Alexander Lukashenko reacts to the “thunderstorm” from the West

79
Alexander Lukashenko reacts to the “thunderstorm” from the West In the conditions when the world is being shaken by the “Arab revolutions”, the war is going on in Libya, the threat of war in Syria has appeared, Alexander Lukashenko has proposed to give the CSTO additional powers. And just a year ago, the President of the Republic of Belarus (RB) categorically refused to participate in the joint work of the CSTO collective rapid reaction forces. Apparently, the reason is really serious, since Lukashenko surrendered to the position of the irreconcilable advocate of the sovereign rights of the Republic of Belarus.

Alexander Lukashenko really surprised, during a meeting with the Secretary General of the Collective Security Treaty Organization Nikolai Bordyuzha, the Belarusian President stated the need to change the format of the collective rapid reaction force (CRRF): “This is not only about the application of the CRRF in case of interference from other countries, but in the case of intervention by other states within the CSTO countries ... Of course, no one will go to war with us, but many people are itching to make a constitutional coup ”.

Apparently, the Belarusian leader took into account the situation in Libya, where the “neocolonialists”, applied a new type of operation to demolish the legitimate regime. With the help of “rebels”, who in the eyes of the world media are turned into heroic rebels fighting the “bloody regime”. It is clear that the same scheme can be used in the demolition of any regime in Central Asia, in the South Caucasus, Lukashenka himself is “popular” with the Western media, and Putin’s part of the Western public considers the agent “bloody gebni”, which revives “Mordor” - Russia.

According to the President of the Republic of Belarus, he discussed the topic of using the CORF in order to prevent revolutions in the CSTO states with the President of the Russian Federation D. Medvedev during his visit to Sochi. True, it is unlikely that Lukashenko could agree with Medvedev on this topic. Currently, the participation of the CRRF in internal political conflicts is not provided for by the statute. And many of the countries included in the CSTO, the condition for their entry into the organization, put this item. Although after Libya, perhaps someone will reconsider their views. For the first time about such a change, Lukashenko hinted, even after the coup in Kyrgyzstan, when they overthrew Bakiyev.

In principle, Lukashenka is right, the pro-Western forces have recently intensified greatly, both in Belarus and in Russia. Therefore, it is not necessary to wait until the West finishes Gaddafi, decides everything in North Africa, really hits Syria. One can be sure that the process of “democratization” and “modernization” will also affect the post-Soviet space. In all the republics there are the same problems as in the Arab countries: high unemployment, dissatisfaction with the authorities, national and religious conflicts. There are separatists, there is a pro-Western liberal opposition, radical Islamists, etc. It’s impossible to wait until the situation is out of control and a “revolution” comes, you need to take countermeasures.

Lukashenko’s proposal could be an important step in integrating the former republics of the Soviet Union. For real historical step. This would create a barrier to the aggressive plans of the West. According to the head of the Republic of Belarus, “military bases of foreign states in the CSTO member countries” must be deployed “with the consent of the Council of the CSTO Heads of State”. “The organization must be holistic and united,” the president of Belarus rightly noted. In fact, hinting at the inadmissibility of the double game waged by some members of the military-strategic alliance (for example, such as Kyrgyzstan). A number of countries continue to play their multi-vector games, in effect letting the “Trojan horses” of the North Atlantic Alliance into the CSTO territory in the form of US and Alliance military bases. It is difficult to disagree with the President of Belarus that this would indeed be a real “breakthrough in the activities of the CSTO if we implement all these measures.”

On the part of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, there has not yet been a reaction to the proposal of Minsk to jointly control the deployment of foreign military bases in the former Soviet Union. However, given the vicious inclination of our Central Asian "partners" to the most "flexible" foreign policy tacking and playing "multi-vector", it is easy to assume that it will take a long time to wait for a positive response, and if it does, it will be negative.

Therefore, Alexander Grigorievich, calculating such behavior of Central Asian "friends", suggested mercilessly cutting off "diseased organs" that impede new integration. At the same meeting with CSTO Secretary General Nikolai Bordyuzha, Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko called for the exclusion of the Republic of Uzbekistan from the Collective Security Treaty Organization. According to him, “if someone does not want to work and perform the statutory functions, then he must leave the organization and not interfere with the work of others.” Thus, the Belarusian president strongly urged to stop political correcting with the saboteurs of the integration processes.

According to the President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems Leonid Ivashov, a similar mechanism a group of experts (which included it) was developed in 1992 year. This was necessary so that “on the most important international problems we would stand together.” But then this offer was rejected. At the same time, the question was raised about “internal insurrections and collective reaction” to them. And he was not supported - the proposal was rejected by the Foreign Ministry, headed by Kozyrev.

And the experience of using the CSTO forces in internal conflicts was. In the same Republic of Tajikistan, when, in fact, there was a real civil war. They helped to protect the border, and "participated in the opposition to local Wahhabis." Such forces could intervene in the events in Kyrgyzstan during the Osh massacre. According to the president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, “The Libyan scenario in the post-Soviet space is not a myth, but a real threat.”

Reference. Collective rapid reaction force (CRRF). These are joint military forces of the CSTO member states. It is believed that the CRRF is in a state of constant combat readiness to deal with emergency situations (ES), as well as foreign military aggression, terrorist activities, organized crime and drug trafficking. The composition of the CSOR: the Russian Federation, the Republic of Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan. The agreement on the creation of the RRF was signed on February 4 of the year 2009. It is planned that the military base of the Collective Rapid Reaction Forces should consist of units and units of permanent combat readiness. They must be capable of mobile transfer to any point in the area of ​​responsibility of the Collective Security Treaty Organization. It is planned that the KSOR will also receive special forces in its membership, and they will be formed from internal affairs agencies or the police, units of internal troops, state security organs and special services, as well as emergency prevention and response agencies. The basis of the KSOR are subdivisions of the Russian Federation, Kazakhstan and the Republic of Belarus. From Russia - this is the 98-I Guards Airborne Division (in the Ivanovo Region), the 31-I Guards Airborne Assault Brigade (in the Ulyanovsk Region). Kazakhstan - 37-I airborne assault brigade (Taldykorgan), a battalion of marines. Belarus - special forces brigade. According to the 1 battalion from Armenia, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. You can also enter the Ministry of Emergency Situations and the special forces of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. They are located in permanent places of dislocation. They are subordinate only to their national commands, and if necessary, coordination should take place at the CSTO level. At the end of 2009, the KSOR forces conducted large-scale exercises near the Kazakh-Chinese border, at the military range Matybulak.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    79 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. LESHA pancake
      +15
      1 September 2011 07: 44
      In any case, RUSSIA must be prepared for the Libyan scenario. Certainly in Brussels and Washington similar plans are being prepared in relation to RUSSIA.
      1. Igor Vladimirovich
        +7
        1 September 2011 11: 03
        When there is no agreement in the comrades, their case does not go smoothly (words from Krylov’s fable). And the countries of the former USSR will be split up, while it will allow and try to reduce the economic and geopolitical component to the provincial level. There is strength in faith and unity, but the format does not matter.
        1. nickname bj
          0
          2 September 2011 22: 25
          "When there is no agreement among the comrades, their business will not go well" ...
        2. Marat
          0
          5 September 2011 22: 39
          Well said, Igor Vladimirovich!
      2. dmitri077
        0
        28 January 2012 12: 54
        "In any case, RUSSIA also needs to be ready for the Libyan scenario. For sure, Brussels and Washington are preparing similar plans with respect to RUSSIA." - how exactly will the "Libyan" scenario be expressed in Russia? and how should you be prepared?
    2. ZEBRASH
      +3
      1 September 2011 07: 59
      I agree, LESHA damn it. They have been dreaming about this for a long time. Our people have always rallied and united against the external enemy, but the struggle against the internal is always bloody and useless
    3. bells
      +10
      1 September 2011 08: 06
      I think such scenarios of "democratizers" have long been ready for all countries that are not developing to please the United States. The CRRF should (if they agree) to cover the borders and airspace in these cases, as well as exclude the intervention of the "friendly" NATO bloc, provide space reconnaissance, etc. Daddy fellow - looking into the future.
      1. -6
        1 September 2011 10: 27
        What is the problem? Let us also undermine the system inside NATO and the USA. Only I'm afraid nothing will work out. Where fair elections are held, there will be no rebels. Democracy damn it!
        1. petor41
          +8
          1 September 2011 14: 37
          Even the United States can be rocked! They have many contradictions within the country on which they can play, enmity between whites and blacks or between south and north. An obstacle can only be strong US special services, or simply no one needs it now!
          1. -12
            1 September 2011 16: 18
            enmity between white and black

            They even have a black president. Where to next?
            South and North? Well this is generally funny. You have never been there.
            The only thing that interests them is work. As long as she is, no one can shake them.
            1. Superduck
              -1
              1 September 2011 23: 43
              In vain do you minus him, they are only interested in loot and not politics, or rather that part of politics as for the dough. Do not judge them from the words zadornov.
            2. -4
              2 September 2011 02: 08
              And you're not just not very smart
        2. Dovmont
          +3
          1 September 2011 21: 11
          Sorry! Do not understand! This is where you saw fair elections? IN USA?
          1. -7
            1 September 2011 22: 18
            There, at least 2 parties really aspire to power and to the last it is not clear who will rule the country.
            The mayor of New York is chosen by the inhabitants of the city. How did it happen in St. Petersburg today? And in Moscow?
            Want to guess with 3 times who will be the president of Russia? Can you do the same trick with the US president?
            1. 0
              6 September 2011 16: 58
              -There at least 2 parties really claim power ...

              And as a maximum too. And for 200 years in a row. Only the first two (or three) were independent presidents, the rest were only on the party list from the Demoblikan (aka Republican) party.
        3. +1
          2 September 2011 02: 08
          Is it in the USA that is fair elections? Do not tell, what did he study at Harvard?
          1. -5
            2 September 2011 08: 48
            And specifically there is something to say? Any examples? Or one chatter?
        4. dmitri077
          0
          28 January 2012 12: 57
          “Let NATO and the US also undermine the system from within.” - +10 points! lol undermine Britain, Norway, Austria, the Netherlands, etc. from the inside ... pearl of the day! Bravo
      2. dmitri077
        0
        28 January 2012 12: 55
        "Dear fellow - looking into the future." - "But father" has NO future! lol how hard it is to understand ...
    4. Max. M.M
      -9
      1 September 2011 08: 16
      if the United States, NATO, the EU are planning something bad against Russia, then there will be a nuclear war!
      1. +3
        1 September 2011 08: 37
        I think their gut is thin for a vigorous war. They will try to undermine us from the inside!
      2. panzersoldat
        -1
        1 September 2011 15: 04
        I think that both the EU and NATO will be afraid, even in the Russian army and not the best of times, but to wipe half of Europe off the face of the earth.
      3. Dovmont
        +3
        1 September 2011 21: 16
        Are you sure that saving their skins and loot the Kremlin lads will not surrender Russia? Bastards like Gorbachev, Eltsin, Kozyrev, Chubais, Chernomyrdin at our tops even a dime a dozen!
        1. -1
          2 September 2011 02: 09
          Chernomyrdin would not be included in this list ...
    5. +9
      1 September 2011 08: 59
      Undermining the inside is much more profitable. And for the money and everything else. And then in the event of a conflict, someone in the Strategic Missile Forces can not listen to our weak-willed and throw boots on the remote ....
    6. Owl
      +1
      1 September 2011 09: 23
      Amers always try to "work" with maximum cost savings, as for Russia - "only Russians can defeat Russia", the enemies have been doing all this since 1985.
      1. ballian
        -12
        1 September 2011 10: 24
        Where do you see "enemies" here in Russia? Like who is against Putin (Gadafi, Lukashenko, Obama, Merkel .... ... and so on) - the "enemy"?
        1. LESHA pancake
          +7
          1 September 2011 10: 36
          And then everything is simple, at first people like NEMTSOV or KASPAROV and NOVODVORSK create an OPPOSITION GOVERNMENT somewhere in the village of Gadyukino they organize a couple of provocations, preferably with human casualties, then they start yelling to the whole world about the dictatorship in RUSSIA.
          1. ballian
            0
            1 September 2011 10: 55
            You fantasize, and very much - these characters are unable to consolidate people around themselves and raise them to revolt in Libya or Syria, and Nemtsov certainly is not a revolutionary.
            In Russia there are more or less power elections.,
            If anyone can throw off this power with popular unrest, then nationalists and leftists - so probably most readers of this site will be only satisfied.
            1. +3
              1 September 2011 16: 29
              I personally heard how Novodvorskaya wanted Russia to be bombed a little, then the brains of the people will be replaced. And this lady will do anything for the purposes of the West.
              1. ballian
                -3
                1 September 2011 20: 02
                I’m a direct dick - this Novodvorskaya was given to you - a direct giant of thought and democracy.
                1. -1
                  1 September 2011 21: 18
                  Such a woman is hard to forget.
          2. Dovmont
            +1
            1 September 2011 21: 22
            The trash listed by you is only capable of yapping, although they are capable of minor provocations. Only. For serious matters, they are linking.
    7. raf
      +1
      1 September 2011 10: 22
      That thunder from heaven had already fallen, and for someone it smelled of fried! Oh, dad! There would be no honest friends! Now you have to fear!
      1. panzersoldat
        -2
        1 September 2011 15: 08
        You would be silent. Belarusians are not such people as to bite each other. If you think that he is afraid of the Libyan option, then you are mistaken
        1. raf
          0
          1 September 2011 20: 28
          What fright would I be silent with? I didn’t say a bad word about Belarus! And Lukashenko is afraid of losing power, as in any other ruler!
          1. panzersoldat
            -3
            4 September 2011 15: 35
            It does not seem to me that the Libyan option is possible in Russia or Belarus, but somehow I don’t want to be honest with Russia, it has too much shit. At first, they buzz that we are brothers, and then gas prices are higher than for Germany. I believe that it is high time to put all the points over the And -or we are friends and there are no price increases and accusations of parasitism, or we are just partners and we live by market relations, but then no talk of fraternity.
            As I understand it.
            1. raf
              +2
              5 September 2011 09: 53
              And honestly, it’s not very easy to be friends with Belarus. Lukashenko either cuddles, then suddenly turns around and climbs to cuddle with Europe. And they break his code there, again to us! How can I be friends here! I also think that it is time to put all the points above and. And as for the gas price, I think this: if we create a union state, then the price should be approximately the same throughout its territory (taking into account transportation). As I understand it, none of us is against friendship! Yes, something up there doesn’t agree!
              1. panzersoldat
                -3
                5 September 2011 16: 47
                And why in this world must be under Russia or under the United States. Can't you stay independent? Is it necessary to be a province of Russia or to be in the EU. America is trying to crush the whole world, Russia is trying to gather around itself at least a former union, but sometimes without asking. I am generally for integration, but on an equal footing. Somehow I don’t really want to be a servitor, especially not with a very good king.
                1. mitrich
                  -1
                  5 September 2011 16: 56
                  panzersoldat,
                  And you yourself, forming your own business and registering an LLC, having invested, say, 30 million rubles in the authorized capital, will you take a co-founder of a former classmate with 100 thousand? Or you’ll say: to hell with him, but at school we drank beer together, what abacus between friends!
                  1. panzersoldat
                    -5
                    5 September 2011 21: 05
                    I’ll take it. But we will immediately discuss with him who we are friends or business partners, otherwise Medvedev too often changes both his attitude to Belarus and its status. It is a pity that both Lukashenko and Medvedev do not yet fully understand the meaning of our integration. Better to be friends now.
                    1. mitrich
                      +1
                      5 September 2011 21: 12
                      panzersoldat,
                      and if you extrapolate your neutral response to Russian-Belarusian relations smile ?
                      1. panzersoldat
                        -3
                        5 September 2011 21: 23
                        Well, extrapolate, i.e., a lieutenant.
                        1. mitrich
                          -2
                          5 September 2011 21: 51
                          panzersoldat,
                          Then consider your business to be ashes smile . They love the strong and smart, dear tanker, not the weak and stupid. Good luck with your business. wink !
                        2. panzersoldat
                          -4
                          5 September 2011 22: 02
                          It seems that you do not belong to the section of the strong and smart. If a person runs out of arguments, he will resort to insults. You lost and are afraid to admit it.
                          Although I agree, the businessman is none of me. I thought that I was talking with an adult adequate person. Apparently I was wrong.
                        3. mitrich
                          -2
                          5 September 2011 22: 11
                          panzersoldat,
                          Yes, drop it! I personally didn’t even mean you. If it’s absolutely GENERAL - do you really think that both fraternal economies (Russia and Belarus) can unite on an equal footing? After all, Belarus’s GDP is 3% of Russia's. That's what I meant.
                          And in general, you, it seems, just don’t know much.
                          What is, for example, a gas shit with Ukraine about now? The Ukrainians agree to merge Naftogaz with Gazprom, but 50% to 50%. This is ridiculous, since the capitalization of Naftogaz is ten times less than that of Gazprom. Do you understand now?
                        4. panzersoldat
                          -4
                          5 September 2011 23: 20
                          You yourself have answered all the questions. It turns out that Belarus can be either an appendage of Russia, or we will again "show off" (according to Russia) and hinder our "mutually beneficial" cooperation. But somehow I don’t want to be an autonomous region within Russia.
                        5. mitrich
                          -2
                          5 September 2011 23: 35
                          panzersoldat,
                          And what do you want? Should we not give a shit about formalities with you? Well, you are not Lukashenko and not the famous Kolya to worry about this.
                          I stop the discussion (discussion - exchange of views), remain at your convictions. It is not clear that everyone is so dreaming of a unification? According to you, this is 97% to 3% should join request ...
                        6. panzersoldat
                          -3
                          6 September 2011 16: 27
                          Yes, I'm not Kolya, I'm Dima. Just someday Russia will finally rake in the remnants of Belarusian enterprises and Belarus will finally become an economic (if not territorial) appendage of Russia. Only if this happens now, everything that Russia inherited from this "Anschluss" will stretch into its pockets. And if Lukashenka puts off this moment for five years, maybe Russia will change by that time.
                          If I'm wrong, write. And good luck in business.
                        7. mitrich
                          -2
                          6 September 2011 16: 36
                          panzersoldat,
                          I live in the Sverdlovsk region, which is a territorial and economic "appendage" of Russia, and I do not worry about it at all.
                          And also, a colleague. If you reflect the opinion of the overwhelming part of the fraternal republic, then there is nothing to fence the garden - even in the comments on this article. Let everyone then go their own way. It will not decrease from us, but whether Belarus will be happy in this case is another question ...
                          And also, especially for you (maybe they don't talk about this in Belarus anymore). At one time, in 1999, Mr. Lukashenko was a great guardian of the Union State, but only when the EBN chose not him as his successor, he began to "distance himself" from Russia. Thus, he proved that personal power for him is higher than public benefit. This is the true truth, tanker.
                        8. panzersoldat
                          -2
                          6 September 2011 16: 53
                          I never heard that EBN could choose him as a successor. By the way, I live in the Mogilev region, which is an appendage of Belarus and do not regret that it is not in Russia.
                        9. mitrich
                          -2
                          6 September 2011 16: 56
                          panzersoldat,
                          I am not disposed to joke on such serious topics.
                        10. panzersoldat
                          -1
                          6 September 2011 17: 01
                          I do not trust questionable information.
                        11. MichaelVl
                          -2
                          28 September 2011 11: 33
                          I wonder who mitrich in dialogue with panzersoldat pointed out so many minuses ??

                          Mitrich argues absolutely correctly - in life you have to pay for everything (money, interests) and ALL neighbors are / are not friends (whether on the scale of individuals, and especially on the scale of the state), purely based on some kind of their own interests. There is no "pink" delusional friendship, built on naked chants about fraternal peoples and sweet love between peoples (albeit fraternal), no matter how sad it would be, but this is a fact, the law of life, so to speak :) This is what the situation is developing between the former republics of the USSR - each leads his own policy, proceeding from his own interests! But for some reason, it turns out that everyone around is white and fluffy, and Russia is nasty, aggressive, mean, not fulfilling its obligations, and much more. etc. It doesn't work that way. All the fuss and fuss with grievances is just the emotions of the offended weaker subjects.

                          So it turns out that the minuses were instructed (meaning, they did not support) the person (Mitrich), who simply spoke about pragmatism directly and explained that Russia is the strongest of the "SSSR fragments." All minus players are concerned about fraternal relations on some kind of "equal" rights, but no one understands how to build, unite, organize such relations. All smart and know about everything, but THEY (in power) do not know and do not understand fucking thing, they do everything through the ass. These are the guys who are busy with folk chants: "brotherly relations", "union" ... And on the basis of something - they somehow keep silent, or are childish and babbling.

                          The USSR was built by Russia, and over the years of its existence, it pushed everyone who was part of the team far ahead in development! All these "fragments" were outraged and now they are screaming that they have also been offended and are still offended by bloodthirsty Russia. Take off your rose-colored glasses, screamers, and realize that nothing in life just happens. Those who are with us, those good fellows, we will be friends and work together, and everything will be fine with us! And who is yelling about insults - forward to the West or to China, or somewhere else - let's see how you all get undressed there, partners :)

                          And I add in conclusion - I am FOR Russia, Belarus, Ukraine and Kazakhstan as one! I hope that our rulers will succeed in finding such threads that will bind us firmly and for a long time! And such strings are gradually found, examples of TS, CSTO.
                      2. panzersoldat
                        0
                        5 September 2011 21: 28
                        Excuse me but what is extrapolated?
                        1. mitrich
                          -2
                          5 September 2011 21: 34
                          Is that humor? Do not show your uncle on the adult site and aunt your weaknesses.
                          I’ll try differently: to associate, to transfer one situation to another. Do you understand?
                        2. panzersoldat
                          -2
                          5 September 2011 21: 40
                          Moved, and what do I see? But I see that everything will remain so. We will be friends until the first minor quarrel.
                      3. panzersoldat
                        0
                        5 September 2011 21: 34
                        I don’t want to sound illiterate, but I would venture to ask you, as a senior in rank, what does "extrapo ..." mean.
                2. MichaelVl
                  -3
                  28 September 2011 11: 57
                  Panzersoldat,
                  In the USSR, too, were all the republics "servants" in Russia?
                  Have you forgotten (or maybe you didn’t know at all) that the USSR was organized by Russia? :) And what impetus did she give to all the republics in development, often at her own expense?
                  Be independent, who's stopping you along with your Lukashenko?!? But it doesn’t work for you and your dad to be completely independent (as indeed for everyone in this world), the only question is that someone is experiencing an inferiority complex on this subject, and someone perceives this as a nature and lives normally , benefits and enjoys life! ;)
    8. -1
      1 September 2011 10: 30
      Quote: ballian
      Where do you see "enemies" here in Russia? Like who is against Putin (Gadafi, Lukashenko, Obama, Merkel .... ... and so on) - the "enemy"?


      No, well, not worth all the eggs in one basket! Eco you all mixed ...
    9. Crazyzy
      +3
      1 September 2011 10: 53
      Of course, "Old Man" is right! Powers should be expanded as quickly as possible against the backdrop of aggressive NATO and Japanese policies in the Far East. If we add to this the impudent attack of the EU "Declaration of the European Union on the occasion of the European Day of Remembrance for the Victims of Totalitarian Regimes" with a "trial" over Russia for their own crimes on the territory of the USSR. Libya is too serious a “bell” to ignore it. ”NATO has become too aggressive and arrogant to behave, and you cannot get off with tales about“ democracy ”.
      And also the North-West region, the Far North, the Arctic is a very attractive "Piece" for Europe, there are many energy resources, moreover, open and unused and "cut off this piece" (when Russia is dismembered). will be one of the primary tasks. American companies are already working there with our Lukoil and Rosneft. So, that "Backlog" is already there.
    10. +3
      1 September 2011 11: 04
      “The Libyan scenario in the post-Soviet space is not a myth, but a real threat” - No one doubts this. No wonder this issue was worked out 20 years ago. And they rejected him out of thought. They were obviously afraid that the comrades-in-arms would help restore order in our country. Events in Africa, and even earlier in other areas, show that democratizers are not burdened with moral principles. For them, the main thing is to protect their interests anywhere in the world. And there is nothing to blame Lukashenko. He always defends the interests of his country. And we constantly substitute him. Even if you don’t wait for a positive response from the Central Asian republics, the question should be worked out and we are obliged to protect the interests of, above all, Russia, and be prepared to counter all possible directions. We have too many enemies and ill-wishers. True, our leadership probably does not think so. The situation in the world is changing very quickly. And the rearmament of our army is planned until 2020. Although, with the current attitude of Mr. Field-Maker Taburetkin, this period is also problematic. It would not be too late. Whose mill is it pouring water into?
    11. Max. M.M
      -2
      1 September 2011 11: 28
      If the Russian government would be smarter, it would destroy the Americans with their own weapons. That is, before the presidential election, the United States bribed for a lot of money, or was hypnotized in some way, by the future president of the United States, and if the President of America starts the election, then he executed all the orders of the RF!
    12. dmb
      0
      1 September 2011 12: 03
      Old man, a thinking man. Of course, he can handle his assholes himself. But after Libya, the scenario of "armed rebels" from private military companies, covered from above by "aviation democrats" is quite real. In Chechnya, it did not pass, because while nuclear weapons are available.
    13. go_by
      0
      1 September 2011 13: 31
      With Russia, everything is more complicated. This is not Libya. I also understand the mausoleum of plywood. But St. Basil's Cathedral ?! Although what the hell is not joking. Maybe the Turks already somewhere in Germany are working with jigsaws ...
    14. ZEBRASH
      +3
      1 September 2011 14: 29
      I think that the "Libyan scenario" in Russia is very difficult to implement. The Russians had enough of the shocks of 1991, and you can see what this led to, and many support Putin and his government. In Libya, Gaddafi stayed in power and tired of many. And then there is the indignation in neighboring countries, and even the instigation of the pendos and the EU.
      1. panzersoldat
        0
        1 September 2011 15: 12
        It may not reach the Pavstans, but they can undermine the economy or cause strikes.
    15. zczczc
      0
      1 September 2011 15: 53
      Old Man lives on the edge of problems. Everything that happens to Belarus is our future, when Putin completely sells oil and gas, with the only difference that if now we can keep Belarus "under a dropper", then there will be no one to keep us.
    16. +7
      1 September 2011 16: 39
      You represent NATO bases in Belarus. Belarus is our real ally, let there be more military exercises with them. Belarus cannot survive without Russia, it will be worse against the West and without them.
    17. +1
      1 September 2011 21: 41
      I read it and came to the conclusion. The West is unlikely to go into direct confrontation with Russia. There is gas and oil, nuclear weapons, and the unpredictable impulse of the Russian soul! The hungry and angry people will quickly cross any border - Europe is near! But to offer us new, humanitarian and democratic values ​​will not stop, I think there will even be an increase in the flow of crap from the favorite zombie box! It will be difficult to defeat a Russian man in battle, but to give him a new goal in the form of green money and a bunch of beautiful devices, to replace national pride with complaisance is the main goal of the West. And then we will exchange our oil for life in the western "paradise" ............... without war, noise and dust .............. !! !
    18. merkawa
      -3
      1 September 2011 23: 00
      Old Man caught the smell of fried and makes moves like a true chairman of the state farm, and senile senility is already affected by the presumptuous prince (nothing personal)
    19. SAVA
      +3
      1 September 2011 23: 31
      Sooner he realized, or later, the main thing is he realized !!! And Ukraine would join the "union". and it would not hurt to create something like "DND". Or to give the Cossacks more authority (whatever if something happens they say that the government is shooting at the "rebels"), that would put things in order according to the people, people know in the face of the scum in their city, gradually order will come. And the Libyan scenario will not work for us.
    20. +1
      2 September 2011 02: 28
      I agree with the Old Man. One must think how to deal with such revolutions. The Internet, traitors and a crowd of fools (or mercenaries) - and here the scenario of the revolution is ready in Russia too. With a huge mass of passive population. Didn’t you understand that a new scenario of the Orange Revolution was tested in Libya - this is when it is impossible to arrange a bloodless change of power in supposedly democratic elections, and then one part of the country is pitted against another, and it raced. Guess who is running in for? We have all the voices about the revolution coming up - well, here's one of the parties to the conflict. Give these people (who completely consider themselves Russian, and who want good things for Russia, probably) money, weapons, information and military support - and here we are in Libya. Well, they’re getting ready for the 12th year - Putin will most likely win too, and then the crowds of angry (both prepared in advance and information, and who military) will start a mutiny somewhere in Siberia. Some kind of transitional council will be created, out of incomprehensible persons (the liberals have already lit up, we need unknown ones). Selling generals and officials will start to buy up and run across, the army too - we do not like the core, we want a better life - more democratic. And all this under the deafening applause of the West on all news channels. And even if the rebels do not win, the country will fall into at least two parts (and the one that immediately will be friends with the West with resources). As an option - it’s very possible. Well, think what is more important to you, but I’d better go shoot such rebels - the rulers come and go, and I have one country.
    21. +5
      2 September 2011 11: 23
      Well done Lukashenko!
      Ukraine - Belarus - Russia - brothers, we support you, we need to unite.
      It may even be possible to create, in opposition to NATO, a united bloc that will include the CIS countries, China, Cuba, Idia, Muslim countries, and the rest, and others. To lure the NATO countries that come to their senses to themselves.
      By the way, what, Ukraine is not included in the CRRF ??? ((((
      Yes, and we must HARDLY suppress all sorts of revolutions, putsches, rebels!
      By the way, you can not only stop interference from outside in your own countries, but also organize it in other countries: (USA, Great Britain, France, Italy, Canada, etc.) let your tricks and coups darn.
      Enough to defend yourself, to resist information warfare and other threats, it’s time to put all this out to THEIR territory!
    22. cattle
      0
      2 September 2011 16: 12
      You need to start from the base, the basics as you want to call it, and our base is our children. With a modern education, in 15-20 years we won’t need to win ... Such friends as Mr. Fursenko, and no enemies are needed, ALREADY is routine of our children ... because it’s easy to manage cattle, show your finger on the TV and laugh behind the scenes (how cool it is). And then it’s by chance to say that you’re not a people now, but that the population and the land are now not yours, but that it belongs to all the people of the earth and it’s cool and ass licking Pindos is cool too ... and everything is cool with us, you just eat burgers and drink Coke !!!!!!!!!! And I respect Grigoryevich
    23. Shqvarqi
      +1
      2 September 2011 17: 22
      Most of the "western" countries of the world, where there is a sufficiently developed class of "elite" who can influence the decisions of their leader in foreign policy, naturally think about

      WELLBEING FOR YOURSELF.
      In Belarus, there is no elite, there is an authoritarian leader. NOT the worst, note. As in all territories of the post-Soviet space. Where after the collapse of the USSR, no

      there were simply no class or social groups, and power was in the hands, call it what you like (scum, cunning, rich, etc., etc.) but certainly strong people. Somebody

      of them it turned out to be smarter, someone is a larger business executive, someone is weaker than the rest. (Kuchma, Akayev, Shevarnadze). The term of their reign depended on this. (no matter helped them in this

      western countries or not). But no regime can be overthrown from outside, with the help of "orange" revolutions, if there are no prerequisites for this within the country itself. Strong mode can

      to overthrow only by real force, a full-scale military action. (Iraq, Libya)
      1. MichaelVl
        -2
        28 September 2011 11: 45
        shqVarqi,
        I support :)
    24. Shqvarqi
      -2
      2 September 2011 17: 22
      In Russia and some CIS countries, the so-called "elite groups", the prerequisites of the ruling class, are just beginning to be established.
      "Elite groups" are small groups of people united by financial or ideological interests that influence the domestic and foreign policy of their country.
      In Russia "Oligarchs", in the Caucasus - clans. (Aliyevs, teip of the Kadyrovs)

      Belarus also has its own "elite group" - I can assume that it consists of 5-10 people (no more), mainly from law enforcement agencies.
      Now they prefer not to shine, but do all the work due to the mass of dissatisfied, in connection with the economic crisis. They are already fed up with Lukashenko’s policy, which is not shared

      power, and does not allow anyone to the state feeding trough. As Putin did for example. (flexible politician)
      That’s why Lukashenko raised the theme of the use of the CRRF in order to prevent coups within the CSTO states, as he is afraid of an armed rebellion supported by the security forces.
      Another thing, but will the countries of CRRF do this?
      The prospects for outside interference from the West are very slim. It is unlikely that Russia is close by. Only indirect support of the opposition with finances and "weapons".
    25. Comrade
      -1
      2 September 2011 17: 31
      The Libyan scenario is a new US project to overthrow all unwanted regimes around the world ... The colored `` bloodless '' revolutions did not live up to expectations .... they either failed, or after a while the pro-Western regimes lost power and wobble in society .. .. Now the `` democrats '' are acting with the military support of the United States and NATO .... something like this: whoever does not accept our power voluntarily and with joy will be destroyed in the name of democracy and freedom ... the main thing for the West is to beat back the grandmother ... for example, as in Libya, the French aspiration for democracy miraculously turns into 35% of the oil industry ...
    26. Shqvarqi
      -1
      2 September 2011 17: 33
      I give an explanation, in Russia there is an elite group (created by the leader himself - Putin, which helped him to maintain power and stabilize the situation in the country) Ten is better than one.
      In Belarus - there are only prerequisites for it (dissatisfied), and ALL
      power belongs to the authoritarian leader - Lukashenko.

      This is only my opinion on this article.
    27. nickname bj
      0
      2 September 2011 22: 38
      As Roosevelt said: “Samos, of course, is a son of a bitch, but he is our son of a bitch ...”
      The same can be said about our leadership. We must educate it ...
    28. oper66
      0
      3 September 2011 17: 07
      Neither the United States nor the EU will conduct a military operation against Russia. Do you think that the usa or england needs our territories in their composition? no / they only need full control over resources. !!!!! they are not going to accept us as part of their state and to give their citizenship !!!!. the period of direct colonization has long passed, NEOCOLLONIZATION is being carried out, in fact, in our country and on the territory of the CIS it has been completed, it has only stalled a bit, they (the imperialists) own everything and the Central Bank and the mining industry, only leave the appearance of statehood and sovereignty so that the masses did not raise the butch. because neocolonization is much more effective and less unprofitable for them, and the managers Ebnshchiks appointed by them during his reign coped successfully with their duties, but Putin and his team who succeeded him tasted the taste of power and money and did not want to give everything to them completely and obey their commands, and indeed Strengthening the army has only a rejection of the anger of the people, since the army is the main sign of statehood and guarantees independence, but I will make a reservation once again in essence the CIS countries and Russia, including those who are already NEOCOLONIZED, and they are not going to disrupt energy supplies. But in the case of national-patriotic power coming to power and the threat of their property and control over their (our) resources !!! no one is going to carry the colored revolutions to us under the guise of some ideas of democracy, AND WILL TAKE A FULL-SCALE WAR WITH APPLICATION OF ALL TYPES OF WEAPONS AND NUCLEAR AND CHEMISTRIES, TO CONSUMPTION OF THE PEOPLE THERE ARE CONSIDERABLE TO IT THIS IS SO DEAR !!!. Based on the foregoing, the sense of the ongoing reforms in the army of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of public health and other areas of state activity also follows, there is a slow almost imperceptible rejection of the social state, little by little we add poison so that we do not die immediately, but get used to our future prepared for them, stupid an uneducated society for servicing enterprises of the raw material industry, incapable of understanding its status and obedient to any order of overseers at the direction of true owners.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"