The court of Kiev: Ukrainian military did not shoot down the Russian Tu-154

14
On Tuesday, the Economic Court of Kiev refused to satisfy the claim of the Russian airline Siberia in the case of the crash of the Russian passenger liner Tu-154, which was allegedly hit by a rocket during an exercise in the 2001 year.

“We won this case. The court announced the operative part - the lawsuit was denied completely, "- said the RIA News lawyer of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine Andrei Kozlov.

Oleksandr Pavlenko’s lawyer, representing Siberia’s interests in court, announced that the decision of the Kyiv Economic Court would be appealed.

The court of Kiev: Ukrainian military did not shoot down the Russian Tu-154“Of course, we will appeal this decision. I intend to contact my client now. We will take a tougher public position. We gave these six years to Ukraine a chance to sort out this court and did not go out with great criticism on the press, ”said Pavlenko.

Recall that we are talking about the tragedy that happened on October 4 2001 with the Tu-154 plane (85639 tail number), which at the height of 11 thousands of meters made a regular flight No. 1812 on the route Tel Aviv - Novosibirsk. The last time the liner contacted 13.44, after which it suddenly disappeared from the radar screens. A few hours later, wreckage of the aircraft, personal belongings of the passengers and the bodies of the dead were found on the surface of the sea. All 66 passengers and crew members were killed.

As follows from the conclusion of KNIISE, the source of damage to the aircraft could be located both outside and inside the liner, in particular, it could be an explosive device placed “between the ceiling of the inside of the aircraft” and its outer shell. A hint of a terrorist act that excludes Kiev’s responsibility for the catastrophe is more than transparent.

Immediately after publication, the conclusion of the Ukrainian commission was criticized in Russia.

The Commission of the Interstate Aviation Committee established that the airliner over the Black Sea was hit by a rocket launched by the Ukrainian military, who held exercises in the Crimea that day - the Ukrainian military confused a passenger plane with a training target. Ukraine, which at first violently denied the very possibility of its fault in the destruction of the liner, some time after the tragedy, without waiting for the results of the investigation, paid the families of the victims moral compensation in the amount of 200 thousands of dollars for each victim.

In 2004, Siberia Airlines filed a lawsuit in the Economic Court of Kiev against the Ministry of Defense and the State Treasury of Ukraine, in which it demanded to recover 15,32 million dollars from them.

In January of this year, the Ukrainian commission announced that the missile did not shoot down the Tu-154. Experts from the Kiev Forensic Research Institute (KNIISE) and the Kharkov Institute of Air Force said that the passenger liner was not hit by an anti-aircraft missile, as previously thought. Thus, they refuted not only the conclusions of the specialists of the Interstate Aviation Committee located in Moscow, made in 2004, but also numerous confessions and apologies of Ukrainian politicians and the military.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    14 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +3
      9 September 2011 14: 56
      Ukraine refutes .... This is news !! Yes, they all the time, after the collapse of the USSR, whatever, yes, they refute :) Either the results and the heroes of the Great Patriotic War, the gas contracts, now here is a long time ago PROVEN materials on "Carcass" At this rate, the guys will come to the point that, standing by the cage with an elephant, they will poke their fingers at it and yell at the whole world - THERE DOES NOT HAVE SUCH ANIMALS !!!
    2. svvaulsh
      +1
      9 September 2011 16: 04
      ...... the source of damage to the aircraft could be both outside and inside the liner .....

      Complete nonsense! By the nature of the inlet from the fragments, you can accurately determine the place of detonation (inside or outside).
      1. +4
        9 September 2011 16: 34
        without waiting for the results of the investigation, she paid moral compensation in the amount of 200 thousand dollars for each victim to the families of the victims.
        In January of this year, the Ukrainian commission announced that the missile did not bring down the Tu-154.
        Well now, following the Ukrainian logic, we must try to return compensation
        1. LESHA pancake
          0
          10 September 2011 04: 44
          Now they need to give gas and oil for free to their friends called crap.
    3. +5
      9 September 2011 17: 11
      Prostitutes ..... nothing more to add! Something I’d like to say recently - what kind of people, such a government (or people deserve their rulers) in general, as you like more! Already in almost all former union states, politics has been less established, but at the bottom ... ???
    4. mitrich
      +5
      9 September 2011 17: 34
      What country, such and such "experts" ... Because of compensation, the families of the victims are butting, like the last chmyrs, what is not clear.
      There is a conclusion of the IAC, Israeli specialists were involved in the work (the board flew from Tel Aviv), the conclusion is unequivocal - S-200! In the end, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine itself pleaded guilty 2 months after the tragedy.
      What is butting now? Scrapbookers, that's all you can write ...
      The Americans in 1988 shot down an Iranian civilian Boeing by mistake. We must pay tribute to them, they didn’t get pissed off, but quietly paid each family 1 million dollars, the families of the pilots - 1,5 million. Is Ukraine capable of such a thing?
    5. -2
      9 September 2011 18: 29
      It was necessary to immediately go to an international court - they would not get out there.
      Then they shout about independence and independence, but how to answer for their actions so all the agility evaporates.
    6. 0
      9 September 2011 18: 50
      And if they don’t pay, we turn off GAZ to obscurantists !! angry
    7. zczczc
      -2
      9 September 2011 19: 35
      Didn’t you get the idea that there are directions where there’s no reason to fly?
    8. 0
      9 September 2011 20: 11
      That's right, the aliens shot down the plane, which was personally told to the KNIISE experts.
    9. slan
      +1
      9 September 2011 20: 30
      We must give Ukraine its due, because the families of the deceased could be obliged to reimburse the Ukrainian state for the costs incurred to investigate this catastrophe, but did not begin to trifle.
      But seriously, I do not cease to be surprised at the arrogance of the Ukrainian authorities, others would somehow be embarrassed to once again excite this topic, in every possible way would try to hush up the quiet ..
      But, apparently, Ukraine simply has nothing to lose. Their image and so below any baseboards.
      But still, there must be at least some limits ..
    10. +1
      9 September 2011 21: 17
      In general, something strange is happening in Ukraine! That rocket struck eight floors of a residential building and where it came from, the plane crashed in the middle of the crowd at an air show and the pilots themselves were guilty, now the court has proved that the rocket cannot bring down the plane !! !
      Yes, things seem to be worse for you than in Russia!
    11. -1
      10 September 2011 00: 57
      yeah. it’s left to tie it somehow to the cost of gas
    12. -1
      10 September 2011 17: 04
      This is another kick in the direction of Russia to show which dishonest Russians demand a high price for gas, then they accuse that the autocrats shot down their plane. They just want to show that we are unworthy and not quite decent.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"