Alexander Zhilin. The war has already crossed the threshold of Russia ...
Many theorists, speaking of war, mean something almost abstract, an evil that arises from the will of politicians. Meanwhile, any war is, above all, a business project. No more. And start her global finance. And the presidents, politicians of the first magnitude, promoted political scientists and journalists are only highly paid service personnel.
Wars never begin with a bay-floundering. No president can start a war at his own discretion or political whim, for the sake of some national interests of his country. He has neither the strength nor the real authority for this. And the national interests of his country are directly tied to global finance, whose interests are always primary.
Local and world wars begin after the world financial structures set goals, set up a business plan, meticulously evaluated the debit and credit of the upcoming war. And already on the basis of business interests, the methods, forces and means of warfare are determined, taking into account their cost and payback, already in the course of hostilities.
No world class financial group will ever start a small war at a loss. Cost and profit here in the first place, as in any business. Have you ever wondered why the same US intelligence agencies are testing, say, bacteriological weapons in the poorest countries? Yes, because there is an absolutely insolvent people, the killing of which does not bear big losses and dangers for global finances, financial and industrial giants, etc.
What to say about the big war! The authors and performers of the Cold War against the USSR spent a lot of money. Creating only one anti-matrix of the Soviet Union was worth billions. But in the end, everything was paid back a hundredfold in financial, political and military relations! Multiple !!! We still pay for defeat in this war. We are still conceptually occupied by anti-Russian forces. In all wars, money is fighting for even more money. The market is a competition. Competition is war. War is the continuation of financial and economic activities by other means.
Why all this talk?
Moreover, there will be no repetition of something like the Second World War. Expensive. Not so effective. Dangerously.
Modern weapons are so expensive that their use is more expensive than the expected gain. And if you take into account the retaliatory strike and the price of possible indestructible damage, it turns out that the war with yesterday’s methods is unprofitable!
That is why the war was started against Russia by other means and methods - information-terrorist. While the information component dominates, but everything is ahead. It will take quite a bit of time and a massive recruitment of terrorists will begin as a cheaper tool for fighting against our country.
5 thousand militants are much cheaper than a tank platoon. Wherein tank the platoon lives on the battlefield for 13-18 minutes. And try to destroy the 5 thousand terrorists who do not form the front line: they do not enter into combat contact with the troops at all. Terrorists mingle with the local population, against which they begin terror. Therefore, you can’t use nuclear weapons against them. Even conventional artillery is problematic. And they can bring much greater trouble than a tank platoon on the battlefield ...
Where are the militants recruited? In the territories of neighboring states, brought to absolute poverty. In our case, the American special services in Ukraine are already beginning to recruit and train them. They are trained, including in battles in the South-East.
The whole mess that happens in this country has several goals. One of them is to bring the population to a bestial state in order to then hire as many militants as necessary for a penny. Already today, marginalized punishers are fighting in the South-East not for money, but only for the promise of the masters of gangs to pay absolutely meager amounts. Punishers feed exclusively on looting.
In a state of poverty, Ukraine is becoming an inexhaustible source of replenishment of the terrorist army in the war against Russia. The second source of militants is the Caucasus, which they are constantly trying to set fire to ... The third is Tatarstan ...
The authors of the information-terrorist war, creating its model, calculated everything to the smallest detail.
It is impossible to win Russia according to the algorithm “army against army”, without receiving in response a colossal opposition, which will lead to irreparable losses. This means that the entire military component must be neutralized. And this can only be done by an army of militants, which has no goal to defeat the enemy in battle. The goal is war as a tool for the destruction of the economy, financial system, the entire statehood system. Terrorists are fighting civilians, wreaking havoc and panic. Chaos and panic turn the territory into a zone full of nightmare! Under current conditions, there is no way to protect civilians in an information and terrorist war. No country, no matter how rich, is not capable of turning every kindergarten, every maternity hospital, every school into an impregnable fortress ... No army, no police, no money is enough to protect all vulnerable social facilities.
Take, for example, the events of September 11 in the United States. The attack on the twin towers, shown live by TV channels, drove American society into shock. But this ominous show was carried out and controlled, and therefore the goals were achieved without prejudice to statehood. Now imagine that this operation would be carried out, for example, by one of the Arab countries, and at the same time the explosions occurred in Washington, Chicago, Indianapolis. And in two or three cities, hospitals, schools, metro stations would be captured or shot ... That's it! The country would have collapsed on its knees, and the terrorists in the chaos created would only have to maintain a degree of tension, destroying significant objects and terrorizing civilians ... Would the United States hold out for so long in such a state of terror? Not. There is enough snowfall to make the population fall into a stupor, and the life of society was paralyzed ...
The same can be said about any EU country ...
We also have a sad experience. Dubrovka, Beslan ... To cope with the terrorists, every time we threw the best forces to the scene, the coolest special forces, everything that the state had in this respect. And if 20 Dubrovks or 30 Beslans happened in a country at a time? The consequences would be monstrous. The state objectively does not have the strength and means to cope with such a terrorist strike ...
World experience shows that no city can be liberated from militants without destroying it. An example of this is the events in Syria, where localities seized US-trained terrorist units. Against groups in 20 - 40 people have to use thousands of soldiers, hundreds of armored vehicles and heavy artillery, whose combat effectiveness against bandits is not obvious.
Where do gangsters buy weapons? Buy on the black market? Not at all! An example is the first Chechen military campaign. Terrorist groups with machine guns entered the republic. Immediately attacked the police stations and replenished their stocks. Then they were navigated by military warehouses and got grenade launchers, MANPADS, equipment, and a huge amount of ammunition. The chain here is simple.
It is necessary to understand a simple thing: civilians are the most vulnerable to terrorist units, and neither the army nor the police are able to protect them. Meanwhile, it is civilians who are the main target of hostilities. Two dozen terrorist groups on 20 - 30 people can put a million-plus city on their knees in 24 hours. Just destroying civilians right and left, setting houses on fire, etc. At the same time, terrorists have absolutely no need to engage in combat with units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the army or the police. What for? They have no purpose to seize the city and keep it under their full control. The task is to paralyze the vital activity of the city with all its industry, economy and banks through the elimination of the management system. The task is not to conquer, but to destroy!
How can you resist terrorist units in the conditions of human settlements?
There is a certain experience. Some states follow the path of creating so-called military-mobilization commandant's offices in localities. Their goal is to keep under arms something of a squad of civilians. This is not military service. We are talking about the creation of certain forces that are prepared to quickly arrive at the mobilization point or immediately to combat positions at X-hour or tie up terrorists (surround them, cut off escape routes, etc.) before the arrival of police or military forces. . Tactical exercises are conducted with these guards, people are trained in combat defensive actions, and even combat coordination is conducted. Management systems for these mobresources are being created. There are junior commanders, people know each other. What is called, everyone knows his maneuver. Even gathering an alarm, these forces are able to quickly organize and effectively resist the enemy.
I note that most of the losses in the Donbas among our volunteers we carried precisely because there was no elementary organization, combat coherence, and people did not understand what they needed to do.
We also have domestic experience. Everyone has already forgotten that the police was created primarily as a tool for self-defense of territories from gangs sweeping over the country. And she was truly folk. Plus, the Cossacks as a people's power structure, as a system of local security. Then the true communists Sverdlov and Trotsky converted the people's militia into a convoy for the people, and with the Cossacks they fought a merciless fight, shooting Cossacks, Cossacks and Cossacks by the tens of thousands. The people should not have defenders. It only required executioners ...
There are other effective means and methods of confrontation in the information-terrorist war, about which there is no point in talking in the open press.
The main question is how much time do we have to take the necessary measures, and is there an understanding of what exactly needs to be done?
Wars never begin with a bay-floundering. No president can start a war at his own discretion or political whim, for the sake of some national interests of his country. He has neither the strength nor the real authority for this. And the national interests of his country are directly tied to global finance, whose interests are always primary.
Local and world wars begin after the world financial structures set goals, set up a business plan, meticulously evaluated the debit and credit of the upcoming war. And already on the basis of business interests, the methods, forces and means of warfare are determined, taking into account their cost and payback, already in the course of hostilities.
No world class financial group will ever start a small war at a loss. Cost and profit here in the first place, as in any business. Have you ever wondered why the same US intelligence agencies are testing, say, bacteriological weapons in the poorest countries? Yes, because there is an absolutely insolvent people, the killing of which does not bear big losses and dangers for global finances, financial and industrial giants, etc.
What to say about the big war! The authors and performers of the Cold War against the USSR spent a lot of money. Creating only one anti-matrix of the Soviet Union was worth billions. But in the end, everything was paid back a hundredfold in financial, political and military relations! Multiple !!! We still pay for defeat in this war. We are still conceptually occupied by anti-Russian forces. In all wars, money is fighting for even more money. The market is a competition. Competition is war. War is the continuation of financial and economic activities by other means.
Why all this talk?
Moreover, there will be no repetition of something like the Second World War. Expensive. Not so effective. Dangerously.
Modern weapons are so expensive that their use is more expensive than the expected gain. And if you take into account the retaliatory strike and the price of possible indestructible damage, it turns out that the war with yesterday’s methods is unprofitable!
That is why the war was started against Russia by other means and methods - information-terrorist. While the information component dominates, but everything is ahead. It will take quite a bit of time and a massive recruitment of terrorists will begin as a cheaper tool for fighting against our country.
5 thousand militants are much cheaper than a tank platoon. Wherein tank the platoon lives on the battlefield for 13-18 minutes. And try to destroy the 5 thousand terrorists who do not form the front line: they do not enter into combat contact with the troops at all. Terrorists mingle with the local population, against which they begin terror. Therefore, you can’t use nuclear weapons against them. Even conventional artillery is problematic. And they can bring much greater trouble than a tank platoon on the battlefield ...
Where are the militants recruited? In the territories of neighboring states, brought to absolute poverty. In our case, the American special services in Ukraine are already beginning to recruit and train them. They are trained, including in battles in the South-East.
The whole mess that happens in this country has several goals. One of them is to bring the population to a bestial state in order to then hire as many militants as necessary for a penny. Already today, marginalized punishers are fighting in the South-East not for money, but only for the promise of the masters of gangs to pay absolutely meager amounts. Punishers feed exclusively on looting.
In a state of poverty, Ukraine is becoming an inexhaustible source of replenishment of the terrorist army in the war against Russia. The second source of militants is the Caucasus, which they are constantly trying to set fire to ... The third is Tatarstan ...
The authors of the information-terrorist war, creating its model, calculated everything to the smallest detail.
It is impossible to win Russia according to the algorithm “army against army”, without receiving in response a colossal opposition, which will lead to irreparable losses. This means that the entire military component must be neutralized. And this can only be done by an army of militants, which has no goal to defeat the enemy in battle. The goal is war as a tool for the destruction of the economy, financial system, the entire statehood system. Terrorists are fighting civilians, wreaking havoc and panic. Chaos and panic turn the territory into a zone full of nightmare! Under current conditions, there is no way to protect civilians in an information and terrorist war. No country, no matter how rich, is not capable of turning every kindergarten, every maternity hospital, every school into an impregnable fortress ... No army, no police, no money is enough to protect all vulnerable social facilities.
Take, for example, the events of September 11 in the United States. The attack on the twin towers, shown live by TV channels, drove American society into shock. But this ominous show was carried out and controlled, and therefore the goals were achieved without prejudice to statehood. Now imagine that this operation would be carried out, for example, by one of the Arab countries, and at the same time the explosions occurred in Washington, Chicago, Indianapolis. And in two or three cities, hospitals, schools, metro stations would be captured or shot ... That's it! The country would have collapsed on its knees, and the terrorists in the chaos created would only have to maintain a degree of tension, destroying significant objects and terrorizing civilians ... Would the United States hold out for so long in such a state of terror? Not. There is enough snowfall to make the population fall into a stupor, and the life of society was paralyzed ...
The same can be said about any EU country ...
We also have a sad experience. Dubrovka, Beslan ... To cope with the terrorists, every time we threw the best forces to the scene, the coolest special forces, everything that the state had in this respect. And if 20 Dubrovks or 30 Beslans happened in a country at a time? The consequences would be monstrous. The state objectively does not have the strength and means to cope with such a terrorist strike ...
World experience shows that no city can be liberated from militants without destroying it. An example of this is the events in Syria, where localities seized US-trained terrorist units. Against groups in 20 - 40 people have to use thousands of soldiers, hundreds of armored vehicles and heavy artillery, whose combat effectiveness against bandits is not obvious.
Where do gangsters buy weapons? Buy on the black market? Not at all! An example is the first Chechen military campaign. Terrorist groups with machine guns entered the republic. Immediately attacked the police stations and replenished their stocks. Then they were navigated by military warehouses and got grenade launchers, MANPADS, equipment, and a huge amount of ammunition. The chain here is simple.
It is necessary to understand a simple thing: civilians are the most vulnerable to terrorist units, and neither the army nor the police are able to protect them. Meanwhile, it is civilians who are the main target of hostilities. Two dozen terrorist groups on 20 - 30 people can put a million-plus city on their knees in 24 hours. Just destroying civilians right and left, setting houses on fire, etc. At the same time, terrorists have absolutely no need to engage in combat with units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the army or the police. What for? They have no purpose to seize the city and keep it under their full control. The task is to paralyze the vital activity of the city with all its industry, economy and banks through the elimination of the management system. The task is not to conquer, but to destroy!
How can you resist terrorist units in the conditions of human settlements?
There is a certain experience. Some states follow the path of creating so-called military-mobilization commandant's offices in localities. Their goal is to keep under arms something of a squad of civilians. This is not military service. We are talking about the creation of certain forces that are prepared to quickly arrive at the mobilization point or immediately to combat positions at X-hour or tie up terrorists (surround them, cut off escape routes, etc.) before the arrival of police or military forces. . Tactical exercises are conducted with these guards, people are trained in combat defensive actions, and even combat coordination is conducted. Management systems for these mobresources are being created. There are junior commanders, people know each other. What is called, everyone knows his maneuver. Even gathering an alarm, these forces are able to quickly organize and effectively resist the enemy.
I note that most of the losses in the Donbas among our volunteers we carried precisely because there was no elementary organization, combat coherence, and people did not understand what they needed to do.
We also have domestic experience. Everyone has already forgotten that the police was created primarily as a tool for self-defense of territories from gangs sweeping over the country. And she was truly folk. Plus, the Cossacks as a people's power structure, as a system of local security. Then the true communists Sverdlov and Trotsky converted the people's militia into a convoy for the people, and with the Cossacks they fought a merciless fight, shooting Cossacks, Cossacks and Cossacks by the tens of thousands. The people should not have defenders. It only required executioners ...
There are other effective means and methods of confrontation in the information-terrorist war, about which there is no point in talking in the open press.
The main question is how much time do we have to take the necessary measures, and is there an understanding of what exactly needs to be done?
Information