New contract on the transit of Russian gas through Belarus

55
The gas giant Gazprom has signed a new contract for the transit of Russian natural gas through the territory of Belarus with a subsidiary of the Belarusian company Gazprom transgaz Belarus. Duration of contract: 2015-2017 years. Reports about it RIA News.

New contract on the transit of Russian gas through Belarus


Despite the lack of information on how much gas will be pumped through the Belarusian section of the pipe, it can be said that such volumes will clearly be increased in comparison with the current year. The reason for this conclusion can be considered the statements of the first deputy chairman of the government of Belarus, Vladimir Semashko.

Vladimir Semashko said earlier that gas transit through Belarus could be increased by 9 billion cubic meters per year without any problems. Now the volume of gas pumping is about 44 billion cubic meters per year. This is slightly lower than the volume of pumping of the 2013 of the year, since the transit of gas destined for certain regions of Ukraine was reduced in 2014 through the territory of the Republic of Belarus.

The Russian company Gazprom is currently the full owner of the Belarusian gas transmission system, owning an 100% stake in Gazprom Transgaz Belarus, formerly Beltransgaz. In this case, we can say that when signing a contract, special difficulties could hardly have arisen ...
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    55 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +4
      17 December 2014 12: 37
      If the situation allows, then why not take this opportunity.
      1. +9
        17 December 2014 12: 43
        If the dill were the same sane people as the Belarusians - there was no need to build different "streams" and they themselves could have a healthy profit.
        1. +30
          17 December 2014 13: 05
          Hehe! laughing Is it a joke ... what

          On 27 on July 2014, US Secretary of State John Kerry handed over to the US Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov the ultimatum of the USA: In case of disagreement with American conditions in Ukraine, we are 1. Lower the oil from $ 100 to $ 60 and kill the source of income for your budget 2. We will raise the ruble / dollar exchange rate from 30 to 45 and lower the standard of living of Russians 3. Drop the RTS index from 1500 to 900 and destroy your stock market.

          On 9 on August 2014, Russian Foreign Minister A. Lavrov conveyed US Secretary of State George Kerry Russia's response: In this case, we are 1. Lower the oil from $ 60 to $ 40 and kill your shale oil and alternative energy projects. 2. We will raise the ruble / dollar exchange rate from 45 to 60 and make our enterprises even more profitable and competitive in foreign markets; 3. We lower the RTS index from 900 to 600 and redeem the shares of our enterprises from Western investment funds at a low price.
          1. +3
            17 December 2014 13: 12
            The Americans still do not understand who they contacted, we can’t measure us with a common arshin,
            For any bolt we have a special nut with a fiery greetings from Russia!
          2. +4
            17 December 2014 13: 40
            Right thoughts! It will be so! To all doubters - Happy New Year! Saw, Shura, they are gold (bucks, euros)! laughing
          3. +3
            17 December 2014 14: 00
            Quote: Sid.74
            Hehe! Is it a joke ...

            Every joke has some truth. This is certainly good for the government, but the second side of the coin is a drop in real wages. I wouldn’t care, but I’m worried about buying an apartment .... I don’t want to take pictures forever.
          4. The comment was deleted.
          5. +1
            17 December 2014 15: 57
            I am also on vacation ... But more than a liter - never !!!
          6. +1
            17 December 2014 16: 55
            But this is true !!!!
        2. +5
          17 December 2014 13: 07
          Quote: enot73
          If the dill were the same sane people as the Belarusians - there was no need to build different "streams" and they themselves could have a healthy profit.

          "Dill" and "sane people", even in one sentence, is somehow not logical! They live in their own pink world!
      2. -1
        17 December 2014 13: 00
        No matter how the old man asked the Kuril Islands for this.
        1. MSL
          0
          17 December 2014 13: 47
          I apologize for "-" wanted "+". Laughed heartily.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      3. pg4
        +6
        17 December 2014 13: 18
        And it’s good for us, and it’s beneficial for you, and Europe is calmer.
        1. +2
          17 December 2014 13: 45
          We pump less gas through Ukraine, and more through Belarus, it will be more profitable for us.
      4. +1
        17 December 2014 17: 08
        Belarusians sensibly reasoned that cheap gas is much more profitable than the operation and modernization of their gas transportation system. Just a business, without politics and other heresies.
    2. +2
      17 December 2014 12: 40
      "Russian gas through Belarus"
      He is it! And, I think what are these "brothers" fussing about ?! That's it, guys, the train left and the rails were dismantled ...
      1. +3
        17 December 2014 12: 43
        Who do you mean "brothers"?
        1. 0
          17 December 2014 13: 20
          Bulgarians lathered themselves in Moscow. To discuss South Stream ...
    3. 0
      17 December 2014 12: 41
      In this political situation, this is probably the only way to prevent the EU from freezing. what
      1. +7
        17 December 2014 12: 50
        And why should Russia care about THIS - "not to let the EU freeze"?
        Another thing is to let Belarus "steer" the gas valve, and not only Turkey, this, I think, is GOOD!
        1. +3
          17 December 2014 13: 08
          ia-ai00 .... Another thing is to let Belarus "steer" the gas valve, ...

          You do not seem to have mastered the whole article. It says that Gazprom is 100%
          the owner of the gas transportation system in Belarus. The old man was removed from the valve, he rested for a very long time, but surrendered when the fried rooster approached his point.
          1. 0
            17 December 2014 13: 22
            No, just 100%, somehow "slipped" by. Well, well, Belarus will get something for transit, which is better than that money would have settled in Ukraine.
            1. 0
              17 December 2014 14: 02
              ia-ai00 .... Well, well, Belarus will get something for the transit, and this is better than this money would settle in Ukraine.

              What transit, pipe Gazprom. Here for renting land for the pipe, maybe?
              It depends on how the contract is drawn up.
              1. 0
                17 December 2014 17: 01
                Do you represent the "pipe"? It is a complex and is served by people with good salaries.
        2. pg4
          +2
          17 December 2014 13: 25
          When the "Nord Stream" was laying screams, too, there were enough, but then the democratic selection of gas from the higher Ukrainian authorities began and everyone immediately approved the construction of the gas pipeline.
        3. -5
          17 December 2014 13: 30
          Because, apart from selling GAS and OIL (weapons do not count for monkeys), we can offer nothing to Europe or to anyone else
          1. MSL
            +3
            17 December 2014 13: 50
            You are not lost, my dear?
            1. pg4
              +1
              17 December 2014 15: 03
              It is not regrettable, but he is right
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. 0
            17 December 2014 17: 07
            Yes, you forgot to say that Russia is the second grain exporter in the world. By the way, proposed by China, this is almost everything we have stolen. Even if in the USA it was rushing.
      2. +4
        17 December 2014 12: 53
        Is it worth worrying about the EU? In general, it is necessary to sell gas and oil at its border, and let the buyer work with transit.
        Assets must be kept, otherwise blackmail can never be avoided.
        1. +2
          17 December 2014 13: 00
          Quote: mch1950
          And in general, we need to sell gas and oil at our border, and let the buyer work with transit

          This is the 3-th energy package, but Gazprom does not like it.
          1. 0
            17 December 2014 13: 12
            Quote: atalef
            This is the 3-th energy package, but Gazprom does not like it.

            I wonder why this is not like it, most likely due to the fact that in this package there is a condition that one cannot use the pipe exclusively
            1. +1
              17 December 2014 14: 19
              Quote: saag
              Quote: atalef
              This is the 3-th energy package, but Gazprom does not like it.

              I wonder why this is not like it, most likely due to the fact that in this package there is a condition that one cannot use the pipe exclusively

              Very simple. One manufacturer, he is also the owner of the transport system - he "drank" the dough, he produces it alone, well, with hangers-on. The final recipient pays a certain amount, Gazprom provides gas cheaper than competitors who have separate gas, the main gas pipeline is separate, the distribution network is also separate. Both the consumer and Gazprom are satisfied. If you sell gas at the border, intermediaries appear and you need to "cut" the loot for at least two people (and most likely there will be even more willing). The price for the end user rises, Gazprom's profits go down, competitiveness also goes down (hence, there will be less sales). Plus, there is a dependence on any kind of husk.
          2. +1
            17 December 2014 13: 42
            The Europeans themselves are building the third package, but in relation to Turkey, or do you think the Turks will build it, as Gazprom does?
            Gazprom builds and has the right to own, and let Israel apply the third package to Pindo.
          3. 0
            17 December 2014 13: 48
            Here you are wrong Gazprom does not like it here that I will give an example simple for you. You bought a truck for the delivery of your goods and here the collective farmer says to you You can carry your goods on your truck, provided that you give half of the space to your competitor and not the fact that he will use this right and you will drive your truck with 50 % loading.
            Yes, here's another hello from the euro collective farmers
            The European Union Court has ruled to exclude the Palestinian Islamic movement Hamas from the list of terrorist organizations.
        2. The comment was deleted.
    4. +6
      17 December 2014 12: 43
      I still don’t understand why with such transit volumes and such low gas prices our country's economy is in full out ????? recourse
      1. Jem_Psak
        +6
        17 December 2014 13: 02
        Well, there are many reasons, one of the main ones is capitalism in the Russian Federation, the second time the state is convinced for Russia the only acceptable form of government is absolute Monarchy or Authoritarianism, the third is the excessive presence of librarians + and democrats in the state bodies of the Russian Federation, and another reason is weak anti-corruption policy state.
        P.S. My personal opinion =)
        1. +1
          17 December 2014 13: 13
          Quote: Jem_Psak
          for Russia, the only acceptable form of government is the absolute Monarchy

          I would say this is intermediate, then Aurora comes out of the dock and you can shoot from the tank gun :-)
      2. +2
        17 December 2014 13: 18
        Quote: Belarus
        I still don’t understand why with such transit volumes and such low gas prices our country's economy is in full out ????? recourse

        Because our factories release products to the warehouse, in Russia Belarusian goods are cheaper than ours, ice palaces are being built to the detriment of everything, all sorts of "holy things of Dazhynki" are held with world championships in hockey.
        And where is the Belarusian flag to the right of my nickname 0255?
      3. +1
        17 December 2014 13: 18
        Quote: Belarus
        I still don’t understand why, with such volumes of transit and such low gas prices, our country's economy is in full outflow ?????

        In Belarus, 55% of enterprises are unprofitable.
        55% of enterprises in January-August 2014 were unprofitable or low efficient, according to official statistics.
        It is reported by BelaPAN.
        So, in January – August, 1.399 organizations received a loss. A low level of profitability (up to 5%) was recorded in 3.031 enterprises. Thus, almost 55% of enterprises accounted for by official statistics were unprofitable in January-August or were among low-efficient ones.
        Compared to the same period of 2013, the share of unprofitable organizations increased significantly. So, in January – August 2014, 17,3% of organizations considered by official statistics were unprofitable. For comparison: in January – August 2013 the share of unprofitable organizations in Belarus amounted to 12,5%.
        Well now guess at the expense of what the unprofitable enterprises contain.http://bdg.by/news/economics/31181.html
        1. pg4
          0
          17 December 2014 13: 31
          And because of the fall of the ruble, unprofitable pr-y became even more.
          It cannot go on forever.
    5. +8
      17 December 2014 12: 48
      as I understand it, transit money is floating away from Ukraine, hi, egg.
    6. +2
      17 December 2014 12: 51
      Quote: Belarus
      I still don’t understand why, with such volumes of transit and such low gas prices, our country's economy is in full outflow ?????

      I support 100%. Caucasians are crushing us from all sides, and we are at reduced prices .. I would like to hear the opinion of knowledgeable members of the forum what is it? Grand politician - if so, with whom and against whom? If the preservation of the gas sales market, then again - who can capture it so sharply? And after an incomprehensible tail beating to Lukashenko regarding Russia and his pro-Western statements, is it worth it to conclude such contracts.
      1. +1
        17 December 2014 12: 57
        I do not understand why such a volume of hydrocarbon exports in general. Sell ​​for "green" ones then buy pin_dos bonds for them or give out loans to everyone? What's the point ?
    7. +4
      17 December 2014 12: 56
      Gazprom’s normal relations with its Belarusian daughter: mother and Belarusian daughter do not quarrel, and trouble with the Ukrainian stepson is just ... and he is also in trouble.
    8. Zubrminsk
      +3
      17 December 2014 13: 02
      In time, the Old Man was tilted and you have no problems, but with Ukraine, the moment was profound. Fat, which lasted for years, filled the eyes of Russian bureaucrats. In Ukraine it was necessary not only to pour in, but also to pump out, not loot, so other interests.
    9. -1
      17 December 2014 13: 04
      Unclear. If a full owner, then why a contract? Or is dad and daughter in a special relationship?
    10. Zubrminsk
      +2
      17 December 2014 13: 05
      Quote: juborg
      No matter how the old man asked the Kuril Islands for this.

      Rather, the Kaliningrad region))))))))))) (joke)
      1. +1
        17 December 2014 13: 14
        Quote: ZubrMinsk
        Rather, the Kaliningrad region))))))))))) (joke)

        "jokes are jokes, but there can be children" (C)
    11. 0
      17 December 2014 13: 06
      well, at least somewhere, at least somehow, at least a little normal ...
    12. act
      act
      0
      17 December 2014 13: 07
      The olives have been trained. Just in case.
    13. +2
      17 December 2014 13: 08
      Quote: atalef
      This is the 3-th energy package, but Gazprom does not like it.


      And why should Gazprom like it. Build a pipeline at your own expense, and then give it to your uncle. And if this "uncle" is also insane, then ...
    14. 0
      17 December 2014 13: 09
      As far as I know, the increase in transit through Belarus was artificially slowed down by the Poles. There is the bulk. More precisely, the largest volume of Belarusian transit again then falls to Ukraine in the Kobrin district on Kovel. To Lithuania - there it is, bullshit: 2 seven hundred (720 mm.), It seems ... I can, however, be mistaken ... what And again: in order to significantly increase volumes it is necessary to lay new pipes. But this is for sure Yes. Those. we must somehow agree with the Poles ...
    15. 0
      17 December 2014 13: 10
      Now, I don’t understand - what kind of positioning are the dads!?, Let's decide - are you ours, or against us!? ....
      1. 0
        17 December 2014 13: 48
        dad, well, definitely never was.
    16. 0
      17 December 2014 13: 20
      And yet we need to look for ways for new gas pipelines .. Hope for = FATHER = in the light of his recent statements about Russia is very illusive, After all, Lukashenko is essentially Europe’s last dictator .... and the end of his reign is just around the corner ... and although = Old Man = everywhere hints that Belarusians are crazy about him = scrap off = he can, like twice two, and not our supporters can come to replace him, so that the path to Turkey is faithful, the path to Asia is faithful, that's just there is a problem with India, but nothing will have to be done with liquefied gas ...... In short, I personally have little joy in signing a new contract with Belarus: the next successful working moment of contact with a neighboring country, which is fraternal today, and may not become tomorrow her ..........
    17. 0
      17 December 2014 13: 26
      Quote: mig31
      Now, I don’t understand - what kind of positioning are the dads!?, Let's decide - are you ours, or against us!? ....

      he is trying to maintain neutrality, apparently afraid of the Maidan
    18. 0
      17 December 2014 13: 55
      Here, AT ALL, there are people who are able to answer, for which they put a minus? And then MINUS DELIVERED, but they did not write their answer. This is not very correct in my opinion.
      There is a feeling that a handful of Ur patriots have gathered and minus everyone who has their own opinion on this article, which does not coincide with the opinion of MOST.
    19. +1
      17 December 2014 14: 04
      Zamususuyut previous statement. But did you know that the milk that OUR government wanted to provide for our country is purchased in China, Kyrgyzstan and the most interesting in New Zealand, for which the state duty is reduced by 30%?
      And all the milk is bought up by large corporations that sit in Moscow (Danon, Vimbildan, etc., the owners of which are foreign businessmen).
    20. 0
      17 December 2014 14: 06
      - "Against those who are against us,
      Only those who are against those who are against us-
      Can't cope with them, without us .... "
      V. Tsoi
    21. +1
      17 December 2014 14: 32
      It is necessary to sell at its border on an advance payment and for rubles. And that’s it.
    22. +1
      17 December 2014 14: 49
      Old Man the other day said that we need to look for other markets besides the Russian one (wherever interesting he would find them, when he himself is under sanctions). Then Semashko declares that gas transit can be increased. This is not even a hint of Russia, this is a concrete statement.
    23. +1
      17 December 2014 15: 34
      In the meantime
      EU member states will need to contribute to meet Kiev’s request for 2 billion euros, as the European Union is not able to do this, said the head of the European Commission (EC), Jean-Claude Juncker. laughing
    24. +1
      17 December 2014 16: 04
      Quote: Belopolsky
      Quote: Sid.74
      Hehe! Is it a joke ...

      Every joke has some truth. This is certainly good for the government, but the second side of the coin is a drop in real wages. I wouldn’t care, but I’m worried about buying an apartment .... I don’t want to take pictures forever.

      During this period, buying apartments should be very cautious.
      The people, I myself from Russia 8 years ago moved to Belarus. Citizenship of the Russian Federation. So with the experience of living here I explain, and this is important:
      2010 seemed to have a similar financial situation - the dollar pulled up 3 (!) Times. From 3000 to 8500 - 9000 white The reasons for the massive buying up of the dollar by the population. They themselves are to blame. But I'm not talking about that. Loan rates rushed up. Apartments before this were built at 10-12%. In some cases, they began to reach 40-50% (!) Six months later (attention!). I found a loan calculator on the sites, looked at how much you have to pay per month for the hut for at least 32%. The situation turned out to be complete n ... c. We take a loan for 20 years - we repay the first 2 years, we feed the bank the remaining 18 years. Repayment of the loan per month was obtained in the 40000 area of ​​Russian rubles (I considered my hut) with a salary of 20000. Not bad? BUT: I managed to jump into the last car and cry now about 500 grew. Those. the situation with the appreciation of the dollar has played into the hands of a huge number of Belarusians. But only to those who managed to take a loan to a sharp increase and to the final, maximum increase.
      I personally know 2 people, one pays for a hut 100 grew. p, he took a loan for 2-3 years before the crisis, another paid up to 5 years before (loan term was 20 years) and then he took and paid the balances for 15 years at once, paying (tratatatata !!!!!) 7000 grew. rubles!
      But there are also a small number of Belarusians who, in the hope of further depreciation of the whites. the ruble took loans under 24, 32 and even 40 with more than interest. Whoever took 30 or more, I think (I don’t know for sure) in the ocher ... m flight. How they get out - I do not know. Salaries for the last 3 years not only did not increase, but fell slightly.
      If everything goes as it should, like here, then Russia expects a small, not catastrophic drop in living standards, in six months or a year it will stabilize more or less, salaries will rise, the dollar will continue to grow slowly upward. Well, x ... with him. The main thing is not to freak out, do not buy any x .... yo (here the people then rushed to buy everything that is possible (they took 10 refrigerators, why ???), further exacerbating the situation.
      Break through!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"