Military Review

Mikhail Samarsky: Let's say “thank you” to Gorbachev

206
Mikhail Samarsky: Let's say “thank you” to GorbachevNot for nothing did they say in Russia since ancient times that everyone judges from his own bell tower. So Gorbachev's bell tower was too high, so high that he saw from there something that we didn’t even guess. Saw and stunned.

I had the honor of personally seeing and listening to Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev. He came to one of the Moscow stores to present his new book.

No matter how we treat this man, no matter what journalists or writers write about him, it is senseless and irresponsible to deny the fact that Mikhail Gorbachev entered the world history as one of the most influential political figures of the 20th century, as a man who made one-sixth of the earth free.

I foresee a flurry of questions from outraged readers and rhetorically questioning: free from whom and why? I answer briefly: from many years of hypocrisy!

Probably, every active user has met on the Web the following attacks against the Nobel Peace Prize winner, the first and last President of the USSR:

“... I don’t care that the criminal who destroyed the country, condemned millions of people to death, to torment, suffering, humiliation, has not yet been punished for his deeds. He must bear criminal responsibility. He destroyed the lives of millions of people, and the best years of the lives of those people went in search of a piece of bread, to survive ... ”

It is obvious that people who either do not know the history of our country or who do not want to be free can write such things. The thought involuntarily comes: when and in what country did people not get food and did not strive for survival?

As if up to Gorbachev, the Soviet people lay carelessly on the sofa and calmly sipped vodka. Or have we erased the civil war, famine and terror of the thirties, post-war ethnic and political cleansings, Nikita Sergeevich's corn jumps, Leonid Ilyich's self-graded rain, Andropov’s cinema checkpoints from the history of our country? Does it all matter? Forgot? Have passed

Immediately make a reservation: the claims that I did not live in those times and have no right to express my opinion, I strongly reject. The counter question is: who lived under Lenin, under Catherine the Great, under Peter the Great, under Ivan the Terrible? What should we now sit and be silent - they say, did not live, sit and be silent?

I will say this: today we have phenomenal opportunities to study and restructure, and its consequences. I need to know this even by the nature of my activity, since I study at the Faculty of Political Science.

You can not judge a person who held the highest position in the state, superficially. To understand him, however, like the current president, you need, if not to sit in his chair, then at least stand side by side.

Not for nothing did they say in Russia since ancient times that everyone judges from his own bell tower. So Mikhail Gorbachev’s bell tower was too high, so high that he saw from there something that we didn’t even guess. Saw and stunned.

What kind of a criminal is this, if the head of state declared publicly: “People, let's speak the truth! We do not have enough publicity! We are lurking! "? Is this a crime? The offender thinks differently: that, on the contrary, it’s easier to fish in troubled waters.

And here the person calls for transparency, truth and honesty. Eyewitnesses say that just under Mikhail Sergeyevich there was even more publicity than now. Perhaps it seems so now, but nevertheless many people, who were silent before perestroika, began to speak openly and call things by their proper names. But, you see, it costs a lot.

It's one thing when you condemn state policy in a whisper in the kitchen, and quite another when you can rise to the podium and criticize the authorities openly, without fear that they will come for you at night.

I read on the Internet reasoning on this topic and wonder how someone wants to return to old times. And tell me: for whom? For us, or what? But I assure you, young people do not need either the CPSU, or the Soviet government, or the ancient Egyptian building in Red Square.

Why do we need it? Do you want us to wear Oktyabryat stars from childhood, and then, having grown up a bit, marching in red ties? Do you want us, like you at one time, by hook or by crook, to join the Communist Party for promotion? Do you want us to read the newspaper "Pravda" and one and all voted "for"?

And if we talk about corruption today, then you definitely need to look back, further and further. Today’s evil, which is eating away at our society, has old and deep roots. Everything that we see today was born long before Gorbachev.

And it was this man and the head of state who wanted to root out these roots, but he did not manage. It's a shame, of course! And plus to everything, nobody argues, there were mistakes. But, as you know, the one who does nothing is not mistaken. What now scold him?

He was a man of his era. He rose from the assistant to the combine to the president of a huge country. But it was not his fault that by the mid-eighties of the last century that country was rotten through and through. Gorbachev accomplished the feat. In fact, he is a Hero of both the Soviet Union and the Hero of Russia.

This man opened the window in our house and let in fresh air. But the trouble is - some people are accustomed to breathing the stench and do not want to breathe in fresh air. But this is not Gorbachev’s fault.

But a sober-minded user writes in RuNet: “One person (even very clever) can never destroy a real country. By the year 1991, the USSR practically did not exist, it was destroyed by the half-crazed Kremlin elders, steeped in a stupid arms race, and low oil prices (provoked by the United States and Saudi Arabia). It was necessary to think a head in "fat 70-e."

Today it is easy for us to argue according to the principle “if it were yes,” and Gorbachev was on the unbeaten road, leaving the country where they were imprisoned for business, into the open sea. In fact, he did not even imagine that he would come out of his publicity and perestroika. Let's at least now not fool ourselves. We were lucky. A completely different person could have come to power ...

So let's say thanks to Gorbachev, who did not demolish the temples and burn the icons, who did not strengthen the iron curtain and introduce new draconian laws, who did not rush to build a new GULAG, which suggested that we all just tell the truth and live not by lies.

Unfortunately, our truth was so heavy that even the Soviet foundation could not stand it, and in the end the whole building collapsed.

Born 15 August 1996. A student at Moscow State University (faculty of political science), chairman of the Moscow regional branch of the Youth Russian Society of Political Scientists, founder of the Living Hearts Foundation for the Blind People. For two years, he ran a blog on the Echo of Moscow radio website, ceased cooperation due to censorship. Since 2009, he has been writing books. Currently eight feature books have been published. He is a regular contributor to the Eksmo publishing house, where a special nominal series “Mikhail Samarsky. The best books for teens. The handbook of Michael is - "Experiments" by Michel Montaigne.
Author:
Originator:
http://vz.ru/columns/2014/11/21/716442.html
206 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. GRF
    GRF 22 November 2014 09: 07
    +56
    Who thanks the surgeon for the disgusting work done?
    1. FACKtoREAL
      FACKtoREAL 22 November 2014 09: 17
      +21
      Who thanks the surgeon for the disgusting work done?

      Gorbachev, even with Herrug can not be compared! negative
      Rather, he was a POOR political shaman with an old holey tambourine ... laughing
      1. Момент
        Момент 22 November 2014 09: 19
        +44
        He sold such a state for the Nobel Prize, and most importantly, the people gave up to America and Europe. The first traitor to the destruction of Russia.
        Judging by the article, the author makes a name for himself.
        1. Alexkorzun
          Alexkorzun 22 November 2014 09: 31
          +77
          the guy posted an article on the wrong resource ... he needs to print on Echo matzah.
          1. PPL
            PPL 22 November 2014 09: 37
            +20
            Quote: Alexkorzun
            the guy posted an article on the wrong resource ... he needs to print on Echo matzah.

            And there didn’t take root ... lol
            From the article:
            For two years he had a blog on the site of the radio "Echo of Moscow", stopped cooperation due to censorship.
            1. demon1978
              demon1978 22 November 2014 09: 55
              +26
              Author Mikhail Samarsky

              Not the grand-nephew of Novodvorskaya ??? !!! what request
              The style of delirium is very similar yes Nature does not tolerate empty ???request
              1. Schoolboy
                Schoolboy 22 November 2014 10: 07
                +3
                There will be more similarities with age.
                1. Canep
                  Canep 22 November 2014 10: 48
                  +14
                  Quote: Schoolboy
                  There will be more similarities with age.

                  With age, the worldview may change, I do not think that his article can be taken seriously, an 18-year-old boy talks about events that he did not see, witnesses of these events. And even trying from a scientific historical point of view of them (i.e. us) to change our attitude towards Gorbachev.
                  1. ddd1975
                    ddd1975 25 November 2014 08: 42
                    +1
                    ... here with such boys and articles begins the betrayal of their homeland. Many in this - 18 year old - age give their lives for their MOTHERLAND! But such jerks - I didn’t read it, didn’t think of it, didn’t finish it ... - better than him and dad didn’t love his mother, but put off this mucus into the toilet ...
                2. demon1978
                  demon1978 22 November 2014 11: 07
                  +3
                  Quote: Schoolboy
                  There will be more similarities with age.

                  SAVE AND SAVE THE LORD !!!!! belay belay
            2. saag
              saag 22 November 2014 10: 13
              +3
              Quote: PPZ
              And there didn’t take root ...

              In general, in my opinion, "Echo of Moscow" looks like the collegium of Pavel Galagan in Odessa before the revolution, they accepted for money all sorts of ignoramuses who were kicked out from everywhere :-) and if he could not resist there either ...
            3. avg
              avg 22 November 2014 11: 26
              +17
              Born August 15, 1996. She has been writing books since 2009. ... a special inscribed series “Mikhail Samarsky. The best books for teens. "

              Why do we need this article? We saw it, and the boy was told about it on "Echo of Moscow". They would have told elsewhere, you see, he would have written other articles. So far, there is nothing in it except complacency and youth nihilism.
          2. Schoolboy
            Schoolboy 22 November 2014 10: 04
            +7
            I agree. Students need to score points elsewhere.
          3. Egoza
            Egoza 22 November 2014 11: 05
            +32
            Quote: Alexkorzun
            he needs to be printed on echo matzah.

            He was already there, but left due to censorship ...

            Carefully read the last paragraph of the article !!!!
            He is a regular contributor to Eksmo Publishing House, where a special name series, Mikhail Samarsky. Best books for teens »


            Can you imagine WHAT he writes for teenagers? A whole inscribed series! That's where the fifth column begins to operate! People! Be carefull! Explain to your children that it is an ENEMY !!!
            1. RUSS
              RUSS 22 November 2014 11: 53
              -19
              Quote: Egoza
              Can you imagine WHAT he writes for teenagers? A whole inscribed series! That's where the fifth column begins to operate! People! Be carefull! Explain to your children that it is an ENEMY !!!

              Let's first read at least something from his series, and then call him an enemy, otherwise it turns out who doesn’t dream against us?
              1. larand
                larand 23 November 2014 12: 09
                +5
                Quote: RUSS

                Let's first read at least something from his series, and then call him an enemy, otherwise it turns out who doesn’t dream against us?

                This kid himself scribbled that "did not live in those days", which he is trying to judge. So it's not worth talking about this opus. All they say were grief-stricken, flies stuck ... Another nonsense a la Svanidze.
                1. Morfius
                  Morfius 24 November 2014 13: 30
                  0
                  Quote: larand
                  This kid himself scribbled that "did not live in those days", which he is trying to judge. So it's not worth talking about this opus. All they say were grief-stricken, flies stuck ... Another nonsense a la Svanidze.

                  Absolutely right! Some kind of small poop was heating up something, but everyone was discussing.
                  I read and forgot.
              2. Ivan_Koloff
                Ivan_Koloff 24 November 2014 14: 54
                +1
                I lived in the time of Brezhnev, so there is nothing to compare with, today there is complete lawlessness compared to those times if
          4. RUSS
            RUSS 22 November 2014 11: 51
            -13
            Quote: Alexkorzun
            the guy posted an article on the wrong resource ... he needs to print on Echo matzah.


            Well, it’s not for you and me to decide on which resource to upload the article to him, but judging by the number of comments, many people read the article and not just read it, but left their comments.
          5. SHILO
            22 November 2014 15: 12
            +2
            Quote: Alexkorzun
            the guy posted an article on the wrong resource ... he needs to print on Echo matzah.


            Yes, the guy did not post ... wink Then I posted, and to make the joke more fun, I posted a photo and a biography of the author laughing The calculation turned out to be correct winked - both article and author are charred! fellow
          6. jktu66
            jktu66 22 November 2014 15: 42
            +4
            The head of state said publicly: “People, let's speak the truth!” We lack publicity! We are lying! "?
            Perhaps the author should pay attention not to beautiful words, but to MATTERS of political figures. For example! This lying tsuko hid Chernobyl from the people for a week, so that the demonstration in Kiev would calmly take place in a radioactive cloud. It’s scary when at the top of power. The guy should compare the post-Soviet development of Russia and the same period in China.
        2. Shveps
          Shveps 22 November 2014 09: 36
          +34
          "..... Mikhail Gorbachev entered world history as a man who made one sixth of the Earth free."

          It is necessary to think of this. Apparently an unlimited amount of beer drink and the opportunity, having the loot to satisfy any of his lust, puts great pressure on the brain.
          A worthy heir and student of Gorbachev.
          1. Schoolboy
            Schoolboy 22 November 2014 10: 18
            +4
            The young man, in my opinion, poorly studied textbooks on the history of our country.
            1. ksv1973
              ksv1973 22 November 2014 10: 52
              +13
              Quote: Schoolboy
              The young man, in my opinion, poorly studied textbooks on the history of our country.

              And in my opinion, this jerk, the author of the article, is time to try on the army uniform. Then maybe the brains will snap into place a bit.
            2. assam4
              assam4 22 November 2014 19: 14
              +1
              So modern textbooks just teach this.
        3. Burbon1973
          Burbon1973 22 November 2014 16: 13
          +2
          I completely agree with many who have noticed that the author has made a name and discusses the grief of millions and the collapse of a great power by provoking his assessments!
          He even shivers from quotes: “The Great Bell Tower of Gorbachev”, “made one sixth of the Earth free”, “People, let's tell the truth!” We lack publicity! We are lying! ” ....
          © Michael, the impression is that you are raving ....
          Juvenile author, how can you write an article about something you have no idea without having studied the issue comprehensively? This is not professional, especially for a future political scientist! There are many materials that a competent author would study before forming an objective and close to the truth opinion! Although I think the purpose of your article was to throw a fan on to get an active discussion and, as a result, though negative, but attention and popularity! Negative popularity on such a mountain is a shame !!!!
          Here is the correct quote: © - And where is your homeland, son? Gorbachev surrendered your homeland to the Americans to hang out beautifully. And now your homeland has two wars and Crimea has failed. I handed over Russian people in the Baltic, I handed over the Serbs in the Balkans.
        4. fif21
          fif21 24 November 2014 20: 44
          +2
          Quote: Moment
          He sold such a state for the Nobel Prize, and most importantly, the people gave up to America and Europe. The first traitor to the destruction of Russia
          But now we don't have LICIMERY ?! Eh boy, boy! Her Majesty history will judge everyone and give a more or less objective assessment. You are trying to shield a person who betrayed his homeland (the West considers Russia to be a country that lost the Cold War) And the people remember a hunchback as a fighter against alcoholism, as a friend of Western presidents, as a person who has forgotten that his country has its own interests, a person who destroyed his party, army and navy to please the demands of the United States (Reykavik) of a man who destroyed the economy and fled to Foros when it smelled fried. His mediocre foreign and domestic policy plunged the country and the economy into such a state that after 30 years Russia has not reached even half of what the USSR had. And the number of the population that died in Russia during the years of "perestroika" and the dashing 90s cannot be compared with Stalin's repressions nor with civil war and devastation. Losses are comparable only to the 2nd World War. He had a chance to turn the country around and follow the path that China is now following, but he lacked something, apparently his mind. hi
        5. The comment was deleted.
      2. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 22 November 2014 09: 26
        +4
        Gorbachev our story is it good or bad ... Spit on him already tired ..! I think everything that’s not being done for the better .. Russia is reaching a new level of development, difficult and difficult, as always in our history .. Let's break through as always! The main thing is that our soul core should not be picked out from us (and attempts are constantly) And the rest will follow ..That's it hi
        1. valokordin
          valokordin 22 November 2014 10: 31
          +4
          Quote: MIKHAN
          .Will break through as always! The main thing is that our soul core is not picked out of us (and attempts are constantly) And the rest will follow .. Here are the things

          Glad for your indefatigable desire to get out of this dirt, for this you plus. The story has no subjunctive mood and the minuses were put to you in vain, they did not read your note.
          1. Vitaly Anisimov
            Vitaly Anisimov 22 November 2014 11: 11
            +1
            Quote: valokordin
            Quote: MIKHAN
            .Will break through as always! The main thing is that our soul core is not picked out of us (and attempts are constantly) And the rest will follow .. Here are the things

            Glad for your indefatigable desire to get out of this dirt, for this you plus. The story has no subjunctive mood and the minuses were put to you in vain, they did not read your note.

            Thank you for understanding me correctly .. hi
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Peter Timofeev
        Peter Timofeev 22 November 2014 09: 54
        +19
        As if up to Gorbachev, the Soviet people lay carelessly on the sofa and calmly sipped vodka. Or have we erased the civil war, famine and terror of the thirties, post-war ethnic and political cleansings, Nikita Sergeevich's corn jumps, Leonid Ilyich's self-graded rain, Andropov’s cinema checkpoints from the history of our country? Does it all matter? Forgot? Have passed

        No, they didn’t forget, but they didn’t ruin their country, and Gorbachev betrayed it and ruined it, and he himself went to live abroad - Judah.
        1. Ivan_Koloff
          Ivan_Koloff 24 November 2014 15: 06
          0
          during the time of Brezhnev, the ussr was the most powerful state, so that Brezhnev had well-deserved awards, another question is why the hunchback medveputes were awarded the Order of St. Andrew the First-Called?
      5. sub307
        sub307 22 November 2014 10: 55
        +3
        What a "kherurg". As far as I remember, "Raikin's husband" stuck to him. The rest of the Raikins are also remembered by everyone: father and son.
      6. The comment was deleted.
      7. boris-1230
        boris-1230 22 November 2014 11: 05
        +3
        Immediately you feel the "ear of Moscow", who else wrote such nonsense? fool
      8. alone
        alone 22 November 2014 11: 26
        +3
        Why should he say thanks? For hundreds of thousands of dead, battered, destitute people? No, I’m easier to curse him. I’m not going to forgive such scum.
      9. Peacemaker of the USSR
        Peacemaker of the USSR 22 November 2014 19: 47
        0
        Another "dill", which was sold to Obamka for "grandmother". Teaches fathers how to live.
        There is nothing to teach us to live, we have something to compare and
        THIS IS 300 TIMES MORE,
        than your (Samara Misha) opinion. Where are these in life? at least one such alive ...
      10. gorge1945
        gorge1945 23 November 2014 13: 48
        0
        Yes, not one Gorbachev had a hand in the collapse of Not the USSR but of Russia, not the last role belongs to Yeltsin and his henchmen, Berezovsky, Chubais and others. They are guilty of unleashing a civil war in Chechnya and the deaths of thousands of civilians and military personnel of the Russian army because of the mediocre leadership and betrayal of the highest echelons of power. They, at the direction of American advisers, ruined the Russian economy, brought the army and navy to an absurd state. So Gorbachev in comparison with Yeltsin and his minions is an angel.
    2. Giant thought
      Giant thought 22 November 2014 09: 20
      +16
      All the nations of the world do not like traitors, Russians are no exception, when meeting with him, he would have definitely thrown a rotten egg into him.
      1. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 22 November 2014 10: 04
        +11
        Quote: Giant thought
        All the nations of the world do not like traitors, Russians are no exception, when meeting with him, he would have definitely thrown a rotten egg into him.

        We are so smart now ... And in those days, after a series of funeral general secretaries, a kind of young talkative and courageous labeled one appeared .. The whole country opened its mouth listening to his twisted speeches (then Raisa Maximovna appeared) and the men realized who really controlled the country .. fermentation started, etc. Yeltsin appeared (a fighter with privileges pah ..) Well, then you all know how we all were bred like suckers .. We believed the state alas .. What will protect and will not give offense And now flap your wings Yes, if yes. .Russia seemed to have withstood that blow. Now the next wave is going according to the same scenario ... So we think we do not believe ... ... These are the things in the tank troops ... hi
        1. saag
          saag 22 November 2014 10: 15
          0
          Quote: MIKHAN
          We believed the state alas .. What will protect and will not give offense And now flap wings

          And now what's not the same?
          1. Vitaly Anisimov
            Vitaly Anisimov 22 November 2014 11: 32
            0
            Quote: saag
            Quote: MIKHAN
            We believed the state alas .. What will protect and will not give offense And now flap wings

            And now what's not the same?

            Absolutely not the same ... Now here we are communicating, exchanging opinions and info .. Russia is united as at all times it is the essence of statehood and unification for the sake of some kind of social ideas, well, like Peace in the whole world! Or the first ones were launched into space Gagarin! Or the Orbital Station is the first in orbit ..! Now we are being pressed chew hot dogs and drink cola .. and not fig rock the boat .. And we are bored to live like this .. the soul requires a swing so that eh .. ("lonely" bully I know)))
            1. alone
              alone 22 November 2014 22: 08
              0
              Vitaly, again pulled there?




              wassat
          2. Vitaly Anisimov
            Vitaly Anisimov 22 November 2014 11: 32
            -1
            Quote: saag
            Quote: MIKHAN
            We believed the state alas .. What will protect and will not give offense And now flap wings

            And now what's not the same?

            Absolutely not the same ... Now here we are communicating, exchanging opinions and info .. Russia is united as at all times it is the essence of statehood and unification for the sake of some kind of social ideas, well, like Peace in the whole world! Or the first ones were launched into space Gagarin! Or the Orbital Station is the first in orbit ..! Now we are being pressed chew hot dogs and drink cola .. and not fig rock the boat .. And we are bored to live like this .. the soul requires a swing so that eh .. ("lonely" bully I know)))
        2. Andrey44
          Andrey44 22 November 2014 10: 51
          +7
          Do not speak for EVERYONE. Even if I never harbored illusions about perestroika, glasnost, acceleration (acceleration then disappeared, if you remember) and I will never change my opinion about the traitors of the country, both past and present. I must be because I was born in 1968 and can my generation read between the lines? The least is contempt for the corrupt "elite", the least ...
          A student is simply dee from or bribed and dee from and I feel sorry for him.
      2. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 22 November 2014 10: 04
        +1
        Quote: Giant thought
        All the nations of the world do not like traitors, Russians are no exception, when meeting with him, he would have definitely thrown a rotten egg into him.

        We are so smart now ... And in those days, after a series of funeral general secretaries, a kind of young talkative and courageous labeled one appeared .. The whole country opened its mouth listening to his twisted speeches (then Raisa Maximovna appeared) and the men realized who really controlled the country .. fermentation started, etc. Yeltsin appeared (a fighter with privileges pah ..) Well, then you all know how we all were bred like suckers .. We believed the state alas .. What will protect and will not give offense And now flap your wings Yes, if yes. .Russia seemed to have withstood that blow. Now the next wave is going according to the same scenario ... So we think we do not believe ... ... These are the things in the tank troops ... hi
    3. Axis
      Axis 22 November 2014 09: 26
      +18
      Absolutely correctly noticed! Who also sends such young people (after all, he is a sophomore) to print? Or maybe he decided to "tear off popularity", went in the wrong direction ...
      We are actively "cultivating" such young people who look towards "democracy" with a sort of breathlessness, while at the same time not getting into the details of what is happening, and in this case, what happened.

      "People, let's tell the truth! We don't have enough publicity! We've been lying!" - Gorbachev

      When did we lie? When was Europe liberated from the Nazis? Or maybe when they insisted on not expanding NATO? Or in the case of arms limitation? The "political scientist" has a strange, one-sided approach.
      1. demon1978
        demon1978 22 November 2014 10: 21
        +4
        Immediately make a reservation: the claims that I did not live in those times and have no right to express my opinion, I strongly reject. The counter question is: who lived under Lenin, under Catherine the Great, under Peter the Great, under Ivan the Terrible? What should we now sit and be silent - they say, did not live, sit and be silent?

        This phrase says a LOT about the views of the author, on the knowledge of history - "I did not live at that time, it means that it WAS !!!! fellow And the opinions of contemporaries don't give a damn !!! Well, maybe not everything, but those who do not fit into my "fantasy", and who does not jump, you know who!
        It looks like the "author of the author's inspiration" was found !!! Super-high bell towers!
    4. Shveps
      Shveps 22 November 2014 09: 30
      +25
      Amazing young man Misha Samara.
      "... If you only knew that this sensible and well-mannered boy-child in mind, would spit all day long." - from his book "On the swing between the hills".
      Conclusion: the article is a spit of his thoughts on the majority of sane citizens of Russia.
      1. Raven1972
        Raven1972 22 November 2014 10: 36
        +3
        Quote: Shveps
        from his book "On the swing between the hills".

        And how much pathos is in the title))) Straight "Catcher in the Rye" no more and no less ... laughing
      2. valokordin
        valokordin 22 November 2014 10: 37
        +5
        Quote: Shveps
        Amazing young man Misha Samara.
        "... If you only knew that this sensible and well-mannered boy-child in mind, would spit all day long." - from his book "On the swing between the hills".
        Conclusion: the article is a spit of his thoughts on the majority of sane citizens of Russia.

        Well, while the boy-Kibalchish is fighting the bourgeois, this poet Samarsky is preparing books for death for his homeland about freedom.
      3. Penelope
        Penelope 22 November 2014 10: 48
        +3
        This Jude of the Soviet people should hang out hanging on an aspen bitch.
    5. Juborg
      Juborg 22 November 2014 09: 53
      +23
      Article trolling! Put your respect for this geek into a causal place. And then explain how, thanks to him, my relatives in Ukraine suddenly became my enemies !? Or why I didn’t just leave Kazakhstan in the 90s. And why there are so many of these that when meeting with the author, I personally am not responsible for my actions.
      1. Fast_mutant
        Fast_mutant 22 November 2014 10: 15
        +11
        I agree to 200%!
        Judging by where he (Gorbachev) chopped loot after the presidency, where he licked and praised him, he executed the state-dep-order very efficiently and, it seems, even exceeded his obligations.
      2. provincial
        provincial 22 November 2014 12: 18
        0
        And the bear put the order in Tihari to him, so think about how they relate to him up there (to the hunchback).
    6. Ermak
      Ermak 22 November 2014 10: 26
      +3
      Quote: GRF
      Who thanks the surgeon for the disgusting work done?

      Can a young man with milk on his lips consider himself so self-sufficient that he begins to call for something that he does not understand at all. Sometimes it happens that a person will say such a frank absurdity that you don’t know the answer right away to this ohine. Well, young, well, so he would argue why he had such an opinion.

      Quote: GRF
      Not for nothing did they say in Russia since ancient times that everyone judges from his own bell tower. So Mikhail Gorbachev’s bell tower was too high, so high that he saw from there something that we didn’t even guess. Saw and stunned.

      Is this an argument?


      He is a regular contributor to Eksmo Publishing House, where a special name series, Mikhail Samarsky. The best books for teens. "

      And what's that? Has soared up high? Self-conceit is generally amazing. Just like a child.

      Why do we need it? Do you want us to wear Oktyabryat stars from childhood, and then, having grown up a bit, marching in red ties? Do you want us, like you at one time, by hook or by crook, to join the Communist Party for promotion? Do you want us to read the newspaper "Pravda" and one and all voted "for"?

      Of course, it is better to drink energy drinks and run after clothes and an iPhone with an advantage. Does this "miracle" know what freedom is ?.
      1. Vlad_Rez
        Vlad_Rez 22 November 2014 10: 44
        +1
        Ermak said well, he does not even suspect how it was before Humpback, during his reign, well ...........
    7. Saburov
      Saburov 22 November 2014 10: 26
      +2
      The guy just taught history in all third-rate scribes such as Solzhenitsyn, Sinyavsky, Nekrasov and other crooks screaming about the famines and the Gulags.
      1. Saburov
        Saburov 22 November 2014 10: 28
        +7
        Unknowing people constantly operate on such a thing as the Gulag. Like, in the concentration camps sat 20,30,40 or 60 000 000 people. Already, the dumbfather takes after these numbers. But after the first shock, sobriety comes. One immediately wonders: “How could the state provide so many prisoners?”, “Who worked in the USSR?” And “Where did the budget money go?”
        So let's start in order. According to the most conservative estimates, 40 000 000 people sat in the Gulag, and according to immodest 60 - 110 000 000. So not a modest “citizen” was Solzhenitsyn. For those who do not know this third-rate scribbler, a dissident cosmopolitan and an ardent anti-Soviet. The author of the pseudo-documentary book “The Gulag Archipelago”, half written off from the Goebel’s campaign, half invented, in short, something from the genre of non-fiction. Suitable only to support the leg of a broken sofa. Russophobia brought him to such an idea that he suggested that the Americans almost openly fight with us, and at one of the press conferences the pseudo patriot openly supported the fascists Franco. But back to our topic.
        Let's temporarily agree with the liberals and imagine that in the USSR there really were 40 000 000 people. If you take from the 1922 year, then Stalin led the 31 year. It turns out that every year people were arrested and sent to the 1 290 322 camp, daily 3 535 people were sent to the camps. The numbers and, however, are discouraging, but this is bad luck. The state would have to face such problems as:
        1) Transportation
        2) Security
        3) Supply
        4) Provision of barracks
        5) Secrecy
        1. Saburov
          Saburov 22 November 2014 10: 28
          +4
          And most importantly, the goal. Why put so many people in camps? I do not understand.
          Let's start in order.
          Transportation. Here, for example, several thousand people were arrested. We cannot send them to the camp immediately. It is necessary to accumulate convicts for a longer time, because if we send small groups of people every day, we will disperse the security forces, and prisoners can scatter. Next, how to transport? By plane? By car? No, on foot or by train. Now think what it will cause. That's right - huge human columns marching along the roads. Of course, these masses of people would make a huge imprint in the memory of a simple layman. But people do not remember columns of convicts leaving the horizon. They remember German prisoners of war, but there are no prisoners. It turns out that either the NKVD put on invisible caps on the convicts, or the scale of the repressions was really insignificant.
          Buildings and supplies. Well, we arrived at our destination, what next? Buildings needed. Not just barracks, but in addition to them: a dining room, a medical unit, a warehouse, a bathhouse, a post office or telegraph office, a guardhouse or a mini barracks for security, a club and a library. In general, a lot of buildings. Then each convict needs to be given what, not what kind of linen, uniform, blanket, winter set of clothes, shoes. It needs to be fed, washed once a week, the first-aid kit in the medical unit should be equipped with at least bandages and iodine, as well as put together stools, put tables, plates, dishes to buy. In addition to the convicts, guards sit on your neck. They also need to give rations, sew a uniform, wash, heat, put them to bed, and even put a rifle or machine gun in their hands and tie a shepherd on a leash. That's how many hangers-on you have. And who will give money to them? You are a respected taxpayer. Where does the money come from? From the budget. Let us see and compare the expenses of the USSR budget for the Gulag.
          The memorandum of the people's commissariats of justice, internal affairs and the OGPU in the SNK of the RSFSR on the need to create a concentration camp system from 13 on April 1929 says that the content of a prisoner is reduced from 250rub a year to 100rub. And now it’s the turn to carefully calculate the money. Take the state budgets of 1935-37.
          1935g Revenues were 67 428 098 088rub, and expenses 66 391 102 047
          Of these, 1 707 419 378rub was spent for the needs of the NKVD, this amount includes not only the content of the GULAG, but also the salary of all NKVD employees, as well as their contents.
          1. Saburov
            Saburov 22 November 2014 10: 29
            +2
            Now let's do a simple multiplication action. We said that there were 40 000 000 people in the GULAG, we derive the average number of approximately 20 000 000 people. Now we multiply these people by 100rub, budget revenues, we get 2 000 000 000rub, only by the content of prisoners. This has already exceeded budget injections on 292 580 622rub. It turns out that our guards went around bloated, undressed, and the prisoners fattened? Not? This means that liberal figures are overstated.
            In addition, so that the reader does not accuse me of forgery, I give the figure of the NKVD officers.
            Border troops of the NKVD 167 600 troops
            The internal troops of the NKVD - 173 900 troops, including:
            operational troops (excluding military schools) - 27,3 thousand people;
            railroad protection troops - 63,7 thousand people;
            troops for the protection of critical industrial facilities - 29,3 thousand people.
            The number of escort troops was 38,3 thousand people.
            It turns out that the total number of employees ranged from 300 to 500 thousand people. This is another question about the police state. In the United States, according to the most conservative estimates, there are about 2-3 million people in the power structures.
            Now it remains to find out how much the NKVD officers received. I could not find the exact data regarding the salaries of the security forces. Therefore, you have to consider, based on the average annual salary in the USSR. We continue with the 1935 year. The average annual wage was 136 rubles. We multiply the average number of employees by salary: 400 000 by 136 we get 54 400 000 only by salary. But you still need to sew a uniform, arm and feed the guards. We continue our research.
            1. Saburov
              Saburov 22 November 2014 10: 29
              +2
              So we sorted out the security, there were prisoners. The usual diet of the prisoner was (per 1 person per day in grams):
              1200 rye bread
              Wheat flour 60
              Different groats 130
              Potato and vegetables 600
              Meat 30
              158 fish
              Vegetable Oil 12
              10 pasta
              Sugar 13
              Surrogate Tea 2
              10 Tomato Puree
              Capsicum 0,13
              Bay leaf 0,2
              Salt 20
              Not bad! Is not it?
              Oh, I almost forgot. In addition to everything else, the poor victims of “repression” were allowed to transfer money to relatives! I hope that after these lines you did not fall off the chair, in surprise. The Gulag was translated into self-sufficiency, that is, it became an enterprise. In the USSR, slavery and exploitation were prohibited, so workers were provided with wages. Roughly 100-200rub until 1941 year. As for the work, the working day was ten hours. However, they did not work every day; there were also weekends 5-8 per month.
              And now we continue to consider the budget.
              1936g.
              Revenue: 83 760 252 898
              Consumption: 83 760 252 898
              Of these, for the needs of the NKVD: 2 193 059 995
              Average salary in the NKVD: 82 800 000
              For the content of "20 000 000" people of the GULAG: 2 000 000 000.
              1. Saburov
                Saburov 22 November 2014 10: 29
                +4
                1937g.
                Revenue: 362,1 billion rubles
                Expense: 348,8 billion rubles
                At the NKVD: 2 052 673 600
                Of which: 8 billion for weapons
                82 800 000 for salary
                2 000 000 000 to the Gulag.
                As you can see, liberal figures are blatantly lying. The USSR could not have overpowered 20 000 000 prisoners. Now it remains to crush the last liberal argument. When you ask them: “Why was the Gulag needed?” The answer flies from them: “Slave labor is the most profitable, and in general we are all slaves, slaves, slaves ...”. Bullshit! I explain why.
                First, you need to decide where it is really necessary, slave labor. Well, first of all, on plantations in the tropical, equatorial belt. Sugar, coffee, cotton are very fastidious crops that need constant monitoring. It is necessary to weed weeds, water the plantings, collect everything by hand. Moreover, the demand for plantation products was high. However, slavery did not spread beyond the plantation economy. It was simply unprofitable. A skilled worker was many times better than an illiterate slave. The key factor was production costs. You need to feed the slave, give some rags, put the overseer, and he also needs supplies. Vicious circle! Workers are economically viable labor resources. I thrust 25 rubles to him and walk Petya wherever you want, only to come to work tomorrow.
                1. Saburov
                  Saburov 22 November 2014 10: 30
                  +4
                  Secondly, the USSR, like the Russian Federation, was mostly located in the northern part of the planet. Therefore, plantation production occupied a small strip or it did not exist at all. The bulk of agriculture was occupied by grain, which also did not tolerate slavery. For those who did not guess, I explain. Unlike cotton, grain is a very unpretentious product. You can trample it underfoot, carry it on the ground, thresh it, even bathe it in the mud (but it’s better not to do it) it won’t do anything, but try to do this with cotton or sugar. You will lose the whole crop. Then, the agricultural work in the USSR was mainly carried out once a year, and all the rest of the time the peasants could put it this way “rested, prepared for the next sowing season”. In this case, why do we need to keep a slave, if he works for six months, and the rest of the time sits on his neck? It is more cost-effective to take a wage worker or create collective farms working on a factory basis. The peasant became, as it were, a land proletarian, there is no personal land, but there is a salary.
                  I hope that along the way I managed to dispel the myth of the "profitability" of slavery.
                  Now, having prepared you, dear reader, I am ready to give the real numbers of the Gulag prisoners. Based on Soviet statistics (V.N. Zemskov “GULAG (historical and sociological research)” case study 1991g, History in documents. Russia 20 century. Archive of Alexander N. Yakovlev, with reference to the GARF.), I can say that the number of sitters permanently in places of deprivation of liberty did not exceed 3 million people.
                  Statistics of the number of prisoners of the Gulag (on 1 of January of each year).
                  Year In Forced Labor Camps (ITL) Of these, convicted of counter-revolution The same in% In forced labor colonies (ICT)
                  1. Saburov
                    Saburov 22 November 2014 10: 30
                    +3
                    1934 510307 135190 26,5
                    -
                    510307
                    1935 725483 118256 16,3 240259 965742
                    1936 839406 105849 12,6 457088 1296494
                    1937 820881 104826 12,8 375488 1196369
                    1938 996367 185324 18,6 885203 1881570
                    1939 1317195 454432 34,5 355243 1672438
                    1940 1344408 444999 33,1 315584 1659992
                    1941 1500524 420293 28,7 429205 1929729
                    1942 1415596 407988 29,6 361447 1777043
                    1943 983974 345397 35,6 500208 1484182
                    1944 663594 268861 40,7 516225 1179819
                    1945 715505 289351 41,2 745171 1460677
                    1946 746871 333883 59,2 956224 1703095
                    1947 808839 427653 54,3 912704 1721543
                    1948 1108057 416156 38,0 1091478 2199535
                    1949 1216361 420696 34,9 1140324 2356685
                    1950 1416300 578912 22,7 1145051 2561351
                    1951 1533767 475976 31,0 994379 2528146
                    1952 1711202 480766 28,1 793312 2504514
                    1953 1727970 465256 26,9 740554 2468524
                    Finally, in order to completely disarm the liberals, I would like to trace the demographic situation in the country.
                    The population of the USSR during the reign of Stalin increased sharply.
                    1926 (January) 148 656 000
                    1927 —-----— 147 028 000
                    1937 (January) 162 500 000
                    1939 (January) 168 524 000
                    1941 (June) 196 716 000
                    1946 (January) 170 548 000
                    1951 (January) 182 321 000
                    1959 (January) 208,800 000
                    1. Saburov
                      Saburov 22 November 2014 10: 30
                      +6
                      As you can see, before the war there was a rabid population growth. In the postwar years, the Union was able to make up for its losses in a very short period of time. However, if we follow the liberals' lead and believe in 20 000 000 convicts, the demographic situation will change dramatically. These prisoners will simply fly out of the population, while losing their reproductive function. Indeed, the main prisoners were men. Now imagine: 20 000 000 men were put in prison. Naturally, they will not be able to start a family and have children. This is already minus 20 - 60 000 000 people, unborn children. Also add losses in wars total minus 60-80 000 000 people. As a result, the population of the USSR would not be 208 800 000, but 108 - 158 000 000.
                      You say nonsense, but there are people who believe in the propaganda of Svanidze ... PS A person does not believe in anything so holy, of which he knows the least!
                      1. Saburov
                        Saburov 22 November 2014 10: 33
                        +7
                        And for a snack.
                  2. saag
                    saag 22 November 2014 10: 36
                    -5
                    Quote: Saburov
                    I hope that along the way I managed to dispel the myth of the "profitability" of slavery.

                    No, they didn’t dispel it, because it’s not a myth, the prisoners were not paid salaries, sick leave, sick leave, overwork, other work, nothing at all, it’s very profitable
                2. saag
                  saag 22 November 2014 10: 34
                  -4
                  Quote: Saburov
                  Bullshit!

                  Yes? Explain how the White Sea-Baltic Canal was built, where did the word "prisoner" come from?
                  1. Saburov
                    Saburov 22 November 2014 12: 49
                    +3
                    Read less nonsense, but if you are interested, I can personally take you to the archive, if you yourself are too lazy to make a request on a topic that interests you.
                  2. Saburov
                    Saburov 22 November 2014 12: 54
                    +1
                    In fact, according to archival documents, signed by the prisoners themselves, they agreed to build the Belomorkanal for additional ration, monetary charges and (hold on and don't fall) for revising the term of imprisonment.
                  3. alone
                    alone 22 November 2014 22: 11
                    0
                    Quote: saag
                    Yes? Explain how the White Sea-Baltic Canal was built, where did the word "prisoner" come from?


                    lol Now they will clearly explain to you that the Belomorkanal was built by employees and the NKVD apparatus.)))))))
    8. alien50
      alien50 22 November 2014 10: 35
      +3
      For which Iuh thank him? For the fact that the country has flown ????
      Or for the fact that in Privolnoy the guard of honor is still being carried around the clock around his house ????
    9. samoletil18
      samoletil18 22 November 2014 11: 04
      +2
      Quote: GRF
      disgusting work done?

      Right! This is how instead of the appendix, the entire cecum was removed. Well, you can somehow agree with the change in the economic and political system (and even with a stretch). Well, nafig, it was the whole country to collapse!
    10. shtanko.49
      shtanko.49 22 November 2014 11: 41
      0
      He is a combiner and not a surgeon, that’s it.
    11. nik_moy
      nik_moy 22 November 2014 12: 17
      0
      they just bought it, by the way, where does he live?
      1. miladiz
        miladiz 22 November 2014 22: 24
        0
        Born August 15, 1996. A student at Moscow State University (Department of Political Science), chairman of the Moscow regional branch of the Russian Youth Society of Political Scientists, founder of the Living Hearts charity fund for blind people. For two years he had a blog on the site of the radio "Echo of Moscow", stopped cooperation due to censorship.
        This author regularly publishes his nonsense in Vzglyad. Now he is there in the first column and the natives there teach him wits.
    12. The comment was deleted.
    13. siberalt
      siberalt 22 November 2014 12: 49
      +1
      The author did not live, but knows everything laughing One thing is right that Gorby watched from his belfry. But this is not a discovery at all. Everyone knows about this. He surrendered the country, hid in Pharos and waited to see who would win. In fact, he agreed, and immediately betrayed the Politburo and handed everyone over to Yeltsin. For him, the people were cattle. Why did he give him a ride on the referendum on the USSR?
      1. ququ
        ququ 23 November 2014 00: 22
        +2
        +++ The author was just born in 1996, and the country has already been privatized and even prepared for the 98 crisis. I would have lived on Gorbachev’s coupons with empty shelves, without powder and soap, on the legs of a bush and canned dogs, which sold like chicken sausages would have been a different attitude to the reformer. Personally, I’m 89 New Years and the line for champagne in Stoleshnikov Lane kilometer I remember very good. distinctly.
        And who remembers the post-perestroika monetary reforms of 91 ... 50-100 rubles of 61 had to be exchanged for 3 winter days ... millions of price tags ... and depreciation of deposits ...
        So that he .... x there in France, this corrupt fool. And in Russia they also write articles .... they would still be invited to teach ...
    14. Denis fj
      Denis fj 22 November 2014 13: 13
      +6
      Our young know-it-all already understood everything in this life, especially the role of Gorbachev in history. Nothing, still to come, the main thing is that the thinker should work.
      I note that the call for publicity is not a call for truth (everyone has their own truth), but only a call for the publication of all points of view, from which everyone is free to choose what seems to him closer to the truth.
      The problem is that the Soviet propaganda machine in the greenhouse conditions of the "Iron Curtain" relaxed so much that it immediately suffered a crushing defeat in a direct collision with the Western one (accustomed to fighting for a place in the sun). Which led to the destruction of the USSR.
      The USSR lost the propaganda war, namely that propaganda wars replaced the world war. If a state, for example, the USA, has an overwhelming superiority in propaganda, then it can do whatever it pleases (to bomb, whom you want, send troops where you want and ask no one - neither other powers, nor the UN Security Council) - the main thing is to rinse brains and bring world public opinion to their side.
      Therefore, glasnost led to the death of the USSR, but not because the Soviet people learned the truth, but because they were defenseless against the massive brainwashing of Western propaganda.
      China acted wiser - no publicity, first reforms, economic development, and then it will be seen.
      And where is China, and where is the USSR-Russia?
      Not all freedom is good. The freedom to fall into madness does not seem attractive to me personally. But it was precisely this freedom that M.S. Gorbachev to the Soviet people, relying on their "intellectual potential". Unfortunately, the potential for insanity was greater.
      Such are the cases.
      1. Ermak
        Ermak 22 November 2014 14: 19
        +5
        Not all freedom is good. The freedom to fall into madness does not seem attractive to me personally. But it was precisely this freedom that M.S. Gorbachev to the Soviet people, relying on their "intellectual potential". Unfortunately, the potential for insanity was greater.
        Such are the cases.

        Of course, someone gives anarchy for freedom.
        A Soviet person was born and with this he received the real right to be free, all that was required of him was to comply with certain principles, which today can be called rare, since they are moral from the point of view of a progressive society (and some of the old foundations of Russia), and these principles did not interfere, but on the contrary helped him to live, raise children (without fear that they will stumble upon information harmful to children's consciousness), teach for free, treat for free, get an apartment for free (relatively today, they also paid extra), learns himself free of charge, choose a profession in accordance with your vocation and not be afraid of losing your home due to the loss of your job, rest all over the Union, feel pride in your country, be an honest person and not be ashamed of it, not see homeless people on the street and such "pusi" ( and others like them), but to see Gagarin, Sakharov, Zhukov (albeit only in newspapers or on screens), to celebrate the New Year with the whole country, as one family, to be an activist or not t, to know that they will help if there is injustice ... the Soviet person did not need to survive, because - as he lived in the house that everyone was building together, the Soviet person did not need to fear that in old age he would have to work when health was already completely does not allow ..... and a lot - a lot of other things.
        1. Ermak
          Ermak 22 November 2014 14: 43
          +1
          and see Gagarin, Sakharov, Zhukov

          I apologize for slashing, because I’ll recover from Gagarin, Kozhedub, Pokryshkin, Tsiolkovsky, Zhukov and others
    15. razv35
      razv35 22 November 2014 17: 14
      0
      "Surgeon"??? Writer??? Blogger ??? MSU student ...
      One question: was the boy in the army? Before talking about life and political science ... You need to learn about life, but Echo of Moscow is not life yet ...
    16. izGOI
      izGOI 22 November 2014 22: 38
      -1
      I get in out of line to tell those who did not live in the 70s, not in the 80s. Who has not experienced all the charm of queues, coupons, sausage trains and trains. I say to those who grew up in the 90s and 2000s, YOU DO NOT JUDGE GORBACHEV. Separately, I say to those who, being an adult, an adult, in those very 80s, cursed Gorbachev for fighting drunkenness, and there were excesses in this struggle, but when there were no excesses? I want to say a very "BIG THANKS" to those who screamed at the glory of Yeltsin with foam at the mouth, who was not even Gorbachev's spotlight. And if Gorbachev is to blame for anything, it is only that he did not crush the emerging democracy and glasnost with tanks. Well, I would have run over, so they would now write to the glory of Gorbachev, who would have been elected President of the USSR for the seventh time.
      So: youth is NOT YOU TO JUDGE, but for those who are older, YOU ARE NOT GUILTY ?????
      And I don’t want to read the comments below, I read it back in the 70s, on the editorials of Pravda.
    17. ddd1975
      ddd1975 25 November 2014 08: 28
      0
      ... Posted by Mikhail Samarsky !!!
  2. RESEARCHER
    RESEARCHER 22 November 2014 09: 08
    +29
    Do not wait. After reading the article, only one is of interest. Who cultivates such young and early political scientists?
    1. demon1978
      demon1978 22 November 2014 09: 58
      +6
      Quote: RESEARCHER
      Do not wait. After reading the article, only one is of interest. Who cultivates such young and early political scientists?

      The answer is obvious !!! yes "Gardeners" from NGOs !!!
      1. Starover_Z
        Starover_Z 22 November 2014 10: 30
        +3
        Quote: demon1978
        "Gardeners" from NGOs !!!

        Or maybe the "author" is familiar with Makarka, on the basis of "Echo of Matza"? Then I won't be surprised.
    2. Kolya
      Kolya 22 November 2014 10: 43
      +1
      Quote: RESEARCHER
      Do not wait. After reading the article, only one is of interest. Who cultivates such young and early political scientists?

      Someone pays money to this "writer" for his works. The boy learned to write, and then he was either short in the analysis, or just a bad person.
  3. andrejwz
    andrejwz 22 November 2014 09: 09
    +11
    The country expects heroes from us all, and we ... bring forth young and early political scientists. He didn’t have time to understand anything, to live, to comprehend, but those who believe they have the right to assess the degree of legitimacy of the assessments of witnesses of what happened.
  4. Owl27
    Owl27 22 November 2014 09: 09
    +13
    A new generation of liberal youth is ready! You need to remember the name, suddenly the boy will go far.
    1. Buran
      Buran 22 November 2014 09: 33
      +7
      You need to remember the name, suddenly the boy will go far.


      He needs to break his legs, so that he would definitely not go anywhere else.
    2. boris-1230
      boris-1230 22 November 2014 11: 30
      +1
      Yes! This will go far if not stopped in time! angry
    3. romandostalo
      romandostalo 23 November 2014 02: 18
      0
      Nemtsov’s replacement is growing. Find a greenhouse where these young idiots are raised.
  5. tolyyn19
    tolyyn19 22 November 2014 09: 10
    +2
    Really, in order to live not in a lie, it is necessary to ruin the whole country.
    1. Mainbeam
      Mainbeam 22 November 2014 09: 32
      +7
      Now we live not in a lie?
    2. Kolya
      Kolya 22 November 2014 10: 33
      +2
      Quote: toliyn19
      Really, in order to live not in a lie, it is necessary to ruin the whole country.

      This is precisely the essence of Gorbachev's guilt. It goes without saying that before his arrival there were enough problems, but instead of solving them, he used them to completely destroy the way of life of 250 million people in the state, which was completely self-sufficient at that time. The Soviet Union did not need a surgical operation, but just a conservative treatment.
    3. Schoolboy
      Schoolboy 22 November 2014 10: 38
      0
      Having eaten sneakers what you can’t imagine.
  6. saag
    saag 22 November 2014 09: 13
    +20
    "... the self-rewarding rain of Leonid Ilyich"
    And who was worse off from this?

    "... Do you want us, as you did in your time, by hook or by crook to get into the Communist Party for promotion?"
    He-he-he, now they are trying to get involved in the United Russia party

    "... Do you want us to read the Pravda newspaper and all as one voted in favor?"
    Now they vote the same way, there were quite a lot of newspapers and magazines under the USSR

    "... Why do we need this?"
    Then, what is needed is one common goal, understandable and accepted by the majority of ideology, not dividing along national, religious and social grounds
    1. Schoolboy
      Schoolboy 22 November 2014 10: 48
      +7
      After reading the newspaper "Pravda" and writing about the shortcomings in the newspaper, one could say that there will be a reaction and action. Now local officials even spit on a letter to the President of the Russian Federation.
  7. gsg95588
    gsg95588 22 November 2014 09: 16
    +12
    Sprouts are poisonous seeds sown by the traitor Gorbachev and this author is one of them ...
  8. Klepa
    Klepa 22 November 2014 09: 17
    +2
    Mm, what is good in publicity and complete freedom of speech for the security of the state? Did Mr. Samarsky have a high school physics course? He does not understand that the state is a system, and does any system have a number of limitations in order to maintain stability? People historically united in states to ensure their rights and freedoms, the most important of which is the right to life. And if the state does not have self-regulatory restrictions, then it cannot guarantee our rights.
    1. Raven1972
      Raven1972 22 November 2014 10: 30
      +2
      Quote: Klepa
      Did Mr. Samarsky have a high school physics course?

      You will excuse me, but to call IT a master is too much honor for such individuals, another education imagining itself a nation’s conscience ... But this GMO was not taught or interested in physics at school, it’s also humanities am Ugh, no words, some emotions and those obscene about such individuals ... am
  9. Waroc
    Waroc 22 November 2014 09: 17
    +4
    And what a moronic craving to raise the collar of a shirt - do they feel better from that or something .......?
  10. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 22 November 2014 09: 17
    +16
    Dear author, if you are pleased to lick this TV .. r, please, no one forbids, lick, kiss all intimate places, but not x .... make a hero from the traitor of the Motherland, it may be a hero for you, but for me he was and is a traitor and damn him forever.
    1. RONIN-HS
      RONIN-HS 22 November 2014 10: 00
      0
      ... Dear author, if ...

      "Respected the author "is just sh ** k, too young to assess the scale of the betrayal. If Judas sold God, and therefore all of humanity, then Gorby-pod ** k betrayed exactly HALF [of the world. The units of the dimension of betrayal can be considered as follows: Judas = 1 unit; Gorby = oh, 5 Judas; and so on.

      It would be nice if this ***** survived until the day when the KAMAZ drove out from under its feet at the largest landfill in Moscow, and it remained hanging on the Judas' aspen. negative
      1. ver_
        ver_ 24 November 2014 08: 10
        0
        ... to the article about the birds, Judah is the wife of Christ (Prince Andrei Bogolyubsky-Emperor-reigned 3 years in Three) nee Kuchkova (the name of the area is Moscow colo ...) ..
  11. pahom54
    pahom54 22 November 2014 09: 18
    +11
    I can only say one thing of my own senile BUT: so we waited for the generation of cola and Pepsi to come into everyday life. The guy seems to be smart, and he doesn’t say stupid things, in some ways RIGHT - and yet, he does not understand how WRONG he is!

    "He was a man of his era ..."

    It would be better if he had never been ...
    1. lg41
      lg41 22 November 2014 09: 37
      +8
      Only small children and people who are sick on the head are not aware of their actions. This is by definition medical. All other people are aware. Or pretend. This fully applies to the author of the article, Mikhail Samarsky.
      Soros wrote about democracy very beautifully in his book "Experiment in Real Time". About the fact that democracy is good in a country that needs to be destroyed and unacceptable in a country that is moving forward in its development.
  12. raid14
    raid14 22 November 2014 09: 18
    +1
    Echo of Moscow, it is clear where the legs grow from, exchange "glasnost" for the whole country, can only be a traitor or a complete stupid person (which I doubt).
  13. quote
    quote 22 November 2014 09: 19
    +1
    The author's article, the result of malnutrition in childhood. The formation of the brain passed with deviations. 96 years of birth! "Glorious" years for the boy!
    1. AlexisFJ
      AlexisFJ 22 November 2014 09: 41
      +1
      Yes, he does not remember those "glorious" years. His brains appeared in the slightest degree when the country was slowly moving towards recovery. He does not know how we lived, or rather survived in the harshest conditions of the 90s.
  14. 73bor
    73bor 22 November 2014 09: 21
    +5
    How many times Gorbachev tried to understand what he was talking about and could not, his words did not add up to any thought, he spoke a lot and not about anything.
  15. Anatoly_1959
    Anatoly_1959 22 November 2014 09: 22
    +9
    To mix together the entire history of the USSR is the favorite method of the liberals. In principle, they are not interested in the fate of a particular person. What does it matter to this fellow that: the production economy is completely destroyed, millions of people perished in peacetime, millions of homeless children appeared, and the current "elite" is a gang of thieves and crooks. The main principle is FREEDOM. Freedom from what? Even in Soviet times I was absolutely free, unless it was difficult to go to the capitalist countries. Now it is clear why. With free high-quality education, the opening of borders became a pump for pumping out specialists, fortunately Gorbachev and his associates did everything to make physical survival the basis of life during this period. Gorbachev himself is a coward and a scoundrel, how many he betrayed, admiring himself in the mirror, oh, what a historical person I am. As for the author, this is a young politician who needs one thing to climb up. This is normal, there are always such people, but survival ...
    1. Mainbeam
      Mainbeam 22 November 2014 09: 39
      +2
      Quote: Anatoly_1959
      physical survival became the basis of life during this period

      Thinly spotted. Fucking here to run west for a good life
    2. Roman 57 rus
      Roman 57 rus 22 November 2014 09: 52
      +5
      That's it! Freedom from what? Give your cat freedom by throwing him out of the house ???
    3. pv1005
      pv1005 22 November 2014 09: 59
      +3
      Quote: Anatoly_1959
      As for the author, this is a young politician who needs

      As for the author, this is a young political PRSTSTIPTU that needs to be crushed in the bud.
  16. Grbear
    Grbear 22 November 2014 09: 23
    +10
    The author is a victim of the intellectual Maidan in our country. Judgments about, untested in their own skin, events always lead to "paradoxes" of conclusions, and the definitions embedded in the brains of the Maidan become axioms.

    The "crooked" brick, laid in the base of the structure, will definitely lead to collapse.
    Remember that face.
    1. Colonel
      Colonel 22 November 2014 09: 41
      +2
      Quote: GrBear
      Remember that face.

      I remembered it and put it in the archive. Only it seems that the surname is not real
      1. Raven1972
        Raven1972 22 November 2014 11: 23
        +1
        Quote: colonel
        I remembered it and put it in the archive.

        Yes sir !!!! Did the same soldier
  17. Demon
    Demon 22 November 2014 09: 24
    +2
    Quote: pahom54
    I can only say one thing of my own senile BUT: so we waited for the generation of cola and Pepsi to come into everyday life. The guy seems to be smart, and he doesn’t say stupid things, in some ways RIGHT - and yet, he does not understand how WRONG he is!

    I'm afraid that he will never understand
    1. Klepa
      Klepa 22 November 2014 09: 28
      +1
      He will understand if he is not so disappointed in life that he will not see anything valuable in it except money.
      1. Mainbeam
        Mainbeam 22 November 2014 09: 40
        +4
        Now, probably, he reads your comments and thinks: what kind of fools you are, you don’t understand elementary things!
        1. Denis
          Denis 22 November 2014 09: 54
          0
          Quote: MainBeam
          Now, probably, he reads your comments and thinks: what kind of fools you are, you don’t understand elementary things!

          So is he one of these?
          then it is clear
        2. Schoolboy
          Schoolboy 22 November 2014 11: 01
          +2
          I want to tell the author of the article that all the positive actions of Gorbachev (they were) were crossed out by his inaction on the coup d'etat of Yeltsin, Kravchuk and Shushkevich. And there is no forgiveness for him
      2. Tyumen
        Tyumen 22 November 2014 11: 20
        0
        Quote: Klepa
        that besides money, nothing valuable will be seen in it.

        And for such today, money is the only universal value.
        Why his talk about freedom and publicity, only to snatch. He did not say a word about his homeland or an external threat.
  18. woron333444
    woron333444 22 November 2014 09: 24
    +4
    as you at one time, by hook or by crook climbed into the Communist Party for promotion


    And now you need to be a member of United Russia in order to move through the service or do business. And what did Gorbachev do to boost the economy? Just ruined everything further. And not only the economy, but also the Army. And Yeltsin helped him to break apart further. For some reason, China is raising the economy, and the Communist Party.
  19. Russian jacket
    Russian jacket 22 November 2014 09: 24
    +13
    My grandmother, the deceased, was deported with her whole family from the Stavropol Territory. According to her, she knew the family of the teddy bears, they lived in a neighboring village. And yet, her words, after the start of perestroika and everything that this former combine was doing.
    "I would have known that such a homosexual would grow, I would not be too lazy to go and strangle the reptile." She lived for 84 years and forgave everything ... And despite the exile, maybe this is not the topic, but she always used to say that there was order in Stalin's time. And she always pointed out that when the local Stavropol state lords were conducting the grandfather's case, and when the Moscow investigators were in charge, there was a huge difference ... And the grandfather was not an innocent lamb. This she admitted the same. hi Well, according to the author. The echo of matzah speaks for itself.
    1. Denis
      Denis 22 November 2014 09: 50
      +4
      Quote: Russian quilted jacket
      Echo matzo speaks for itself

      Aftara-3,14dara drown in the same. This Judas herself will not hang herself
  20. Officer
    Officer 22 November 2014 09: 24
    +13
    The boy is a student at Moscow State University, the country's leading university. He knows nothing, has not studied anything, but he already writes this. Is this taught at Moscow State University? And we are looking for some "column" somewhere.
  21. 1536
    1536 22 November 2014 09: 25
    +9
    "As if before Gorbachev, the Soviet people were carelessly lying on the couch and quietly drinking vodka. Or we have already erased from the history of our country the civil war, famine and terror of the thirties, post-war ethnic and political cleansing, Nikita Sergeevich's cornflakes, Leonid Ilyich's self-rewarding rain, day checks of documents in cinemas under Andropov? Doesn't it all matter? Forgotten?

    Yes that's right. The Gorbachev phenomenon is a natural result of the activities of the CPSU, the top of which degenerated into a petty bourgeois and brought the country to disaster. And for salvation from this catastrophe, it is necessary to thank not Gorbachev - in fact, a petty party functionary, but the people, our Russian people, in which the feeling of self-preservation prevailed then, which saved him and Russia not one hundred years.
    So, dear, student of Moscow State University. Do not fool you anymore our people!
  22. Denis
    Denis 22 November 2014 09: 27
    +4
    I had the honor to personally see and listen to Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev
    That yes, the bastard was lying
    What is the author licking for?
    Judas contempt for both
  23. Amur
    Amur 22 November 2014 09: 28
    +3
    Humpback to the wall, the student spanked ass, echo of Moscow .... so what to do with it?
    You can only laugh at or regret EM, such an important Govnopolsky radio, if such idiots work there.
  24. an_pearl
    an_pearl 22 November 2014 09: 31
    +2
    Be vigilant - the fifth column does not sleep - its embryos are everywhere!
  25. Mainbeam
    Mainbeam 22 November 2014 09: 32
    +2
    An "interesting" interpretation of the merits of the country's leader: just say "tell the truth" and then ruin the country with no action. To read Machiavelli, so it directly says that the truth from the leader will not wait. It's like a broken clock showing the correct time twice a day. Likewise, you can hear the truth from the head of state if it coincides with his current goals. No, "marked" by his weakness as a leader, he could not save the state, and this is definitely not a merit.

    Under Gorbachev, social and science were at a high level, the price of oil fed the budget. There were all prerequisites to ensure that the welfare of the people increased. He profiled everything with his liberalism. Stability is not an unimportant component of the happiness of the masses. Undoubtedly, we are living better now: everyone has a car, we have a rest in Turkey, whatever products you want in the shops ... But there is no confidence in the future.
  26. Russ cue
    Russ cue 22 November 2014 09: 33
    +3
    Really. Everyone judges from their own bell tower. Yours, boy, the bell tower is too small, if not to say the pit ... But let’s, friends, not judge this young "political scientist" harshly, entangled in liberal nonsense. The reasoning smiled, but as a political scientist you may not succeed, author.
  27. IOwTZ
    IOwTZ 22 November 2014 09: 34
    +5
    This is not a political scientist. This is someone's son from the former.
    1. SAA
      SAA 22 November 2014 10: 33
      +1
      Rather a granddaughter. Already grown up and how his idol decided to teach us life.
  28. Panikovsky
    Panikovsky 22 November 2014 09: 35
    +11
    I will say this, in the era of perestroika was a grown man born in 1962 I saw everything with my own eyes, for this I suggest thanks not to Gorbachev. I have other words for him, but they are prohibited by the rules of the site.
    1. Russian jacket
      Russian jacket 22 November 2014 09: 38
      +6
      Exactly. I have the same attitude. Some mats about tagged creatures.
  29. orisa87
    orisa87 22 November 2014 09: 37
    +5
    The author of the article mudak, and humpbacked to eat compound feed for the collapse of the country in the outback (such episodes were, thanks to the hunchback, people did not have money for food, they had to eat compound feed. This is my opinion, I'm not going to argue.
  30. Junior, I
    Junior, I 22 November 2014 09: 38
    0
    Nowadays, young people cannot distinguish what is and what was. They did not live in the era of socialism, when the dollar was worth less than the ruble. And they should not be judged for this. Humpback is definitely to blame!
  31. Walk
    Walk 22 November 2014 09: 38
    +7
    I won't even discuss this opus. I'm just wondering how an 18 year old teenager wrote 8 books, became the founder and chairman. The fact that he does not hesitate to repeat the basic liberal clichés about the USSR is generally understandable. He himself does not deny that he did not live in those days. But in order to achieve such amazing results in his career, he must have the appropriate support. Who are the parents of this "prodigy" who, in his very young years, talks about the politics of a huge country? The collapse of the country was being prepared long before Gorbachev, who was only an executor under Yakovlev and Shevardnadze. That's who really needed to be judged. And what this young creature calls democracy and glasnost, in fact, was legalized by permissiveness, robbery and slander. However, now this can be seen on the example of Ukraine. There now, if according to Gorbachev, also democracy and glasnost.
  32. bubla5
    bubla5 22 November 2014 09: 38
    +11
    So the puppies began to whitewash labeled Judas
  33. Denis
    Denis 22 November 2014 09: 40
    +6
    The most disgusting thing is that when this ... finally dies, they will bring me to bury here, also with honors
  34. koksalek
    koksalek 22 November 2014 09: 40
    +6
    The first time I set a minus for trying to smear this monstrous, treacherous spot on the clear conscience of the people. Judas cannot be reincarnated by giving him angel wings
  35. 12571752dima
    12571752dima 22 November 2014 09: 41
    +6
    At stake, both! .. I’ll imprison Kolya with my own hand. negative
    1. orisa87
      orisa87 22 November 2014 09: 44
      +3
      I will help sharpen stakes.
    2. podpolkovnik
      podpolkovnik 22 November 2014 09: 48
      +4
      Quote: 12571752dima
      At stake, both! .. I’ll imprison Kolya with my own hand. negative

      Correct solution!
      Support!
  36. ochakow703
    ochakow703 22 November 2014 09: 42
    +6
    For a future political scientist, a very small article. Of course, I am against indiscriminately finding fault with the past, this is our history, and whether it is good or bad, we have to live with it. Only the boy weakly represents the whole drama of the events of those years. In my opinion (not a political scientist), a person simply does not feel that he belongs to the country of Russia. He deeply does not care about the USSR and Russia. This is an individual fixated on European and other "values", and the word Freedom in his writings sounds sweet precisely because of this. This is a bad sign. Such "political scientists" need to be treated with labor, it is a pity that there are no Komsomol construction projects now, so if he plowed for the good of the Fatherland, other thoughts would come to mind. And so ... a simple consumer of goods created by others.
  37. leroff
    leroff 22 November 2014 09: 44
    +8
    The young man had to be born in the Fergana Valley and catch the disintegration of the country, finding himself an outcast in his small homeland, perhaps then the attitude towards the "marked" would have been different. The demagoguery and consensus of hump have cost us dearly, and unfortunately the cancerous tumors of the Soviet Union have not been removed and it seems that no one seriously wants to deal with them, because the elite is happy with it. Today Russia is repeating the path of the USSR, the late Brezhnev.
  38. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 22 November 2014 09: 45
    +6
    Lord, what does this "greenhouse plant" know about life? It did not serve in the army, did not hold anything heavier than a "ballpoint pen" in its hands, but you see how proud it is of its "achievements" -MGU, writes books - leads it at the end, like to boast .... - well, a typical "teligent" , the "creative" representative of the young parasitic generation, producing nothing, the so-called "self-maker." It also tries to lecture people who have survived the 90s, such as saying "thank you" to another "spotted" hogwash with his stupidity and stupidity, who ruined what was created by the sweat and blood of all the people. GULAG and "tightening the screws", you see, it got scared, how "gentle" we are. Ugh, D.E.R. L.M.O.
  39. podpolkovnik
    podpolkovnik 22 November 2014 09: 46
    +11
    Gorbachev accomplished the feat. In fact, he is a Hero of both the Soviet Union and a Hero of Russia.
    This man opened the window in our house and let in fresh air.

    Thank you.
    I read - poured ...
    1. Dry_T-50
      Dry_T-50 22 November 2014 19: 51
      +2
      Quote: podpolkovnik
      Gorbachev accomplished the feat. In fact, he is a Hero of both the Soviet Union and a Hero of Russia.
      This man opened the window in our house and let in fresh air.

      Thank you.
      I read - poured ...

      What a vile face he has!
  40. valentinych
    valentinych 22 November 2014 09: 46
    +7
    Quote: raid14
    Echo of Moscow, it is clear where the legs grow from, exchange "glasnost" for the whole country, can only be a traitor or a complete stupid person (which I doubt).

    Labeled sold not only our country, but how many real victims were in the GDR! His name is one-Judas!
    As for the author of the article, yes, these are seedlings of the seed thrown by Mecheny. Echo and nurtures such writers and political scientists.
  41. Drunya
    Drunya 22 November 2014 09: 50
    +5
    Konstantin Semin. Agitprop dated November 22, 2014
    The Yugoslav radio station B92 was first aired in the spring of 1989 at a frequency of 92,5 FM. The founder was Belgrade philologist Veran Matic, and the sponsors were the Soros Foundation and USAID, the American Agency for International Development, in other words, the CIA. From the very beginning, B92 tried to be not so much a radio station as a political party, a point of attraction for all anti-state forces.

  42. podpolkovnik
    podpolkovnik 22 November 2014 09: 51
    +7
    Two years blogging on the site of the radio "Echo of Moscow"
    1. boris-1230
      boris-1230 22 November 2014 11: 47
      +1
      There are enough ice axes for all the "truth lovers"!
  43. 1536
    1536 22 November 2014 09: 54
    +2
    Our "higher school" is preparing a worthy replacement with the connivance of aged rectors and enemy ambassadors. The student bombers are so romantic, so modern. And London, if something happens, will embrace, as has already happened more than once, and the congress there will help to conduct and take a course towards revolution in Russia (sorry, on "perestroika 2.0"). Only, you need to hurry, there are too many "fighters for freedom and progress" now that you may not have time to distribute the elephants.
  44. tomcat117
    tomcat117 22 November 2014 09: 54
    +1
    Sorry, thanks for what?
    There is no forgiveness to the hunchback !!!
  45. el.krokodil
    el.krokodil 22 November 2014 09: 56
    +2
    here hell and not thanks .. a bullet or a loop for free .. it would be interchanged with saddam if only it were possible ..
  46. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 22 November 2014 09: 58
    +3
    He came to one of Moscow's stores to present his new book.
    And what, on business, they’re not letting him go further than stores? Did he realize what he had done?
    Born August 15, 1996. Student of Moscow State University (Department of Political Science),
    It is because of such undereducated students that the Maidans are obtained.
  47. legolden
    legolden 22 November 2014 09: 59
    +4
    And this person writes books for teenagers !!! ??? Thus instills his perverted thoughts to the younger generation! Where does censorship look?
    1. Schoolboy
      Schoolboy 22 November 2014 11: 04
      +1
      For people like him, censorship was canceled.
  48. svp67
    svp67 22 November 2014 10: 00
    +4
    Let's say thank you to Gorbachev
    Personally, I WILL NOT say this to him ...
    “... I don’t care that the criminal who destroyed the country, condemned millions of people to death, to torment, suffering, humiliation, has not yet been punished for his deeds. He must bear criminal responsibility. He destroyed the lives of millions of people, and the best years of the lives of those people went in search of a piece of bread, to survive ... ”
    It is quite obvious that this can be written by people who either do not know the history of our country or who do not want to be free.
    So say the majority of people who lived in the USSR, simply because it was in their fate, and this page of life for many is far from the best ...
    Involuntarily the thought comes: when and in what country did people not get food and did not strive for survival?
    But few from the peaks, fell so quickly and low from just "working" to just "getting food" and from just "living" to just "surviving"
  49. sv68
    sv68 22 November 2014 10: 00
    +3
    For a hunchback on the grave, only wine with an inscription - '"let the earth be a glass wool jackal for you" must be put. Only first you must put him in the grave himself.
  50. askort154
    askort154 22 November 2014 10: 00
    +7
    Young political scientist, have you ever wondered why "Gorbachev's perestroika" carrying "freedom of speech and glasnost" led to the collapse of the state. Or is it not important for you? Gorbachev turned out to be a pure populist, behind him there was no
    programs. He blatantly lied to society, he did not believe in his "ideas." The people were led, and he betrayed him. He showed cowardice,
    when heroism was required of him. He stirred the hive and despicably fled. Actually, the current political scientists from Moscow State University have a strange preparation. Or is it the influence of Echo ?!