Battleships of heaven

46
Battleships of heaven


Airships of the Great War - as Count Zeppelin overtook "Russia"

If we say that by the beginning of the Great War the sky of Europe belonged to Germany - exaggeration in the military-strategic plan will not be very strong. In 1914 aviation she took only the first steps, and while the short-lived, but the booming ballooning flourished, and the Second Reich had no equal in this area - the silvery silhouettes of German zeppelins reigned almost undividedly in the clouds. Russia, by the way, and other allies in the Entente, had almost nothing to answer. Despite the fact that the Ministry of War had a special commission on aeronautics, pigeon mail and watchtowers, they were skeptical about the construction of airships for a long time. Although they had every chance to become a pioneer and leader in global aeronautics. The project of the airship, almost identical to that which terrified the inhabitants of Europe in 1914, was launched in Russia 20 years before the creation of the first zeppelin. But first, officials decided that its military significance seemed "fortunate", and after the appearance of zeppelins - not relevant.

For the sake of justice, it must be admitted that regarding the role of aviation in a future war, the Russian leadership was not mistaken, and by the beginning of the Great War, Russia had the largest fleet. Due to undeveloped industry and dependence on imports, it’s true that Russian aviation soon fell behind both its allies and its opponents, but that was already completely different. story.

Too early too late

The most advanced technological type of airship in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was the so-called zeppelin — a dirigible rigid scheme, first launched into mass production by the German graph Ferdinand von Zeppelin and his aeronautical company Luftshiffbau Zeppelin GmbH. The main design feature of airships of this type was the presence of a metal (less commonly wooden) frame-truss, fitted with a gas-tight casing, under which the carrier gas was pumped. For their time, zeppelins were genuine air battleships: their length could reach almost 250 meters, and the maximum diameter of the carrying case was more than 40 meters.

Despite the undoubted manufacturability and increased reliability of this type of airships, already at the beginning of the twentieth century they began to “tread on the heels” of the airship of a semi-rigid scheme. It is distinguished by the presence in the lower part of a special “boat-shaped” set of trusses from the trusses, which prevents the “flashing” of a huge bearing body in the rest of the truss. Nowadays, it is the airship of semi-rigid construction, in view of the appearance of new, especially durable materials for a gas-tight hull shell, recognized as the most progressive type.

Russia had all the chances to become one of the first countries that managed to make the airships not only an innovative, but also an industrial phenomenon.

One of the first inventors in the world who proposed to introduce tough and semi-rigid schemes into the production of airships became a subject of the Russian Empire, a Serb by nationality Ogneslav Stepanovich Kostovich. As the author of many truly breakthrough inventions in various branches of technology, Ogneslav Kostovich, 20 years before Ferdinand von Zeppelin, tried to build a large dirigible airship in Russia.


Ogneslav (Ignatius) Kostovich with the engine of his invention. Photo: forum.guns.ru


Kostovich's airship, which he symbolically called “Russia”, was to have a record scale for his time - a body with a volume of 5 thousand cubic meters. meters, the length of 64 m and the maximum diameter of 12 m. In the process, the inventor was able not only to formulate, but also bring to the beginning of the industrial cycle two more large-scale technical ideas - the creation of an opposed carburetor internal combustion engine and the production of cemented aviation arborite plywood (canvas, glued from several layers of plywood laid under different directions, due to which it is not subject to warping and cracking). In Russia, none of these ideas — neither the airship, the engine, nor even the arborite plywood — have found military use.

Kostovic's carburetor engine, which has electrical ignition and a technically advanced opposed (at an angle of 180 °) arrangement of the working cylinders, appeared in the 1883 year. A similar engine with in-line cylinders was created in Germany at the end of 1885, in the workshop of engineers Gottlieb Daimler and Wilhelm Maybach. In less than five years, Daimler and Maybach became co-owners of the largest automobile and engine-building concerns. Under the guarantees of Daimler and Maybach, any of the German banks could issue the largest loan.

At the same time in Russia, inventor Kostovich “fought like a fish about ice”, intrusively offering his airship, engine, and even unique plywood to various government departments, including the military. In the end, in order to somehow exist, Kostovich began to produce plywood-arborite barrels for wine and chests - only such products turned out to be in demand. It is curious that at the end of the 30 of the XX century one of the best multipurpose (used as a bomber, fighter-interceptor and reconnaissance aircraft) of the Second World War - the British Mosquito DH98 - was created from aviation plywood, of almost the same composition as arborite.

In Russia, the largest innovative project for the construction of the semi-rigid airship “Russia”, which could have become a true locomotive for the domestic engine-building and aviation technologies with proper state financial participation, has, alas, collapsed.

The construction of the airship began in a semi-handicraft manner at the Okhta Admiralty Shipyard in St. Petersburg in the year 1882. Due to chronic underfunding, the work went slowly; the development of related technologies (engine, aviation materials) was practically not provided. Only seven years later, in 1889, almost all the main parts of the airship were ready for assembly. The aviation boxer engine, simultaneously created by Ogneslav Kostovich, worked steadily, developing the rated power of the 80 l. with. that was more than enough for the calculated power of the airship.

However, the elements intervened at that moment - at the end of 1889, the storm wind from the Gulf of Finland destroyed the assembly shed for the airship. About 55 thousand rubles were required for the restoration - the amount compared to the almost 500 thousand rubles already allocated for the project is almost ridiculous. Kostovich had to once again turn to the military department. The verdict of the commission of the Chief Engineering Department of the War Ministry, adopted at the request of Ogneslav Kostovich, taking into account the money spent, became an example of bureaucratic idiocy: "A giant controlled balloon represents a very fortunate military significance."

As a result, it was decided not to allocate funds for the restoration of the hangar, and the first in the world semi-rigid airship "Russia" was never collected.

After 20 years, in the 1910 year of the “Russia” section, still preserved by the inventor, were still fit for assembly. But for another request of Kostovich, the Ministry of Defense responded differently: “Assembling the airship of the inventor Kostovich is currently inexpedient: both the balloon itself in its idea and the engine for it are of historical interest, since they are far surpassed by balloons used in practice in Europe” .

Of course, that was the case. The production of aeronautical ships, of course, did not stand still in Western countries, while the details of the first Russian airship for decades have been gathering dust at a warehouse in St. Petersburg.

Chasing Zeppelin

The project of the semi-rigid airship Ogneslav Kostovich was, of course, not the only one in Russia. Simply, thanks to his personal charisma, he advanced much further than other projects proposed to the Ministry of War. “Russia” officials were able to ditch only at the exit from the factory shop, they managed to push other design endeavors “on the shelf” even at the “paper stage”.

The military projects did not receive support from the creation of controlled balloon designs D. N. Chernushenko, A. V. Vlazhko, M. I. Malykhina, K. Ya. Danilevsky, I. A. Matyunina, and P. D. Chernova. Successfully managed to “hack” the project of the all-metal airship K. E. Tsiolkovsky, with a report on which he spoke in the 1887 year.

It was only against the background of the impressive success of the Ferdinand von Zeppelin airships that the Russian military department was forced to change its "fortunetelling" position. However, it was already difficult to “catch up”, and even more so “overtake” German aircraft-building technologies.

Von Zeppelin's first airship flew 2 on July 1900. Despite the predictions of infantile "experts" - and in Germany there were also a lot of them - about the deliberate doom of the idea of ​​a controlled aerostat, the launch of the first zeppelin was very successful. All the calculated characteristics were confirmed, moreover, the device convincingly demonstrated good handling. In October, the 1906 of the year successfully flew the third, the 135-meter zeppelin LZ2.

Ferdinand von Zeppelin was greatly assisted by King William Wilhelm II of Württemberg (not to be confused with the Kaiser of the German Empire). The German government has allocated a large tranche for the construction of a new zeppelin building hangar and provided the inventor with state guarantees for bank loans. Germany made a big step forward.


Zeppelins on the maneuvers of the German army. 1905 year. Photo: Imperial War Museums


In 1907, the Russian military also “matured”, finally, to a strategic decision in the field of airship construction. The Main Engineering Directorate of the Military Ministry has created a special commission chaired by Lieutenant-General N. L. Kirpicheva to develop the project of a large airship. It included Major General A. M. Kovanko, Colonel E. V. Fedorov, Colonel V. N. Naidenov, famous aerodynamics N. E. Zhukovsky, mathematician and shipbuilder A. N. Krylov and other scientists.

The production of airships started only in 1908 year. The first of the aircraft called "Training" was designed by Captain A. I. Shabsky. It was a primitive small airship of soft construction, repeating de facto the basics of German airship 20-year-old. Flights on it were carried out in the 1909 year. "Training" because of the primitive design did not fly for a long time and the very next year because of the destruction of the shell was disassembled.

At the same time, work was carried out on the creation of the Krechet airship, which in official history is considered to be the first Russian military airship. The design of "Krechet" is designated in special reference books as semi-rigid, but in reality the truss structure at the bottom of the bearing shell of the airship consisted of only a few frames. The volume of the Krechet carrier casing was impressive - 6000 m3, its length was 70 m, and the maximum diameter was 11,4 m. The airship was equipped with two 63 kW engines, fortified in the rear of a small nacelle, hanging on cables under the carrier casing.

"Merry" flew also very short, no more than two years. Its operation, despite the simplicity of the design, was difficult to achieve - the almost complete absence of a Russian school of airship construction in Russia, fraught with the inevitable shortage of specialists, had an effect.

To organize the systematic training of aeronautical engineers for the Russian military department, which had been trampling all the germs of Russian aeronautic thought for 20 years, had to be forced in the same West - in France. In the same place, as the training ships, the airships of the semi-rigid construction “Berkut”, “Swan” and “Kite” were purchased. The airships “Dove”, “Falcon”, “Hawk”, “Kobchik” and “Mixed” were made by Russian forces in the 1910 — 1911 period. All of them were small - no more than 60 m in length, had a weak power supply and a small, no more than 1000 kg payload. The speed of all these airships did not exceed 50 km / h.

Lack of aeronautics

By the beginning of the Great War, the German Empire had not only advanced in all respects airship industry, but also developed military theory on the use of air battleships. The Germans saw three types of tasks for airships in the coming war - operational and strategic (long-range) reconnaissance, long-term adjustment of artillery fire for operational and tactical purposes, and bombardment.

Germany entered the war, having an impressive fleet airships (mostly of rigid construction) of 18 aircraft, 11 of which had a volume of 18–27 thousand m3, cruising speed of 80–90 km / h, flight altitude of 2500–3000 m, and a range of up to 2 thousand km. The payload of zeppelins was 8–11 tons, all of them were armed with 8–16 machine guns, as well as 2–4 small-caliber guns. For their time, these were aircraft of the highest technological level.

During the war years, especially in the initial period, German airships caused considerable damage to military and industrial facilities of the opponents. Already 14 August 1914, the German zeppelin dropped 11 tons of bombs on the Belgian fortress of Antwerp. As a result, at least 900 houses were damaged, and 60 destroyed. There were numerous human victims. At the same time, the night raids of the zeppelins had a tremendous psychological effect both on the troops and on the civilian population, especially in large cities, creating an ominous atmosphere of horror.

15 August 1914 zeppelin bombed Mlawa (East Prussia) station, occupied by Russian troops. “Early in the morning, the zeppelin started throwing bombs, one of which hit the first class hall of the station, pierced the roof and exploded, and another bomb was thrown onto a railroad track, at a landing site of soldiers from one of the trains,” one of the witnesses said. - At the site of the gap were several corpses. Total 10 bombs were dropped.

The Russian Stavka, considering the front-line experience in the use of zeppelin, also decided to turn a few Russian airships into a means of strategic intelligence, albeit rather clumsily. For example, having an obvious shortage of professional aeronautics personnel, the Russian military department unexpectedly disbanded the only battalion of the Officer Aeronautical School in St. Petersburg, sending its personnel to staff the 12, 13 and 14 of the aeronautical companies. As a result, the training system in this specific area was virtually destroyed, which, of course, the problem of lack of personnel only aggravated.

During the war years, companies with controlled aerostats (that is, with low-volume airships) were deployed in Lutsk, Berdichev, Bialystok, Lida, Brest-Litovsk, Kovno, Grodno and other locations. For their maintenance (gas supply and repair) 14 sheds were built. In comparison with Germany, the Russian aeronautical base looked very modest - already at the beginning of the war the Germans had well-equipped air points throughout the country for servicing airships with 39 sheds (of which 53 were superlarge).

In total, during the Great War, the Russian aeronautic units were armed with 14 controlled balloons. This was only part of the aeronautics that the Russian army was supposed to have under the plan for mobilization deployment. But even of these aircrafts, the absolute majority - 10 airships - were outdated, and technically different designs, which complicated their operation in front-line conditions. They rarely flew, were practically not used for long-distance intelligence.

Relatively new, the 1913 units built in the Russian army were only four airships - Condor, Astra, Burevestnik and Albatross. "Condor" and "Astra" were built in France, had a cubic capacity within 9800 m3 and speed of about 60 km / h. The Burevestnik airship was built in Germany and was a well-developed German Perseval PL-14. It had a small volume in 10 thousand m 3 and a speed of about 70 km / h. The Albatros airship was a similar scheme - a version of the Perceval adapted to construction at Russian plants.

Sunset era airships

"Condor", "Astra", "Petrel" and "Albatross" were used in the initial period of the Great War fairly intensively. Especially successful was the combat work of the Condor and Astra, which were in the possession of the 2 aeronautical company in the city of Brest-Litovsk. Having a powerful radio-telegraph station on board, the Condor was used to promptly inform the Supreme Command Headquarters about the movement of the German-Austrian troops.

22 May 1915 of the Year Astra successfully bombarded the railway hub of the city of Lyk. The bombing was carried out at night from a height of 1200 meters, all in all, an 21 bomb was dropped on the enemy (each weighing 16 kg). Having dropped the deadly cargo, the airship immediately “jumped” to the height of 1600 m. This sharp rise was very opportune, since an intensive anti-aircraft fire began from the side of Lyk. Several projectiles exploded dangerously close to the airship, and after landing, several holes were found in its nose. Taking advantage of the dark and fair wind, the Astra quickly left the bombardment area and returned to the base in 5.30.


Russian airship "Astra". Photo: dolgoprud.org


From the middle of 1915, the combat work of aeronautical companies was greatly complicated by the appearance of fighter aircraft. For nimble fast cars, even the German zeppelin, which possessed considerable firepower, was easy prey - the hydrogen-filled envelope of the airship was easily ignited by incendiary bullets.

Gradually formidable weapons anti-aircraft artillery became against airships. In the daytime, with a flight altitude not exceeding 2000 — 2500 m, there was practically no chance for airships to return safely from a combat mission, especially in the absence of escort fighters.

The first among Russian combat airships at the beginning of 1915, the Condor was killed, probably from the fire of German fighters. At about the same time in March, the Petrel was dismantled. The height of its rise with a combat load did not exceed 1100 meters, which was clearly not enough to successfully escape even from anti-aircraft guns, but from rifle fire. The same fate befell in June 1915, the airship "Astra" - from the set of patched holes the carrier shell finally became useless. Previously, all of his comrades killed the most perfect of them, built at the Izhora plant "Albatross".

This airship was considered the best of all samples of aircrafts created by Russian factories before the beginning of the Great War. It could reach speeds of up to 68 km / h, had powerful engines, an adequate climb ceiling, and most importantly, an aluminized envelope of a carrying balloon that protected the gas from being heated by sunlight and masked the airship well (especially in cloudy weather).

"Albatross" was very unlucky in the fate of the flight. In early September, 1914, he came under the "friendly fire" of the 4 of the Siberian Corps, which had just arrived at the front from Eastern Siberia and was not warned about the possible flight of its airship. The device was successfully landed, and after repairs in Brest-Litovsk it was returned to service. But already on October 13, due to an error in piloting, the Albatross suffered damage incompatible with its further operation.

As a result of the Great Retreat of 1915, the Russian army lost all aeronautical bases and boathouses in Lutsk, Lviv, Brest-Litovsk, in the Kovnenskaya and Grodno fortresses. It was considered inexpedient to create new bases for airships: there was neither a new materiel, nor properly trained specialists to use it competently and expediently. In addition, in 1915, the airships for the Russian army already looked like a kind of weird excess: the army was acutely lacking ammunition, rifles, machine guns, tailing tools and even boots - was it possible to think about airships?

By the middle of 1916, when the Russian army slightly "breathed its breath" in terms of military-technical supply, combat airships were no longer remembered - not only in Russian, but also on the Western European front. The era of high-speed fighters began, and even the mighty German zeppelins gradually shifted from combat missions to execution of courier and diplomatic missions.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 11111mail.ru
    +8
    24 January 2015 07: 37
    Airships will still have their say as flying air platforms.
    1. -1
      24 January 2015 19: 26
      Military - it is very doubtful, they are simply stray from ALL. Even probably a pistol. But civilian platforms - most likely there will be a breakthrough, you can carry mountains of cargo over any distances very cheaply. It's like ships, only cheaper and faster. Moreover, without pilots, they calmly fly on autopilot Glonass and GPS.
      1. 0
        24 January 2015 19: 56
        Airships so far have one future hanging on a leash in the interests of monitoring, broadcasting and relaying. All other niches for them are almost completely closed, their main problem remains and does not disappear - a giant windage and, consequently, dependence on weather conditions, poor controllability, etc. And given the fact that under them you need to fence an expensive infrastructure in a world where they consider almost a penny all prospects are few.
        1. 0
          24 January 2015 21: 26
          Why not use this windage as a plus? Fuel economy.
          1. +1
            24 January 2015 21: 57
            Then you will not fly where you need to, but you will catch streams, despite the fact that the airship is not a sailboat in general, which can change the area of ​​the sails, change their configuration (perform turning), etc.
            And those flows are also variable - they can change speed, direction (gusts) and generally be vortex. In general, it will be necessary to put more heavy engines in order to compensate for them, plus a fuel supply, etc.
            1. -1
              25 January 2015 03: 09
              You can put sails, which, if necessary, will be easily removed and removed, and power can be supplied from solar panels with which you can cover the entire shell of zepellin.
              1. +1
                25 January 2015 21: 31
                Quote: giperion121
                You can put sails, which, if necessary, will be easily removed and removed,

                You certainly want to get a hafel on the back of the head. Do it on a sailing dinghy. At the same time, you will understand where to place this daggerboard on the airship.
                1. 0
                  4 February 2015 12: 37
                  Now even in our time there are projects of sailing ships
                  http://fairtransport.eu/shipbuilding/ecoliner/
                  And it is not necessary to repeat everything on such airships as it was on sailing ships, I think that the layout of the sails will be completely different, so you bent it "to get it on the back of the head" wassat
                  Together with the use of efficient solar panels throughout the shell, the use of sails can significantly reduce the cost of transporting goods, which is very important for Russia.
        2. 0
          25 January 2015 16: 19
          Quote: clidon
          Airships so far have one future hanging on a leash in the interests of monitoring

          Balloons are hanging on a leash!
          1. 0
            25 January 2015 20: 52
            I do not know what an aerostat with an engine will be called for holding on a point. Airship?
  2. itr
    +1
    24 January 2015 07: 54
    They already said their word
    The future is clearly not theirs.
    1. +4
      24 January 2015 08: 51
      airships are inferior in speed but outperform in safety, comfort
      . provide a large volume and load capacity. can hang and work from unequipped platforms. land where necessary, not where there is an airfield. it's like comparing a Ferrari and a bus. Yes, for the Air Force, there is a drill, for example, or a transporter. and certainly they do not need a complex and expensive infrastructure as high-speed rail. the light did not converge on the bombers. Yes, and the requirements of environmentalists do not forget for civilians it is important.
      1. +1
        24 January 2015 17: 26
        Cross out the "security". Airships are fighting for nothing.
        1. Kassandra
          +1
          25 January 2015 12: 18
          airships are safer. if the plane engine fails, then ... and the airship engines can be repaired right in flight.
          1. 0
            25 January 2015 21: 21
            The Germans fired 4 NT series airships - they lost one. How many "repairable" flying cigars were beaten in the good old days and I don't want to remember.
            1. Kassandra
              0
              26 January 2015 16: 38
              more planes crowded ... both in absolute and percentage terms.

              Are there many crashes of advertising airships or mongrel balloons for the entertainment of the public?
  3. +5
    24 January 2015 08: 48
    Airships are good airships. And the operation of this will cost several times less than any flying aircraft carrier, because. consumption will go only to ship systems, and not to huge engines.

    And the result of a missile hit by a flying aircraft carrier and zeppelin is the same. A huge pile of scrap metal. However, missile defense systems and the airship and flying aircraft carrier have the same chance of repelling a missile.
    1. Lefteropoulos
      0
      25 January 2015 21: 41
      In Russia, there is a developed project of a highly efficient hybrid airship-helicopter on an air cushion for Siberia and the Far North (the airship-airship "BARS" is a non-aerodrome airship). Magazine "Marine Fleet" 4-5 years ago published materials about it with drawings and photographs of a working prototype. The problem of implementation, as always, is a mafia-bureaucratic one. Lobbyists are ruining competitive projects.
  4. +2
    24 January 2015 10: 30
    Airships can be used as platforms for AWACS and air defense very successfully. Yes, and transporters probably will be economical of them.
  5. +3
    24 January 2015 10: 46
    The airship is very good for tourists, a great innovative way to make money.
    But I think it is of little use for military affairs, it was found out already in 1MB. As a freight vehicle, it is controversial, because requires developed ground infrastructure: boathouses for maintenance and storage.
    Airships are very vulnerable to bad weather: icing, sudden squalls in history often led to accidents and disasters. The speed of even modern airships does not exceed hundreds with a small mph. The cost of an airship made of modern materials is comparable to the cost of a cargo plane or helicopter.
    Although I remember old projects where it was proposed to use the airship as a powerful crane, this is probably interesting.
    1. +3
      24 January 2015 11: 30
      but the cost of transportation is 25 times lower than that of a helicopter. requires boathouse? but it does not require a multi-kilometer runway. You underestimated the speed of one and a half to two times. on the Moscow-Vladivostok flight for about a day. airplanes and ships depend on the weather and icing, but they don’t refuse them? Icing can be fought. in extreme cases, any field is enough for planting. sharp squalls led to disasters and aircraft, and even in some cases railway trains. Compare the cabin on the ship (for comparison) and the seat on the plane, the difference is obvious. for the Air Force, it is quite suitable in a number of cases. and in some ways jet patrols, AWACS, etc. are bypassed.
      1. +2
        24 January 2015 13: 51
        Quote: kashtak
        speed you underestimated one and a half to two times
        um ... a little more than one and a half)) If for a passenger plane the norm is 900 km / h, then for the airship the same 100 km / h is a very outstanding result.
        In addition, it is necessary to constantly replenish the carrier gas, it (helium) diffuses through any barrier. These are expenses, and considerable - for the extraction of one cubic meter of helium, the energy equivalent of one and a half thousand cubic meters of natural gas is needed.
        An airship needs a boathouse (as a closed parking lot) or an airship (as an open). The latter is a circular platform with a diameter equal to two lengths of the airship itself, with a mooring mast in the center. The construction is not weak.
        The airship needs to be ballasted ... well, that’s clear enough. The devil, as always, is in the details - if non-freezing liquid is used as ballast, then the infrastructure will be golden. And if gas is poisoned, then in general, diamond
        1. +1
          24 January 2015 14: 47
          for an airship, speeds of 150-200km \ h are quite achievable. compared with 100 just one and a half two. it is not necessary to ballast the airship; a scheme with aerostatic unloading has long been invented. gas compensates for 80 percent of the flight weight, while at the same time it reduces the volume. the rest of the rotors like a helicopter for example and still have a compressor. the gas in the tank and the same gas in the receiver are different things. so the mast is not needed. an airship is necessary but only as a base, the structure is not weak, but the airfield will be stronger. the airship can work from site to site. Unfortunately, gas leaks cannot be ruled out, but it is not necessary to exaggerate it. so that the cost is obtained between water and rail transport and there are no diamonds there, the devil sits in a completely different place
          1. +1
            24 January 2015 18: 55
            Yes, you are right, things like that - aerostatic unloading, a compressor and gas in a cylinder (there is such a word "compression", rotors "like a helicopter"))) - all this takes place, even was done. Not a particularly successful design by the American engineer Pyasetski as an example, if interested.
            About "the mast is not needed" amused) But what about the surface wind, from which you can not escape? After all, the lateral projection of the airship surface is not at all small. So the high-speed wind pressure of 7-8 m / s is capable of fraying a sufficiently strong shell to shreds. It is because of the safety of the structure that the airship revolves around the mast in the parking lot).
            Balloons with unloading (or with zero buoyancy, as they are also called) at one time aroused a certain interest. Again, there is a "but" - the design of the balloon, its power circuit in this case should be very strong (due to vibrations that accompany the operation of any gearbox and motor) and light (otherwise it is simply unprofitable). And this implies the use of composites, which again turns it into a very expensive pleasure.
            I assure you that if it were really very simple and profitable, then back in the Union the whole north of the country, Siberia and the Far East would be covered by a network of airshipledromes.
            1. Kassandra
              +2
              25 January 2015 13: 50
              and it’s really simple and profitable, stop that is why all this is not in order to slow down the development of Russia ...

              absolutely all technical problems were resolved in the German LZ-127, which was hired by the USSR government for mapping and geological exploration of the North.
              Zeppelins had regular flights around the world.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +1
          24 January 2015 21: 31
          And you need to use not expensive helium, but cheap hydrogen. With additives that do not allow it to ignite.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  6. +2
    24 January 2015 13: 33
    With all the minuses of the airships, and these are problems with helium leaks, they cannot solve it in any way, or maybe it is impossible. the problem with height control, then bleed off the gas for landing or during fuel production, then throw off or load the ballast. True, I read when they want to use powerful compressors to control the height, that is, you need to go down; you pump gas into high-pressure cylinders; you need to go up you release gas into the shell. If this is done, then the cost of transportation will be the lowest of all types of air transport. And maybe even some types of land transport.
  7. +1
    24 January 2015 14: 12
    It seems that in one of the books of Kalashnikov or Mukhin there was a whole chapter about a thermal airship of rigid construction with a nuclear power plant. Can anyone give a name? Or a link to a similar description on the net?
    The topic is interesting for AWACS, the CPSU, and platforms for the arsenal of long-range BB missiles.
    1. 0
      24 January 2015 14: 59
      re-read "KEC star" there are many non-naive ideas
    2. The comment was deleted.
  8. 0
    24 January 2015 15: 28
    quite interesting. story
  9. 0
    24 January 2015 17: 32
    Airships will find their niche. But not in passenger traffic. It was a dead-end road, and the death of the Hindenburg put an end to passenger airships.
  10. +1
    24 January 2015 18: 00
    Imagine, if the "Hindenburg" had not exploded at the right time, in the right place, history would certainly have gone the other way. And the path would be very unfavorable for the USA (This is my opinion).
    1. 0
      24 January 2015 19: 12
      Why so? Let me remind you that the largest airships in the world - "Akron", "Macon" and "Los Angeles" belonged to the United States. Some were built independently, some received reparations from the Germans. And almost all of them ended up with a disaster. Not explosions, of course, but there were collisions with the ground, destruction of the structure during the flight.
      Even if (hypothetically) aviation would lose to balloons, then it was the States that were in a huge plus. Reasons: industrial and infrastructure developed by then (just a network of sites in Lakehurst is worth what), established cooperation with Zeppelin and Schütte-Lanz firms, huge helium reserves. Well, the geographical position of the United States itself as an island between two oceans.
      1. 0
        25 January 2015 01: 04
        Do you now understand what you wrote? What reparations? What disasters? When did hydrogen begin to replace helium?

        Dear Jon Quiet, be in the subject ...
        1. 0
          25 January 2015 16: 36
          Quote: kirpich
          You now understand what you wrote

          Imagine just in the subject and understand perfectly what I'm writing about. At least as a designer, who at one time worked at the DKBA.
          The United States, I will tell you a secret, participated in the First World War and, as a result, received the right to reparations from the defeated side. In the form of technologies chosen at its discretion. These firms include Krupp and Zeppelin.
          The Americans paid close attention to the possibility of airships. And the work on this program was the result of a well-thought out and carefully developed plan, supported by the state.
          Regarding the replacement of hydrogen with helium. Work in this direction began before the explosion of the "Hindenburg". Do you think the Germans were fools and did not know about the properties of a mixture of hydrogen with oxygen? But why, in the same Hindenburg, were all metal objects - from dishes to pianos - made of aluminum or brass? And in order to exclude the appearance of a spark, even if it is accidental. But the American ZRS-4 "Akron" and ZRS-5 "Macon" used helium as a working medium. And this is 1929!
          As for the disaster ... I quote: “The loss of the Akron, with its crew of brave fighters and officers, is a national disaster. I mourn with the nation, and especially the wives and families of lost men. New airships can be built, but the nation cannot afford to lose people like Rear Admiral William A. Moffett and his comrades, who died with him, maintaining the best traditions of the United States Navy. " These are the words of F.D. Roosevelt in memory of the Akron disaster, which killed 72 crew members. And here it is still considered the most ambitious.
          The explosion of the Hindenburg struck contemporaries not at all because of the explosion as such. Before that, there were terrible events in Oppau, abeam Halifax - the average man does not remember about them or does not know at all. "Hindenburg" was the first man-made disaster captured on a movie camera, that's the thing. And these shots then scattered all over the planet, creating a natural fear of gas balloons.
      2. Kassandra
        0
        25 January 2015 14: 03
        "independently" is the American branch of the same German company ... laughing well, just like NASA then
        the airships operated by German crews did not suffer disasters.
  11. +2
    24 January 2015 21: 34
    "Hindenburg" used hydrogen was flammable and suffered from malicious intent.
    In general, airships fly at low altitudes and, unlike airplanes, are more dependent on bad weather. Aircraft fly as a rule at altitudes of about 10 km and depend on the weather mainly during landing. Many functions of airships for reconnaissance and surveillance are now effectively performed by small drones. It turns out economically and imperceptibly.
  12. 0
    25 January 2015 04: 57
    Our nonsense was not involved, and the first in history created a compound of bombers (well-known Ilya Muromets), which were an order of magnitude superior in efficiency to Zeppelins.
    1. Kassandra
      +1
      25 January 2015 14: 12
      it's not bullshit dear. especially if for reconnaissance and PLO purposes

      from the Atlantic convoys covered by "blimps" in WW2 not a single transport was drowned. The SPs simply did not risk approaching them.
      before that, the Germans in WW1 also melted most of the Russian submarines in the Baltic with airships.
  13. 0
    25 January 2015 13: 55
    Dear Yon Tikhy, you can minus until you lose your pulse, but you are wrong. Airships came to naught because they used hydrogen. When they began to extract helium on an industrial scale, the era of airships was fucked up. And this happened because of the Hindenburg disaster.
    1. 0
      25 January 2015 14: 44
      "The airships came to naught because they used hydrogen," sorry I do not agree, the airships came to naught because they could not be bombers, especially fighters. hydrogen and disasters are just an excuse.
      1. 0
        25 January 2015 15: 30
        Yeah, a huge carcass filled with hydrogen flies and carries a huge ammunition ... To shoot it down, one cartridge (tracer, incendiary) is enough ...
        1. Kassandra
          0
          26 January 2015 15: 42
          American semi-rigid ones flew with helium until the mid-70s, until the miniaturization of electronics replaced the E-3 Sentry in the AWACS role, small soft anti-submarine aircraft stopped flying a little earlier.
          With the complication of relations after the "Hindenburg" with Nazi Germany, American rigid airships simply had no one to maintain ... it was filled with hydrogen simply because helium as a strategic material was not supplied anywhere, even for civilian needs. and it exploded from an incendiary bomb set by an anti-fascist from among the members of his crew, who either incorrectly or if not set the detonator in time. before the discovery of African deposits, helium used to be in industrial quantities only in America.
        2. Kassandra
          0
          26 January 2015 16: 43
          one cartridge will not be enough. British air defense was able to withstand the attacks of the Kaiser airships in the WWI only with the installation of NURS units on their biplanes, after which they began to climb to a height where the planes did not know how to fly then, but because of this their own bomb load was greatly reduced, and therefore quite at the end of the war they were already used more as scouts over the sea, to control the movement of the British Navy. due to which half the surface fleet of Germany was able to withstand the English (and French).
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      25 January 2015 17: 06
      Why minus? I'm not fond of this. I do not see any point in the minuses, because in my opinion they have no convincing force, and even educational and even more so.
      But about the reasons why the airships left the stage, I can debate.
      The first - the tasks for which they were conceived and created, began to be solved by other means and at lower cost. I mean aviation.
      Second: if we analyze the reasons why the airships of that time suffered accidents, then in the first place will be the destruction of the structure due to unacceptable aerodynamic loads. Simply put, the device landed in a storm. If he had communication facilities and competent weather reports a day ahead, this would not have happened.
      Third, the type of gas and its price, of course, are of significant importance. The American airships had helium equipment (the mining technology was, of course, wretched, but they could afford it).
      And the fourth ... if the airships came to naught due to the use of hydrogen, then how to explain the photos of the besieged Leningrad with hydrogen gas tanks on its streets? It seems like it’s dangerous, but go ahead, use it for some reason ...
      1. 0
        25 January 2015 19: 46
        Quote: Jon_ Quiet
        It seems like it’s dangerous, but go ahead, use it for some reason ...

        So after the war, what kind of security is there ...
      2. 0
        25 January 2015 19: 59
        Quote: Jon_ Quiet
        The American airships had helium equipment (the mining technology was, of course, wretched, but they could afford it).

        In the 30s of the last century, the United States possessed the largest reserves of helium. In 1925, the Helium Act was passed in the United States. For a long time, helium was considered a strategic product, as a result of which it was pumped into a gas storage in Cliffside. World helium reserves amount to about 41 billion cubic meters. The main reserves are concentrated in Qatar, Algeria, the USA and Russia. About 175 million cubic meters of helium per year are produced in the world. The largest manufacturers of this product are the USA. In Russia, so far only about 5 million cubic meters of helium are produced per year. This is due to the fact that the main reserves of this substance are concentrated in deposits in Eastern Siberia and the Far East, which are still poorly developed. Meanwhile, the helium content in these deposits is very high - 0,2–0,8%.
  14. Aspirin
    +1
    25 January 2015 14: 39
    Few people know but the airships were actively used in the Second World War. And now they will find a place.
    It is only necessary to use their strengths. Every vegetable has its own garden. Now it’s even easier than at the beginning of the twentieth century, since many of the shortcomings of the airships of that time did not exist at the modern technological level. Such as, for example, loss of carrier gas or explosive hydrogen.
    1. 0
      25 January 2015 15: 23
      Well, why, the film "Die Hard" with Vitaly Solomin and Ekaterina Rumyantseva clearly showed how airships (balloons) were used in the defense of Moscow. They were raised to a height of up to 5000 meters, if I'm not mistaken.
      1. +2
        25 January 2015 17: 31
        Quote: kirpich
        airships (balloons) were used

        Airships and balloons are two different things! A balloon is a balloon filled with hot air or gas lighter than air, in free flight, or tied with a cable. An airship is an aircraft equipped with engines capable of maneuvering and moving in the right direction.
        1. 0
          25 January 2015 18: 08
          Quote: Bayonet
          Airship - an aircraft equipped with engines, capable of maneuvering and moving in the right direction
          exactly! No wonder the words "airship" and "conductor" are consonant - the root is common. From French "diriger" means "to manage"
    2. +1
      25 January 2015 16: 36
      Quote: Aspirin
      Few people know but the airships were actively used in the Second World War.

      Four airships took part in supporting the fighting of the Red Army - "USSR V-1", "USSR V-12", "Malysh" and "Pobeda". In 1943-44. the USSR V-12 airship flew 969 flights with a total duration of 1284 hours. In 1945 the airships "USSR V-12" and "Pobeda" performed 216 flights with a total duration of 382 hours. The airships carried 194580 cubic meters of hydrogen and 319190 kilograms of various cargo. In total, during the Second World War, Soviet airships performed more than 1500 flights.
    3. 0
      25 January 2015 16: 42
      Quote: Aspirin
      Few people know but the airships were actively used in the Second World War.

      While the Second World War had already flared up in Europe, the American fleet was armed with the K-2 airship, the old army TS-14, the old G-1 from the Goodyear advertising flotilla, the old all-metal ZMC-2 Metallalklad and finally, the prototype of the civil L-1. These were small airships with good aerodynamics, small keels hidden under the skin of the lower part of the shell and with a crew gondola attached directly to the shell. . By December 7, 1941, when Japanese planes attacked the American naval base Pearl Harbor, the U.S. fleet had 4 airships of type K, 3 - of type L, 2 - of type TC and 1 - of type G. To be able to cover with their help The West Coast, where the Japanese fleet began to operate in December 1941 and February 1942, 7 Goodyear advertising airships, designated from G-2 to G-8, were involved in the protection. To. In 1942, the company "Goodyear" developed a project of the type M airship, the first representative of which, the M-1 took off in October 1943. Back in 1943, 22 airships were ordered, but in 1944, after the construction of the M-4, the order was canceled. Patrol aircraft flying boats and advanced anti-submarine equipment made it easier to spot Nazi submarines, and airships were considered ineffective. The airships M-2, -3 and -4 during the war gradually received new enlarged shells. The main crew consisted of 10 people, but usually there were 16 people on board the airship. In March 1945, the separation of the light Piper LN-1 aircraft in flight from the gondola of the M-4 airship was tested over Lakehurst. This was the last attempt of its kind in aviation history.
  15. 0
    25 January 2015 16: 33
    A small Swiss firm, Prospective Concepts AG, has been working for the German industrial giant Festa for more than 5 years on new technologies for the use of pneumatics in industry. One of its latest developments was a hybrid of the aircraft with the Stingray airship. The aircraft is a flying wing aircraft. Moreover, this wing is filled with light gas and provides a quarter of the payload due to the aerostatic lift. As a result, the Stingray takes off and lands with a slight take-off and mileage. And in the future, when using a pneumatic catapult, it will start practically from a place.
  16. 0
    25 January 2015 17: 09
    In pursuit ... The PQ convoys were guarded by airships (balloons). As soon as they were abandoned, the rout of the convoys began immediately. How's V. Pikul - "Don't do this Dudley"
  17. Tribuns
    +1
    25 January 2015 17: 55
    It's amazing how Russia is rich in ideas and nuggets: many ideas, the same airship, radio, television ... were proposed by the Russians. And although we have ideas earlier than in other countries, in the same Western Europe and the USA, but with their implementation we have complete "seams" ... Until the West does, we will not remember our own ... Difficulties with the introduction of inventions accompanied both Soviet engineers and current Russian ...
    Perhaps this is because we are rich in natural resources, territory, and earlier the population ... And, the West with less resources picked up any idea to improve its well-being ...
    1. +2
      25 January 2015 19: 09
      Nooo .... just a bureaucrat sitting in a chair says to the inventor - we will promote your invention if I will be a co-author. In 99% of cases, the inventors answer evasively .... The result is most of our inventions in the West.
      1. Kassandra
        0
        26 January 2015 16: 34
        do you think they’re all not on purpose? ... maybe it can be, for example, that someone from the west (or from the east) is rolling back to them for such actions here?
  18. 0
    26 January 2015 13: 45
    If it were not for the Americans who banned the sale of helium to Germany, who knows ... Zeppelins flights across the Atlantic were almost regular (only to Brazil more than 130 times), ship comfort and decent speed. The death of Hindenburg put an end to it, alas, hydrogen and the airship are not compatible. But maybe this technology is still ahead ...
  19. 0
    27 January 2015 16: 06
    These "leviathans" of the air, the size of aircraft carriers, look powerful! I can imagine how they frightened people on earth at the beginning of the last century fellow