Military Review

Modest Kolerov: Heirs of Hitler’s allies, the USA, nationalists and “de-Stalinizers” in the EU are preparing “Nuremberg” against Russia

30
Modest Kolerov: Heirs of Hitler’s allies, the USA, nationalists and “de-Stalinizers” in the EU are preparing “Nuremberg” against Russia

In accordance with the decision of the European Parliament, 23 on August 2011, on the anniversary of the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact between Germany and the USSR, the Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Totalitarianism was first celebrated in the EU countries. The Warsaw Conference of EU Ministers of Justice was held in Warsaw, the Warsaw Declaration was adopted. The US Embassy in Estonia placed equal responsibility for the start of the Second World War on Hitler Germany and the USSR. The candidate answers the questions of IA REGNUM historical Sciences Modest Kolerov:


Why does the EU commemorate the victims of totalitarianism alone, without remembering the victims of democracy and authoritarianism, fascism and militarism?

If the decision of the European Parliament to establish the Day of Remembrance for the Victims of Totalitarianism still contained deaf reservations that, apart from totalitarian regimes on the eve of World War II, there were unnamed authoritarian regimes, under which, at the cost of additional explanatory efforts, it is possible to legitimately bring regimes in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Hungary Italy, Romania, Poland, whose practice can also be condemned and whose victims should be mentioned, in the Warsaw Declaration of 23 in August 2011, the Russian translation of which is published An REGNUM news agency explicitly states only totalitarianism: "Europe suffered under totalitarian regimes, regardless of whether it was communism, national socialism or any other ... totalitarian regimes are responsible for most of the shameful acts of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. .. the perpetrators will be brought to justice ... call upon the European network of contact points for persons responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes to consider the issue of crimes committed by totalitarian regimes. " From this formula it follows that the allies of Hitler in these countries and the countries themselves are responsible for the genocide, etc., and even more so the allies of Hitler at the head of Finland, Spain, Portugal, France, and even more so the democratic authorities of England, France, USA who directly supported Hitler in his aggression to the East, in the direction of the USSR, are not subject to the declaration and the European Union justice.

In addition, the declaration directly sets the task, for the sake of execution of which, in fact, this whole game was started on Memorial Day: "true reconciliation (someone with whom is shyly silent, because this is about" reconciliation "of the EU with the enemy in the person of the USSR and Russia) which is the burden of the entire Soviet legacy - MK) is impossible without sincere and careful discussion and without the establishment of justice. " It is precisely the “justice” that the EU Ministers of Justice intend to establish. Not foreign ministers, not ministers of culture, but ministers of justice who frankly prepare and will prepare in union and absolute agreement with the Russian "pre-Stalinization" inquisition the new "Nuremberg process" now over Russia - which will certainly be awarded not only a large-scale reconciliation "with those with whom in the current EU she did not fight, but also large-scale reparations for the crimes of Stalinism, for the very existence of the USSR as a state, for the struggle of the USSR against Hitler’s democratic and authoritarian allies. And that means - it forces Russia to make political “reconciliation” with those on whose behalf the EU, it turns out, is speaking with Hitler’s allies. It is very important to understand that by setting the condition for “reconciliation” of the USSR / Russia with the EU countries, the European Union directly declares itself the heir of Hitler’s democratic and authoritarian allies, from which modern regimes directly and publicly conduct their genetics in modern countries in those countries whose representatives gathered in Warsaw 23 August 2011, celebrated Memorial Day and signed the Warsaw Declaration - the program of the new Nuremberg.

They are the heirs of Hitler's ally Admiral Horthy - in Hungary, they are the heirs of the semi-fascist regimes of Smetona, Ulmanis, Päts - in Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, they are the heirs of the genocidal Hitler protectorate - in the EU accession Croatia, they are the heirs of Hitler's genocidal ally Marshal Antonescu - Romania, the heirs of Hitler’s “neutral” ally — in Sweden, which until the year 1976 practiced compulsory “sterilization” for political reasons, but not condemned and punished by the EU, are the heirs of Hitler’s protest Oratov - in Slovakia, the heirs of the nationalist repressive dictatorship Marshal Pilsudski -. Poland, etc. This is the heir of democratic Czechoslovakia, to exterminate cultural and political rights of Rusyns and implement large-scale and bloody ethnic cleansing against millions of Sudeten Germans. These are the heirs of General Franco in Spain, whose hundreds of thousands of victims are still in Spain - after the formal "reconciliation" - is not very common to say.

One must be a Russian idiot, “de-Stalinizing”, of modern Russia, or just a cynic and a traitor, in order not to “understand”: the ministers of justice of these New Europe countries are the direct nationalist and “democratic” heirs of Hitler's allies and collaborators. They did not, do not, and will not put before themselves questions of reconciliation, justice and retribution, for example, King Juan Carlos for the crimes of Franco, Benes, Pilsudski, Horthy, Mussolini, Chamberlain, Daladier, Mannerheim, Antonescu, Smetona , Ulmanisa, Patsa and others, whose "legitimacy" and legitimacy they strengthen their modern apartheid and selective, initially politically and economically motivated "memory policy". They will not introduce legal sanctions against those who praise and diminish the crimes of all these figures, they will not judge those who, executing their decisions, made millions of people in Europe victims of crime. All of these countries and regimes have not responded, are not responsible, and will not be responsible for their participation in the Holocaust, in the rarest cases limiting themselves with protocol apologies, and not realizing "justice" and "justice." I’m not even talking about that - even joining the EU - Croatia did not respond and is not responsible for the genocide of the Serbs, which it created during the Second World War.

What was the nature of the political regimes of Central and Eastern Europe in the 1930-1940 years that the USSR faced at its western borders?

As I have already said, in the person of Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, the USSR dealt with nationalist dictatorships that carried out assimilation and anti-Semitic policies and therefore became Hitler’s natural allies, and won with the help of mass firing terror in civil war. in Finland, a regime that had stable imperialist territorial claims against the USSR.

What goals were pursued by these regimes in relation to the USSR?

The common goal of these regimes was the destruction of the USSR, the dismemberment of its territory, the redistribution of its resources among themselves. Such a goal was pursued by those who, at the head of the United States, Britain and France, pushed Hitler and the countries of Eastern Europe into a war against the USSR.

What political device was planned to be implemented by national movements, in the 1940-ies. who fought for independence from the USSR?

Only the state propaganda of the EU and the USA and the Russian official historian Chubaryan argue that the Second World War began with a non-aggression pact between Germany and the USSR 1939. Any researcher and student who does not seek personal profit in the accusation of the USSR knows: the division of Europe with Hitler, the "appeasement" of the aggressor at the expense of adjacent territories in the direction to the East, to the USSR, the division of neighboring countries with Hitler began Poland, Hungary, England, France and the USA. The Anschluss of Austria and the Munich Agreement of 1938, which dismembered Czechoslovakia, followed the apogee of their alliance with Hitler, after which any Stalinist foreign policy efforts of the USSR were attempts to postpone Hitler’s attack on the USSR and industrial centers, to avoid war on two fronts - with Germany and allied Japan (whose crimes, by the way, the EU does not "geographically" notice, but it is perfectly reconciled with the "European" pretensions of the countries of the Middle East her Asia).

What political device was planned to be implemented by national movements, in the 1940-ies. who fought for independence from the USSR?

The nationalist movements in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Ukraine, which fought for independence from the USSR, were by no means accidental allies of Hitler during World War II. Ideologically and practically they built pro-fascist, radical nationalist and anti-Semitic regimes, not only voluntarily participated in the genocide perpetrated by the Nazis, but frankly shared his ideological attitudes. The ideologies of class internationalism in the USSR were opposed not by "European values", which the heirs of these national movements in the Baltic States and Ukraine now swear, but by European Nazism, shared by all these movements. Therefore, only pigs can speak of the “European choice” of this Eastern European fascism, who see in their mirror reflections not the pig's eyes, but “the faces of democracy”.

Separately, it should be said about the ideology of the heirs of Pilsudski in Poland during the Second World War, the London emigre government of Poland and his Army Craiova. Already, their goal to return the 1772 border to Poland in the east clearly proves that they intended to continue the assimilatory, colonialist, nationalist and imperialist practices of Poland against Lithuanians, Belarusians and Ukrainians in their ethnographic territories. Israeli historians are also aware of mass anti-Semitism, which flourished in everyday life and the policy of the Polish army of Anders.

It is noteworthy that the already mentioned Warsaw Declaration prescribes "to support the activities of non-governmental organizations, including organizations from countries covered by the Eastern Partnership, which are actively involved in the study and collection of documentation related to crimes committed by totalitarian regimes." Translated into Russian practical language, this means that the political classes of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, trying, if not to join the EU, then at least feed in the EU, are explicitly stated to collect materials for the indictment of the new Nuremberg process "against Russia. This means that their revisionism, the justification of their Hitlerite collaborationists and the glorification of the “forest brothers”, “legionaries”, Bandera — just because they fought against the USSR — receive not only an indulgence from the EU, but also a direct task of practical Russophobia. Election, anti-Semitic and Russophobic, ie remove the responsibility from their Soviet leaders, national-communist nomenclature suverenizatorov, Kravchuk, Kuchma, yuschenok, Shushkevich, Beria, Demirchian, Shahumyan, Mikoyan Aliyeva Bagirov, Shevardnadze, Snegur Ruutel, Peters, Vacietis, brazauskas, Gorbunovs, etc., and limiting it only to respondents from modern Russia, “de-Stalinization” becomes a direct condition for their integration into the EU, against which “occupation museums” will seem childish prattle.

Why did the EU not condemn the Munich Agreement?

Because the EU as a whole and the ruling regimes especially in the new EU member states are direct heirs of those who concluded this Munich Agreement with Hitler, who were Hitler's ally in World War II, who fought against the anti-Hitler coalition in the ranks of nationalist collaborationist formations.
Originator:
http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1439099.html
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. zczczc
    zczczc 26 August 2011 23: 00 New
    +4
    I think this will be the last day of the EU.

    There is such a law - when any process begins to proceed with quantitative point of view too quickly, then the system loses stability and occurs quality изменение: надобность в процессе отпадает - он заменяется другим процессом или совокупностью других процессов. В обществе это называется "изжить себя".

    Therefore, there is no need to be afraid of this. You just have to wait for the one who blundered it to collapse.

    Why didn’t Germany go down this path in the 30s collapse right away? Because the fast-moving processes were accompanied by structural changes in the state - tightening the belt, ideology, exceptional trust on the part of the people against Hitler, the incredible rise in the military-industrial complex, etc.

    But Germany would collapse, even if it hadn’t attacked anyone, because part of these structural changes were overestimated promises to the people to improve the standard of living, and they demanded unprecedented resources for their replenishment, of which there was nowhere to take especially - so they went to us. And we bent them. If Hitler had been smarter, he himself would have agreed with Stalin on an alliance and a joint redivision of the world. I hope that Stalin would have had the intelligence to take only his own - the Slavic lands in Europe, maybe something else.
  2. zczczc
    zczczc 26 August 2011 23: 10 New
    +2
    Добавлю - вот если подумать, глобальная идея Путина поженить нас на Европе не лишена смысла. Но мне кажется, что в деталях это не разработано и закончится растаскиванием нас на куски. Т.к. управляемость внутри страны близка к фарсу, а "смерть" Европы весьма преувеличена. Чтобы этот план закончился успехом, нам надо, чтобы внутри всё работало как часы (коррупция, управляемость как при Сталине), а Европа скатилась на уровень Албании (безработица, системная дезинтеграция).

    But there is neither one nor the other. Systemic disintegration with us.
    1. SAVA
      SAVA 27 August 2011 01: 56 New
      -2
      zczczc?А ПОЧЕМУ!!???ВЗЯТЬ ТЕХ ЖЕ "МЕНТОВ" ВМЕСТО ТОГО ЧТО БЫ "ЗАТЯНУТЬ ПОЯС" ,ВЗЯТЬ СЕБЯ В РУКИ И БЫТЬ ПРИМЕРОМ МОРАЛЬНОЙ УСТОЙЧИВОСТИ ДЛЯ ОТЧАЯВШИХСЯ ЛЮДЕЙ ЭТИ ТВАРИ ПОЧУЯВ ВСЕДОЗВОЛЕННОСТЬ И ИСПОЛЬЗУЯ СВОЮ ПРОФФЕСИОНАЛЬНУЮ ПОДГОТОВКУ НАОБОРОТ СТАЛИ ВРАГАМИ НАРОДА, И ЭТИМ ВОСПОЛЬЗОВАЛИСЬ ВСЯКОГО РОДА ПОДОНКИ И МРАЗИ И СЕЙЧАС ОНИ ВСЕ ВМЕСТЕ ЖИРУЮТ И ВЕСЕЛЯТСЯ ОБЗЫВАЯ ВСЕХ НОРМАЛЬНЫХ ЛЮДЕЙ "ЛОХАМИ", ОНИ ОКАЗАЛИСЬ СЛАБЫМ ЗВЕНОМ В ГОСУДАРСТВЕ ,ОБ ЭТОМ НАДО ПОМНИТЬ ПРИ УСТРОЙСТВЕ НОВОГО.ДЛЯ НАЧАЛА ОТМЕНИТЬ ИМ ПЕНСИИ И ЗВАНИЯ ПОТОМУ КАК СО СВОИМИ ОБЯЗАННОСТЯМИ ОНИ НЕ СПРАВИЛИСЬ ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВОМ ТОМУ ВЕСЬ БАРДАК КОТОРЫЙ ЛЮДИ ВИДЯТ И БЕЗ МОЕЙ ПОМОЩИ)))
      1. SAVA
        SAVA 28 August 2011 12: 11 New
        0
        I WRITTEN FAULT !! ??? WHY CONS !! ??? Hurt ?? !!! I SAME WRITTEN THUS THOUGHT THOUGHT THOUGHT THOUGHT THOUGHT THOUGHT THOUGHT THOUGHT THOUGHT THOUGHT THOUGHT THOUGHT THINK AND THOUGHT THINK AND THINK ALL THE MINUSES DO NOT DELIVER, SELL YOUR DRUG ONE YOURSELF WITH YOU.
  3. figwam
    figwam 26 August 2011 23: 24 New
    +1
    Oh, they haven’t done a good deed. Fascism is held in high esteem, and the Slavs are like a bone in their throat for them. Well, who can hit on their neck? Only we. The main battle is ahead.
    1. zczczc
      zczczc 26 August 2011 23: 31 New
      +1
      Fascism, Shashism, Zionism, Crusades - all this is a mimicry of the same. At all times, I wanted to create a magical ideology that inspires the masses to the cannibalism of their neighbors. They are deprived, but not suckers, and we ...
    2. His
      His 27 August 2011 13: 27 New
      0
      Hitler dreamed of a united Europe. Now we see her. Another preparation for the crusade to Russia. Again have to learn nemchuru, sluts and other Caucasians
  4. Bern
    Bern 26 August 2011 23: 43 New
    +2
    All this is due to the fact that the EU and the US were afraid, afraid and will be afraid of Russia for a long time! I don’t remember who said - Russians slowly harness, but drive fast!
    1. zczczc
      zczczc 26 August 2011 23: 46 New
      +1
      Bismarck, they say.
      1. His
        His 27 August 2011 14: 01 New
        0
        Bismarck also said that do not think to attack Russia. He was a great man, and most importantly smart.
        1. kripto
          kripto 4 November 2012 09: 41 New
          0
          Here I do not agree with you, it may be quick-witted. It is more appropriate to recall the foreign policy pursued by Chancellor Gorchakov at that time. Without a single shot to restore the status of a Great Power after the Crimean War, you know it is expensive. The same revenge-seekers in Germany still cannot forgive Bismarck that, under Russian pressure, he refused to re-attack France.
  5. Pole
    Pole 26 August 2011 23: 51 New
    +5
    А мы сейчас "интегрируемся в мировое сообщество"... Идеологические ценности нам уж точно не нужны. Все думают о деньгах и о том как пожить получше. Общей идеи нет у нас! Полностью разобщенное государство!
    But an idea is needed !!!
    I did not live very long under the USSR, but I remember a lot - there were no problems about the future, about living space, education, medicine. And now everyone decides these questions for himself, and these questions are at the head of all citizens of the Russian Federation!
    What is it for me?
    And besides, everyone has their own problems, and general ones are discussed only on forums in free 10 minutes, or after a beer.
    Руководство наше также звнято "своими проблемами". На нас сейчас могут гнать почти все, мы "все стерпим". Потому, что нам не до этого всего...
    We’ll crack now, and tomorrow we’ll go denyuzhku earn. And so does everyone, including leadership. It's just that everyone has a different way of earning, and the denyuzhka is different.
    Something needs to be changed ...
    1. figwam
      figwam 27 August 2011 00: 17 New
      +1
      I agree, but there is nothing wrong with making money, we all know that the higher the position in our country, the greater the temptation to theft, we have to fight this. We have a lot of embezzlers, huge corruption, and the current government does not know how to treat it.
      People live under the slogan - eat fat and shit fat, so long the country will not last.
    2. zczczc
      zczczc 27 August 2011 00: 17 New
      +1
      Yeah, but under the Union they were dissatisfied with political information. Probably, many do not know what it is - this is when someone in the classroom, department or workshop prepares a small report for 5 minutes about something related to the situation in the country or the world, and the rest discuss it for another 15 minutes. then study or work.

      Exactly like here on the site!
      1. Pole
        Pole 27 August 2011 00: 40 New
        +1
        Yes, I remember ... More than once he spoke ... But all the speeches were within the framework of ideology ....
        1. zczczc
          zczczc 27 August 2011 01: 03 New
          0
          Speaking beyond ideology is ideological sabotage :)
          1. Pole
            Pole 27 August 2011 01: 11 New
            +2
            Да к чему я - нет общей национальной идеологии! Мы разобщены. У каждого свои интересы. А "общие" представдяет узкий круг людей, которые с обществом не имеют почти ничего общего, кроме гражданства.
            The top will learn something, but we can’t understand anything (for example, the position on Libya). So we guess in the discussions on the forums ...
            1. zczczc
              zczczc 27 August 2011 01: 23 New
              0
              Why do you need ideology? You will poke a little book at a party meeting and ask uncomfortable questions. And so - these are House-2, McDonalds, the credit system - all and ideology at once.
              1. Pole
                Pole 27 August 2011 01: 40 New
                0
                И многих бы "потыкал"... Нет конечно, книжечка не нужна.
                More than 70% of Americans are sure that the state’s foreign policy is absolutely correct.
                In Europe, the same picture.
                How many Russians will say so about Russian politics?
                And why not?
                1. Joker
                  Joker 27 August 2011 01: 48 New
                  0
                  Quote: Pol
                  More than 70% of Americans are sure that the state’s foreign policy is absolutely correct.


                  - I don’t think that at the moment the information is correct, you know the crisis, Europe has the same trouble.
                  1. Pole
                    Pole 27 August 2011 02: 02 New
                    0
                    Well, you can make an adjustment for the crisis, but the difference will be an order of magnitude. We agree 5-10%, against will be about 30-50%, but really do not care will be 90-95%!
                    А пока нам пофигу - руководство будет поступать "на свое усмотрение".
                    And they would shut up their mouths about the Second World War, the Kuril Islands, Ossetia, Abkhazia, put their mouths in the Balts, insist on their interests in Syria, Libya, Iran ....... write and write ....











  6. Foamas
    Foamas 27 August 2011 00: 21 New
    -2
    The author is clearly exaggerating, this is nothing, does not threaten us, let them have fun. Anyway, Modest Kolyarov is a professional propagandist.
  7. SAVA
    SAVA 27 August 2011 02: 13 New
    0
    ВОТ ПУСТЬ ВОЕННЫЕ АНАЛИТИКИ И РАССКАЖУТ " ВОЕННУЮ ТАЙНУ " ЭТИМ НЕДОУМКАМ КОТОРЫЕ ГАВКАЮТ НА БЫВШИЙ СССР,ЕСЛИ ОНИ БУДУТ ВСЕМИ МЕТОДАМИ НА НАС ВОЗДЕЙСТВОВАТЬ ТО ЭТО ПРИВЕДЁТ К ВОЙНЕ ,А ТАК КАК СИСТЕМА ПРО РАЗМЕЩЕНА ЧАСТИЧНО В ЕВРОПЕ ТО ПЕРВЫЕ РАКЕТЫ ( ХВАТИТ И ОДНОЙ)ЛЯГУТ В ТОЧНОСТИ ТУДА ГДЕ ЭТИ НЕДОУМКИ ВЫНАШИВАЮТ СВОИ КРЫСИННЫЕ ПЛАНЫ,КОГДА ЭТО ДО НИХ ДОЙДЕТ ОНИ БУДУТ НЕ ТАКИМИ ПРЫТКИМИ,КСТАТИ ЧТО БЫ НЕ ГОВОРИЛОСЬ ЧТО КТО ТО НАПАЛ НА КОГО ТО, НИКТО ГРАНИЦ НЕ БУДЕТ НАРУШАТЬ, РАКЕТЫ ЛЯГУТ В АКУРАТ НА ГРАНИЦЫ БЫВШЕГО СССР ИМ И ЭТОГО ХВАТИТ А МЫ СПОКОЙНО УЙДЕМ В ГЛУБЬ РОССИИ. ФАНТАСТИКА!! Я БЫ ПОСМОТРЕЛ НА ИХ РОЖИ КОГДА ОНИ ЭТО УСЛЫШАТ)))))))))))
  8. SAVA
    SAVA 27 August 2011 02: 30 New
    0
    А ЧТО БЫ АНГЛОСАКСЫ НЕ ДУМАЛИ ЧТО ОНИ РАЗВЯЖУТ ВОЙНУ НА НАШЕМ КОНТИНЕНТЕ А САМИ ОТСИДЯТСЯ В АВСТРАЛИИ,ТУДА ПЕРЕД НАЧАЛОМ ЗАВАРУШКИ УЙДЕТ ПАРА РПКСН ПОД КОНВОЕМ СТАРЕНЬКИХ "ВИКТОРОВ" И ПО РАЗНЫМ МАРШРУТАМ ,ЧТО БЫ ИСПОРТИТЬ ИМ "ПИР ВО ВРЕМЯ ЧУМЫ",ЭТО ФАНТАЗИЯ НО СНИМИ ИНАЧЕ НЕЛЬЗЯ , ИХНИМ АНАЛИТИКАМ ТАКОГО И В КОШМАРНОМ СНЕ НЕ СНИЛОСЬ))))))))))))))
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 27 August 2011 02: 46 New
      0
      Ага, повальная мобилизация и проведение операции "чистое поле" на европейском ТВД, а перед этим запустить тополь с болванкой по зданию европарламента...
    2. PSih2097
      PSih2097 27 August 2011 07: 16 New
      0
      А ЧТО БЫ АНГЛОСАКСЫ НЕ ДУМАЛИ ЧТО ОНИ РАЗВЯЖУТ ВОЙНУ НА НАШЕМ КОНТИНЕНТЕ А САМИ ОТСИДЯТСЯ В АВСТРАЛИИ,ТУДА ПЕРЕД НАЧАЛОМ ЗАВАРУШКИ УЙДЕТ ПАРА РПКСН ПОД КОНВОЕМ СТАРЕНЬКИХ "ВИКТОРОВ" И ПО РАЗНЫМ МАРШРУТАМ ,ЧТО БЫ ИСПОРТИТЬ ИМ "ПИР ВО ВРЕМЯ ЧУМЫ",

      what the hell? they will get from the pier ...
  9. SAVA
    SAVA 27 August 2011 02: 54 New
    0
    WELL THAT SOMETHING IN RESPONSE, TO BATTLE THEIR DUST, ON THE SITES THIS OPINION TO FORGET LOOKING TO RETURN)))
  10. Sorry
    Sorry 27 August 2011 07: 13 New
    +1
    This action is aimed at strengthening the image of the devil on earth in the person of Russia, in the public mind and in the minds of the NATO armies. This is necessary in order to seize our territories and waters with their wealth. Further, due to the fact that we are so bad and that we have a long-standing high degree of terrorist danger, there will be demands to curtail our nuclear triad. And the last step will be the Yugoslav scenario. The army is in ruin. All hope is for China, but the Chinese will not provide services just like that. They will require territory, at least to the Urals. Moreover, they are already here. The authorities either do not see all these risks, or intentionally something or someone moves it. Only internal threats are seen, therefore anti-people’s institutions are nurtured: police, FSB, riot police, SOBR, etc.
    1. LESHA pancake
      LESHA pancake 28 August 2011 09: 56 New
      0
      where is our counter-propaganda? our Foreign Ministry and the media should, with the help of historical facts, hammer into the hot heads of Europeans that the world is better than war and in the event of a war with RUSSIA, the territory of EUROPE will become one big cemetery.
      1. SAVA
        SAVA 28 August 2011 12: 05 New
        0
        И Я О ТОМ ЖЕ!! ПАРУ ФИЛЬМОВ ПРО АМЕРИКАНЦЕВ-АГРЕССОРОВ ПРИЧЁМ ЗРЕЛИЩНЫХ СО СПЕЦЭФЕКТАМИ , ДЛЯ НАС ПРО ДМИТРИЯ ДОНСКОГО И ИЛЬЮ МУРОМЦА ВООБЩЕМ НА СОВРЕМЕННЫЙ ЛАД ПРОПАГАНДИРОВАТЬ НАШИ ЦЕННОСТИ И ИСТИННЫ "КТО К НАМ С МЕЧЁМ ПРИДЁТ ТОТ ОТ МЕЧА И ПОГИБНЕТ"
      2. kripto
        kripto 4 November 2012 09: 49 New
        0
        As where? As usual in w ... e. You will recall August 2008. As gentlemen of the moneybags owning Western media holdings, they can immediately see and give the truth to the broadcast and press. And on the other hand, the Westerner does not need this truth, they are more interested in watching the naked ass of the English prince or the scandalous divorce of another star. It is only Russians, or those who feel that way, who can perceive information with their hearts and minds, and not with a hamburger full of belly.
  11. Karish
    Karish 4 November 2012 10: 05 New
    0
    Quote: kripto
    It is only Russians, or those who feel that way, can perceive information heart and mindand not a hamburger full of belly

    Heart and mind laughing