Choice of Russia

21
Choice of RussiaDecember 4 we will go (or not go) to choose. Many will say an event to me too, anyway they will count without us. I think that is not entirely true. “Correctly count” can be done with 15-20% difference in real votes, but not with a break in 50% of the total number of voters. There is no doubt that the voice of everyone who did not come to the polling station will be recorded in the EP. And so I really want our choice to be deliberate. I want to express my thoughts not for those participants in the discussion who stupidly say: “Stalin was an executioner, and there was no sausage under Brezhnev,” but they cannot bring a single argument in favor of preserving the current government. (I will make a reservation that I have an ambivalent attitude towards both leaders of that era). I write for those people whose convictions are similar to mine, but for some reason they see Putin as the head of our state.

Немного stories. Let's be honest, in the eyes of the 70 generation, security officers were people with clean hands, etc. But, after all, they were human beings, and among them there were also Licking, thieves and traitors. Somehow very well intertwined fate. A prominent fighter for democracy Sobchak with a modest colonel from the above department. The results of their joint activities in the second capital are generally known. The second went up sharply, and the first was tried to be held accountable even in those years when the theft of state property was considered more of a virtue than a disadvantage. And if such a notebook "Democrat", like Salye, through clenched teeth speaks of plundering food, one can imagine what it has become. And for a short period of time a modest colonel stood at the head of a still huge country. He was noted in this gap only by one achievement, when, together with another well-known “fighter for the truth,” known by the people as “Stepashka the Fireman”, persuaded the Prosecutor General to resign. The point is not in retirement, but in the fate of the General Prosecutor's Office at this moment, for some reason, she became interested in the “mischief” of the members of the “family” of the Constitution Guarantor. However, it is worth recalling that during the indicated period of time he for one and a half years headed the native department, for which the “complete“ surprise ”was the arrival of the“ cheerful Chechen guys ”to the territory of Dagestan, and which received money just to ensure that this did not take place .

I am far from thinking that Vladimir Vladimirovich drank tea with Maskhadov and Basaev, but without doing anything, one can also achieve a certain result. And so it turns out that “certain shortcomings” in the work of the department headed contributed to the growth of authority. When we quite rightly started to freak out gangsters, many credulous citizens (and I, including those who believed) - Russia rises from its knees. However, subsequent events personally convinced me: “A change in posture is by no means an indicator of the perpetrator's awareness of his unseemly behavior. The bandits as a result of obscure amnesties flowed smoothly into the leadership, and successfully maintained at the expense of the rest of the country. I dare to assure you, in Chechnya, the 100% vote for Putin and the EP is close to the truth. Dagestan blazes, kill every day. Kabardino-Balkaria and Ingushetia join him. Their position is clear. Why Chechnya can live on freebies, but we do not. There are no sense to list other well-known facts from the increase in the number of billionaires and beggars to the innovative road to Skolkovo, which has collapsed over the year. As for achievements, there is such a section in the EP program, read a lot of funny things. Paraphrasing Mayakovsky, one can say: “Putin and the party, twin brothers” - and further in the text. Considering the above, consider whether these brothers should give their vote, and you need to give it to someone, based on what I said above.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    2 September 2011 09: 18
    I fully agree with the author of the article. There are a lot of Russian citizens who are dissatisfied with the results of the reign of our not-so-beloved tandem, at least this is enough to ensure that the EP won no more than 50% in the elections to the State Duma. Given the existing monopoly of United Russia, for Putin this would be tantamount to defeat, even if the Communist Party did not get more votes than United Russia.
    This will force Putin and the EP led by him to reckon with the opinions and positions of other parties, and therefore with each of us.
    The author of the article 100% is right, the vote of the person who did not come to the polls in the State Duma will be directly or indirectly recorded in favor of EP. Everyone who does not agree with the tandem board can really prevent this, by personal participation in the vote.
  2. +4
    2 September 2011 09: 35
    Thank you for the article. I completely agree with every word.
  3. +1
    2 September 2011 09: 49
    Putin is trying to rule Russia as his estate. He is trying to become a kind of private owner of the country, to rule everything and not to answer for anything. After all, the people in the highest posts should hold the answer to the people. President, deputies of the State Duma. According to our Constitution, the chairman of the government is not a powerful person at all. The main burden of responsibility lies, it turns out, on Medvedev. And the basic decisions are still made by Putin.

    The only thing Putin needs is popular support. Any charismatic leader requires popular trust for some great project. Be it industrialization or war with neighbors. Therefore, all the great dictators and strong democratic presidents of the 20 century had clear programs. The voter understood very well who he voted for, choosing Roosevelt or de Gaulle. And party bonuses knew what Stalin's position was, supporting him at his party congresses. (author Svyatenkov Pavel).

    Who knows the ultimate goal of Putit?
  4. 0
    2 September 2011 10: 20
    Quote: stas
    Who knows the ultimate goal of Putit?


    Kill ... But I would answer with a quote ... Here:
    Quote: stas
    Putin is trying to rule Russia as his estate. He is trying to become a kind of private owner of the country, to rule everything and not to answer for anything.


    But, what is permitted to Jupiter (Stalin) is unlikely to burn out in the bull.

    And the article is very, very. Especially the ending. I repent, I thought so myself. Thank.
  5. 916-th
    +5
    2 September 2011 12: 06
    Putin is indeed a very opaque leader (opaque is a tribute to political correctness, a more appropriate definition is muddy). No vision, no mission, no ultimate goal, no program. But there are many elements of a political show designed for the average layman - starting from flying on fighter jets at the beginning of a career, demonstrative martial arts, skiing, hanging out with bikers, etc.

    At first, I too was tormented by doubts about who he was - one among strangerswho alone opposes the oligarchs, corruption and the West, or a stranger among herskillfully mimicking himself as a fighter for the interests of the country and the people?

    You can debate a lot, but it is better to do this based on obvious facts. I'll start the list, those who wish can continue:

    1. Before coming to power, Sobchak was the right hand in St. Petersburg scams.

    2. Brought to power by Yeltsin, who named him his successor. EBN would not entrust his business and his "family" to an unverified and unreliable person.

    3. GDP was planted at the head of the Ministry of Defense by Serdyukov, also a native of St. Petersburg with a dubious past.

    4. Serdyukov begins reforms in the Army (similar in meaning to Gorbachev's perestroika) and receives the right to dispose of trillions of dollars in the framework of state defense orders. State defense orders from year to year are not fulfilled, but the money is successfully "mastered" after several cycles of scrolling.

    5. Recently, attempts have been made to promote and promote Mikhail Prokhorov, a billionaire, friend and colleague of oligarch O. Deripaska. A number of articles have appeared in the media in which O. Deripaska speaks of Putin as a henchman of the EBN family and the “junior partner” of a number of Russian oligarchs.

    Please continue the list.
    1. 0
      2 September 2011 12: 35
      6, Putin wants to rule Russia for another 12 years, provided "if the EP in the upcoming elections gets more than 50% of the vote."
      Who agrees ? Then you really don’t need to vote in the elections, his team will “correctly” count your votes for you.
      1. +5
        2 September 2011 13: 47
        7. He brought to power Medvedev. (I think Medvedev’s rule is a minus)
        8. Canceled the election of governors, now all of them are his proteges.
        9. He gave an education to Fursenko, who successfully ruins him.
    2. +3
      2 September 2011 15: 08
      10. Sly - Putin’s wise personnel policy. During his reign since 2000 of the year, not a single bright and worthy government official, even his successor Medvedev, appeared in the highest echelons of power in Russia, Putin picked himself up smaller than God forbid, someone dared to outshine his star in the political Olympus of Russia.
      11. Putin essentially destroyed political competition between the parties, created a dominant position only for his EdReno-louse, which is hard to call a party. Some kind of gangway, according to the principle "who wants to live beautifully at the expense of the people - to me."
      12. All telecasts of the central channels that could in any way criticize him ceased to exist. So far, only Soloviev V.
    3. zczczc
      0
      3 September 2011 20: 16
      916-th, it is quite transparent. Imagine that there is no so-called "liberal opposition". And look at Putin and the Communist Party. Everything is transparent.
  6. 0
    2 September 2011 13: 13
    I will not add new items, but I would add them to existing ones:

    Quote: 916
    4. Serdyukov begins reforms in the Army (similar in meaning to Gorbachev's perestroika) and receives the right to dispose of trillions of dollars in the framework of state defense orders. State defense orders from year to year are not fulfilled, but the money is successfully "mastered" after several cycles of scrolling.


    Plus, the “Observer of the Observer” is appointed on the initiative of the LADY.

    Quote: stas
    6, Putin wants to rule Russia for another 12 years, provided "if the EP in the upcoming elections gets more than 50% of the vote."
    Who agrees ? Then you really don’t need to vote in the elections, his team will “correctly” count your votes for you.


    Why 12 years old? Why not for life? Why was Medvedev introduced, who is simply nothing like a politician? The principle "today I am, tomorrow you". tweaks will change each other according to the "will of the people" (at the last municipal elections I looked at this chaos a lot) until someone dies.

    Quote: 916
    A number of articles have appeared in the media in which O. Deripaska speaks of Putin as a henchman of the EBN family and the “junior partner” of a number of Russian oligarchs.


    By the way, this may well be a provocation. Not a single person in their right mind (and I’m calm for Deripaska’s mental health) will not say that. It's not me that Putin is a henchman of the ebna family, but for what Deripaska said. So then everything is clear with Putin.
    1. +3
      2 September 2011 13: 41
      When Putin ends the next 12-year term, he will be 73 years old. So, it turns out that he wants to determine a life term for himself.
  7. 0
    2 September 2011 13: 55
    Who knows where the money went from a charity concert held in the 10 Ice Palace last December with the participation of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and world cinema stars in support of children with cancer?
    Has this story ended in nothing?
    1. -1
      2 September 2011 14: 13
      Oh come on you for such a penny ... The right thing, the little things. Compared to other things.
  8. -1
    2 September 2011 13: 56
    So what? You do not remember this Chernenko? And Brezhnev wasn’t a boy anymore ... A tradition for this country ... Nikita and Gorbi were removed, yes, well, enlightenment happened at ebna ... And the rest were from the study to the Krmelev wall.
  9. 916-th
    +2
    2 September 2011 14: 22
    Banshee:
    Quote: "Not a single person in their right mind (and I am calm about Deripaska's mental health) would say that."

    In the commentary to the article "Project for the utilization of Russia" I gave a link http://www.lebed.com/2006/art4522.htm., Which describes Deripaska's cunning trick called "Counter Fire Wall". I recommend reading it, it explains a lot.
    1. 0
      2 September 2011 14: 50
      Thank you, read it. Indeed, much has cleared up.
  10. +1
    2 September 2011 17: 58
    Yes, on December 4, everyone should think about whether to stay at home and not go to the polls. I believe that whoever remains is not with the people. Our faithful democrat Sobchak seems to have joined the Communist Party only a year before the events. Then he ostentatiously tore the party card while playing in public. Putin did not tear the party card in public, but became the Leader, party leader, as it is written on the posters. Putin is the party leader. The truth is not indicated by any. Indeed, he is not a member of any party. Insanity in full. EdRo, ideologically inspired by Putin, has passed hundreds of laws that are far from popular aspirations. All officials were forced to join EdRo. And why Putin does not join? He clearly wants to be clean after EdRo is thrown off the pedestal. Putin wants and is pricked. But, if he is not a stupid person, then he obviously will not go to the polls, because the party will never gain the desired 50 in fair elections. They are pushing forward Prokhorov. Currently, his slogans are quite socially oriented. But remember about the 60-hour work week and other bells and whistles of his statements. Did you change your views? I doubt it. And I advise everyone to also doubt. Vote not for Putin, Prokhorov and others like them, but to come to the polls and express a clear protest with your participation and rejection of the front-line soldiers with an integrated party.
  11. Volkhov
    -1
    2 September 2011 19: 08
    Imagine that our "elite" - the crew of the "Titanic" and how do you think they will do - will they give the boats to women and children, remaining on the bridge, or will they dump quietly, forgetting about the passengers of the lower classes?
    Whatever you choose in that environment, you will not find them at a difficult moment, and you won’t be left with boats, so don’t waste time on other people's games, build a society from below, choose your helmsmen, create reserves, build rafts, and then state.
    1. -3
      4 September 2011 09: 36
      Possible translation:

      1. We (the authorities) don't give a damn about you.
      2. We will not do anything for you.
      3. Start spending time and effort, stand society from the bottom up, choose the helmsmen, create reserves (that is, engage in garbage, we will not give you anything) and so on.
      4. In the meantime, with burning eyes, you will implement all this,
      WE ARE MORE ... ELEVENTY YEARS HAVE BEEN SORGED OIL AND GAS, CREATING RESERVES FOR ITS GREATNESSES, WE WILL BUY ANOTHER FOUR QUARTERS OF EUROPE AND APPOINT TO YOU NEW STEERING !!!

      However ... dear Volkhov, maybe I didn’t understand what?
      Maybe you are not calling for it?
      1. Volkhov
        +1
        5 September 2011 18: 49
        Take, as an example, the situation at the surrender of Sevastopol - the leadership flew by 15 Li-2, and 100 soldiers and officers remained. They stood on Cape Chersonese, waiting for the ships ... Those who in their collectives went through the front, with a local organization or on their own, got out.
        The evacuation of the "elite" is already underway, this is a big process, it cannot be stopped. We are passengers on an airplane with a jumped crew, we need to quickly learn to fly, but we are offering a beauty contest among flight attendants.
        Of course, the pilots are jumping for a reason, the reason is serious, but we have nowhere to go - just move the rudders. Stalin's slogan - "to be in time in 10 years, or we will be crushed" - we have only a year, and the problems are more serious.
  12. +1
    2 September 2011 20: 54
    There is no idea where and how Russia will move on. There are no concrete cases. As we sat on oil and gas, we continue to sit. Some kind of stupid and moronic reforms, no control. And all this and a lot of other things that you can’t list are ours today's power and life.
  13. Owl
    0
    3 September 2011 20: 09
    People from nowhere - lead the country to nowhere. A citizen of the State must come to the polls (State Duma, President) and vote honestly, it is necessary not to give the opportunity to throw left, pre-registered ballot papers into ballot boxes.
    1. -1
      4 September 2011 09: 20
      This is the duty of everyone and there is nothing to be ostriches, but now on the asphalt. Everyone goes and votes who are closer to you in spirit. But everyone should think and analyze. Although here everything can be. You vote for the Just Russia Communist, and you look - he has already gone over to EdRo. There is no guarantee, unfortunately.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"