Need an innovative breakthrough

31
Need an innovative breakthrough


During the years of the Cold War era that seemed to have sunk into oblivion, despite numerous sanctions from the West and discriminatory legislative acts such as the Jackson – Vanik amendment that had been in force for many years, our country did not lose its “left-handers”, and its innovative developments were in demand on all continents . But the reforms 90-ies caused the domestic defense industry and other industries incomparably more damage.

Currently, the situation is also not simple. As Russian President Vladimir Putin said recently, the current economic model of Russian society has exhausted itself, maintaining the current economic situation is a threat to our national security. Therefore, a transition to a new model of economic growth and development of Russian society as a whole is needed.

One of the directions for the transition to such a model was an ambitious state program of innovative development, until the end of which there are six years left. With the financing of the military-industrial complex (DIC) in the amount of 26 trillion rubles. before 2020, 1,5 should appear in thousand of critical technologies. However, the creation of exclusive rights to use intellectual property requires new laws, regulatory documents, management schemes and, finally, the commercial interest of participants in the process.

ONLY ONE PERCENT

The complex of tasks that was voiced in the speeches of the Russian president is designated by a single and succinct definition - “modernization”. The scientific community, the political leadership of the country, the economic bloc of the Russian government have announced its re-industrialization as the base trend of the modernization of the Russian economy - that is, new industrialization based on the latest technological structure.

If you look at the situation in the military-industrial complex from this side, then, according to the scientific director of the PRUE. G.V. Plekhanov Sergey Valentey, she looks not the best way. “Today, virtually no intellectual property is produced in the defense industry,” he says. The solution of this problem is prevented by at least several groups of factors.

First of all, it is a deformed structure of the economy. During the period from 1990 to 2012, the share of basic industries of reindustrialization - mechanical engineering and metalworking - in the total volume of industrial production fell almost twice.

Secondly, it is a low level of wages in industry and, as a result, personnel “hunger”. The wage situation provokes a rejection on the citizens of proposals to go to work in industry. The depth of the personnel crisis is best illustrated by the low passing scores in a number of technical universities of the country.

Third, the spatial overconcentration of intellectual property holders, inherited from the USSR by Russia, has a no less serious negative impact on the use of intellectual property in the civilian-industrial complex. The bulk of the “intellectuals” are concentrated in seven regions: Moscow, St. Petersburg, as well as in Moscow, Kaluga, Nizhny Novgorod, Novosibirsk and Tomsk regions.

Fourth, many intellectual property items have been lost. During the period of market reforms, opportunities for using the potential of the defense industrial complex in the interests of the development of civilian sectors of the economy were dealt the most significant blow. Its cause is the unresolved problem of ownership of intellectual capital. Although the total value of such property, created by the Soviet defense industry and illegally sold to third countries, is estimated by experts at 8 billion dollars.

Overcoming the impact of the first three factors should be sought not within the MIC itself, but in the development of a strategy for the re-industrialization of the entire Russian economy. This strategy, among other things, will have to take into account the peculiarities of the spatial distribution of carriers of “intellectual capital”. For example, by forming clusters according to the type of Dubninsky (in Dubna near Moscow), using the remaining human potential of a number of single-industry towns, etc.

As for the loss of intellectual property objects of the defense industry, we need to start with its protection, since the entire volume of protected intellectual property in Russia today does not exceed 1%.

The demand for research and development, according to theory, determines their supply. But in Russia this rule does not work. For example, with the obviously growing demand in the domestic market for high-tech consumer goods and services, domestic producers practically do not supply them with it. The reason is that there is no means or interest to use their intellectual property for the purposes of their own innovative modernization. But in this case, they will not be interested in the innovative modernization of civilian sectors of the economy.

According to Alexander Kashirin, Deputy Chairman of the NTS of the Rostec Group of Companies, all these processes impede the development of our military-industrial complex. The management of the rights of the Russian Federation to the results of intellectual activities of civil, military, special and dual use is carried out by government customers on the basis of rules approved by government decree. This implies the implementation of a number of activities: state accounting of the results of R & D, R & D, evaluation of their value, disposal of rights to use. At the same time, within the framework of the state defense order (GOZ) exclusive rights to the results of intellectual activity (RID) are assigned to the state customer.

Moreover, the nomenclature of general business expenses was approved. In accordance with it, a serial manufacturer has the right to charge depreciation of intangible assets involved in the production process. If these intangible assets were not created at the expense of the means of the serial manufacturer, they cannot be on its balance sheet. This is a key position. At the moment, when securing such rights to a state customer, the developer of military equipment is not interested in creating objects of such property, since it is not possible to consolidate the rights to them in accordance with the established procedure. Rights to them are not made out by either the developer or the customer. This fact is the reason that intangible assets are not taken into account both on the developer’s balance sheet and on the state customer’s balance sheet. Consequently, when forming the price of military products, it is impossible to take into account payments.

There is a need to change the existing intellectual property management system, while respecting the interests of both the state customer and the IWT developer and their serial manufacturer. The Ministry of Industry and Trade has now adopted the practice of assigning exclusive rights to the results of intellectual activity to the developer. This makes it possible to maintain a balance of interests of all actors. The developer will receive security documents and will not be divorced from the results of intellectual activity. Manufacturer - the ability to take into account the amount of payments for the development of new products. State customer - competitive products in their use.

RIGHT TO PATENT

We live in an age when many processes are controlled by what is called money. The state customer pays and has the right to reed, but intellect suffers from this. It turns out that the intellect does not have the right to work (the product) that it itself creates. And while the money will be at the forefront, nothing will change.

This order of things must be changed. That is, to enable the intellect to use its intellectual property. But even at the government level, no one will commercialize the development that the inventor has created. There is no such goal and task. Therefore, it is necessary to transfer such rights to the developer as much as possible so that he could at least later have his commercial interest. Figuratively speaking, the state can and should think about how to grant patents to authors and enterprises free of charge.

In the meantime, according to Maxim Dyshlyuk, General Director of the National Center for Intellectual Capital LLC, the same Ministry of Defense requires transferring intellectual property from enterprises when signing contracts for the manufacture of weapons and military equipment. Enterprises run up. As a result, it happens that the production remains without an order, and the Ministry of Defense - without weapons and equipment.

The lack of demand for Russian scientific research in the interests of modernizing domestic production has led to the fact that our degree of import dependence has grown to a critical level in all basic industries. And the implementation of the tasks of innovation development according to these indicators, oddly enough, for now fixes a course towards strengthening import dependence in all the basic sectors of the economy. In any case, without taking into account the level of commercialization of exclusive rights to these technical solutions, this only leads to imitation of activity (in terms of the number of applications for obtaining a patent and the patents themselves). That does not meet the national interests of Russia and the tasks of re-industrialization of the national industry mainly based on domestic technologies.

The legal vacuum pushes other right holders even to violations. According to the Prosecutor General’s Office of Russia, in the 2013 year, only for the main models of weapons and military equipment, about 90 state contracts were not executed, the advance payments of which amounted to 80%. And in the USC and the KLA, about 60 criminal cases are being investigated, the damage from which, according to preliminary estimates, is about 20 billion rubles.

In the Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation dated December 12 on 2013, Vladimir Putin noted that “today, on average, we have only one of the obtained scientific results of 265 becoming the object of legal protection. The contribution of value added, which is formed from the turnover of intellectual property, in Russia's GDP is less than 1%. This is not just a little, it is very little. In the USA, this indicator is 12%, in Germany - 7 – 8, in Finland - 20 ”.

The structure of R & D expenditures in the last 20 years in Russia has also not changed significantly: more than 3 / 4 is the budget, 1 / 4 is the private sector. While abroad, the proportion is inverse. Enterprises have been and remain the main customers of R & D abroad (69% in the USA, 64% in the EU, and 62% in China).

Not very high and the effectiveness of research. In a single federal database of R & D conducted in the Russian Federation from 1982 to 1 in January 2014, about 1,2 million research and development projects are registered. Of these, 90 857 was conducted during the 2011 – 2013 period. But according to the results of their implementation, only 13 713 RNTD was registered, that is - one (!) Obtained result of intellectual activity for seven R & D.

In the unified registry of RID military, special and dual use (in Rospatent) there are more than 18 thousand RID, including the Ministry of Defense - 11,5 thousand, Roscosmos - 4 thousand, FSTEC - 800, MIA - 700, MPTR - 500. However, in practice, in many cases, scientific, technical and design documentation that does not belong to the objects of intellectual property is reflected as objects of such accounting under the guise of REED. And how is the information on the material carrier from 1 January 2008 of the year excluded from the composition of objects of civil rights and, therefore, can not be the object of civil circulation.

As reported in the inspection materials of the Prosecutor General’s Office of Russia (this was mentioned in the conference materials), the Ministry of Industry and Trade has mastered enormous funds allocated by the state, but the tasks for developing and implementing advanced technologies and developing the scientific and intellectual potential of the aviation and shipbuilding industries have not been resolved. For example, in 2011 – 2013, 133 billion rubles was spent on R & D projects in the field of aircraft and shipbuilding, the ministry concluded more than 500 government contracts, but the result was only 93 patented by OIC. The results obtained are not comparable with the resources spent, and none of the inventions are used by the state. Or this figure: out of 270, thousands of existing Russian patents are sold for less than 2%, which is not beneficial either to the right holders or to Russia.

Inclusion in the practice of innovation activities of the results of intellectual activity, exclusive rights to them requires the development and application of new approaches and the creation of systems for identifying, minimizing and managing risks in the field of intellectual property. Including when attracting investments in innovative projects using scientific and scientific-technical developments.

What measures are seen as paramount in this situation?

A necessary and indispensable condition for success in the development of the intellectual property economy is effective state regulation, which involves the following activities in this area:

- state strategy of innovative development through the intellectual property market;

- centralized horizontally and vertically system of state administration of processes in the field of intellectual property in order to reduce administrative barriers to market development;

- a system of accounting for R & D and distribution of exclusive rights to the results of intellectual activity obtained with budget financing;

- a system of indicators and indicators for assessing the performance of science and the fulfillment of government contracts;

- management of state rights to the results of intellectual activity;

- development of a system of legal regulation and the creation of uniform rules - standards for the formation, circulation (commercialization), protection of intellectual property;

- government stimulation and provision of innovative motivation of the balance of interests; author – co-executive – customer with R & D budgeting;

- Competent authority and trained cadres of professional intermediaries in the field of law, economics and intellectual property management (at the rate of one intermediary for 10 researchers);

- a system of effective legal protection, control and supervision in the field of intellectual property.

REQUIRED MEASURES

The effectiveness of budget financing of R & D is still at a low level here. At the same time, there are no effective mechanisms for managing the rights of the state to the results of intellectual activity obtained with budget financing. Despite the decisions of the Russian government No. 233 of 22 March 2012 of the year and No. 458 of 30 of May 2013 of the year, the rules for managing the rights of the state to the results of intellectual activity approved by them for state customers still do not work.

In these conditions, for the use of RIDs in the performance of state contracts under the State Defense Order and military-technical cooperation, an urgent inventory is needed to identify and register the rights of the Russian Federation to the RID contained in the documentation used and (or) created during the execution of government contracts. At the same time, it is urgent to develop and adopt mechanisms for disposing of the rights of the state to the RID, including the procedure for alienation and inclusion in the authorized capital, the transfer of pledged exclusive rights to such RID.

In this regard, we need a unified methodology and mechanisms for assessing the effectiveness of Russian science and the effectiveness of implementing state innovation development programs from the standpoint of a strategic audit and an audit of the economic performance of the intellectual property economy (including the creation of added value, capitalization of intangible assets and investment).

Among the priority measures to change the situation in this area are the following:

- it is necessary to increase the role of the ministries responsible for the real sector of the economy in regulating budget financing in the interests of the re-industrialization of the national industry. More actively involve enterprises in determining the scope of state orders for the development of innovative technologies necessary for the modernization of production and re-industrialization (interest in co-financing). Reduce the level of corruption through the adoption and introduction of anti-corruption standards in the placement of state orders for research and development and the purchase of imported technologies and equipment;

- to secure property rights to the RID for the R & D performer (enterprise) received with budget financing, on the basis of the reasoned use of the RID in the production of final “dual” and civil purposes, to ensure a balance of interests between the author, co-executor and customer;

- the ordering of the rights to use within the framework of the state defense order and the military-technical cooperation institute, previously obtained during the fulfillment of the state order (Ministry of Protorg of Russia, Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Roskosmos and Rosatom State Corporation) can also play a role

- development of methodology and methodologies for selecting the results of intellectual activity obtained in the framework of budget financing of R & D and evaluation of rights to them, for subsequent transfer from the government customer to the performer of these R & D; carrying out comprehensive expertise (economic, legal, technological) in the supply of imported equipment and technology; standardization of procedures and rules in the field of management, use and protection of intellectual property in the defense industry;

- it is possible and necessary to include intellectual property in the price structure of innovative products in the state order (including within the framework of the state defense order and military-technical cooperation), provided that the cost of innovative products is preserved (reduced). Improving credit conditions, taxation when using intellectual property in innovation processes and projects will also play a role;

- training in the field of economics, law and management of intellectual property in the Russian military-industrial complex on the basis of state and corporate orders.

All these measures can lead out of the innovation deadlock in which many branches of Russia find themselves. The main thing - do not hesitate with making decisions.
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    6 December 2014 18: 47
    The author watch the film "Genius". What is the relation to inventors! Many toilets are covered with patents.
    This is the attitude of the state and companies (enterprises), you need to spend money on modernization. How come !!! Wait a minute! Yes you go!
    Change your attitude; no one will sell patents abroad.
    1. +1
      6 December 2014 19: 01
      Quote: langeron
      The author watch the film "Genius". What is the relation to inventors! Many toilets are covered with patents.
      This is the attitude of the state and companies (enterprises), you need to spend money on modernization. How come !!! Wait a minute! Yes you go!
      Change your attitude; no one will sell patents abroad.


      What are you allowing yourself ?! Above everything is more visible! We are nobody below, and our opinion is already pasting the toilets! Right now the Giant of Thoughts will come and explain everything to you!
      1. +4
        6 December 2014 19: 35
        I'm already here, it’s not good that they’re already scaring me. But seriously, the short-sighted policy of our liberal governments has brought our economy to an unsatisfactory state, to put it mildly, almost all sectors of the national economy have somehow survived, and some have safely rested, while everything has not been lost, we must urgently change the country's economic course, and the current government is urgently resigning, otherwise an economic collapse awaits us, the anaconda stranglehold is designed for a long period.
        1. -1
          6 December 2014 20: 19
          The Giant of Thoughts once again discovered America, but expressed its discovery in twice bigger form. Progress, however. wassat Just a little bit - and completely corrected. wassatAnd at the same time he will tell us how the Volga flows into the Caspian Sea. wassat
          1. 0
            7 December 2014 12: 23
            Who minus me? Giant Ali his fans? wassat
        2. 0
          8 December 2014 21: 00
          will wait for economic collapse !?
          but what does it mean now that it doesn’t mean collapse?
          50% depreciation of the national currency under commodity exporters
          drop in truck sales
          electricity sales drop
          projected 15 decline (in fact already underway)
          We are already collapsing!
          I'm afraid that the resignation of the government will no longer help. For an innovative breakthrough, it is not enough for us to change the economic course - we need to change the country's governance system. A direct presidential rule is possible in which the parliament (in general the time-tested parliamentary monarchy) would limit the actions of the President could save the situation (with a fundamental change in tax policy), of course, with the transfer of the capital to the center of the country and the creation in Moscow for all current officials working in it , settled areas (let the small-town traditions continue). With the existing corrupt power system, no reform options will be transitional; they will turn any sensible undertakings into cancer theft, like cancer cells.
          But the GDP will not do this, in his last message he clearly said that he really can’t decide anything. Because it is not clear why there was not a single hint that the government, which openly put on the country (including its decrees), would remain as an unpleasant memory with such an attitude to the interests of the people.
    2. Denis fj
      +4
      6 December 2014 20: 11
      The formation of an economy of leadership and innovation is the only way to achieve ambitious goals: to ensure a high standard of living for the population, and to consolidate the role of a global leader for the country, ministry officials write. In the meantime, Russia can hardly be called the forerunner of an innovative breakthrough: the government has already adopted a strategy for the development of science and technology of the country until 2015, but less than a third of the planned indicators have been achieved.
      The demand for innovations remains low, which also has an inefficient structure: a bias towards the purchase of finished equipment abroad to the detriment of introducing its own new developments. The balance of payments for technologies was positive in 2000 ($ 20 million), and in 2009 amounted to minus $ 1000,8 million. Leading countries in the field of innovation at the same time increased the surplus of the technological balance: the United States - 1,5 times, Great Britain - 1,9 times, and Japan - 2,5 times. In the crisis, tens of billions of dollars were invested in the development of medicine, biotechnology, alternative energy, the nuclear industry, and information technology. Such powerful financial injections can bring a change in technological mode for 3-5 years, the document says. Russian state regulation is so far characterized by rather hostility towards business, officials of the Ministry of Economic Development write, and tax and customs administration are repressive in nature. State power is not innovative and has not achieved significant success in creating an innovative climate, they conclude.
    3. +2
      7 December 2014 03: 34
      Even Putin admitted that it was necessary to change the economic model of the state. And where is the copyright?
      1. 0
        8 December 2014 16: 41
        For example, if R&D is carried out under a government order, then the state is the owner of the newly created intellectual product ("intangible asset"), which reduces the interest of the scientist / designer in the quality of his development.
        And sometimes it happens that it is more profitable for the author to show the state the absence of the result of the work, and then to blame it on the West and there it is very profitable to push this "intangible asset". Such is the form of "wholesale and retail trade in the Motherland"
  2. +7
    6 December 2014 18: 50
    In patents in the first place the ownership of the invention. The creative person is least concerned about this. In the USSR, everything was simpler. The state has the right to own property, and a person is honored, respected and has a bonus of 25-50 rubles.
    1. +2
      7 December 2014 09: 33
      Quote: RESEARCHER
      The creative person is least concerned about this

      I will support.
      If this invention is so important for the state and industry as a whole, let the state keep it secret, organize production and receive some dividends with the inventor from the sale of finished products on this topic. Why some time? Yes, just no one in the world today, by and large, will not reckon with patents in serious areas. Look at China, but at the same Samsung, which has endless showdowns with Apple. So what? Yes, just people do what makes good money.
      Comes to funny. After leaving the army, I work at an enterprise where one of the areas is production of products for high-quality road construction, in particular geogrid. Not so long ago it turned out that in our country the only patent holder for this elementary design is a company that does not even have its own production base. with all this, the patent holder is an American. This is akin to having someone in the head file a patent for a wheel. And now what? Selling your products to this company and without hitting a finger will it resell it for the development of the network of our roads? Or build in the old way, without getting involved in a legal showdown?
      And I have heard about innovations and modernization in our country from those in power since the 90s. Only here things are there. For some reason, a course has been taken that a good uncle will come from behind a hill and will establish innovations and modernization at our enterprise. they completely forgot about their manufacturers.
  3. +3
    6 December 2014 18: 51
    Author watch the film "Genius"

    Or "Loch Lord of the Waters" ....
    And do not hint that this ignoramus, the dumb head Chew-Bays, again allocated 100 lards to his nunotechnology. And he sawed them!
    1. +2
      7 December 2014 02: 05
      Ange broke his hands ...
      So sawed ...
      Maybe sawed already ...
      At last...
  4. +5
    6 December 2014 18: 55
    The article is designed for specialists? Things were written well-known before the primitive. But I read it two times. I understood that it is impossible to embrace the immensity .. Kozma Prutkov was right.
    From the position of an official from the defense industry, everything is true. But what gave this new promo? It’s new. And not the development that has already been invented? Nothing ...
    And at the same time, old Pinocchio and now terror in the head and legs of the enemy instills .. I can’t even say Solncepeke (but this is the brainchild of the corporation) ..
    It seems to me that now, along with what the author offers, our kulibins and illiterate students need to pay great attention (for now) ... Fresh brains that are not dusted with dogma often give such an idea that the Earth is swaying. How many Jules Verne predicted inventions there? More hundreds ... And most of them are already working. And in his time it was not even scientific, but simply fantastic ...
    1. +4
      7 December 2014 01: 28
      Quote: domokl
      .How many Jules Verne predicted inventions? More than a hundred ... And most of them are already working


      Science fiction is good for training the mind. But what you cannot do without is modern, high-tech machine tool construction. In the days of the USSR, we produced excellent (by that time) machine tools, and now the entire machine park is purchased over the hill (for dollars). You cannot blind a complex microcircuit without a good automatic machine. Well, to carefully grow good brains for your country, and not for "London" and "Paris". Yes
    2. Trolley
      0
      9 December 2014 14: 31
      Quote: domokl
      . Fresh brains that are not dusted with dogma often give such a walk that the Earth sways.

      Yes, here in the process of reading the article, the discovery was made: abbreviations like RID do not accelerate the understanding of the text, but rather slow down, although developing intuition in an attempt to guess what was meant ...
      The earth is still not very swaying, but in one tavern a light bulb sways and illustrates the essence of the universe and the general field theory ... only everyone looks at the plate, most do not need it.
  5. +11
    6 December 2014 19: 13
    when I hear the word "innovation", the voucher genius and the prime minister of the Russian Federation come to mind laughing
    1. +4
      6 December 2014 19: 50
      For Russia, at the moment, the most urgent issue is the organization of a normal secondary higher education, in particular in grades for knowledge, and not for money.
      1. 0
        8 December 2014 16: 49
        For comprador export of raw materials (essentially, valve control), a well-developed system of higher education is absolutely optional - these are our liberals who are ruining this system from the 90s to the present.
  6. +5
    6 December 2014 19: 26
    Administrative measures will not break the R&D deadlock. "... the development of methodology and methods for selecting the results of intellectual activity ..." - sounds beautiful and scientific - and that's all! It all depends on the creation of conditions for scientific and technical creativity. Creativity is carried out by scientists who explore the unknown and engineers who create something new (often from what is available!). Therefore, it is to these people that all attention should be drawn, all everyday problems should be solved, they should feel in demand and receive a reward worthy of their creations. Moreover, creativity cannot be normalized. A clever thought, an insight can appear, take shape within a week or a year, or a five-year period. The main thing is the result, the consequences. How can this be achieved? The simplest thing is to raise the salaries of scientists and engineers by 3-4 times! Minimum! Plus bonuses for implementation in production, design support, etc. After all, it has come to the point that at defense enterprises, engineers receive a salary of 8-10 thousand rubles! Zhvanetsky said in this regard: "They pretend to be paid a salary, and we pretend to work." Does this state of affairs suit anyone? This crap has been going on for a century, since the proletariat was declared the most class-conscious class. And nothing will change from lamentations. Word - and deed!
    1. +5
      7 December 2014 01: 55
      Quote: Iglu40
      It all depends on the creation of conditions for scientific and technical creativity. Creativity is carried out by scientists who study the unknown and engineers who create something new (often from what is available!).

      Correctly! The example of the activities of Leslie Groves in the Manhattan project and L.P. Beria at the creation of our bomb.
      Quote: Iglu40
      Clever thought, insight can appear, take shape within a week or a year, or five years. The main thing is the result, the consequences. How to achieve this? The simplest thing is to raise the salaries of scientists and engineers 3-4 times! Minimum! Plus bonuses for implementation in production, design support, etc.

      My supervisor liked to repeat: "Even if you get rich with gold, he will not be the first to reach the finish line!" Money, no doubt, is important. But clever heads are most important! People who think outside the box, "eccentrics" with transcendental ideas ...
      Under the "head" you need to give money, and not under a team of close-knit like-minded people, without a divine spark in the head.
      And secondly, you need to look for talents, starting with school competitions in physics, chemistry, mathematics. To select and train them in special boarding-incubators, to nurture, like native children. The creation of a scientific school is the work of the lights of our science, and not the professors of universities and institutes of the middle hand. Then it will be possible to talk about the results, and not sigh about the wasted means.
      IMHO.
  7. +4
    6 December 2014 19: 53
    As it was reported in the materials of the inspection of the Prosecutor General of Russia (this was stated in the conference materials), the Ministry of Industry and Trade mastered the enormous funds allocated by the state, however, the tasks of developing and implementing advanced technologies, developing the scientific and intellectual potential of the aircraft and shipbuilding industries have not been resolved

    Someone went to saw wood in the north of Russia? Or did someone lose a warm chair? Well, at least a reprimand with an entry?
    We continue to allocate money and be surprised that nothing happens ...
  8. +4
    6 December 2014 20: 00
    What innovative breakthrough are you talking about when, after the collapse of the USSR, mass privatization began and all the machines were cut? It is not necessary to deal with innovations, but the restoration of the criminally utilized industry for independent production within the country. And you need to start with the most important element - the machine. And then on this machine to make new, improved machines. And to make parts on machines for new factories, equipment, mechanisms that have already been invented or can be invented by scientists. But for scientists to work, one thing is needed - financing and incentive. When you will receive decent money for your labors, and your labors will work for the good of the country, everything will work. And when nobody needs your work in the camp, no innovation will help. Everything is bought ready for the hill for oil loot. The oligarchy does not know how to live tomorrow. Benefit with a minimum of money and time. Only here and now. After all, they can even beat ...
  9. +3
    6 December 2014 20: 02
    "We need an innovative breakthrough"
    Why do the same thing? Even the horse understands what is needed!
    1. +3
      6 December 2014 20: 30
      Yes, the fetus overrides, and the new one when it appears. Tired of talkers read. Breakthroughs, innovations all this is useless. Money and power make people lazy and stupid.
    2. +1
      7 December 2014 01: 37
      Quote: Bayonet
      Even the horse understands what is needed!


      The horse understands, he is big, but for some reason our rulers do not understand (or there is a BIG-BIG SECRET) that while the Chubais (florists in the past) will be in charge of this innovative leap, instead of a jerk we will get a "bunch". stop
  10. +5
    6 December 2014 20: 15
    The government should be professional and to some extent technocratic, rather than legal and economic.
  11. +1
    6 December 2014 21: 00
    And who will be engaged in innovations? The head of the research institute (academician) - deputy (son-proffessor) - zavlab (granddaughter-doctor) - senior scientist (nephew candidate)? + Uncle in the ministry ?! But really smart people - either over a hill, or write articles + in co-authors of all of the above. But babloooo + experience goes !!!!! belay
  12. +1
    6 December 2014 21: 37
    So I ask myself a question, and what do the authorities and the government don’t know all this, I think they know why they’re not doing it, why the President doesn’t ask them, why the May decrees have not been fulfilled for more than 2 years, why people who have not fulfilled these decrees still work in government, etc. The answer here is that there will not be any unity with these people and we won’t carry out any new reindustrialization, they simply fail, ruin and plunder. They don’t know how to do anything else. We’ll see in two years.
  13. 0
    6 December 2014 22: 21
    An interesting opinion of members of the forum:
    http://www.zavtra.ru/content/view/ne-v-konya-korm/
  14. +9
    6 December 2014 22: 29
    in childhood, I was always sincerely surprised by the films of the USSR, where workers after the shift went to LEARN belay
    I considered this propaganda, and then I talked with my grandfather - the chief technologist of the military-industrial complex of the plant, and he explained ...

    decisions of government officials
    under Stalin engineer earned 10-15 times more than a worker
    under Khrushchev Engineer began to earn 4-7 times more
    under Brezhnev 1-2 engineer earnings from a worker
    under Yeltsin engineer income less than worker income
    under Putin ... whoa, are there any engineers alive?


    nothing needs to be invented - we want industrialization, so we must do it like Stalin!
    1. +2
      7 December 2014 01: 43
      Quote: SmileSimple
      nothing needs to be invented - we want industrialization, so we must do it like Stalin!


      Absolutely right. To be a GOOD engineer must be prestigious and highly paid (however, as well as a skilled worker).
    2. 0
      8 December 2014 16: 56
      Quote: SmileSimple
      when Brezhnev engineer earnings 1-2 from the worker

      You are not entirely accurate - the ratio is the other way around, so in the 70s there was such a personnel problem that engineers (designers and technologists) massively switched to high-level workers. They even shot documentaries about this ...
  15. +4
    7 December 2014 01: 01
    No jerks (especially innovative ones!) Can be dreamed of or talked about, until the preparation of the engineering corps of Russia is revived !!!
  16. 0
    7 December 2014 02: 17
    The idea is not new - war is war.
    Due to the fact that there are a lot of forests in Russia
    Print nemereno dollars and euros,
    Well, what is the Fed rich in there ...
    And dispel them over the inhabited areas of the planet ...
    So that every beggar has a millionaire
    And in return, let them also try to print oil, gas, titanium, uranium ...
    and other currency of the Russian Federation
  17. +3
    7 December 2014 10: 32
    The momentary jerk is needed for officials to justify their existence. Industrial power is not created in jerks. This is the result of a consistent and continuous forward movement. Here is another planned brilliant breakthrough.
    http://vpk.name/news/122316_sdelannyie_za_rubezhom_mikroshemyi_oficialno_priznay
    ut_otechestvennyimi.html
  18. +1
    8 December 2014 09: 56
    Until it changes .. that the ARTICLE-will not be!
  19. 0
    8 December 2014 22: 37
    I was listening to Putin on TV right now. He said that if it is possible to buy it abroad, we will buy it, and if not, we will substitute import, we will do it ourselves. So, reservations have already gone, they were already in the message. They produce everything abroad - let's not produce anything, as before! We have been doing this for 23 years, but oil costs $ 66, what will the salaries be paid? But what if, if you start industrialization, a new elite will appear, but with the old "native", what to do? You saw at the message of "these nestlings" in the hall, something does not inspire ...
  20. Trolley
    0
    9 December 2014 15: 55
    In the Russian Federation, scientists do not correspond to the current situation - they are not universal enough.
    In developed countries, government agencies correspond to their functions - the police, the court, the patent office, and scientists can work in a narrow specialization and achieve success.
    In the USSR, too, Beria, Korolev, Malyshev corresponded to their functions, and engineers drew.
    In the Russian Federation, the police only differ in form from the bandits, among family officials abroad, managers are looking for a pullback ... and therefore, a modern Russian inventor must combine Beria, Malyshev, Korolev, have Soros’s finances and Bond’s luck - as soon as at least one such case appears will go on well.
    The second condition - a serious technique is not done for an idle rabble - you need a real ideology, not a propaganda splinter - reasonable people will not make grenades to monkeys.
    The third is modern society. Thanks to the stucco culture, people do not trust each other, and teamwork, like in Japan or the Reich, is impossible, and without faithful like-minded people, serious things cannot be done - so society must be changed.
    That's all - another state, ideology, people.