Main battle tank M1 Abrams - further development

First American main battle tank M1 Abrams rolled off the assembly line of a tank factory in Lyme, Ohio in February 1980. Since then (including for export), more than 10 tanks all modifications. The tank was originally designed for fighting in Europe, however, he really had to excel during the fighting in Iraq. Where, in the opinion of the US military, the tank proved to be quite effective, reliably protecting the crew from various weapons.


SEP and SEP2 programs

The SEP program was launched in 1999 year, as a digital version of the modernization, standing on armament of tanks version M1A2. This update included equipping the tank with third-generation new armor, no uranium filler, a new fully digital SLA, an 2 generation thermal imaging system for the gunner and tank commander with significantly improved target detection capabilities at any time of the day. In addition, this retrofit kit provides for equipping the tank with an auxiliary power unit for the operation of all electronic systems without switching on the engine and the thermal control system of air conditioning for electronic equipment and crew. In addition, new processors were used, the memory capacity of the machine was increased, new network communications were applied.

According to experts, the use of 2 thermal imagers of the generation allowed to increase the picture clarity by 70%, reduce the shot time by 45% and improve shooting accuracy. Deliveries of the first upgraded M1А2 SEP were launched in August 1999. Total for this program has been upgraded 1150 previously released tanks M1A2. The Saudi МХNUMXА1 was also brought to the new “digital” standard (the contract for upgrading the first 2 tanks was signed in the 60 year, the beginning of the program implementation is considered the November 2006 of the year).
Main battle tank M1 Abrams - further development

The most recent modification of the tank to date is the “digital” configuration М1А2 SEP v2. Today, under the new digital standard SEP v2, the previously released machines M1А1 are being upgraded. The new version differs from the previous "Abrams" with improved color displays that serve to display a tactical situation, new sights with electro-optical and infrared channels, new communication tools that are compatible with the networks of infantry units and formations, as well as a modified power plant. This modernization of the MBT involves the use of a number of technologies created by the program Future Combat Systems (Combat Systems of the Future). This upgrade entails bringing the 435А1 battle tanks (in service for more than 1 years) and the 20 machines М180А1 to the "digital" standard 2.

Further development М1А2

In the middle of the 90-ies, the US Army Armored Directorate presented several concepts for the further development of the МХNUMX Abrams tank. Common to all projects is the installation of a remote-controlled gun, instead of a tank tower, with a protected armor breech. This solution can significantly reduce the height of the machine and its mass. As the main weapons Existing 120-mm smooth-bore gun and prospective electromagnetic guns of various calibers were considered. The crew of the new promising tank should be reduced to 2 people due to the installation of automatic charging and automation of the guidance of the gun at the target. Due to the mass saved (due to the lack of a full-fledged turret), it is supposed to increase tank armor, bringing it in the frontal part of the hull to 1000 mm steel armor plate equivalent, and also equip the tank with built-in dynamic protection.

It was assumed that the suspension of the tank will be active, electromechanical or hydropneumatic. The tests of the latter were conducted in 1987-1989 years on 2-x specially converted tanks. At the same time, there was an increased reliability of the undercarriage. On average, during testing, the undercarriage failure was detected after 1600 km of mileage, and the estimated service life was estimated at 10 000 km. The number of smoke grenades was planned to be brought to 80 units, all of them had to be placed inside the tank corps.

Automatic loader and new experimental machine SATTV

Back in the 1987-1988 years in America, we began testing the FASTDRAW automatic loader (AZ) designed for the M1 tank by Western Design. This machine consists of 2's carousel stores with an automatic feeder and power drive. The machine provides storage, protection and supply of 36 120-mm tank shots. The rate of fire of the tank when it is used is increased to 11,6 rounds per minute. Also, this system, according to the manufacturer company, provides greater survival of the crew in comparison with those solutions that are now used in the Abrams tank. This is achieved due to the lower vulnerability of ammunition. Carousel stores are separated by an armored partition 40 mm thick, another armored partition separates the stores from the inner space of the tower. This partition is equipped with two sliding flaps, which are much smaller in size than the large sliding doors in М1А1 tanks.

As a drive of the loading mechanism, both electric and hydraulic power elements can be used (the first is safer). AZ is actuated by the gun selector switch. The machine is controlled by a microprocessor, which indicates the location of the capture of the nearest required shot and gives the command to open the outlet. After that, the shot is removed, rotated and sent to the breech of the gun by an automatic feeder. A manual backup drive is also provided, but when used, the firing rate drops noticeably to 2 shots per minute. The main disadvantages of AZ FASTDRAW, according to the statements of competent persons, is the heavy weighting of the loading design itself as compared with manual (up to 60%) and general lack of knowledge of this system as a whole.

A little apart is the program to create an experimental tank, CATTV (Componets Advanced Technology Test Bed). The purpose of its creation was demonstration tests in real conditions of MBT elements designed for advanced tanks, developed under the A3 program. Elements worked out on this platform are already included in the M1A2 upgrade and are planned to be included in the A3 version.
It was assumed that CATTV will exist in 2-x variants. The first is a machine built on the M1А1 tank chassis (this sample was completed in the 1993 year) and the second one based on a unified chassis, which in the future was to become the base for a promising tank.
Tank version with uninhabited tower

The main weapon of the SATTV was to be the 140-mm ATAS Cannon System (Advanced Tank Canon). This tool is the US contribution to the quadrilateral development program for a promising main tank, in which the United Kingdom, Germany and France also participate. This system consists of 140 smooth-bore XM291 gun, XM91 automatic loader and 140-mm ammunition family - XM964 (sub-caliber), HM965 (cumulative-explosive), XM966 (training). The muzzle energy of this gun is 2 times the 120-mm M256 gun, occupying the same volume in a static position and having less weight (by 90 kg). It is assumed that the new cannon system can be equipped with barrels of both 120 and 140 mm. They can be replaced one on another in the field in a fairly short time (about an hour).

Real prospects

After many years of discussions on the modernization of the M1 Abrams MBT, US Army specialists seem to agree that it is necessary to confine ourselves to small and least expensive improvements to the tank. There are no sufficient funds for large-scale modernization and, apparently, there will not be 5-10 years yet. So far, the US Army wants to get a tank with a lower combat mass (60 tons against today's 62 tons). For this, it is necessary to develop a new turret comparable in mass to the Leclerc's tank turret (19 tons).

The impressive combat effectiveness, which M1 Abrams showed during Iraqi companies, prompted the US Army to delay the plans for the imminent resignation of this tank. And focus on upgrading it using advanced technologies FCS (Future Combat System). None of the proposed options developed under this program could demonstrate greater potential than the tanks currently in service. Not so long ago, the FCS program was minimized.

The main efforts of American engineers plan to focus on work on the creation of a new version of the tank M1A3. It is assumed that the weight of the tank will be significantly reduced, it will receive AZ, new technologies in the form of fiber-optic wires and a light version of armor. The new chassis and engine will also contribute to weight reduction. It is assumed that the M1A3 will weigh 55 tons or even less.

Sources used:
www.btvt.narod.ru/3/blok3/blok3.htm
www.sa100.ru/armor/USA/m1_story/m1_story4.html
www.militaryparitet.com/html/data/ic_news/214/
www.army-guide.com/eng/product429.html
www.alternathistory.org.ua/novyi-variant-m1a3-e3-abrams-budet-imet-menshii-boevoi-ves
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vadivak 9 September 2011 09: 00 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    About "The impressive combat effectiveness that M1 Abrams showed during Iraqi companies" can be read by typing in a search engine - Arrows of "Sand Demons"
    1. Valentin
      Valentin 9 September 2011 10: 53 New
      • -11
      • 0
      -11
      Arrows of "Sand Demons" - a tale for fools
      1. Vadivak 9 September 2011 11: 14 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        A very reasoned comment is probably the same fools took a shot at http://btvt.narod.ru/5/iraq2003/2003.htm
        1. Phoenixl
          Phoenixl 9 September 2011 13: 46 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Yes you got it already
          You might think that the T90 does not make its way from RPG7 to board
          In M1 with a set of TUSK and TUSK 2, unlike T90A, the board is blocked by DZ
          1. makrus
            makrus 9 September 2011 14: 00 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Phoenixl
            You might think that the T90 does not make its way from RPG7 to board

            can
            1. Phoenixl
              Phoenixl 9 September 2011 15: 15 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Give us information on booking T90 sides or you yourself know who you are without PRUF
              1. makrus
                makrus 9 September 2011 15: 55 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                calm down deitel
                1. Phoenixl
                  Phoenixl 9 September 2011 20: 42 New
                  • -2
                  • 0
                  -2
                  Trololo has nothing to confirm your words?
                  You're just a dumbbell after that
          2. PSih2097 12 September 2011 12: 20 New
            • -1
            • 0
            -1
            Yes you got it already. You might think that the T90 does not make its way from RPG7 to board. In M1 with a set of TUSK and TUSK 2, unlike T90A, the board is blocked by DZ

            In a shell and armor competition, a shell almost always wins, and if it loses, then not for long.
        2. Rustam 10 September 2011 11: 58 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Do you want me to send you hundreds of photos of our charred tanks (the scene of action is Chechnya, Yugoslavia, Libya, Africa, Ossetia, Karabakh, Afghanistan)

          about the article - Arrows of "Sand Demons"

          Well, and how did it end then ???? the Iraqi army throwing everything and everyone scattered home
          1. makrus
            makrus 10 September 2011 16: 23 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Rustam, I don’t want, you won’t open anything new for me. This topic is simply overwritten with holes. I can advise you to find a movie on YouTube "Tanks in battle" IN 3 PARTS. Very interesting video.
            1. bober
              bober 9 December 2011 17: 42 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              and it’s also been proved that the T-72 and T-90 explode. That is, they detonate the ammunition. That's why they developed a fundamentally new turret. And those who are not aware of the weapons of mass destruction reach 85%, while Russian weapons are somewhere in within 55%
              1. Susul 6 September 2015 13: 24 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                In fact, it is proved that the Abrasmov BC explodes much more fun http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUYWvbBpvnk
                And in Chechnya, only 2 T-80s with a vertical AZ were lost due to the blasting of a missile, after which all T-80s were converted to a horizontal AZ. And all the photos of the torn towers are either an explosion provoked by a fire, or something weighing 400 kg of TNT arrived
          2. makrus
            makrus 10 September 2011 17: 27 New
            • -2
            • 0
            -2
            Quote: Rustam
            about the article - Arrows of "Sand Demons"
            Well, and how did it end then ???? the Iraqi army throwing everything and everyone scattered home

            This does not prove that the abrams are better booked than the t-90. Based on a comparison of the dimensions, we can say that the T-90 is better booked and has fewer weakened zones. Regarding the abrams, I would like to note that there is no data on the basis of which one could argue about its excessive survivability.
          3. Vadivak 10 September 2011 18: 01 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Rustam does not get excited, the Iraqi army and Saddam, as you know, were betrayed by the military commanders and the closest circle (excerpt) Tsar of Macedonia Philip (father of Alexander the Great) formulated the principle of bribery in the war in the form of an aphorism: "A donkey loaded with gold will take any fortress." So the Pindos bought Iraq with giblets, and as soon as the old leaders were gone, a guerrilla war broke out that the United States could not stand with the Abrams and without them, and the Arrows of the Sand Demons is an episode of the use of our weapons by disciplined and trained soldiers
  2. Leo848
    Leo848 9 September 2011 15: 50 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Do not quarrel, VET means for this are created to hit tanks. They will always be a little ahead, as they are cheaper. Compare the cost of the tank and the number of entertaining toys that can be made with this money to hit it. Economy, however ....
  3. Owl
    Owl 9 September 2011 20: 23 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    they are developing, and we are standing
    1. slan
      slan 9 September 2011 20: 54 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Oh yes)) They have already opened dynamic protection, another 5 years and will install an automatic loader, in 10 years they will reduce the mass to 55 tons, and after 20 they may be able to install a diesel engine.
      1. Vako 10 September 2011 18: 09 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        sharply noticed)))
  4. Motherland
    Motherland 19 September 2011 20: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Americans are stupid to hold on to the fact that rats and money as much as necessary are printed and bribed by scientists. And about the abbreviation "coffin on caterpillars" in the war with more developed countries and those who skated in it will receive radiation from uranium.
  5. nnz226 21 November 2011 16: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    If the Abrams fought not with stupid Arabs, who can only pray with their asses to the sky, but with skilled Chechens, then there would be so many pictures of burned Amerikosov tanks that the Internet would drown. This is about the mass of pictures of burnt Russian tanks in Chechnya
    1. bober
      bober 9 December 2011 17: 46 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Well, they were burnt not only in Chechnya, but also in Iraq, as well as in Georgia. Both Georgian and Russian. They fought the same tanks. True, the Georgians had better stuffing
  6. kov
    kov 18 July 2012 09: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Abrams in the Mud) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfqLCw5AO8I