Caesar, the hero of "Little Land"

32
The memory of the heroes of the Great Patriotic War — the people to whom subsequent generations of citizens of the Soviet Union, Russia and many other countries owe their lives and peaceful skies — is never superfluous. In this article we will discuss one of these heroes - the legendary Caesar Kunikova. Compared with many other participants in the war, the feat of Caesar Lvovich Kunikov received sufficient fame. The heroic officer, a marine, distinguished himself in many front-line operations and died during the liberation of the Novorossiysk coast of February 14 of 1943. On the very “Little Land” about which Secretary General Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev, among others, left his memories.

As is known, in winter 1943 of the year, and to be precise, in February, a military operation was planned to liberate Novorossiysk. It was to be carried out by the forces of the navy, which was supposed to be landed in the area of ​​South Ozereyka. At the same time, in order to cover up the actions of a large landing force, one more amphibious landing force was to be landed near the village of Stanichka on the bank of the Tsemesskaya Bay, whose task was to divert the enemy’s forces from the landing of the main units of the Soviet troops. On the night of February 3, the 1943 of the year, a naval landing force landed on the bank of the Tsemesskaya bay. I must say that this place was defended by significant forces of Hitler's troops. The Germans tried to strengthen the area, rightly expecting that it could attract the attention of Soviet troops.

However, the Soviet marines managed to lightly knock the Germans off the coast and go on the offensive. On the morning of February 4, the Soviet marines were able to beat off three kilometers of the railway and part of the village of Stanichka, entrenched on the coast. In the midst of fierce battles, the avant-garde detachment under the command of Caesar Kunikov managed to suppress the resistance of one of the German artillery batteries, after which the German artillery guns were turned against the Nazis, which largely contributed to the success of the operation.

Caesar, the hero of "Little Land"


During the week, until February 10, Kunikov’s division maintained positions on the coast. By that time, it became known that the naval landing in the South Ozerijk, which was entrusted with the mission of the main detachment of the Soviet troops, could not gain a foothold and key functions in storming the German positions and liberating the Novorossiysk coast were transferred to the Caesar Kunikov detachment. It was Kunikov who carried out heroic leadership during the retention of the bridgehead, which was called the “Lesser Land”. However, in addition to securing to the coast, the tasks of the Kunikov detachment included receiving ammunition delivered from the sea by Soviet warships. During the reception of ammunition at night with 11 on 12 in February 1943, Caesar Kunikov was seriously wounded by a fragment of a Hitlerite mine. The major was urgently taken by boat to Gelendzhik, where the hospital was located, but the efforts of the military medics were in vain. 14 February 1943, Major Caesar Lvovich Kunikov passed away. He was only thirty-three years old - "the age of Christ."

About seven thousand people took part in the funeral of Caesar Kunikov, so much did the military and civilian people appreciate this heroic commander and beautiful person. 17 April 1943, Major Caesar Lvovich Kunikov was posthumously awarded the high title of Hero of the Soviet Union.

Who was this amazing person and for what he was so respected and even loved by colleagues? As early as December 1942, the arriving correspondent of the newspaper Pravda was commanded by the Black Sea Group of Forces Lieutenant-General I.Ye. Petrov recommended to meet with Kunikov necessarily: “an excellent commander and a good warrior,” as the military general of the thirty-three-year-old commended. Rear Admiral G.N. Bachelors, who commanded the Novorossiysk naval base, recalled Caesar Kunikov in the following way: “the mind, will, and life experience were felt in it”.

Mechanical Engineer

Meanwhile, this famous commander, to whom the military command had high confidence to lead the landing of the amphibious assault in Tsemessky bay, was not a professional military man. Before the war, he led a completely peaceful life, was an ordinary Soviet man - a civil engineer. Caesar Lvovich Kunikov was born in Rostov-on-Don 23 June 1909. His childhood fell on the years of the Civil War, which forced the Kunikov family to wander through the southern regions of Russia and even abroad. Her father, Lev Moiseevich Kunikov, was a mechanical engineer in the profession; his mother Tatyana Abramovna Kheyfets provided home comfort — she was a simple housewife. Sister Kunikova Elena Finkelstein subsequently became a famous theater expert. Together with his father, an engineer, Caesar Kunikov even managed to visit Persia. In 1920, Lev Kunikov worked in Vneshtorg and, as such, visited the Persian cities.

After the end of the Civil War, Lev Kunikov worked in Makeevka, at a metallurgical plant. In the same place Caesar Kunikov began his career. He worked as a laboratory student, mechanic, and turner at a metallurgical plant. At 16, he joined the Komsomol. When the Kunikovs family moved to Moscow, the young Caesar continued the work way of an ordinary worker - he worked as a mechanic and turner at Moscow enterprises, and in the 19-year age, in the 1928 year, he entered the Higher Naval School named after M.V. Frunze. As we can see, among many Soviet young men of that time, Caesar Kunikov dreamed of a naval service. The status of a naval officer was prestigious, and the service itself in those turbulent years allowed us to bring quite a bit of real benefit to the young Soviet power. However, in his youth, fate was not entirely favorable to Caesar. He fell ill, was placed in a hospital with perforated appendicitis, and soon he was stationed, having had only five months to go in the form of a naval cadet. That was how Caesar Kunikov’s dream of becoming a personnel naval officer ended (however, as his further biography suggests, his life in the Navy will be tied up very tightly and forever).

After serving after recovery, the emergency service as a mechanic at navy, Caesar Kunikov in 1930 returned to Moscow. He graduated from the Moscow Engineering Institute. Bubnova and the Moscow Industrial Academy, becoming, like his father, a mechanical engineer. At the same time, Kunikov actively participated in the activities of the Komsomol, even headed the defense industry sector in the Moscow City Komsomol committee. Perhaps this helped the young engineer in his professional career, although, as his subsequent life showed, Caesar can hardly be blamed for careerism in the modern sense of the word. He strove to actively participate in the formation of the machine-building industry of his homeland, and the leadership, noting his zeal and devotion to the country, put Kunikov in responsible posts. In March 1938, Caesar Kunikov became the chief technologist of the Moscow factory of grinding machines. In October, he was appointed to the post of head of the Technical Department of the People’s Commissariat of Mechanical Engineering, then he was transferred to a similar position in the People’s Commissariat of Heavy Engineering, and later became director of the Central Research Institute of Engineering Technology. At the same time, Kunikov was the editor-in-chief of the All-Union newspaper Mashinostroenie.

When the Great Patriotic War began, 31-year-old Caesar Kunikov, a well-known specialist in the field of heavy engineering, despite his years, was offered the position of Deputy Commissar for Ammunition. In those years, Stalin sought to strengthen the Soviet government with young and decent cadres, nurtured in the Soviet era. However, Kunikov could not imagine himself in a large rear position at the height of the hostilities. He persistently asked for the front. Having by this time the title of senior political officer of the reserve, Kunikov volunteered to join the army, and transferred to the Navy. About the naval service, as we know, our hero dreamed from a young age. Moreover, that he served as a mechanic in the Navy.

Water Barrage

Caesar Kunikov was appointed commander of the 14-th detachment of the water barrier of the Azov flotilla, which fought off the coast of the Azov Sea. The formation of the detachment took place in Moscow. Here, on the basis of the Water Rescue Society (OSVOD) Kunikov, and recruited a detachment at the expense of OSVOD activists. Together with Kunikov, other civilians also entered the detachment command — not the last in Moscow — the second secretary of the Baumanovsky District Party Committee, Vasily Nikitin, who occupied the post of political officer of the detachment, and the architect Veniamin Bogoslovsky, who became the chief of staff.

At the end of July, the 1941 squadron consisted of 186 fighters and was stationed in Khimki at the Dynamo water stadium, where the 21 cutter, the NKL and ZIS hydrofoil, entered its arsenal. 12 September 1941, the squad was sent to the front. In Rostov-on-Don, Caesar Kunikov’s hometown, the detachment joined the Separate Don Detachment and set about solving combat missions.

The task of the squad was to mine the entrance to the Taganrog Bay. A convenient place was the Don Delta in the Sinyavskaya region (now it is the Neklinovsky District of the Rostov Region). Here, in addition to the Don and the Dead Donets, there are numerous floodplains and ducts, very convenient for the hidden finding of boats. From the floodplains of the boat Kunikova, together with local partisans, attacked German troops at the Sinyavskaya station. The task of the detachment was to prevent the advance of German troops to Rostov-on-Don from the western direction. By rail, passing from Ukraine through Sinyavskaya, the Germans delivered military equipment, ammunition, food. From November 13 to 16, 1941, fighters of the Separate Don Detachment suffered significant damage to the enemy. Destroyed train with tanks10 trucks. As a result of the detachment’s actions, the Germans lost 500 officers and soldiers.

Nevertheless, despite the heroic efforts of the Soviet troops, the Nazis managed to occupy Rostov-on-Don on November 21 on November 1941. As winter came and the boats could no longer operate, the command decided to create a marine corps squad based on the Azov flotilla. His commander was Caesar Kunikov. The tasks of the detachment of the Marine Corps included attacks on enemy communications at the approaches to Rostov. On November 27, Kunikov’s detachment seized and held Sinyavskaya during the night, simultaneously destroying the railway track. On November 28, a Marine detachment took Sinyavskaya for the second time, establishing control over the roads and railways in order to prevent the German forces from retreating along this path. Thus, Kunikov’s fighters played an important role in the first liberation of Rostov-on-Don.

Pyotr Yakovlevich Mezhiritsky, the author of the remarkable book about Caesar Kunikove “Comrade Major”, cites the winter letter of the legendary commander to his uncle. In it, Caesar, in particular, writes about the specifics of his squad: “The squad, which I commanded, for almost 7 months at the front, were in many combat operations, battles, etc. The Nazis exterminated 1,5 times more than us fighters, lost 10 percent of their composition, replenished, well armed, well-equipped, mastered all kinds of weapons and the tactics of nighttime sabotage is our special de la meson (home specialty. - P. M.). The combat reputation of our squad in the army is good. I myself own a gun, a mortar, grenades and machine guns of all kinds and a new automatic weapon, I can mine, undermine, drive boats, drive a motorcycle and (badly) a car. I am sometimes surprised to recall that I was the director of a scientific institute, the head of a department in two people's commissariats, the editor of the central press. After the war, I can only teach my son with bayonet combat and throwing grenades lying. However, I can still teach him hatred. We are supplied with it in full ”(quoted in: Mezhiritsky P.Ya. Comrade Major. M., 1975).

For his valor during the command of a detachment of water barriers, Caesar Kunikov received the Order of the Red Banner. After the deployment of the Hitlerite offensive in the summer of 1942, the Soviet troops stationed in the Azov Sea region retreated to the south towards Taman. Detachment Kunikova followed there by boat. Upon arrival, Kunikov was appointed commander of a battalion of marines. In August 1942, in this position, Caesar Kunikov participated in the defense of the Taman Peninsula, in particular - in the defense of Temryuk. Here Kunikov received another award - the Order of Alexander Nevsky. After all, the Soviet troops on Taman fought fierce battles, almost completely destroying two Romanian cavalry divisions. A huge contribution to the defense of Taman made and marines.

Marines

However, Temryuk failed to defend. Caesar Kunikov became the commander of the 305-th separate battalion of marines, which was part of the Black Sea Group of Forces. In this capacity, he commanded the cover of the retreat of Soviet troops from Taman. The end of August - the beginning of September 1942 - the time of fierce fighting on the Taman Peninsula, in which the marines took an active part. 5 September 1942, the Soviet troops were evacuated to Gelendzhik. The retreating 305 battalion of the marines did not manage to evacuate. It seemed that he would be completely destroyed by the superior forces of the enemy. However, the Marines managed to stay in the reeds for three days, after which they were evacuated by the approaching Soviet warships.

Novorossiysk naval base was destined to play a key role in the events described and in the fate of Caesar Lvovich Kunikov himself. The base was commanded by Rear Admiral Georgy Nikitich Kholostyakov. He was a very experienced naval officer with a large and tragic biography. At the time of fighting for Taman, he was 40 years old. He was born in 1902, and in 19 years he volunteered to serve in the Workers 'and Peasants' Red Fleet. He was deputy political instructor in the company of the 2 Baltic fleet crew, graduated from the Naval Preparatory School and the Naval Hydrographic School. He served as a watch officer of the battleship Marat, a platoon commander of the naval crew, navigator of the submarine Kommunar, senior assistant commander of the submarine Proletariy, Krasnoarmeets, Batrak, L-55. In 1031-1932 was the commander of the submarine "Bolshevik". After graduating from the Tactical Courses at the Naval Academy, he continued his service as a commander of a submarine division, as commander of the 5 brigade of submarines on the Pacific Fleet. In 1938, he was arrested, sentenced to 15 years in the camps, but in 1940 he was released for lack of proof of accusation, restored to the rank and returned to service. In the Black Sea Fleet, he served as commander of the 3 submarine brigade, head of the diving department of the fleet headquarters. After the start of the Great Patriotic War, he became chief of staff, and then commander of the Novorossiysk naval base.

When the command decided to disembark in the Novorossiysk area, by the forces of the marines delivered by ships from Gelendzhik, the choice of the commander of the unit carrying out a diversion in Tsemesskaya bay became particularly relevant. Rear Admiral G.N. Bachelors chose Major Caesar Kunikove, who by this time had already recovered from the injury sustained between the Taman battles and the described preparations for the operation - the officer pressed the truck and he had to spend some time in a military hospital.

The intrepid task was entrusted to the intrepid officer — the command of the detachment who was to land in Tsemesskaya Bay. However, before the squad to lead, it was necessary to equip the most combat-ready and brave fighters. Kunikov, meanwhile, put his conditions for Kholostyakov.

First, the major demanded that the amphibious assault force and its support should be subordinated to one commander on the principle of unity of command, so that ambiguous situations did not arise during the disembarkation and the subsequent operation, which, given the importance of the planned actions, could lead to their disruption. Secondly, according to Kunikov, before disembarking, the detachment had to undergo special training, which would focus on the ability of individual actions and decision-making, not to mention combat and physical training. Thirdly, the recruitment of the detachment should have been exclusively voluntary, so that each of his Marine or commander had a clear idea of ​​the essence of the planned operation and was not a forced, obviously poorly fighting fighter. Finally, Kunikov demanded the establishment of an effective connection between the detachment and the command, including through the use of conventional signals. The rear admiral agreed with the requirements of Caesar, because he understood their importance for the success of the planned operation.

Rear Admiral G.N. The bachelors, who were responsible for the formation of the detachment, gave the order to all the subordinate commanders of the units to release volunteers who wish to take part in the operation to the detachment of Kunikov. Naturally, the commanders reluctantly did this, because they understood that the most prepared and brave fighters would leave for the detachment, but there was nothing to do - first, everyone understood the importance of the operation being prepared, and secondly, the order of the higher command. First of all, a company of intelligence officers of the Novorossiysk naval base was included in the squad of Kunikov, they also began to select the Marines from other units. At the same time, the personal qualities of a fighter and the permission of his commander allowed him to become only a candidate for selection in a squad. Caesar Kunikov himself made the selection, and here the primary role was played by whether the commander deemed the candidate ready to participate in the operation or not. And Kunikov was guided by his own life experience, since by that time he had already learned very well to understand people and to determine who he was dealing with and what each individual person was capable of in a critical situation.

During the week Kunikov scored 272 fighter. These were sailors and officers with combat experience, many participated in the battles for the defense of Sevastopol, Odessa and other Soviet cities. Special attention in the selection of officers and soldiers of the detachment was given to athletes. The battalion commander spoke with each of the applicants for service in the detachment. The most prepared and spiritually selected guys were selected. However, even for these experienced people, training in combat and physical training was organized. The training program included shooting, hand-to-hand fighting, cold weapons, physical exercises. The classes were led personally by Kunikov, who, despite his civil past, showed masterly possession of all types of weapons. Rear-Admiral G.N., the commander of the Novorossiysk naval base, personally oversaw the training of the detachment. Bachelors. More senior commanders who had heard about the training system for marines, developed by Kunikov, also came.

We can not say about those people who became the closest assistants of Caesar Kunikov in the command of the detachment. Deputy lieutenant Nikolai Vasilyevich Starshinov was appointed deputy for political affairs - deputy commander of the reconnaissance company of the Novorossiysk naval base. Captain Fyodor Evgenievich Kotanov, an experienced officer who was the battalion commander and then deputy commander of the marines, became the chief of staff. Lieutenant-captain Nikolai Ivanovich Sipyagin, commander of the 4 division of the patrol boats of the Novorossiysk naval base, was in charge of the landing. All these people were distinguished not only by great military experience, but also by their personal courage, high professionalism, which made them the best officers in their units.

The detachment structure was also focused on the specifics of the upcoming operation and is maximally adapted to ensure the mobility of the units and the ability to act in isolation from each other. The headquarters of the assault force was minimized and consisted of the head of communications (senior lieutenant VM Kateschenko), the commander of the correction post (lieutenant NA Voronkin), two radio operators, two hidden communications experts, and connected combat groups. Also in the headquarters included physicians - senior medical assistant M. Vinogradov, medical assistant I. Potapova and nurse N. Maruhno. The combat units of the detachment were five groups, in turn, consisted of branches.

Late in the evening of February 3, Kunikov’s detachment arrived in Tsemesskaya Bay. Commanding a drop-off group, Sipagin, using green and red rockets, gave signals to boats moving to the coast. At the same time, the artillery batteries of the Novorossiysk naval base commanded by Captain E.N. Shkirman. On 1.11, the landing of the landing party began. Marines landed within two minutes of the boats. Over the next ten minutes, the entire first line of defense of the German troops was crushed. Thus began the legendary landing on the “Little Land”. At 4 o'clock in the morning of February 4, second and third tier battle groups landed on the shore. 4 and 5 in February, Caesar Kunikov’s detachment held its hold. The marines fought against the superior forces of the Nazis, including tanks and infantry. Against tanks - with ATGM, against infantry - often in hand-to-hand combat. Only in 22.30 5 February came the long-awaited help. On the coast captured by Caesar Kunikov, the 255-I brigade of the marines, units of the 165-th rifle brigade and a separate parachute regiment landed. Now, the marines were not alone and the Soviet troops were able to successfully defend the captured bridgehead from the Nazi troops, ensuring the liberation of the Novorossiysk coast.

After the capture of the bridgehead, Caesar Kunikov was appointed senior naval commander in charge of disembarking and landing on ships. In parallel with the performance of combat tasks, he became an engineer, returning to his pre-war profession. No matter how tragic, but this position was the last for Caesar Lvovich. The combat officer who commanded the landings, half past the war in the detachment of water obstacles and marines, did not die in open battle, but exploded in a mine, providing unloading of tanks from ships that approached the coast. M. Vinogradova recalled: “I want to inform you about the great loss. Major Kunikov died. It happened to me, most recently. When a squad was formed, I got along with it. We completed our task, and we were removed from the front line. At night, he went to take tanks on the "Spit" and hit a German mine. He went under the shells, and one of them, hitting a minefield, blew up a mine. The fragment is very small, but it injured the bone and injured it in the lumbar region with its fragments. It happened about three o'clock in the morning, and at four I came to him, he was two kilometers from the headquarters. She tied him up, changed into clean linen and evacuated him to the hospital. They made him an operation "(Mezhiritsky P.Ya." Comrade Major ").

Memory

Caesar Lvovich Kunikov was buried in Gelendzhik at the city cemetery. After the war, he was reburied in Heroes Square in Novorossiysk. 17 April 1943, two months after his death from injuries, Major Caesar Lvovich Kunikov was awarded the title of Hero of the Soviet Union by decree of the Presidium of the USSR Supreme Soviet. Caesar Kunikov has a son, Yuri Tsezarevich, grandchildren Yuri Yuryevich and Natalya Yuryevna. Granddaughter Kunikova - Natalya Yuryevna - became the wife of the famous journalist Alexander Lyubimov.

The spouse, Natalya Vasilyevna, after the war, married Admiral George Nikitich Kholostyakov, the commander of the Novorossiysk naval base, in whose subordination was the squad of the legendary Marines. It is difficult to blame her for this, for life takes its. Georgy Nikitich Kholostyakov for a long time continued to serve in the Navy of the USSR. At the end of the war, he commanded the Danube military flotilla that liberated Yugoslavia, Hungary, Austria, Slovakia, after the war he commanded the Caspian flotilla, the 7 fleet in the Far East, and was deputy head of the combat training department of the General Staff of the USSR Navy. He retired in 1969, at the age of 67.

The fate of the Bachelors, unfortunately, was tragic. In 1983, a retired admiral and his spouse were killed by a robber in their Moscow apartment, taking possession of the admiral's uniform and the orders of the victim of crime. Professional thieves of the awards G. Kalinin and I. Kalinin 21 July 1983 came to Kholostyakov. Kalinin killed Admiral mount and his wife. At this time I. Kalinina kidnapped the admiral's jacket with the awards. Fortunately, the Soviet police worked professionally. In October 1983, the famous MUR arrested the villains. It turned out that in the meantime Kalinin had time to make a signet out of the Admiral's Golden Star. Kalinin was sentenced for his crimes to capital punishment - execution, and Kalinin - to 15 years in prison.

In the name of Caesar Kunikov, streets in Rostov-on-Don, Azov, Gelendzhik and Novorossiysk are named, a square in Moscow. Monuments and busts of Kunikov were installed in Azov, in Sevastopol, near the village of Sinyavsky on the M-23 highway between Rostov-on-Don and Taganrog. The name of Caesar Kunikov is carried by several secondary schools and gymnasiums in Novorossiysk, Tuapse, Gelendzhik, as well as the minor planet 2280. In honor of Kunikov, a large landing ship of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy was named. Caesar Kunikov was forever enlisted in the lists of personnel of the military unit 13140 (810-I separate brigade of marines). Several books and articles have been written about Caesar Kunikov, which tell about various milestones in the life of this amazing man.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    1 December 2014 08: 21
    When I read about such villains and savages of the human race who kill war heroes for rewards and profits - I sincerely regret that the death penalty was abolished in Russia !!!
  2. +2
    1 December 2014 08: 33
    However, even for these experienced people, training sessions on combat and physical training were organized. The training program included shooting, hand-to-hand combat, cold steel techniques, and physical exercises. The classes were personally led by Kunikov, who, despite his civilian past, showed masterly possession of all types of weapons.



    I read like the recollections of the Great Patriotic War veteran about Kunikov ... VERY RIGIDLY HE PREPARED PEOPLE FOR FIGHTING .... weak and unprepared cut off after the check immediately.
    But the output was very strong fighters ... with whom it was possible to complete the most difficult tasks in the conditions of complete encirclement of the enemy.
  3. +5
    1 December 2014 09: 01
    The Black Sea Fleet has a BDK, named after the heroic commander of the diversionary assault, which was intended to distract from the assault on South Ozereyka, but after the failure there, which became the main one, although no one expected that 270 people thrown "for meat" would hold out for three days ...
    PS The phrase about ATGMs at marines was guarded by ...
    And the whole article, how strange, seems to come from it that they had been preparing a springboard for the main forces for three days. Although the units that landed there are the remnants of the second and third wave of the landing on South Ozereyka, which it was decided to transfer to "small land". By the way, the units that had already landed there were left with an order to break through to the "small land". From more than a regiment, only three Marines survived and broke through.
    1. +3
      1 December 2014 09: 06
      This ochepyatka)) PTR of course
  4. +1
    1 December 2014 09: 51
    The blessed memory of the heroes is not forgotten!
  5. +7
    1 December 2014 10: 09
    The author somehow casually walked through one of the most mediocre operations carried out by the "author" of which was a scoundrel (sorry, but this is the mildest expression in relation to this person) Oktyabrsky. Also, by the way, the Hero of the Soviet Union ...
    And most importantly, the author did not indicate. Ts. Kunnikov understood perfectly that they were being sent for slaughter, that they had been written off from all accounts before the operation began, their task was to die loudly ... And everyone in his detachment understood this, but they decided to survive everything because of evil and prepared so well . They did it, but unfortunately the stupidity of Oktyabrsky brought efforts to nothing.
    PS: it is customary for us to laugh at Leonid Brezhnev, a sort of eyebrow grandfather hung with trinkets ... But of all the rulers of the USSR, he is the only one who went to war, having also been in such a hell as "Malaya Zemlya" ...
    1. +3
      1 December 2014 10: 47
      October is generally a rare shot. Passed Sevastopol, with completely unacceptable victims, conducted a number of landing operations that failed. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers and sailors and dozens of ships and ships were killed in vain and completely unjustified. Besides a coward. And the most interesting thing is that he was not only not put on the wall, but also awarded and after the war he was considered a hero. Although the veterans did not like to put it mildly ...
      PS Brezhnev was also aware of the purpose of the operation and voluntarily went for the meat.
    2. +6
      1 December 2014 11: 28
      Eugene, do not blame Oktyabrsky so much, although his guilt in the tragedy of South Ozereyka is not enough. The operation didn’t work out even from the landing on the ships, Rear Admiral Basisty is guilty of poor loading organization, it was he who commanded the landing squad. Realizing that his detachment did not have time before the start of the fire training, Basisty requested a postponement of Oktyabrsky for 1,5 hours, Rear Admiral Vladimirsky, without waiting for the order of the fleet and being the commander of the fire support detachment, gives orders to postpone the opening of fire, as a result, the artillery detachment begins flanders off the coast in front of German observers than unmasks the landing point. Having learned about the postponement in categorical form, Oktyabrsky demands to open fire according to plan, but his order reaches Vladimirsky only after 45 minutes. In general, no one notified aviation, just like the airborne assault, and they worked out as planned. Oktyabrsky’s blame for the fact that he couldn’t organize the interaction between the headquarters and the armed forces, that after learning about the success of Kunikov, he was compassionate and did not give the order to land the 2 and 3 echelons of landing in Stanichka, only a few hours later he gave such an order personally com.front Tyulenev but the element of surprise was already missed. Yeah, plus the naval command unexpectedly realized that naval artillery fire had little effect against fortified coastal positions, so most of the Germans' firing positions were not suppressed.
      1. +2
        1 December 2014 11: 45
        "Oktyabrsky's fault is that he was unable to organize the interaction of the headquarters and the combat arms, that upon learning of Kunikov's success he became cowardly and did not give the order to land the 2nd and 3rd airborne echelons in Stanichka, only a few hours later such an order gave Tyulenev personally to the front commander, but the element of surprise had already been missed. Yeah, plus the naval command suddenly realized that naval artillery fire was ineffective against fortified coastal positions, so most of the Germans' firing positions were not suppressed. "

        But wasn’t this his direct work?
      2. +4
        1 December 2014 12: 29
        Quote: Serg65
        Eugene, do not blame Oktyabrsky so much

        You know, if he was a shtafirka or a commissar like Mehlis, I could write off his mistakes for the lack of an "officer's bone" ... but ...
        Quote: Serg65
        The operation since landing on ships did not work out

        The operation has not gone well since its inception. If the aircraft itself, the fleet itself, the artillery itself, then there is nothing to blame for the weather ... For example, Caesar Kunnikov was preparing for the operation and the result of its preparation is known to everyone. Admiral Oktyabrsky reacted to the preparation of the operation as usual and received a logical result.
        Yeah, plus the naval command unexpectedly realized that naval artillery fire had little effect against fortified coastal positions, so most of the Germans' firing positions were not suppressed

        No. The fire of naval artillery is useless without adjusting the aircraft, which arrived as expected, but the fleet was late, by the time the fire opened, the aircraft had already flown away and therefore fired on the squares, wasting the trunks for nothing.
  6. +1
    1 December 2014 10: 20
    In August 1942, in this position, Caesar Kunikov participated in the defense of the Taman Peninsula, in particular in the defense of Temryuk..... but there is no street named after him in our city .. and in 1982 a monument to the soldiers of the liberators of Temryuk was demolished, the reason, they say, does not correspond to the artistic style .. and they say there is a war memorial near the general cemetery and this is enough ...
    1. +1
      1 December 2014 11: 27
      And we have. In Novorossiysk
  7. +4
    1 December 2014 10: 36
    In general, the amphibious assault operation under the Sea plan is quite interesting and, unfortunately, a failure.

    The location and procedure of the operation were determined: the main landing party landed from ships in the area of ​​South Ozereyki, distracting - in the area of ​​Stanichki. The second landing was to disorient the enemy, creating the impression of a landing operation on a wide front.

    The main landing group under the command of Colonel Gordeev consisted of the 83rd and 255th Marine Brigades, the 165th Rifle Brigade, a separate front airborne regiment, a separate machine gun battalion, the 563rd Tank Battalion, and the 29th Fighter-Anti-tank Artillery Regiment. The auxiliary landing, under the command of Major Kunikov, consisted of 275 marines without heavy weapons.

    The plan provided for a landing immediately after the front was breached under the Novorossiysk forces of the 47th Army of the Black Sea Group. The landing party was supposed to land under cover of the fire of support ships and aerial bombardment, suppress enemy resistance on the shore, connect with the landed airborne assault forces, then break through to Novorossiysk, join forces, ensure blocking and subsequent capture of the city. Due to the storm and poor organization, only the first wave and partially the second wave landed from the main landing.
    By morning, the landing of the main landing was terminated. The ships of the fleet withdrew leaving the already landed forces without cover. At this moment, the possibility of transferring the remaining forces of the main landing force to "small land" was created, but the naval command, led by Oktyabrsky, missed this moment. As a result, the Germans blocked both landing forces.
    When, nevertheless, all the forces were landed in the Stanichka area, the entire grouping on the bridgehead found itself in a "blind" defense, which it held for another three months. The bridgehead remained until September 9, when the offensive on Novorossiysk began.
    In general, the operation according to the plan "Sea", almost completely failed.
    For the mistakes of command several thousand Soviet soldiers and sailors paid with their lives.
  8. dmb
    +1
    1 December 2014 11: 13
    It was so easy and simple that the "couch generals" enlisted Oktyabrsky as a "bastard." Maybe so, but then let's give more serious arguments than failed operations. They may testify to his lack of talent or the talent of the enemy, but not to meanness and cowardice. Otherwise, everyone who allowed the Germans to reach Moscow and Stalingrad should be considered "bastards", including Stalin, Zhukov, Rokossovsky and Gorbatov.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      1 December 2014 11: 47
      Escape from Sevastopol.
      nasty argument laughing ?
      Although for the commander and naval commander, it was precisely the success of operations that measured competence. In 1943, neither Zhukov nor Rokossovsky had already fought like that.
      1. dmb
        +2
        1 December 2014 12: 31
        February 1943, secondary occupation of Kharkov. So we fought. By the way, Sevastopol was left in 1942, and not in 1943. As for the "flight", it would probably be a weighty argument even if the "couch generals" proposed a more correct way out of the situation. War is a dirty thing, and as K. Simonov rightly wrote, who knew war better than "couch" people, you cannot blind an army commander in one day.
        1. +7
          1 December 2014 13: 34
          Dmitry, the matter is not in the proposals, but in the fact that instead of organizing the defense of the city and the subsequent evacuation of the personnel, the Oktyabrsky SOR and Petrov were simply shed, leaving scapegoats and captain 3 rank scapegoats. I agree that war is a dirty thing, but you must admit that if it weren’t for war, then such military leaders as Vlasov, Pavlov, Kulik would have walked in heroes.
    3. +6
      1 December 2014 12: 47
      Quote: dmb
      It was so easy and simple that the "couch generals" enlisted Oktyabrsky as a "bastard." Maybe so, but then let's give more serious arguments than failed operations. They may testify to his lack of talent or the talent of the enemy, but not to meanness and cowardice. Otherwise, everyone who allowed the Germans to reach Moscow and Stalingrad should be considered "bastards", including Stalin, Zhukov, Rokossovsky and Gorbatov.

      Dmitry, and failed operations, isn't it a serious argument? Fear of taking responsibility for the decision to retarget the landing is not an argument? Stubborn reluctance to return to Sevastopol in October 41 under an invented pretext about the arrangement of ships' life in Caucasian bases is not an argument? Shameful flight from the same Sevastopol in July 42nd is not an argument? Oktyabrsky, being the senior chief in Sevastopol, is responsible for the stupid death of Chervona Ukrainy, for the death of the leader of Moskva, on a par with Basisty for torpedoing Molotov. The most mysterious and strange moment in the life of Oktyabrsky is the beginning of the war, starting with the fact that Oktyabrsky reports on the raid of "unknown" planes on Sevastopol to Zhukov who is at that moment in Timoshenko's office (pay attention not to the People's Commissar, but to the head of the General Staff!) Although I was obliged to inform in the first place his People's Commissar Kuznetsov! On the morning of June 22, it was suddenly discovered that the mines in Suharka were stored in an open area, although readiness number 2 was announced on June 19, and readiness number 1 was announced 3 hours before the start of the war.
      1. dmb
        0
        1 December 2014 14: 18
        Dear Sergey. Well, show me where I wrote that Oktyabrsky was Ushakov No. 2. With naval commanders, well, we are not at all really in this war. Just the fate of the country was decided primarily on land, and not at sea. By the way, and not only with us. Name at least one admiral, at least among the Germans, at least among the allies who successfully led a large landing operation or its reflection (Pacific theater does not count). The defense of Sevastopol and Odessa is also considered to be the evacuation of the latter, they are considered one of the peaks of Petrov’s military art, and the fact that Oktyabrsky was not from Stavka’s great mind there was a senior boss, it was primarily to Stavka. By the way, shameful escape could be called if he had escaped on his own initiative, because then again the Headquarters, for which you can hardly blame her. You cannot win a war by heroism alone, it also requires military art, and to conceive it during a battle is to doom yourself to defeat. You do not record 300 of the rest of the commanders evacuated with the October reptiles.
        1. +2
          1 December 2014 14: 53
          Dear Dmitry.
          Who interestingly considers "one of the heights of military art"?
          The defense of Crimea was originally built on the basis of incorrect assumptions (enemy naval and airborne assault forces). Then came a series of conflicting orders. For example, complete confusion with the evacuation (will it be uncertainty or not?). During the defense of the SoR, the command (the commander of the Sora Oktyabrsky) showed a complete inability to make decisions. As a result, demanding heroism and essentially death from the subordinates, the admiral himself escaped as soon as he received permission. Begging for a month.

          The defense of Sevastopol, especially the end of June - the first days of July 1942, is a disaster. At Cape Chersonese, only 30 soldiers and sailors were captured, and those who died and died from wounds without medical assistance from 000 to 10 according to various sources.
          But not only Oktyabrsky was to blame, all sorts of Mehlis were there, but he commanded. And he did not provide evacuation. On his orders, the underground premises of the Inkerman factory of champagne wines were blown up with everyone inside. And this is a war crime ...
          Petrov incidentally, drapanul from Sevastopol in violation of the direct order of Budyonny to stay, the benefit did not have time to get it.
          1. dmb
            0
            1 December 2014 16: 03
            Dear Ivan. Well, why put everything in a heap. Petrov commanded only the Primorsky Army, and was not at all responsible for the defense of the whole Crimea. This was attributed to Colonel General Kuznetsov. As for the defense of Sevastopol. Remember how much he stayed in the absence of supply by land, and name at least one case of this in this war. As for Petrov, I rely on Soviet textbooks on the history of wars and military art and Karpov’s book. Try to refute them. Well, the last. You give the number in 40-80 thousand people, how they could be evacuated after the fall of the Malakhov Kurgan. I repeat, I do not think Oktyabrsky is sinless, but I want to hear how you would act in such a situation?
            1. 0
              1 December 2014 16: 31
              Dear Dmitry.
              What I would have done in such a situation, I have no idea, but I'm not a regular military man, for whom this is all work.

              About defense, in general, I agree, for example, Manstein writes about the terrifying losses of personnel and equipment. Moreover, he writes that the offensive capabilities of his troops were already almost exhausted by the first of July. But what would happen if the Soviet command did not make the mistakes that were? (I know that history has no subjunctive mood) Maybe such terrible victims as in Sevastopol or before that could have been avoided in Kerch?
              1. dmb
                0
                1 December 2014 21: 27
                Agree, Ivan. In order to criticize even the same October, you need to have certain ideas about the subject of discussion. I called you those, in general, not special sources on which I am based. It would be interesting to know on what sources (except Manstein) you draw your conclusions. Judging by the roundness of the phrases (do not take it for humiliation), these are most likely to be people far from military science: Soloniny, Pravdyuki and Pivovarovs. The goal of these gentlemen is not at all true, and not even a criticism of Stalin. By their scientific nature and a large number of figures in their articles, they try to confuse their heads and drive into it a simple thesis about the meanness of Soviet power and its desire to flood Germans with corpses. Take an elementary example with the same Manstein. His terrifying losses were much easier to fill than the equally heavy losses of Sevastopol. And it was much more difficult to make up for them under the domination of German aviation. And therefore, if you are talking about mistakes, so name them, but not on the heap, namely Oktyabrsky and precisely during the defense of Sevastopol.
                1. 0
                  2 December 2014 08: 33
                  Dear Dmitry.
                  You misunderstood me)
                  I read any Solonins, but to put it mildly I was not imbued with their "vision".
                  On the defense of Sevastopol I judge mainly by books:
                  Manoshin, July 1942 The fall of Sevastopol
                  Miroslav Morozov, The Air Battle of Sevastopol 1941-1942

                  The history of the Great Patriotic War of the Soviet Union. 1941 - 1945. In six volumes. 1960 edition ...

                  Vaneev, Chronicle of Heroic Defense

                  P.A. Morgunov, Heroic Sevastopol

                  Well, a few more books of Shirokorad

                  there were publications in the Gangut magazine, on Ozereyka (I don’t remember the number, there are about landing bolinders in the landing near South Ozereyka)
                  plus heaps of online publications like this one:
                  http://sevdig.sevastopol.ws/stat/pan.html

                  About the specific mistakes of Oktyabrsky in the defense of the SoR, you have to look, I do not want to be unfounded smile
        2. +2
          1 December 2014 14: 55
          Quote: dmb
          By the way, shameful escape could be called if he had fled on his own initiative, because then again the Headquarters, for which it is unlikely to blame her.


          In the memoirs of the People's Commissar of the Navy Kuznetsov, it is directly stated that Oktyabrsky sent an encrypted message in his name with a request to allow the evacuation from Sevastopol on the night of July 4, 1942, 200-250 responsible workers and command. After the report to Stalin, after some thought, he said: "Tell Oktyabrsky and Kulakov that the Headquarters ALLOWS evacuation." It allows, and does not order, to evacuate, and then only after the request of Oktyabrsky - as they say, feel the difference ... So, based on this, the question is still for Oktyabrsky, and not for Headquarters ...
          In addition, the flight, and not the evacuation (let's call a spade a spade) of the command of the SOR meant the end of organized defense with all the ensuing consequences for its defenders ...
          Nevertheless, I was not ashamed to accept the Golden Star for my anniversary in 1965 - this is all God's dew ....
          PS, the maternal uncle, the foreman of the second article, written off from the ship ashore to the Marine Corps, went missing in Sevastopol somewhere in late June-early July 1942. Despite all efforts, his fate could not be established ...
          1. dmb
            0
            1 December 2014 16: 16
            My grandfather went missing in the Raisin-Barvenkovsky cauldron. So what do I now recall of Stalin, who forbade the withdrawal of troops, only as Svanidze? For the rest, see the comment above. Could Oktyabrsky be evacuated without an order?
  9. +2
    1 December 2014 11: 25
    Thank you for the article. Previously did not know about the civil life of Caesar Lvovich Kunikov. Bright hero.
  10. +1
    1 December 2014 12: 11
    I served at an outpost in South Ozereyevka (Ozereyka), to this day the German line of defense exists on the territory of the outpost and leaves the mountains for another 0,5 km. As far as I know, the landing in South Ossetia was merged with the Germans, but even without taking this into account, the sailors there were not many chances. I’m silent about weather conditions.
    1. +4
      1 December 2014 14: 18
      Yes, the Germans staged hell on the shore. Eventually:
      "The total losses of the landing force, according to German data, amounted to approximately 630 killed and 542 taken prisoner. It is possible that the missing 200 people drowned during the landing. At night, the remnants of the detachment divided. 75 people, led by battalion commander Kuzmin, decided to break through to Myskhako, and the remaining 25 went to They were lucky - they met partisans who had contact with the "mainland" and were soon evacuated by boats. 22 days after the landing on the Myskhak bridgehead, only five people left the main group. There was not a single tanker among those who returned ... "
      And here is the German photo after the battle:
  11. +5
    1 December 2014 14: 35
    As far as I know, the Kunikov battalion is the only one where there was a competition for enrollment (as a veteran of this battalion told me in the 80s). For the honor of serving in it there was a turn of not the least brave marines and soldiers. And the battalion was worth it: when landing on the later called "Malaya Zemlya", 276 paratroopers with symbolic artillery support of the fleet (MO-4 boats with 45-mm guns could not strongly suppress the Germans) overnight captured a bridgehead 5 km deep and almost 10 km front !!! To divide 10 km of the offensive front into 276 people (and there were also losses in battle) - then any military academy teacher will die of amazement. Suffice it to recall that in 1945, the "vaunted" US Marine Corps, during the landing on Iwo Jima, defended by 2000 soldiers (the Japanese of 1945, not like the Germans of the beginning of 1943) + 3000-4000 armed workers (an analogue of either our 1941 militia , or the German Volkssturm of 1945) lost 7000 people in a week of battles in the surf (!!! not shit not moving forward!) And this is supported by 4 aircraft carriers, 5 battleships and other cruisers and destroyers! So where are our Marines (happy holiday!) And where are those supposedly Hollywood "cool" good guys from the US Marine Corps ???
  12. +1
    1 December 2014 17: 15
    Honor and glory !!!
  13. +3
    1 December 2014 17: 56
    On Malaya Zemlya there was one more (hero) as many as five times. Today, as the races watched the film The Liberators of the Marine Corps, the episode was just about this, the Black Devils heroically fought as the Fritz called them, they were especially afraid of hand-to-hand combat, and for this they often conceded.
  14. 0
    3 December 2014 23: 21
    Thanks to the author for the article about my respected double-countryman (Rostov-Novorossiysk). An intellectual, clever and at the same time - a few fighter. They say that only those who stood in hand-to-hand against three trained fighters (rehearsal of specks?) And they still went there and there, talked to people about ordinary affairs, and kept a training grenade in their pocket, were selected into the squad. And so, as if by accident, he threw at the interlocutor's feet. Managed to drop - well done, missed - get out of the squad ..
    My personal acquaintance with the Malaya Zemlya - I walked along it enough, no one can ever gain a foothold there, much less survive! A bare and flat place like my bald head ... However, they entrenched and held on! And Leonid Ilyich made fun of plenty - but however, only for one visit then to Malaya Zemlya it is necessary to give a Hero. And thanks to him for the Star of Novoross. Stalingrad was destroyed by 80%, Novorossiysk - by 100%. And if the Germans had broken through there, Turkey would have entered the war. It's easy to guess for someone.
  15. 0
    15 May 2017 14: 13
    KUNIKOV CAESAR LVOVICH
    Thirty-three whole years - would live, love and sing.
    This is quite a bit - thirty-three whole years:
    Kunikov Caesar Lvovich black led the battle to death -
    This is what the German marines called themselves German.

    Sailors walked in vests during the day and under the gaze of stars -
    Knife, machine gun, grenades, but in reserve a cigar,
    So that an outpost would be erected on Earth on Malaya
    So that, as in the hell of a pitch, it would become hot for the Nazis.

    The guys fell to the ground, fulfilling their duty with honor:
    In black, in crosses, uniforms of corpses there was a scattering,
    Frowned from the "half a half!" in the sky of bottomless Gd
    Sinister with a scythe generously sprinkled with dew blood.

    Kunikov Caesar Lvovich was a commander, major,
    He knew the price of male friendship and officer honor,
    In grandfather's remembered books of letters of the witching pattern,
    The wisdom of Jewish tales, Don native song.
    In mortal battles, the German stronghold was crushed,
    Seagulls to the heroes sang hoarsely their ballads,
    The companies and battalions in the ranks went forward,
    And, to those who survived, Brezhnev hung awards on his chest.

    Kunikov ... - sorrow does not tolerate words,
    He fell from a random mine - he could have got a bullet from a knife.
    I would know, Major, how noisy the city is roaring Rostov,
    They rush like cars famously along the streets of paint!

    The battles of war are few dreamed in scraps of dreams -
    Time has its own code of true and precise rules.
    Kunikov Caesar Lvovich, Rostov remembers you!
    Kunikov Caesar Lvovich, Israel knows you!
    IGOR KHENTOV