-Chairman of the Bundestag Antje Vollmer initiated the letters from Germany. In addition to a number of famous figures and famous economists, the text of the document was signed by veterans of the political elite from various parties, among them former federal president Roman Herzog, Klaus von Donanie (SPD), Eberhard Diepgen (CDU), Manfred Stolpe (SPD), Burkhard Hirsch (SVPG), Otto Schily (Greens, later SPD) and former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder.

This position was supported by Helmut Schmidt, as well as Helmut Kohl and Hans-Dietrich Genscher. In the United States, this opinion is generally shared by Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski.

Criticizing the annexation of the Crimea to the Russian Federation, the signatories to the document, much like Kissinger, believe that the West has made a serious mistake by developing "a threat to the East that the West has extended to the East without simultaneous deepening of cooperation with Moscow."

The signatories to the document rightly point out that in violation of international and bilateral agreements, NATO systematically moves to the East, including Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova in all the main programs of the Alliance, which have received special preferences from the US and NATO since December 2014.

The choice of pro-European or pro-Russian development imposed on Ukraine by the West, including a significant number of security provisions in the association agreement with the EU, and the program decisions of the NATO summit in Wales confirmed Moscow’s assumptions about bringing Kiev closer to the EU as a hidden NATO expansion.

60 signatories offer to "stop spinning the spiral of threats." The authors of the document emphasize that the annexation of the Crimea is no longer reversed. And they ask a rhetorical question, is it necessary because of this to cut off all ties with Moscow?

In today's turbulent world, it is proposed to discuss together with the Russian Federation many aspects - Iran’s nuclear file, Syrian and Iraqi conflicts, ensuring the withdrawal of peacekeeping forces from Afghanistan, limiting the arms race, North Korea’s nuclear arsenal, cooperation in space.

A possible way out is to offer constitutional status acceptable to Kiev and Moscow, guaranteeing the integrity of Ukraine and at the same time granting the eastern regions autonomy, which would exclude their separation.

It is also proposed to return to negotiations on constructive relations between the EU and the Eurasian Union, a return to the idea of ​​creating a common European security structure, in which the issue of Ukraine’s membership in NATO is losing its importance, focusing on creating a single space from Vancouver to Vladivostok (for more information).

Defrosting, at the initiative of the West, smoldering and the creation of new conflicts in the Balkan-Black Sea-Caucasus region, intensified the struggle between Russia and the West for domination in the post-Soviet space. A month after the signing of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union by the Russian Federation, Belarus and Belarus, Brussels associates Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova, expanding the free trade zone with them. At the same time, steps to draw Moldavia and Georgia into the zone of European political and economic control are accompanied by their rapprochement with NATO.

As I wrote in 2011, the US national security strategy, presented by US President George W. Bush in 2002, considers the Black Sea and Caspian regions as an important strategic source of oil, as well as a springboard for subsequent US access to promising markets in China, India, Pakistan and the South -Eastern Asia. The importance of the Black Sea region and the attention to it naturally increases its military significance, the danger of military conflicts, which makes experts talk about the importance of building a regional security system.

Earlier, the United States officially declared the Black Sea-Caspian region a zone of its special energy interests, as an alternative source of oil and gas products to the Persian Gulf region. As part of the National Security Council under the President of the United States, a special department was created, the position of special adviser to the president and secretary of state for the Black Sea-Caspian region was introduced, and a special operational unit was established within the CIA to monitor political processes in the Black Sea and Caspian countries. In turn, the European countries of NATO pay considerable attention to the region also on the basis of energy security considerations, and in view of the limited military capabilities of the EU, at this stage they rely on their military presence in the region through the Alliance’s military initiatives.

In accordance with the strategic plans, the United States intends to develop the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TTP), turning it into a military-political alliance. The United States seeks to maintain control, replacing weakening economic positions with military force.
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    2 February 2015 05: 25
    60 people who signed the letter propose "to stop unwinding the spiral of threats"

    For the umpteenth time I am asking myself a question. Why do Western politicians, only after resigning, begin to express sound judgments about relations with Russia and about world politics in general? Or what if they had said the same things initially, the Washington Regional Committee would not have approved them for their positions? The position was binding. And now there is nothing to lose - you can tell the truth.
    1. +1
      2 February 2015 05: 37
      Yes, because they are all like prostitutes. Who pays them and has them. And old prostitutes are no longer suitable, they don’t pay money, and here comes the epiphany of democratic cynicism. Yes, I know that I was lying, but the owner “asked”! But I Neee understood that it was bad, but now !!!!
    2. 0
      2 February 2015 06: 31
      In fact, even in the "positions", many of the signatories - Schmidt, Kohl, Genscher, and even Schroeder and Herzog adhered to a balanced pragmatic policy, defending the interests of their country, and not following Washington's lead on every occasion. True, there were figures in Washington who deserve more respect - Reagan, Bush Jr., Clinton. Politicians in Europe and Washington have been shredded, they have been shredded ...
    3. 0
      2 February 2015 06: 38
      Indeed, there is no wonder. I think even Brzezinski, when he finally retired, will behave in the same way.
  2. +3
    2 February 2015 05: 28
    The USA needs a world war to overcome the crisis.
    Our task is to prevent the fulfillment of US goals.
    1. 0
      2 February 2015 05: 47
      The USA needs a world war to overcome the crisis.
      Our task is to prevent the fulfillment of US goals.


      No world war will help with SUCH debts. But the debts are not even the main thing. After all, printing papers or defaulting on obligations are not the first. What is worse is what led to such debts. Americans stupidly consume more than they produce. And this problem cannot be solved by any economic, military or any other methods. The problem has only TWO solutions. The first is genocide of part of the population (blacks, Chinese, Latinos). The second is transferring part of the population to the level of "third class" with a sharp reduction in consumption. Here, not only those listed will get it, but also most white Americans. I think that the real leaders of the Western world are considering both of these options. And both options have their supporters. The Anglo-Saxon wing is inclined to the first option, which at the same time wants to achieve moral and material superiority over the USA. Due to the fact that such a large-scale genocide can only be carried out within the framework of a war on the territory of the USA, which, of course, will bury both the economy and the remains of industry of this country. The "patriots" of the USA are inclined to the second option. Who want to preserve the world leadership of the USA, and their own, of course. So far they cannot decide which option to choose. And, most likely, they will never reach a consensus and will use the option that is more advantageous at the specific moment of the collapse of the global financial system. If it is a "soft landing" after the destruction of the BRICS countries, then they will use the second option. If a "hot war" breaks out against China (a hot war against Russia is impossible due to nuclear deterrence), then under the noise or a couple of nuclear warheads they will let through and start cutting up the Chinese, for whom blacks and Latinos will stand up, or they will even simply start an operation to intern the Chinese, like with ethnic Japanese in the USA during WWII. Considering the number of Chinese in the USA, this will not be resolved peacefully, so welcome to "Civil War in the USA 2.0".
  3. +3
    2 February 2015 05: 29
    Thank you.
    It is surprising that a country as strong as the United States cannot find more worthy action to overcome the crisis. Those who rule in America hope that they can always manage to hide their aggression.
    However, in our time of rapid information, such interference in the politics of other countries can destroy the great power of the United States. Why sow evil when there are always humane ideas. It's time to change old habits, it's time to change the cave ideology))
  4. +4
    2 February 2015 05: 31
    The United States has officially declared the Black Sea-Caspian region a zone of its special energy interests
    They looked no further. Let the CO be there. days harder, and not look at someone else's.
  5. +2
    2 February 2015 05: 32
    And after all this, the US has the audacity to accuse Russia of totalitarianism ???
  6. +1
    2 February 2015 05: 42
    The world has long ceased to be ruled by capital. Hypocrisy and bigotry are the true kings of the world.
  7. +2
    2 February 2015 05: 56
    even they scare us all .. they are burying everything .. they have torn our economy to shreds .. they called the aggressors the aggressors .. just sadness .. laughing ..LIVING HAS BECOME BETTER .. LIVING HAS BECOME MORE FUN! (I.V. STALIN)
  8. Kakaktus
    0
    2 February 2015 06: 13
    Gotta put things in order, nigga must answer for everything bully
  9. 0
    2 February 2015 06: 14
    Earlier, the United States officially declared the Black Sea-Caspian region a zone of its special energy interests, as an alternative source of oil and gas products to the Gulf region.


    Make an adequate, tough response to all their attacks. And do not hesitate in the media. Like the DPRK. They said that the merikatosnya "mad dog", so it is so.
  10. Dumb
    +2
    2 February 2015 06: 19
    In my opinion, "controlled chaos" could not be created, and perhaps not
    controlled. Everything did not go as expected in Washington. Into the war
    with the outskirts, to this day, dream of involving Russia, and a long internal
    civil confrontation was not planned ... and even more so the loss of Crimea.
    And so they scream like they've been blown up - the supporters of flanking maneuvers, strikes in
    back, underminers of political will, economics and war lovers
    on someone else's territory and by someone else's hands. The true motives of the United States are known, the actions are read ...
    So - figs you!
  11. lg41
    +1
    2 February 2015 06: 56
    Two hundred years ago, Russian Emperor Paul I began to carry out a joint campaign with Napoleon in India, which contradicted the strategic plans of Great Britain.
    The result was the death of the Russian Tsar, organized by the British ambassador, and the war between Russia and France, which resulted in the strengthening of England.
  12. 0
    2 February 2015 07: 00
    60 people who signed the letter propose "stop the spiral of threats."

    This is only in Germany. But there are clear and sober heads in other EU countries, and in America itself. The difficulty lies in the fact that today's Western politicians do not want to listen to reasonable words. Everything again rests on American dictatorship and currying favor with the United States. This is where the main threat to peace lies.
  13. 0
    2 February 2015 12: 40
    60 people who signed the letter propose "stop the spiral of threats."negligible number. The people of the West understood that they were wrong when we came to their capitals over their corpses ... I have a friend in Canada. A pensioner, a former doctor from a traditional Christian family, a kind and positive person, and for all that, I sometimes find myself thinking that I am communicating with a follower of the satanic cult. He faithfully relays all the nonsense that pours into their heads their policies, the press, the financial and homosexual lobby. I am afraid that the brains of the population of the West are washed out reliably, thoroughly and forever.
  14. 0
    2 February 2015 15: 30
    The West really wants war ... But I'm afraid the West is not waiting for the result that will be in the end.