South Korean Navy received a new landing ship

At the end of November, the lead large landing ship of the LST-II project was transferred to the Korean Navy. The BDK was built by Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction Co and named after the second highest mountain located in South Korea - Cheonwangbong (Chonwangbong). This is reported by the blog bmpd. The ship will go into combat fleet by the middle of next year.

Large landing ship LST 686 "Cheonwangbong" project LST-II

“The large landing ship of the LST-II project has a standard displacement of 4950 t, full - 7140 t. Its greatest length is 126,9 m, width - 19,4 m, draft - 5,4 m. The two-shaft main power plant includes four diesel engines MAN 12V28 / 33D with total power 16286 l. with. and provides full speed up to 23 knots. Navigation range economical move 12 bonds. - up to 8000 miles The armament includes artillery mounts: one 40-mm coaxial and two 20-mm, ”leads the blog specifications. In addition, a space is reserved on the ship for installations of vertical launch of short-range SAM systems.

The ship does not have a bow ramp and a full dock camera. According to the authors of the publication, "the landing should be carried out with the help of three landing boats of the LCM type, two of which are carried on the deck of the ship and must be launched by cranes, and the third is on the stern slip." On the ship it is possible to base one or two UH-60 helicopters or “Surion”. According to media reports, the LST-II assault booster is 300 people. The number of possible placement on board military equipment is not reported.

Comments

[RESEARCHER]

"The ship does not have a bow ramp and a full-fledged dock chamber"
Let then our Mistals redeem. France has a tarnished reputation, and we are forfeited.
I am not going to discuss here the backwardness of Korean technical thought.

[enot73]

Quote: RESEARCHER

"The ship does not have a bow ramp and a full-fledged dock chamber"

IMHO, Koreans are simply never going to land an landing somewhere, and the ship is just transport.

[svp67]

Quote: enot73

IMHO, Koreans are simply never going to land an landing somewhere, and the ship is just transport.

The first statement is VERY controversial, and the second is POSSIBLE. They have a difficult coast there and it is easier to land troops from landing boats than through the front ramp ...

[donavi49]

They have Dokdo. And the most powerful destroyers in the world such as Sejong the Great. And if they want more, they will go along the knurled - Burke -> Sejong, for example LHA-8 (America's version with a dock) - their UDC for 50 tons.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: RESEARCHER

"The ship does not have a bow ramp and a full-fledged dock chamber"
Let then our Mistals redeem. And we are forfeited.

Hmm ... it's like asking us to buy Chinese Kalash.

Koreans already have Dokdo.

[Ezhaak]

Quote: RESEARCHER

Let then our Mistals redeem.

Well, let's say they bought it. And what can they do with them, the Mistrals? All electrics according to Russian standards! All connectors for connecting equipment and equipment according to Russian standards! Well this is to cut off all cable channels and install new ones !!! And that's not all!
Do you personally agree to buy an exorbitant computer that is unable to work with Windows and change nodes at your own expense to make it work on your terms?

[TECHNOLOGY]

Let then our Mistals redeem.Korea has the most powerful system for the production of ANY ship. Its helicopter carriers. They are leaders in the construction of not only civilian vessels (such as tankers for 450000 tons, but also in frigates and destroyers. And, by the way, they suggested we build helicopter carriers. Do not laugh at the South Caucasus. There, we still have to catch up.

[RESEARCHER]

They may have excellent troughs, but I don’t argue. But they obviously lack their own weapons.

[chunga-changa]

Quote: RESEARCHER

Let then our Mistals redeem.

Koreans have their Mistrals, better than French.

[Giant thought]

Our old BDKs will functionally look better.

[donavi49]

No, that's just the point for Koreans, the BDK scheme fell away immediately for 2 reasons:
- very poor coastline of the main place of application.
- supersaturation by means of artillery destruction of the near contour, which cannot be suppressed.

Roughly speaking, the BDK will shoot the North from direct-fire guns. But if you move away from the coast, you can safely load - for only solitary artillery shells (whose batteries will press as far as possible) and R-type P-15 - which will be pierced by King Sejon and Co. will fly in.

The purpose of building the ship is extremely simple:
strengthen the first wave.

It carries landing craft as Dodko + throws amphibious forces right into the water.

The result is an extremely cheap, seaworthy version of the landing ship.

[avt]

Quote: donavi49

The purpose of building the ship is extremely simple:
strengthen the first wave.

Just as I have been talking for a long time in disputes with the "tank marines" - not through the heroism of the bow ramp, but by means of a lighter carrier. We have mastered this topic quite well and brought it to the nuclear "Northern Sea Route". And now he is in splendid isolation -, Kosygins "Have gone, like their smaller brothers, there is one of the Chinese icebreaker goes. Here on the BDK, we open the Arctic again. Well at least the Sevmorput was preserved and repaired.

[17085]

This steamer is closer to the mistral, an over-horizon landing. Depending on which crane, there may be a weather restriction. With a slip, this is the same garbage ... The docking chamber is cool, can our BDK really take anything afloat through a ramp? Besides water ...

[donavi49]

Where did they see Mistral ??? Normal semi-transport with the ability to amplify the first wave with heavy equipment at the level of UDC Dokdo.

[17085]

What is "semi-transport"? Sorry for my ignorance. And which country has such a class of ships? In Russia and South Korea, definitely not.

[Ezhaak]

Quote: 17085

take anything afloat through a ramp?

Everything that descended from a ship under its own power can likewise board a ship. The question begs itself. For this, the landing party in order to return on occasion? Or to perform a combat mission?

[17085]

Cases are different and the tasks are different, I don’t think the fact that you have a one-way ticket in any case will help the task very much ...

Everything that descended from a ship under its own power can likewise board a ship.

I didn’t go to the BDK, but common sense tells me that an armored troop-carrier on the ramp, when the BDK is empty, it just doesn’t stupidly climb, and if the BDK is lying on the beach, it won’t get down from the beach with an armored troop-carrier ...

[Penelope]

Somehow, everything is uncomfortable when landing, on a roskaryak.

[Sharky]

Armament is also not a lot. And the speed is not so hot for a landing ship ... Maybe our "Zubr" (speed - 60 knots (111,12 km / h)). It will fly from Baltiysk to Poland in a few minutes, if necessary.
For the landing there are 4 rooms with 140 seats. Instead of military equipment, the room can be equipped to accommodate an additional 366 people (about 500 people in total).
two launchers of the A-22 Fire system for 140,3 mm unguided missile shells (ammunition - 66 rounds for each launcher) and a fire control system
Anti-aircraft artillery two 30 mm automatic installations of the AK-630 type (ammunition load - 3000 rounds) and an MP-123-02 fire control system
Missile armament 8 sets of portable air defense systems of the "Igla" type

[donavi49]

And what about the Bison? The bison is a concept of modern MDK / LCAC - ran into tight fire - unloaded - fled. Only now we have come to the conclusion that to overcome the last circuit on something more is suicide. Therefore, TDK and LCAC are built on 40-60 nodes that are transported to the DKVD / UDC to the site and discarded in the landing zone.

BISON can only work on the seas, because autonomy and seaworthiness is not enough.

[Sharky]

And who is South Korea's most likely opponent? Isn't North Korea your way? Are there millions of kilometers between countries or is it necessary to cross the ocean?

[avt]

Quote: Sharky

The armament is also not a lot

The seas are going to fight on the landing! ??

Quote: Sharky

... And the speed is not so hot for a landing ship ... Either our "Bison

Yeah - quickly get to the shore and die ??

[Sharky]

What, in your opinion, does not matter the speed for the landing ship? What is important is surprise and a quick landing. If the coast is shallow, then the Bison will crawl right onto the beach. The landing speed increases dramatically! Yes, and to support the landing from the side with fire is also not bad if that ... I think that for the Baltic, this is the optimal landing ship.

[avt]

Quote: Sharky

And what do you think the speed does not matter for the landing ship?

For the ship it doesn’t, and don’t accelerate to the second spacecraft, but for the means of landing it has it.

Quote: Sharky

! Yes, and keeping fire on board the landing is also not bad if that ...

If it comes, that "- write a funeral for the entire landing with the" Bison ", and practically the battalion will have to write, and at the same time curse the designers that they did not book it like a dreadnought and put so few weapons on it." Bison " , for all its outstanding characteristics, a giant dinosaur is on the verge of extinction, wherever it went - "Murena" but as a delivery vehicle from the UDC. The Greeks scurry between the islands with the option of shelter and refuel - wherever it went, maybe for the Baltic - it will not disappear good.

[Serg65]

Quote: Sharky

What, in your opinion, does not matter the speed for the landing ship? What is important is surprise and a quick landing. If the coast is shallow, then the Bison will crawl right onto the beach. The landing speed increases dramatically! Yes, and to support the landing from the side with fire is also not bad if that ... I think that for the Baltic, this is the optimal landing ship.

Aleksey, have you ever heard how the Zubr approaches the shore? You can hear it from a dozen kilometers away, and the water-dust halo above it is already very noticeable, this is due to the suddenness, and no one has canceled the radiolactivation.

[hz123]

I wonder, why is he at all? do they have islands there disputed with the north or samurai is not the case?

[donavi49]

They have one sworn there northern a friend with a very complex coastline, continuous mining and simply unbelievable by modern standards near defense of the coast, especially if the army is brought into battle - there TDKs have little chance of survival, it is commonplace because even for TDKs there are very few landing zones.

[hz123]

carrier freight 200?

[Vasily Ivashov]

Koreans are building good ships, but here is a complete misunderstanding with the landing method.

[avt]

Quote: Vasily Ivashov

Koreans are building good ships, but here is a complete misunderstanding with the landing method.

Because we chased a seat for a turntable, instead of making a normal crane at the stern, where it would be convenient to place for transportation and maintenance of lighters, boats. Our approach, both for lighters and Arctic suppliers, is more intelligent. Chamois ",,, Dugongi" and it is necessary to make lighters with the appropriate measurements and crane facilities, and not engage in sadomasochism with project 11711.

[lazy]

something, well, nothing at all, and where are the 2 front cranes that will be launched into the water?

[Eggor]

A few photos of the Korean ship:

[TECHNOLOGY]

Koreans are for us. I repeat, they have fucking shipyards. Caps throw neighbors on the porch.

[Gans1234]

Che say - well done Koreans.
I’m a mother of Japan, they survived - Korean shipyards are cooler than ours

[Prager]

I fully support you to the last word. The Koreans will not surprise you yet.

[surovts.valery]

Quote: 17085

This steamer is closer to the mistral, an over-horizon landing. Depending on which crane, there may be a weather restriction. With a slip, this is the same garbage ... The docking chamber is cool, can our BDK really take anything afloat through a ramp? Besides water ...

Something I do not see in this wonderful ship of the LST concept. Our "Poles" 775 and 1171 are much more functional. They can load equipment from the unequipped coast and afloat, from the water floating. Further, they can receive equipment from transports at sea and deliver it, again, to an unequipped coast. And then it turns out that he takes the equipment only in the port, goes to the place of disembarkation, unloads the boats with a crane, then on them again with a crane the equipment. A very dreary process. The Koreans were greedy, and all that was business: cut off the nose, stick in the flaps and ramp.

[TECHNOLOGY]

DON'T AGAINST LEARNING FROM KOREA? If not, then it’s worth it. Just lose time with a potential partner.One and half year!

[g1v2]

ATP, a very informative video.

[Aasdem]

Korea is not building paratroopers against the northerners, but against the Japanese - there are so many problems with them!
and about the fact that 775 is better, 775 turntables do not carry as much as this "Korean". typical ship from the series "who will be the first to occupy this rock".