Mozart from science. Lev Davidovich Landau

61
“Everyone has enough strength to live life with dignity. And all the talk about what a difficult time - only a clever way to justify their laziness, inaction and despondency. "
L.D. Landau


Mozart from science. Lev Davidovich Landau


Lev Landau was born on the shores of the Caspian Sea in the oil capital of the Russian Empire, Baku. In the middle of the nineteenth century, the first oil well was drilled in the nearby Bibi-Heybat village, and several years later, the new plant began to drive kerosene on an industrial scale. The big capital sensitive to the smell of money rushed to Baku in a torrent. David Lvovich Landau, the son of a learned Rabbi from Prague, had a very direct relationship to the oil boom - he worked as an engineer in a large Baku-based company. Thanks to a successful career, David Lvovich was a very wealthy man. In 1905, at the age of thirty-nine, he married a twenty-nine-year-old Lyubov Veniaminovna Garkavi - a girl of an unusual and difficult fate. She was born in a large poor family. Having saved up a certain amount of money by tutoring, Lyubov Veniaminovna spent it to pay for a training course at the University of Zurich. A year later, she continued her education in St. Petersburg at the Women's Medical Institute, after graduating from which she took up gynecology and obstetrics in Baku oil fields. The independent and independent nature of Lyubov Veniaminovna encouraged her to be active even after the wedding, despite the fact that all the material problems were in the past. She worked as a sanitary doctor, an intern at a military hospital, and a teacher.

In 1906, the first child was born in the Landau family - the son Sonya, and 22 in January 1908 the second - the son Leo. Parents attached the most serious importance to the education and upbringing of children - a French governess sat with them, drawing, gymnastics and music teachers were invited to the house. German and French languages ​​Leo and Sonia mastered to perfection in early childhood. The problems began when David and Lyubov Landau decided to instil in their children a love of music. Sonechka, after 10 years of learning the piano, at the end of her education she categorically refused to continue to approach the instrument. The future academician, who had not tolerated violence against himself since childhood, immediately resolutely refused to indulge his parents' whims. But Lev learned to read and write at the age of four. In addition, the boy passionately loved arithmetic, which forced his parents to reconsider the views on his future.

In the gymnasium, Lev greatly grieved the teacher of literature with a clumsy hand, but in exact sciences he threw teachers into awe with his knowledge. He learned to differentiate and integrate very early, but in the gymnasium these skills were not useful to him. These sections of mathematics went far beyond the framework of classical school education, and in addition the school was soon closed, and all students were dismissed for indefinite holidays. Soon, practical parents identified their son in a commercial school, later renamed the Baku Economic College. Exams for admission were not difficult, and Landau was immediately accepted on the penultimate course. Fortunately for science, at the end of the technical school, the young man was still young to work as an accountant. He made a decision to continue his education - now in Baku University.

Having brilliantly passed the entrance exams in 1922, Lev Davidovich was enrolled in two departments of the Faculty of Mathematics and Physics - a natural one (which focused on chemistry) and a mathematical one. Fourteen-year-old Landau turned out to be the youngest student at the university, but it wasn’t an age that stood out among other students. Leo, who was still quite a boy, allowed himself to argue with eminent teachers. Mathematics in an educational institution was read by a certain Lukin - a former professor of the Nikolaev Academy of the General Staff, whose ferocity firmly entered local folklore. Students behind the eyes called him "the general." Once, at a lecture, Landau ventured into a furious squabble with him. From the side it looked as if the teenager was in a cage with a tiger. However, the end turned out to be unexpected - the discouraged “general”, acknowledging his mistake, congratulated Lev Davidovich with the right decision. Since then, the professor, meeting Landau in the corridors of the university, always shook his hand. And soon the parents of the young genius received advice from university leaders to transfer their son to Leningrad, which at that time was the capital of Soviet science. Landau received a letter of recommendation from the dean of the Faculty of Physics and Mathematics, which said: “... I consider it a duty to note the extraordinary talents of this young student, with tremendous ease and with great depth at the same time passing discipline of two departments. ... I firmly believe that subsequently Leningrad University will be justly proud of having prepared an outstanding scientific figure for the country. ”

So in 1924, Lev Davidovich was in the northern capital of Russia, where he took up the science with renewed vigor. Work for eighteen hours a day is not the best way affected his health. Chronic insomnia caused Landau to turn to the doctor who categorically forbade the young man to work at night. The doctor's advice went to the future academician for the future — from that point in time and throughout his entire life, the scientist never worked again at night. And he always said about himself with a smile: “I do not have a constitution, but a reading exercise.”

At Leningrad University, Lev Davidovich first heard about quantum mechanics. Many years later, he will say: “The works of Schrödinger and Heisenberg led me into raptures. Never before have I felt with such clarity the power of human genius. ” The new physical theory was in those years in its infancy, and, as a result, there was no one to teach Landau quantum mechanics. The young man himself had to master the most complicated mathematical apparatus and the basic ideas of the new physics. As a result, he developed a characteristic style of scientific work for the rest of his life - he always preferred fresh magazines to books, saying that "thick folios do not carry anything new, they are a graveyard where the thoughts of the past are buried."

In 1927, Lev Davidovich graduated from the university and entered the postgraduate school of the Leningrad Institute of Physics and Technology (Leningrad Physical and Technical Institute), joining a group of theorists led by Jacob Frenkel. And in October, 1929 Landau, who was considered the best postgraduate student at the Physics and Technology Institute, went on his first trip abroad on the voucher of the People's Commissariat of Education. The trip was for the talented young man an extraordinary success - in Berlin at that time lived and worked a brilliant scientist, one of the founders of modern physics Albert Einstein. In Germany, Switzerland and Denmark, Max Born, Niels Bohr, Wolfgang Pauli, Erwin Schrödinger, Werner Heisenberg and other outstanding scientists, authors of quantum mechanics, worked. With Einstein, Landau met at the University of Berlin. They had a long conversation, during which Lev Davidovich, without losing time, tried to prove to the interlocutor the justice of one of the main tenets of quantum mechanics - the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The arguments and youthful enthusiasm of a twenty-year-old physicist did not convince Einstein, who was tempered in disputes with Bohr and who had all his life believed that "God does not play dice." Shortly after this conversation, Lev Davidovich, at the invitation of Max Born, visited the University of Göttingen. And in Leipzig, he met with another no less brilliant physicist, Heisenberg.

At the beginning of 1930, a Soviet scientist appeared in Copenhagen on Blegdamsvey street at number 15. This building was known throughout the world for the fact that the famous Niels Bohr lived there. As soon as he crossed the threshold of his apartment, Landau was terribly embarrassed and at the same time delighted with the greeting words of the Danish scientist: “It's great that you came to us! We will learn a lot from you! " And although it later turned out that the famous physicist out of the kindness of his soul greeted most of his guests in this way, in this case, this phrase probably sounded more appropriate than usual. The most talented, energetic and witty Landau surprisingly quickly and easily got along with the venerable scientist - the national hero of his country, but he did not lose his human simplicity and unfeigned "scientific" curiosity. The Austrian scientist Otto Frisch, who was present at one of their conversations, wrote: “This scene is forever imprinted in my memory. Landau and Bohr grappled with each other. The Russian was sitting on a bench and gesticulating frantically. Bending over him, the Dane waved his hands and shouted something. None of them even thought that there was something strange in such a scientific discussion. " Another curious sketch belongs to the Belgian physicist Leon Rosenfeld, who said: “I arrived at the institute in February 1931, and the first person I met was Georgy Gamow. I asked him about the newsand he showed me his pencil drawing. It showed Landau, tied to a chair, with his mouth tied, and Bohr, standing nearby and saying: "Wait, wait, give me at least a word to say!" Many years later, Niels Bohr admits that he always considered Lev Davidovich his best student. And the wife of the great Dane wrote in her memoirs: “Niels fell in love with Landau from the first day. He was terribly unbearable, interrupted, ridiculed, looked like a disheveled boy. But how talented he was and how truthful! "

The next stop on Landau's journey through Europe was the United Kingdom, where Paul Dirac and Ernest Rutherford worked. In those years, at the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, Pyotr Kapitsa also worked with his wit and outstanding abilities as an experimental physicist who managed to win Rutherford's disposition. Thus, for the year spent in Europe, Lev Davidovich spoke with almost all the “first-class” physicists. The works of the Soviet scientist, published during this time, received high marks and clearly showed that, despite his age, he was already one of the leading theorists in the world.

Returning to the Soviet Union in 1931, Landau found himself in the midst of a lively discussion of some discovery that promised our country incredible profits. The author of this invention, associated, by the way, with the properties of electrical insulators, was the head of the Leningrad Physical-Engineering Institute, an excellent Soviet scientist Abram Ioffe. Unfortunately, even great people are not insured against errors, and the new discovery of Ioffe just belonged to the category of errors. Very quickly, Lev Davidovich found the mistake of the master, and the enthusiasm of the discoverers turned into disappointment. In addition, the case was complicated by the fact that the young theorist was too keen on the language and did not think at all about the need to regret his colleagues' pride. The completely excusable stubbornness of Abram Fedorovich, with whom the head of the Physics and Technology Department defended his errors, led to a final break. It all ended with the fact that the famous academician publicly declared that in the last work of his graduate student there was not a drop of common sense. But Landau was not the kind of person to keep silent in response. His indulgent remark: "Theoretical physics is a complex science, and not everyone can understand it," was firmly established in the annals stories. Of course, after this incident, it became much more difficult for Lev Davidovich to work at the Leningrad Physical and Technical Institute. Much time later, he will say that he felt there "somehow uncomfortable."

Shortly before the described events, at the suggestion of the same Abram Ioffe, in the city of Kharkov - the then capital of Ukraine - the UFTI (Ukrainian Institute of Physics and Technology) was organized. In August, 1932 Landau was invited by the director of the Kharkov Physics and Technology Institute, Professor Ivan Obreimov, to take the place of the head of the theoretical department. At the same time, he took the chair of theoretical physics at the Kharkov Institute of Mechanics and Engineering. Impressed by the scientific and educational institutions seen in Europe, a twenty-four-year-old physicist set himself the task of practically creating from scratch in the Soviet Union a school of theoretical physics of the highest class. Looking ahead, we note that thanks to the efforts of Lev Davidovich, such a school in our country eventually appeared. It was formed by Landau's students, who passed his famous "theoretical minimum", which includes nine exams - seven in theoretical physics and two in mathematics. This truly unique test could have been tried no more than three times, and in twenty-five years, only forty-three people had overcome the “theoretical minimum”. The first of these was the eminent Soviet scientist Alexander Kompaneets. Evgeny Lifshits, Isaac Pomeranchuk, Alexander Akhiezer, who later became famous theoretical physicists, passed the test.

Curious is the private life of Landau. He was interested in everything that happened in the world. Every morning Lev Davidovich began with the study of newspapers. The scientist knew the story very well, he remembered by heart a lot of poems, in particular, Lermontov, Nekrasov and Zhukovsky. Loved the movie. Unfortunately, in the Kharkov period of life, Lev Davidovich was rarely photographed. On the other hand, there are quite picturesque memories left by one of his students about a scientist: “I met Landau at 1935 when I came to Kharkov for my diploma practice. Already at the first meeting, he struck me with his uncommonness: thin, tall, with curly black hair, with lively black eyes and long hands, who were actively gesticulating during the conversation, somewhat extravagantly (in my opinion) dressed. He wore an elegant blue jacket with metal buttons. Sandals with bare feet and kolomyankovye trousers were not very harmonious with them. Then he did not wear a tie, preferring to open the collar. "

Once, Professor Landau appeared at the university at the graduation party and categorically demanded that he be presented to the “most pretty girl”. He was introduced to the graduate of the chemical department Concordia (Kora) Drabantseva. If in the dreams of a scientist an image of a written beauty was painted, then the girl was very similar to her - with large gray-blue eyes, blond, with a slightly upturned nose. After the evening, Landau spent a new acquaintance to the house, and along the way he told her about foreign countries. When he learned that Cora was going to work as a technologist at a confectionery factory in the chocolate shop, he asked: “Let me call you Chocolate Girl. You know, I adore chocolate. ” When asked whether the girl had delicious chocolate in Europe, Landau replied: “I went on a business trip with state money. I could not spend it on chocolate. But I ate it in England, becoming a Rockefeller Foundation scholar. ” Their frivolous acquaintance with great difficulty over the course of several years acquired the quality of a serious relationship, since Lev Davidovich believed that “marriage is a cooperative that kills all love,” while adding that a good thing will not be called marriage. The registrar of the recognized leader of Soviet theoretical thought was brought only nine days before the birth of a child.

Separately, it is necessary to talk about the classification methodology of scientists, which was developed by Lev Davidovich and allowing to evaluate their capabilities, as well as their contribution to science. Academician Vitaly Ginzburg, who is a student of Lev Davidovich, described the “Dow scale” in his article: “Many years ago, his passion for clarity and systematization resulted in a comic classification of physicists in a logarithmic scale. In accordance with it, the physicist, for example, made the second class ten times smaller (the key word did, it was only about achievements) the physicist of the first class. On this scale, the half class had Albert Einstein, and Schrödinger, Bor, Heisenberg, Fermi, Dirac had first class. He attributed himself to the two-and-a-half class, and only, having exchanged the fifth dozen, pleased with his regular work (I remember the conversation, but forgot what achievement he was talking about), said that he had reached the second class. ”

Another Landau classification related to his relationship with the "weaker sex." The scientist divided the process of courtship into twenty-four stages, and believed that up to the eleventh the slightest hitch was disastrous. Women, of course, were also divided into classes. To the first, Landau attributed the unattainable ideal. Then came the beautiful girls, then - just pretty and pretty. The fourth class included the owners of something pleasant to the eye, and by the fifth, all the rest. To establish the fifth grade, according to Landau, it was necessary to have a chair. If you put a chair next to a fifth-grade woman, then it’s better to look not at her, but at the chair. In relation to the fair sex, the scientist also divided men into two groups: “fragrant” (which are interested in the inner content) and “beautiful”. In turn, the "beautiful" broke up into subspecies - "skaters," "Mordists," "foot," and "wrist." He attributed himself to “pure beauty”, believing that a woman should be all beautiful.

The pedagogical methods of Lev Davidovich were very different from the traditional ones, which eventually forced the university rector to take a series of actions to “educate” the teacher. Inviting Landau to his office, he expressed doubt that physics students need to know who the author of "Eugene Onegin" is and what sins are related to "mortal". This kind of questions students often heard from a young professor on exams. Of course, the correct answers did not affect performance, but the rector’s perplexity must be recognized as legitimate. In conclusion, he told Landau that "pedagogical science does not allow anything like that." “I have never heard more stupidity in my life,” Lev Davidovich answered innocently and was immediately dismissed. And although the rector could not expel the professor without the permission of the People's Commissar of Education, the victim did not waste time and energy to restore justice and left for the capital of Russia. Three weeks after leaving, Landau told Kharkiv students and colleagues that he would work for Kapitsa at the Institute for Physical Problems, writing in conclusion: "... And you have already reached the third and a half levels and can work independently."

Life at the Kapitsa Institute in those years was in full swing. The best specialists that Petr Leonidovich was looking for throughout the country worked at this place. Lev Davidovich headed his theoretical department. In 1937-1938, the helium superfluidity was discovered through experimental studies of Kapitsa. Cooling helium to temperatures close to absolute zero, physicists observed its flow through ultrathin gaps. Attempts to explain the phenomenon of superfluidity did not succeed until Landau took up the matter. The theory of superfluidity, for which he later received the Nobel Prize, was formed with a one-year break. In April, 1938 Lev Davidovich was arrested on trumped-up charges. At the Lubyanka, according to the physicist, “they tried to sew the authorship of some kind of stupid leaflet, and this with my disgust at any writings”. Kapitsa was also indignant to the depths of his soul. In the prewar years, he enjoyed considerable influence in the government and used it to help his best theorist. On the day of the arrest of the scientist, Kapitsa sent a letter to Joseph Vissarionovich, in which he said: “Comrade Stalin, today they arrested the researcher L. D. Landau. Despite his age, he is the largest theoretical physicist in our country ... There is no doubt that his loss as a scientist for the Soviet and world sciences will not pass unnoticed and will be felt very strongly. In view of the exceptional talent of Landau, I ask you to treat his case carefully. I also think it is necessary to take into account his character, which, to put it simply, is nasty. He is a bully and a bully, loves to look for mistakes in others, and when he finds them, he begins to disrespectfully tease. With this, he made many enemies for himself ... However, with all the flaws, I do not believe that Landau is capable of something dishonest. ”

By the way, the relations of two scientists, Kapitsa and Landau, have never been either friendly or close, but the “centaur,” as the institute's employees called their director, did everything possible to make the eminent theorist return to work. Not counting only on his own authority, he drew the attention of Niels Bohr to the fate of the physicist. The Danish scientist immediately responded, and also wrote a letter to Stalin, in which, among other things, he said: “... I heard rumors about the arrest of Professor Landau. I am convinced that this is a regrettable misunderstanding, because I can’t imagine that Professor Landau, who won the recognition of the scientific world for his significant contribution to atomic physics and devoted himself entirely to research work, could make something justifying the arrest ... " In April, the efforts of Petr Leonidovich 1939 were crowned with success - “on bail of Kapitsa” Landau was released from prison.

Kapitsa was well aware that the rather modest post of head of the theoretical department did not correspond much to the capabilities and scope of Landau's talent. Not once did he offer his employee assistance in creating a separate institute of theoretical physics, where Lev Davidovich could take the place of director. However, Landau categorically rejected such proposals: “I am absolutely not suitable for administrative activities. Now in Fizproblem excellent conditions for work, and of goodwill I will not go anywhere from here. ” However, the “excellent” conditions did not last long - in June 1941 the war began, and the Kapitsa Institute was evacuated to Kazan. During these years, Lev Davidovich, like many other scientists, reoriented himself to the solution of defense tasks, in particular, he dealt with problems devoted to the detonation of explosives. At 1943, the State Defense Committee decided to resume work on uranium-related topics. Igor Kurchatov was appointed research supervisor, who appealed to the government with the rationale for the theoretical study of the mechanism of a nuclear explosion and a proposal to entrust this problem to “Professor Landau — a well-known theoretical physicist, a subtle expert on such issues.” As a result, Lev Davidovich headed the work of the accounting department, who worked in the framework of the “Atomic Project”.

At 1946 at the Institute for Physical Problems, major changes occurred. Peter Kapitsa fell into disgrace, the USSR Council of Ministers dismissed him from the post of director, completely reorienting the institute to solving problems related to the “Atomic Project”. Corresponding Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences Anatoly Alexandrov was appointed as the new head of the Institute. And in the same year, Landau, bypassing the title of corresponding member, was elected a full member of the Academy of Sciences, also awarding him the Stalin Prize for the study of phase transformations. However, his main business in those years was the calculations of the processes occurring during a nuclear explosion. The merits of Lev Davidovich in the development of the atomic bomb are indisputable and were marked by two Stalin prizes (in 1949 and 1953) and the title Hero of Socialist Labor (1954). However, for the scientist himself, this work became a tragedy, since Lev Davidovich organically could not do what he was not interested in, he said about this: “Due to the brevity of life, we cannot afford the luxury of wasting time on tasks that do not lead to new results. " An example of Landau’s attitude towards a nuclear bomb is a typical episode. Once, while reading a lecture in the House of Writers, he touched on thermonuclear reactions, saying that they had no practical significance. Someone from the audience reminded the scientist about a thermonuclear bomb, to which Lev Davidovich immediately replied that it had never occurred to him to classify the bomb as a practical application of nuclear energy.

Shortly after the death of Joseph Stalin, Landau handed over all matters related to the “Atomic Project” to his pupil Isaac Khalatnikov, while he returned to the creation of the “Course of Theoretical Physics” - the work he wrote throughout his life. The “course” consisted of ten volumes, the very first of which was published in 1938, and the last two appeared in print after the death of the scientist. This work, written in a clear and lively language, is devoted to the most complex issues of modern physics. It has been translated into many languages ​​and is, without exaggeration, a reference book for every physicist in the world.

5 May 1961 Niels Bohr arrived in Moscow at the invitation of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Lev Davidovich met his teacher at the airport, and all the days of Bohr’s stay in Russia almost did not part with him. In those days, at one of the countless seminars, someone asked the guest how he created his first-class school of physicists. The famous Dane replied: "I have never been afraid to show my students that I am their dumber." Yevgeny Lifshits, who translated the scientist’s speech, made a mistake and said: “I never hesitate to tell the students that they are fools.” Peter Kapitsa reacted with a smile at the uproar: “This reservation is not accidental. It expresses the main difference between the Bohr school and the Landau school to which Lifshits belongs. ”

7 January 1962 on the way to Dubna Lev Davidovich got into a terrible car accident. Its consequences were terrible, according to the first record in the history of the disease were recorded: "fracture of the vault and skull base, multiple brain contusions, contused-torn wound in the temporal region, a squeezed chest, fracture of seven ribs, fracture of the pelvis, lung damage." The famous neurosurgeon Sergey Fedorov, who arrived at the consultation, said: “It was quite obvious that the patient was dying. Hopeless, agonizing patient. " For four days that have passed since the catastrophe, Landau was dying three times. 22 January, the scientist began swelling of the brain. In the hospital where Lev Davidovich was lying, a “physical headquarters” of eighty-seven people was organized. Landau's students, friends and colleagues were in the hospital 24 hours a day, organized consultations with foreign medical bodies, and collected the money needed for treatment. Only six weeks after the tragedy, the doctors announced that the patient’s life was out of danger. December 18 1962 Lev Davidovich said: "I lost a year, but I learned during this time that people are much better than I thought."

1 November 1962 Landau, lying in the hospital of the Academy of Sciences, delivered a telegram stating that he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for "pioneering work in the theory of condensed matter, primarily liquid helium." The next day, the ambassador of Sweden arrived at the hospital, having held the official ceremony of presenting the prestigious award. From this point on, the scientist came under close attention of the press. Not a day passed without correspondents trying to get into his room. Despite feeling unwell and warning doctors who tried to restrict access to the patient, the Nobel laureate was happy to receive everyone. A reporter from a Swedish newspaper who visited Lev Davidovich described the meeting in the following way: “Landau has turned gray, has a stick in his hands, and he moves in small steps. But once you talk to him, it becomes immediately clear that the disease has not changed him at all. There is no doubt that, if it were not for the pain, he would immediately start work ... ”.

By the way, the doctors who treated the brilliant physicist, more than once or twice had to deal with his peculiar character, which many found unbearable. One day, a famous psychiatrist and neuropathologist who treated with hypnosis came to Lev Davidovich. Landau, who called hypnosis "deception of workers", met the guest with caution. The doctor, warned, in turn, about the nature of the patient, took two more doctors to demonstrate his abilities. Shortly after the start of the session, the doctor’s assistants fell asleep. Landau himself felt uncomfortable, but he did not want to sleep. The doctor, anticipating a major failure, gathered all his will in his eyes, but the scientist only frowned and looked at his watch with impatience. After the psychiatrist left, Lev Davidovich told his wife: “Balagan. He brought a couple of geese with him, who slept here. ”

In total, the Landau hospital spent more than two years - only at the end of January 1964 was allowed to a scientist to leave the hospital room. But, despite his recovery, Lev Davidovich was no longer able to return to active work. And soon after the celebration of the sixtieth anniversary - in the morning of March 24, 1968 Landau suddenly became ill. The consultation gathered at the hospital of the Academy of Sciences called for the operation. The first three days after it, the physicist felt so good that doctors had hopes of recovery. However, on the fifth day, the patient had a fever, and the sixth began to pass the heart. On the morning of April 1, Lev Davidovich said: "I will not survive this day." He was dying in consciousness, his last words were: “I have lived a good life. I always managed everything. ” Lev Davidovich was buried at the Novodevichy Cemetery 4 on April 1968.

The question, what achievement of Landau in science should be considered the most important, has no answer. The highly specialized approach to the theory did not touch the brilliant scientist. He felt equally free in non-intersecting fields, from quantum field theory to hydrodynamics. They said about Lev Davidovich: "In this frail, fragile body is placed an entire institute of theoretical physics." Evaluate the scope of its activities in science is not given to everyone. But you can trust the words of knowledgeable people who said: “Landau created a completely new image of a scientist, some kind of a separate philosophy of life. Physics has become a kind of romantic country, a fascinating adventure ... The perfect is clothed with an extremely beautiful, magnificent form, and acquaintance with his works gives physicists tremendous aesthetic pleasure. ”

According to the materials of the books of M. Ya. Bessarab "Landau's pages of life" and "Thus spoke Landau".
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    3 January 2015 07: 43
    Greetings to all! With NEW everything you wish !!! Fellow citizens, everyone who thinksthat "... has enough strength to live a life with dignity ...", and there is RUSSIA.
    1. +1
      3 January 2015 07: 49
      Greetings to all! With NEW everything you wish !!! Fellow citizens, everyone who thinks that "... has enough strength to live a life with dignity ..." is RUSSIA.
      Good words, totally join
    2. Pervusha Isaev
      +11
      3 January 2015 08: 29
      notice how the leaders of the Soviet Union had a relationship with talented scientists — for a whole year Landau, at the expense of the USSR, could travel to Europe and communicate with people of interest to him. As for visiting places not so distant, Landau’s inconsistent language is more to blame, then they were detained for lesser sins. Stalin’s personal intervention put everything in its place.
      1. -4
        3 January 2015 08: 40
        Quote: Pervusha Isaev
        notice how the leaders of the Soviet Union had a relationship with talented scientists — for a whole year Landau at the expense of the USSR could travel to Europe and communicate with people of interest to him.

        ... and then, for many years, he could “travel” through the endless expanses of the Far North for being in contact with foreigners.

        Quote: Pervusha Isaev
        As for visiting places not so distant, Landau’s inconsistent language is more to blame, then they were detained for lesser sins. Stalin’s personal intervention put everything in its place.

        And at this time, the bourgeoisie was not imprisoned for "not keeping the language" and the personal intervention of the leader was not required.
        Scoop however. wassat
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Pervusha Isaev
          +2
          3 January 2015 10: 26
          Quote: professor
          . and then, for many years, for communication with foreigners, he "could travel" through the endless expanses of the Far North.


          do not create myths Landau spent only a year in sharaga, which, for clarity of mind, only benefited him ...

          Quote: professor
          And at this time, the bourgeoisie was not imprisoned for "not keeping the language" and the personal intervention of the leader was not required.
          Scoop however.


          according to new information, the REVOLUTION ended only before the war, when Stalin’s power became unequivocal, but all these REVERSES of collectivization, mass landings in 37g and the right and the guilty were just indicators that the revolutionary confrontation was in full swing. With whom did Stalin and the Stalinists fight? On the ground, especially Siberia, the Urals, as well as Nikita in Ukraine, all the leading posts were crammed with Trotskyists, who carried out a policy of repression, the monstrous suppression of the CHEMBARNIK rebellion alone is worth what, but we don’t know anything about it ...
          1. -5
            3 January 2015 13: 22
            Quote: Pervusha Isaev
            do not create myths Landau spent only a year in sharaga, which, for clarity of mind, only benefited him ...

            And you yourself do not want to serve a year "for the benefit"?

            Quote: Pervusha Isaev
            according to new information

            I say a scoop. There is always someone who monstrous crimes in front of his people will try to rationalize.
            1. Pervusha Isaev
              +1
              3 January 2015 13: 58
              Quote: professor
              And you yourself do not want to serve a year "for the benefit"?


              and what about me? if Landau has violated the law, then he must sit out, what's the matter? or think it was a reservation? I do not think so...

              Quote: professor
              I say a scoop.


              I understand that you do not like Soviet laws? and you think that the western type of judicial system is more perfect and humane? then can you explain how, in the light of Western democracy, the United States has the most prisoners in the world, 2.3 mil for the period of 2008? and no revolutions in America in the foreseeable past are not observed, what is happening there? I think in the United States a widespread suppression of dissent, but human rights defenders do not see this ...


              Quote: professor
              There is always someone who monstrous crimes in front of his people will try to rationalize.


              you inaccurately chose the word not "rationalize", but to explain and it seems the nightmare of those years is becoming more and more clarified, Stalin is not to blame for the mass repressions ...
              1. -1
                3 January 2015 14: 08
                Quote: Pervusha Isaev
                and what about me? if Landau has violated the law, then he must sit out, what's the matter? or think it was a reservation? I do not think so..

                Only a court can decide a venoven person or not. It is the court, not you, Stalin or anyone else.

                Quote: Pervusha Isaev
                then can you explain how, in the light of Western democracy, the United States has the most prisoners in the world, 2.3 mil for the period of 2008?

                A thief should sit in jail. And he sits there by court order.

                Quote: Pervusha Isaev
                you inaccurately chose the word not "rationalize", but to explain and it seems the nightmare of those years is becoming more and more clarified, Stalin is not to blame for the mass repressions ...

                It will soon come to the point that they will rub that there were no repressions at all.
              2. +1
                3 January 2015 14: 16
                Quote: Pervusha Isaev
                if Landau has violated the law, then he must sit out, what's the matter? or think it was a reservation? I do not think so...

                Yes, the first, Kozitsyn is now the same in Rostov in the bullpen.
                Do you think it was a reservation? I do not think so . He violated the law, he must sit out, but they just don’t put anyone in prison laughing
                1. Pervusha Isaev
                  -8
                  3 January 2015 15: 36
                  Quote: atalef
                  Yes, the first, Kozitsyn is now the same in Rostov in the bullpen.


                  can you prove a jew?
                  1. 0
                    3 January 2015 23: 25
                    What does a Jew have to do with it? Can you answer, arab? Or who are you there?
            2. -1
              3 January 2015 15: 16
              But I would sit for a year. It’s so hard for the traditionalists to get new. And even without charge. In the name of the HOMELAND it is possible and hard work.
        3. +2
          3 January 2015 12: 36
          Quote: professor
          And at this time, the bourgeoisie did not imprison anyone for "not keeping the tongue"


          Yes??!
          Tell that to the millions of Americans arrested during the "witch hunt" in the 50s ...
          1. -4
            3 January 2015 13: 23
            Quote: Rarahin
            Tell that to the millions of Americans arrested during the "witch hunt" in the 50s ...

            Tell us the names of world-famous scientists who were planted in America "for their own benefit."
            1. +6
              3 January 2015 16: 01
              The fate of the Rosenberg family doesn’t tell you anything, but how did C. Morali create the creator of the Oppenheimer nuclear bomb!
              1. +2
                4 January 2015 01: 35
                Rosenbergs executed not for scientific activity, but for intelligence
            2. +4
              3 January 2015 21: 09
              To the already mentioned names of the Rosenbergs and Oppenheimer, I can add rocketman Qian Xuesen and ... A. Einstein’s.
              Do you know the number of playwrights, composers and writers imprisoned for the slightest hint in support of communism, professor? Do you think they were arrested by the "fair American court"?

              And how many ordinary citizens have suffered from this "hunt"?
              The ratio of prisoners per 100000 population, in the USSR and the USA, in the 30-50s, do you know the defender of democracy?
        4. kompotnenado
          -1
          4 January 2015 03: 01
          So there was no Holocaust?
        5. +2
          4 January 2015 14: 53
          Quote: professor
          And at this time, the bourgeoisie did not imprison anyone for "not keeping the tongue"

          planted, Adolf Aloizovich tried
          1. 0
            4 January 2015 16: 19
            Quote: saag
            planted, Adolf Aloizovich tried

            Between Stalin and Hitler the difference is not big. I'm not talking about dictatorships. For example, about the United States. wink
            1. +3
              4 January 2015 16: 37
              Quote: professor
              Between Stalin and Hitler the difference is not big.

              Professor... hi
              With all due respect to you ...
              Do not go too far ...
              1. -3
                4 January 2015 16: 43
                Quote: stalkerwalker
                Do not go too far ...

                Cult of personality, concentration camps, torture, millions of tortured, assault on neighbors ... who am I talking about?
                1. +3
                  4 January 2015 17: 23
                  Quote: professor
                  Personality cult

                  Are you talking about GDP?
                  Quote: professor
                  concentration camps, torture

                  And this is about Guantanamo?
                  Quote: professor
                  millions of tortured

                  The Holocaust?
                  Quote: professor
                  attack on the neighbors.

                  And this fact about the IDF shelling of the Syrian neighbor and the tank biathlon of the Palestinians?

                  Professor...
                  Do not stand on a par with Svinidze and the like ...
                  I’m really ashamed of you ...
                  1. -3
                    4 January 2015 17: 26
                    Quote: stalkerwalker
                    I’m really ashamed of you ...

                    Watch yourself.

                    Cult of personality, concentration camps, torture, millions of tortured, assault on neighbors ... who am I talking about? About Stalin or Hitler?
                    1. +3
                      4 January 2015 17: 30
                      Quote: professor
                      Watch yourself.

                      IM trying thank you...
                      Forgot about the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact to mention ...
                      drinks
            2. +3
              4 January 2015 17: 11
              Quote: professor
              For example, about the United States.

              As you say
              "... The following cultural and scientific figures have been persecuted or blacklisted by McCarthyists

              Julius and Ethel Rosenberg; Communists, Soviet intelligence
              Leonard Bernstein; composer and conductor
              David Bom; physicist
              Betty Garrett; dancer and film actress
              Lee Grant; actress
              Howard Da Silva; actor
              Jules Dassin; producer
              Sam Jaffe actor
              William Edward Burkhardt Dubois; black civil rights activist, writer and historian
              Aaron Copland; composer
              Stanley Kramer; filmmaker
              Bartley Crum; the prosecutor
              Paul Felix Lazarsfeld; liberal sociologist
              Cornelius Lanczos; physicist, mathematician
              Philip Leeb; actor
              Gypsy Rose Lee; actress
              Albert Maltz; writer
              Francis Otto Mattisen; literary critic and publicist
              Arthur Miller; playwright, essayist
              Zero Mostel; actor
              Clifford Odets; playwright
              Robert Oppenheimer; physicist, "father of the atomic bomb"
              Dorothy Parker a writer
              Edward G. Robinson; actor
              Paul Robson black singer, actor, writer, public and political figure
              Waldo Salt; writer
              Pete Seeger; singer
              Edgar Snow; journalist
              Paul Sweezy Marxist economist and founder of Monthly Review
              Orson Welles; film director, actor and writer
              Howard Fast; writer
              John Hubley; animator
              Lillian Helman; playwright
              Langston Hughes; writer and publicist
              Fred Zinneman filmmaker of Austrian descent
              Qian Xuesen; creator of rocket and space technology
              Charlie Chaplin; actor and filmmaker
              Artie Shaw; jazz performer
              Albert Einstein; physicist, creator of the theory of relativity "
              1. -4
                4 January 2015 17: 13
                "blacklists", non-correspondence camps, shooting in the FBI basement?
                1. +3
                  4 January 2015 17: 20
                  Quote: professor
                  "blacklists", non-correspondence camps, shooting in the FBI basement?

                  people from the first line had an electric chair, the rest "... The most notoriously publicized investigation was the case of Alger Hiss, who was accused of espionage and was ultimately convicted of perjury. The activities of the Committee on Anti-American Activities are associated with the drawing up of so-called" black lists " The American who got on such a list was actually limited in his rights, primarily in the right to freely choose a profession. "In general, the death penalty, prison and deprivation of rights, the same as" 10 years without correspondence ", and these are only famous people
                  1. -4
                    4 January 2015 17: 27
                    Quote: saag
                    In general, the death penalty, imprisonment and deprivation of rights, the same as "10 years incommunicado"

                    Laughing out loud. Einshetyn was banned from physics, and Chaplin was deported from Hollywood and his films were "put on the shelf." Maybe enough to carry the blizzard? fool
                    1. +3
                      4 January 2015 18: 59
                      Quote: professor
                      and Chaplin was deported from Hollywood and his films were "put on the shelf."

                      "... Chaplin was denied entry to the US. With his wife and children, Chaplin settled near the town of Vevey (Switzerland). Chaplin directed his last (81st) film, The Countess from Hong Kong, in 1967. At the age of 83, he triumphantly returned to the United States to receive a special Oscar (1972). "

                      Maybe enough to carry the blizzard?

                      You are carrying the blizzard, sir, trying to show off which USA is white and fluffy, tie up to be the devil’s lawyer, be yourself
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. 0
                        5 January 2015 20: 00
                        Quote: saag
                        You are carrying the blizzard, sir, trying to show off which USA is white and fluffy, tie up to be the devil’s lawyer, be yourself

                        The USA is far from white and fluffy. What are the concentration camps for the Japanese in the United States, but America is very, very far from the crimes of the Stalinist regime.
      2. +4
        3 January 2015 16: 36
        The great theorist Lev Davidovich Landau, from April 1938 to April 1939, was imprisoned in a trumped-up denunciation. There were severe times. The blessed memory of the outstanding scientist L.D. Landau
        1. +1
          3 January 2015 17: 08
          Obviously, I personally meant the work of scientists in the "sharaga". It is simply unwise to put scientists in jails.
      3. 0
        4 January 2015 15: 59
        Quote: Pervusha Isaev
        notice how the leaders of the Soviet Union had a relationship with talented scientists — for a whole year Landau at the expense of the USSR could travel to Europe and communicate with people of interest to him.

        Such an attitude towards talented scientists was short-lived in the USSR until the beginning of intense repressions under the rule of I.V. Stalin.
  2. +5
    3 January 2015 07: 52
    One of the pillars of Russian science! Sorry to leave early ...
  3. +11
    3 January 2015 08: 05
    Lev Davidovich Landau:

    “Scientists are dogs, and then after they are taught. We are scientists! ”

    You need to know English! Even the most stupid British know him well ”

    "Is the priest of science the one who eats at the expense of science?"

    “My physique is not my body, but my body subtraction!”

    “The supreme judge of any physical theory is experience. Theorists turn sour without experimenters ”

    “Women are worthy of admiration. For a lot, but especially for their patience. I am convinced that if men had to give birth, humanity would quickly die out ”

    “Marriage is a cooperative, and it has nothing to do with love”

    “If I had as many worries as a woman has, I could not become a physicist”

    “The new theory begins to dominate when supporters of the old die out”

    “Out of nothing, and stems”

    “Successfully getting married is like pulling a blindfolded snake out of a bag of vipers."

    “The main thing in physics is the ability to neglect!”

    "Till! I went to college to scratch my tongue ”

    “If my grandmother had a mustache, then she would not be a grandmother, but a grandfather”

    “Nothing new can be learned from thick books. Thick books are a cemetery in which the ideas of the past that have served their age are buried. ”

    “A physicist seeks to make complex things simple, and a poet - simple things - complex”

    “The worst sin is to get bored! ... then a final judgment will come, the Lord God will call and ask: “Why didn’t use all the blessings of life? Why did you miss me? ”

    “I prefer to be a coward for five minutes, than my whole life - a corpse”

    “Sciences are divided into natural, unnatural and unnatural”

    “Everyone has enough strength to live a worthy life. And all this talk about what a difficult time it is is a clever way to justify your inaction, laziness and various dullnesses. It’s necessary to work, and there, you look, and times will change ”

    “The extermination of bores is the duty of every decent person. If the bore is not furious, it’s a shame for those around you. ”
    1. Pervusha Isaev
      +2
      3 January 2015 08: 35
      not to say that his sayings were particularly outstanding, in science his contribution was more significant ...
      1. +7
        3 January 2015 10: 36
        My teachers often quoted Landau, precisely his sayings! Each of them determined his attitude to what was happening around him. And the more talented the teacher was, the more often the variations on the theme of Landau sounded his jokes. Especially this one: “Everyone has the strength to live a worthy life. And all this talk about what a difficult time it is is a clever way to justify your inaction, laziness and various dullnesses. It’s necessary to work, and there, you look, and times will change ”
        1. +3
          3 January 2015 12: 50
          Quote: Tanysh
          My teachers often quoted Landau, precisely his sayings!

          My manager chair too. Although he belonged to the scientific school of N.N. Bogolyubov and soldier from the "landavs" in the defense of the Kndidat. Which, however, did not prevent him from becoming an excellent scientist, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, a professor and for a long time being at the forefront of science (FTT).
          1. 0
            3 January 2015 16: 05
            So, for "landavs" their sores and "humiliations" are important!
        2. Pervusha Isaev
          +1
          3 January 2015 15: 46
          Quote: Tanysh
          “Everyone has enough strength to live a worthy life


          in my opinion it’s something simplified and primitive, because in order for a person to WORTHLY live the life of one power is not enough, you also need to have the talent to be desirable for what work, as well as determination, and this already depends on education too, and then the society in which you live matters, in short, many prerequisites for a decent life ...
    2. +7
      3 January 2015 11: 30
      According to the stories of his contemporaries, Landau was very fond of student parties, but he did not drink himself, but tried to get all the participants drunk, often at his own expense. Once, for the "precipitated" students, he called each taxi, and the delivery addresses were written on soft spots with a chemical pencil. Landau was an ardent supporter of building socialism and the USSR in particular.
    3. +5
      3 January 2015 13: 00
      And also his favorite saying "I hear from a fool ...", even written on a medal, which was made and presented to Landau by his students.
      1. +2
        3 January 2015 13: 06
        Any real scientist in the depths of his consciousness admits to himself that he knows nothing.
    4. 0
      3 January 2015 17: 22
      Professor, I understand you .... Happy New Year!
  4. +2
    3 January 2015 10: 42
    The "Dow scale" is essentially an algorithm that Landau and other scientists subconsciously built. If scientists based their systems analysis on the method of complexity and multi-directionality, and, moreover, in the dynamics of relative interrelation, the results would be much more significant. But!!! And Newton's apple in its flight or movement must go through all the stages of an algorithmic relationship - as a process. Everything has its time, and again this is a new algorithm.
  5. -8
    3 January 2015 10: 55
    As always, in the total aggregate volume or capacity of the knowledge that the scientist left. defining remain brief and concise conclusions. So Dow said that the determining indicators of energy are vector and momentum. And that was his ultimate level to which he reached. But the impulse is an intermediate stage of the process in the system of other relationships. And the vector itself is not a distinguished private property of the process, but its mathematical orientation. Need a new math language! A new method of complex analysis of dynamic processes.
    1. +4
      3 January 2015 12: 03
      Quote: gridasov
      As always, in the total aggregate volume or capacity of the knowledge that the scientist left. defining remain brief and concise conclusions.

      Well, what such "short and laconic" (??) conclusions did Landau leave behind? The ones that the Professor brought, chtoli? Maybe you analyzed his works? And maybe you understood something in them? For example, about his diamagnetism? I, in due time, realized - I have an honest triple for his diamagnetism Yes, earned, by the way, in a terrible battle with a teacher who was a "landowner", if this term says something to you ... Maybe you have read his articles on the emission spectra of molecules? Maybe you've read Landyfshits? Total... feel And what I understood wink? According to your words, do you not know the analysis? Stop being clever from scratch. If you want to join the glorious gang of physicists, you are welcome to the nearest university to the physics department. Unlearn it as it should and go! I won’t leave you alone Yes. You touch the sacred for me without any reason am - physics.
    2. 0
      3 January 2015 12: 10
      Quote: gridasov
      Need a new math language!

      Learn the old one first. It will become easier. Yes
      Quote: gridasov
      A new method of complex analysis of dynamic processes.

      Why didn’t the classic TFKP please you? what
      All theorists are happy. Yes
      1. +1
        3 January 2015 12: 25
        Is it possible to describe the turbulent state of the hydrodynamic flow in particular algebraic equations? At each point of the stream and in the algorithms for changing the state of not only the substance of the stream, but also its kinetic component. I do not propose to analyze other points. All this is subjected to analysis in absolutely exact and not ambiguous mathematical concepts and simultaneous processes. In all groups of systemic variant transformations and relatively systemic dynamic landmarks, as flow control problems. I would be very grateful for the answer on the topic.
        1. 0
          3 January 2015 12: 41
          Quote: gridasov
          Is it possible by private solutions in the form algebraic equations describe the turbulent state of the hydro-gas-dynamic flow.

          belay What algebraic ???fool fool Partial differential second order! They describe most non-extreme processes! With analytical solutions it will be more difficult. Sometimes it is very difficult to satisfy the boundary conditions. But since the advent of numerical methods, for example, FEM, there are no problems with their solution.
          Go to the heap more MMF study. But this is only after matan. Those. somewhere... what after a year and a half pull up Yes .
          1. -1
            3 January 2015 12: 49
            I was hoping you had a sober look at the topic under discussion. But what differential equations of the second or how many more you come up with orders are not abstract and not accurate in their decisions and definitions. Or are you able to determine the boundary levels of a process within its level of transformation into new energy fractal forms.
            And what are these new numerical methods when any computer you and not you have is built on a binary code architecture. That is, everything that you will compute will always be consistently linear in its development and writing. Do not dissemble yourself.
          2. -2
            3 January 2015 13: 03
            Maybe Mr. Pensioner deigns to continue the conversation further? Then it will be possible to proceed to discuss the simple topic of how to organize a more efficient process for the outflow of hydro-gas-dynamic flow on the blades of a propeller, propeller, and subsequently turbines. It can explain to a respected connoisseur the reasons for the presence of limit levels of non-destructive rotation of such devices. Or I can tell you how to coordinate the processes of hydro-gas-dynamic flow transformation with the processes of ionization of the rotor and stator. I can explain how and at what levels of coordinated interactions various hydrodynamic flows will behave up to liquid metals.
            1. +1
              3 January 2015 13: 28
              Quote: gridasov
              Maybe Mr. Pensioner deigns to continue the conversation further?
              Well?
              Quote: gridasov
              Low-potential physical processes can be analyzed at the level of assumptions. tolerances and in the end, drive dynamic processes into the analysis of particular solutions.

              Go away, a misunderstanding. Do not embarrass yourself.
              1. -1
                3 January 2015 13: 37
                If you consider shame reasoning that you do not understand, and posts on the topic of alcohol use, dignity. That does not do you honor. You gave up quickly.
                Do you know how Sakharov’s hydrogen bomb can be upgraded? Well, yes, where do we go. That you graduated from universities.
          3. 0
            4 January 2015 12: 01
            Quote: retired
            Why didn’t the classic TFKP please you?

            Quote: retired
            Go to the heap more MMF study.

            Pensioner, do you naively believe that this shot has heard something about these subjects? laughing
            1. 0
              4 January 2015 12: 13
              I know in advance that your mind will not be enough even to come closer to understanding, but still I will be dressed up.
              So I'll tell you that we have found a method that allows you to refuse in the analysis the process of summation -integrality -multiplication and differentiation-subtraction and division. AND!!! The analysis is carried out exclusively on the comparability of the basic parameters of numbers. Then it becomes possible to create systems of number series. Pure numerical algorithms In other words, the depth of infinity does not differ in its simplicity from simple comparison. But !!! algorithms allow creating directed and comparable "calculations" for all vectors of space and more to consider them in dynamics. Ultimately, one must see that the speed of analysis is carried out by the potential ability of the system itself, and not by mechanical actions, which are both energy-consuming and only one-directed. In fact, all this is already being used and embodied in a practical solution to a fundamental problem of a technical nature, which makes it possible to make a breakthrough in the energy sector, etc.
            2. 0
              4 January 2015 12: 23
              For you personally, I’ll even say that I can determine in advance what you will say next. In mathematics, you are in a stupor. You are soldiers. Mindless performers. Machines robotic machines. Intelligence and individual analysis for you is not a known state of reasoning. Any force causes a reaction. People like you will never understand why the kinetic energy of a hydrodynamic flow causes an equivalent increase in the potential energy of this flow through a change in its structure of matter. You will always prove your significance, but you will never be scientists, because for such people truth is an abstract concept
      2. -1
        3 January 2015 12: 32
        Why not happy. Low-potential physical processes can be analyzed at the level of assumptions. tolerances and in the end, drive dynamic processes into the analysis of particular solutions. I hope you understand my idea. Will explain. While you are analyzing a certain process parameter in a dynamic transformation, its state has already been transformed many times. How can you analyze a condition such as hydro gas. flow in its varying degrees of such dynamic transformations.
    3. +2
      3 January 2015 17: 32
      Quote: gridasov
      Need a new math language!

      God have mercy - the word is yours ...
  6. -7
    3 January 2015 12: 15
    I also read other essays on Landau. Not as outstanding as it is described. And you can describe postmortem as you like. Whether Napoleon, or Mozart, or Aristotle. IMHO - Landau is a smart and cunning Jew. Where there was not enough intelligence was covered with cunning. I created a positive image for myself with jokes. I'm not sure that a joking "researcher" is more effective than a "bore". An example is Perelman.
    1. -2
      3 January 2015 12: 40
      Correct me if I'm wrong. Perelman argued or challenged. analysis of the process of transformation of topological space. And the essence of this transformation was that in the most exaggerated form, that if we increase the potential difference over a segment of a certain measure, then it tends to transform the contour into a circle. That is, the system seeks to balance the email. magnetic circuit. But!!! Firstly, if I am right, then we are witnessing a dynamic process. Is it possible to subject the dynamic process to analysis in the form of particular solutions?
      PS I can cite a dozen obvious factors of influence on this process and as many non-obvious ones. And all these processes and factors at some point in their successive transformations can turn from little meaning and not obvious to dominant in their influence. So how can one describe a whole lot of events using one method of mathematical analysis as a particular solution?
    2. +4
      3 January 2015 17: 38
      Quote: ohtandur
      IMHO - Landau is a smart and cunning Jew.

      And you - a miserable, insignificant person, take the right to trample into the mud such people who glorified our country, recognized around the world ????! Are such vile bastards trying to portray themselves as patriots? You are a disgrace to Russia !!!!!!!!
      1. 11111mail.ru
        0
        4 January 2015 09: 13
        Quote: Bayonet
        You shame of Russia!!!!!!!

        You on his check box would?
  7. +7
    3 January 2015 13: 18
    His physics textbooks are very good!
    1. +3
      3 January 2015 13: 24
      Quote: Egor65G
      His physics textbooks are very good!

      I agree. I especially liked the "mechanics". The thinnest ... feel
      1. +1
        3 January 2015 13: 45
        And I read all his textbooks smile Like 4re thick volumes. Everything is very simple and intelligible on the shelves laid out!
        1. 0
          3 January 2015 14: 12
          Quote: Egor65G
          Everything is very simple and intelligible on the shelves laid out!

          But not quanta. Tricky to impossible. There are better textbooks. Balashov (likewhat...), for example ... Although they say that he is from the "Landavites" and his course is based on the Landyvshits, but Balashov "went" for me good enough ... The best of the whole course on my concepts: Field Theory. Well, the mechanics.
          Quote: Egor65G
          Like 4re thick volumes.

          More. I didn’t even discover their physics physics, Qu. electrodynamics and physical kinetics. I looked at the rest at least.
          1. +2
            3 January 2015 14: 48
            I didn’t get to the quanta laughing And for exams, graduation and entrance, on his books prepared.
            1. 11111mail.ru
              0
              4 January 2015 09: 16
              Quote: Egor65G
              And for exams, graduation and entrance, on his books prepared

              "Feynman, Lanton, Sands" is worse?
              1. 0
                4 January 2015 11: 29
                I have no idea. Landau's books were with his father in the library.
                1. 11111mail.ru
                  0
                  4 January 2015 16: 51
                  Richard Feynman (Feynman) Nobel laureate, author of the best textbook for universities "Feynman Lectures in Physics." Read his bio. I assure you, you will not regret it!
                  1. 0
                    4 January 2015 17: 29
                    Thanks for the tip, be sure to read hi
          2. Aladin
            0
            3 January 2015 15: 07
            Quote: retired
            Field theory.

            Somehow I took out a part of the library being written off from one factory - about the Gazelle - a lot of things, but the lamp is swinging in the tavern and it describes the field theory in principle more completely, although it is model.
            Landau and other wise men with an excess of mathematics are more likely barriers in understanding nature.
            1. -1
              3 January 2015 17: 16
              They are like a mafia. They created certain interconnected theories that have nothing to do with the nature of natural processes and make a fool of everyone. Can a quantum or fantastic particles fly at all in the space of what is not there? The essence of decaying dynamic processes is perceived as a postulate, but not as any of the particular options.
              1. +1
                3 January 2015 18: 34
                Quote: gridasov
                They are like a mafia. They created certain interconnected theories that have nothing to do with the nature of natural processes and make a fool of everyone.

                You would be Comrade Lysenko !!! Everything is clear there - proletarian science! ...
              2. Aladin
                +2
                4 January 2015 01: 23
                Quote: gridasov
                They are like a mafia

                Yes, it’s close - the first time I came across this when I observed the defense of one doctor’s by the unnecessary effect of 30 years ago - only 1 visitor objected, whose opinions were overcome, and the vocabulary of the scientific leader later in the hallway with his own did not differ from the brothers holding the market (x ... he is for ..... etc.).
                Another personal experience - an attempt at one of the mathematical departments to make a model of a real phenomenon (an explosion of a comet like Chelyabinsk) - showed everything that I could tell, brought books (on related topics and mathematics) - but there was no way out, only stories about differential equations .
                In the final result, there is a "club of very smart chess players" who judge science and do not allow strangers, milk the budget ... but there is no sense.
                In 2011 there was an article "Libya as Versailles"
                http://warfiles.ru/3073-liviya-kak-versal.html
                which describes the solution of scientific problems for the "scientists" troops
                In the late 40s, both Stalin and the Americans tried to get to the Reich bases, but it didn’t work out - they just lost ships - the difference in technology turned out to be very big. The Americans slowed down, and Stalin launched a rearmament program - not so much to win - it was immediately impossible, but to capture at least one base and equipment samples so that there was technical parity.
                Science was supposed to be done by paratroopers going one way from the sky and tank submarines only because he couldn’t even force the “Soviet intelligentsia” to think - arrogant creatures only copied the FAU-2 and built dachas, sometimes imprisoning their colleagues or pulling them out them from there as "necessary."
                But here the Zionists and Nazis came forward as a united front in order to prevent the development of Russia - Stalin was killed, and his programs were curtailed.

                The same thing is happening now - the paratroopers in front of the bunkers solve the equations, the submariners on the rubbish that the academics built for them ... the result is basically the same. But this knowledge is in nature and can be obtained at a desk or on the couch.
                That is, everyone who needs the result does without "scientists" - the government sends troops in the hope of getting a finished product, I have to use the effects on building structures and in nature to assess geophysical processes instead of a normal sensor system ... the principle of "do it yourself and run away" ".
                While the government is anti-people and cannibalistic politics, this situation is for the better - the militarists have fewer opportunities, but if power and politics change, then science should be different.
                1. 0
                  4 January 2015 10: 20
                  So I'll tell you that we have found a method that allows you to refuse in the analysis the process of summation -integrality -multiplication and differentiation-subtraction and division. AND!!! The analysis is carried out exclusively on the comparability of the basic parameters of numbers. Then it becomes possible to create systems of number series. Pure numerical algorithms In other words, the depth of infinity does not differ in its simplicity from simple comparison. But !!! algorithms allow creating directed and comparable "calculations" for all vectors of space and more to consider them in dynamics. Ultimately, one must see that the speed of analysis is carried out by the potential ability of the system itself, and not by mechanical actions, which are both energy-consuming and only one-directed. In fact, all this is already being used and embodied in a practical solution to a fundamental problem of a technical nature, which makes it possible to make a breakthrough in the energy sector, etc.
                2. 0
                  4 January 2015 10: 30
                  In addition, I can note that there are many artifacts and obvious phenomena that people brought up on stereotypes and postulates are unable and cannot see and are not able to analyze. Their brain is locked !!! This proves once again that inside mankind there are different, in fact, people. Not in the flesh, but in building the structural abilities of the analysis of those processes that occur around
                  1. Aladin
                    0
                    4 January 2015 15: 49
                    Quote: gridasov
                    inside humanity there are different, in fact, people

                    Yes, such studies were carried out - intellectually the difference is up to 40 times, and the possibility of understanding with a smart German or an Iranian, a black man is higher than with a standard fellow countryman - and this has always been the case - in ancient times, scientists moved from temple to temple around the world, learned from each other friend, and most of the population worked and fought, as now, with wild atrocities.
                    1. +1
                      4 January 2015 16: 07
                      A highly intelligent person can be distinguished by the test. Such people perceive and accept EVERYTHING !!! and they look for everything private and comparable justification. Primitive in consciousness people begin to prove their case. Therefore, I always focus on the fact that a scientist should be a deeply religious person. Believers are not in idols and cults, but in the MIND AND Rationality of everything that happens. REASONITY combines interconnectedness, and RATIONALITY - energy transformation of processes. And what is very important, you need to find a mathematical language that is equivalent to the processes of the world of our perception. Indeed, it is impossible to reflect the essence of the world of events in some abstractly invented language of analysis. They should be the same in shape.
                3. 0
                  4 January 2015 10: 49
                  At this stage, it can be stated that the knowledge we are talking about is similar to a flux, teal, volcano, cavitation collapse of water bubbles, which, in the essence of their process, sooner or later can go to a new fractal level. This is not a play on words, all these processes are identical in their mathematical laws. All this means that humanity is "hostage" to the natural sequence of our development, which we cannot avoid. Whether anyone wants it or not. All this is embedded in the algorithms of the method, which humanity is simply not able to think of so far. Because it is not even the process itself that is important, but the algorithm that determines any process is important.
  8. +3
    3 January 2015 14: 06
    He was not familiar with Landau, but he used his physics textbooks very intensively. Those. it’s not enough to know much yourself, you still need to be able and willing to share your knowledge with others. And Landau did it pretty well.
  9. -2
    3 January 2015 15: 33
    nASH DOROGOY aZERBAYDJANEC-tovarish Landau
    1. +3
      3 January 2015 17: 44
      Quote: vikingost
      nASH DOROGOY aZERBAYDJANEC-tovarish Landau

      "Our Dear aZERBAYDJANEC Comrade Landau" - so what is it for? Landau is an outstanding physicist, a scientist of whom our country can be proud. Why are these vyser in the Latin alphabet, you do not have enough Russian?
      1. 0
        3 January 2015 18: 11
        Quote: Bayonet
        Why are these highs in Latin

        Or maybe he does not have a Russian layout on the clave? what He is in Sweden ...
        1. +1
          3 January 2015 18: 38
          It's not about the clave, don't you understand ??? The people just decided to pin it - "our dear Azerbaijani".
        2. +1
          3 January 2015 23: 29
          Quote: retired
          Or maybe he does not have a Russian layout on the clave? He is in Sweden ...


          Let this goose use virtual as my sister in America
        3. The comment was deleted.
  10. +3
    3 January 2015 19: 54
    Amazing and unsurpassed scientist! I remember the legends about its theoretical minimum agitated the minds of my fellow students at MEPhI. Strange, but among theoretical physicists there are quite a few rather "strange" personalities. But over time, I realized that physics is not an indulgence from belonging to ordinary humanity. Among, for example, dentists, there are also quite a few eccentrics. Why, look at McCain. But - a senator! I apologize for comparing a genius to an idiot. This is just for illustration.
    And more about fun comparisons. Landau worked in Kharkov. So he left there and Kharkov could not resist the Bandera ... But this is somehow not funny.
  11. avv2
    0
    3 January 2015 20: 02
    I don't understand why Landau is considered a "Great" scientist.
    Plank, De Broglie, Schrödinger, Kapitsa - I understand.
    Landau, I don’t understand. What, besides eccentricity and the fact that he is a Jew, is he famous?
    An analogue of Pasternak in the science of quantum physics?
    1. +4
      3 January 2015 23: 11
      Quote: avv2
      What, besides eccentricity and the fact that he is a Jew, is he famous?


      Are you in all seriousness, dear?
      What is famous - about this article, read off-diagonal. For a deeper understanding, one would first need to get a higher technical education.
      As for nationality, then pay attention to the belonging to it of all the world-famous scientists listed in the article, and perhaps also mentioned in your comment. When God rewarded the nations, each one got his own, but the Jews were lucky, in my opinion, the most lucky, and since then UM is their calling card. Do you disagree?
      1. avv2
        +1
        4 January 2015 11: 17
        Quote: Buchki
        Are you in all seriousness, dear?

        Quite seriously. In the article, I read that:
        1. How many celebrities he knew;
        2. How many celebrities knew him;
        3. About bloody red;
        4. About women;

        Well, that is, the article is semi-scientific, as they say.
        I have not met a single mention of scientific work, pulling
        on the nobel.
        It turns out that Landau is "Great" only because he is "Great".
        It seems that they awarded him for the fact that he knew many and many
        knew him.

        Funny.
    2. +1
      4 January 2015 08: 55
      Unlike those listed, Landau was a generalist. Suffice it to say that there are no textbooks of the listed scientists at universities. But the course of theoretical physics of Landau is practically eternal (on our scales). In addition, Kapitsa on your list is an experimenter.
  12. avv2
    +2
    3 January 2015 20: 13
    Yes, and by the way ... the name of the Russian physicist Gamow is mentioned in the article!
    The one who was able to understand the meaning of DNA as a mechanism of heredity and the very one
    who was able to interpret the detected "relict radiation" as evidence of the "Big Bang"
    and by the way put forward this very theory.
    This kind of personality can be accepted as a Nobel laureate.

    And Landau received the Nobel Prize for theorizing superfluidity, first of all
    discoverer of this very superfluidity-Kapitsa.
    It’s not camilleph. Sorry.

    still, damn it, they gave out for the circus numbers of the snobel.
    Landau clown from science. IMHO, of course.
  13. +1
    3 January 2015 22: 59
    Thanks for posting. It’s so simple and warm about GREAT !!
  14. +2
    4 January 2015 00: 45
    In 1997, a copy of the letter was published in the Duel newspaper, which was sent on March 28, 1942 by a young professor Andrei Vladimirovich Frost to a member of the State Defense Committee V.M. Molotov, who was in charge of science in those years.
    Interestingly enough, we read the letter and article by Yu.I. Mukhina "Mafia of Science"

    http://www.ymuhin.ru/content/%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%84%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%83%D

    0% BA% D0% B8

    Do not forget:
    Story - Oligarchic Capitalism
    For 300% of the profit, the capitalist goes for any crime
  15. +2
    4 January 2015 01: 33
    Landau is undoubtedly a great scientist. And what rarely happens is at the same time a great promoter. Lundyvshits proof of this. And the fact that he could be mistaken is also a living person. With a mildly complex character.
  16. avv2
    0
    4 January 2015 11: 42
    There is a film with Tim Robbinson "IQ":
    "a romantic comedy about the mundane auto mechanic Ed Walters (Tim Robbins), who managed to fall in love with Catherine (Meg Ryan), the niece of Albert Einstein (Walter Mattau). True, Einstein is not at all against their romance, and even vice versa - he helps a fan to portray a physicist - intellectual "
    http://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/movie/hollywood/17304/annot/

    in this film it’s just shown that the main thing in Science sometimes happens when many people know you,
    and you know many.
    In my opinion very much like the hype around "Mozart from Science".
  17. 0
    5 January 2015 09: 58
    The theory of superfluidity, for which he later received the Nobel Prize, was formed with a one-year break. In April 1938, Lev Davidovich was arrested on trumped-up charges. At the Lubyanka, according to the physicist, "they tried to sew the authorship of some stupid leaflet, and this was with my kind of aversion to all scribble."

    And this is the whole Stalinist regime. Thank God not everyone was rotted in the Gulag. It’s sad that my great-grandfather and great-grandmother on my mother’s side did not escape this fate.