Taming the pentagon

16
55 years ago, the Soviet Union eliminated US global invulnerability

Bearded joke “Do you want to go to America? Go serve in the rocket troops! ”Was filled with a very specific meaning 20 January 1960 year after the release of the Council of Ministers of the USSR number 60-20, adopted the intercontinental ballistic missile of the megaton class of the Soviet army.

MBR developed OKB-1, nuclear weapons - KB-11 (now VNIIEF) together with Scientific Research Institute-1011 (VNIITF). The rocket, according to the plan of her “father” Sergey Korolev, was created simultaneously as a means of nuclear deterrence and a carrier of spacecraft. The dramatic moments of the “Seven” tests are well shown in the famous film “The Taming of Fire”, where the role of the Queen (under the name of Bashkir) was performed by Kirill Lavrov. So it was: the first launch of 15 on May 1957 of the year at the Tyura-Tam test site, better known as Baikonur, was a failure (first stage failure), the second was postponed due to a control system failure, the third, 12 of July of the same year, the rocket exploded at the start. But in the fourth launch, 21 August 1957, P-7 managed to beat 5600 kilometers, reaching a given area in Kamchatka. What with pride (without details, of course) told TASS: "The other day, an ultra-long-range intercontinental multi-stage ballistic missile was launched."

A month later, with a little, 4 of October, the RV "Sputnik" - the space version of the P-7 - put the first in the near-earth orbit stories mankind artificial satellite of the Earth PS-1. The States started, a special shock was experienced at the Pentagon - after all, the Russians demonstrated not only their historical primacy in space, but also the fact that they had a formidable weapon - intercontinental ballistic missile. The first successful test of their Atlas ICBMs by Americans was only 17 December 1957 of the year.

Not for parades

Nuclear combat equipment P-7 was a monoblock warhead with a capacity of three to five megatons. The warhead weighed more than five tons. The charge itself consisted of a thermonuclear assembly (developed at SRI-1011 based on the RDS-37 charge by the Sakharov – Khariton design) and a primary nuclear charge based on the well-developed RDS-4. The thermonuclear charge for the P-7 was tested in the shell of an aerial bomb, dropping from a Tu-16 long-range bomber on Novaya Zemlya on October 6 1957, while the energy release was 2,9 megatons, 1,2 exceeding the calculated figure.

Soon, an even more advanced thermonuclear charge was created - the “49 product” (Trutnev – Babayev charge), which is characterized by an increased specific power with significantly reduced weight and size characteristics. An important innovation in the “49 product” was the boosting of the primary nuclear charge, that is, the inclusion in its design of a tritium-deuterium node, which ensures more efficient use of fissile material.

Taming the pentagonScientists of KB-25 (VNIIA) took part in the development of a nuclear weapon for the “sevens”.

The creation of the “49 product” in turn made it possible to improve the performance of the P-7 rocket. Its new version of the P-7A (8K74) could throw a lightweight three-megaton thermonuclear unit weighing 2,2 tons to a distance of 14 thousands of kilometers, and a heavy five-megaton (weight 3,7 tons) - on the 9,5 thousands of kilometers against the maximum range of 8500-XNXX .

Nevertheless, the Р-7 and Р-7А, being the first representatives of the Soviet ICBMs, turned out to be very cumbersome in themselves, difficult to use in military operations and, moreover, vulnerable to enemy attack. The fuel in them was kerosene T-1 and liquid oxygen, and the rocket could be kept for a maximum of a month in the filled state at the start.

The combat starting position under the conventional designation of the Angara object was built next to the working settlement of Plesetsk in the Arkhangelsk region (this is how the Plesetsk cosmodrome was born). The ground launch complex, which had no anti-nuclear engineering protection and was not much different from the space launch at Baikonur, consisted of a launcher with maintenance farms and a technical position, from where the rocket was delivered on rails by a railway installer.

A purely “PR” moment: across Red Square, for fear of the adversary, the hefty P-7 with the wide “skirt” of the first-stage sides was not to be driven, but Khrushchev loved how to show the world strategic missiles at the grand May 1 parades and November 7.

"Angara" guarantees

The Angara object was handed over to missilemen by 1 in January 1960 of the year, and in the same month, in accordance with a decision of the Council of Ministers, they put the first seven on combat duty. And in the spring of the same year an advanced P-7A was placed here. The combat capability of the Angara facility was proven on July 16 on the 1960 by successful combat training launches from under Plesetsk at once two P-7A missiles.

In total, the Strategic Missile Forces had four such missiles in their "hot asset", which took Washington, New York, Chicago and Los Angeles "on the fly". To hit these cities in contrast to the domestic strategic aviation they could with a XNUMX% guarantee.

Soon, in connection with the advent of new ballistic missiles, the idea to deploy a whole missile division of the “sevens” was abandoned. Four “Sevens”, already completely obsolete in combat quality, lasted until 1968, when the basis of the intercontinental arsenal of the Strategic Missile Forces were much more advanced missile-based missiles - Р-16, Р-9А, Р-36 and УР-100 (total The 909 MBR together with the “sevens” is a colossal power that made the war against the USSR senseless!).

However, the "seven", with the help of which (in the Vostok modification) 12 of April 1961 of the year was put into orbit by Yuri Gagarin’s eponymous spaceship, continues to live today as a space launch vehicle of the glorious Soyuz family. Enviable longevity! The modernization resource, pledged in his offspring by Sergei Pavlovich and his comrades, is simply amazing. And somehow the thought occurred that Korolev, creating the “seven”, was primarily thinking of the stars - not on his jacket, but on real ones - and the military mission of this rocket was for him in the background. By the way, this moment is reflected in “Taming the Fire”.

And what about the ocean?


The Americans, namely the firm Convair, developed their Atlas MBR, which also flew on oxygen and kerosene. The first production model - Atlas D - was launched, like our "seven", from an open ground table, the second one - Atlas E - was stored horizontally in an open concrete ground box (which somewhat increased resistance to a shock wave of a nuclear explosion) and before launching directly from the box (which the Americans called coffin - the coffin) was brought upright. The third model - Atlas F - was placed in the mines, but to launch, the rocket still needed to be lifted to the surface. It must be said that the Americans, thanks to the high-speed rocket fueling system developed by them, have achieved an important advantage of Atlas over the G7 in technical readiness for launch. If for P-7A, located on the launch pad, the preparation time was nine hours, then American missiles were refueled in just 15 minutes. The Atlas-based missile base could have been shot at Soviet cities in half an hour.

Atlas type MBRs were equipped with W-49 and W-38 thermonuclear warheads with a power of four megatons. In total, the United States had 129 "Atlas" in combat strength of its strategic forces, and it should be recognized that this number was enough to cause the USSR what is euphemically called unacceptable damage. They stopped combat duty in 1964 – 1965, being replaced by missiles of the Titan and Minuteman families. Like the "seven", the Atlas rocket in a modified form has been used as a space transport. For example, Pioneer interplanetary stations were launched with its help. And we recognize that this is the best use of rocket technology, which should serve the world, not war.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Gift
    -32
    24 January 2015 06: 15
    The R-7 scheme was originally developed by a group of German "invited" designers from the Gorodomlya island on Seliger, where they were placed and in the end turned out to be an ideal peacekeeping structure - almost unusable for war, but a good carrier for satellites.
    I tried to adhere to the same views in the design - so that there was an effective transport or anti-missile launcher, and the military did not fit for burning cities - it was unpleasant to evaporate.
    1. +13
      24 January 2015 08: 14
      You are fundamentally wrong. For the elimination of your excuse ignorance, I advise you to read the work of B. Ye. Chertok "Rockets and People".
      1. Gift
        -24
        24 January 2015 08: 24
        It's about a packet scheme, not a finished rocket. And if you like the action of the explosion - go to ISIS.
        1. +2
          24 January 2015 21: 18
          Quote: Gift
          It's about a packet scheme, not a finished rocket. And if you like the action of the explosion - go to ISIS.

          What forgive nonsense? The criticism was quite reasonable, but about ISIS generally killed. It’s like they used to say in the days of the USSR: you don’t want to go to a community work day, and in Africa, children are starving. Where is the causal relationship?
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +12
      24 January 2015 17: 32
      Quote: Gift
      The R-7 scheme was originally developed by a group of German "invited" designers from the Gorodomlya Island on Seliger

      This is "duck", and not in "Peking", but in "Ukrainian" or "American".
      Stupidity, bordering on the power of Psaki and Yaytsenyuk.
      I will explain:
      1.First sketch a multistage rocket was introduced in 1556 in the book of military technician Konrad Haas (Austrian, the concept of "Germany" did not exist until the 19th century)

      2: The idea of ​​using multi-stage missiles was put forward by the American engineer Robert Goddard in the 1914 year, and a patent was obtained for the invention.
      3. In 1929 K.E. Tsiolkovsky published his new book entitled “Space rocket trains.” (And he pulled the 1 step, rather than pushing (like now), tension instead of compression (cylinder / tube works better on p). 1935 year Tsiolkovsky “The Greatest rocket speed "
      4.A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4 (FAA 2) were not multi-stage.
      Work to increase the range (project A4b) - due to aerodynamic supersonic surfaces
      5.work on a powerful "transatlantic" two-stage ballistic missile (A9 / A10 - "Project America") have been conducted since 1940. cross-section two-stage rocket... And the rocket is essentially one and the same: each stage is a FAU-2 (1st 6 LPRE, 2nd FAU-2 with "wings)).

      THIS WAY AND THE AMERICANS WENT
      6. A longitudinally-divided rocket (package) is certainly not our invention, but we have MOST mastered and APPLIED. This is due to the peculiarity of the launch vehicle launch.
      We can say that we are inventors (Sergey Sergeevich Kryukov)

      the Germans had rockets bearing the body and pendant tanks,

      with us (with P-5) tank carryingand (except H-1)
      7. FAU-2 LRE with prechamber

      Our not

      8. Cooling of the walls of the CS (FAU -2 LRE) was carried out by a film of fuel, we have a TK cooling shirt
      Surely, the Germans FIRST reached the (FAU-2) -Pocket Line, i.e. went FIRST into space, but without a pilot, of course.
      1. Gift
        -5
        24 January 2015 20: 22
        Quote: opus
        8. Cooling of the walls of the CS (FAU -2 LRE) was carried out by a film of fuel, we have a TK cooling shirt

        Look at your illustration more closely - the FAU-2 engine has a double wall and the pipes at the bottom - the same cooling jacket, and not a "film of fuel".
        Aren't you too lazy to type such a long comment with nonsense?
        1. +5
          24 January 2015 20: 57
          Comrades, we need to feed the troll. I went through the comments of this "young guest VO" - this is a professional troll soldier such a gift.
          1. Gift
            -3
            24 January 2015 21: 21
            Brains need to be fed - many are emaciated. I am not a professional - a lover of looking at devouring theses - a much more entertaining television show.
            1. +2
              24 January 2015 23: 07
              Quote: Gift
              a lover to look at devouring theses - a much more entertaining television show.

              Especially such
              Quote: Gift
              The R-7 scheme was originally developed by a group of German "invited" designers from the Gorodomlya Island on Seliger

              Yes?
              let me recommend to rest

              draft decree of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR "On the organization of research and experimental work on the development of jet technology"
        2. +6
          24 January 2015 21: 30
          Quote: Gift
          Look at your illustration more closely - the FAU-2 engine has a double wall and the pipes at the bottom - the same cooling jacket, and not a "film of fuel".

          1. The wall is not double
          2.and "pipes" at the bottom
          1 and 2 EVERYTHING to create film cooling. and heating cryo TC,
          This is not a "shirt"



          Here is a cooling shirt

          left rocket engine, right solid propellant rocket engine-so for reference
          The Germans could not "afford" this process, and this is NOT NECESSARY: the caloric content of the fuel components is not the same, the heat flux density into the wall is relatively low
          The rocket engine was powered by the A-Stoff oxidizer (liquid oxygen, total in the 4900 kg tank) and B-Stoff fuel (solution from 75% ethanol and 25% water, in the 3710 kg tank).
          In principle, as with HWK 109-509C (C-Stoff (ein Gemisch aus 30% Hydrazinhydrat + 57% Methanol + 13% Wasser mit Restanteilen von Kalium-Kupfer-Cyanid) und als Oxidator T-Stoff (80per% Wasser und 20-Hydroxychinolin)

          Quote: Gift
          Aren't you too lazy to type such a long comment with nonsense?

          1. "nonsense" good "worthy" argument
          2. Do not be lazy, refute stupidity and duck.
          1. Gift
            -5
            25 January 2015 02: 31
            Quote: opus
            2. Do not be lazy, refute stupidity and duck

            You do not know the question and continue to write nonsense - the double wall in the FAU-2 engine, steel on spot welding, I saw it without illustrations from you, but the fact that you are interested in the topic is already good - you will be a local rocket launcher like Kars tanker.
    4. Kassandra
      +1
      27 January 2015 10: 50
      German "guest" designers developed the V-2 / Redstone alcohol "line" in the USA,
      kerosene R-7 was Soviet. and it was done primarily as an ICBM, and not for science.
      other means of delivering weapons of mass destruction to the United States (these included submarines from the Kyrgyz Republic and Tu-4 operating under the cover of an escort of La-11 from ice polar airfields) were not guaranteed.

      The USA lagged behind the USSR in ICBMs by about 5 years, they only had MRBMs, which is why they needed a huge fleet of "non-guaranteed" bombers ... first B-36, then B-52.
  2. sazhka4
    -19
    24 January 2015 06: 59
    It is foolish, by definition, to put on a par with the USSR and "New" Russia. Nothing new has been invented, but they managed to get on the oil "needle" and ruin everything they reached. Now is the time to shout about the former Glory and the intrigues of the bourgeois who do not allow them to budge. . "We are Ours, we will build a new world" somewhere it already happened., And it ended up known as ..
    1. itr
      +3
      24 January 2015 07: 28
      You are not right on the needle sat Brezhnev
      And in Russia, all industry except oil was destroyed
      1. s1н7т
        +1
        25 January 2015 17: 27
        The needle is secondary after the rejection of the Stalinist principles of economics. That is, all the troubles began with "Khrushche".
    2. -2
      24 January 2015 13: 02
      So sit down at the pulman or at the computer, and come up with !!! Grind good tongue! Stop moaning, whining and howling, take and do. Tell your friends, and let them pass them on to your friends. Then something will change.
      1. +4
        24 January 2015 17: 48
        Pullman is a carriage, and the drawing unit is called a Kuhlmann. This is an anachronism, no one draws on culmans. Yes, it is both unproductive and fraught with errors. Now three-dimensional graphics. And the craftsmen (for me, for example) sculpt quite serious aggregates with amazing speed.
        1. 0
          23 March 2015 14: 54
          And now, the essence of what I wrote has changed a lot? How strong? Which way? Now a spelling error solves everything, especially an error in an area completely alien to me ??? Minus further, you will not become less curved and useless from this.
  3. DPN
    +3
    24 January 2015 09: 05
    That's right, the USSR tamed the Pentagon, and our people destroyed the USSR and built the state of the bourgeoisie NEW RUSSIA many times weaker than the USSR.
    1. Lefteropoulos
      0
      24 January 2015 22: 33
      So, after all, YOUR people are not capable of anything else: they can only play on courses, on nerves, play with words, distort concepts, become obese by percentage, rest on shares
    2. s1н7т
      0
      25 January 2015 17: 32
      Quote: DPN
      That's right, the USSR tamed the Pentagon, and our people destroyed the USSR

      But jeans (Chinese) are now full, chewing gum and 500 varieties of GMO sausages. "Life is good!" (C) Low instincts destroyed the most highly organized state in the history of mankind.
  4. +5
    24 January 2015 09: 40
    Everyone in NATO should know this ... like that. negative
    1. +5
      24 January 2015 13: 46
      As an option: "Whoever comes to us with a sword - he shouts and will receive."
  5. +8
    24 January 2015 10: 21
    It should be added. The accelerated refueling of oxygen-kerosene rockets was with us. The R-9A missile (incidentally close in size to the Atlas) refuel in accelerated mode for about 10 minutes. Her shaft installation had an unrivaled degree of automation. So technically in the field of military missiles the USSR was in no way inferior to the United States.
  6. +3
    24 January 2015 14: 24
    And not so, and we are sitting on the needle. Not once already wrote about this recently. So you don’t have to find fault. Yes, and a new one has appeared. I remember the conversations of five years ago, like everything in the United States about Kay, and how everything is at our seams. And now? For example, I feel proud. Not everything has been done, but the most important thing is being done.
  7. sazhka4
    +1
    24 January 2015 15: 32
    I work. I think this is enough to ask the "government" what the hell are you doing if it doesn't get better. Everywhere Existing "guarantor" Ay ...
  8. Tribuns
    +1
    24 January 2015 20: 44
    "Who wants to do business is looking for ways, and who does not want is looking for reasons!"
    Look for ways to get into the missile forces ...
  9. +2
    24 January 2015 21: 10
    Quote: sazhka4
    I work. I think this is enough to ask the "government" what the hell are you doing if it doesn't get better. Everywhere Existing "guarantor" Ay ...

    That's the whole point. There is no clear improvement and is not expected. But there is a clear deterioration, and it looks like it will be even worse with such a government. However, the "guarantor" considers the government's work to be good. Whose point of view is he presenting? Obviously not the Russian people.
  10. +4
    25 January 2015 08: 29
    "In total, the Strategic Missile Forces had four such missiles in their 'hot assets', which took aim at Washington, New York, Chicago and Los Angeles."
    One can imagine the state of the Americans, who learned that the same fate awaited them overseas, arranged by them in Hiroshima. Three megatons per city will not seem like little. For the first time, the "masters" of the world felt their vulnerability. And instead of thinking about how to prevent nuclear madness, the Yankees began to stupidly build up their nuclear potential, plan their use in the hope of winning a nuclear war. Today their descendants are betting on a non-nuclear global strike (not forgetting about a nuclear one) and an anti-missile umbrella, such as the Aegis system. And they think they can win. You can't wash a black dog white, no matter how hard you try. A mad dog can only be driven away with a big club.
    1. Kassandra
      +1
      27 January 2015 11: 06
      not four, but depending on the years from 6 to 20, constantly refueling or refueling
      she was preparing to fly in 2 hours, which at the beginning of the war, the Americans, with an attack by bombers, allowed to release a second wave from Baikonur.
  11. 0
    25 January 2015 15: 26
    Quote: Gift
    Gift

    Quote: Gift
    double wall in the FAU-2 engine,

    Quote: Gift
    I saw him without illustrations from you

    drinks What about astrophysicists? "Congratulations, colleagues, we are watching the Supernova appear!" crying
  12. 0
    6 July 2015 17: 00
    "In total, the United States had 129 Atlases in its strategic forces, and it should be admitted that this number was enough to inflict on the USSR what is euphemistically called unacceptable damage" ???
    there is another opinion

    Evgeny Pozhidaev: Nuclear myths and atomic reality
    Details: http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1713256.html Any use of materials is allowed only if there is a hyperlink to REGNUM IA.