The war is not over yet, and the Islamic world is waiting for further "modernization"

While the Western world is celebrating victory over Gaddafi, others understand that the overthrow of Gaddafi only further destabilizes the situation in the region and in the world. Thus, the German organization in defense of peace, the Federal Committee of Friedensratschlag, concluded that “the United Nations could be considered the loser in this war.” It was the UN that allowed such a situation that the North Atlantic Alliance attacked the state and in fact “beat out” its regime. According to German leaders: “The principles for the prohibition of violence (paragraph 2.4), territorial integrity and state sovereignty (paragraph 2.2) and non-interference in the internal affairs of countries (paragraph 2.7), enshrined in the UN Charter, were forgotten.”

According to the writer and publicist Yuri Krupnova"We need a tribunal for Libya." It is criminal, immoral and just short-sighted to keep silent when such events occur. “Today is Libya. Tomorrow is Syria. The day after tomorrow, Russia itself. ” The UN Security Council resolution has been violated - Moscow is silent, the ground operation of the NATO forces and their Arab allies against the forces of Gaddafi has actually been carried out, we are silent again. The only way for the official authorities of the Russian Federation to save face is to conduct an international investigation into the NATO intervention in the internal affairs of Libya "or at least the public Tribunal for Libya as a non-governmental organization." Analysis and analysis of the situation around Libya will make it possible to change the situation around Syria, and Russia itself, “to interrupt this chain of gangster regime changes, raider attacks of entire states”.

Now in the world, the situation of the 30s is actually repeated, when the aggressors tried to "pacify". As a result, impunity led to World War II. The Russian Federation should "stop pursuing the same policy of appeasement, good-naturedly ranting about the" inadmissibility of NATO expansion to the east ", while NATO has now ten years in the heart of the East, in Afghanistan." It is necessary to investigate all the crimes of NATO, starting with Iraq and Yugoslavia.

According to Alexander Rahr, a political scientist, a member of the German Foreign Policy Council: "Many representatives of the Western establishment believe that the" Arab spring "is just beginning." Therefore, in this regard, we should expect a serious "modernization of the entire Islamic world", which will affect all states of the region to one degree or another. The first in this line is Syria, under the blow and the current ally of the West, Saudi Arabia, plans for its dismemberment have already been made public. But currently "the focus of the West is on North Africa." Democratization will affect all countries of North Africa, including Algeria, Morocco.

Algeria in North Africa is one of the first candidates for "modernization". This state has hardly been touched yet, but the “bells” have already gone. One of the “bells” is a terrorist attack in a military academy, for which al Qaeda has taken responsibility. At the same time, representatives of the radical group reported that the army of Algeria was chosen as the target for their attack, since the Algerian government supports the leader of Libya, Muammar Gaddafi. "While the Libyan Muslims were preparing to end their battle with Muammar Gaddafi, the Mujahideen in Algeria made a blessed attack against the criminal regime, an ally of Gaddafi," Reuters reported.

It should be noted that the winners, with the support of NATO and a number of countries in the Arab world, the Libyan opposition, have already begun to complain about bad Algeria. They say that Gaddafi hid there, during the war the Algerian authorities helped the regime of the Libyan dictator. The authorities of Algeria have not yet recognized the authority of the National Transitional Council. In addition, according to recent reports, it was in Algeria that the Gaddafi family moved - a wife, two sons and a daughter. With its policy, Algeria actually challenged the Western coalition. Representatives of the EU and the United States have already expressed their dissatisfaction with the policy of Abdelaziz Bouteflika. The Algerian authorities have severely suppressed the speeches of their opposition. There are forces on which to rely on - radical Islamists, organizations of Berbers, with whom Paris has established channels of communication.

The political scientist believes that in the EU countries and in the USA there is a clear intention to encourage any regime that opposes autocratic regimes. A unique chance has come to modernize the countries of the Arab world. The idea of ​​the Union of the Mediterranean Sea will also be realized. What is happening in the countries of the Islamic and Arab world will in many respects resemble the situation of the end of 1980-s - the beginning of 1990-s associated with the fall of the communist regimes.

The war is not over yet

While Gaddafi is alive and at large, the war in Libya is not over yet. Libyan rebels themselves also think so. So, the chairman of the opposition Transitional National Council (PNS) Mustafa Abdel Jalil called on the North Atlantic Alliance to extend the 5-month military campaign in the Libyan state and launch new ones aviation attacks on positions of government forces that have remained loyal to Muammar Gaddafi. Jalil called on NATO countries and other participants in the war against the Gaddafi regime to "protect them from the tyrant." Since he "still poses a threat not only to Libyans, but to the whole world," Reuters reported.

In turn, US Admiral Samuel Locklear said that the Alliance will continue to help the rebels. In his opinion, the regime of the Libyan leader is on the verge of collapse, and the military operation will be completed. The operation, according to the statement of the American admiral, will continue at least until September September 27.

The “small homeland” of Gaddafi Sirte is still not surrendering. It is attacked by NATO aircraft and rebel artillery.

Comments

[PSih2097]

One of the “bells and whistles” is a terrorist attack in a military academy, for which Al-Qaeda took responsibility. At the same time, representatives of the radical group reported that the army of Algeria was chosen as the target for their attack, since the Syrian government supports the leader of Libya, Muammar Gaddafi.

Something I didn’t understand, but what about Syria?

In turn, US Admiral Samuel Locklear said that the Alliance will continue to help the rebels. In his opinion, the Libyan leader’s regime is on the verge of collapse, and the military operation will be brought to an end. The operation at the request of the American admiral will continue until at least September 27th.

Yes, yes, yes, they have been shouting about the collapse since April, only Gaddafi is alive and free.

[Roman Skomorokhov]

Well, Gaddafi will finish it, this is a fact, unfortunately. But I hope that he will be lucky, and he will not repeat the path of Milosevic or Hussein. Enough

Syria in the text has nothing to do with, it is with the text. Just see, have not figured out yet, with whom to start, with Algeria or Syria. There are reasons for both the first and second.

It no longer seems to me, I am sure that in the light of the outbreak of the Third World War, it is time for the Islamic countries to seriously think about a coalition in order to repel external enemies who want to set them on the path of "true democracy."
Unless of course, they are not interested in this result: Democracy = civil war + bombings + terrorist attacks + general chaos and silent seizure of natural resources.

I think that the example of Libya brought everybody up.

[dna]

I wonder if you really hope that the person who gave the order — let’s take at least the last month — to shoot 150 prisoners on the spot — again, take the word of Gaddafi’s supporters — the rebels will be lucky and he will escape the trial, either in The Hague or in Libya itself? Or do you seriously think that 1) such an order is in the order of things, and 2) NATO troops do this themselves?

By the way, what valiant leader and father of the nation runs in the middle of the night like a jackal, leaving the soldiers who die for him to die without him? This, by the way, promising to pre-fight to the "last drop of blood." Only apparently not his own. Or do you think that he needs to survive as a symbol of "free" Libya?

[LESHA pancake]

I just saw on video how rebels shot a car with unarmed people, so these bastards are no better than kadafi.

[dna]

It is possible that some of them are scum better than Gaddafi, although it is unlikely to be much worse, simply because it is much worse difficult. You want to say that since the rebel is not better, then Gaddafi is not right to judge? For me, both must be judged. And the fact that the rebels, if they win and not too many unarmed people are killed, is likely to escape the court, it does not suit me at all. But this does not mean that Gaddafi himself is not to blame for anything.

By the way, Gaddafi many times offered to blame without trial for all his previous atrocities. Would be smarter, would dump. He refused, committed more atrocities, but when everything was completely lost, he ran away in the middle of the night like a rat, leaving the soldiers who supported him. So now, by right, he will most likely be judged in The Hague, although he can still hide in the basements and all sorts of holes for a long time. But if they don’t judge, but they shoot or shoot up like a dog, even if they are unarmed, I won’t especially regret it. He lived his whole life by such rules and did just that with others. Why does anyone better than him?

[dna]

I don’t understand at all why to regret Milosevic, and especially Hussein. Well, yes, let's say it is not known SURE whether Milosevic personally ordered the cut. I am sure I did not mind. Well, the death penalty didn’t shine for him in The Hague, but he earned the right to shine. And, like Gaddafi, he could have avoided it if he had realized in time what was what and stopped the massacre. But he waited until they stopped without him. So in general, everything with him was absolutely correct. But Hussein really pulled up almost barbaric, but again, why pity him? He himself killed thousands in the same way, and even sent the family a bill for the bullet. To those who believe that he did not receive his death penalty, exactly what it was, the question is: have his victims been honored? Or does someone think that the Western media came up with the victims? Because those who exactly Hussein lifted clearly believed in the ego of abuse, and I think not from the words of the media. How this happened is deeply problematic because it degrades the current Iraqi government, as it is, almost to the level of Hussein himself, and not for any other reason.

And by the way, the fact that in the past the state government or any other Western atrocity did not change the fact that Milosevic and Hussei got what they should. It would be better if those people got it. But the fact that they did not receive in any way does not mean that Milosevic and Hussein should not have received, like once it is possible, then everyone can. No one is allowed, but not all can be punished.

[LESHA pancake]

Unfortunately, this DAMA taught us nothing.

[DEfindER]

So the American military elite openly declares, Quote:
We need to overthrow the regimes of Gaddafi and Assad to completely squeeze Russia and China out of the Mediterranean!
Moreover, crowding out China is even more important for them, because by depriving him of resources, they will undermine his economy. Namely, China was actively investing in the development of the Jamahiriya.

Gaddafi is a genius who made his people the richest in Africa, and his country one of the most influential in the Region. And how can you do without repression if the West officially sponsors all anti-government movements.

[ballian]

China for your information at the UN voted the same as Russia and also does not yell about "bloody NATO"
And there are no our bases or economic preferences in Libya.
About the "genius" of Gaddafi - it's very funny, with a small population sitting on huge oil reserves, it is not difficult to become the richest country in poverty-stricken and poor Africa. - the population there lives in poverty - do not believe the nonsense of which the Internet is overflowing.
The economy there practically consists of oil production alone - for this gigantic money, Gaddafi did not create either industry or agriculture - such a "genius".
And what is Gaddaffy's "influence"? Does he have allies ??
Yes, it all merged including the Arab countries - Libya has always been a country that the surrounding countries hated.
The dictator always refers to the opposition to him as "bought" by external enemies.

[Dovmont]

What then did this same genius throw off from the throne by their fellow citizens?

[ballian]

Quote: Dovmont

threw their fellow citizens from the throne

[dna]

First, what Dovmont said above. Secondly, what did Ballian say about dictators and the "bought" opposition?

Thirdly:

Quote: DEfindER

And how can you do without repression if the West officially sponsors all anti-government movements.

Are you serious? If not 100% are satisfied with the authorities, and let's say even some (although this is nonsense) take money from the "West" for what they say publicly about their discontent, then the repression is justified?

There is a union, by the way, all over the West, with all its might, sponsored anti-government movements. Somehow, there were not only repressions, but also serious anti-government movements. What is it that dictators have such problems all the time with anti-government movements sponsored by the vile west?

[AleksUkr]

It's not about the regime in Libya. Events there are fraught not only for African countries. They can no longer be saved. The United States lifted its tail and is eager to democratize new states. We would save ourselves. And with the state of our Armed Forces, their new look, we will not go far. More precisely, we can call in so that there will be no return. Much has been said about strengthening the army, but nothing is being done. Our favorite overbearing tandem can do nothing. They are probably themselves dependent on the American Politburo. It has been established that 40% of the president’s instructions are not being fulfilled. Accordingly, the prime minister is no less. All are busy with optimization, rollbacks, renaming and other unseemly acts. Look at the composition of our Council of Ministers. All the best friends of someone but not their people. Relatives rule. And the GDP, respected by all the war veterans, is nothing and nobody ... But actually, he needs to decide on the membership in the party that he leads. The party’s chairman is not a member. This Russian insanity. And you want to do business ... Hoping is not harmful.