NATO Secretary General Ian Stoltenberg gave an interview to Russian journalists

67
NATO Secretary General Ian Stoltenberg gave an interview to Russian journalists


O. Ryabtseva― Yen, hello! Alexey Vedeniktov's first question.

A. Venediktov― Mr. Secretary General, what is a greater threat for NATO countries: the policy of the Russian Federation or the "Islamic State"?

J. Stoltenberg It seems to me wrong to try to compare threats of different types. It is important that NATO faces various types of threats, coming from the south, ISIS, an organization that is responsible for acts of violence. This organization is also trying to undermine stability throughout the region. Of course, there are other problems in the East. And speaking of the East, I can say that for many years we have tried to establish cooperative, partnership relations with Russia. We are still trying to build constructive partnerships with this country. But now there is a very unfavorable situation, which has arisen due to the aggressive actions of Russia, primarily in Ukraine. Russia has forcibly changed national borders and continues to try to change borders again by force. This destroys the possibilities for creating partnerships with Russia in which we are interested.

A.Venedictov ― We’ll certainly talk about the relations between Russia, Ukraine and NATO, but still, what do you have a headache now: building a strategy to fight the “Islamic State” or building a fight against Russia?

J.Stoltenberg― These are completely different things. Islamic State terrorist organization. She commits acts of violence in Iraq, Syria. And Russia is a state, and we are interested in constructive relations and cooperation with this country. We want to develop close ties with this country. There is no reason to compare these completely different things and completely different problems. I am very sorry that Russia does not respect the principle of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine.

O. Ryabtseva― The other day you said that Russia could choose a peaceful path or isolation. Let's talk about this. It seems that NATO and Russia are confronted head-on. Is it so?

J. Stoltenberg I repeat: we don’t want any confrontation with Russia, we don’t need a cold war. We are interested in cooperation, in constructive relations with Russia. But the problem is that Russia should want this too. And the condition of constructive relations and partnership and cooperation is mutual respect. A minimal manifestation of respect is respect for borders, territorial integrity and sovereignty. If these principles are violated, then it is quite obvious that further too becomes difficult.

And I, of course, would very much like Russia to make the right choice. Because she can really choose isolation and continue to violate international law, and try to change official borders by force; or Russia can take the path of cooperation, close partnership with NATO, with the international community, respecting other countries and respecting international law. And I, of course, would like Russia to choose the second option.

A.Venediktov ― Mr. Secretary General, there is such a saying in Russia. You said that you would like for NATO and Russia to cooperate. But in Russia there is a saying: “Desire is an optional thing. Desire is a harmless thing. ” In fact, we see how mine brings the military to the border with Ukraine, but at the same time both you and NATO begin to accumulate military forces. US send 150 tanks here. You are going to deploy additional bases, additional forces, and therefore I will repeat the question of my colleague. Is it forehead to forehead?

J. Stoltenberg The steps of NATO are simply a response to Russia's actions. And our actions are, firstly, purely defensive in nature, and secondly, we strictly fulfill our international obligations and act in accordance with international law. The difference is that Russia has violated international law: used force to violate the border, territorial integrity, the principle of sovereignty of a sovereign country. And, in fact, a big difference between respect for international law, respect for national borders and, conversely, encroachment. We just respect the national borders and the sovereignty of other countries. Russia is not. Here, actually, this problem. And I sincerely regret this, because it postpones the possibility of constructive close cooperation, creates unfavorable conditions, and we are interested in cooperation with Russia, but for this to become a reality, Russia must behave somehow differently.

A.Venedictov― If a lot of free weapons, it will definitely shoot. Is NATO ready for a military confrontation with Russia?

J. Stoltenberg ― NATO absolutely does not want a cold war or a clash. We are interested in cooperation. At the same time, NATO is ready to defend all allies against any threat. We, in fact, have a defense alliance and our task is to protect all members of this alliance.

A.Venediktov органи You organize a rapid reaction force called the "Spearhead". Where is the spear directed to Mr. Putin?

J. Stoltenberg It is not that it was specifically directed at anyone. These forces allow us to respond to threats regardless of their source. And, as we see, we live in a world that is far from being so stable, far from being as safe as it was before, therefore, in fact, we decided to create these rapid reaction forces. They are not created against anyone. They can be used when necessary to protect allies, regardless of the source of the threat.

A.Venediktov― Mr. Secretary General. I am a historian by education, and I know that both a spear and tanks are an offensive weapon, not a defensive weapon. Once a spear, that is, tanks. How will you target this spear?

J. Stoltenberg ― No, we are not going to direct it to anyone. Just in case of need, we will be able to quickly deploy forces in order to protect one of the allies. We respect the principle of territorial integrity, respect the borders, the sovereignty of all our neighbors. Russia is our biggest neighbor. I believe this is a great country with a great historyand I hope that Russia will be a successful country. If Russia cooperates with us, I am convinced that both Russia and NATO will benefit from this.

A.Venediktov― The last question in this part. Do you think you will be able to convince your allies to increase funding for the creation of this rapid reaction force, to bring all countries to this, all NATO countries?

J. Stoltenberg ― I am sure that we will be able to implement the decisions that were made in September at the summit in Wales and create these “Spear Point” forces. Now we are discussing organizational issues, we have to decide on the composition, on the size of the forces, but this will be later. But I am convinced that we will be able to create these rapid reaction forces.

A. Venediktov I recall that NATO’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and Alexey Venediktov and Lesia Ryabtseva are on the air of Echo of Moscow. Lesya ...

O. Ryabtseva― Recently, the press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Peskov, said that Russia needed guarantees that Ukraine would not join NATO. Well, actually, we flew for this. Could you now give us a guarantee that Ukraine will not join NATO, or, on the contrary, will it enter?

J. Stoltenberg ― Actually, your question proves how alien you are, you don’t understand the concept of a sovereign country. The final act of Helsinki, which we signed with the Soviet Union and in many other documents signed by Russia and NATO as well as the organization, and individual members, says that any sovereign state can independently decide whether it wants to be a member of one or another an alliance or organization focused on security. And in principle, such a question itself, it seems to be an attempt on the sovereign choice of Ukraine.

Several years ago, Ukraine decided not to join any bloc or military alliance. And I respected this decision. Now there is a debate in Ukraine, there is a proposal to change this decision. If such a decision is made, if they want to join NATO, I will respect their decision, but such a decision must be made in Ukraine. And if such a decision is made, a country that meets the standards, which respects the basic principles of NATO, can in principle become a member of NATO. But this decision must be made by the country itself. More than one third non-NATO country cannot count on the right of veto or in any way influence the decision of a sovereign country such as Ukraine. This is, in fact, the principle of the sovereign right to make decisions.

O. Ryabtseva― Mr. Secretary General, forgive me for God's sake, you could not explain to me again. That is, now there is no talk about Ukraine joining NATO?

J. Stoltenberg A few years ago, Ukraine decided that it would not seek to join NATO. I respect this decision of Ukraine. Then the new government announced that it plans to hold a referendum on joining NATO. Well what can I say? At first such referendum should take place. I do not know when. If, after years, such a referendum takes place, then let the citizens of Ukraine decide. If the majority of residents decide not to change the policy and not to apply for NATO membership, then the question is removed. But if the majority of citizens in the referendum, which will be organized by the government, will vote for membership, then indeed such a question will arise. Well, then it will be necessary to look further whether Ukraine meets our standards, whether it observes all the principles of democracy, freedom, and if it can theoretically become a member of NATO. But this is a question for us of the following discussion, provided that they really want to join NATO.

A.Venedictov ― Each answer to you raises two questions. I will try to formulate and clarify. First, I correctly understand that NATO could never give and did not guarantee that a country would join NATO and that NATO would not expand further?

J. Stoltenberg Россия Russia and all allies, NATO members have signed, have repeatedly signed international agreements, which stated that free, independent countries make decisions about what security mechanisms they will, respectively, take for themselves. I respect this decision. And all the countries that have become members of NATO joined NATO of their own accord, this is their decision, a voluntary decision, that is, they wanted to join NATO and 28 independent democratic countries, through an independent democratic process they decided that they want to join the alliance. They can leave if they want. We do not force anyone to remain in the alliance. But if they do not want to leave, please, if these are democratic countries that comply with the standards and principles of the alliance, of course.

A.Venedictov второй And the second question. Our President Vladimir Putin says that he sees a threat in the expansion of NATO for Russia; that Russia is gradually surrounded by NATO bases, which are increasing their military contingents along the borders of Russia. The president says: "Look where our bases are and where their bases are." What would you say to President Putin, if you communicate through the press?

J.Stoltenberg― NATO Defense Alliance. We defend our alliance members and the expansion of NATO is the result of free, independent decisions that free, independent countries make. And, it seems to me, if someone tries to limit their right, it is an attempt to limit their freedom and independence. Secondly, I am from Norway. Our country has been a member of NATO since its inception in 45. All these years we have been neighbors - first with the Soviet Union, now with Russia - we have always had very good cooperation with Russia both on the sea and on land borders. We cooperate with Russia on a wide range of issues: energy, fisheries, the environment, at the political level, military cooperation, cooperation in the study of the North.

And this is an example of cooperation of one of the members of the alliance: Norway and Russia. Citizens of both countries benefited from this cooperation, because trade is growing, contacts between people are growing, people are moving from one country to another. NATO, in fact, is based on the principle of one hundred percent respect, mutual respect. We respected Russia, respected its interests in the North, and Russia respected the sovereignty and integrity of Norway. And as long as we respect each other, we can cooperate. We will not be a threat to each other, we are partners, we are neighbors. But if this fundamental principle of mutual respect is violated, if the boundaries change, force is used, then something completely different begins, and equally unpleasant for us and for Russia. I sincerely regret it.

A. Venediktov ― And in this regard, President Putin just says that the encirclement of Russia with bases, NATO military bases is disrespect.

J. Stoltenberg― Firstly, not all NATO countries have military bases. Secondly, indeed, the military presence is increasing, because Russia is using aggressive military force in Ukraine in the first place, changing the boundaries of an independent sovereign state. And thirdly, such a decision is always taken by free, independent countries through the democratic decision-making process, that is, if people want to join the defense alliance, I do not think that I or the Moscow political leadership can restrict this right. Such decisions of countries, residents of different countries must be respected. They join NATO voluntarily.

A. Venediktov― In this connection, you still see that escalation will continue now, because the Minsk agreements are not being implemented - both sides admit it - military escalation, military buildup in Europe on both sides of Ukraine’s border?

J. Stoltenberg ― I very much hope that the Minsk agreements will be implemented. I very much hope that we will be able to agree on peaceful solutions, find a way out of the conflict in Ukraine, because there is no and cannot be a military solution to the Ukrainian conflict, there is no alternative, that is why it is so important that the Minsk agreements are implemented, that the cease-fire principle is implemented, Russia withdrew its troops from Ukraine and respected the integrity of this country.

A.Venedictov President says: "There is no Russian wax in Ukraine." Do you have proof? Russian listeners do not know about it. It's all rumored, no?

Y.Stoltenberg― First, we were told that in the Crimea, at first there were no Russian soldiers. Then Russia recognized that there were Russian soldiers in the Crimea. Then we began to say that in the east of Ukraine there are no Russian soldiers. But according to our intelligence, they are there, Russian forces are in Ukraine. And from open sources we get the same information from journalists who work in the region, from the OSCE. Observers who are stationed both at the border and in the region, they report on the movement of troops, equipment and tanks. We have information that there are air defense systems there. Where, except from Russia, can they get such military equipment? Moreover, various non-governmental organizations report burials of Russian soldiers who died there; we receive similar information from social media. Actually, Russian journalists should probably interview the families of the victims, the families of the soldiers who died in Ukraine, so I think if we summarize the data we receive from the intelligence services, NGOs, from the media - the data on the burial of Russian soldiers who died in Ukraine - in fact, all this together allows us to form such an opinion that there are Russian troops in Ukraine, and this opinion is shared not only by me, but also by the 28 members of the alliance. They also completely assess the situation in the east of Ukraine.

A. Venediktov ― Since we started talking about weapons - is there an understanding and a consolidated position of NATO on the French setting of Mistral in Russia?

J. Stoltenberg ― The issue of the supply of military equipment is not being discussed at NATO. Such decisions are made by all allies separately. NATO does not have its own military equipment, and individual members of the alliance decide whether to sell or not to sell this or that equipment, so I will leave this question to the discretion of the French government.

A. Venediktov ― That is, NATO did not make a decision on the embargo of arms supplies to Russia?

J. Stoltenberg No, this decision was not taken by NATO. But there are economic sanctions that have been imposed by the EU, the US and other countries. And all the members of the alliance, one way or another, have joined this sanction, perhaps not through NATO - through the EU and so on. Speaking of economic sanctions, there are provisions that limit the sale of military equipment.

A. Venediktov― Mr. Secretary General, you were the Prime Minister of Norway. I have a wonderful photo, Lesya, where Mr. Prime Minister is smiling with Mr. Prime Minister Putin. They look at each other affectionately, shake hands and now ...

O. Ryabtsev: Mr Secretary General, are you ready to meet with Vladimir Putin now?

J. Stoltenberg ― First of all, I want to say that for many years in various posts in the government of Norway as a minister, as a prime minister I built good working relations with very different politicians, Russian politicians, with Mr Putin and when he was Prime Minister and when he was president. It was a good manifestation of many years of cooperation between Russia and Norway, based precisely on mutual respect. It seems to me that it is important not to close the channel for political dialogue. NATO decided to suspend tactical cooperation, but we decided to leave the channel for political dialogue. Some leaders of the alliance members have already met with President Putin at various events in Brisbane, in particular, just a few days ago. It is possible that I will meet with him, there is simply no specific agreement on a date yet. We will return somehow to this question.

A.Venediktov― And why there is no agreement on the date when the escalation increases? Already it's time to meet.

J. Stoltenberg ― I think that it will be necessary, of course, to return to the question of a meeting. I want to say that NATO has decided to leave the channels of political dialogue open, and various leaders of the countries of the alliance have already met with the political leadership of Russia on several occasions. As for the meeting between me and the members of the political leadership of Russia, including President Putin, we can return to this later.

A.Venediktov― Later - when? When will the conflict begin?

J.Stoltenberg― I can’t give a date or a time limit, I’m just saying that it’s been decided not to close the channel for political dialogue. Political dialogue is conducted at different levels between NATO, various officials, and members of the alliance meet with Russian officials, with the political leadership of Russia in various formats. And, of course, we can consider the issue of a meeting between me and the political leadership of Russia.

A.Venediktov― Last question, Mr. Secretary General. There is such a wonderful Polish satirist Jerzy Lec, he was a humorist, a satirist, and he has the phrase: “When we thought we were at the bottom, we knocked from the bottom”. Question: We are at the freezing point of the relationship between Russia and NATO, are we at the very bottom or is there something else to drown in?

J. Stoltenberg It seems to me that it would be wrong if I began to discuss this topic. I would say this: I think we can fully restore the relations of cooperation and partnership with Russia, we are striving for this. But the guarantee of this would be mutual respect, respect for the principles of international law, borders, and the integrity of independent countries. If our cooperation will be based on these fundamental principles of mutual respect, respect for the independence of all countries, I am convinced that we can build our cooperation. I have repeatedly been to Russia. It seems to me that this is a beautiful country, wonderful people live in it. A great country more than that, with a great history that has achieved a great deal. I am convinced that together we can achieve even more - if we cooperate with you. And if Russia continues to move along this path, it will be more isolated.

A. Venediktov― Pessimist.

J. Stoltenberg No, I'm just an optimist.

O. Ryabtseva― Olesya Ryabtseva and Alexey Venediktov, and we were visiting the NATO Secretary General, Jena Stoltenberg. Thank you bye!

J. Stoltenberg ― Thank you.
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    3 December 2014 14: 56
    Politicians are all two-faced, they say one thing, they think another, they do the third!
    1. +16
      3 December 2014 15: 12
      A.Venediktov Mr. General Secretary ... laughing and I see how, after this phrase, Venya licks the owner’s shoe ...
      1. -16
        3 December 2014 15: 31
        In this case, let's be objective, Venia worked professionally and with dignity.
        1. +13
          3 December 2014 15: 35
          Quote: Finches
          In this case, let's be objective, Venia worked professionally and with dignity.

          I beg you .. sorry but minus slapped you from the heart ... found the dignity of mlyn.
          1. +9
            3 December 2014 15: 40
            Yes, it's okay, but in this case, I did not mean the moral and business qualities of Venediktov, but specifically the work done - this interview!
            But as a person or his views on life, I absolutely do not like him! He would have gone to Israel better.
          2. +3
            3 December 2014 17: 20
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            You slapped from the heart ... found the dignity of Mlyn

            Similarly! Venediktov, bl ... on, right there with his very first question he compared Russia and ISIS, put it on one level am am am And what further after this it was possible to speak, when the direction was already given!
        2. Underwood
          +5
          3 December 2014 16: 05
          Quote: Finches
          Venia worked professionally and with dignity.

          do not make me laugh. Where is professionalism here? A pro, by and large, is a manipulator, virtuoso and tactician of casuistry and logical traps. And here? The husk is poster, a dumb question is a dumb answer. They would also sing "Nese Galya water ..." in three voices in the ending. Boredom.
        3. +1
          3 December 2014 18: 29
          Well, I would remember then Yugoslavia.
      2. +4
        3 December 2014 15: 37
        His hairstyle varnishes the shoes of J. Stoltenberg. good
      3. +11
        3 December 2014 15: 55
        And in what position were the questions asked ... winked
        In general, the questions are Kholui. He did not even try to question the West's claim that "Russia is a threat."
        1. +5
          3 December 2014 17: 07
          Yeah, and having received an answer about the presence of Russian troops in Ukraine, I moved on to the next question, although the answer of the secretary (in the text) allowed me to ask many questions: - graves, obses, networks, and more.
    2. +4
      3 December 2014 15: 13
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      Politicians are all two-faced, they say one thing, they think another, they do the third!

      Our journalists ... are from the same test (I mean those who interviewed) .. they could not ask a question about Crimea and ask to substantiate international "law" with regard to Yugoslavia and Kosovo.
      And our actions are, firstly, of a purely defensive nature, and secondly, we strictly comply with our international obligations, We act in accordance with international law.

      In general, if NATO did not impose sanctions, then their governments directly bypassing the UN and WTO violated international law and somehow modestly keeps silent about it .. I am very, very glad that the South Stream was "closed" .. nerds tried to blackmail and now they are going to guess for a week what to do next after they have shot their own purses.
    3. +6
      3 December 2014 15: 14
      Dialogue of two Russophobes.
      1. Underwood
        -6
        3 December 2014 16: 20
        Quote: Thought Giant
        Dialogue of two Russophobes

        Well, with norg it is more or less clear, but at Venediktov, where did you hear Russophobic rhetoric?
      2. +1
        3 December 2014 16: 40
        "customer representative" and traitor-performer.
      3. +2
        3 December 2014 20: 10
        Quote: Thought Giant
        Dialogue of two Russophobes.


        That's for sure, and both are proud of it, and letting in verbal fog. stop
        1. 0
          4 December 2014 08: 13
          She is not, this conscience. This is temporarily unavailable when there are technical problems, in our case, these individuals have a structure without it.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +6
      3 December 2014 17: 07
      This is not an interview with Russian journalists, this is an interview with Western journalists pretending to be Russian ...
      1. 0
        4 December 2014 09: 03
        but working at the "Russian" radio station (EchoMoscow)
    6. +3
      3 December 2014 19: 05
      From this interview, only one conclusion can be drawn, no matter what Russia does, it is always to blame. And you cannot agree with NATO, the more you talk with them, the more tanks are on the Russian borders. We must respond to force with even greater force, otherwise NATO will not understand.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. Denis fj
      0
      3 December 2014 19: 55
      It was possible not to take an interview, it is clear in advance what this "politician" will say. Another thing is that Venediktov needs to promote himself in front of his fans ...
  2. +12
    3 December 2014 14: 57
    J. Stoltenberg ― No, we are not going to direct him to anyone. Simply, if necessary, we can deploy forces faster in order to protect one of the allies.
    lying, p.a.d.la.a. and doesn’t blush! The country is almost completely surrounded by NATO bases! Does this mean everything for defense ?!
  3. +7
    3 December 2014 14: 59
    Interviewers are traitors and provocateurs. Slime dishes. Stoltenberg - Jesuit of pure water. It puts the facts upside down. I hope they are under the hood of the competent authorities.
    1. +1
      3 December 2014 15: 42
      And the article is called incorrectly !!! It is necessary so:

      NATO Secretary General Ian Stoltenberg gives an interview "Russian journalists"
  4. SamSeBse
    +12
    3 December 2014 15: 01
    O. Ryabtseva― Yen, hello! Alexey Vedeniktov's first question.

    A. Venediktov ...

    On this reading was stopped ... angry
    1. +3
      3 December 2014 15: 17
      Quote: SamSebe
      O. Ryabtseva― Yen, hello! Alexey Vedeniktov's first question.

      A. Venediktov ...

      On this reading was stopped ... angry

      there are further Benedict with the words of the lord! began to squish deliciously. So what you did right
      I read diagonally anyway ... ugh damn (((

      PS
      I'm starting to get disappointed in the Yandex search engine, they are increasingly hanging on the headlines every nonsense like
      Mcdonald's will raise prices in Russia by 1,3%

      Here I am now, with a cry of alarm, the alarm will run ... I don’t know where))
      1. SamSeBse
        +3
        3 December 2014 15: 18
        What can I say ... I'm sorry. wink
        I watched the water laughing
        Quote: Scoun
        cry alarm alarm run away ... I do not know where))
        laughing
        1. +1
          3 December 2014 20: 20
          Quote: SamSebe
          I watched the water


          "... How did you look at the water" - is it like "... where did the dog dig"?
      2. Underwood
        0
        3 December 2014 16: 23
        Quote: Scoun
        Mcdonald's will raise prices in Russia by 1,3%
        Here I am now, with a cry of alarm, the alarm will run ... I don’t know where))

        Yes, run to the supermarket, look at the price tags. From there run away (silently) utilities payment. After NG places where to run
        Quote: Scoun
        shouting alarm alarm
        will be added. Be patient.
        1. 0
          3 December 2014 18: 38
          Quote: Underwood
          Yes, run to the supermarket, look at the price tags.

          In our family ... it so happened that 95% of the products I buy and I bring and it so happens that I just now know which store and what products I should go to, and if I take famous networkers, I can say that for example a package of greens is allsorts in five 35.95 and in the attack of 18.90 I also get cheese and fruit ... and how grapes, apples, citrus fruits were at home ... damn what to say a bucket of sauerkraut in a magnet under 75 rubles and in a tent 36 rubles kg ...
      3. +2
        3 December 2014 20: 18
        Quote: Scoun
        Mcdonald's will raise prices in Russia by 1,3%
        Here I am now, with a cry of alarm, the alarm will run ... I don’t know where))


        And why shouldn't Russia liquidate these eateries, and at the same time the poison of Pepsi and Coca? I think the Americans would have signed up for joy. bully
  5. Bombardier
    +4
    3 December 2014 15: 03
    We have already learned these songs by heart that we should talk to the "disc", especially since the interview is being conducted by "Echo of Moscow". Wasted time ...
  6. +7
    3 December 2014 15: 04
    laugh at this interview ... NOT ONE DIRECT RESPONSE .... NATO Secretary of State in his style ...

    we want to be friends with RUSSIA on our terms .... and that means NATO troops must be on the borders of RUSSIA, and that means RUSSIA must comply with NATO requirements, in general it is our quirky, cunning and treacherous enemy who put on the guise of an allegedly good neighbor in the garden.

    Such enemies are very dangerous because they often beat him in the back from the underbody just for a second to relax.
    1. +4
      3 December 2014 15: 18
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      laugh at this interview ...
      The original sounds cool (I'm translating):
      1. +1
        3 December 2014 17: 35
        So mysteriously translates. wink
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +6
      3 December 2014 15: 28
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      NOT ONE DIRECT RESPONSE ....

      And not a single normal question!
      1. +4
        3 December 2014 16: 02
        All participants in this interview are facing each other.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  7. calocha
    +3
    3 December 2014 15: 04
    NATO is a military bloc, a military bloc is the sword of Capitalism! As the bankers say, so Mr. Stolinberg will dance! After the Ukrainian events, only a Fool can take a word!
  8. +4
    3 December 2014 15: 05
    A true western military diplomat. I got the impression that they went to the same school with Klitschko.
    1. +14
      3 December 2014 15: 14
      Klitschko do not touch, he is having dinner ...
      1. +1
        3 December 2014 16: 42
        Giant connoisseur of the theory of relativity - even time forced to go in the opposite direction
      2. +2
        3 December 2014 17: 32
        So from one o'clock in the afternoon, until twelve tomorrow. wassat
        1. 0
          4 December 2014 09: 01
          Then we remember cartoons about Cheburashka and Crocodile Gena - "I have two breaks for two lunches" fellow
  9. +4
    3 December 2014 15: 06
    A. Venediktov - Let me remind you that NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg is on the air of "Echo of Moscow" with Alexey Venediktov and Lesya Ryabtseva. "Mister" visited his slaves ...
    A brief note: In 2001, Putin invited Alexei Venediktov to a meeting in the Kremlin library. Trying to build bridges at the same time and warn against his understanding of relations with Venediktov, the Russian president extensively talked about the difference between enemies and traitors.

    “For Putin, this is a key difference,” Venediktov said. “He said:“ The enemies are right in front of you, you are at war with them, then you make a truce, and everything is clear. The traitor must be destroyed, crushed. "This is his worldview. And then he said:" You know, Alexey, you are not a traitor. You are the enemy "...
  10. +2
    3 December 2014 15: 10
    In short, he wagged, wagged his tail, like a mongrel, but really didn’t honestly answer a single question. Two-faced (A) nous.
  11. Grenz
    +2
    3 December 2014 15: 13
    It seems that all the least or less significant Western politicians are stupidly zombified according to the same scenario: "Russia is an enemy and an aggressor, we are peaceful and fluffy. We are only defending ourselves from the brutal Russians ..."
    And after all, it is not possible to prove and finish rolling.
    Yes, send everyone to x ... and live your life.
    True, the entire "liberal wagon train" was to be unhooked and, as it was, in due time to be sent outside Russia.
    And even the collage before the article - NATO hung over Russia.
    Fuck them!
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +2
    3 December 2014 15: 16
    The interview is about nothing .... Venediktov just wanted to get in the way ....
  14. P-38
    +4
    3 December 2014 15: 16
    The impression that either on "Echo of Moscow" there is not a single normal journalist for a really interesting interview, or the interview is a pure substitution for the Western layman: "you see, Russian journalists cannot oppose Stoltenberg's position."
    1. 0
      3 December 2014 17: 31
      Much like this! Or why would this general, and obviously with his retinue, go to such distances, if they "suspended" cooperation and do not really want to hear anything from us!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  15. +2
    3 December 2014 15: 20
    I think that even NATO Secretary General is a smaller enemy of Russia than this liberalist.
  16. +5
    3 December 2014 15: 22
    NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg! You gave me a brain, bastard! One and the same taldychit. Who did you do these?
  17. ZAM
    +5
    3 December 2014 15: 23
    Not the echo of Moscow, but the echo of Washington - it's time to rename and judge how agents of the CIA
  18. +3
    3 December 2014 15: 26
    This is not an interview with Russian journalists, it is a dialogue between the NATO Secretary General and the paid pro-American scribbler. The conversation is about nothing, and with a disgusting translation, apparently electronic. Reprint from Western media?
  19. +5
    3 December 2014 15: 26
    ... indeed, the military presence is increasing because Russia uses aggressive military force, in Ukraine, first of all, changing the borders of an independent sovereign state.

    As the ram went wrong, it repeats like a mantra, and this mongrel sale still works on an echo.
  20. +1
    3 December 2014 15: 28
    not the secretary general, but the homosexual, this term is more suitable, etozh Europe))))))
    1. +2
      3 December 2014 22: 56
      Quote: kostyan77708
      not a general secretary, but a homosexual, this term is more suitable, etozh Europe)))))

      -----------------------
      On the forums are the wording "NATO geisex Stolbtenberg" and "UN geisex Panda Moon" ...
  21. +4
    3 December 2014 15: 31
    I read it diagonally ... A. Venediktov is the same "journalist" as Joseph Goebbels ... The whole point of the conversation boiled down to different interpretations of the same question "Mr. Secretary General, and when will the attack on Russia be so that on Kutuzovsky and Arbat to have time to hang white flags, and on Red Square to put girls with loaves to meet the "democratic" army? "
  22. +3
    3 December 2014 15: 33
    In the answers bullshit! No one will chew on this hypocrisy! True in other answers!
  23. +3
    3 December 2014 15: 37
    Mr. Venediktov-BES !!! with all coming out ....
  24. +2
    3 December 2014 15: 39
    False answers like J. Stoltenberg himself. And questions licking the ass. crying
  25. +3
    3 December 2014 15: 40
    "NATO Secretary General Ian Stoltenberg gave an interview to Russian journalists"

    Where are the "Russian journalists" here? Venediktov or what?
  26. +2
    3 December 2014 15: 41
    By the way, why not meet this Norwegian with journalists, for example, the Zvezda TV channel? I think there would be more interesting, really acute and interesting questions. And even better - with the correspondents of the Republic of Tatarstan, so that the whole world is on air. No? It's a pity...
    1. 0
      4 December 2014 09: 09
      Only direct GDP is capable of direct answers on the air, no matter how personally one relates to it.
  27. +1
    3 December 2014 15: 45
    Doesn't the name "NATO Secretary General Gave Interviews to Russian Journalists" sound vulgar? I didn't notice the Russian journalists. Well ... lisa, not a single normal question. It is true, as the owner asks uncomfortable questions, suddenly sweating, but blurt out something. And even worse, it will move away from the trough. And that peddler himself ... rilo NATO, how wasted. And then they are white, and fluffy, and for world peace. And who, with ... and, drove Yugoslavia into the Stone Age without trial and investigation, and who drove Iraq, Libya and further down the list to crap. T.v.a.r. and not people, they only need to wet everyone in the toilet. Yes, more. He didn’t read history, but he’s just lying about modern times. Normal people know exactly how "voluntarily and democratically" all countries came running to NATO. K. a.z.y.l.
  28. bagRich
    +2
    3 December 2014 15: 52
    One thing I don’t understand, why interview him? With him, and so everything is clear .. Another PR here is his
  29. +1
    3 December 2014 15: 53
    I could just say - "We are for cooperation with Russia, if it will obey us in everything." It is also not surprising that such would-be journalists as Venediktov and Ryabtsev were admitted to Stoltenberg - not a single noteworthy issue, which is only the form of address - almost "oh, sovereign!"
  30. 0
    3 December 2014 15: 58
    this geyseko nato needs to be asked as a man — you will answer for the bazaar that in Novorossia there are our linear units with their own standard equipment, but it won’t work out, he’s not a man like a campaign, but an unprincipled entity.
    1. 0
      4 December 2014 09: 12
      The same bullshit as the previous one "geisek" (smiled, however!) and the same FUCK as Jose [Em] Manuel Barroso ("Putin told me that he could take Kiev in a week")
  31. kirqiz ssr
    +1
    3 December 2014 16: 01
    honestly say these zhurnalyugi such stupid questions were asked by the attendants even didn’t read the dock; the zhurnalyugi didn’t sell from the echo of Moscow I would ask such a question on what equipment do you bomb countries who gave you such a right to get into your garden
  32. Rubmolot
    +2
    3 December 2014 16: 04
    10 false pearls of J. Stoltenberg, NATO Secretary General:

    1. Our actions are, firstly, purely defensive in nature

    2. act in accordance with international law

    3. we just respect the national borders and sovereignty of other countries. Russia - no

    4. we respect the principle of territorial integrity, respect the borders, sovereignty of all our neighbors

    5. you do not understand the concept of a sovereign country

    6. Let the citizens of Ukraine decide

    7. 28 independent democracies, through an independent democratic process, have decided that they want to join the alliance. They can leave if they want. We are not forcing anyone to stay in the alliance.

    8. NATO defense alliance

    9. Such decisions of countries, residents of different countries must be respected. They join NATO voluntarily

    (Czech Republic, April 1, 1997 - The referendum on Czech Republic joining NATO, according to President Havel, is mostly nonsense.

    "No country in the process of joining NATO organized a referendum, with the exclusion of Spain, which then regretted it. The alliance is actually a treaty between the state and therefore does not need to decide to enter NATO through a referendum," Havel says.)

    http://www.natoaktual.cz/na_cr.aspx?y=na_cr/cravztahysnatoiii.htm

    10. It is important that the Minsk accords be implemented, that the principle of ceasefire be implemented
  33. +1
    3 December 2014 16: 07
    And where is your respect, Mr. NATO? Have you taken into account at least one Russian interest? There is nothing to talk with the gundos.
  34. 0
    3 December 2014 16: 17
    Is this a transcript? A bunch of spelling mistakes. And to be honest, the NATO-Russia dialogue, the dialogue between the blind and the deaf. NATO - such rosy cherubim who gathered together and defend themselves, the question is from whom ?! If there is no enemy, then you need to make him and the more the enemy the more necessary they become! Everything, damn it, is just to disgrace. And one more thing, the entire interview, the secretary, as a regular, insists on respect and territorial integrity. And respect for the history of Russia, its vital interests, the protection of ethnic Russians, and Kosovo, after all! I have a lot of words, but all of them, unfortunately, are obscene.
  35. 0
    3 December 2014 16: 26
    I didn’t even finish it, I threw it in the middle, two talkers, they pushed water in a mortar, the same thing.
  36. Bator79
    +4
    3 December 2014 16: 33
    Benedict scum and enemy
  37. 0
    3 December 2014 16: 50
    And why then print a dialogue 2x gift of ases and one parstitutke?
    1. 0
      3 December 2014 17: 16
      Quote: alien50
      And why then print a dialogue 2x gift of ases and one parstitutke?
      well, such as democracy and freedom of speech feel
  38. +2
    3 December 2014 16: 57
    Conclusion: attempts to bring us to our knees will continue and grow, well, we are already preparing to receive "dear" guests, and there is a shield and a sword on the spear
  39. 0
    3 December 2014 17: 03
    Who about what, and lousy about the bath. True, there are several of them.
  40. +1
    3 December 2014 17: 11
    J. Stoltenberg― NATO’s steps are simply a response to Russia's actions. And our actions are, firstly, of a purely defensive nature, and secondly, we strictly comply with our international obligations, act in accordance with international law. The difference is that Russia violated international law: it used force to violate the border, territorial integrity, the principle of sovereignty of a sovereign country.
    Yeah, but you can’t stroke the ass with a kuros.
  41. 0
    3 December 2014 17: 13
    I am very sorry that Russia does not respect the principle of sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. And what trunk did you overthrow the president and organize chaos and aggression? It’s like an uncle is an adult, and even obvious things are babbling to children ....... the impression is that he will start talking a little more about democracy, then he will have to take the listeners straight from maternity hospitals so that they immediately plop out into the fluffy fairy tale. .....
  42. 0
    3 December 2014 17: 13
    Echo is still not our echo.
  43. 0
    3 December 2014 17: 26
    Yes, let him go FOREST!
  44. 0
    3 December 2014 17: 32
    A. Venediktov― Pessimist.

    J. Stoltenberg No, I'm just an optimist.
    all two-faced and tame knots, from whose hands they feed there and crap and look to the side to be praised
  45. wanderer_032
    +1
    3 December 2014 17: 35
    If Russia finds itself in the so-called isolation, the EU will be without inexpensive raw materials, which will be very painful for the EU economy.

    Apparently examples with agricultural products from the EU this year have badly cleared the brains of the "assessors" from NATO.
    The fact that the EU is trying to up its currency against the ruble only harms the EU. Their goods will soon become too expensive in Russia and will cease to be bought at all.

    EU countries will simply lose the remnants of their market and will be forced to reduce their production or sharply lower prices to just sell everything. So that there is no oversaturation of its own market and the goods are not stocked up in warehouses.
    In about a year, large industrial enterprises in the EU will begin to lay off staff at their factories and phase out some of their production just to stay "afloat."

    This will cause a lot of discontent among the common population and lead to riots in the streets. After all, ordinary workers will be fired as always, and this will create a lot of problems in the economy.
    People will have nothing to pay on loans, pay bills for electricity, water and other utilities.

    This guy said something about mutual respect, etc. So, we don't need such "respect" (read humiliation) from the EU for nothing. You see, they are ready to cooperate with Russia if it bends under them. And "hu-hu not ho-ho" ??!
    Soon you will crawl yourself, but it will be too late. The end of your well-fed "burgher" life is coming, so you started running.
  46. 0
    3 December 2014 17: 39
    3.14 is from start to finish. am We will not agree on anything with them. Yes and whether it is necessary?
  47. +1
    3 December 2014 17: 41
    Roosters they are all ...
  48. +3
    3 December 2014 18: 16
    The interview is very weak, sharp edges are circumvented, comrade Secretary General allowed to remain silent on all questions. He didn’t answer ONE. I would be ashamed to show off such an interview.
    The guys journalists need to prepare for the interview, they decided to take it in a snap, ashamed. But such an enemy must be driven into the corner by tough questions.
    1 Foreign policy
    2 Report on the objective control of NATO airspace of Ukraine at the time of the Boeing disaster.
    3 Why do they need Ukraine?
    4 What is Ukraine planning to deploy NATO, what types of weapons?
    5 And what was planned to be installed in the Crimea, here is the data ... etc.
    6 And if tomorrow on social media sites a photograph of the secretary general with a weapon appears somewhere near Donetsk, does this mean that he took part in the ATO?
    Well, I do not teach you !!!
    Return the money for a business trip to accounting, you did not cope with the editorial assignment, disgraced yourself in front of the country.
    1. 0
      4 December 2014 09: 17
      These "[anti]Russian journalists"the editorial assignment was completely different - not to" gut Stolbtenberg", but on the contrary - once again pro-publicize" NATO's peace-loving policy "and its geyseka.
  49. 0
    3 December 2014 18: 53
    Quote: African
    Yeah, and having received an answer about the presence of Russian troops in Ukraine, I moved on to the next question, although the answer of the secretary (in the text) allowed me to ask many questions: - graves, obses, networks, and more.

    And again, no evidence. "If there are weapons and tanks there, then they are definitely from Russia" - this is the main proof.
  50. vzunnu
    -4
    3 December 2014 19: 31
    Attention! A product came out that you could only dream of. Exciting chewing gum - which will take any girl to bed in 5 minutes. Customer Reviews Here --- linkdom.ru/co/Cr3aaV
    1. 0
      3 December 2014 19: 39
      Dear site, you are not accidentally mistaken !!!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  51. 0
    3 December 2014 19: 53
    1. Why does the NATO Secretary General talk about international law, which NATO violates with enviable regularity? Why doesn’t Venediktov ask questions about this?
    2. The OSCE refers to NATO on the issue of the presence of Russian troops in Ukraine, and NATO refers to the OSCE. Neither one nor the other provides ANY evidence, sending evidence to dubious resources such as social media. networks. The “100500” dead Russian soldiers in Ukraine currently exist only in the imagination of Elena Vasilyeva. No other information about them is found anywhere. According to Vasilyeva, about 5000 people have already died. Such losses cannot be hidden by any prohibitions. You can hide the number of losses, but not the fact of the death of military personnel on such a scale. It would have come to light a long time ago.
    3. Where is the question of concealing information on the Boeing crash? Why is part of the recording classified? Where is the data from Avax at the time of the plane attack?
    4. Where is the question about the participation of American (and not only) mercenaries in the so-called. ATO? Where is the question of using heavy weapons against civilians?
    5. Where is the question about the illegal actions of the “Maidan” and the criminal prosecution of murderers in Odessa? How does this relate to “respect” for international law and human rights?
    6. How to understand the actions of the United States and NATO in Syria in light of the Ukrainian conflict? Weapons are being supplied to Syria completely openly, rebels are being trained, and the US military is working. Where is the respect for international law and the borders of the independent state of Syria?

    This, journalist Venediktov, is not an interview, but sycophancy.
  52. 0
    3 December 2014 20: 44
    At every meeting and meeting with the aggressor, we must demand that Nazism be destroyed. Let the support of NATO remove the Nazis from Kuev and it will become Kiev, and the conflict will be settled. We cannot stop the fight against Nazism and Bandera’s followers for a moment and continue the fight by any means, including gas.
  53. 0
    3 December 2014 21: 55
    How white and fluffy NATO is.
  54. 0
    3 December 2014 22: 30
    The title of the article is not entirely correct. Not “Russian journalists”, but “Russian-speaking journalists”.
  55. 0
    3 December 2014 23: 12
    strange title of the article, don’t you think? Where are the Russian journalists?
  56. +1
    4 December 2014 00: 26
    Russian corrupt creatures ask questions, their favorite answers. Holy shit!!!
  57. DPN
    0
    4 December 2014 10: 54
    The guys tested NATO’s behavior and received an answer: until RUSSIA raises its hands, nothing good will come from NATO.
    On the other hand, what is the WEST, approximately 1/2 part of RUSSIA, so is it worth raising your hands in front of this MURCH. When a civilization turns its nose to the top, it is destroyed by BARBARIANS, the West sucks at knowing HISTORY.
    It remains to be regretted that in 1945 all this evil spirits were not dumped into the Atlantic Ocean.