Armored car KAMAZ-53949

70
In 2013, the Kama Automobile Plant for the first time introduced its new development - the KAMAZ-53949 armored vehicle. This machine is designed to transport personnel and cargo, as well as to protect them from small weapons and explosive devices. Currently, experts are testing and refining this armored car. Approximately by 2018, it is planned to launch the mass production of new equipment in the interests of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Internal Affairs.



The KAMAZ-53949 armored car is a protected vehicle with the 4х4 wheel formula and a body that protects against bullets and explosive devices. According to some data, the machine is being developed as a platform on the basis of which modifications of equipment for various customers will be built. For example, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of Defense will be able to buy armored cars in various configurations, with different characteristics and capabilities that meet customer requirements.

The KAMAZ-53949 machine is being developed with extensive use of the designs of armored vehicles of the Typhoon family, which are currently being implemented by the Kama Automobile Plant. For this reason, the new armored car is often referred to as the “Typhoon”. In addition, it is known about the existence of the name "Patrol-A". According to some information, this name was given to a modification of the armored car for the internal troops and the Ministry of the Interior.

The KamAZ-53949 armored car must carry up to two tons of cargo or up to ten people, including the crew. This affected its size and weight. The length of the machine reaches 6,4 m, width - 2,5 m, height - 3,3 m. Clearance - 433 mm. The curb weight of the armored vehicle is 13,7 t, the total weight is 15,7 t. The dimensions and weight of the vehicle are shaped to meet the requirements for cargo carried by military transport aircraft and helicopters. The armored car can be transported by Il-76, An-124 or Mi-26 helicopters.

Armored car KAMAZ-53949


The machine is equipped with a body of the van type with the placement of volumes traditional for such equipment. In the front part, inside the armored hood, there is an engine, and the remaining volumes are allocated for the accommodation of the crew and the landing force or cargo. The hull conforms to the 3 level of the STANAG 4569 standard and protects the crew from 7.62x54R cartridge armor-piercing bullets. Protection against shrapnel of artillery shells or explosive devices is also provided.

The bottom of the case has a special V-shaped, designed to lead the blast wave to the side of the habitable volume. The possibility of saving the crew when 3 exploded kg of TNT under the wheel or in any part of the bottom is declared.

The case provides a set of doors for embarkation and disembarkation of the crew and landing force. The sides of the hull have four doors for the driver and three passengers, located in the front of the car. Another door is in the feed sheet. It should use the landing, located in the rear of the machine. In the roof of the troop compartment there are two hatches. All doors are equipped with bulletproof windows. To preserve the internal volumes of the glass blocks are placed on the outer surface of the housing. In addition, there are two glasses in the sides of the troop compartment. The driver has a large windshield.

Under the hood of the KAMAZ-53949 armored vehicle is a US-made Cummins 6ISBe 350 P-6 diesel engine with HP 350 power. The automatic transmission was supplied by the American company Allison. An independent hydropneumatic suspension with automatic wheel inflation is used in the undercarriage. The machine is equipped with bulletproof tubeless tires of dimension 14.00 R20. According to reports, tires with holes should provide traffic at speeds up to 50 km / h and allow to drive at least 50 km.





Armored car "Typhoon" on the highway should reach speeds of up to 100 km / h. Power reserve, according to some sources, at least 800-850 km.

Inside the armored hull of the car there are ten seats for the crew and landing force. To increase the level of protection, special “anti-mine” chairs are used, absorbing a part of the explosion energy under the machine. In front of the habitable volume are the driver and the commander. Behind them there are two more places for paratroopers. Six seats are installed along the sides of the troop compartment. Due to the use of a V-shaped hull bottom, the paratroopers should sit facing each other. Such a landing allowed the use of a relatively narrow aft door.

The dashboard of the armored vehicle is equipped with what is called the latest technology. To display information using two liquid crystal display. One is located on the dashboard, above the steering column, the second - to the right of the steering wheel. At the same time on the board saved indicators and switches familiar design.

For the convenience of landing in a relatively high cabin on the body provides a set of steps. In the early photographs of the prototype armored car, under the side doors, there were steps of a characteristic frame structure. In the later images, it can be seen that they were replaced by wide folding steps. Under the stern door on the hinge is mounted ladder. For landing and disembarking it must be lowered. In this case, the design of the aft ladder raises certain questions. For example, it is not entirely clear how it is proposed to lift it after the crew and the assault landing in the car and lower it during an emergency landing. It is possible that the design provides for certain mechanisms for raising and lowering the ladder, but there is no exact data on this matter yet.



On the roof of the hull, the KAMAZ-53949 armored car has a seat for installing a combat module with remote control. The machine can be armed with various small arms, up to large-caliber machine guns and automatic grenade launchers. In its current state, the Typhoonian does not have any embrasures for firing personal weapons. For self-defense and destruction of targets, apparently, it is proposed to use only the combat module.

To date, there is only one copy of the KamAZ-53949 armored car. Now this prototype passes preliminary tests. In addition, another experienced armored car is being built in Naberezhnye Chelny, which will later join the tests. No test results have yet been announced. Probably, the tests of the first prototype are at those stages when it is too early to sum up and draw conclusions.

It is known that the KamAZ-53949 armored car can be modified upon the request of one or other structures wishing to order it. Thus, the ground forces demand that the hydropneumatic suspension be replaced by a spring one, reduce the number of electronics, and take other measures to simplify the machine. The airborne troops, in turn, want to receive equipment with the possibility of landing from aircraft. At the request of other structures, other changes may be made to the structure, designed to bring the armored car in accordance with the requirements of the customer.

While the first prototype of the typhoon / Patrol-A armored vehicle is being tested, the project encountered unexpected difficulties. One of the features of the proposed machine is that, with a certain negative set of circumstances, it can put an end to all works. The fact is that in the design of the KAMAZ-53949 armored car are widely used foreign components. The engine and gearbox are purchased in the United States, suspension elements in Ireland, and “mine” seats come from the UK. Even tubeless tires purchased abroad, from the French company Michelin.

Thus, the further fate of the KAMAZ-53949 project to a certain extent depends on the plans of the leadership of a number of foreign countries. Currently, against the background of the Ukrainian crisis, some foreign countries have imposed sanctions on Russia. If Washington, London or Paris, in addition to the existing sanctions, decide to stop any military-technical cooperation with Russian enterprises, then the new domestic armored vehicle risks being left without some of the most important components.

According to the available data, to date, the Ministry of Industry and Trade and a number of specialized enterprises have prepared a program of actions aimed at replacing imported components in the new armored cars of the Kama Automobile Plant. Production of the necessary components and assemblies is planned to be deployed in the near future. Such news looks very optimistic, although it may be the reason for the emergence of questions. The use of new units, such as an engine or transmission, actually makes a basic vehicle from a base armored vehicle with different characteristics, which must go through the entire cycle of testing and refinement. How you plan to solve this problem is unknown.

In its current form, the KAMAZ-53949 armored car looks quite interesting. Judging from the published data, it is a convenient multi-purpose vehicle with protection against small arms and explosive devices. This technique can be used in conflict zones of low intensity, as well as when performing various special operations. In addition, a great advantage is the possibility of creating various modifications of the base machine, adapted for operation in various structures, both in the army and in the units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

Nevertheless, we should not forget that at the moment there is only one prototype of a promising armored car, which is being tested at landfill routes. Until the calculated characteristics are verified and confirmed, it will be possible to make only approximate assumptions about the future development of the project. The first stage of testing should be completed this year. Next, you will need to carry out a number of works, first of all, to correct the identified deficiencies. Serial production and supply of new armored vehicles is expected to expand to 2017-18 years. If the project does not face serious difficulties of a technical or political nature, then such deadlines look quite realistic. If you need to carry out a set of works on the replacement of imported components, then the timing of the completion of the project and the start of operation of serial equipment can significantly shift to the right.


On the materials of the sites:
http://arms-expo.ru/
http://русская-сила.рф/
http://vestnik-rm.ru/
http://wroom.ru/
http://twower.livejournal.com/
70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    29 January 2015 06: 59
    I will express my attitude not the fact that it is correct, but nonetheless ....
    1) the format of the armored car is very unsuccessful - a kind of ShiShiG in armor. But the shishiga in the troops didn’t take root, usually 1-2 in the unit and usually carries the guard. Because it is not clear that this is, on the one hand, like a truck with all the consequences, and on the other hand, it doesn’t work out much .... And on the other, it’s not a car of 15 tons that weighs like the same BMD ... or SPRUT
    2) to consider this car as a replacement for the traditional armored personnel carrier does not work due to the limited capabilities of this car on the roads and, in general, some parquet.
    3) as a machine for special forces - the weight is somewhat high ...
    So the only purpose for her comes to mind - a patrol car for explosives operating in hot spots (like our Chechnya - where there is no peace and no war, and trunks in your arms are unmeasured. It’s inappropriate to ride a tank, but without armor) But, I'm afraid the tiger cub has already taken this niche ...

    In general, a large number of projects in the middle class (from 5-7 to 15 tons) cause some surprise because of this comment expressed in paragraph 1). As well as the almost complete absence of light-class projects (2-5 tons) positioned as a replacement for UAZ with the possibility of installing armor protection and transportation by helicopter of the Mi-8 type (and its modifications)
    1. Alexey K.
      +21
      29 January 2015 07: 06
      "Foreign components are widely used in the design of the KamAZ-53949 armored car. The engine and gearbox are purchased in the USA, suspension elements in Ireland, and the mine-action seats come from the UK. Even tubeless tires were purchased abroad, from the French company Michelin." - what is this joke ?????
      An armored car for the Russian Armed Forces with Amer’s components ???? For me, the Tiger is better.
      1. +5
        29 January 2015 09: 02
        Quote: Alexey K.
        "Foreign components are widely used in the design of the KamAZ-53949 armored car. The engine and gearbox are purchased in the USA, suspension elements in Ireland, and the mine-action seats come from the UK. Even tubeless tires were purchased abroad, from the French company Michelin." - what is this joke ?????
        An armored car for the Russian Armed Forces with Amer’s components ???? For me, the Tiger is better.


        I agree. The tiger was very successful at the Arzamas factory for me.
        GAZ-233014 STS "Tiger"
        Classification light armored car
        Combat weight, t 5,3
        Front-wheel drive layout, four-wheel drive
        Crew, people. 2
        Landing, people 4-11
        1. +4
          29 January 2015 10: 27
          insafufa SU Today, 09:02 AM
          I agree. The tiger was very successful at the Arzamas factory for me.


          Why was it? he is TIGER-M Toko for what this unit? with 3 class of guest protection (i.e. maximum stops the usual 5,45 and 600 gr tr under the bottom

          photo without comments (clickable)
          1. +9
            29 January 2015 12: 32
            Our infantry is conically afraid to sit in the armor better on the armor so you will die without torment from a sniper bullet or fragments of grenades.
            How the commander of a combat vehicle did not understand the guys from the infantry
            Yes, in the BTR 70 it was dangerous to go inside; gasoline caught fire instantly, but the diesel fuel burns for a long time; there is a lot of time to go outside.
            I drove on a TIGER and saw how the armor can withstand a direct hit of 12.7 from a machine gun. It saves without problems. When hitting an anti-personnel mine, the tiger only had its tire torn off.
            During his service in Chechnya, he saw how infantry blows off armor while undermining MON. 50 out of 8 people didn’t squeeze out although they were sitting in armored plates, but the BMP crew remained intact and not harmful.
            1. 0
              29 January 2015 14: 08
              insafufa SU Today, 12:32 AM
              sitting in armor is better on armor so you die without torment



              And what is there to sit in, sit out in? if this miracle takes neither 5,45PP nor 7,62

              I drove a TIGER and saw how the armor can withstand a direct hit of 12.7 from a PC machine gun


              I wonder how it is? What kind of Tiger model was it, what year and when did the PC have 12,7 bullets?
              1. +3
                29 January 2015 15: 57
                for unenlightened PCs 7,62 x 54R
                The tiger is available in various modifications of the MO from unarmored to armored to level 6a

                And despite the fact that in the experimental version they brought to Chechnya with qivlar coating from the inside to reduce the number of fragments with broken armor. With a Tiger it is better than without it, it’s better to appear better for God's sake I’ll be happy without fish and the Tiger will come down
              2. +4
                29 January 2015 18: 22
                Here one "expert" on weapons regretted that the PKK cannot be made with a folding stock. Because The return spring is in the butt. Do not be surprised.
          2. +1
            29 January 2015 14: 35
            Begging, again on the new pro defense class, which MO ordered this and there were options for the sixth grade ...
            1. +2
              29 January 2015 14: 41
              S
              TALGRAD76 (1) SU Today, 14:35 ↑
              Begging, again on a new pro protection class


              The main car was supposed to be Iveco LMV M65


              we don’t blame the military-industrial complex, we are talking about a specific TIGER-M model and there are questions for the Defense Ministry (why did they start buying it when Iveco was already identified as the main one) both for the Tigers and for the same T-72B3 and so on - to support whom?

              There were no options, they are! it’s weak in the counter - the truth is that the AMZ is no longer such a reverent interest from the military in connection with disruptions in supplies, work on Boomer, etc.
      2. +4
        29 January 2015 09: 18
        I would not be surprised if he also has imported armor, since it "corresponds to level 3 of the STANAG 4569 standard and protects the crew from armor-piercing bullets of the 7.62x54R cartridge." Kamazovsky in this car, it seems, only bolts, nuts and a screwdriver assembly, which allows you to call this product "domestic".
      3. +4
        29 January 2015 10: 10
        Quote: Alexey K.
        An armored car for the Russian Armed Forces with Amer’s components ????


        Recently there was infa on the topic that this "Typhoon" will not go into the series precisely because of the large number of foreign components.
    2. +5
      29 January 2015 07: 20
      You attach too much importance to this model as an armored personnel carrier, but in fact a machine for delivering military personnel to a combat area to replace the same GAZ-66 or to prevent a soldier from blowing up armor with an explosion.
      1. +3
        29 January 2015 12: 03
        Quote: APASUS
        You attach too much importance to this model as an armored personnel carrier, but in fact a machine for delivering military personnel to a combat area to replace the same GAZ-66 or to prevent a soldier from blowing up armor with an explosion.

        An armored personnel carrier is a vehicle for delivering servicemen to a combat area. What is at war with them in the field is already an infantry fighting vehicle. Just 66 for delivery - too small - or you place people or take the load - it is small. Therefore, "Federal" or "Typhoon" have a meaning, like a little Tiger, but this is not so - I don't even know. Weighs like a "federal", but fits like a tiger cub ... A little illogical. Therefore, I think that this machine is already very specific ... and will not enter the army en masse.
        1. +2
          29 January 2015 21: 18
          Quote: tchoni
          BTR - this is the machine for the delivery of military personnel to the combat zone. The fact that they are fighting in the field is already an infantry fighting vehicle.

          Only here are all the modern APCs in terms of armament for the classic infantry fighting vehicles. The BTR-82 is clearly in service for more than one infantry delivery and cover of columns.
          1. 0
            6 February 2015 10: 08
            And here we run into a contradiction: the BTR-82’s armament complex allows infantry to support infantry, but armor (more precisely, its absence) prevents it from escorting ...
    3. +4
      29 January 2015 10: 23
      tchoni SU Today, 06:59 AM

      In general, a large number of projects cause some bewilderment.


      Is it doubtful? - hmm, it's really cool, until Taburetukin the concept of mine protection, etc., as well as work in this area, was absent as a class, an acre TIGER from the military-industrial complex

      Thanks to Taburetkin and his IVECO LMV 65 - after that the work went.
      1. +2
        29 January 2015 12: 22
        Understand correctly. It is the tonnage of projects that causes confusion. They are obtained due to their weight "and not a candle to God and not a devil of a poker" ... With great success, you can improve mine protection and visibility of existing armored personnel carriers and not paritsoo ...
        1. +1
          29 January 2015 14: 10
          What the MO ordered is what they receive, and the MO requires cars of all formats from 4x4 to 8x8, no one will transport cargo, for this there are modular typhoons 6x6 and 8x8x. The armored personnel carrier can’t be easily finished, you need to sculpt at least a V-shaped bottom. What about the Tiger, the car is not bad, but 6A protection class in a single copy, mine protection can not be compared with the typhoon. Here, Typhoons really have problems with imported components, they won’t be able to put anything of their own there for at least 2-3 years, but after these 2-3 years they promise to localize production by 95%, they even solved everything by bulletproof tires with pumping, production even for large batches of cars it is unprofitable, so the state will sponsor this business.
        2. +2
          29 January 2015 14: 13
          tchoni SU Today, 12:22 ↑
          Get it right


          We understand that it is healthy and MO is not needed; they don’t know where and where to apply, for Veniks please, but they love URALAZ

          But what is TIGER-M for? better off is IVECO LMV- but on the other hand I will repeat thanks to Taburetkin and K

          But the armored personnel carrier does not need to be dug, it is necessary to save Boomer, etc., otherwise I feel we’ll still have a long ride on the next modifications of the BTR-82A and so on.although I liked the last modification of the A1 with the tower from the Petrel, especially inside wink
      2. +1
        29 January 2015 13: 23
        Considering the "tiger", one must remember what came before him, talked with the driver of the tiger from the St. Petersburg OMON, so he moved from the 131st shift with glamorous bars on the windows from the demonstrators, and someone in the detachment moved from unarmored UAZs, I think "Typhoonok" would have saved the URALs, who find it difficult on city streets.
        As for the army, here is my personal experience: the predecessor of the BRDM, in a conversation with the driver from the detachment, the quality "GAS" IS QUALITY "GAS" for some reason criticizing the tigers at VO, and recalling the BRDM2 no one stops at this, so that we take it for an equal value , the advantages of the BRDM2 are the best standard armament, the protection of the shooter (although in a real battle, target designation from the outside is needed to quickly search for a target), a rational angle of the location of the armor, overcoming water obstacles by swimming (they have never used it), and the wheels of a dutik (they did not release). Yes, the tiger is not quite that, but it's time to change the BRDM-ku and not for a "tiger" and a "typhoon" but for something like a "boomerang" 4x4.
        1. 0
          29 January 2015 21: 25
          Quote: UNKNOWN
          it's time to change not to "tiger" and "typhoon" but to something like a "boomerang" 4x4.

          Sorry, but the only main reason for the general enthusiasm for 4x4 armored cars is their cheapness and the ability to start mass production. A boomerang (most likely) costs MUCH more expensive. I apologize for cynicism, but in conditions when it is urgent to put into operation a mass of BM its cost and man-hours for construction become no less important criteria than security. And to increase armor is constantly pointless - Western classmates die from landmines in Afghanistan and Iraq, regardless of the amount of armor.
          And then, the main combat mission of an armored car is safe (in relation to fire from small arms and small improvised military vehicles) infantry transportation.
        2. 0
          30 January 2015 10: 15
          Quote: UNKNOWN
          talked with a tiger driver from the St. Petersburg riot police,

          DO NOT confuse rotational vehicles (ATN-ki), which were originally designed to transport riot police to the place of duty during measures to suppress group violations of public order and liquidate riots. And "Tiger", to take for the same OMON, is a transport for actions against armed criminals, ensuring the protection of convoys of the Interior Ministry forces, in situations of possible fire resistance.
    4. 0
      29 January 2015 13: 29
      Quote: tchoni
      almost complete absence of light-class projects (2-5 tons) positioned as a replacement for UAZ vehicles with the possibility of installing armor protection and transportation by a Mi-8 helicopter

      We must follow the example of the Germans and create something similar on the basis of UAZ-ik from domestic components and components.
      G-Wagon 280 CDI LAPV 5.4
      (Light Armored Patrol Vehicle - Light Armored Patrol Car)

      The modular armor system helps to quickly replace damaged areas, and also includes a plate on the bottom, which will reflect the blast wave when a car explodes in a mine.

      1. +1
        29 January 2015 14: 13
        Well, at the expense of the chassis based on the UAZ, the idea is dubious, but a car of such a plan, as you wish, is already a "scorpion", while it is being rolled around on the southern border of the Southern Military District.
        1. 0
          29 January 2015 14: 21
          Quote: Dog of war
          Well, at the expense of the chassis on the basis of UAZ idea dubious,

          a larger concept based on the Mercedes-Benz Unimog: LAPV 7.X
          In that case, why not use components from KamAZ?
        2. 0
          29 January 2015 14: 36
          Quote: Dog of war
          but a car of such a plan, as you wish, is already a "scorpion"

          You mean UAZ 3151 "Scorpion"
          or Scorpio LSHA-B from Zashchita corporation?
          1. +1
            29 January 2015 14: 49
            Of course not UAZ, otherwise I would not have written that the idea of ​​UAZ is doubtful.
        3. 0
          30 January 2015 10: 18
          Quote: Dog of war
          to the account of the chassis based on UAZ

          Such a car already exists. It is called "Esaul" based on the "Patriot". BUT the placement of fighters in full gear still leaves much to be desired.
    5. +3
      29 January 2015 14: 30
      The article is not about anything! This gadget has recently been removed as a potential product for the Russian Armed Forces and all because of components, and not only. Yesterday's article.
      1. +1
        29 January 2015 15: 08
        Quote: juborg
        Of course not UAZ, otherwise I would not have written that the idea of ​​UAZ is doubtful.

        Scorpion LSHA-B from Zashchita corporation is equipped with Andoria 0501 ADCR engine.
        Manufacturer ANDORIA SA (Andryukhov, Poland).
        What is Russia's relationship with Poland?
        In addition, it is not known what kind of transmission is used on the machine.
        So given the general sanctions and embargoes, Scorpio is unlikely to be accepted.
        1. +2
          29 January 2015 15: 11
          What do you want? YaMZ to push there so that the hump on the hood was even larger than that of the Tiger? There will be a suitable engine - they will deliver. Here, read - http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/17781/
          1. +1
            29 January 2015 15: 58
            Quote: Dog of war
            Here, read - http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/17781/

            I read in LiveJournal.
            And about Scorpio in Military Review posted at different times 3-4 articles.
            Here is a comment to one of the articles with which I fully agree:
            Quote: zeleznijdorojnik
            You whatever you want - and I minus - until the army will be supplied with equipment from incomprehensible factories in the amount of several dozen, and not specially created for tasks, but deeply sawn civilian - where, fucking it, unification - imagine yourself as a deputy technician of a battalion that has GAZ Tigers "and" Vodniki "with American diesel engines, KAMAZ" Typhoons "and" Bulats "(and they are in the army - I saw them myself), URAL" Typhoons "," Bear ", Ivek" Lynx ", this most unknown" Scorpion ", yes the usual GAZ Sadko, KAMAZ, URALs are also loaded, and in storage there are also ZIL-130/131 with shishigs and 53 lawns - this is okay - where can you get so many different parts from - whether it's the case before - one ZMZ-shny engine - 4 and 8 cylinders, and one diesel Uralovsky ...
            And in the case of hostilities ???
            Military experience requires us to unify - and the industry drives the devil knows what.
            There were earlier developments, there were some good ones - they chose the best from them and put them on the conveyor.
            In the end, it will turn out like in the First World War - 214 names of various automotive equipment ...
            1. 0
              29 January 2015 18: 23
              "Quote: zeleznijdorojnik" this is where let me find out such a part that there are at least 3 of the named "varieties" of armored vehicles there at the same time? If we take the whole army into account, then there is nothing surprising in small batches, of all the named ARMOR vehicles, only the Tiger and Iveco passed the state and were adopted, the rest are being tested in units.
              1. 0
                29 January 2015 19: 01
                Quote: Dog of war
                Let me find out that there are at least 3 of the named "varieties" of armored vehicles at the same time?

                I propose to look wider: in the scale of the country.
                Agree that suppliers will have a very hard time, especially if you need to get imported components.
                In addition to scarce parts - imported engines are more demanding on the quality of fuel.
                That is, specifically for Iveco (for example) they will order a couple of tanks with EURO 5.

                Quote: Dog of war
                only Tiger and Iveco were adopted,

                with Lynx / Iveco incomprehensible situation. There was a rumor that they would be removed from service.

                Quote: Dog of war
                the rest are run-in parts.

                And there is.
                1. 0
                  29 January 2015 19: 12
                  On a national scale, the machines are simply being run-in, therefore, small parties, by no means all will be accepted into service (the Ministry of Defense disowns all its hands from Vodniks and Bulatov), ​​those that are adopted will switch to our components, as I have already said, those Typhoons-K will be in series with our components in 2-3 years. And the same Typhoon-K or Scorpio certainly does not need any "better fuel". And Iveki, if my memory serves me correctly, almost everything has been sent from the moment of its receipt for storage.
                  1. +1
                    29 January 2015 20: 08
                    Naryl just now.
                    Written in the summer of 2012 in the diary of Denis Mokrushin:
                    For the needs of the Ministry of Defense for cars installed Russian equipment.
                    With the Polish company Andoria-Mot signed a license agreement for the production of the engine in Russia.
                    The contract closes all questions on the supply of the motor for the security forces of our country.
                    Now the release of the engine is at the stage of the SKD assembly.

                    If the "Scorpion" is accepted for the supply of the Ministry of Defense and large-scale production within two years at the production facilities of the corporation, 100% production of the engine will be established.
                    As a result, the Corporation "Zashchita" will provide full service for the entire ten-year life cycle of the vehicle and its utilization.

                    Engine characteristics on the site of the Corporation "Protection":
                    http://www.zashchita.ru/insight/diesel_engine/
        2. 0
          29 January 2015 20: 50
          Quote: Mister X
          Quote: juborg
          Of course not UAZ, otherwise I would not have written that the idea of ​​UAZ is doubtful.

          Scorpion LSHA-B from Zashchita corporation is equipped with Andoria 0501 ADCR engine.
          Manufacturer ANDORIA SA (Andryukhov, Poland).
          What is Russia's relationship with Poland?
          In addition, it is not known what kind of transmission is used on the machine.
          So given the general sanctions and embargoes, Scorpio is unlikely to be accepted.

          I DIKO I'm sorry, BUT THE QUOTATION IS NOT MY.
          1. 0
            29 January 2015 21: 25
            Quote: juborg
            I DIKO I'm sorry, BUT THE QUOTATION IS NOT MY.

            I'm sorry.
            I do not know how it happened ...
        3. wanderer_032
          0
          30 January 2015 14: 43
          Quote: Mister X
          Scorpion LSHA-B from Zashchita corporation is equipped with Andoria 0501 ADCR engine.
          Manufacturer ANDORIA SA (Andryukhov, Poland).


          Let it be known to you that Bldg. Zashchita bought a license from the Poles for the production of the Andoria diesel engine.
          In addition, the Zashchita corporation, according to all estimates, should start its own production of these diesel engines.
          This video was posted on the network in 2012.



          And on the website of the building. "Zashita" dv "Andoria" is presented as a product of the enterprise.
          http://www.zashchita.ru/diesel_engine/

          So all the talk that Polish motors can already be put aside. They are ours already.
          On the machine itself I will say as a professional driver with many years of experience.
          If I had to choose between "Tiger" or "Scorpio", I would choose "Scorpio".
          This machine is very simple in terms of materiel parts, it uses well-developed and standardized automotive components in the domestic / global automotive industry. That for automotive equipment of this class is a good indicator, because spare parts can be obtained almost everywhere where you have to ride this car.
          Also, it is probably much cheaper in mass production. In addition, it is also much more technologically advanced (easier).
          In addition, the car significantly exceeds the UAZ vehicle by an order of magnitude in terms of driving performance.
          And the car "Tiger" in terms of us-wu materiel and ease of operation, is in no way inferior to him in terms of running characteristics. Because on the "Tiger" vehicle, in the transmission and running gear, units and parts from the armored personnel carrier of domestic production are used, which require high qualifications and skills from the driver during repairs.
          The entire line of "Scorpio" cars is very successful for a car of this class. This is a truly complete, multi-purpose vehicle.
          1. 0
            2 February 2015 13: 39
            Quote: wanderer_032
            Let it be known to you that Bldg. Zashchita bought a license from the Poles for the production of the Andoria diesel engine.

            Monsieur Wanderer!
            It is very kind of you to decide to share information.
            Regarding the license for the production of engines, I also posted the same link a day before your comment.
            This is a total of 2 comments above yours.
    6. +3
      29 January 2015 18: 20
      Quote: tchoni
      So the only purpose for her comes to mind - a patrol car for explosives operating in hot spots (like our Chechnya - where there is no peace and no war, and the trunks on one’s hands are unmeasured.

      The patrol AFV, according to the technical characteristics of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Internal Troops, has already been created and tested --- this is the SMP-3 "Medved" .. 100% of components and assemblies of domestic production and good ballistic and mine protection ...


    7. +3
      29 January 2015 18: 40
      Quote: tchoni
      1) of this comment. As well as the almost complete absence of light-class projects (2-5 tons) positioned as a replacement for the UAZ with the possibility of installing armor protection and transportation by Mi-8 helicopter (and its modifications)

      to create such a BM with acceptable indicators for ballistic and mine protection .. much more difficult than heavy and medium armored cars ....
      1. Modern composites and alloys are necessary ..
      2.compact engine, automatic transmission, and with this we have a problem in Russia ...

      Corporation "Zashchita", tried to occupy this segment, with its BM "Scorpion" ... but there is a Polish engine ... and in general, these devices are clearly not structurally modified ...

      now it’s overdue, the creation for the RF Armed Forces of the registered multipurpose armored car ... of a modular design with the wheel formula 4x4 and 6x6 ...
      the attempt was quite successful - this is the "Wolf" theme, it is only necessary to simplify the suspension ((abandon the variable ground clearance ..))) and strengthen mine protection ((although according to the last info ... this has already been done
      but)))
      but for some reason the topic is already 2 years old, not covered at all in the military-industrial complex ... maybe it’s completely closed ???
      1. +1
        30 January 2015 03: 56
        To be honest, I am in a slight bewilderment, a universal "wolf" I would accept the troops with my eyes closed, and flaws during operation are at least better than Kamaz, which is half bourgeois ... the idea itself is creative - modularity - for "us" that's for sure.
  2. +1
    29 January 2015 07: 22
    Shamanov talked about some kind of fantastic car, isn't that it? if so, then this is the usual MDI, of which there are many that are better and are already being exploited, but Putin said that we should be a cut above and better to be ...
  3. +1
    29 January 2015 07: 46
    Specialists tell me why you need dual wipers?
  4. +3
    29 January 2015 07: 53
    For a mass of 15 tons, the running 4x4 is weak, it would be logical to use the 6x6, otherwise the loads are very large, especially if the explosions occur, the machine will stupidly fail due to the breakdown of one of the wheels.
    And yes, the American engine and gearbox are not good. It’s possible to develop and install your own seats and tires, and it will be much more difficult to select an engine and transmission from your own.
    1. +1
      29 January 2015 14: 17
      And did you think that the machine after undermining 6kg of hexogen will be able to conduct a normal fight? So I will disappoint you, even KAMAZ 63969 will not go anywhere after the blast - https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/15599/94845085.ff/0_11bd37_df92571e_XL.jpg
  5. +3
    29 January 2015 08: 10
    Competitor "Tiger" ??? Only more and more expensive, and the imported chassis from the military will cause skepticism - who buys components for the "defense" from a potential enemy ?! We have amused the fuel tanks at the back, for show and on each side, I hope they are protected, otherwise the crew will look pale in case of an attack. I think this car will remain in a small series, an expensive toy, if they do not find a replacement for imports
    1. +2
      29 January 2015 12: 07
      No, the competitor of the "Tiger" is an armored UAZ. Which, as far as I remember, is three times cheaper.

      KamAZ-53949 is a car that is protected from explosions with all the consequences
      1. 0
        30 January 2015 10: 22
        Shovels, you are wrong! The armored UAZ-Patriot (but Esaul) is not a competitor to the Tiger. I didn’t even stand nearby !!!!!!!!
  6. +1
    29 January 2015 08: 21
    Yes, with tanks finally can not be thought out ,,, inside oh how hot it will be if that))))
  7. 0
    29 January 2015 10: 02
    Under the hood of the KamAZ-53949 armored car is an American-made Cummins 6ISBe 350 P-6 diesel engine with a power of 350 hp. An automatic transmission was supplied by the American company Allison. In the chassis, an independent hydropneumatic suspension with automatic pumping of wheels is used.

    Hands tear off what you have set up AMERICAN equipment! On KAMAZ, the designers began to look at the wrong PLANTS .. so turn their heads away!
  8. +1
    29 January 2015 10: 03
    Perhaps additional tanks. I also don’t understand what niche this vehicle will occupy. Surely a competitor to "Tiger". If you create or rather occupy a certain niche in armored vehicles, now there is a place for a patrol car with a capacity of up to 8 people, but not as a weight of 13 tons (based on the "typhoon" platform). And so they riveted a bunch of everyone, "wolf", for example.
    1. +2
      29 January 2015 13: 06
      I did not quite understand the howl of the previous comments, before you is the PROTOTYPE of a specialized MRAP car and its niche has long been defined and has nothing to do with it. Unlike the financial resources spent on the same "Tigers". Here is a miracle device ("Tiger") is not for village not to the city turned out (not MRAP not a replacement for the BRDM). Not ballistic protection, not mobility, and can not swim, we do not remember about the explosion, while weighs not sour. One pleases, which is better!? iveki. But "iveko" armored light car, and you can't call it a "tiger", with its suspension from an armored personnel carrier. Readers don't like the tanks (provided they are protected, I think the location is very good), but where do you think they should be placed? under the armor "out of harm's way"? Imported components? but this is a prototype, that is, something that the industry has yet to master, as for the units, our auto industry has not imagined new products for 30 years, the maximum development of a Western-style series. not small) then special vehicles (which MRAPs are) the pleasure is not cheap, and only special forces are armed with them. From world practice, it is considered normal if a kilogram of a MRAP costs the same as a kilogram of a tank of the same weight.
      1. 0
        30 January 2015 10: 25
        Quote: Argon
        not mobility

        For you, a speed of 120 km on the highway is not mobility? (personal experience!) Passage through the taiga at the proper level (though the UAZ track does not fit, this is where the hunters cut the road, for example).
  9. +1
    29 January 2015 10: 08
    Good health to all.
    In May 2015 (May 19.05 - May 21.05) in the Czech Republic in Brno there will be an international exhibition of arms IDET (http://www.bvv.cz/idet/idet-2015) Let's send your goods. See others and show themselves.
  10. +1
    29 January 2015 10: 32
    yes, forget YOU about this car with an Americanos engine and the same gearbox
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    29 January 2015 11: 07
    installation of fuel tanks in the corners of a car, in the area of ​​arches - ingenious, a masterpiece. When will these designers, engineers start to hit with these boots?
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. +2
    29 January 2015 11: 29
    It seems to me that the army needs a simple, reliable, well-protected armored personnel carrier with extensive use of components and assemblies of serial vehicles in its design. Something like KAMAZ "Shot" and "Bulat"
    Indeed, when a disaster comes in the form of any armed conflict, we use the same tented, unprotected KAMAZ trucks and URALs for transportation. Which subsequently overgrow with all sorts of awkward metal sheets and the hope that all this piling will protect the soldiers from bullets and fragments. By the way, we can observe this situation now in the armed conflict in Ukraine, when the soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are trying to remake ordinary trucks into at least some kind of armored personnel carriers.
  15. +1
    29 January 2015 11: 57
    The thickness of the double-glazed windows, the thoughtfulness of many things, in particular the passive protection of people, is impressive. Frustrating - a large abundance of imported components and assemblies. It is necessary that everything was produced at our factories, but it was imperative that it was better than imported.
  16. +1
    29 January 2015 12: 10
    So the rally KAMAZ from domestic only Chagin with Kabirov
  17. +2
    29 January 2015 12: 23
    looking at this product of the Russian military automobile industry from Amerov’s spare parts, I always find myself thinking about it ... well, the filling isn’t ours, but at least they could have looked normal. The Turks made a car, it’s kind of expensive to see, but with us it’s as if everything is being trimmed with an ax, and then they say, in the TTX war it is important, not the look. It is of course, but then the question arises, if the insides are not ours, but the look as if before and during the design something was smoked, which side did the domestic auto industry to this product?
    1. +1
      29 January 2015 12: 36
      As far as I know, KamAZ collects the insides. At least engines, for sure
  18. +1
    29 January 2015 12: 39
    Of course, the car is in the above privacy, and the idea of ​​mine defense is generally worthy. But for me, some kind of inflection is planned - there are no developments of new light (not armored) and lightly armored vehicles ((Although if I am mistaken, I will be happy to learn about them!
    Yes, of course, security is very important, but what about transportability? Do not forget about the speed of movement and the economy of light equipment.
    Sometimes, it seems to me, something less secure is needed, but faster delivered and deployed, well-armed and fast))
  19. +1
    29 January 2015 13: 07
    It looks good, I hope to do a good job soldiers.
  20. Dimetrodreamer
    +1
    29 January 2015 15: 44
    Cool stuff!

    In this case, the American hammer or cho there they have nothing at all! wink
    1. +1
      29 January 2015 16: 23
      Come on laughing don't suck up bully ...
      In general, personally, I don’t understand dancing in the circle of different MDIs, is this a trend? fashion? why all over the world different manufacturers roll out their bundles?
  21. +1
    29 January 2015 17: 24
    And what about the VPK-3927 "Wolf"? It seems like a replacement for the Tiger was planned, well, or, at least, in addition, a variable clearance, modularity and so on, even the civilian version seemed to be sculpted over time, and silence ..
  22. +1
    29 January 2015 18: 50
    Forgive us zatsev, our grandfathers, people of the 50s-60s of the last century.
    We pissed off our science and production.
    "OUR" armored car by 40% (and - BASIC ....), not ours.
    And so in everything (besides Su-27 and its brethren, there are still Zoviet developers and systems!).
    JO_PA!
    Greetings to the "HURA-patriots" immenno to them with an Anglo-Saxon accent, their enemies ...
  23. 0
    29 January 2015 22: 30
    Dear sentence signed-imported components, this destroys all the advantages, if any
  24. 0
    30 January 2015 02: 18
    Quote: angel of hell
    Here one "expert" on weapons regretted that the PKK cannot be made with a folding stock. Because The return spring is in the butt. Do not be surprised.

    If this "expert" is not in the know, then the RPKS has long been in service with the Airborne Forces.
  25. Miosnytneer
    0
    5 March 2015 18: 04
    Something he is not impressive, wadded, as if to say, or something, with his size.