Weapons are prohibited. Part of 7. Blinding Laser Weapon

36
Today, the use of laser weapons can be both a sign of humanism and an act of cruelty, which is clearly spelled out in international law. In this case, one application is different from another is not so much. Today, laser weapons are understood to mean all types of weapons that use a laser beam as a means of destruction. Laser weapons are considered a promising type of weapon, experiments on the creation of combat laser systems are carried out in many countries around the world.

Ban

The ban is laser weapons, which is specially designed and has as its main combat mission (or one of the main tasks) irreversible blinding of enemy soldiers. At the same time, a side effect on the organs of vision of the enemy by laser systems, which are intended for solving other military tasks, including the disabling of enemy optical systems, is not subject to the prohibition. Also, the ban does not apply to devices that cause only temporary blindness of enemy soldiers.

The main prohibition document is “Protocol IV on blinding laser weapons (Supplementary Protocol) to the Convention on the Prohibition or Restriction of the Use of Specific Conventional Weapons that may be considered excessively injurious or have indiscriminate effects”, it entered into force on October 13 An additional protocol was signed in Vienna.

As of January 2012, this additional protocol on the prohibition of blinding laser weapons has been ratified by 114 states, including Russia.



Blinding lasers

One of the most prominent examples of non-lethal laser weapons are the so-called dazzler. If to simplify completely, this is a very powerful laser “flashlight”, which is designed to damage the organs of vision, as well as optical and infrared surveillance systems of the enemy. The development of such devices began in the late 1970-s. For the first time they were used by British troops during the war with Argentina for the Falkland Islands. Since 1995, the Dazzler, which hit the organs of vision, have been recognized as inhumane weapons, they have been banned on the basis of the relevant UN documents. At the same time, the ban did not affect in any way the devices designed to disable warheads, infrared cameras, optics, and so on. It is under such devices that manufacturers often mask full-fledged combat dazzlers.

To date, the most well-known model of a mobile blinding device can be called the American laser rifle-Dazzler PHASR, which was created by order of the US Department of Defense. In addition to the direct blinding effect, this rifle can inflict very serious burns on a person (even if they do not lead to fatal consequences), and from a considerable distance. The weapon is used for temporary blinding and disorientation of the enemy. Its prototype was the Dazzler laser weapon, which the British used to blind the Argentine pilots during the Falkland War.

Another example of modern dazzlers is the Chinese laser facility, known as the ZM-87. According to the official information of the Chinese manufacturer Norinco, before 2000, the entire 22 of such a set of combat lasers was assembled. After that, the production was curtailed due to protests from the international community and a ban on such types of weapons. At the same time, they tried to remove from the general circulation not only references to this weapon, but also its photographs. Although according to some data, the produced samples remained in service with the power units of the PRC.

PHASR rifle


The dimensions of this laser weapon do not allow to call it lightly mobile. The length of the laser setup 84 cm, weight - 35 kg. Most of all, an installation mounted on a tripod resembles a heavy machine gun. In addition, the kit also includes an external battery, which in its weight and overall dimensions is comparable to a car battery, which does not add mobility to the device.

The effectiveness and uniqueness of the Chinese military laser system due to the high lethality. So ZM-87 is able to completely deprive of view the personnel of the likely enemy at a distance of 3 kilometers, and with the use of a special lens - at a distance of kilometers to 5. From a distance of 10 kilometers, the laser is able to temporarily disable the enemy personnel, briefly blinding him and disorienting him. It is also reported that ZM-87 could quite successfully deal with the thermal and optical instruments of military equipment. For these purposes, the device uses a beam of power 15 mW. At the same time, when used, the beam is not emitted continuously, but pulsed - up to 5 flashes per second. Given the fact that the laser beam is always straightforward and not subject to ballistic and other types of deviations, it can be called indispensable for combating highly mobile targets, which include airplanes or helicopters.

As noted above, today in the world there is a ban on the creation of laser weapons, which is intended to be used exclusively or even to blind an enemy who does not use optical devices. But temporary blinding of the enemy is allowed and is a humane means of warfare. One of the applications of temporarily blinding lasers is the suppression of criminal acts that can be directed against police officers and special units who are solving their task of protecting and protecting the rule of law or when seizing offenders. The use of such weapons in self-defense provides a very low degree of risk to the health and life of the defender.

Today, blinding laser devices are called dazzler in the West. They were first used for military purposes in the Falklands War. At different times, such devices were installed on tanks, ships and combat aircraft, models were also developed to complement handguns and individual devices. Today, non-lethal lasers are manufactured in the USA, Great Britain, and China. In Russia, similar special equipment has been adopted by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, some are mass-produced, for example, the Potok product, created by the NPO Special Materials.

Weapons are prohibited. Part of 7. Blinding Laser Weapon


The action of such non-lethal lasers is based on the direction to the violator of the order of the laser beam of green or red colors, which can cause temporary blinding, as well as psychological impact on a person, leading to the fact that a person will lose the ability to carry out coordinated (conscious) actions. Due to this, the combat effectiveness of the violators of order is significantly reduced, preventing them from moving forward.

Also, bright light lasers, which are deployed in a line and scans the terrain, can create the effect of a light curtain that prevents enemy snipers from aimed fire, and in some cases can interfere with visual observation through optical devices. In accordance with the accepted IEC safety standards (International Electromechanical Commission), the power of temporarily blinding laser sources must be within two limits, where the upper limit limits the maximum exposure power that does not cause burns and irreversible effects of the eyes (2,5 mW / cm2), and the lower limit (power less than 1 mW / cm2) determines the power level that is sufficient to achieve a temporary blinding effect on the enemy.

In order to protect the retina from damage with low-power lasers at a short distance, such devices can be equipped with distance meters. Such meters will automatically reduce the radiation power or completely shut off the device. In addition, modern portable lasers can be used to send distress signals, warnings, and also as a means of exchanging information during reconnaissance operations. Due to the narrow radiation, they can be used at sufficiently large distances.

Information sources:
http://www.popmech.ru/technologies/13660-oruzhie-vne-zakona-10-zapreshchennykh-vooruzheniy/#full
http://www.shovkunenko-book.ru/arsenal/lazernaya-vintovka.html
http://techjurnal.info/voennye-texnologii/lazernoe-oruzhie-zapreshhennye-voennye-texnologii-budushhego.html
http://pravo.levonevsky.org/bazaby/mdogov/megd3709.htm
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    30 December 2014 07: 42
    The English development of the SMU1000 laser dazzler is effective up to a kilometer away from 1.
    1. ICT
      +1
      31 December 2014 05: 50
      there is a spear, and here are the shields
      1. 0
        1 January 2015 04: 46
        And I think, what is it amerovskie soldiers in dark glasses without exception? smile
        1. Kassandra
          +1
          3 January 2015 13: 37
          all the armies and for a long time ... even so that the tank range finder does not blinded forever.
          1. +1
            3 January 2015 20: 08
            The tank range finder works on other frequencies and is unlikely to be able to blind. They wear glasses to protect them from small fragments and clouds of sand and dust raised by the explosion of a mine or IED - in the sandy areas of the Middle East it is very important
            1. Kassandra
              0
              3 January 2015 22: 29
              they are also worn during maneuvers in Europe. precisely for protection against glare with tank rangefinders.
            2. Kassandra
              0
              3 January 2015 22: 30
              they are also worn during maneuvers in Europe. precisely for protection against glare with tank rangefinders.
  2. +1
    30 December 2014 08: 24
    )) and rocket easier leads to the owners of such a trunk)))
  3. +12
    30 December 2014 08: 39
    It was like this with me: on the evening autumn road I was blinded by a laser pointer from a distance of about 500 meters in the dark. The first 3-5 seconds did not see anything, at 5-7 the second saw the lights of the lanterns ahead, at the 10 second I saw the road. Another hour and a half was a feeling as if in someone else's glasses. These pointers should be regarded as edged weapons, sales and use should be under the control of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. hi
  4. 0
    30 December 2014 10: 49
    Quote: Nitarius
    )) and rocket easier leads to the owners of such a trunk)))

    But it is much harder to direct simpler weapons.
    Really useful battle shit. I can already imagine how in a combat situation one will have to manage with one eye in order to switch to the second in the case of blindness and remain at least with something. I see no other reasonably cheap way out of the situation.
  5. -3
    30 December 2014 11: 53
    Laser-maser - all this crap, useful against unarmed hamsters. Polarized glasses and all protection against glare, reflective coating, smoke, frequent change of position and position - protection against damaging effects. And the owner of the "Super-duper blaster" lights up his opa to be fried. For guidance, for range finders, scopes, the laser is the very thing, but as a means of destruction - a complete dull g ...
    1. +1
      30 December 2014 12: 59
      To break up the riots would be nice.
    2. arcturus
      0
      1 January 2015 06: 40
      Well, no one has canceled remote combat modules, which is unreal to get into
  6. +2
    30 December 2014 12: 22
    For the first time to blind the enemy, probably Archimedes tried again with mirror shields.
    As it is hard to believe that his main idea would be the burning of ships.)
  7. +4
    30 December 2014 13: 11
    Quote: Denimax
    For the first time to blind the enemy, probably Archimedes tried again with mirror shields.

    By the way, quite a normal interpretation of historical nonsense with ignition. Mirrors in those times, except for signaling, they were very expensive and did not roll on every corner. But the city was rich, and the region is quite sunny, could really use mirrors for blinding. And to dazzle someone specific, since all the mirrors were aimed at one ship.
  8. 0
    30 December 2014 13: 15
    on the Maidan lasers blinded
    1. 0
      8 January 2015 02: 04
      where are you from, comrade? hell, in our Ukraine, (By competition) Odessa, Kherson, Nikolaev, Ochakov, I do not think that people live there who will shoot at me! \
  9. 0
    30 December 2014 13: 46
    Quote: brn521
    Mirrors in those times, except for signaling, they were very expensive and did not roll on every corner. But the city was rich, and the region is quite sunny, could really use mirrors for blinding. And to dazzle someone specific, since all the mirrors were aimed at one ship.

    According to legend, polished bronze shields were mentioned.
    They could blind everyone in a row, obviously the effect of an attack on a blinded enemy could fall dramatically. And they could have burned out of anything, with the same incendiary projectiles for catapults, if the steering who were not yet seeing would put the ships together in one pile.)
    1. +1
      2 January 2015 06: 59
      Archimedes experiments conducted. With the help of metal mirrors. Just collected them on a special rack, and sent to the target, simulating a ship. Caught fire.
      1. +1
        3 January 2015 17: 51
        Smoke, more precisely. And it took about 20 minutes to "keep focus"
        Bullet in a trireme burning barrel with a mixture of sulfur and resin, where both faster and more efficiently.
        1. Kassandra
          +1
          3 January 2015 22: 04
          Archimedes began to smoke and catch fire almost immediately ...
          1. 0
            6 January 2015 19: 59
            Consequently, there was a barrel of tar and sulfur.
            For the sun 2300 years ago did not shine 10 times more intense :)
  10. +2
    30 December 2014 14: 23
    What kind of prohibition laser weapons are under? What nonsense. Combat laser systems exist in Russia and in the USA, but the large energy demand of these devices stops us from large-scale use. As for blinding with laser, I want to say what else on our old T-55 tanks have become to put quantum range finders that determine the distance to the target with the help of a laser beam and this very beam can literally burn the eyes, so that the Americans began to produce special glasses that protect the eyes from laser radiation.
    1. arcturus
      +1
      1 January 2015 06: 45
      the tank range finder knocks the crow ... a bike went around that if you point the range finder at the crow, it will drop dead .... I did not try, I don’t know, but the searchlights were used by the Iraqis during the storm in the desert
      By the way, the ATGM blinds itself, in the case of a duplicate start-up, or a parallel start-up, so it should be assumed that the resistance to laser pointers in modern vehicles is zero.
  11. +1
    30 December 2014 14: 43
    promising weapons of the near future. given only to highly developed countries.
    1. arcturus
      0
      1 January 2015 06: 47
      Well, as the Chinese at every corner advertise laser projectors with power up to 50 W !!!
  12. 0
    30 December 2014 17: 14
    The BMP-1PS had regular lasers for darkening optical devices and blinding the enemy's eyes. Back in 1980's.
    1. s1н7т
      0
      31 December 2014 17: 23
      The first time I hear BMP-1PS. But I saw cars based on the BMP-1, where lasers really were to darken the optics. The so-called platoon of sight was part of the anti-tank division of SMEs. For the first time I saw in 34 Simferopol MSD in 84 (on the experience), then - in Jena (GSVG), if the sclerosis does not lie, in 87. And then they were nowhere for some reason. However, then a lot of things were cut to the delight of our sworn friends.
  13. -2
    31 December 2014 01: 33
    Quote: Balu
    With me it was like this: on the evening autumn road I was blinded by a laser pointer from a distance of about 500 meters in

    Interestingly, but hardly plausible, unless of course you did not ride a bike without a helmet,
    and the "saboteur" from 500 meters just hit first in the left, and then in the right eye. Here's a sniper damn it. You are visibly with coherent light, rumored to be familiar.
    Any glass, especially triplex, which has several layers of refraction perfectly protects the eyes, especially since the glass of the car is not perpendicular to the radiation axis, otherwise the "shooter" must sit on a tree or at least on the 3-4th floor of the house, and all this should be located directly in motion auto. :) And it's funny to talk about a laser pointer. Do not forget about the lateral displacement of the car relative to the "saboteur", unless of course it is a suicide and was not standing in the way of the car a few meters away, plus trembling of hands.
    1. 0
      31 December 2014 13: 26
      But how then can pilots complain about blinding ???
  14. 0
    31 December 2014 06: 27
    Quote: Rubicon
    Quote: Balu
    With me it was like this: on the evening autumn road I was blinded by a laser pointer from a distance of about 500 meters in

    Interestingly, but hardly plausible, unless of course you did not ride a bike without a helmet,
    and the "saboteur" from 500 meters just hit first in the left, and then in the right eye. Here's a sniper damn it. You are visibly with coherent light, rumored to be familiar.
    Any glass, especially triplex, which has several layers of refraction perfectly protects the eyes, especially since the glass of the car is not perpendicular to the radiation axis, otherwise the "shooter" must sit on a tree or at least on the 3-4th floor of the house, and all this should be located directly in motion auto. :) And it's funny to talk about a laser pointer. Do not forget about the lateral displacement of the car relative to the "saboteur", unless of course it is a suicide and was not standing in the way of the car a few meters away, plus trembling of hands.


    It would be extremely interesting to read your version of how hooligans of civilian aircraft pilots are blinding from the ground.
    On which floor is the saboteur, hand shake, and more.
  15. 0
    31 December 2014 09: 29
    The ban on blinding weapons (in this context, laser) is very easy:
    The documentation states that the product is intended for blinding optical surveillance systems and that's it.
  16. +1
    31 December 2014 13: 18
    I imagine rebellious people blinded by lasers and stunned by sound glushiliki ... Hell! Unbearable torment and pain. If the military are already using active headphones, in the future, special laser-scan glasses, then ordinary leaders will hardly be equipped with them. In the end, you can use the system of electronic vision type guglochkov. The fighter looks not directly but through the optics of the camera. Even if the camera burns out is not scary. Polarization or dimming chameleon lenses. In extreme cases, the system liquid crystal dimming. For modern cameras are already being developed floods and diaphragms on liquid crystals.
  17. arcturus
    0
    1 January 2015 07: 04
    there was a "laser revolution", a recognized fact, but the fact that there is not a single LED searchlight in the troops, also fakht ... but it's not even about LEDs, but about the banal replacement of conventional incandescent lamps in "Lunas" with halogens.
    at one time used the device of the observation of the commander of the BMP ... further 50 meters can not see anything, even in alignment with the gunner searchlight ... in this embodiment, active night vision devices are easier to prohibit because their efficiency is negative, compared to the ability to detect themselves. ... so if there are prospects for active nightlights, then only on a modern backlight base.
    The laser is more promising just by the projection area ... I don’t know how much an ordinary searchlight lives in a modern battle, but the fact that a laser or LED will outlive it will be an order of magnitude.
  18. 0
    2 January 2015 17: 25
    We will be wearing glasses from Google. Stylish trendy youth. =) Google, LCC was sent to me, give the coordinates of that pepper.
  19. 0
    2 January 2015 19: 31
    Very informative. I have a question for you, experts. And as with modern BBM, you can use remote-controlled laser systems. To dazzle ATGM?
  20. +1
    3 January 2015 19: 26
    At one of the exhibitions of weapons showed our development. To put it simply, this installation detects optical means (binoculars, sights) "shoots" a laser beam and burns out the eyes of those who look through this device. It seems like it "didn't go" precisely because of the "non-humanity". I then remembered the first Chechen one. How much work did it cost to "neutralize" at least one such "observer" and how many losses were there.
    Just comparing here the corpse of your fighter - there is a burnt retina. Yes, I do not care .. for all humanity.
    1. +1
      3 January 2015 20: 13
      Quote: angel of hell
      To put it simply, this installation detects optical means (binoculars, sights) "shoots" a laser beam and burns out the eyes of those who look through this device.

      How does this installation respond to broken windows from high-rise windows in a war zone? It is unlikely that the refractive index of ordinary glass is very different from the refractive index of glass used in optics
      1. 0
        4 January 2015 06: 10
        What's the difference! Stands for itself in standby mode and "bullets" when it pleases. The main thing is not to fall under it.
        1. Kassandra
          0
          4 January 2015 10: 07
          they are sitting in their backs in such weather, watching TV from Assad’s speeches ...
        2. 0
          4 January 2015 17: 05
          And if the optics with a matte finish and poor reflectivity, then how?
          1. 0
            5 January 2015 05: 00
            And h / s like! The main thing is working. Of course it is better to ask the developers about how this thing works, but I'm afraid they will say little.
  21. 0
    7 January 2015 23: 43
    I finished a military school a long time ago, but I remember that the laser problem was discussed somewhere with 70-s. As far as I understand, the issue of beam distribution in fog and dispersions (airborne) is still not resolved. Further. The beam is narrowly directed, respectively accurate targeting is difficult with increasing distance to the target. 1 km is not a distance. In New Russia, such distances are covered with granite meters. And who will risk very, very expensive laser weapons in such situations? Yes, and remember the Berlin operation 1945 year. The famous Zhukovsky searchlights were very famously suppressed by German artillerymen. A sniper with 1 km can easily damage and disable the radiation source.
    1. Kassandra
      0
      8 January 2015 01: 19
      it's all been decided long ago ...
  22. 0
    8 January 2015 01: 19
    de ------ my
  23. daladin
    0
    9 January 2015 15: 26
    special safety glasses can stand up to this.
  24. Der grosse
    -2
    25 January 2015 20: 00
    It would be nice to use against ukrov gunners