Canada's Northern Strategy

11
Canada's Northern Strategy

Late last week, current Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper spent the whole day 4 in the Canadian Arctic. The overflight of the Canadian military bases in the northern provinces of Nunavut, Yukon and the Northwest Territories became traditional for the prime minister during the years of his rule (in power since February 2006 of the year). Stephen Harper has already visited Canada's Arctic possessions on 6. The Canadian Prime Minister himself has repeatedly noted that his visits are taking place within the framework of the implementation of the so-called. "Northern strategy". Canada’s northern strategy includes an increase in the military presence in the Arctic, socio-economic development and environmental protection in the polar latitudes. In fact, Moscow’s articulated plans for the Arctic include the same points.

The military component of Ottawa was clearly in a priority place. Barely arrived in the Arctic, Stephen Harper became an observer of military exercises in which land forces, the Navy and the Air Force took part. Although military maneuvers are held for the 5 time, they have not yet taken such a scale. Speaking to the Canadian military, the prime minister said that an increase in the military presence in the Arctic is essential to protect the national interests of the state. However, Harper also did not forget about the economic interests, looking at the gold mine launched a year ago.

It should be noted that strengthening the Canadian presence in the Arctic was originally the basis of Harper’s policy. As part of its northern strategy, the prime minister planned to establish 2 new naval bases, modernize the 2 already in place, and build and build a heavy icebreaker 3. The onset of the global financial and economic crisis slowed down the implementation of these ambitious plans, but did not lead to a complete rejection of them. From whom Ottawa intends to defend itself in the north - it is not difficult to guess. Other countries having access to the Arctic - the United States, Denmark and Norway are its allies in the North Atlantic Alliance. Only the Russian Federation remains.

Here's how, for example, Canadian Prime Minister 2 reacted a year ago to the appearance in neutral waters near the Canadian state of the Russian strategic bomber Tu-95: "I have repeatedly expressed the deep concern of our government caused by Russia's increasingly aggressive actions around the world and in our air force space. " Canada will defend its airspace and respond to every call when "Russians encroach on Canada’s sovereignty," the Prime Minister said. Very frankly, said the leader of Canada.

The authorities of Canada louder than other competitors of Russia dispute the Russian identity of the submarine ridge to them. Lomonosov. The meaning is clear. If Russia proves that the Lomonosov Ridge is a continuation of the continental shelf of Siberia, the Russian Federation will stake a large part of the shelves of the Arctic Ocean, along with the richest hydrocarbon deposits. In 2010, Canadian Foreign Minister Lawrence Cannon openly announced this during his visit to Russia.

Stephen Harper preferred to speak not only about pure geopolitics or economics, but also about “freedom and democracy”. According to the Canadian Prime Minister, the geopolitical importance of the Arctic region and the interests of the Canadian state have never been greater there than in the current period. “That's why our government voiced an ambitious“ northern course, ”based on the timeless responsibility placed on our state, to keep the true North strong and free,” the Canadian prime minister said. Apparently, for the sake of preserving the “freedom of the North”, the Canadian military machine is being strengthened in the north, closer to our borders.

The prime minister and local media are pushing for the strengthening of Canadian military forces in the North. Perhaps, Canada would prefer that the Northwest Passage still remain a quiet backwater, as this will help preserve the fragile ecosystems of the Arctic zone and the traditional way of life of the Eskimos. “However, if Canadians still support the sustainable development of the North and the creation of jobs for northerners, they may miss their chance,” said one of the main Canadian newspapers, The Globe and Mail.

The rationale for the need for vigorous activity, the publication sees in the melting ice of the Arctic Ocean. As reported by the UN expert commission, the ice is melting faster than previously thought. According to new forecasts, the ocean will be completely free in 30-40 in summer, and the Northwest Passage can be freed in 20 in years. Changing ice conditions makes the Northwest Passage a new route for merchant shipping, the publication says.

More frankly expressed the publication of the Toronto Sun. "Premier Harper ... should speak harshly to any countries that believe" that they can control our activities in the Arctic region. Since it is in the Canadian part of the Arctic, 25% of the still unexplored world hydrocarbon reserves lie. “This is a real gold mine,” Canadian journalists say.


Stephen Harper.

According to the publication, Canada should "talk hard" Russia and China, who are building new icebreakers, as "pickups." “It’s time to add words to deeds,” reported Canadian journalists. Canadian Prime Minister "must uphold the irrefutable fact that the Great White North is ours. This is a ticket to the future for Canada, for our children and for our children’s children. And this should be the number one priority," the Canadian edition demands.

In July, the Toronto Sun simply intimidated Canadian citizens with a “Russian threat”. "Russians are coming! Russians are coming!". It was about news from Russia - the military announced plans to create two "Arctic Brigades". “Canada is not going to lay out a carpet for them,” the Canadian publication warned. This was followed by real wartime rhetoric. “What is ours is ours, and we make it clear. We will not retreat. " We should not limit ourselves only to military exercises, we must strengthen our presence in the Arctic, and demonstrate to the Russians that their plan will meet resistance. According to Canadian journalists, the "misfortune" that determine the legality of the Arctic claims of the Arctic countries will be the UN. And Canada "rightly does not take the UN seriously." In fact, the newspaper urges official Ottawa to spit on international law, since the UN interferes with Canadian geopolitical and economic interests.

In turn, another edition of Global Research directly reports on the "Russian trace" in the military maneuvers of the Canadian armed forces in the north of the state. According to the publication, the Russian Federation is doing what any other normal country would do in its place, it protects its national, economic interests. And “Last Year's“ Operation Nanook ”was conducted as a direct response to renewed Russian claims in the Arctic Ocean.” It should be noted that for the first time the military of other NATO countries - the United States and Denmark - took part in these exercises.

In addition to voiced military activities, Canadian naval forces intend to buy up to eight (8) patrol ships with a special reinforced hull, which will be able to perform the tasks of patrolling, controlling navigation, conducting search and rescue operations, and protecting the environment in the exclusive economic zone. Canada and in the Arctic. Therefore, in addition to 3,3 billion dollars, which are necessary for the construction of ships, the Canadian Navy will need another 4,5 billion dollars to ensure their normal functioning during the 25-year operation period. In Ottawa, it is believed that the purchase and deployment of patrol ships will allow the Canadian state to protect its strategic interests in the Arctic zone, in conditions of constantly growing competition for natural resources in this region.

As Canadian military plan, the patrol ships will be built at Canadian shipyards, when the work on the initial design stage is completed. The duration of the preliminary stage is estimated at 2 of the year. The first ships should enter combat formation already in 2014 year. The new Canadian Navy ships will be equipped with modern weapons systems and will be able to effectively patrol the Arctic region even if there is a dense ice sheet. In 2010, due to the difficult financial and economic situation, the Canadian government considered reducing the number of Arctic patrol ships purchased to six (6) units, and also thinking about replacing 76- and 57-mm weapon systems with 25-mm machine guns. However, as a result, due to the strategic importance of ensuring the interests of the Canadian state in the Arctic zone, a decision was made to implement the naval program in full.

A feature of the development of the Canadian Armed Forces is the fact that Ottawa does not reduce them. So, in June 2008, the First Canadian Defense Strategy was announced. This is the Canadian Armed Forces Development Program for the period from 2008 to 2027. According to this program, during this time, defense spending should increase from $ 18 billion to more than $ 30 billion, and the share of military spending in relation to GDP should increase from 1,5% to 2%. The number of regular forces is planned to increase (!) To 70 thousand, the reserve - up to 30 thousand people. This is somewhat unexpected, since many other Western countries are reducing military spending and the size of their armed forces. Ottawa plans to have, albeit relatively small, but well-armed, trained forces capable of quickly deploying to remote theaters of military operations and conducting military operations there for a rather long time. In addition, the decision to switch to lighter armored vehicles was revised, in this regard, the experience of Afghanistan helped. In 2007, they decided to strengthen the striking power of the AC 100 with new tanks “Leopard 2”, 8 reconnaissance and strike UAVs and 17 MLRS installations.

In addition, it must be said that Canada claims leadership in the Arctic and among NATO countries, not intending to give up its position to the United States. Although, if the plan for the creation of the North American states of America is implemented, where Mexico will enter (where the US intelligence services are already operating like at home), the USA and Canada, all contradictions will be forgotten. And Russia will have to defend its interests in the Arctic, from the new giant.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    11 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. ZEBRASH
      +5
      1 September 2011 07: 43
      The Japanese demand the South Kuriles, the NATO members are dividing the Arctic without us. Well, even though our government has not yet thought of selling land - it was not for nothing that the president traveled to the Kuriles and put a flag at the North Pole. And the Arctic is also needed by the Russian "powers that be" with their own oil and gas.
      1. LESHA pancake
        +2
        1 September 2011 07: 54
        CANADA APPETIT HAS APPEARED IN THE ARCTIC AND MORE THAN TO THE TERRITORY OF RUSSIA.
    2. bells
      +7
      1 September 2011 08: 23
      The Tu-95 is good, but small exercises with launching missiles from submarines would be better, and if we add anti-terror exercises at an arctic station with an amphibious landing, it would be very good.
    3. Crazyzy
      +3
      1 September 2011 12: 50
      A very not weak shooter went hunting for the “northern energy bear”. Therefore, carefully following the political demarches of Canada, we need to build a “defense” of our Arctic wealth decisively and seriously. In order not to be late.
    4. svvaulsh
      +2
      1 September 2011 13: 21
      The Canadians strongly remind me of one character from "Mowgli". There was a jackal named Tabaki. Everyone yapped from behind Sher Khan.
    5. +1
      1 September 2011 13: 23
      This is called the division of labor. Just the United States and Canada are very related states.
    6. +4
      1 September 2011 21: 51
      Listen, we need an army of 5 million, a dime a dozen enemies, it's time to distribute ammunition.
      1. Ivan35
        +5
        1 September 2011 22: 05
        Here I am about the same constantly Figvam! We also need a bigger army - but IT IS IMPORTANT TO ADD - and the union must be revived - the rsfsr alone or Russia (whatever you call it) will not cope with the pressure - without the joining of Belarus, Kazakhstan and ukraine, the Slavs will not be able to defend independence from the "world government"

        But our enemies, unlike us, are united and soldered into one shot-down team - We say Canada - we mean the British - we speak the British or Australians - we mean Pindos and their financial oligarchs
    7. +1
      1 September 2011 23: 10
      Do they have mania or a phobia? We won’t give up our territories, and we don’t need strangers!
    8. Comrade
      0
      2 September 2011 16: 55
      I won’t be surprised if Canadians secretly acquire (or have already acquired) nuclear weapons ... to defend the Free Democratic North ...

      And what kind of porridge will brew when the time comes to divide the Antarctic and the interests of the leading world powers collide .... here and not far from the Third World ...
    9. 0
      3 January 2014 23: 51
      The Kyoto Protocol obliges developed countries and countries with economies in transition to reduce or stabilize greenhouse gas emissions. Countries that have signed but not ratified the US Protocol. Countries that did not sign the protocol Afghanistan, Andorra, Vatican, Western Sahara. Countries that have exited Canada.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"