Muammar Gaddafi will go down in history as an ambiguous politician

12


No matter how controversial the figure of Moammar Gaddafi, experts agree that more than forty years of his rule had a great influence on the development of the sub-Saharan region of Africa. Herman Cohen, the former US Undersecretary of State for Relations with Africa, says that Gaddafi has several positive achievements.

“He spent a lot of money supporting Nelson Mandela and the National African Congress and supported him in the difficult times of apartheid. Another positive point is that Libya has invested heavily in the development of African business: hotels, public transport, and the banking system, ”says former US Under-Secretary of State Herman Cohen.

However, Joel Hopkins University researcher Denel Server says that Gaddafi’s generous considerations have always been behind his own mercenary considerations.

“He really extended a helping hand to sub-Saharan Africa, however this hand held a pack of dollars for such autocrats like himself. It was not a goodwill gesture, he was trying to buy support, ”the political scientist states.

Gaddafi dreamed of building the United States of Africa, but these plans were not destined to come true.

“I don’t see much progress on the path to uniting Africa,” says Deel Server.

Professor of African Studies at Howard University, Suleiman Nyang, said that Gaddafi’s belief in the unification of Africa was sincere.


“He chose the path that Dubois, Garvey, Kwame Nkrumah and other leaders who advocated for the unification of Africa had taken in their time. On this issue, he was moving in the right direction, ”said Suleiman Nyang.

However, the scientist says, Gadhafi’s legacy will always remain ambiguous.

“On the one hand, supporters of the unification of Africa will argue that he spent more money on the needs of Africa than any leader of the Arab world, including Nasser. Some Africans will adore him for one reason or another, others will hate him, ”says Nyang.

Cohen says that Gaddafi will always be criticized for the role he played in a number of internal conflicts in Africa:

“Between the years of 1970 and 1986, he invested a lot of money in fueling revolutions. Yes, he financed Liberia's leader, Charles Taylor, and that war lasted seven years. ”

And on this list of sins Gaddafi does not end, adds Cohen:

“He sent troops to occupy Chad. As a result, his troops drove out the local rebels, led by Hissene Habré. He had an influence on the events in Burkina Faso. He contributed to the coming to power of Thomas Sankar, and then helped Compaore to get rid of Sankar. ”

Gaddafi was president of the African Union from 2009 to 2010, and was replaced as president of Malawi by Bingu Wa Mutharik. During the recent events in Libya, he lost the support of his old allies. Although many African leaders refrained from expressing their position, President of Senegal Abdoulaye Wade, during a visit to the Libyan opposition in Benghazi, called on Gaddafi to step down.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    12 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. mitrich
      -4
      3 September 2011 17: 40
      Muammar Gaddafi is the prime example of the proverb "what you sow, you reap." Overthrew King Idris with his comrades in 1969 (quite a decent uncle, by the way), he was in power for 40 years, rushing from socialism to "social" capitalism, finally settling on "Arab socialism" (Jamahiriya). What it is and what it is eaten with is not clear. I have no doubt that I climbed into the state pocket together with my entire large family (these are the innocent joys of all Arab rulers, there are no exceptions).
      I would be glad to be mistaken, but for some reason I don’t believe that this is Allende or Saddam Hussein's edge. An inner feeling suggests that after the fall of Sirte, its next "home port" is Algeria or Zimbabwe. By the way, the Gaddafi family has already been sent to Algeria.
      It’s hard, of course, to lose power ... So many hands were reaching out to scratch the heel, and suddenly "being persecuted by everyone."
    2. mitrich
      -1
      4 September 2011 10: 32
      Well, duck, write how you see this wonderful person, since my opinion is "not in the subject" ...
      1. +2
        4 September 2011 11: 37
        Quote: mitrich
        Well duck write how you see

        The next port of registry is most likely South Africa. By the way, only the vice president of South Africa Kgalema Motlante called to sue the Hague court for NATO for crimes committed against the Libyan people. Nelson Mandela at one time received a lot of money from Gaddafi and was a friend. In South Africa recognized the transitional council and did not block Libyan accounts.
        Quote: mitrich
        That I climbed into the state pocket with my entire large family - I have no doubt

        I think it’s unlikely. He was practically the only manager, he was practically a shah and he didn’t have to climb the whole country. For 6 million people, the income from oil production amounted to $ 40 billion a year.
        But at the expense of the government. This is perhaps the almost standard procedure in Asia, the overthrow of its predecessor. And its government is practically no different from the dictatorship.
        Only one thing confuses me in this story. Where did so many indignant people take? Indeed, 800 Euro unemployment benefits in Africa are just huge money. Education is paid by the state in any country in the world! Medicine is one of the most equipped.
      2. LESHA pancake
        +1
        4 September 2011 20: 25
        BUT AN EXAMPLE TO THE OTHER DICTATORS DOESN'T LIKE THE WEST TO BE PREPARED FOR DEMOCRATIZATION AND THE HAGUE TRIBUNAL WOULD LIKE YOUR COUNTRY OF MONTHS 6 NOTHING SCARY DEMOCRACY.
    3. mitrich
      +1
      4 September 2011 12: 22
      APASUS,
      your last paragraph can be easily explained. There, in Libya, clan and tribal relations are extremely developed, for example, the most powerful of the "rebel" clans has up to 140 thousand bayonets. The main item of Libyan income is oil, which is extracted in the east of the country. The eastern clans, of course, did not like very much that the oil fields were located on "their" territory, and money was flowing to the west of the country. Gaddafi himself comes from Sirte, geographically located in the west of Libya. That "blazed" in the eastern part of Libya, not without the help of "interested" persons in the European West and the Arab East.
      Second. You yourself have actually confirmed my assumption that the Libyan regime is corrupt. Such rulers, as a rule, do not distinguish between the state pocket and the personal one, so they consider it not superfluous to “pinch off” a couple of billion dollars from the country's 40 oil revenue. And the presence of accounts of the colonel's family in Western banks has long been a secret of the Punchinelles.
      I was more surprised by the very capture of Tripoli by the "rebels". If they were advancing, which was not, then how they passed by the same city of Sirte, because this settlement is on the way from Benghazi to Tripoli, and all the DBs in North Africa since Rommel's time are conducted along this route, and not in the desert itself. In my opinion, there was no smell of "rebels" during the capture of the capital of Libya, the city was taken by parts of the SN of the coalition countries with the participation of Arab mercenaries. They got tired of marking time, so they risked a ground operation. However, Paris and London already do not hide this feel .
      1. +1
        4 September 2011 12: 57
        Quote: mitrich
        There, in Libya, clan and tribal relations are extremely developed, for example, the most powerful of the "rebel" clans has up to 140 thousand bayonets.

        Forgive the mitrich, but have you been to Egypt? If not, then I'll tell you a little. In Cairo itself, food riots broke out almost every year. Therefore, when the buses pass, they ask to shut the windows and even in the first seats there are usually a couple of soldiers with machine guns. Here is heated from outside. " the revolution "in Egypt does not surprise me at all.
        But the dissemination of information via Twitter and other social services. network in Libya says that not poor and illiterate people went out onto the street. People with higher education came out. Here somehow Tuaregi does not fit with computers on camels. That's the question.
      2. LESHA pancake
        0
        4 September 2011 20: 26
        WELL MITRICH THIS IS NOT NEW.
    4. mitrich
      +3
      4 September 2011 13: 13
      APASUS,
      It happened. Cairo saw.
      So after all, the population of Libya is richer than the Egyptian at times. The Egyptians generally erratic goal for the most part.
    5. Eric
      0
      4 September 2011 21: 03
      He has not gone far yet, and certainly he is not history, but his name is already a priori inscribed there!
    6. 0
      4 September 2011 21: 23
      It will be interesting to die, how does the hero escape and where will they take them?
      1. baluru72
        -1
        22 October 2011 09: 56
        Here’s the answer --- died as a martyr hero,
    7. bishopXhc
      0
      20 March 2014 16: 51
      He still looks like your Vladimir Volfovich
    8. +15
      9 March 2018 14: 10
      Not only Gaddafi banged, but money has already stolen everything

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"