Sticker contest. Voting

162

What would you like to see in the rear window of the car (you can choose several options)

1 Option - 1158 (25.01%)
25.01%
2 Option - 245 (5.29%)
5.29%
3 Option - 138 (2.98%)
2.98%
4 Option - 315 (6.8%)
6.8%
5 Option - 618 (13.35%)
13.35%
6 Option - 77 (1.66%)
1.66%
7 Option - 113 (2.44%)
2.44%
8 Option - 840 (18.14%)
18.14%
9 Option - 1122 (24.23%)
24.23%
We have selected the best of the set of sent stickers options and suggest voting for the final version.

Option 1

Sticker contest. Voting


Option 2




Option 3




Option 4



Option 5



Option 6



Option 7



Option 8



Option 9

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    162 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +23
      24 November 2014 06: 46
      Option 5, concise and conspicuous. For indentation in motion - that’s it.
      1. +23
        24 November 2014 06: 58
        I liked the most first option-BUT, the center of the logo is overloaded with detailsso I chose options 8 and 9 ...
        1. +19
          24 November 2014 07: 04
          Quote: mirag2
          I liked the most first option-BUT, the center of the logo is overloaded with detailsso I chose options 8 and 9 ...

          Similarly! good But I will vote for the 9th option! Simple and recognizable for site members.
          1. +16
            24 November 2014 09: 05
            Guys, well, you can’t give preference to someone in such an emblem! Aviation, of course, is cool, but ... And then where are the sappers! Or, for example, combat swimmers ?! We have served and are serving in various branches of the armed forces; we have a variety of military specialties. Therefore, we need a generalized emblem, suitable for everyone, and not just our glorious Air Force ...
            1. +8
              24 November 2014 09: 50
              It is truth too!
              Why, by the way, is there no "polite people" in the variants, the Ministry of Defense has patented?
              I somehow like their emblem.
              1. +12
                24 November 2014 10: 12
                In short, there is no option that would catch the eye immediately and stand out among others. recourse
                1. +7
                  24 November 2014 11: 10
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  there is no option that would catch the eye immediately and stand out among others.

                  Comrad, well, no, so there is no "king" among the visitors of the resource, which is upset. Patriotism is in the majority as: "Log-ax-log".
                  Malevich does not give you peace or Picasso, what are your personal preferences? wink (purely curious)
                  Administration missed No. 8 and how to evaluate it?
                  How subtle trolling of patriots or common banter over polytech economic realities?

                  In my opinion, you need to continue the competition (for a month) and raise the topic to the main page every day. Remind comrades and stimulate creative patriotism in them and someone will create a "tasty" logo for me Stars and AK (I myself am a complete zero in the arts).
                  And in the New Year holidays to hold the final vote.
                  drinks
                  1. s1н7т
                    +3
                    24 November 2014 12: 21
                    I agree with the star, but, really, there should not be a white hole in it.
                    1. 0
                      24 November 2014 13: 57
                      The 8 number is promising, but you need to change the tank to Armata and the planes on the Su-35 and T-50, and add details and colors.

                      The rest frankly lose, only 1 is a powerful picture, probably even too much.
                      1. 0
                        21 December 2014 13: 44
                        I really liked options 1, 4, 7 and 9. In the beginning I wanted to vote for option 9 (where the star and silhouette of the PAK FA blend beautifully), but because of the greater variety I chose option 1. wink
                    2. -1
                      29 November 2014 22: 56
                      I agree, white holes are NOT OUR
                  2. +1
                    24 November 2014 13: 11
                    Quote: Papakiko
                    Star and AK logo

                    so this is special forces smile the truth is there is still a fist, but I think the association is one! smile
                    and so, I support the logo, which will not be a solid canvas. those. name, link to the site, well, minimal background with the site logo! he himself is not an artist, but extra lines or some kind of filler seem to me to be off topic.
                    for fun: out, a newbie driving, what an informative sticker! laughing the background is true too, but for that without extra lines ... laughing
                    1. +1
                      24 November 2014 18: 16
                      Quote: SpnSr
                      but I think the association is one

                      Have you seen a lot of cars with "VV specialists" stickers?
                      And how many variations from the AK images (darkness) ?!


                      1. 0
                        26 November 2014 14: 57
                        This is the BB mark. Let them stay. Nice guys. Here you need a sign to generalize. I think so
                    2. 0
                      24 November 2014 18: 35
                      Quote: SpnSr
                      and so, I support the logo, which will not be a solid canvas. those. name, link to the site, well, minimal background with the site logo! he himself is not an artist, but extra lines or some kind of filler seem to me to be off topic.

                      Categorically true and exactly!
                      Quote: SpnSr
                      there, a newbie behind the wheel, what an informative sticker

                      Its purpose is to "scream"!

                      And in the case of VO, it should be informative, practical and provocative of interest and imitation. It should be original and encourage the desire to stick it on.
              2. 0
                24 November 2014 12: 13
                The key is
                Quote: exiv200gt
                the ministry of defense has patented?


                So you need to either pay or get permission!
                1. +1
                  24 November 2014 13: 45
                  Quote: Rus2012
                  The key is
                  Quote: exiv200gt
                  the ministry of defense has patented?


                  So you need to either pay or get permission!

                  Who has a ministry connection? laughing
            2. 0
              24 November 2014 14: 13
              I still have an idea such that emblem 9 on the slightly back left side of emblem 8 without an image f-18 (a tank with the site name and link remains) and a little behind and to the right a couple of complexes! yes, as without complexes laughing
              and so the task f-18 is solved and the emblem is somewhat filled
            3. 0
              25 November 2014 06: 01
              Well, in this version, as it seems to me, the combined arms emblem of the USSR Armed Forces is quite suitable. Recognizable by all.
            4. 0
              3 December 2014 11: 53
              Quote: Jovanni
              Aviation, of course, is cool, but ... And then where are the sappers! Or, for example, combat swimmers ?!
              I share your discontent, BUT at the moment we are with you on a resource whose emblem is PAK FA. And if the sticker is to inform about the "Military Review", then the site's logo should be used. And if we cram all types of troops into a sticker, then at the output we will get a picture even more overloaded than Option 1.
              From afar, on the road, the most striking options are 9 and 5.
          2. +4
            24 November 2014 09: 55
            Quote: Starover_Z
            Similarly!

            Quote: mirag2
            so I chose options 8 and 9 ...

            Comrades, "I am wildly sorry", but No. 8 with flying F-18 "super hornets" - Well, it’s not that BURDENING, but clearly doesn’t lick into the garden (how did the administration miss? A reprimand in the chest ).
            Quote: Baikal
            The full version of number 5 is in detail here:

            I don’t think that on this the flight of creativity among the comrades was limited (This is, in general, according to the presented options), but from the whole proposed No. 5 meets my personal wishes for what I would place on my car (lisoped). Of course it would be better Temko stars and AK... The latter in many countries is associated with freedom, patriotism, and so on. coupled with a complete opposition to the imperialist capitalist aspirations of "developed democratic countries."
          3. +2
            24 November 2014 16: 31
            Quote: Starover_Z
            I will vote for the 9th option! Simple and recognizable for site members.

            Join.
          4. 0
            24 November 2014 22: 05
            I liked the first one, but I wouldn’t stick it on the car, because the drawing is overloaded with details. I would paste 8 or 9 with pleasure on the car brother tanker)))
        2. +2
          24 November 2014 12: 09
          Quote: mirag2
          chose the options 8 and 9 ...

          Guys, with all due respect, the wrong STAR, especially a cripple on one ray - this is a hint of a "fallen star" or a sign of a "fallen angel" ...

          You need to be careful in signs and meanings and choose carefully !!!
          1. +5
            24 November 2014 12: 24
            Quote: Rus2012
            You need to be careful in signs and meanings and choose carefully !!!

            Once upon a time, in order to combat drunkenness, two knights were depicted on the label of a bottle with "Russkaya". The vodka was nicknamed "two are looking for a third." You're right. Therefore, I did not vote. I agree with those who suggest taking your time with the competition and extending it. Looks like it's not yet time. We have enough talents.
            1. +4
              24 November 2014 12: 29
              Quote: There was a mammoth
              I agree with those who offer not to rush into the competition and extend it.


              ...I agree!
              Only, you need those LOGOs that scored big points - hang out and discuss "+" and "-", so at least it will become clear where to move ...
              1. +1
                24 November 2014 12: 36
                Quote: Rus2012
                ... post and discuss "+" and "-" ...

                I will be upset if I stop at any of these options. Although, in almost all variants there is something that may please not only those who are "attached" to the site.
          2. +1
            24 November 2014 22: 08
            Quote: Rus2012
            You need to be careful in signs and meanings and choose carefully !!!

            Moreover, OUR, live in different countries, and sometimes THERE do not like either stars or St. George's ribbons, no need to "burn" our friends !!!
            1. 0
              29 November 2014 07: 36
              And here I strongly disagree! The St. George ribbon is a symbol of the victories of our ancestors, and now it is also a symbol of denial and the fight against ukrofashism (not for nothing that Svidomo reacts to it like a vampire for garlic) so what are we going to hide it so as not to scorch ?! Are we underground?
              It is necessary that in addition to belonging to VO, the sticker clearly SCREAMED about our position, therefore, I think the St. George ribbon (as in var.1) and the star (as in var2 symmetric, red and completely filled) + details and site name and slogan (var .5 is not bad at all) must be present MANDATORY.
        3. +2
          24 November 2014 12: 44
          Quote: mirag2
          I liked the most first option-BUT, the center of the logo is overloaded with detailsso I chose options 8 and 9 ...

          of the same opinion, also supported it!
        4. +1
          24 November 2014 16: 53
          If you slightly revise the first option, remove the extra parts, it would be ideal. And so, option 9 is more concise and correlates with the already accepted and familiar logo. But again, you need a performance similar to options 3 and 5 - contour lines on a transparent background, so as not to clutter up the glass.
          From creative, option 3 is not bad.
        5. 0
          24 November 2014 19: 23
          Quote: mirag2
          I liked the most first option-BUT, the center of the logo is overloaded with detailsso I chose options 8 and 9 ...

          may be overloaded, but I liked it ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +1
        24 November 2014 08: 17
        4,8,9 are optimal!
      4. +5
        24 November 2014 08: 37
        Mentor, thanks.
        Full version of the number 5 in details here:

        http://nakleyka.wmsite.ru/konkurs_VO
        1. +1
          24 November 2014 08: 41
          Second, do not forget about the transparency of the rear window ....
          And it’s not very overloaded, by the way, at the second bottom you can make a ribbon as a foundation, but not very wide.
          the size of 200x200mm is more than enough for a passenger car; it will look more like a clear advertising, and not as a commitment to the site
          1. +3
            24 November 2014 08: 54
            From the point of view of convenience of recognition is definitely the ninth option.
            It can be done with or without a transparent background.
            The first is good, yes, but it is clearly overloaded. It will look like a dirty spot.
        2. +1
          24 November 2014 12: 21
          Quote: Baikal
          The full version of the 5 number in detail here

          Excellent!:)
          Still on a baseball cap, pen, lighter ... i.e. a full set of LOGO on representative things ...
          1. -1
            25 November 2014 08: 38
            As needed - why not :)
            What was done was not related to the topic of stickers, but to the topic of "modernization" of the entire Military Review. Because, I'm sorry, they are outdated, we must move on wink The link made is a kind of "Armata", which can be used for everything else - a website, a sticker, a T-shirt, etc.
        3. +2
          24 November 2014 12: 36
          Thanks for the presentation + (http://nakleyka.wmsite.ru/konkurs_VO)
      5. 0
        24 November 2014 12: 01
        The first option is right for me, it saved what I was used to and added the St. George ribbon and the globe shows that global events covering the whole world are covered here smile
      6. 0
        24 November 2014 12: 01
        The first option is right for me, it saved what I was used to and added the St. George ribbon and the globe shows that global events covering the whole world are covered here smile
      7. +4
        24 November 2014 12: 06
        Quote: Mentor
        Option 5, concise and conspicuous. For indentation in motion - that’s it.

        Support!
        Simple and concise!

        PS: for those who write in VO - would introduce a sign -
        "PRESS" and this LOGO
        + press badges from site managers.
      8. +2
        24 November 2014 12: 59
        Quote: Mentor
        concise and noticeable.

        Dear colleague, all pictures are visible. Some are not very concise. But in the first message about the start of the contest, I asked the moderators a question about the size of the sticker. Is it possible that even a laconic but large sticker will simply interfere with the driver? And for the same reasons, it should be as transparent as possible. Again, merchants with striped sticks will dig to the big sticker, as before a pillar! There is nothing to feed them, let them lose weight! And the rest - all the pictures are decent. In my opinion, a little worse than 6 and 7. But there is plenty to choose from, and there is no need to rush to the winner. The idea should mature a little and mature.
      9. 0
        24 November 2014 18: 51
        Only the slogan "Be aware, be ready" ..... IMHO to nothing. It only spoils completeness and brevity.
      10. 0
        25 November 2014 16: 57
        Better 1st option.
      11. 0
        26 November 2014 14: 51
        Flip the words - it will be SVD!
      12. 0
        26 November 2014 15: 12
        With a sight pinned! More precisely, only with the details! Offset.
    2. wanderer
      +4
      24 November 2014 06: 48
      ----- The 1st option is recognizable and familiar.
      ----- The St. George ribbon obliges a lot, VICTORIES of our army are associated with it.

      Good luck to everyone.
      1. +3
        24 November 2014 06: 52
        Also for the first option-solid, informative, dignified!
      2. +2
        24 November 2014 13: 22
        I carefully looked at all the options, it seemed that in option 1, both option 8 and option 9 were included.

        Voted for 1 option!
    3. +5
      24 November 2014 06: 53
      1st and 9th, the rest is not very .... but the size is annoying, maybe it should be reduced? but not that problems with the review will arise, there are no options elongated in the horizon, so that the glass is placed up for example. what The 9th version attracts a look familiar for several years, it is recognizable, and the color palette is also not bad, you can pick it up to the car. good Thank you for your work! (By the way, the 4th option suggests the similarity with the US Air Force emblem ...)
      1. +2
        24 November 2014 09: 36
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        (by the way, the 4th option suggests the resemblance to the US Air Force emblem ...)

        And the 6th option, with all due respect to its author, can be offered for the Chinese or North Korean version of the site.
    4. -2
      24 November 2014 06: 55
      Option 8 only in the current color
    5. -1
      24 November 2014 07: 00
      I liked 8 I voted for him. good
    6. +3
      24 November 2014 07: 11
      Option No. 9, if passed, will be recognizable ...
    7. +9
      24 November 2014 07: 12
      "What would you like to see on your car's rear window"
      For starters, I would like to see a car. And so, apparently, only stick to the window ...
      1. +3
        24 November 2014 07: 22
        Quote: Karabanov
        . And so, apparently, only stick to the window ...

        then the third option is quite suitable for you, if you clean the inside of the emblem, you can attach it to the bathroom in the mirror! Yes lol
        1. +2
          24 November 2014 14: 15
          Mirror? As an option! Thank you for the fact that at least the "sawn star" is not offered. (For me, option 5 is optimal). And a car is a real deal ...
          1. +1
            26 November 2014 15: 27
            I respect for the nickname! He also once read Pikul. I do not agree with your opinion.
      2. +1
        26 November 2014 05: 44
        I have the same situation
    8. +3
      24 November 2014 07: 17
      No. 1 and No. 9, although the ninth is more concise ...
    9. +3
      24 November 2014 07: 19
      I offer the most meaningful option
      1. +24
        24 November 2014 07: 24
        that is this? quite, quite ... Yes
        1. +2
          24 November 2014 18: 31
          I do not think so. This is a symbol of Victory, the end of the war. In the meantime, the war continues. If you take something from Vuchetich, then the Motherland from the Mamaev Hill. Motherland is calling! The chopped swastika revived again and creeps into our open spaces.
          1. 0
            26 November 2014 15: 18
            Yes, I look at her every day from the window and think-- until! Not alone, I'm a warrior in the field ..
    10. +3
      24 November 2014 07: 20
      Option 4, the eye is not confused in detail, briefly and expressively
      1. +1
        24 November 2014 08: 45
        I agree with you.
    11. 3vs
      +6
      24 November 2014 07: 25
      In general, without options, the ninth option and only him!
      No need to choose the first - too overloaded with details.
      The ninth option and as a sticker and as a picture on a T-shirt
      the best option!
      1. +2
        24 November 2014 10: 07
        Also for number 9 only! Recognizable, not an alapist as the first, simple to manufacture. you can translate it into a vector yourself and even cut it out from an oracle at any advertising company !!! Or a vector version for downloading to place on the site.
        So I vote for number 9 !!!
        1. +3
          24 November 2014 10: 30
          It’s not necessary to shove everything that is there, the type of troops, etc.! This is the VO logo, not the Air Force, and as a logo it has been working for several years. Changing it for stickers will have to change for the site, as there will be no connection except for the inscription.
          Well, if they don’t choose No. 9, I myself will only make such a horizontal one more! )))))))
    12. +10
      24 November 2014 07: 25
      I liked option number 5. Short and informative.
      The "penny" is credited. Wah, wah. smile
      1. By
        By
        +4
        24 November 2014 07: 40
        The 5th option most closely matches the sticker on the car. The first option that many people like for car stickers is too overloaded and clumsy. Sticker design should be suitable for any car, any color to be. And in order not to turn into a stain, you should have a clear large picture and a minimum of details.
      2. jjj
        +1
        24 November 2014 12: 53
        Quote: Hairy Siberian
        The "penny" is credited.

        This is not a "penny". This is a VAZ-21011
    13. +3
      24 November 2014 07: 43
      No. 9 is normal
    14. +10
      24 November 2014 07: 45
      Of all the options, I liked this one the most. But, unfortunately, he does not participate in the competition ...
      1. +1
        24 November 2014 08: 56
        "Polite people" as a trade mark was bought by "Voentorg" ...
      2. 0
        24 November 2014 10: 08
        I made a layout from this picture. It did not pass. hi
    15. +1
      24 November 2014 07: 47
      I propose a second round of voting. For the first is like more, but voted for 9, for simplicity. Although not necessarily on glass.
    16. +2
      24 November 2014 07: 47
      I vote for No. 9.
      And to number 2 remark. Does it seem to me alone or not, what silhouettes of technology should be rotated 180 degrees? Well, in the end, after a little, reconfigure the drawing itself?
      1. +5
        24 November 2014 09: 59
        Not alone! Definitely worth turning! Although I for the option 5 - meets the conditions of necessity and sufficiency
      2. 0
        24 November 2014 18: 26
        I do not think so. We are writing from left to right. And the arrow of Ahriman is also directed to the right.
    17. 0
      24 November 2014 07: 58
      I am for the first option. I do not know . how it will look, but like it more than the rest.
    18. Outpost
      0
      24 November 2014 08: 04
      All are good except option number 6
    19. +5
      24 November 2014 08: 14
      The first option, but without the St. George ribbon, it does not fit stylistically.
      The fifth option is the most concise, like the lower version of the composition.
      Well, the ninth option, as the most familiar

      And why on the eighth version of the silhouettes of the F-18?
      From our "foreign partners"?
      1. +1
        24 November 2014 09: 11
        Quote: Normal
        And why on the eighth version of the silhouettes of the F-18?
        From our "foreign partners"?


        F-16 soon ...
        1. 0
          24 November 2014 09: 36
          Still, the F-18. The vertical plumage with two keels deflected outward is shifted forward relative to the stabilizer. Yes, and two engines.
    20. 0
      24 November 2014 08: 16
      I liked the first option good .
    21. +10
      24 November 2014 08: 22
      The star should be red. No more. And in general, return the red color to the army star.
    22. +3
      24 November 2014 08: 32
      I liked the 5th option, short and catchy, but not the slogan in this version. Yet. I am a supporter of "safe sex", i.e. safe movement on the road and I will not clutter up half the glass with a picture. Confused by the size.
      Maybe it’s worth leaving for now the well-known option?
      I did not vote.
    23. +4
      24 November 2014 08: 40
      They are plagued by vague doubts that the silhouettes of the aircraft on the №8 are not some of ours ... Bah, so this is F-16 !!!
      1. +4
        24 November 2014 09: 25
        No, there the F-18 clearly guesses - two engines.
        1. +2
          24 November 2014 09: 32
          All one, not ours !! am
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +1
          25 November 2014 07: 22
          Quote: Wedmak
          No, there the F-18 clearly guesses - two engines.

          perhaps yes, and the rear plumage is not the 16th ...
      2. sazhka4
        +1
        24 November 2014 11: 26
        Quote: avia12005
        Bah, so this is F-16 !!!

        F / A 18 .. To be correct. Or not?
        1. +1
          25 November 2014 07: 23
          Quote: sazhka4
          Quote: avia12005
          Bah, so this is F-16 !!!

          F / A 18 .. To be correct. Or not?

          in short: he is not ours! and end to the debate! Yes
    24. +4
      24 November 2014 08: 44
      And I wouldn’t hang a single one. All, not to say that pure r ..., but they are not holding out against the emblem with the soldier from Treptow Park.
    25. +3
      24 November 2014 08: 58
      The emblem is not a newspaper! No need to strive to shove too much different information into it. Also, one should not give preference to someone. Conciseness and generalization, these are the selection criteria. Option 5 is most suitable.
    26. zzz
      zzz
      0
      24 November 2014 08: 59
      Add a ribbon from the first (if possible) to the fifth. The most optimal for a sticker.
    27. +1
      24 November 2014 09: 00
      In the picture 2 horseman horseman?
    28. +1
      24 November 2014 09: 00
      Like 1,4, 5.
      But, the soldier with the baby in her arms is still closer. I agree.
      1. +1
        24 November 2014 10: 07
        Quote: Igarr
        But, the soldier with the baby in her arms is still closer. I agree.

        Comrad, there are "sofa troops" and not the Ministry of Emergencies. wink
        It must be like a bullet: A striker-barrel-target.
        An example from the USSR: October-asterisk with Ulyanov, Pioneers - red tie, Komsomol-Red banner with Ilyich. etc.
        And monuments are already, at least a story, and it is he and not a story or a true story. hi
        1. +1
          24 November 2014 12: 34
          Comrad, there are "sofa troops" and not the Ministry of Emergencies.
          It must be like a bullet: A striker-barrel-target.
          And why should? Vaccination of clip thinking?
          A monument is, first of all, history, the competition is still of the emblems of the Military Review of Russia, and not some Rwanda with Burundi. "It should be like a bullet" is unlikely to pass here.
          1. 0
            24 November 2014 17: 40
            Quote: Blondy
            Vaccination of clip thinking?

            Brevity is the sister of talent, and not of the chopped off one who can not do anything, in the case of SMS thinking.
            Quote: Blondy
            The competition is still the emblems of the Military Review of Russia, and not some Rwanda with Burundi

            In 100 out of 100, when polling ordinary people, you associate AK with Russia and not with Rwanda Brunei. Likewise, the "Red Five-Pointed Star" and "Hammer and Sickle" are the USSR!
            Quote: Blondy
            "It should be like a bullet" is unlikely to pass here.

            That is exactly how it should be and not otherwise.
            First of all, "VO" is a commercial project at the present time, and only after all the other queues - patriotism, technology, equipment, history, etc.
            And most importantly: The emblem should read normally and look read on the rear or windshield of a car!
            About options: No. 8 is just trolling, as well as No. 6 and No. 2.
            No. 7 is either a horseshoe, a crescent moon full of holes, or a pipeline flange.
            No. 3 in general, as a concept ( good ), but very raw.
            No. 4 is the cover of the charter or code of rules, but not like a logo.
            No. 9 then what was the point of starting a contest?
            I will take one example:
            Concern "Kalina" was just a factory "Ural Gems" -What kind of association with perfumery and cosmetics? NO!!!!
            Check out the story of Adi Dassler's brainchild. This is the standard logo and association for all layers of people.
    29. +2
      24 November 2014 09: 01
      My layouts aren't there? Annoyingly crying
    30. 0
      24 November 2014 09: 03
      Voted preliminary for option 9, I think that there are few options for choice and the star should be familiar red
    31. +1
      24 November 2014 09: 25
      Why reinvent the wheel? The image recognizable by all of us is already on the site page. So - option 1 or 9.
      The authors of other options - my sincere respect and desire not to be upset.
      Hello to all forum users! hi
    32. +3
      24 November 2014 09: 27
      Replace the silhouette of the F-8 with the Su-18 on the 34 version and it will also be a great option. By the way, it can be left for the future, with the release of a new tank, the T-72 can be replaced with Armata.
      1. 0
        24 November 2014 13: 22
        Quote: Wedmak
        Replace the silhouette of the F-8 on the Su-18 on the 34th version
        Under this condition, I would also vote for the 8th option, and so abstained.
      2. +1
        25 November 2014 07: 26
        Quote: Wedmak
        Replace the silhouette of the F-8 on the Su-18 on the 34th option and it will also be a great option. By the way, it can be left for the future, with the release of a new tank, the T-72 replace with Armata.

        Denis! where to draw it "ARMAT" then? it will be shot for "divulging"! lol
    33. +9
      24 November 2014 09: 34
      On the sixth - some kind of soldier ... not like that.
      Sugary, in a word.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +1
          24 November 2014 14: 11
          Quote: woron333444
          AND LIKE A CHINESE IN CHINA

          Exactly!
      2. The comment was deleted.
    34. +3
      24 November 2014 09: 35
      Option number five is not bad, and voted for it. And we recognize, of course, the ninth.
      1. 3vs
        +2
        24 November 2014 09: 50
        So we are talking about recognition!
        And the ninth option is the most, it is clear that the designer worked!
        And in general, I would have made it a brand of this site and posted on
        main page.
        Only the color you need to make the color from the site and everything will be oceans! fellow
    35. +2
      24 November 2014 09: 55
      9 option, the star is red and the background is transparent)))
    36. +3
      24 November 2014 09: 55
      I give my vote to the 5th option. The most simple, understandable and readable. The 9th option is also not bad, if the contours of the drawing are made a little thinner, more precisely.
      1st is good, but alas, like a poster, but not like a car sticker.
    37. +2
      24 November 2014 10: 00
      Cool!!! good But you will not please comrades !!! I propose to deploy # 9 for the adherents of one kind of army or another instead of the T-50 to place howitzers, OZK, ships, tanks, machine guns, etc. By request soldier .... So we will respect the kind of troops and about the native Military Review we will remember! hi and it’s not so important which model will win, the main thing is that soon the fisherman sees the fisherman from far away !!! The very fact of the meeting will be so pleasant! drinks In the cold winter, it will warm the soul .... Maybe the brothers from Ukraine will become warmer crying In any case, thank you all for the contest, he rallied us great !!!
      1. 0
        24 November 2014 18: 23
        And also a bulldozer and a circular saw !!! wink
        1. +1
          25 November 2014 07: 31
          Quote: Mentor
          And also a bulldozer and a circular saw !!! wink

          brother-in-law in Chemistry served ... then why? the formula of "phosgene" with "mustard gas" against the background of a gas mask? belay
      2. +2
        25 November 2014 07: 29
        Quote: Akos28
        so soon the fisherman saw the fisherman from far away !!!

        what about fishing? from now on, please read more! smile
    38. +4
      24 November 2014 10: 04
      In my opinion, the 5 version is ideal, concise, recognizable, not overloaded with details.
      and the 9 variant is traditional in relation to the style of the site.
    39. 0
      24 November 2014 10: 06
      I would choose No. 8, if the planes were replaced by ours, and so No. 9.
    40. +1
      24 November 2014 10: 11
      When choosing an option, I agree with the opinion expressed, it is necessary to take into account the size of the sticker. Still, I would not want to clutter up the glass, especially the rear. I occasionally look there. smile
    41. I am proud of Russia
      +1
      24 November 2014 10: 33
      I really liked 1,2 and 8. I set my choice for them, but more than 8 of them.
      1. +5
        25 November 2014 07: 41
        Quote: Proud of Russia
        I really liked 1,2 and 8. I set my choice for them, but more than 8 of them.

        girls, yes it will suit you too! you are the best with us! Yes
    42. lankrus
      +1
      24 November 2014 10: 48
      Trite and most are simply overloaded with details. Unfortunately I could not stop at anything.
    43. +8
      24 November 2014 10: 53
      Voted for the 5th option, although there are several equally worthy ...
      But still I think that the QR code should be on the sticker, it is simply obliged to be present during smartphones ...
      1. 0
        24 November 2014 23: 29
        what for? enough inscription.
    44. +3
      24 November 2014 10: 54
      5 or 9: short, concise, without a huge amount of detail and quite recognizable.
    45. +2
      24 November 2014 11: 00
      Yes, they are all cool ... but the 5 7 and 9 options are more or less solid
    46. 52
      0
      24 November 2014 11: 12
      Probably still the 9th option. The 8th is not bad, but the eroplanes are clearly not "in an arc".
    47. +2
      24 November 2014 11: 13
      option 5 and 9
    48. sazhka4
      0
      24 November 2014 11: 18
      Only the First. And in the second one, as it were, it is necessary to "Russianize" this knight on horseback a little. Some kind of Mongolian?)))
    49. 0
      24 November 2014 11: 20
      1st option - the most capacious image, and the most beautiful. The 2nd one is not bad by design, but the elements are too spread on the table (although there is no way to insert a knight there), well, the red star and the knight somehow dissonant. Of course, I respect the traditions of the Red Army, but the military history of Russia did not begin with the Red Star. In the 1st embodiment, the symbolism of the Geornievsky ribbon is universal. The rest are also good (except for the profile in the helmet, - the helmet says little about the carrier). I think that the requirements for a sticker on glass are secondary, you can reduce the size of the sticker and calm down about visibility through the rear window. Definitely for the 1st option.
    50. +1
      24 November 2014 11: 23
      Emblem 1 is the most !!! And the St. George ribbon, in terms of military equipment, everything is compact plus the globe ...
      1. +1
        24 November 2014 13: 02
        I, too, for the first!
    51. yulka2980
      0
      24 November 2014 11: 40
      I like options 1 and 8 good !By the way, in our city now there are stickers with Obama’s face crossed out, etc.
    52. +3
      24 November 2014 11: 46
      option 5 is similar to the Avtoradio logo, they will get confused, 1 is good, but as for a poster, it means 9. +.
      I have a pickup truck, in general the sticker on the glass is a problem, it won’t be visible, so we ask the designers to take care for such “outcasts” as us to make a picture on the door or hood.
    53. +3
      24 November 2014 12: 18
      Where can I vote against the new logo of TC "Zvezda"?
    54. +2
      24 November 2014 12: 35
      Options 8 and 9 are more recognizable and familiar, but the absence of St. George ribbons symbolizing the Russian World weighed in favor of the first option.
      But I don’t have a car, I’ll be glad to hang such a sticker at home)))
    55. +1
      24 November 2014 12: 43
      I don't like the planes on the options 1, 7, 9, these planes are somehow not Russian, although I could be wrong.

      I immediately wanted to vote for this option 8, but immediately in the comments they identified the silhouettes of airplanes on it as not our silhouettes of airplanes...

      Stars... Well, I don’t know why they should start a competition if they again choose a star everyone knows. They would immediately change the logo to a trustworthy star and not a single user would even say a bad word.

      Option 2 not bad, but the horseman should have been made in silhouette (my opinion) or not made at all. I think 2The swarm option requires improvement.

      I can’t vote for any option, since none of the presented logo options answer exactly My ideas about my beloved and respected Military Review.

      Sincerely.
    56. Alex183381
      +1
      24 November 2014 12: 54
      A shame. No. 8 is clearly an F-18....

      And the profile of the PAK FA is not obvious... something between the F-22 and the Chinese dragon))))
    57. +1
      24 November 2014 13: 01
      By and large, all branches of the military are united by the Red Star. We will leave the newfangled children's coloring game to the conscience of the Ministry of Defense.
    58. +3
      24 November 2014 13: 17
      I don’t like the first one, it’s too clumsy, there’s a lot of stuff. and with the symbol (ribbon) you need to be more careful, especially since VO is not a purely army portal, and the people here are different, not only from the USSR

      Yes, and about the QR code - that’s right, I support it
    59. erg
      +4
      24 November 2014 13: 25
      I prefer options 8 and 5. Laconic, clear, to the point. They are easy to read, like emblems. Option 1 is too overloaded with figures, which, moreover, are “closely” arranged. The emblem is poorly perceived. The St. George ribbon looks like an extra element, since it is given in color, unlike other figures. Option 2 - the rider neither goes to the village nor to the city. The equipment and the star are given in the form of silhouettes, and the warrior in a natural form. Perhaps if the figure of the warrior is moved to the other side and given as a silhouette, it will be better. Yes, and it’s probably better with a spear. Option 3 is good, but it seems like something unfinished. Something is missing. Option 4 - I don’t think it will look good on the glass of a car, rather on the cover of a magazine or book. Option 6 - the warrior’s head looks like a Vietnamese or Chinese. Need to draw it more clearly. Maybe it’s worth adding silhouettes of the heads of an ancient Russian warrior and a warrior from the war of 1812, positioning them as Marx, Engels, and Lenin were depicted in their time. Option 7 - in my opinion, there is simply no way. Option 9 is good, but more suitable for an aviation site. Or add images of other equipment, a tank or a ship. Or make several identical emblems with different weapons - one with a tank, one with an airplane, with a ship, etc., so to speak, to choose from, whoever wants which one.
    60. 0
      24 November 2014 14: 06
      It seems to me that if you remove the clutter of equipment from No. 1 and leave only the ball, it will be just right. It is possible to add a soldier from Treptower Park with a base in the fourth quadrant the size of a third of the globe and move the “military” down or clockwise.
    61. +1
      24 November 2014 14: 58
      I am for option 1, but I like the warrior with a child on his arm and a lowered sword, with a St. George ribbon: it seems to me that he connects the heroic past and the “polite” present.
    62. 0
      24 November 2014 15: 02
      The first one is good conceptually, but a little clumsy. Too many details. And in a two-color version, it is not feasible, which is not good for a screen-printed emblem.

      I voted for the last, ninth option.
    63. 0
      24 November 2014 15: 03
      To be honest, everyone at the circle level has skillful hands, just like the logo of our modern army. An old red star would look most logical.
    64. 0
      24 November 2014 15: 33
      In my opinion, the eighth option is the best. True, it would be necessary to add a color version. The first option is, of course, good, but too overloaded and heavy. The ninth option would be suitable not for military viewing, but for aviation.
    65. 0
      24 November 2014 15: 33
      As noted above, if you unload the middle on the first one, it will be fine, but 8-9.
    66. 0
      24 November 2014 16: 01
      I like option number 9. Everyone knows the plane and it’s like a calling card of VO. Others are also not bad, but less recognizable.
    67. +1
      24 November 2014 16: 25
      Quote: Mentor
      Option 5, concise and conspicuous. For indentation in motion - that’s it.

      Agree! And the motto is good!
    68. 0
      24 November 2014 16: 35
      I voted for option 9, the rest without comment.
    69. +1
      24 November 2014 16: 53
      For one moment no one paid attention. The sticker should not block your view. Option No. 1 is good, but “dumb”, i.e. without gaps, the pattern will cover a decent part of the rear window. It would be nice to take this into account when developing the following options. hi
    70. +1
      24 November 2014 17: 10
      8 badge is cool....
      only hornet is not the topic there (((
    71. 0
      24 November 2014 17: 16
      From the first option, remove the ship with missiles and a tank from the center, place the usual site header logo there - "MILITARY T-50 REVIEW". The question arises from the discrepancy between the colors of the emblem and the St. George's ribbon.
      I would suggest, like many here, to continue working, although they vote for 9. But I would only stick on the transparent one.
    72. +1
      24 November 2014 17: 17
      option 4 THE MOST SERIOUS!
      THE REST OF Wrappers FOR LOVERS OF TASTY CANDY...!
      STAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ON THE BACKGROUND OF THE WHITE SKY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      A star, it has all the power, it can be on a Lada, on a helmet, a tank, an airplane, FOR A PATRIOT ANYWHERE!
      SHE IS A STAR, and everything next to her is US!
    73. +1
      24 November 2014 17: 42
      A lot of show-off 3 seems polite and angry
    74. +3
      24 November 2014 17: 56
      I like options 4 and 9 bully
      But I don't have a car crying
      1. +1
        26 November 2014 15: 04
        Buy it! There are so many things to show up at once.
    75. +1
      24 November 2014 18: 21
      Quote: very smart
      Quote: Mentor
      concise and noticeable.

      Dear colleague, all pictures are visible. Some are not very concise. But in the first message about the start of the contest, I asked the moderators a question about the size of the sticker. Is it possible that even a laconic but large sticker will simply interfere with the driver? And for the same reasons, it should be as transparent as possible. Again, merchants with striped sticks will dig to the big sticker, as before a pillar! There is nothing to feed them, let them lose weight! And the rest - all the pictures are decent. In my opinion, a little worse than 6 and 7. But there is plenty to choose from, and there is no need to rush to the winner. The idea should mature a little and mature.

      It seems to me that I have already answered that if the administration has a file in CDR format at its disposal, then there will be no problems with scaling to the required size? From a few millimeters to meter-long banners.
    76. 0
      24 November 2014 18: 54
      Are there other options?!
    77. +2
      24 November 2014 19: 04
      I really liked the slogan of option 5. I offer it as a Motto, or maybe hold a similar competition on the Speech, Slogan, Motto of our site? What do you think, Fighters?
    78. 0
      24 November 2014 19: 34
      For some reason I’m alone....I know from experience that it means I’m wrong...
      But I liked option 4. Briefly, clearly, without trifles or preferences.
    79. 0
      24 November 2014 19: 41
      ....and also...as someone who is cut off from civilization, I’m afraid to remain deprived... recourse How would the fathers-moderators, after acceptance for consumption, also explain...where to get it!!???
    80. 0
      24 November 2014 20: 04
      Option 9 is modern, concise and recognizable. The first one is also class.
    81. +1
      24 November 2014 20: 09
      Option 5 because there is a slogan there, it will explain to “non-siters” what all this is for.
    82. +2
      24 November 2014 20: 21
      Option No. 5 is the most concise and well-composed. Just what you need for a logo, stickers.
    83. +1
      24 November 2014 20: 34
      No. 9. Simple, concise, recognizable, professionally executed.
    84. 0
      24 November 2014 21: 21
      I graduated from BVVAUL, I respect all types and branches of the military, especially all kinds of special forces and the like... but my vote is for number 1!!! where can I buy and order? I think that in my airline I will be the first with the VO sign!!!
    85. -2
      24 November 2014 21: 41
      The emblems are all good, especially the first one, it’s a pity that our Russian eagle is not on any of the emblems, it would fit in very well on the third one, and the ribbon of St. George is a must, with it my great-grandfather beat the Reds and now our brothers in Novorossiya are Red- brown Nazis are being beaten...
      1. +3
        25 November 2014 07: 45
        Quote: Sanya Rus
        My great-grandfather beat the Reds with her

        Well, you are a m.r.a.z....however, from a bad seed there is no tribe... fool
    86. +1
      24 November 2014 22: 23
      I approached it on a fisherman-to-fisherman basis. Therefore, No. 9.
    87. +1
      24 November 2014 22: 54
      Quote: Banshee
      From the point of view of convenience of recognition is definitely the ninth option.
      It can be done with or without a transparent background.
      The first is good, yes, but it is clearly overloaded. It will look like a dirty spot.

      Objectively speaking, everyone is good in their own way! However, we are talking about a sticker on the rear window of the car, which means it should at least be striking and readable. Number 9, in my opinion, is a little small, even in the details of the image (unless, of course, the samples are presented in real scale, or close to it. I prefer option 4 - strictly, minimalist (and at the same time bright), and convincing. PS Hello Roman, and best wishes! bully
    88. 0
      24 November 2014 23: 27
      1 is oversaturated with details
      2 poor Khazars and “truth” - NO font
      3 too smart - unintuitive. somehow simple
      4 everything is fine but only color and no graphic anchor
      and in general deja vu from the Soviet Union
      +5 laconic, but the slogan is out of topic. has the right to life
      the second option is even better.
      6 it feels like the picture was ripped off from Soviet propaganda and for some reason there is a strong association
      with a Chinese man at a construction site.
      7 is a little crumpled.
      +8 The inverted text is a little confusing. and yes - the dynamics of the text encourages you to go to the right! IMHO. and yes the plane seems to be an F-16?
      +9 why is the star legless?
    89. +1
      24 November 2014 23: 37
      The first one is the most recognizable, and for the ninth one add a ray from the star, it will be the best!!!! Hi all!
    90. +2
      25 November 2014 00: 17
      The elephant painter painted the landscape,
      But before sending him to the opening day,
      He invited his friends to look at the painting:
      What if, suddenly, it failed?
      Our artist is flattered by the attention of the guests!
      What kind of criticism will he hear now?
      Will not be cruel animal court?
      Overthrown? Or will they exalt?
      Connoisseurs have come. The elephant opened the picture.
      Who stood next? Who came closer?
      “Well, well,” began the crocodile, “
      The landscape is good! But I don’t see Neil!”
      “It’s no big deal that Neil is gone!”
      Said the Seal. “But where is the snow?” Where is the ice?"
      “Excuse me!” the Mole was surprised.
      There is something more important than ice!
      The artist forgot his garden!"
      “Oink-Oink,” the Pig grunted.
      "The picture was a success, friends!
      But from the point of view of us pigs,
      There must be acorns on it!"

      All wishes were accepted by the Elephant.
      He took up the paints again.
      And to all my friends, to the best of my ability,
      I hit with the power of an elephant.
      Depicting snow and ice and the Nile,
      And the oak and the vegetable garden. And even honey!
      (In case, suddenly, Bear,
      will come to see the picture...)
      The Elephant's painting is ready.
      Friends called the artist again.
      The guests looked at the landscape,
      And they whispered: "Yeralash!"

      My friend, don't be such an Elephant:
      Follow the advice. But wisely.
      You can't please all your friends
      You'll only harm yourself!

      Sergey Mikhalkov.
    91. +4
      25 November 2014 00: 46
      ... the authors tried, I respect .. but I don’t vote for any option ..
    92. +2
      25 November 2014 08: 00
      9 is more reminiscent of an inverted pentogram...., with the consequences that follow from this...!
    93. Igor 069
      0
      25 November 2014 10: 05
      Option 5 is simple and without unnecessary diversity
    94. sazhka4
      0
      25 November 2014 10: 55
      All this is nonsense.. In Donbass they now know “VO” precisely by the logo it has.. After all, they may not understand)))
    95. 0
      25 November 2014 11: 38
      5th option, concise and clear, which is what the symbol needs. The first one is too colorful and overloaded with small details.
    96. 0
      25 November 2014 11: 56
      I suggest that the organizers of the competition repeat the voting between the three who received the most votes.
    97. 0
      25 November 2014 12: 03
      I'm for option 3! Seriously, there will be almost no obstruction of the view.
    98. 0
      25 November 2014 15: 35
      not overloaded, clear, clear - 5
    99. +1
      25 November 2014 18: 34
      Working wiper and working heating. This is enough for the rear window. Organize the rest of your fantasies under the blanket...
    100. Gagarin
      0
      25 November 2014 18: 53
      I liked the 1st one better, but as a driver I understand that the glass will get in the way, there are too many areas and details, I voted for the 9th one and was pleasantly surprised by the collective result.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"