Air Defense Forces Airborne completely re-equip to 2017-mu

The air defense units of the airborne forces of Russia will be completely re-equipped by the 2017 year, reports RIA News message of the Ministry of Defense. Such a large-scale rearmament of the airborne defense of the airborne forces is carried out for the first time.

“Until the end of 2015, about 60% of modern weapons will be supplied to the units and units of the airborne forces. In particular, new MANPADS with increased firing capabilities, compact low-altitude radar target detectors and automated controls with reconnaissance equipment will be supplied to the troops, ”the release said.

The rearmament must be completed by the end of 2016.

The ministry noted that “the Ivanovo, Ulyanovsk and Novorossiysk airborne formations have already received the latest anti-aircraft missile systems. In addition, about 400 airborne defense specialists have already been retrained in specialized training centers of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. "

According to the plan, by the 2020, the RF Armed Forces should be equipped with the latest weapons on 70%.

Comments

[Mainbeam]

Where does the money for rearmament come from? Ships and submarines are introduced at a dozen per month, they deliver C-400, they build fighters in batches, they updated the Tu-160, they launched the Angara-5. Only the armada is still an outsider.

[Viktor Kudinov]

It doesn’t matter where the money comes from. The main thing is faster. Who did not have time - he was late!

[Mainbeam]

Quote: Victor Kudinov

It does not matter.

it is interesting

[Throw]

Printed what the problem is!

[sabakina]

Ivanovskaya managed ... It pleases me. now sleep quietly boom ...

[svp67]

Quote: MainBeam

Where does the money for rearmament come from?

From a long time ago approved BUDGET of the country. This work is not for a day, a month, or even for a year

[Mainbeam]

Quote: svp67

This is work ... not even in a year

and Serdyukov began
and we are wearing his hat

[kodxnumx]

Great news, what else can I add! The Airborne Forces are Russian quick reaction troops who should be the first to rearm and get modern weapons!

[maratkoRuEkb]

not Serdyukov, but Shoigu.

[svp67]

Air defense of the Airborne Forces will be completely re-equipped by 2017.

If this happens earlier - I will not mind ...

[Alexey Boukin]

Yes, it’s time for the memory to retire, served. Good gun, but long outdated. The young generation is replacing - MANPADS and radar.

[Federal]

“Until the end of 2015, about 60% of modern weapons will be supplied to the air defense units and subunits of the Airborne Forces.

Pleasant news that always takes pride in our armed forces

[Lopatov]

You cannot rearm what is not.

[gormih]

And how is air cover provided for the airborne forces, since not?

[Lopatov]

Quote: gormih

And how is air cover provided for the airborne forces, since not?

A strange question ... by aviation.

Or do you think that the ZU-23-2 and MANPADS are capable of protecting airborne units from enemy aircraft?

Well, and a number of "Strel-10", which can be transferred only by landing method.

[Olegovi4]

Quote: Spade

ZU-23-2 yes MANPADS able to protect units

But what about "Tunguska"?

[Lopatov]

Quote: Olegovi4

But what about "Tunguska"?

At the Airborne Forces?

[Momus]

ZU-shki, "needles".
Airborne defense - wow!

[Alexey RA]

As I understand it, at last they again became concerned about bringing the air defense systems into the system. And then according to the results of 08.08.08, the military air defense of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation was equally dangerous for both strangers and their own.
In any case, the air defense system is much more effective than "loose" air defense systems. Competent control center and lighting of the air situation (at least an ordinary VIKO with brief information on targets) make it possible to effectively use even MANPADS (distribute targets according to calculations, notify in time the calculations "azimuth-angle of place-time to enter the fire zone", prohibit shooting at friendly targets , limit firing at targets outside the effective engagement zone) and even organize the interaction of air defense of ground units with the aircraft.

[Lopatov]

Yes, they sort of began to supply the Barnaul airborne troops, which is very good.

But the fact that they have nothing more long-range than "Strela-10" is not good at all.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Spade

But the fact that they have nothing more long-range than "Strela-10" is not good at all.

The patrimonial legacy of the Airborne Forces of the USSR: a requirement for the mandatory landing of equipment With such limitations of the MHC, it is impossible to push the normal air defense system without increasing the number of chassis beyond measure.
Although ... it seems that recently they began to move away from mandatory airborne capability, limiting themselves to airmobility. So, perhaps, soon some "torus-light", "beech-light" or "semi-Tunguska" will appear at the Airborne Forces.

[Lopatov]

Arrow-10, which is already in service with the Airborne Forces, can only be deployed by landing method.

[Alexey RA]

Yes, exactly - I forgot about the "motorcycling with anti-aircraft guided missiles".

However, her MGH is also not very large: 12,5 tons, 6,45 * 2,85 * 2,22 m.
The same BMD-4 is larger: 13,6 tons, 6,1 * 3,11 * 3,32 m

[mehanik27]

Good day ... Well, why not))) They had and have air defense weapons. As far as I know, they even successfully used it once in Georgia in 2008 True on their plane, but then he himself was to blame, confused the column with the Georgian.

[Lopatov]

Welcome.

You just have to write honestly. They will not "re-equip", but "will try to create a military air defense system for the airborne forces." And about a period of 2 years, it will not be enough.

[mehanik27]

Well, nevertheless, they have units of military air defense, such as anti-aircraft battalions in the regiments and even air defense missile systems are. So they will most likely rearm and make an intelligible military air defense system

[gormih]

Quote: Spade

You cannot rearm what is not.

And how is air cover provided for the airborne forces, since not?

[MsRedMaster]

Pleasant news that always takes pride in our armed forces

But what about the 5th "element"?

[navara399]

This is a necessary thing, but just why inflate it to the scale of air defense of the airborne forces. You must be more modest, more modest ...
I do not think that it takes so long to re-equip the elite troops of the country, given that not so much is necessary for the airborne forces, given their specifics.

[PSih2097]

Quote: navara399

This is a necessary thing, but just why inflate it to the scale of air defense of the airborne forces. You must be more modest, more modest ...

we have (VA air defense) only one platoon is issued once a year, is that a lot ??? and they study not only MANPADS AND ARROWSbut tori with beeches and tungusks...

[mehanik27]

And how many platoons should be graduated? Even before the Serdyukov reform, a platoon was released and sometimes from other platoons in the Airborne Forces were released. they fled to all sorts of staff positions so that they could "grow" in rank. And they never studied TOPs with BUKs. We passed introductory studies, well, all specialties had introductory classes in all types of equipment.

[oksanamcarevush]

nda ... by 2020 still much worth surviving? if by 2017 at least! faster - faster you need to rearm ... by all possible means you need to rearm ... not forgetting about the economy and people of course ...

[TECHNOLOGY]

Where does the money for rearmament come from?Yes, everything is fine. We draw at night! The gold reserve of the country allows.-The principle is one. WANT THE WORLD-READY FOR WAR. What we do ...

[avvg]

The history of Russia suggests that we are always late, until the thunder is granite, the man will not cross himself, only God forbid we have time before 2017. The current Enemy is very insidious and still has a fifth column.

[Noncombatant]

I do not want to do, as it is fashionable now to say "stuffing", but one nasty thought creeps in. But is it really a purchase, modernization, improvements in those volumes and quantities, as we, ordinary people, bravoly report! ?? We cannot check how many new BMD-BMPs have been delivered in six months, we cannot check the TU-160 for the availability of updated aeronautical equipment, etc. It’s very good that I’m wrong. But by analogy with the actions of our "valiant" Central Bank, such an idea appeared.

[Andrey Ulyanovsky]

http://www.sdelanounas.ru в помощь. Очень детальный анализ ребята делают в блогах "Армия", "Авиация", "Флот". Многие на ВО зарегистрированы.

[KOH]

Today Shoigu announced his plans for the 15th year, I’ll be no less surprised, I remember 5 ships, 170 planes, 88 helicopters, 2 submarines, a lot of things, I don’t remember exactly, I won’t lie ... in my 1700 with more than armored vehicles

[Sanya Terek]

Quote: Spade

You cannot rearm what is not.

There are air defense units and subunits in the airborne forces, so they will be re-equipped. The times when there was a division in the division, and a battery in the regiment, have long sunk into oblivion.

[Lopatov]

Quote: Sanya Tersky

There are air defense units and subunits in the airborne forces, so they will be re-equipped.

Which, dear?

[GRAY]

Quote: Spade

Which, dear?

Arrows and ZU-23, became interested in the issue and found THIS:

[mehanik27]

5th PSA will come down ???

[GRAY]

Quote: mehanik27

5th ZRP

Estimated composition of the air defense system:
Strela-10 battery (3 platoons, 12 units of SZRK)
MANPADS battery (six MANPADS platoons of 9 units each) - for transmission to battalions
MANPADS battery (three MANPADS platoons) ...

There is nothing serious and cannot be.

[mehanik27]

I even know how you copied it, by the way, it seems, the Arrow wasn’t in it, at least at the very beginning.
What should have been serious there ??? A pair of Thor batteries or a Buk battalion?

and let's complicate the task, what can you say about the 4th anti-aircraft missile regiment ??? Where did you copy about it ???

[GRAY]

Quote: mehanik27

4th anti-aircraft missile regiment

4 th regiment ZRV armed with C-400
http://topwar.ru/15632-4-y-polk-zrv-vooruzhilsya-s-400.html

[mehanik27]

yeah, you learned how to copy-paste, but you still don’t have to think))) what does it mean when we talk about airborne assault forces ??? Well, and accordingly the question was about the 4th Guards Air Defense Forces (military unit 81430), which is part of 76 guards. VDD ???

[Smolny]

We have some of the most ... incomprehensible airborne divisions. For landing they are too heavy, for combined arms combat they are weak. IMHO, one of the main qualities for airborne connections should be the possibility of landing in full force.

[KOH]

The most normal airborne troops we have !!!

[Smolny]

Then please tell me why the divisions landing troop Shelves Air defense?

[Ivan 63]

As practice shows, tank wedges are in history, and therefore our "Polite Airborne Troops" must be equipped with the most advanced weapons. Including from "restless partners"

[31rus]

Something either does not finish, or they sort out, sort out what is known, it is the modernization of land versions, and there is no complex itself with the possibility of landing, maybe I'm wrong? complex asu and that's all? Who knows, tell me, am I wrong?

[Lenivets]

Yes. They'll just replace Igloo with Verba. This is the mystical rearmament of the air defense of the Airborne Forces.

[Denimax]

It is necessary to determine the tasks for the Airborne Forces. If they take care of land and air, then they will probably lose all value in the application.

[Altona]

Something the tablet in the photo doesn’t write very accurately, during the Soviet era they wrote calligraphically, with exactly such letters ... It's all the same work, writing mirrored signs ...

[g1v2]

Quote: MainBeam

Where does the money for rearmament come from? Ships and submarines are introduced at a dozen per month, they deliver C-400, they build fighters in batches, they updated the Tu-160, they launched the Angara-5. Only the armada is still an outsider.

Well, the crisis is in the Russian Federation - there is no money, sanctions have finished us off, oil is getting cheaper, the ruble has collapsed - only for some reason the army is re-equipping faster, we are building a new cosmodrome, we are building a power station, ships, and we are implementing international projects. Some kind of mysticism. And at the same time, as some comrades on the site say, GDP does nothing for the country and is sold to the west. I don’t remember the truth for how much, but for some comrades everything is calculated here - how many billion, who, to whom, etc.

[Throw]

Yes, no mysticism, I already wrote, besides the budget, there is the possibility of targeted emission of money from the Central Bank and the funds of the Ministry of Finance. Only give a command to anyone)

[Deadmen]

I see how the RF Airborne Forces have transformed in our city.

[gregor6549]

The news is good, but it’s not clear what is based on. If we are talking about the re-equipment of air defense of airborne defense systems and other means that have already been mastered by production, then everything is more or less clear, but when it comes to means of reconnaissance of air targets, automation of information processing and control of air defense airborne units, certain doubts arise. The fact is that the requirements for airborne equipment are very specific and not everything that is developed for dry troops satisfies these requirements. In addition, due to the fact that the amount of equipment required to equip the airborne defense of the Airborne Forces is very limited, even the developed designs will be more than difficult to place in factories for mass production. I’m a little familiar with the subject matter, as at the end of the 60x he participated in the development of automation equipment r / l / post for the Airborne and Airborne. It was possible (in those days) to push these funds into the kung placed on the GAZ 66 chassis, which provided the possibility of its transportation and landing by military transport aircraft of those years (AN12, etc.). The sample was successfully tested, but when it came to adopting the tricked out and serial production, the project was buried somewhere at the very top and the prototype quietly rusted in one of the military units of the Belarusian Military District. Of course, the efforts spent on development did not disappear at all. Then, on the basis of the 11 VP, a complex of radar automation tools was developed for SV PORI P2. But PORI P2 was already deployed in two Urals and was not quite suitable for the Airborne Forces. So, I would not call 2017 but 2027 year for more or less realistic dates for the complete re-equipment of air defense of the airborne air forces, and even if there is adequate funding, it is possible to place orders for the development and production of the required equipment in industry and immediately begin this development.