“Comanche”, which did not reach

56
The idea of ​​creating a promising helicopter appeared in the minds of Pentagon representatives in the early 1980s. At that time, the Cold War, after some detente of the 70s, was able to find a second wind. In this case, the likely opponents were identified: the Soviet Union and its closest allies. In those years, the Warsaw Pact countries had an overwhelming superiority in the quantitative and qualitative composition of armored vehicles over NATO states. Naturally, it was profitable for the US military to get an effective tool to combat armored vehicles, primarily with tanks. At the same time, one of the most effective means of fighting tanks was seen as an attack helicopter armed with anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs).

In December 1982, a report was prepared, entitled "Research in the field of application aviation US Army ”, this report proved the inability of the obsolete Bell OH-58 and Bell AN-1 helicopters to solve combat tasks in the face of counteracting the air defense of the Warsaw Pact states. The following year, the US Department of Defense announced the start of work on a new light multi-purpose helicopter under the Light Helicopter Experimental - LHX program. The new combat vehicle was planned to be developed in two versions - multipurpose (UTIL) and reconnaissance-strike (SCAT).

The technical assignment issued by the US military contained a number of complex and difficult tasks at that time. The helicopter was to successfully perform combat missions in all climatic zones, day and night, in flat and highlands. The key point was the requirements that related to the maximum airspeed, which at 180 km / h exceeded the speed of any helicopter in service. The machine, created in the framework of the project LHX, was supposed to reach speeds of about 500 km / h. The second very important task was to reduce the visibility of the helicopter in the radar, infrared and acoustic ranges.



The creation of a rotary-wing machine under the LHX program was to be held on a competitive basis. From the standpoint of today’s days, the appetites of the American generals can be astounding. In the interests of the army alone, it was intended to order almost 5 thousands of helicopters: 1100 in the SCAT version to replace the AH-1 “Cobra” attack helicopters, 1800 to replace the OH-6 “Hughes” and OH-58 “Kiowa” and 2000 machines in the UTIL variant Replace multipurpose UH-1 "Huey". In addition, orders for the helicopter could follow from the Marine Corps and the Air Force, and the total amount of the order to make 6 thousands of machines. The total cost of developing helicopters was estimated at 2,8 billion dollars, and the cost of their production would be 36 billion dollars, which would automatically make the LHX program the most ambitious of all existing helicopter programs.

A firm that would have secured victory in this competition would have received orders, and therefore profit for the next 20-25 years. The fairly tough competition for the right to create a new attack helicopter was entered by 4 of large US aircraft building companies - the Boeing-Vertol, Sikorsky, Bell and Hughes firms. At the same time, the projects that were presented by these companies were very different from each other. So the company "Sikorsky" offered a coaxial helicopter with an additional pusher propeller installed in the annular fairing. It was assumed that such a project is the most technically advanced, but it also has a high degree of risk, in particular, due to the use of a coaxial scheme, which is almost never used in the West.

The Bell company, which had extensive experience in creating aircraft with turning screws, promoted a project created on the basis of an experimental convertoplane XV-15. Hughes offered a light winged helicopter based on a single-rotor scheme without a tail rotor. In this project, a jet of jet gases from the engine was used to balance the reactive moment of the rotor and create additional thrust in the longitudinal direction. A similar project, but with a tail rotor in the annular channel, was demonstrated by Boeing Vertol. In this case, a common place in all projects was only the placement of weapons on the internal suspension.



In 1984-1987 in the United States, an assessment of the submitted projects was conducted. Its outcome was a revision of key requirements. This mainly concerned flight speed. Special studies have shown that at altitudes around 15 meters and speeds of more than 320-350 km / h, the crew will find it extremely difficult to simultaneously drive and perform the tactical tasks they face. Especially if it happens in bad weather or at night. It was completely impossible to fight by helicopter developing the speed of 500 km / h. This conclusion allowed to abandon the most exotic projects, the embodiment of which was associated with a significant proportion of risk. At the same time, due to reduced funding, it was decided to abandon the creation of a multi-purpose version of the UTIL helicopter. For the helicopter, only reconnaissance and percussion functions were left, and the total number of supposed machines was reduced to 2096 units.

Despite the reduction of solved tasks, further work within the framework of the LHX project still required unforeseen large expenses. Financial and technical problems led to the fact that the contestants were combined into two groups: Bell-McDonnell-Douglas "(the latter swallowed the company" Hughes ") and" Boeing-Sikorsky. " Companies presented their projects in 1990 year. But at that time, the Soviet Union essentially surrendered its positions, and the probability of a big war in Europe was significantly reduced. Against this background, a possible order was once again provided, which was reduced to 1292 helicopters.

In January, 1991, it was announced that the competition won the Boeing-Sikorsky tandem. At the same time, the nameless car until then was officially named the RAH-66 “Comanche”. By tradition, American helicopters are named after the tribes of North American Indians - "Apache", "Chinook", "Kiowa" - still "air cavalry". The designation RAH (reconnaisence and attack helicopter) was given to the American helicopter for the first time in stories. In the American army, attack helicopters designated AN (attack helicopter), and light vehicles intended for observation and reconnaissance of HE (observation helicopter). At the same time, the new helicopter was not inferior in its capabilities to strike machines and was the first truly reconnaissance helicopter in the American army, therefore the presence of the letter R in its name is not accidental.



The Boeing-Sikorsky Association received a contract for the development and construction of two RAH-66 Comanche helicopters. It was about demo copies. At the same time, all the most complex and “critical” technologies were tried to be tested on flying laboratories or stands. The glider of the helicopter was made entirely of composite materials. To test it, the Sikorsky S-75 helicopter was built and tested, on which the glider shape change was also checked by the EPR value - the effective scattering surface. Apparently, the helicopter S-75 was the first in the world, made using the elements of technology "stealth".

The main elements of the fuselage of the new RAH-66 Comanche helicopter were box girders made from composite materials. Inside this beam was located central fuel tank with a capacity of 1142 liters. From the outside, all the main helicopter units were installed on the beam, which were covered with special large-size panels that formed the outer contour of the machine. The shell of the helicopter was unloaded and with the appearance of combat damage - holes from 23-mm projectiles and 12,7-mm bullets, the loss of its strength did not occur. There was no armor per se on the helicopter, only the pilot’s seats had light protection. The cockpit floor consisted of safely damaged panels that were supposed to absorb the impact energy during a possible accident. For access to various components and systems when performing maintenance about 40% of the fuselage surface were made in the form of removable panels. Due to the features of the installed chassis, the helicopter could “squat” on it in order to reduce the height when transported by air.

The layout of the helicopter was traditional, but had a bright highlight. She was to accommodate the crew, which was different from other helicopters. The pilot was in the front seat, and the weapon operator was in the back. As a result, the pilot had an excellent overview, which was especially important when flying near the ground, as well as during air combat. At the same time, the weapons operator retained all his capabilities in finding targets. This was achieved through the implementation of the “eye outside the cabin” concept. Thermal imaging and infrared viewing systems of the front hemisphere related to the second generation of such devices were installed on the Comanche. They made it possible to see on 40% further and to produce a sharper image in 2 times than similar systems on Apache attack helicopters.



Especially for the new helicopter guided missiles were not created. The available weapons bays were suitable for the existing Stinger air-to-air missiles and the Hellfire ATGM. On the inner surface of the casement compartments, 6 armament suspension units were installed (3 on each leaflet), on any of them it was possible to install an 2 SD "Stinger", one ATGM "Hellfire" or a container with NAR. In addition, the helicopter was equipped with a triple-barreled 20-mm cannon, ammunition which ranged from 320 to 500 shells. The gun had a variable rate of fire. When firing at aerial targets, it was 1500 rds / min, while firing at ground targets - 750 rds / min. In the case of the use of a strike helicopter under the conditions of a relatively weak enemy air defense, the armament could be significantly enhanced by the use of additional suspension units mounted on small attachable wings. These wings could be delivered in the field in just 15 minutes. In this configuration, the helicopter was able to carry up to 14 ATGM "Hellfire", only 2 missiles less than the "Apache". True, the maximum flight speed in this mode was reduced by 20 km / h due to the increase in the drag of the vehicle.

Special attention was paid to reducing the radar visibility of the helicopter. The achievement of this goal was promoted by a convex fuselage shape with flat surfaces, the use of a rotor hub spatula, a retractable landing gear, a radio absorbing coating for the blades and the fuselage, and even a cannon cleared into a special fairing. All these activities significantly reduced the visibility of the car.

In order to reduce the visibility of the helicopter, the Americans achieved a real triumph. The EPR value of the RAH-66 Comanche was 1 / 600 from the EPR of the Apache helicopter and 1 / 200 from the EPR of the Kiowa helicopter. This allowed the helicopter to go unnoticed for longer by the enemy radar. The noise of the main rotor was also significantly reduced - 2 times as compared to Apache, which allowed the helicopter to sneak up on enemy positions by 40% closer. Another success was the reduction of thermal radiation of the power plant to 25% from the usual level. For the first time, the Comanche system was used to suppress infrared radiation (previously, various nozzles for engine nozzles were used to reduce infrared radiation), in which hot exhaust gases of engines were mixed with ambient air and then thrown down through two special flat slits that ran along the ledge along the entire length of the tail boom of the machine. Thanks to these solutions for the air defense radar, as well as missiles equipped with radar and infrared guidance heads, the RAH-66 Comanche helicopter was a difficult target.



Of course, the tests carried out revealed a number of serious problems with the machine, primarily with electronics. It also turned out that the weight of an empty helicopter is significantly greater than the calculated one. Because of this, all the flight characteristics of the helicopter, in particular its rate of climb, were lower than originally stated. In fairness it should be noted that the manufacturer eliminated all the flaws in a fairly fast pace. The 6 first RAH-66 Comanche helicopter gunships were to go into service in the 2002 year, and by 2010, the number of helicopters in the front-line units should have been 72 machines. However, even such a significant reduction in the order did not help. 23 February 2004, the US Congress decided to close the program. By this time, the development has already managed to eat more than 7 billion dollars. Thus, the program to create a Comanche helicopter was thwarted, becoming one of the most expensive programs with such an unenviable fate.

It is believed that such a difficult decision was made on the basis of a detailed analysis of modern military operations, the use of helicopters and their losses in Afghanistan, Iraq and Chechnya. In all these conflicts, most of the rotary-winged machines were shot down with the help of MANPADS equipped with a combined guidance system (including a thermal imaging channel), small-caliber anti-aircraft artillery, or even completely weapons. Against these short-range weapons, no stealth technology used on the RAH-66 Comanche and costing huge sums of money helped. In addition, the helicopter was not armor. Based on this, many American generals decided that RAH-66 is not suitable for use in the conditions of those military conflicts that are widespread in the modern world. With the passing into the past of the global confrontation in Europe, the conditions for which this helicopter was created have disappeared.

Flight specifications of the RAH-66 Comanche:

Overall specifications: length - 14,28 m, fuselage length (without gun) - 12,9 m, maximum fuselage width - 2,04 m, height to the main rotor - 3,37 m, main rotor diameter - 12,9 m, fenestron diameter - 1,37 m.
The area swept by the rotor - 116,74 м2.
Normal take-off weight - 5601 kg, empty weight - 4218 kg, maximum take-off weight - 7896 kg.
Fuel tank capacity - 1142 l (only internal).
The power plant - the turboshaft LHTEC T800-LHT-801 with the power 2x1563 hp
Maximum speed - 324 km / h.
Cruising speed - 306 km / h.
Combat radius - 278 km.
Crew - 2 man (pilot and weapon operator).
The armament is a triple-barreled 20-mm cannon (500 shells), the inner compartment is up to the 6 ATGM Hellfire or 12 SAM-Stinger. External Suspension - up to 8 ATGM Hellfire, up to 16 SAM Stinger, 56x70-mm HAP Hydra 70 or 1730 l in PTB.



Information sources:
http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201412160931-qmbf.htm
http://www.dogswar.ru/oryjeinaia-ekzotika/aviaciia/4571-boevoi-vertolet-rah-.html
http://www.airwar.ru/enc/ah/rah66.html
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 52
    +7
    21 January 2015 07: 06
    But grandmas are sawn! In general, a fairly successful solution to a number of attack helicopter problems, albeit to the detriment of survivability from the primitive rifle.
    1. +9
      21 January 2015 07: 52
      Well, they were sawn, not sawn, and some decisions will probably be embodied in future helicopters, and they will save a little of our money, it’s cheaper to learn from other people's mistakes.
      1. Alf
        -1
        21 January 2015 23: 09
        Quote: Wellych
        , and some decisions may be embodied in future helicopters,

        Our answer to Chamberlain.
        KA-58 Black ghost.
        1. +2
          22 January 2015 16: 09
          Quote: Alf

          Our answer to Chamberlain.
          KA-58 Black ghost.

          why not immediately the Star Destroyer?
          Fiction is the same. The same.
          1. Alf
            +1
            22 January 2015 22: 44
            Quote: psiho117
            why not immediately the Star Destroyer?
            Fiction is the same. The same.

            I have one on a shelf with the MIG-37, F-19, Soviet multi-purpose helicopter.
            I look at them and from the flight of thought, the ITALERI modellers are sobering.
        2. Oblozelo
          0
          23 January 2015 21: 47
          I liked the idea, just add traction, better reactive, dvigun aft, to compensate for the recoil of the twin gun
    2. +9
      21 January 2015 11: 29
      Quote: 52gim
      But grandmas are sawn! In general, a fairly successful solution to a number of attack helicopter problems, albeit to the detriment of survivability from the primitive rifle.
      Reply Quote Report Abuse

      About grandmothers sawn in such cases, shouting and diots. For one simple reason - this is a bunch of developments that later embodied in other machines. The Americans found the strength to abandon the unnecessary car. Instead of one, we began to produce two
      1. +4
        21 January 2015 14: 03
        Quote: Pimply
        which later embodied in other machines.

        laughing

        In what?
    3. +5
      21 January 2015 11: 34
      I was pleased with the conclusion that the maximum speed was unnecessary at 500 km / h, and at the same time alteration of the helicopter for more urgent tasks .. Apparently, in connection with the development of MANPADS, the turntables will have to be very tight .. And accordingly, when the infantry is saturated with MANPADS (and this all happens in large quantities) the turntables will not have a niche of use, if only with URami they can shoot at targets from 8-10 km in, everything that gets closer will be closer, and the cost of MANPADS and a helicopter is incomparable, and the difference is much higher than between ATGM and tank ..
      1. +2
        21 January 2015 14: 29
        And what is the basis for the pleased conclusion that speed unnecessary? Is it really considered a drawback to be able to independently and as quickly as possible arrive at the appointed place and perform all tasks in accordance with the helicopter’s maneuverability. After all, one should complement the other, and not interfere.
  2. +4
    21 January 2015 07: 36
    cute dragonfly anyway.
    maybe not as a shock, but as a reconnaissance was worth saving.
    1. +7
      21 January 2015 08: 00
      Quote: Bigfoot_Sev
      cute dragonfly anyway.
      maybe not as a shock, but as a reconnaissance was worth saving.

      Yes, of course ... is it an UAV in a century?
      1. 0
        21 January 2015 10: 19
        Well, the UAV has not yet been so perfected.
        practice shows that a drone can be stolen.
        and here we must first pick out the pilots. after picking out the helicopter will become unsuitable for use as a can of stew. = ^ _ ^ =
        1. 0
          21 January 2015 11: 25
          Quote: Bigfoot_Sev
          practice shows that a drone can be stolen.

          Practice shows that no one has stolen drones yet. Here are the different bikes.
        2. +3
          21 January 2015 11: 31
          Quote: Bigfoot_Sev
          practice shows that a drone can be stolen.

          Hijack - no, if you're talking about the Iranian case. Intercept information from the channel - yes, it happened, as well as an independent equipment failure
    2. +1
      21 January 2015 11: 30
      Quote: Bigfoot_Sev
      maybe not as a shock, but as a reconnaissance was worth saving.

      All its intelligence functions with much greater success blocked UAV
      1. +1
        21 January 2015 12: 57
        that is, the UAV control channels are not suppressed?
        I honestly did not sit at the levers of a helicopter or an uav. but a helicopter with live pilots "here and now" seems to me more real than a drone controlled for 500 km.
        1. +3
          21 January 2015 16: 12
          Quote: Bigfoot_Sev
          than a drone controlled for 500km.

          Progress is moving towards independent UAVs. There should be no control channels. Well, perhaps, the reception of a new task in the agreed short period of time.
          1. +1
            21 January 2015 16: 59
            The task is currently in the realm of fantasy and is unlikely to go beyond the scope of game bots in the near future.
          2. +1
            21 January 2015 17: 01
            Quote: Petrix
            There should be no control channels.

            ?
            And why are they needed, these unguided UAVs?
            1. 0
              22 January 2015 09: 05
              Quote: Spade
              And why are they needed, these unguided UAVs?

              Replace a person. First, only colonels will remain, then generals, then only the commander in chief, well, and then ....
          3. +1
            23 January 2015 12: 49
            On a binary analysis platform, this is not possible. Why? Because it is impossible to analyze a complex of differently dynamic interconnectedness of changing events with a linear system of building codes. And that means making adequate decisions.
    3. +2
      21 January 2015 16: 16
      Quote: Bigfoot_Sev
      cute dragonfly anyway.
      maybe not as a shock, but as a reconnaissance was worth saving.

      In the meantime, he starred in the film "Target Number One" and the movie is a cut above Russian patriotic-stilted crafts. "Afghan Breakdown" and "9th Company" are like films about the same war, but how different they are in the truth of life and artistic value. Sorry, if not in the subject, I'm tired of just losing the "battle for the minds"
  3. EvacuatorBobGrey666
    -2
    21 January 2015 08: 27
    ours also wanted something like that: "black ghost", even a combined model from the "star", it seems, was)
    1. +2
      21 January 2015 09: 26
      yes, there were some rumors, since the 90s, it seems that the Ka-50 "Black Shark" will be developed, but so far nothing but the "Alligator" will be seen.
    2. +4
      21 January 2015 10: 32
      It was nothing more than a Italeri fantasy
    3. +8
      21 January 2015 11: 13
      Quote: EvacuatorBobGrey666
      ours also wanted something like that: "black ghost", even a combined model from the "star", it seems, was)


      At best, this is a project left on paper, or a fantasy of Zvezda employees.
      When I was in the 6th grade, I myself assembled such a model, then I type in the search engine "Ka-58" - and bummer, there is no such helicopter recourse
      1. +3
        21 January 2015 19: 06
        And in the 90s, I remember, I saw a model of the Soviet stealth, the MIG-37, at the exhibition. It turned out to be Italeri, too, a counterweight to the American F-117.
        Even I can’t insert a picture and a smiley face ..? :(
        1. Alf
          +4
          21 January 2015 23: 14
          Quote: askold
          And in the 90s, I remember, I saw a model of the Soviet stealth, the MIG-37, at the exhibition. It turned out to be Italeri, too, a counterweight to the American F-117.
          Even I can’t insert a picture and a smiley face ..? :(

          I will help.
  4. +5
    21 January 2015 09: 19
    It is difficult to judge how good this helicopter is, because it has not entered the troops, there is no operating experience. on paper everything is beautiful. the project was removed for political reasons - why high-tech expensive car in the colonial wars. but the project can be quickly revived, because the global confrontation is back. we will see.
  5. +1
    21 January 2015 09: 21
    nobody has escaped from RPG yet. tongue
  6. +1
    21 January 2015 09: 51
    over time, helicopters will hide the main weapon in the body of the helicopter ... And all this will be done from composites and carbon fiber with an armored capsule inside. For example, the same missiles that will go into service with the PAK FA and LFI now and in the future can be easily placed on a new promising attack helicopter. Although our Alligator does not need it yet. But I am sure they are already thinking and developing it about a new attack helicopter both here and in the West.
    1. +1
      21 January 2015 17: 00
      PAK FA and a tiny helicopter are fundamentally different things.
  7. Crang
    -4
    21 January 2015 09: 53
    And yet our Mi-24 is better. He looks more like Stes.
    1. 0
      22 January 2015 17: 51
      What carries is scratched.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +1
    21 January 2015 10: 16
    An interesting car made by the Americans. He doesn’t pull on the battle, but in the reconnaissance by a raider, he probably would have pulled
  10. +5
    21 January 2015 10: 42
    The car is not bad, but everything rested on the price.
    1. -2
      21 January 2015 11: 33
      Quote: Bayonet
      The car is not bad, but everything rested on the price.

      Everything rested on the fact that UAV took over its functions
      1. +3
        21 January 2015 14: 15
        Everything rested on the fact that UAV took over its functions


        And what, the Kiowas have already been removed from service? Oops ... 90 reconnaissance and 356 reconnaissance shock.

        The loudly announced action to replace them with "Apaches" (not drones) has successfully failed. Also for financial reasons. So shta ...

        Even Americans understand that drones cannot replace combat helicopters.
  11. 0
    21 January 2015 12: 11
    He just fell under the military cuts knife
    the budget. Bad luck.
    The development is excellent. Fight at a speed of 500 km / h
    and even more have learned. No wonder they are developing
    combined helicopters with push aircraft
    screw where the speed reaches 700 km / h.
    If its noise is two times lower than that of Apache - it’s generally
    noiselessness. Apache hear only when it is already strictly
    over your head. For comparison, Cobra is heard when she is still
    a few kilometers on approach.
    And, of course, drones crippled him, as correctly noted above.
  12. +1
    21 January 2015 12: 33
    Quote: BlackJack
    It is difficult to judge how good this helicopter is, because it has not entered the troops, there is no operating experience. on paper everything is beautiful. the project was removed for political reasons - why high-tech expensive car in the colonial wars. but the project can be quickly revived, because the global confrontation is back. we will see.

    I can argue. two products underwent intensive testing in the troops, they were even in service, there was no information about participation in the database, but I think that the Americans squeezed everything out of the Comanches, appreciated, and made conclusions. The money is unlikely to be wasted.
    1. 0
      21 January 2015 13: 55
      The Boeing Sikorsky association received a contract for the development and construction of two RAH-66 Comanche helicopters. It was about demonstration copies.

      The 6 of the first RAH-66 Comanche combat helicopters were to be put into service in the 2002 year, and by 2010 the number of helicopters in combat units was to include 72 machines. However, even such a significant reduction in the order did not help.

      judging by the article, the helicopter did not enter the troops.
      and their methods of assimilating money is not the best example to follow.
      And no one said that babos was wasted.
      the project was successfully completed, all tests were carried out, the detected shortcomings were eliminated or compensated.
      no USSR — no one to fight — no helicopter needed.
      but one call - the factory archive erases the dust from the technical documentation - voila, the conveyor is running.
  13. +1
    21 January 2015 13: 47
    Not a helicopter, but a candy! Smooth contours Tail rotor in the ring! Mm-ya! For your information, such a screw is called "fenestron". Its efficiency is higher than usual. But because of the small diameter, a larger power supply is needed. "Fenestron" is irreplaceable at high speeds. "Kamanch" came close to the aircraft of the Second World War in speed and maneuverability. The fate of the helicopter is similar to that of the SR-71 black bird. It is called the "glittering failure" of engineers. The solutions tested on it will still resonate in new samples.
    1. 0
      21 January 2015 13: 59
      it’s just not his time.
      already, maybe even more.
    2. +2
      21 January 2015 14: 21
      Quote: Fobos-grunt
      Ring screw

      They wanted to replace it with a slotted version. For less noticeable, But apparently did not agree
  14. +1
    21 January 2015 14: 24
    I heard that he was "frozen" due to the appearance of drones ...
  15. -1
    21 January 2015 14: 31
    helicopters by helicopters, but our shilka, tori and beeches would give them a good farewell too
  16. 0
    21 January 2015 16: 09
    Yeah, they certainly would have given, apparently correlating with your logic since you can use a helicopter to defend an army air defense system, then you have to abandon them, and if in the atmosphere of megaton 5 you’ll gasp and ...........
    1. 0
      26 January 2015 07: 29
      Shilka for what tasks done? trolling your stupid was not enough
  17. +2
    21 January 2015 16: 20
    The most popular helicopter in computer games wassat
  18. +8
    21 January 2015 16: 50
    Although old, but still handsome!
  19. +1
    21 January 2015 19: 08
    For today. it’s entirely possible to load into air defense ... or into any missile, target images. And she herself will find the target, in the image of the enemy. Without any thermal trace.
  20. +1
    21 January 2015 19: 24
    The RAH-66 Comanche was too expensive as an AA reconnaissance helicopter, while the AH-64 Apache by that time had already firmly and permanently occupied a strike niche.
    No UAVs will be able to replace AA reconnaissance helicopters, due to the already developed tactics for the joint (massive) use of helicopters for various purposes in the U.S. Northwest.
    For 2014: 662 Kiowa OH-58A / C / D / F, 270 UH-72A Lakota (Franco-German EC-145, aka Kawasaki BK-117), another 75 units. ordered.
    1. +3
      21 January 2015 22: 11
      In fact, the Yankes have been systematically modernizing the Long Bows since 2010 in order to abandon reconnaissance vehicles in principle. They believe that this principle of application showed insufficient "stability" of the group in battle. Now any board from the group can carry out reconnaissance, give target designation More precisely, there is a continuous exchange of information, both between the aircraft and with external "terminals", including UAVs.
      1. +1
        21 January 2015 22: 43
        In fact, they abandoned OH-58D from the over-the-bus OES MMS, only as part of attack helicopter battles, now they have 8 of 24 AH-64D helicopters with radar (formerly: 18 AH-64A, 13 OH-58D). The rest are safely used for reconnaissance, surveillance, relay communications, corrections, air-guided missions, and as reconnaissance-strike.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +1
        24 January 2015 17: 37
        In general, there are examples joint simultaneous applications unmanned aircraft (UAV) and helicopters? The UAV operator is more concerned with reconnaissance of ground targets rather than airspace control. For the sake of flight safety, the army aviation (AA) helicopters themselves, UAVs are usually not used together with them, and especially when the massive use of AA is required, for example, in airmobile operations, the function is mainly on reconnaissance helicopters. UAVs are more often used for preliminary reconnaissance, and in "pinpoint" operations, with the subsequent involvement of a pair / link of tactical aviation of the Air Force, and in the final / or from one to a platoon of attack helicopters (depending on the required striking power).
        The composition of the attack helicopter battalion led from 13 AA brigades of divisional and corps subordination to the regular US Army - in 4 brigades (a total of 110 helicopters) there are 48 AH-64 Apache (2 baht-s), in 9 brigades (total 116 helicopters each) 24 AH-64 and 30 OH-58 "Kiowa" each, i.e. 1 baht each.
      4. The comment was deleted.
  21. 0
    21 January 2015 22: 00
    I would like to see all the costly projects of the military industrial complex of the USA take into account the same !!!!!!!!!!
  22. 0
    22 January 2015 10: 44
    IMHO with the advent of the serial Osprey V22 class of classic helicopters has outlived itself.
    1. 0
      22 January 2015 16: 16
      with osprey it was just a huge number of problems in the development, and some of them still have not outlived ...

      but yes, schemes combining aircraft and helicopter principles are now considered the most promising.
  23. 0
    22 January 2015 16: 27
    Maybe someone will already start to think progressively that from a physical point of view, the medium should be considered as compressible, and therefore with potential energy, and the screws should be replaced with more efficient devices. Or until the "endless" of the century, languages ​​will be sharpened - sometimes better, sometimes worse. Without understanding what, why and how and how to improve efficiency.
  24. 0
    23 January 2015 11: 52
    As for me, the most beautiful helicopter