We take care of ourselves. "MiG" responded to accusations of selling fifth-generation technology to China

13
Last Thursday, Western media reported that the fifth-generation Chinese fighter J-20 was built using Russian technology. The reason for this conclusion was the similarity of the J-20 with the experimental Russian prototype - the fifth-generation fighter MiG 1.44 MFI (product 1.44 of the Mikoyan Design Bureau), which never went into production.

We take care of ourselves. "MiG" responded to accusations of selling fifth-generation technology to China


“We do not supply any units, assemblies and technologies of the MiG 1.44 to China for the development of the fifth-generation fighter J-20”

"It seems that they got access to ... documents related to the Mikoyan project - an aircraft that the Ministry of Defense refused to tender for the construction of an invisible plane," a source told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

A week later, RAC MiG decided to come up with an official denial of this information. Russia has never delivered, does not deliver and will not supply components and assemblies to China to create the fifth generation fighter Chengdu J-20 "Black Eagle", said spokesman for RAC "MiG" Elena Fedorova. “We do not supply any units, assemblies and technologies of the MiG 1.44 to China for the development of the fifth-generation fighter J-20,” said a representative of the aircraft manufacturing corporation RIA “News».

Experts of the VZGLYAD newspaper then also considered the transfer of any Russian aviation technology to China is impossible. If only because Russia and China are direct competitors in the world market weapons and the issuance of its "secrets" of Russia is unprofitable.

Meanwhile, a high-ranking source in the Russian defense industry said he didn’t know which way China acquired Russian technology — legal or through espionage. In the "MiG" about the possibility or impossibility of information leakage through spies did not say anything.

Interestingly, the accusations of using Russian technology in the design of the fifth-generation fighter fell on China immediately after the J-20 made its first flight at the beginning of the year. Then the US Congressman Buck McKeon said that China had stolen technology from Russia to create his fighter. For advanced technology, China should be grateful for cyber espionage in Russia, the congressman said, adding that such methods of China are of serious concern to the United States.

The same US also saw the similarity of the Chinese J-20 with the American F-22 fighter, especially their nose pieces. The United States also believes that China has unlawfully learned the technology of a cockpit-free lantern that is used on the F-22 and F-35 fighter jets.

It is worth noting that military experts judge the fifth-generation Chinese fighter from amateur photographs and videos found on the Internet. China has not officially shown its aircraft to the general public. Meanwhile, according to the assessment of aviation experts who studied the images, the photo showed a real-life aircraft. The existence of a new Chinese fighter is confirmed by US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.

Rise and fall


Military expenses of the largest countries of the world


The Russian MiG 1.44 fighter began to be created back in 1979, as opposed to the American F-22 fighter, and surpassed its American rival in a number of characteristics. Requirements of supersonic cruising speed, super-maneuverability and stealth were made to the aircraft.

To implement these requirements, a number of industry research institutes conducted a large amount of research. The first working drawings were released in the 1986 year. However, in 1992, the funding for the program was sharply reduced, and the work was frozen until 1998. An experienced 1.44 fighter was first shown to 12 on January 1999 at the airfield in Zhukovsky, and on February 20, the fighter took to the air for the first time.

Serial production of the fighter was supposed at the Nizhny Novgorod aircraft plant "Falcon". However, it was never started. Due to insufficient funding in the 90s, Russian fighter technology has become obsolete and increasingly inferior to the US. As a result, the project was decided to close. MiG 1.44 remained the experimental Russian prototype of the fifth generation fighter.

August 17 at the International Aviation and Space Salon held a demonstration flight of the fifth-generation Russian fighter T-50. Two cars performed several aerobatic maneuvers, including flying at extremely low altitude with the engine almost shut off. This is the first flight of the T-50 to the public. The performance of the pilots watched by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin

At the moment, Russia, the United States and China are the only countries that conduct flight tests of fifth-generation fighter jets. The US is experiencing F-35 (this is the second fighter), in China - J-20, and in Russia - PAK FA (T-50).

Moreover, the United States turned out to be the highest of all, in which fifth-generation fighter aircraft were adopted since the 2005 of the year (this is the most expensive fighter in the F-22 Raptor world).

The Russian T-50 made its first flight a year earlier than the Chinese fighter - in January 2010. As the developer of the Sukhoi Design Bureau plans, in 2013, at KnAAPO in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, small-scale production of fighters for testing will begin, and in 2015, their mass production.

The fifth-generation Chinese fighter Chengdu J-20 "Black Eagle" was first announced in November 2009. In January of this year, he made the first demonstration flight during the visit of former US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to Beijing. The Chinese authorities intend to put their fighter into service in 2017 – 2019.

According to Chinese official sources, the J-20 is capable of developing supersonic speed without the use of afterburner, as well as maneuvering with large overloads. Meanwhile, a single twin-engine J-20 is heavier than the Russian T-50 and the American F-22. The J-20 has a delta wing (like the J-10) with two tilted all-turning vertical stabilizers (like the T-50). The layout of the stealth fuselage is similar to the American F-22.

Cyber ​​espionage

China has repeatedly been accused of cyber espionage, including military aviation. For example, previously, experts found similarities between the Chinese C-602 cruise missile shown at the exhibitions and the Russian X-55. The Chinese carrier-based fighter J-15 looks like a Su-33. Experts suggest that Chinese engineers used the prototype previously received from Ukraine.

The loudest scandal broke out around the Chinese counterpart fighter Su-27 long-range aircraft. In 1995, the Russian and Chinese sides concluded an agreement on the licensed assembly of X-NUMX machines Su-200SK (in the Chinese version - J-27) at a factory in Shenyang. Only one hundred fighters were collected under the license, and China refused the rest. It turned out that China has managed to develop its components and during this decade has learned from them to assemble J-11 independently. Moreover, the Chinese engineers not only cloned the Su-11 in terms of avionics and radar equipment, but also decided the last stage of the technological puzzle - installation on a Chinese jet engine fighter.

Meanwhile, competition in the global market for military equipment between Russia and China has already begun. In 2009, the Chinese fighter JF-17 and the Russian MiG-29 participated in the tender for the supply to Myanmar, during which Russia won.

In 2010, the interests of Beijing and Moscow intersected in an Egyptian tender. For several years, Russia tried to convince Egypt to acquire about 40 MiG-29 fighters. However, the contract may be broken, since China, together with Pakistan, is offering Egypt to produce JF-17 fighter jets on its territory. The cost of the JF-17 is only 10 million dollars, while each copy of the MiG-29 will cost Egypt 35 million dollars.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. zczczc
    +2
    29 August 2011 10: 48
    Guys, with a difference in price of 3,5 times, this will all end as consumer goods. Dumping, bastards. I saw more than once on TV showed Chinese clothes with the words that the material from which they are made is more expensive than the price of the whole product.

    Why am I? I need to develop domestic consumption for both clothes and weapons. In the United States, one of the government’s strategies has always been to increase domestic consumption, and it starts with the size of the dwelling - you won’t buy a lot of everything, but a house ...
    1. Pol
      0
      29 August 2011 11: 40
      Of course you need to develop domestic consumption! This and jobs, technology, rising living standards finally ...
      For China, this has long been a paramount task. And given their potential domestic market (number of population) - huge volumes.
      That's just why it does not reach our leadership. Why is our domestic market miserable? We buy almost everything ....
  2. Oleg
    0
    29 August 2011 11: 35
    I do not believe what the Chinese will do according to the pattern of a duck. Until now, they have been seen in copying reliable, practical and life-tested products. In MiG 1.44, the wing works in the shadow of the elevon, which is not rational in subscription, not talking about trans speeds.
    1. svvaulsh
      0
      29 August 2011 12: 31
      Justify! There are ten advantages and disadvantages of the classical scheme and the "duck" scheme, in comparison with each other. And the most rational from the point of aerodynamics is a drop.
      1. Oleg
        0
        29 August 2011 22: 17
        A drop is rational for moving down. You yourself understand this, as you understand that the aircraft faces other tasks.
        You yourself can explain by examining the operation of the wing in a disturbed flow. The stream is outraged by the elevons. This is the issue of profitability. Having considered the displacement of the aerodynamic focus at transonic speeds, you will approach controllability. There are theses. Then she herself.
        1. svvaulsh
          0
          30 August 2011 13: 11
          The drop moves downward due to gravity, but this does not override the laws of aerodynamics. In this case, the wing obscures the stabilizers, which in a normal ABP scheme leads to a deterioration in aircraft controllability. PGO, in turn, leads to a displacement of the CMS, which makes the structure less stable, and therefore increases maneuverability. The question for filling is how the BP focus and CMS should be located so that the plane can perform BP braking (in common parlance "Cobra Pugacheva").
          1. svvaulsh
            0
            31 August 2011 16: 38
            And in response to silence! Q.E.D!
            1. Oleg
              0
              31 August 2011 22: 19
              Are you hinting that the Mig 1,44 is made for cobra?
              There is no desire to climb into the jungle of aerodynamics because we lose the essence of the issue.
              Namely: will the Chinese make a duck or not?
              My opinion: the price of exploitation will defeat the duck's zibzic benefits.
              An abstract example: which product do you think is better than TU-16 or TU-22? And at least a couple of reasons that would help the audience understand why China began to repeat the TU-16.
              1. svvaulsh
                0
                1 September 2011 14: 13
                Quote: Oleg
                better TU-16 or TU-22


                Which is better? Bulldozer or excavator?

                If they had sold the Tu-22 at one time, they would have copied it.
                Quote: Oleg
                on Mig 1,44 created for cobra


                It was not created and existed only as a model. No flight tests were carried out (it flew into the air once), so there is no information regarding the performance of the braking pressure.


                Quote: Oleg
                will the Chinese make a duck or not?


                Look at the Swedish flupen, French rafal, eurofighter. All of them are with PGO. And why can't the Chinese do the same?
                1. Oleg
                  0
                  1 September 2011 15: 40
                  I propose to stop the dispute. The Chinese decided such a plane to make a flag for them.
  3. +1
    29 August 2011 14: 03
    And the design of the article is interesting to me: in the table of military expenditures of countries - the United States is depicted against the background of its "Abrams", and all other countries on the silhouette of a German tank from the Second World War (according to Soviet classification) T-4 with a long 75 mm cannon .... USA against the background of its tank, and the rest against the background of an outdated and not native? Especially Russia, whose soldiers fired these tanks and knocked them into the War?
  4. 0
    29 August 2011 14: 05
    the Chinese that that cat - hears and eats. and they laid down all the charges.
  5. 0
    29 August 2011 23: 33
    I won’t believe that a dirty bureaucrat’s hand didn’t convey the secrets of the PRC. He doesn’t care about the country, because he, the official is now alone in chocolate ...