Military Review

Nuland promises to lift the sanctions in exchange for the Crimea. What awaits Russia in the coming years

113
US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, who recently visited Kiev in the company of Vice President Biden, said that the lifting of sanctions against Russia is possible only after the return of the Crimean peninsula to Ukraine, reports Free press with reference to the Latvian edition "Medusa".

Nuland promises to lift the sanctions in exchange for the Crimea. What awaits Russia in the coming years


“We said that we are ready to lift the sanctions adopted in September. Of course, there were also sanctions adopted earlier in response to the Crimea. These were less serious sanctions, and they will be maintained until we can restore Ukrainian sovereignty in the Crimea, ”Nuland told a Latvian newspaper.

According to her, “the most painful sanctions”, introduced in September, can be canceled if Moscow fulfills the agreements reached in Minsk.

It seems that American diplomats do not follow the situation at all. Otherwise, they would have understood that bargaining with regard to the Crimea is inappropriate. As the Russian president said, “Our Crimea” and this is a “strategic decision”. It is hard to imagine that it will ever be audited.

What is Russia to prepare for and how to behave in this situation? The “Free Press” correspondent asked these and other questions to the senior researcher of the Russian Institute stories RAS to Andrei Marchukov.

“The statement of Nuland, like a whole series of other statements emanating from the American administration, from European officials, from German Chancellor Merkel, is in fact a banal blackmail,” said Marchukov. - The West used this blackmail in fact from February of this year, forcing Russia to abandon any policy in its interests on the territory of Ukraine (within the borders at that time), to abandon its own policy in the Crimea and Donbas.
Actually, the sanctions themselves are exactly the same nature of political blackmail. Not by chance, all these restrictions were introduced gradually, accompanied by a big hype and a big ideological campaign.
They pursue a simple goal - to take the political leadership of Russia, which is called "weak". Recently, Sergei Lavrov, speaking at a meeting of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, said about the same thing ... ”.

Correspondent: "He seems to have said that Western countries wanted to force Russia to" swallow humiliation. "

Marchukov: “And it should be noted that in part this policy of the West, which is blackmailing the Russian leadership and the Russian ruling class, has borne fruit. We remember, in particular, that the whole spring and the beginning of summer were held under such an unspoken campaign "you should not quarrel with the West for the sake of Ukraine" (here you can correct "for the sake of Donbass", "for the sake of Novorossiya", etc.)
The West, in fact, is counting on using blackmail, to which, of course, a certain part of the Russian elite is exposed, to achieve specific goals. ”

Correspondent: "What do you mean, prone?" Why?"

Marchukov: “Because a quarter of a century, in fact, since 1991, the current Russian ruling class (although it has changed in some individuals, but as a whole, like a corporation, has remained unchanged) did nothing that tried to integrate into the Western political, economic and ideological system. First of all, on a personal level - there are bank accounts, property, real estate in Europe and the USA. Here and study their offspring in prestigious European and American universities. Actually, many families live there. They, by and large, in Russia only earn money, and all their interests are there.

And besides his personal aspirations to Europe, he actively involved there, integrated the Russian Federation, what remained after the collapse of the Soviet Union, called Russia. Actively built it into Western supranational and interethnic structures, instilling liberal ideology prevailing in the West, etc.

Therefore, at times to give up all this, "then" achieved life benefits, these people do not want. Moreover, for what they will do it? For the sake of some Donbass, Crimea, New Russia?

It is clear that this environment is very favorable for the influence of the very same United States and European officials, and it is very reluctant to follow the course that the Russian president is pursuing. And Putin, as we know, has repeatedly stated that he will protect the Russian-minded population in Ukraine. What will not leave these people to the mercy of fate, at the mercy of Ukrainian nationalists and the US-Ukrainian oligarchy.

These people are very unhappy with such a policy. They are very unhappy with the sanctions, which, above all, are aimed at infringing their economic interests - not so much the interests of Russia as the state, but at infringing the interests of these corporations, including their representatives, top managers, owners, shareholders, and tons .d

In my opinion, the West rightly sees in these circles its allies, capable of influencing, and if not influencing, then, as a last resort, reviewing the entire Russian internal political context, and doing so, as beneficial to the West - the United States, Europe, etc. ".

Correspondent: “But we have kind of gone through the days when the“ seven bankers ”determined the country's policy? "

Marchukov: "Yes. The level of support for the current Russian president by the people is now as high as ever. They trust him, they hope for him.
Therefore, for Putin and for people who are, relatively speaking, his team, to turn off this course is tantamount to suicide. First, it will mean the complete collapse of their own, as a political ruling group. Secondly, it will cause outrage among the people. The surrender of Donbass, the surrender of the Crimea, which has already become part of Russia, will be perceived by society as a direct betrayal.
It is clear that neither Putin nor his associates would like to bring the situation to such a result. On the other hand, constant pressure from outside and from within the country - from the West and the so-called “sixth column” - is strongly felt. ”

Correspondent: “Recently, Russia has often been reproached for failing to comply with the Minsk agreements. But I would really like to understand what those who teach us mean when they talk about the escalation of the conflict? Full destruction by the Ukrainian army of the population of Donbass? "

Marchukov: “The Minsk agreements are primarily violated by the Ukrainian side, which is being incited by the United States. Already, the pattern is simply observed: as soon as emissaries come from overseas, shelling intensifies, military tensions increase.
What do they think Russia should do? Donate Donbass and New Russia. To stop all support, including political support, however partial it may be, and recognize Ukraine’s sovereignty over these territories. Moreover, the sovereignty in the understanding of Kiev is the most complete “cleansing”, the destruction of the dissenters and the establishment of the Bandera dictatorship.
With regard to the Russian and pro-Russian forces, such a notion as genocide is not valid and is not considered at the international level. The West will in any case applaud the actions of Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk and others. ”

Correspondent: "What to do?".

Marchukov: “Russia needs to stop this half-heartedness in relation to Donbass and Novorossia. Stop calling them South-East and East of Ukraine. To recognize the Donetsk and Lugansk people's republics, following the example of South Ossetia and Abkhazia (I think there are a number of countries that will follow Russia in their recognition), and already to build relations with them accordingly - to protect and help. Maintain economically, because you still have to save them economically from the position in which Kiev led them, destroying the entire infrastructure and people. Building relationships with the Donbas, as with a part of Ukraine, is a disastrous position. ”

Another interlocutor of the building, Head of the Center for Political Science Studies at the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Pavel Salin, suggested that the coming years will be difficult for Russia:

“The question now is that it is necessary to change the model of economic development in the new conditions. Finance Minister Siluanov said the other day that she had exhausted herself of the economic model that had been maintained in the country for the past fifteen years. Therefore, there is a question about which economic, and, accordingly, in this connection, the political model will choose Russia in the new conditions.

On the one hand, there is a mobilization model that certain circles lobby for. And there is a model of full liberalization, according to the principle of the NEP, when the economy is liberalized to the maximum, and the control and political levers remain under the supervision of the authorities (as the Bolsheviks did in their time). ”

Correspondent: “And which model is preferable?”

Salin: “Now there is a struggle around these two projects. Each provides certain chances to resist the sanctions policy, but also carries certain risks.
Nevertheless, it is absolutely certain that next year the economic model that has existed for the past fifteen years will be gone. ”

Correspondent: “Are there enough forces and resources to carry out such an important reform? The main thing: for the better, the changes will be?

Salin: “This is a basic question. As for the mobilization project, now there are far fewer human resources in Russia compared to the previous stages, when the mobilization project was with us a certain success.

The liberalization project is also a very serious risk. Because the negative scenario may repeat: economic liberalization began, and then the entire political system collapsed.
Therefore, the question is, of course, open. And the risks are very significant, given the fact that Russia is now much weaker than it was even a few decades ago.

Authorities say: get ready to tighten their belts. This is absolutely true. The question is, how tight will they have to be? I'm afraid that is very tight. ”

Correspondent: "We give the Crimea something?".

Salin: "Of course not. Such a formulation of the question is absolutely unacceptable. With the East of Ukraine there are still some compromise options. There is no way to play back here. ”
Photos used:
svpressa.ru
113 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. silver169
    silver169 28 November 2014 12: 38
    +32
    Crimea back to you? Do you want a cookie under your nose?
    1. Renat
      Renat 28 November 2014 12: 44
      +19
      Crimea was just an occasion. As the president said. And about the lifting of sanctions in exchange for the Crimea, they understand that we will not give it back, so her statement is just a concussion. No more.
      1. Natalia
        Natalia 28 November 2014 12: 50
        +25
        At the expense of half-heartedness regarding Donbass, I agree that we must stop calling the DPR and LPR Southeast of Ukraine. And to stop pretending that - well, they say, we hope that Ukraine will come to its senses and restore peace to the Donbass and everything will be as before.
        Recognize the Donetsk and Lugansk people's republics following the example of South Ossetia and Abkhazia

        100 pounds is so.

        We must also introduce new circumstances to take upon ourselves obligations for the security of the DPR and LPR. If we go against the West, then to the end. Said "A" say "B". There should be no misunderstandings.
        The territorial integrity of Banderostan is not beneficial for us, and even more so, its economic well-being is not beneficial.
        1. avg
          avg 28 November 2014 12: 55
          +9
          Already wrote once, forced to repeat. Nuland holds us for fools. He wants to breed like hozlov on buns. Let them take them home to Ferguson.
          1. FACKtoREAL
            FACKtoREAL 28 November 2014 13: 40
            +2
            Nuland holds us for fools. He wants to breed like hozlov on buns. Let them take them home to Ferguson.

            So ... hand out blacks apartheid fighters cell, watch, bucks buns in Ferguson is our responsibility Churkina belay
            1. tkhonov66
              tkhonov66 28 November 2014 15: 24
              +1
              "...
              So ... handing out blacks to apartheid fighters cell phones, watches, bucks buns in Fergusson is our Churkin’s duty
              ..."
              .
              This is the responsibility of all US INFLUENCE AGENTS like you.
              - to keep Russia "for Durkin" ...
              8-))
              .
              But - BREAK OUT ...
              8-)
            2. Rostov
              Rostov 28 November 2014 15: 34
              0
              Quote: FACKtoREAL
              it is our Churkin’s duty


              I will fully support you! And then many are enthusiastic - About how Lavrov said! Churkin is the best! Yes, there they are the best hell! Where is our foreign policy in the interests of Russia? Have you torn Ukraine apart? Spoiled! Belarus and Kazakhstan are on the way, but in fact they are also prosral! Where do we have at least one ally? Real. Which is with us in fire and water? There are no such! This is such an awesome foreign policy.
              And what does the majority behave like the inhabitants of the notorious censor? Yes we are, we are! And they are, and they are these!
              The mattresses behaved as they would like, and they will lead! Those who are older, do you remember that in Soviet times they were so borzoi? Yes, it was not even close. Now what? In fact, our power sits, puffs out its cheeks. Constant moans about what will only get worse. And what is this - the level of the minister? Where is at least one suggestion how will we overcome the current situation?
              In general, the request to visitors to this site is this - please do not behave like a censor.
              1. Alexandr73
                Alexandr73 28 November 2014 21: 17
                0
                Of course, it’s not a trace to blow cheeks, I completely agree with you, Alexander III said the best about allies and friends, the best allies of Russia are the Army and Navy. nowadays + Strategic Rocket Forces. As for Lavrov and Churkin, the guys are great, they play their part to the end. I would have looked at you in this environment, of course I don’t know about you, but I would have smashed all of this from the UN and would have kicked me out of it, so Lavrov and Churkin Well done. Further, what does Ukraine mean? And what do you suggest, send troops? But why not? so that we are to blame for everything? in all destruction and death? Donbass is not the Crimea, there is for United Krain before X .. and more, even now, when they constantly bomb.
                During the USSR and the USA, the borzoi was the same, we just knew little about it, of course, the USSR defended its interests by sending troops to Vietnam, Afghanistan, etc., and the result?
              2. Commissar of the NKVD
                Commissar of the NKVD 29 November 2014 20: 02
                0
                Quote: Rostov
                Where do we have at least one ally? Real. Which is with us in fire and water?

                Have they ever been like that? And does anyone have any?
      2. Antoshka
        Antoshka 28 November 2014 12: 59
        +11
        Yes, that's a reason. Even if Crimea were returned, then even then there would be new claims against us - well, for example, something would be required to restore something or compensation for the "lease" of the peninsula or "moral damage" or "lost profit"! Even if we do everything, we will ALWAYS be guilty, such a policy. Therefore, it is necessary to spit on their cookies! Our interests are above their Gayrop values!
      3. just exp
        just exp 28 November 2014 15: 24
        +3
        Crimea is only partly an occasion, they will remove sanctions if you give Crimea and the South-East, but only for a short time, then they will again find an occasion.
        The reason is the real dollar, Russia and China (but Russia is the initiator) of the rejection of the dollar, and this is the US Cuban’s read, they will remove full sanctions only when they divide Russia into a bunch of small states.
      4. Sergey Vl.
        Sergey Vl. 28 November 2014 15: 34
        0
        Yes, what sanctions are there for edren hair? Today it was reported that in Brisbane a hurricane with hail caused damage to the city of about 100 million US dollars. This is how nature itself avenged Russia after the so-called. "Australian hospitality". And with sanctions it will be so - God is not a fraer ...
    2. svetlomor
      svetlomor 28 November 2014 12: 49
      +24
      Quote: silver169
      Do you want a cookie under your nose?
      Let them train like this.
      1. Natalia
        Natalia 28 November 2014 12: 51
        +1
        Quote: svetlomor
        Let them train like this.

        Fuuuuu .............. not a minus, but not respect negative
        1. BARKAS
          BARKAS 28 November 2014 13: 02
          +2
          For a long time they came up with an impossible condition in advance.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. smel
      smel 28 November 2014 12: 55
      +2
      Quote: silver169
      Crimea back to you?

      From a dead donkey ears
      1. Baloo
        Baloo 28 November 2014 13: 13
        +1
        Zero hole
      2. 1812 1945
        1812 1945 28 November 2014 13: 18
        +5
        Nuland promises to lift the sanctions in exchange for the Crimea. What awaits Russia in the coming years Russia will not impose sanctions on the United States if they return Alaska (they can keep California for themselves - it will still be below sea level).
    5. Giant thought
      Giant thought 28 November 2014 13: 07
      +2
      Crimea was, is and will be Russian! Those who want to check the defense of Crimea for strength just do not envy.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. papas-57
      papas-57 28 November 2014 13: 24
      +3
      `` The lifting of sanctions against Russia is possible only after the return of the Crimean peninsula to Ukraine. '' And also Alaska - Russia, California - Mexico and Indian lands on the territory of North America to the indigenous people - Indians.
      1. Natalia
        Natalia 28 November 2014 15: 19
        +1
        Quote: papas-57
        California - Mexico

        Why the hell is California Mexico? California then - Russia
        And Texas - Mexico
        ...... and indeed representatives of the British colonies in America, it does not fit to speak without the approval of their queen.
    8. The comment was deleted.
    9. SVAROGE
      SVAROGE 28 November 2014 13: 26
      +1
      I don’t even know: either this is topological stupidity, or uncompromising naivety ...

      How do they imagine it for themselves (return of Crimea back) ....?!

      ......... ZOMBIES !!! .... without brains and without conscience ...
      1. Serzh73
        Serzh73 28 November 2014 13: 42
        +2
        Quote: SVAROGE
        I don’t even know: either this is topological stupidity, or uncompromising naivety ...

        How do they imagine it for themselves (return of Crimea back) ....?!

        ......... ZOMBIES !!! .... without brains and without conscience ...
      2. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 28 November 2014 13: 56
        +1
        US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, who recently visited Kiev in the company of Vice President Biden, said that the lifting of sanctions against Russia is possible only after the return of the Crimean peninsula to Ukraine,

        By this, Nuland showed that America does not care about Novorossiya, their main goal is Crimea! They still sleep and see their bases there. Crimea was taken away from under their noses, like a child's favorite toy. And now, in the hope of returning everything, the Americans want to take us, promising to lift their sanctions. Stupid people, they do not understand that in Russia, for this, there is a saying: "Gifts are not returned back!" tongue
        1. kartalovkolya
          kartalovkolya 28 November 2014 23: 58
          0
          So, did this Nuland visit Kiev? And they say that she was given an honorary prefix to the name Sosyura (in Russian - blowjob) and now she is Nuland-Sosyura: deserving and honored.
    10. volot-voin
      volot-voin 28 November 2014 13: 42
      +1
      Quote: silver169
      Crimea back to you? Do you want a cookie under your nose?

      No, better sanctions. Europe is more likely to bend.
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 28 November 2014 14: 06
        +4
        Quote: volot-voin
        No, better sanctions.

        America introduces and introduces its sanctions, and here's another - it stripped us of snow and took it all to ourselves: laughing
    11. TECHNOLOGY
      TECHNOLOGY 28 November 2014 13: 54
      -2
      A-a.Y-y-y.Nuland-changing Ukraine to Alaska.Not the territory of ukrainy.Nu and as a presentation-book called "Hedgehog in the Fog." The brains will go away altogether. And the fool will not help. Fool is bad, the fish is prominent!
    12. just exp
      just exp 28 November 2014 15: 22
      0
      a cookie is cultural, I have a body that is more suitable for this, though I have to cover her face with a newspaper.
      1. Viktor Kudinov
        Viktor Kudinov 28 November 2014 16: 39
        0
        Yes, cover your face - and so beat it with this organ so that all the nonsense comes out of Nuland, and so that after that it begs us on her knees, so that Russia takes Alaska into the ass, returning the handful of beads that the empress had received for her. bully
    13. alien50
      alien50 28 November 2014 16: 34
      0
      Crimea to you, su ka?
      And you don’t want to scoop up your mouth, scum? am
    14. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 28 November 2014 22: 52
      0
      Quote: silver169
      Crimea back to you? Do you want a cookie under your nose?


      Yesterday I did not bring you a bouquet of red roses ... In general, that's right. A cookie must be pushed into her so deeply that her mouth wouldn’t break.
  2. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 28 November 2014 12: 38
    +27
    Somehow like this...

    Now it’s clear why there are so many fagots in Europe.
    1. 0255
      0255 28 November 2014 12: 55
      +10
      EU Buthead Headhunter Reminds wassat
    2. kartalovkolya
      kartalovkolya 28 November 2014 13: 20
      +8
      You won’t be overjoyed at such a hungry year and a bag of potatoes! It seems that in the West the unsatisfied women rule the ball!
    3. SAXA.SHURA
      SAXA.SHURA 28 November 2014 13: 21
      +4
      Urgently need to make her teeth, and if it does not work out, then knock everything out.
      1. Raphael_83
        Raphael_83 28 November 2014 15: 29
        +1
        Only a file will help here, and if he cannot cope ... then life-giving euthanasia remains. laughing
  3. Dazdranagon
    Dazdranagon 28 November 2014 12: 38
    +14
    NATO also promised not to expand ... Crimea IS OUR POINT! bully
    1. Renat
      Renat 28 November 2014 12: 46
      +7
      They promised in words. And on Gorbi’s ear. Even if it were documented, it would not mean anything. An example is the story of the Mistrals.
  4. zloybond
    zloybond 28 November 2014 12: 39
    +6
    I don’t understand the point of listening and commenting on the screech of some kind of cliché that has absolutely nothing to do with our country, and what’s the matter with her opinion ???????
    1. Per se.
      Per se. 28 November 2014 13: 22
      +7
      Quote: zloybond
      and in general, what do we care about her opinion?
      It is obviously high time for us to draw conclusions. First, they will be "friends" with us only if Russia is on the rights of a protectorate, which means that there is no place for us in their "celebration of life", and we need to look for our own path of development, for example, by returning to socialism. Second, as long as there is Bandera Dill, there is also a problem in Crimea, the "independent Ukraine" project itself, this is a deliberately hostile project to Russia, since there is a historical territory of Russia and ethnic Russians, the denial of this generates an antipode in all perversions of Bandera. The sooner we recognize Novorossiya, expand it by returning Kiev, the better. The West, having lost a foothold at our borders, will become weaker, and we, having eliminated the Bandera regime and returning our historical lands, will become stronger. But, if there is enough intelligence and political will to bend your line, maybe on the verge of a foul. In any case, you have to do something with Dill before it's too late.
  5. Abbra
    Abbra 28 November 2014 12: 39
    +2
    But ho ho not huh hu? The funny thing in this situation is that US politicians, as I understand it, do not get into the situation at all.
  6. RUS96
    RUS96 28 November 2014 12: 39
    +8
    Fool. Do not drink fried potatoes with sweet Coca-Cola, it is dangerous for the brain. wassat
  7. Waroc
    Waroc 28 November 2014 12: 40
    +3
    This she shows what Obama .......
    1. Dormidont
      Dormidont 28 November 2014 12: 49
      +1
      Haha. It looks like it's not worth discussing this "cookie".
      1. Penelope
        Penelope 28 November 2014 13: 18
        +1
        We don’t need cookies from Nuland.
  8. s30461
    s30461 28 November 2014 12: 41
    +3
    Nuland? Who is it? The distributor of confectionery from the Maidan? And is she deciding something ???
    1. Renat
      Renat 28 November 2014 12: 47
      0
      Those who decide all this we do not know. Just guess.
  9. _my opinion
    _my opinion 28 November 2014 12: 43
    +1
    Nuland promises to lift the sanctions in exchange for the Crimea. What awaits Russia in the coming years

    .... Russian people and the territory of the cookies do not change.
  10. bmv04636
    bmv04636 28 November 2014 12: 44
    +1

    And the nulands have enough cookies. As the saying goes, our Crimea, but about Alaska, the question of questions as I remember sang laughing
  11. Wolka
    Wolka 28 November 2014 12: 45
    +3
    Nuland would rather be preoccupied with pacifying the Nigers in her garden than demanding that dill never belonged ...
  12. ava09
    ava09 28 November 2014 12: 46
    0
    A funny and bitter headline, a key phrase: "Nuland promises." Nuland offers Russia to give its territory to Turkey, a NATO member, and free of charge, because the Jewish-Anglo-Saxon elite never changed their rule: - "To whom I owe, I forgive everyone."
  13. mig31
    mig31 28 November 2014 12: 48
    +1
    A merchant, in a word ... No mind, no honor, no conscience ......
  14. Vend
    Vend 28 November 2014 12: 48
    0
    So the US has openly revealed its interests. Bummer with a military base in the Crimea. Shish to you and not Crimea. And sanctions, you can choke on them, so you choke laughing
  15. 54RG3
    54RG3 28 November 2014 12: 48
    +9
    A male genital organ on the collar is not hoho? And in general, the West itself owes us (RB) the sea itself.
  16. lom
    lom 28 November 2014 12: 49
    0
    guys, I think if we are tortured by the United States, let’s start the crust of bread is dry at that moment, offering our state to deliver a nuclear strike in the United States
  17. Andrey77
    Andrey77 28 November 2014 12: 49
    0
    Is she really a fool or is everything like that in the Obama administration? Another president will replace Obama, and who will need you? It’s even a shame for the USA ...
  18. ALABAY45
    ALABAY45 28 November 2014 12: 50
    +1
    "after the return of the Crimean peninsula to Ukraine"
    Can you take "cookies" ?! Good, with cannabis. Half a pack on an empty stomach .... and you are already at "work", in the State Department ...
    1. Andrey77
      Andrey77 28 November 2014 12: 53
      +2
      There were people in the US State Department at the time of Nixon, not like the current tribe.
  19. Dedjara
    Dedjara 28 November 2014 12: 52
    +4
    Ah, well, how insulting these creatures are for Crimea!
    There would be an opportunity, they would ... well, given!
    Fuck you, monkey democracy lovers!
    I'd rather live on potatoes with moonshine, smiling at your sanctions.
  20. ODERVIT
    ODERVIT 28 November 2014 12: 53
    +1
    So with the sanctions came clarity. They will not be canceled when. We will proceed from what we have and rely only on ourselves. Crimea is a Russian region, it is an axiom.
    1. Andrey77
      Andrey77 28 November 2014 12: 55
      0
      America is not discovered. Europe has become a bargaining chip. However, she is not used to it.
  21. Vishnevsky
    Vishnevsky 28 November 2014 12: 53
    +1
    Yeah! Cancel! This whole story with Ukraine was conceived against Russia, and not in order to bring Ukrainians into a large and friendly European family, where there is no corruption, an honest court with officials and complete democracy, as svidomye imagined standing on the Maidan.
    1. Andrey77
      Andrey77 28 November 2014 12: 59
      0
      Thoughts are deeper. Europe now is a monkey that drags from the fire ... Who are the sanctions being hit? In the USA? Haha In Russia? Haha
  22. fedor13
    fedor13 28 November 2014 12: 53
    0
    The pie will crack !!!
  23. nivander
    nivander 28 November 2014 12: 54
    +1
    even without cookies this time there were
  24. Humpty
    Humpty 28 November 2014 12: 55
    +1
    Let him go to Matsu in the Ukrainian government, of course, if the rabbi allows. There is nothing for them to get into Russian affairs. We did not call her to us. In general, I would like to hear from sensible Jews what is the reason that there are so many Russophobes among politicians of Jewish origin.
  25. dimdimich71
    dimdimich71 28 November 2014 12: 55
    +10
    Deb ... they'll probably only understand that ...
  26. ajkapojka
    ajkapojka 28 November 2014 12: 55
    -1
    Suck me off, maybe Crimea will return to Ukria. Ok ?! wassat
    1. ARES623
      ARES623 28 November 2014 13: 38
      0
      You are probably the main manager of the Crimea? Isn’t it hard?
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. Hell's Angel
    Hell's Angel 28 November 2014 12: 56
    +1
    Yeah, what about Ukraine! We know who we want to return to.
    Pancake! Are they serious? All right, the Americans would believe this "bullshit". "Well, stupid!"
    But to us!
  29. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 28 November 2014 12: 57
    +3
    Damn them with these sanctions .. Our main Crimea! Worse than in the 90s will not ... Break through and even break the US ridge (not necessarily by military means)
    1. Andrey77
      Andrey77 28 November 2014 13: 01
      -1
      Break the US ridge ... and the breaker won't fall off? Go down from the clouds. Underestimation of the opponent’s forces leads to defeat.
      1. kartalovkolya
        kartalovkolya 28 November 2014 13: 31
        -1
        Eh, are you a pessimist or trying to stand up for your employers ?! Yes, we will not break anyone's backbone, in principle, they have already broken it. Look at what is happening now in the United States and it is not over yet, there will still be. As the Russian revolutionaries used to say: "A flame will kindle from the Spark," and the USA will sparkle in full! Nobody can stop the course of history, even the true masters of America, but they can slow down for a while, and then what !?
        1. Andrey77
          Andrey77 28 November 2014 14: 01
          0
          And then the Chinese will take the wheel. I try to take a sober look, but it doesn’t work ... My native country is wide, they sang like that in 1939. And in 1941 Germany reached Moscow. Now everything is generally confusing, the United States cannot control the Saudis.
  30. 538246
    538246 28 November 2014 12: 57
    +2
    Every potentate that has a single ground army has one hand, and which the fleet has, both hands.
    Peter I

    So we will increase the strength in the warm seas.
    1. Andrey77
      Andrey77 28 November 2014 14: 12
      +1
      We are trying. We lower them to the chassis one by one ... There aren’t enough slipways, well, workers too.
  31. Underwood
    Underwood 28 November 2014 12: 59
    0
    It is hard to imagine that it will ever be audited.
    Not that difficult. With a radical change in foreign policy, which is possible only after a liberal rascal comes to the leadership as a result of: a) physical elimination of the leader and bringing the "elite" to obedience; b) a forceful change of power as a result of an analogue of the Maidan.
    Well, or the extraction of Crimea by direct military intervention, which in itself is ridiculous.
  32. v245721
    v245721 28 November 2014 13: 00
    +1
    just as the Kuril Islands do not know the Japanese, the Crimea cannot be seen by the ukrofashists. and stop paying attention to any nonsense rushing from the psycho hospital.
  33. scarp
    scarp 28 November 2014 13: 00
    +12
    Yes, what awaits Russia. Normally. Accustomed. But what awaits Omerika is another question.

    (clickable)
    1. dimdimich71
      dimdimich71 28 November 2014 13: 46
      +3
      Russia is not discouraged ...
    2. APASUS
      APASUS 28 November 2014 22: 50
      +3
      Quote: Scarp
      Yes, what awaits Russia. Normally.

      Russian hamsters!
  34. vovan089
    vovan089 28 November 2014 13: 01
    +1
    Another nye in a woman's guise claims to be a "peacemaker". You need to get medical treatment in the appropriate clinic for the insane.
    1. Andrey77
      Andrey77 28 November 2014 13: 04
      0
      With psaki they get along in the ward. lol
  35. The comment was deleted.
  36. Nitarius
    Nitarius 28 November 2014 13: 02
    +15
    IT IS TIME TO THINK AND BEGIN WITH THE USA - to demand the return of Alaska! Of Russia
    And this is a PRINCIPAL QUESTION ----- DO NOT PAY FOR IT!
    1. Andrey77
      Andrey77 28 November 2014 13: 08
      +2
      All lands discovered by Columbus belong to Portugal. America including.
      1. tolancop
        tolancop 28 November 2014 13: 39
        0
        Why Portugal? Comrade Columbus seemed to be swimming at the expense of Castile ...
        1. Andrey77
          Andrey77 28 November 2014 13: 47
          0
          At whose expense, it does not matter. Well, Spain.
        2. dimdimich71
          dimdimich71 28 November 2014 13: 50
          +5
          Yes, you need to think ....
  37. BOB044
    BOB044 28 November 2014 13: 03
    +1
    Crimea back to her, Obama spit. I am also the arbiter of history. He will die and no one will remember who she was, and Crimea was and will be Russia for centuries.
  38. Vasily Ivashov
    Vasily Ivashov 28 November 2014 13: 05
    +1
    “Nevertheless, it is absolutely certain that next year the economic model that has existed for the last fifteen years will go away.” - This is what I would like to hear over the past few years. And in connection with the above, Putin's speech before The Federal Assembly, perhaps it will be there that the new course will be announced.
  39. 3vs
    3vs 28 November 2014 13: 07
    +1
    "It is a sin to laugh at sick people!" ((C) "Prisoner of the Caucasus")
  40. rennim
    rennim 28 November 2014 13: 07
    0
    Marchukov: “Russia needs to stop this half-heartedness regarding Donbass and New Russia. Stop calling them Southeast and East Ukraine.

    I completely agree. But it is very difficult to predict further events. On the other hand, it is already clear that the situation in its current form is gradually worsening. and for the Russian Federation. No one will stop the sanctions and pressure. And what is happening now can be years, if not decades. An example of Transnistria, N. Karabakh, etc. .. Therefore, it is necessary to make informed, but quick decisions. People want to live normally , and not endure for years that everything will work out by itself.
  41. x.andvlad
    x.andvlad 28 November 2014 13: 08
    0
    Nuland promises to lift sanctions in exchange for Crimea. What awaits
    Russia in the coming years

    All this is an empty verbiage of the Americans in favor of their lures. The USA is an empire of lies and hypocrisy.
    I agree with the GDP that Crimea was only a suitable excuse for sanctions. Yes, Russia will need to work hard in the coming years. But, at the same time, everyone should cut it on their nose: Crimea is Russia. And it is not discussed. And if someone snoops in there, even led by a mattress, they wash themselves with snot and yushka to their full height.
  42. sv-georgij
    sv-georgij 28 November 2014 13: 08
    +2
    We will give Crimea, fail Donbass and turn into a floor rag about which sundry will wipe their feet. Once this was already betrayed by those who fought in Afghanistan, betrayed to Najibul, betrayed the old Khnekir, betrayed Jaruzelsky and what they received. Now slurp.
  43. sledge
    sledge 28 November 2014 13: 08
    0
    First let Alaska be returned to us, and we will think about how to shave them with the Crimea
    1. Andrey77
      Andrey77 28 November 2014 14: 16
      0
      Alaska was sold. Alas. Challenge a deal in arbitration?
  44. klavyr
    klavyr 28 November 2014 13: 09
    +1
    Nuland promises to lift sanctions in exchange for Crimea
    - ha ha ha! the goal of the Maidan was-Crimea! try take it! take a chance stsukko!
  45. Sirocco
    Sirocco 28 November 2014 13: 09
    +5
    Gentlemen, we are not talking about that. It is clear and understandable that our Crimea is on the collar and not concessions in this matter. Everyone missed what was written at the beginning of the article.
    They (the Elite and businessmen), by and large, in Russia only earn money, and all their interests are there.

    This is who the US and companies are betting on, so this is where the trick is coming from, the US will not go head on, they are betting on a breakthrough from the backyard. Well, the People, that is, we are praised for this Elite, a means of earning money, and nothing more. A million more, a million less, for them it’s zilch. And money and influence in the world is all. So, it’s not about Crimea that you need to worry about, but about the Elite that uses us for their own purposes, and who will do everything to raise a riot on the ship. You can’t give her this chance, it’s better to drink some bread and some water than to shed blood. And the wars in Russia are very bloody, as history shows.
  46. soivmser
    soivmser 28 November 2014 13: 10
    0
    A kilo of cookies are in your mouth, not Crimea!
  47. PValery53
    PValery53 28 November 2014 13: 10
    +2
    Give Crimea to Khokhlyandiya, and it will “pay off” with amers for cookies with Crimea. Interesting "gesheft". Isn't it more profitable to send amers to ... or to ...?! - They belong there. They were completely cleaned up. Announce amer retaliatory sanctions on spacewalks and on the supply of titanium units to Boeing before the return of Alaska. And to return 50000 sq. Km of Pacific waters under our jurisdiction!
  48. SEK
    SEK 28 November 2014 13: 10
    0
    First, give Crimea to them and then they will come for the Kuril Islands, Sakhalin, the Caucasus, Siberia. They need our complete surrender, after which they will take over China and India. But instead of helping us somehow, China maintains neutrality, and it also has its own gesheft with us in the form of contracts for the supply of our hydrocarbons that are advantageous to it. We will resist and fight, and the cross-eyed West will quickly pump up.
  49. Throw
    Throw 28 November 2014 13: 10
    +1
    Why listen to bullshit and rhetoric? But you never know what there says some kind of victim of the Russian sailors ..))
    We are Russia. Not Europe or Asia. We have our own goals, values, economics and politics.
    Who wants to cooperate - welcome. And whoever will interfere with life or come with a sword will get in the mouth! am
  50. Flinky
    Flinky 28 November 2014 13: 12
    +4
    It's time to turn on the repressive machine. I was hoping that things would not be limited to Yevtushenkov ... Maybe I hope not in vain? And maybe I will see a red-headed thief dangling in a loop?
    1. SVAROGE
      SVAROGE 28 November 2014 13: 29
      +1
      SUPPORTED, at all 1000% !!!!
    2. Andrey77
      Andrey77 28 November 2014 14: 06
      -4
      A repressive machine will hit you first. Standing aside will not work.