Military Review

Air Defense Forces Airborne completely re-equip to 2017-mu

46
The air defense units of the airborne forces of Russia will be completely re-equipped by the 2017 year, reports RIA News message of the Ministry of Defense. Such a large-scale rearmament of the airborne defense of the airborne forces is carried out for the first time.


Air Defense Forces Airborne completely re-equip to 2017-mu


“Until the end of 2015, about 60% of modern weapons will be supplied to the units and units of the airborne forces. In particular, new MANPADS with increased firing capabilities, compact low-altitude radar target detectors and automated controls with reconnaissance equipment will be supplied to the troops, ”the release said.

The rearmament must be completed by the end of 2016.

The ministry noted that “the Ivanovo, Ulyanovsk and Novorossiysk airborne formations have already received the latest anti-aircraft missile systems. In addition, about 400 airborne defense specialists have already been retrained in specialized training centers of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. "

According to the plan, by the 2020, the RF Armed Forces should be equipped with the latest weapons on 70%.
Photos used:
ria.ru
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mainbeam
    Mainbeam 13 January 2015 15: 54
    +9
    Where does the money for rearmament come from? Ships and submarines are introduced at a dozen per month, they deliver C-400, they build fighters in batches, they updated the Tu-160, they launched the Angara-5. Only the armada is still an outsider.
    1. Viktor Kudinov
      Viktor Kudinov 13 January 2015 15: 57
      22
      It doesn’t matter where the money comes from. The main thing is faster. Who did not have time - he was late! lol
      1. Mainbeam
        Mainbeam 13 January 2015 15: 58
        +4
        Quote: Victor Kudinov
        It does not matter.

        it is interesting
        1. Throw
          Throw 13 January 2015 16: 08
          +1
          Printed what the problem is! bully
      2. sabakina
        sabakina 13 January 2015 16: 58
        +3
        Ivanovskaya managed ... It pleases me. now sleep quietly boom ...
    2. svp67
      svp67 13 January 2015 16: 07
      +4
      Quote: MainBeam
      Where does the money for rearmament come from?
      From a long time ago approved BUDGET of the country. This work is not for a day, a month, or even for a year
      1. Mainbeam
        Mainbeam 13 January 2015 16: 22
        -3
        Quote: svp67
        This is work ... not even in a year

        and Serdyukov began
        and we are wearing his hat
        1. kodxnumx
          kodxnumx 13 January 2015 16: 31
          +2
          Great news, what else can I add! The Airborne Forces are Russian quick reaction troops who should be the first to rearm and get modern weapons!
        2. maratkoRuEkb
          maratkoRuEkb 14 January 2015 14: 19
          0
          not Serdyukov, but Shoigu.
  2. svp67
    svp67 13 January 2015 15: 55
    +8
    Air defense of the Airborne Forces will be completely re-equipped by 2017.
    If this happens earlier - I will not mind ...
    1. Alexey Boukin
      Alexey Boukin 13 January 2015 16: 38
      +2
      Yes, it’s time for the memory to retire, served. Good gun, but long outdated. The young generation is replacing - MANPADS and radar.
  3. Federal
    Federal 13 January 2015 15: 57
    13
    “Until the end of 2015, about 60% of modern weapons will be supplied to the air defense units and subunits of the Airborne Forces.

    Pleasant news that always takes pride in our armed forces
  4. Lopatov
    Lopatov 13 January 2015 16: 00
    22 th
    You cannot rearm what is not.
    1. gormih
      gormih 13 January 2015 16: 02
      +1
      And how is air cover provided for the airborne forces, since not?
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 13 January 2015 16: 09
        +3
        Quote: gormih
        And how is air cover provided for the airborne forces, since not?

        A strange question ... by aviation.

        Or do you think that the ZU-23-2 and MANPADS are capable of protecting airborne units from enemy aircraft?

        Well, and a number of "Strel-10", which can be transferred only by landing method.
        1. Olegovi4
          Olegovi4 13 January 2015 17: 06
          0
          Quote: Spade
          ZU-23-2 yes MANPADS able to protect units

          But what about "Tunguska"?
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 13 January 2015 17: 33
            +2
            Quote: Olegovi4
            But what about "Tunguska"?

            At the Airborne Forces?
          2. Momus
            Momus 13 January 2015 22: 05
            +1
            ZU-shki, "needles".
            Airborne defense - wow! good
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 13 January 2015 16: 44
      +5
      As I understand it, at last they again became concerned about bringing the air defense systems into the system. And then according to the results of 08.08.08, the military air defense of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation was equally dangerous for both strangers and their own.
      In any case, the air defense system is much more effective than "loose" air defense systems. Competent control center and lighting of the air situation (at least an ordinary VIKO with brief information on targets) make it possible to effectively use even MANPADS (distribute targets according to calculations, notify in time the calculations "azimuth-angle of place-time to enter the fire zone", prohibit shooting at friendly targets , limit firing at targets outside the effective engagement zone) and even organize the interaction of air defense of ground units with the aircraft.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 13 January 2015 17: 36
        +4
        Yes, they sort of began to supply the Barnaul airborne troops, which is very good.

        But the fact that they have nothing more long-range than "Strela-10" is not good at all.
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 13 January 2015 18: 36
          0
          Quote: Spade
          But the fact that they have nothing more long-range than "Strela-10" is not good at all.

          The patrimonial legacy of the Airborne Forces of the USSR: a requirement for the mandatory landing of equipment With such limitations of the MHC, it is impossible to push the normal air defense system without increasing the number of chassis beyond measure.
          Although ... it seems that recently they began to move away from mandatory airborne capability, limiting themselves to airmobility. So, perhaps, soon some "torus-light", "beech-light" or "semi-Tunguska" will appear at the Airborne Forces.
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 13 January 2015 18: 54
            0
            Arrow-10, which is already in service with the Airborne Forces, can only be deployed by landing method.
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 13 January 2015 19: 25
              0
              Yes, exactly - I forgot about the "motorcycling with anti-aircraft guided missiles".

              However, her MGH is also not very large: 12,5 tons, 6,45 * 2,85 * 2,22 m.
              The same BMD-4 is larger: 13,6 tons, 6,1 * 3,11 * 3,32 m
    3. mehanik27
      mehanik27 13 January 2015 16: 56
      +2
      Good day ... Well, why not))) They had and have air defense weapons. As far as I know, they even successfully used it once in Georgia in 2008 True on their plane, but then he himself was to blame, confused the column with the Georgian.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 13 January 2015 17: 38
        +4
        Welcome.

        You just have to write honestly. They will not "re-equip", but "will try to create a military air defense system for the airborne forces." And about a period of 2 years, it will not be enough.
        1. mehanik27
          mehanik27 13 January 2015 17: 42
          +1
          Well, nevertheless, they have units of military air defense, such as anti-aircraft battalions in the regiments and even air defense missile systems are. So they will most likely rearm and make an intelligible military air defense system
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. gormih
    gormih 13 January 2015 16: 03
    +1
    Quote: Spade
    You cannot rearm what is not.

    And how is air cover provided for the airborne forces, since not?
  7. MsRedMaster
    MsRedMaster 13 January 2015 16: 04
    +3
    Pleasant news that always takes pride in our armed forces

    But what about the 5th "element"?
  8. navara399
    navara399 13 January 2015 16: 06
    +3
    This is a necessary thing, but just why inflate it to the scale of air defense of the airborne forces. You must be more modest, more modest ...
    I do not think that it takes so long to re-equip the elite troops of the country, given that not so much is necessary for the airborne forces, given their specifics.
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 14 January 2015 00: 48
      0
      Quote: navara399
      This is a necessary thing, but just why inflate it to the scale of air defense of the airborne forces. You must be more modest, more modest ...

      we have (VA air defense) only one platoon is issued once a year, is that a lot ??? and they study not only MANPADS AND ARROWSbut tori with beeches and tungusks...
      1. mehanik27
        mehanik27 14 January 2015 09: 57
        0
        And how many platoons should be graduated? Even before the Serdyukov reform, a platoon was released and sometimes from other platoons in the Airborne Forces were released. they fled to all sorts of staff positions so that they could "grow" in rank. And they never studied TOPs with BUKs. We passed introductory studies, well, all specialties had introductory classes in all types of equipment.
  9. oksanamcarevush
    oksanamcarevush 13 January 2015 16: 07
    +2
    nda ... by 2020 still much worth surviving? if by 2017 at least! faster - faster you need to rearm ... by all possible means you need to rearm ... not forgetting about the economy and people of course ...
  10. TECHNOLOGY
    TECHNOLOGY 13 January 2015 16: 09
    +2
    Where does the money for rearmament come from?Yes, everything is fine. We draw at night! wassat The gold reserve of the country allows.-The principle is one. WANT THE WORLD-READY FOR WAR. What we do ...
  11. avvg
    avvg 13 January 2015 16: 21
    +3
    The history of Russia suggests that we are always late, until the thunder is granite, the man will not cross himself, only God forbid we have time before 2017. The current Enemy is very insidious and still has a fifth column.
  12. Noncombatant
    Noncombatant 13 January 2015 16: 24
    +1
    I do not want to do, as it is fashionable now to say "stuffing", but one nasty thought creeps in. But is it really a purchase, modernization, improvements in those volumes and quantities, as we, ordinary people, bravoly report! ?? We cannot check how many new BMD-BMPs have been delivered in six months, we cannot check the TU-160 for the availability of updated aeronautical equipment, etc. It’s very good that I’m wrong. But by analogy with the actions of our "valiant" Central Bank, such an idea appeared.
    1. Andrey Ulyanovsky
      Andrey Ulyanovsky 13 January 2015 16: 36
      +2
      http://www.sdelanounas.ru в помощь. Очень детальный анализ ребята делают в блогах "Армия", "Авиация", "Флот". Многие на ВО зарегистрированы.
  13. KOH
    KOH 13 January 2015 16: 28
    +3
    Today Shoigu announced his plans for the 15th year, I’ll be no less surprised, I remember 5 ships, 170 planes, 88 helicopters, 2 submarines, a lot of things, I don’t remember exactly, I won’t lie ... in my 1700 with more than armored vehicles
  14. Sanya Terek
    Sanya Terek 13 January 2015 16: 52
    +1
    Quote: Spade
    You cannot rearm what is not.


    There are air defense units and subunits in the airborne forces, so they will be re-equipped. The times when there was a division in the division, and a battery in the regiment, have long sunk into oblivion.
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 13 January 2015 17: 39
      +1
      Quote: Sanya Tersky
      There are air defense units and subunits in the airborne forces, so they will be re-equipped.

      Which, dear?
      1. GRAY
        GRAY 13 January 2015 20: 16
        0
        Quote: Spade
        Which, dear?

        Arrows and ZU-23, became interested in the issue and found THIS:
      2. mehanik27
        mehanik27 13 January 2015 21: 05
        +1
        5th PSA will come down ???
        1. GRAY
          GRAY 13 January 2015 21: 38
          0
          Quote: mehanik27
          5th ZRP

          Estimated composition of the air defense system:
          Strela-10 battery (3 platoons, 12 units of SZRK)
          MANPADS battery (six MANPADS platoons of 9 units each) - for transmission to battalions
          MANPADS battery (three MANPADS platoons) ...

          There is nothing serious and cannot be.
          1. mehanik27
            mehanik27 13 January 2015 21: 49
            0
            I even know how you copied it, by the way, it seems, the Arrow wasn’t in it, at least at the very beginning.
            What should have been serious there ??? A pair of Thor batteries or a Buk battalion?

            and let's complicate the task, what can you say about the 4th anti-aircraft missile regiment ??? Where did you copy about it ???
            1. GRAY
              GRAY 13 January 2015 23: 37
              -3
              Quote: mehanik27
              4th anti-aircraft missile regiment

              4 th regiment ZRV armed with C-400
              http://topwar.ru/15632-4-y-polk-zrv-vooruzhilsya-s-400.html
              smile
              1. mehanik27
                mehanik27 14 January 2015 09: 54
                +1
                yeah, you learned how to copy-paste, but you still don’t have to think))) what does it mean when we talk about airborne assault forces ??? Well, and accordingly the question was about the 4th Guards Air Defense Forces (military unit 81430), which is part of 76 guards. VDD ???
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. Smolny
    Smolny 13 January 2015 16: 56
    +1
    We have some of the most ... incomprehensible airborne divisions. For landing they are too heavy, for combined arms combat they are weak. IMHO, one of the main qualities for airborne connections should be the possibility of landing in full force.
    1. KOH
      KOH 13 January 2015 17: 23
      +4
      The most normal airborne troops we have !!!
      1. Smolny
        Smolny 13 January 2015 18: 59
        -3
        Then please tell me why the divisions landing troop Shelves Air defense?
  17. Ivan 63
    Ivan 63 13 January 2015 17: 01
    +2
    As practice shows, tank wedges are in history, and therefore our "Polite Airborne Troops" must be equipped with the most advanced weapons. Including from "restless partners"
  18. 31rus
    31rus 13 January 2015 17: 09
    +1
    Something either does not finish, or they sort out, sort out what is known, it is the modernization of land versions, and there is no complex itself with the possibility of landing, maybe I'm wrong? complex asu and that's all? Who knows, tell me, am I wrong?
    1. Lenivets
      Lenivets 13 January 2015 22: 00
      +1
      Yes. They'll just replace Igloo with Verba. This is the mystical rearmament of the air defense of the Airborne Forces.
  19. Denimax
    Denimax 13 January 2015 17: 22
    +1
    It is necessary to determine the tasks for the Airborne Forces. If they take care of land and air, then they will probably lose all value in the application.
  20. Altona
    Altona 13 January 2015 17: 32
    +1
    Something the tablet in the photo doesn’t write very accurately, during the Soviet era they wrote calligraphically, with exactly such letters ... It's all the same work, writing mirrored signs ...
  21. g1v2
    g1v2 13 January 2015 19: 34
    +1
    Quote: MainBeam
    Where does the money for rearmament come from? Ships and submarines are introduced at a dozen per month, they deliver C-400, they build fighters in batches, they updated the Tu-160, they launched the Angara-5. Only the armada is still an outsider.

    Well, the crisis is in the Russian Federation - there is no money, sanctions have finished us off, oil is getting cheaper, the ruble has collapsed - only for some reason the army is re-equipping faster, we are building a new cosmodrome, we are building a power station, ships, and we are implementing international projects. Some kind of mysticism. And at the same time, as some comrades on the site say, GDP does nothing for the country and is sold to the west. I don’t remember the truth for how much, but for some comrades everything is calculated here - how many billion, who, to whom, etc.
  22. Throw
    Throw 13 January 2015 21: 23
    0
    Yes, no mysticism, I already wrote, besides the budget, there is the possibility of targeted emission of money from the Central Bank and the funds of the Ministry of Finance. Only give a command to anyone)
  23. Deadmen
    Deadmen 13 January 2015 23: 19
    0
    I see how the RF Airborne Forces have transformed in our city.
  24. gregor6549
    gregor6549 14 January 2015 06: 04
    +1
    The news is good, but it’s not clear what is based on. If we are talking about the re-equipment of air defense of airborne defense systems and other means that have already been mastered by production, then everything is more or less clear, but when it comes to means of reconnaissance of air targets, automation of information processing and control of air defense airborne units, certain doubts arise. The fact is that the requirements for airborne equipment are very specific and not everything that is developed for dry troops satisfies these requirements. In addition, due to the fact that the amount of equipment required to equip the airborne defense of the Airborne Forces is very limited, even the developed designs will be more than difficult to place in factories for mass production. I’m a little familiar with the subject matter, as at the end of the 60x he participated in the development of automation equipment r / l / post for the Airborne and Airborne. It was possible (in those days) to push these funds into the kung placed on the GAZ 66 chassis, which provided the possibility of its transportation and landing by military transport aircraft of those years (AN12, etc.). The sample was successfully tested, but when it came to adopting the tricked out and serial production, the project was buried somewhere at the very top and the prototype quietly rusted in one of the military units of the Belarusian Military District. Of course, the efforts spent on development did not disappear at all. Then, on the basis of the 11 VP, a complex of radar automation tools was developed for SV PORI P2. But PORI P2 was already deployed in two Urals and was not quite suitable for the Airborne Forces. So, I would not call 2017 but 2027 year for more or less realistic dates for the complete re-equipment of air defense of the airborne air forces, and even if there is adequate funding, it is possible to place orders for the development and production of the required equipment in industry and immediately begin this development.