The modernized T-90С Tagil tank in all its glory

70
The modernized T-90С Tagil tank in all its glory


At the ongoing arms exhibition in Nizhny Tagil, the modernized T-90S tank was presented. This is a real highlight of the program, because for a long time the Russian defense industry did not represent anything like this at Nizhny Tagil Expo. The tank really can be called an excellent armored car. Compared with foreign counterparts, it is much lighter and more maneuverable, while the designers provided the car with effective means of both defense and attack. It was expected that the modernization of the T-90C would only affect the reinforcement of the side and frontal projections, but the presented version at the Prospector training ground turned out to be much more modernized than previously thought. The car is brand new. It could well be called, for example, T-92 or T-2011. However, it seems that the designers themselves have not yet decided on the name, since until recently it was a question of the T-90AM. The confusion turned out because there were some problems with declassifying the new tank. And the process of presenting this particular machine exactly at the Nizhny Tagil-2011 salon has already been launched. Uralvagonzavod did not take risks and called a completely new tank the modernization of the T-90S.

First of all, it is worth saying that now the tank does not have a turret, in the usual sense of the word, but a module. This module is literally crammed with innovative combat control systems. Now the crew commander has an autonomous opportunity to destroy the enemy's manpower, which is close to the tank. This is due to the fact that the commander can get a picture of a circular view due to the panoramic sight and prism instruments. In addition, the tank has an improved 125-mm cannon, which is made of special materials, allowing it to extend its service life even in conditions of extremely intensive use. It should be noted that foreign designers still could not solve such a problem, so in the context of direct combat contact of the Russian T-90C tank and, for example, the German Leopard, the first one has a distinct advantage due to maintaining more intense fire on the enemy guns out of action.



On the eve of the opening of the Nizhny Tagil exhibition, many have already tried to criticize the development of Uralvagonzavod in advance, indicating that the tank will not be able to resist the ATGM. However, the developers reserved a surprise for skeptics in the form of equipping the modernized T-90С with a protective complex, which makes it possible to disorient the laser-guided systems of anti-tank missiles and projectiles. It is worth saying that the tank is also reliably protected from so-called sabot shells. The protection system simply breaks the cores of this type of ammunition, making them completely helpless. The new dynamic protection system of the upgraded T-90С is so effective that no anti-tank missile known to date can hit an armored vehicle in a frontal projection. This, indeed, is striking, given the power of modern ATGM.

In addition to its reliable protection, the tank has undergone significant changes inside. Thus, the driver now had the opportunity to control an armored vehicle, not with the help of a hopelessly outdated system of levers, but on the basis of a functional steering wheel. In this case, the control can be transferred to manual mode. The T-90C is equipped with an automatic gearbox that “unties” the hands of the driver. If in previous versions of Russian tanks it had to work with the turn levers and simultaneously switch gears, then there is no such inconvenience in the modernized armored vehicle. The developers also took care of the fact that an air conditioner appeared in the tank. In other words, the days when the designers were the last to think about the crew of the car are disappearing.

Now the tank T-90C appeared and autonomous generator of electricity. Its introduction will allow to minimize the possibility of detection of the tank by the enemy in the infrared range during his stay. Previously, a tank in this state was an ideal target for the enemy. At the same time, even a disguise did not save him from the ubiquitous infrared radiation recording systems. Now the crew and the armored car itself are reliably protected even while the tank is not in a state of activity.



It is also necessary to point out that in the modernized T-90C, the ammunition load is not inside the case, as it was in previous models, but in a special module. This approach to the "storage" of shells increases the "vitality" of the tank, preventing ammunition from detonation when it enters the body of the enemy shell.

Not surprisingly, not only the Russian Ministry of Defense, but also foreign specialists became interested in such an armored vehicle.



Technical specifications

Combat weight, t: 46,5
Gun, type: 2А46М-2 mm 125 gun, smooth-bore, stabilized in two planes of guidance 
Caliber, mm: 125
Barrel length, mm: 4800
Length x height x width, mm: 6860 x 3780 x 2228
Ammunition, shots .: 42 projectile (of which 22 in the automatic loader)
Type of shots: sub-caliber armor-piercing, cumulative, high-explosive
Driven by weapon: Guided missile
Armor protection, mm: 800 — 830 mm against BPS, 1150 — 1350 mm against cumulative ammunition
Dynamic protection: built-in, "Contact-5"
Engine: V-shaped, 12-cylinder, multi-fuel Engine power, kW (hp): 1000
Maximum travel speed, km / h: 60 Suspension type: individual torsion bar
Cruising on the highway, km: 550
Depth of water obstacle to be overcome, m: 1,2 (1,8 with preliminary preparation, 5 with OPVT) "



70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    10 September 2011 08: 23
    Strong car. And the difference is revealed in the battle. Hi Taburetkin.
    1. -5
      11 September 2011 01: 24
      Taburetkin will arrive on the abrams with the Apaches ... So what? The tank is not equipped with air defense ... It's not a nuclear submarine ...
      1. +4
        11 September 2011 07: 41
        Is abrams equipped with air defense? And as far as I know, aviation is also available.
        1. Bogatir
          -3
          11 September 2011 13: 55
          But not 7,62 machine gun only
      2. svvaulsh
        +2
        14 September 2011 19: 05
        What about the submarine !? Air defense equip !? And then, in any combined arms combat, a complex of weapons is used, including air defense systems.
      3. 0
        2 December 2011 23: 55
        There are Needles and Beeches on Apache
  2. mitrich
    0
    10 September 2011 08: 26
    "Tagil rules!
  3. +7
    10 September 2011 10: 10
    Damn, I want to believe in everything that is written. And protected from ptura and protected from sub-caliber. It remains to write that it is also protected from the shock core. Here to hear more characteristics of these shots and shells.
    1. Tolia
      -1
      15 October 2011 22: 05
      and unmasking exhaust on the left side))) with an invitation to "enter" the ATGM board ...
  4. +2
    10 September 2011 10: 23
    The author did NOT write correctly. This is not the T-90S. This is the t-90AM. Firstly, secondly, he writes and shows the characteristics of the t-90 A. (Export name T-90C) This article does not describe anything about the new tank. Here's the article and photos about him more or less coincide
    http://topwar.ru/6678-vystavka-vooruzheniy-v-nizhnem-tagile-demonstraciya-zastoy

    a-otrasli.html. In the bottom video it is shown. The gun on the new tank is another 2A46M5. The engine is 1125 hp. The dynamic protection is not pin 5, but a relic.
    1. +2
      10 September 2011 10: 26
      It seems that the designers themselves have not yet decided on the name, since until recently it was about the T-90AM. The confusion turned out because there were some problems with the declassification of the new tank. And the presentation process of this particular car at the Nizhny Tagil-2011 salon has already been launched. At "Uralvagonzavod" they did not risk it and called a completely new tank the modernization of the T-90S.
    2. +3
      10 September 2011 11: 12
      author, when you make an article, add the correct photos!
      PHOTO ORDINARY T-90

      if you don’t rummage then do not write or do articles
      1. 0
        10 September 2011 11: 27
        Quote: Rustam
        PHOTO ORDINARY T-90

        On the first and second - the T-90C, on the third it stands under a tarp, and next to the T-90А. But on the fourth there is no T-90C, but this photo is also from the exhibition, I can delete it if it interferes with someone.
      2. 0
        10 September 2011 11: 49
        already better, some photos of the new tank have been added-although as a new-modernized-THIS should have been done 10 years ago, and not when the mines of defense just required it, IM give free rein they would push the old T-90 at unbelievable prices
        - questions remain
        1-reliability of new systems (their resource) - I especially care about the automatic transmission
        2-PRICE and this is decisive - I remind the price tag in 2011 for the old version stopped at the turn of 103 million rubles - how much will be required for this is unknown
        3-yes about the ACS not a word (this is decisive)
        ps-I think our creation will receive this creation in a limited amount (the trend of purchases abroad), mainly export orientation
        100 pieces will be purchased to support production

        and we will wait for a brand new car (armata or t-95) and the understanding that we need a completely new tank, I think it’s come
    3. Bogatir
      -1
      11 September 2011 13: 54
      AM would be for his army - and this will not happen.
  5. +3
    10 September 2011 11: 13
    Automatic transmission - thank God the ice has broken !!!

    In addition, the tank has an improved 125-mm gun, which is made of special materials that can extend its life even in extremely intensive use. It is worth noting that foreign designers have not yet been able to solve such a problem, therefore, in conditions of direct combat contact of the Russian T-90C tank and, for example, the German Leopard, the former has a clear advantage by conducting more intense fire at the enemy without fear of withdrawing the main guns out of order.


    The resource of the Leopard gun was higher than the domestic guns by about 2 times. It is written here that on the new model, the resource was increased, but they do not indicate how much. It may happen that the Germans still have more resources.

    However, the developers had a surprise for skeptics in the form of equipping the upgraded T-90 with a protective system that allows disorienting the laser-guided systems of anti-tank missiles and shells.

    ATGMs of the latest generation "fire-forget" do not use laser guidance.

    The new dynamic protection system of the upgraded T-90С is so effective that no anti-tank missile known today is capable of hitting an armored vehicle in the frontal projection.

    Again 25. Modern ATGMs make a slide in front of the tank (Javelin, Spike) and hit from above, but not into the frontal projection. Or hit from above without a hill (Bill2).
    Why didn’t they put KAZ?
    1. +2
      10 September 2011 13: 33
      From the video it follows that the tank is invulnerable to ATGMs in any projection. (Except for the MTO department) But nothing invulnerable. But it’s plus that the tower’s defense was strengthened from above. The final conclusions can be made in real battle. They don’t put it because there is nothing modern. The arena is already outdated. It needs to be modified or new. It does not protect the tank from ammunition attacking from above. Plus it is very expensive. 1/3 of the cost of the entire tank. Curtain-1 protects only against ATGMs of 2 generations. It seems that the T-95 was equipped with a curtain -2 and KAZ Arena at the same time. But the amount claimed for the tank is Lika. I hope that at least something will appear on Armata.
    2. Bogatir
      -2
      11 September 2011 13: 56
      Because there is no KAZ
  6. +1
    10 September 2011 11: 23
    Is the air conditioning and the box domestic or foreign interesting to me?
    22 shells are in the machine, is it a tank tower or a special module?
    1. slan
      -3
      10 September 2011 13: 22
      Quote: figvam
      Is the air conditioner and box domestic or foreign?

      Yeah, Panasonic and ZF. Joke, Baku air conditioning of course, HZ box.
    2. Bogatir
      -3
      11 September 2011 13: 57
      No real automatic gearbox
      1. Bogatir
        -2
        11 September 2011 18: 00
        This is possible so far

        http://www.armyrecognition.com/images/stories/customer/sesm/pdf/Powerpack_ESM350
        . Pdf
  7. +8
    10 September 2011 11: 27
    The question is not how the article was written, but the fact that the "ice" is really broken. What the cadre army has been waiting for so long is finally beginning to take on real shape. The car is really new. I especially pleased the ACS with fire, changes in the principle of machine control and the stable, and of course the improvement in the characteristics of weapons. Now we would wait for the purchase of this vehicle for the troops!
    1. Bogatir
      -5
      11 September 2011 13: 58
      The car is powdered old, so the Moscow Region doesn’t take it.
  8. +2
    10 September 2011 12: 35
    The question is, will the military equipment enter the troops, or is it again a publicity stunt like "we are doing no worse than others", but in fact again to defend the homeland on outdated tanks?
    1. 0
      10 September 2011 13: 35
      Well, now they’ll think in Min Oboron. They’ll tell us that tanks are not a priority for us.
    2. Bogatir
      -4
      11 September 2011 13: 58
      Yes, there is still everything there and done - then the layout
  9. CARTRIDGE
    0
    10 September 2011 15: 18
    Now, if at least 400 of them were purchased then yes (although this is also a transition model, so xs) I am also interested in the components of the tank completely domestic production or not? And aren't the words about the automatic loader going to change it?
    1. 0
      10 September 2011 18: 37
      They put it on this new tank. (Automatic loader) Under elongated ammunition. Pay attention to the shape of the tower. I know that not all of our components are available. Thermal imagers are from France. German components are there and it seems the Italians took part.
  10. +2
    10 September 2011 18: 54
    Although it seems to be known exactly what thermal imagers for the T-90A are buying Essa from France. I don’t know what the T90AM is. This is from official sources.
    1. Bogatir
      -3
      11 September 2011 13: 59
      French and worth, SM = AM almost
    2. Insurgent
      0
      11 September 2011 21: 19
      Esso makes Belarus like bearings, France purchases Catherine thermal imagers
  11. wolverine7778
    -3
    10 September 2011 20: 48
    the tank is good, but it will never meet in battle with the abrams, it will be suppressed from the air))))))))
    1. MichaelVl
      +3
      10 September 2011 21: 59
      wolverine7778,
      Just like Abrams - they will suppress from the air;)))
    2. +2
      11 September 2011 07: 50
      I repeat, we also have aviation and will reveal the most important secret: we also have air defense
      1. Bogatir
        -4
        11 September 2011 14: 00
        Maybe he means - Jewelin, Corsair, Combat, Spike?
  12. +7
    10 September 2011 20: 54
    I dare to support those who believe that the ice has broken.
    More recently, in another article, all the bones of the T-90 have been washed, maybe it’s still time to move away from the generally accepted Russian methods of criticizing everything and at least a bit to rejoice at the factory workers?
    Pros that is, anyway.
    And then neither give nor take, give birth to us "Leopard-4". And no less.
    1. Marat
      +4
      10 September 2011 21: 55
      Correctly Banshee! There are too many "crap" and pessimism on this site! Despite the "stool" or the oligarchs, there are still people who do not speak but do something - and "the ice is still moving" in many directions
    2. MichaelVl
      +2
      10 September 2011 22: 05
      Banshee
      I definitely support! Criticism is sick of nowhere else. I can not stand whiners! ..
      Three hours ago I came from Tagil from the exhibition :) I am not a military man, but the way all these cars of ours were smacked - evokes so many emotions! Uhhhh! Terminator thrashed like that, just zhzhzhzhzhit! Only did not fire rockets ... And at the end, finally, I saw live how our SU-shki flaunt the sky! Very pleasant impressions! By the way, the Urals look very formidable (I don't remember the model, the ones that are armored cars), they are hefty and formidable! "Lynx" and "Tiger" were also driven around the range.
      1. 0
        10 September 2011 22: 38
        And how did the lynx and tiger show how competitors?
        1. MichaelVl
          0
          10 September 2011 22: 52
          I don’t know how anyone :) They stood on the same platform. There was one tiger, and there were 3 different Lynxes. And at the training ground, they first drove the Lynx, and then the Tiger rode.
          1. +1
            10 September 2011 22: 59
            What did you like more, purely impressions on emotions?
            1. MichaelVl
              0
              10 September 2011 23: 11
              And here only emotions can be shared, because I didn’t drive, I didn’t sit inside (I just looked into the cab). I didn’t try to break through the armor (knocking with my fist on their skin doesn’t count :))))). Our tiger cub is sweeter to me! :) Yes, I note that the decoration of the Tiger cabin live seemed to me quite neatly performed in comparison with what I saw in the pictures on the Internet. And what about reliability and other things - let knowledgeable people write.
              1. 0
                11 September 2011 08: 06
                I envy you! White, of course, envy.
    3. Bogatir
      -4
      11 September 2011 14: 01
      He is related to Oplot, so to speak - because he repeats all the directions of modernization work.
  13. -13
    10 September 2011 22: 07
    An attempt to revive an anachronism is fraught with a lag in the field of armaments.
    It's time to switch to MBT weighing 70 tons, with a 160mm gun.
    1. MaxArt
      +2
      11 September 2011 05: 23
      It makes no sense to measure the quality of the tank using caliber and mass. That was 50 years ago, but not now. The large mass of the tank leads to a large specific pressure on the ground, and this sharply reduces the permeability. Abrams will never turn off the asphalt road - he will sit on his belly right away. The caliber of the gun is not only the additional weight and size of the ammunition that needs to be put somewhere, And the penetration ability does not depend on the caliber at all.
      1. Mesniy
        -7
        11 September 2011 17: 24
        Well, do not fuck nonsense.
      2. Bogatir
        +1
        11 September 2011 18: 15
        There is a rational grain - on the impassable roads of Russia, it will get bogged down, will not pass through most of the bridges (bridges are also built with such a design), as well as the railway platform, etc.
        Caliber is even smaller number of large shells in machine guns and styling.
    2. Mesniy
      -1
      11 September 2011 17: 24
      and what will you carry it with such weight on? And the caliber in our time does not mean anything
    3. Bogatir
      -2
      11 September 2011 17: 59
      It can not be.
  14. +4
    10 September 2011 22: 39
    We started thinking about the crew already well. Anyway, it’s not the tank that wins, but the crew. All tankers with the upcoming holiday!
  15. MichaelVl
    0
    10 September 2011 23: 19
    Mitrich,
    and you did not go to the exhibition?

    By the way, the soldier from the first roller opposite me stood when the equipment rolled around the training ground. So I confirm this video in Tagil filmed :)))
    1. mitrich
      0
      12 September 2011 20: 51
      MichaelVl,
      Was not. Was at the very first exhibition and 2007. So, in principle, everything is clear about the "zest" - T-90S and "Terminator". I have a meter TV, I looked at it from all sides smile !
      1. MichaelVl
        0
        12 September 2011 21: 12
        Well, I probably will not go in the coming years either. It was necessary to see, hear and feel when all this our equipment is naughty :)) Yes, and see the aerobatic team live. I was impressed! I am not a military man, therefore I went to satisfy my curiosity. Honestly, the organization of the show itself is very lame, there are a lot of punctures, I don’t want to write ... But I wanted to - I looked. I think this exhibition is more for the military to look at what and buy.
    2. Cuh
      Cuh
      0
      13 September 2011 13: 19
      I shot this video and the first two photos in profile on the phone winked
      I went to all exhibitions since the age of 10, specifically about this exhibition we can say that because of Putin the organization was just a mess, but apparently the tanks fired three times more than last year especially for him wink
  16. CARTRIDGE
    0
    10 September 2011 23: 35
    Quote: MichaelVl
    So I confirm this video in Tagil filmed :)))

    Tagil rules!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! wink
  17. magirus.75
    +1
    11 September 2011 06: 02
    And I want to congratulate you on Tankist Day and wish our army military happiness !!!
    1. +2
      11 September 2011 08: 08
      I will join and wish a lot of new equipment not at the landfill, but in the regiments and divisions!
      Each tanker has an air-conditioned tank, each gunner a reliable automatic loader, each driver-mechanic is a reliable automatic box!
  18. Owl
    0
    11 September 2011 15: 37
    Is the facility equipped with an external diesel power unit to provide energy when in position?
    1. Mesniy
      0
      11 September 2011 17: 25
      remote is not needed, with * published in the "national economy"
    2. Joker
      0
      11 September 2011 20: 54
      He was on the latest versions of the T-90, so I think so.
    3. slan
      0
      11 September 2011 21: 07
      The article also has:
      "Now the T-90S tank also has an autonomous power generator."
  19. slan
    -3
    11 September 2011 22: 14
    And who from the experts will explain all the same for the "especially gifted". What a tank with an old turret jumping and shooting all around, and everyone gasps about it as the latest modernization. Why at the exhibition there were two different tanks under the same name, I somehow still can understand, although with difficulty, but why serious media about completely different tanks as one say? And here in the photo and rollers again ..
    1. Joker
      -2
      11 September 2011 22: 34
      slan

      However, it seems that the designers themselves have not fully decided on the name, since until recently it was about the T-90AM. The confusion turned out because there were some problems with the declassification of the new tank. And the presentation process of this particular car at the Nizhny Tagil-2011 salon has already been launched. At "Uralvagonzavod" they did not risk it and called a completely new tank the modernization of the T-90S.



      Quote: slan
      Why, at the exhibition, two different tanks with the same name turned out to be somehow I can still understand, although with difficulty, but why do serious media talk about completely different tanks?


      - Yes, at least call them the T-54 95th, they do not understand it themselves and do not want to ask for advice.

      winked
      1. slan
        -1
        11 September 2011 23: 02
        And the sutra early in the "army store" he was driven by "Armata" at all)) and long and hard. And this is a "thematic" program on the day of the tanker ((
        But when I still saw these jumps with comments about the modernized car on the Vremya program, I seriously doubted .. Well, there should be at least a drop of professionalism somewhere, and Putin was also forced to do that? ..
        1. Joker
          0
          11 September 2011 23: 07
          They want to confuse the adversary ..

          wink
  20. +2
    12 September 2011 02: 12
    But curiously all this beauty could not be put before without scandals, or did you need a kick from my?
  21. -2
    12 September 2011 15: 33
    Even Taburetkin in some ways well done. According to Mistral, we get zenith, Lynxes dragged 10 pieces, you see the tiger is already being brought to mind. T-90 will not be purchased in its old form and there is already modernization. Jerk ahead however.
  22. 0
    12 September 2011 16: 37
    TSAMTO, September 12. The T-90S tank, which was presented at an exhibition in Nizhny Tagil, has a lot of shortcomings, while only its tower is well-made. According to RIA Novosti, the Chief of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, First Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation, Army General Nikolai Makarov, told reporters about this.
    N. Makarov noted that the T-90S tank so far “has a lot of shortcomings that are to be eliminated in the near future, the ROC for the improvement of this tank will continue,” RIA reports

    ______________________________

    I told you that ours are not going to buy it !!!!!!!
    HOW SPEAKS IT WAS NOT LONG PLAYING MUSIC
    1. Joker
      0
      12 September 2011 18: 00
      Let's see, in general it is quite logical that the new model should be run in and brought to mind.
      1. MichaelVl
        0
        12 September 2011 20: 34
        Break in, bring and take into service! Everything will be fine! :)
    2. 0
      12 September 2011 21: 01
      Failed pancake. angry
  23. slan
    0
    12 September 2011 22: 39
    Yes, of course it is a semi-finished product, not a tank.
    Previously, they learned about new models of weapons when serial production had long been debugged, "childhood diseases" had been eliminated and it was impossible to hide the arrival of new equipment in the troops. Now they will assemble a prototype on their knees and instead of a polygon, they will go to the exhibition faster.
  24. andreypilot
    0
    13 September 2011 17: 01
    But to be honest, I’ve already got confused .. The troops have T-72, T-80, and some T-90, which were adopted as the main one ... I understand that its supplies have stopped, they want an even cooler version, in quantity which the devil’s leg will break .. They abandoned one, the other is also not very good, bring to mind the third, and on the approach are basically new tanks (T-95, T-99), and meanwhile they say that all versions are good-or at the level , or superior to their Western counterparts, but they don’t take anything into service (although we’re adopting one thing, and supplying the required amount to the troops is completely different ..) Then, generally speaking at the Ivanov level, it’s better to buy a modernized T -72, raising its characteristics to T-90 ... In short, how many ministers, deputies, people responsible for this matter are so many opinions .. 7 of the nannies say ... They have the main thing now to deal with the dough that the state gave for rearmament .. Where to go .. To whom to give .. Whether to give ... We started with the Mistrals, we think about Western snipers, we finish M4 or M 16..Although for the helicopters joyfully ..
  25. andreypilot
    0
    13 September 2011 17: 14
    And I would like to wish that our "new" generals, before shouting to the whole world that our tanks and planes and other equipment -G .., think, at least about the consequences of their words .. Although, if we have the so-called Minister of Defense can send in 3 letters respected paratroopers, combat veterans, what to talk about ...
  26. panzersoldat
    0
    13 September 2011 22: 39
    Yeah. Tagil rules .... but I thought it would be better. Russia should have tanks that surpass zapodny in all respects. And here we see the well-modernized great T-72.
    T-90s is certainly good, but could be done better.
  27. -5
    14 September 2011 09: 08
    I wonder how long will the unfortunate T-72 be upgraded? This machine, by its concept, is 50 years old, inherited all the shortcomings of its ancestor, and it is not surprising that the Ministry of Defense does not want to buy it. This tank is better than its predecessors, but only a little bit ..... Tagil can’t answer the challenges of the time, well, he doesn’t get a breakthrough, for example, what Kharkov did in the early 60s with its 64th ... But there is hope since people heads of design bureaus understand this Head of Uralvagonzavod corporation Oleg Sienko said: “If we do not make new products in the next five years, we can safely write“ carts ”or“ carts ”on the products of Uralvagonzavod - this equipment will not be needed .. "We agree that today our cars are becoming obsolete, but not by the years, but by the day." It was said in 2009 and things are still there ....
    1. panzersoldat
      +1
      14 September 2011 21: 24
      Only while they’re not inventing anything fundamentally new. (Except for the Black Eagle).
      And in defense of the T-72 I can say that he has many pluses. I will not list, everyone knows.
  28. kostya
    +2
    14 September 2011 18: 26
    all the same, our weapons are the best in the world !!!
    1. LESHA pancake
      0
      14 September 2011 18: 30
      I WOULD LIKE TO BELIEVE.
  29. +1
    22 September 2011 08: 46
    I do not believe!
    Advocating it all!
    How many units in decent countries sold !?
    How many are he in the troops?
    And about protection against pturs - generally funny.
  30. Bogatir
    -1
    25 September 2011 12: 42
    So, judging by yesterday’s envy of Zavidov, the Ukrainian engine does not shine on the Russian tank. So the Russian tank was left without an engine and Russia dropped out of the club of manufacturers of modern technology. From the club of self-sufficient manufacturers of modern tanks - dropped out earlier.
  31. L. konstantin
    0
    25 September 2011 13: 05
    you think about the stronghold! before vilifying! and about your fleet! WHICH IS SOON FINALLY CRUSHING!
    1. Bogatir
      0
      25 September 2011 13: 15
      Yes - the fleet is capitalized, the Stronghold is already riveted ... And the Black Sea Fleet is crumbling - from fresh "ochakov".
  32. legionary
    0
    27 September 2011 02: 04
    I was not at this show, but judging from the video, the NOT-modernized T-90S tank is riding, and there is no T90AM on which Putin climbed!
    Probably the layout :)))
  33. 0
    28 September 2011 11: 22
    Someone will explain to me why the photos and videos have completely different tanks, the video shows the usual T-90, and the photo with Putin has a completely different tank.
    1. Joker
      0
      28 September 2011 11: 32
      Video from T-90SM / AM does not exist yet. semi-secret tank.

      They do not say that the video is new, it says "Video in the subject".
  34. lancer
    -5
    29 October 2011 20: 09
    This tank reminds me of a 10-year-old Lada car, which I want to sell at a higher price. And for this, they put on it a casting and a cool radio tape recorder and other bells and whistles, but the essence and meaning of this does not change. Lada remains Lada whatever one may say, although the price rises and some characteristics improve, but in general, alas. She will not become Japanese or European. I would really like to put these `` brilliant '' designers inside instead of the crew and send them into real battle. I wonder what kind of sensation they would have when sitting on 200 kg of gunpowder, 300 kg of TNT and surrounded by almost 800 liters of diesel fuel? Yes, the b / c not included in the AZ was taken out, but the rest remained. So it turns out from the advantages of an inconspicuous, squat, lighter. Generally constipation of engineering. It's a pity. On the street is the 21st century. It's time to create a tank of a radically new layout and equip it with a completely new weapons and fire control system, and not to waste the old one, but in a new interpretation.
    1. +1
      30 October 2011 00: 27
      Any specific suggestions?
      Or basically - so ... smart?
  35. marat1000
    0
    26 September 2013 19: 08
    They say this tank can withstand a direct hit by a nuclear warhead. love
    1. Arabist
      0
      26 September 2013 19: 12
      Yeah, probably even 20 megatons. laughing
    2. 0
      30 September 2013 13: 28
      well, if only rubber
  36. zhe602
    0
    28 October 2013 22: 46
    It is interesting to compare our newest tank with the Ukrainian - the latest modification of the T-80 (I don’t remember the letters). I believe that everything they write about the T-90 is essentially an advertising material from the marketing and sales department of UralVagonZavod. In fact, the tank is a deep modernization of the T-72, which has long established itself and is the most common, but, alas, it does not pull on a new, and even more on a next-generation tank.