On the essence of the Russian government

29
On the essence of the Russian government

Many in Russia understand that the Russian authorities are by their very nature “anti-people” since they have been pursuing a policy against the peoples of Russia for two decades. Although the majority of the authorities, in reality, "do not care" for the people. It is clear that there are few direct "enemies", according to Stalin's expression, or enemy "agents of influence". The bulk of them are engaged in what they would do, by virtue of their psyche, which is far from the ideals of humanity, the overwhelming majority and the “ordinary” citizens of Russia are getting rich. In 1991, the opportunity arose to rob a huge civilization, in front of the riches of which all the treasures of the ancient Mayans, Aztecs, or Indian rajas pale.

It’s clear that they don’t want to go too far, so in Putin’s power 1999 turned out to be V. Putin, to find a balance between plunder and the most elementary interests of the population (at least in plain sight) - education, medicine, work, water cranes and so forth. Rob was so profitable that the ruling clans were objectively on the side of the people - the collapse of Russia was not in their interests. The main task of the political elite, as was the process of ensuring the prosperity of a narrow group, which began to belong to the real assets of the entire people. More or less tolerably, those who were close to the “pipe” (all directions of exporting the country's wealth — from military and space technologies to the forest, crude oil, children, women), and the creative intelligentsia serving the government, plus all kinds of artists, workers spheres of brain removal to the population.

The "anti-people" essence of the elite can be proved with just one sign. Where do children study and live, where do they buy property, where do they keep their capital? In the West.

But for a certain period of time, the Russian elite sensed a threat to their assets — the planet was "smelled" by the real world war, the loss of control over the richest part of the land. As a result, two groups began to stand out in the “elite”, those who want to continue the course of “democratization” and “privatization” as a result of completing the operation to solve the “Russian question”. Another group includes those who want to keep Russia's assets behind them. As a result, this group objectively plays on the side of the people, but not because they are so good, but simply because they feel that they are the “masters” of this vast territory, and they don’t want to give up power over it. In addition, there is an understanding that they are currently in the elite of the entire planet. And who will they be if they surrender Russia?

Understanding this, one can assess the actions of V. Putin - which at the same time irritates patriots of Russia and at the same time is repeatedly noted in actions that objectively play to the benefit of Russia. For example: lobbying the interests of Russia in India, Venezuela, etc. In the same vein, one can understand the feverish attempts to reanimate the military-industrial complex, arm the army, into which parties of the new weapons, contracts for the purchase of new weapons. If Russia is occupied, the political elite will lose its assets, so the "gnomes" must be armed. Therefore, there is an attempt to eliminate the threats inside - in the form of Islamic radicalism.

But since there is no complete concept of how to implement the Russia Forward program, there are a lot of mistakes at the exit. Rob and "cut" because it is much easier than to build. Hence all the attempts to “raise Russia” to the best of their understanding - all these “skolkovo” investments in the Olympics, the APEC summit, the football championship. Feverish attempts to carry out the integration process in the CIS.

The main reason for all this “stirring” is the pressure of global processes, the world smells like a lot of blood, the United States staggers, Jews are fleeing Israel, the destructive processes in the EU and at the same time leading to the creation of a single neo-fascist Europe, the Arab world is already burning. Interesting processes are also taking place in China - explosions, terrorist acts in national suburbs, and unrest in large cities.

Part of the Russian elite is objectively "playing" on the side of the peoples of Russia. Although not professional, preserving its anti-people’s essence. But specifically this historical our interests coincided for a period of time - Russia and its statehood must be preserved. All kinds of liberals, Nemtsovs, Prokhorovs, Kasparovs, etc., are busy with not rocking the boat in which we live. The people are objectively not interested in a revolution when such a difficult situation is on the planet. It’s better to watch on TV how London and other European cities are smashed, how the US National Guard will pacify riots and rebellions, how Israel will crush. And there it will be seen. There is still no other political elite, the victory of the revolution in Russia will lead to a repetition of the situation of 1917-1921 and not the fact that our people will be able to pass this test. The revolution will lead to the collapse of the country into Bantustans, interventions, hunger (given the fact that there are already few peasants in the Russian Federation, the population will be significantly thinned out), epidemics, and massacres on ethnic and religious grounds.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    20 August 2011 09: 30
    I fully agree with the author of the article. The question is WHAT TO DO? and in general is it possible to change the situation in Russia or not? Soon, the elections seem to be possible, but how the people will vote in their majority and how honestly the votes will be counted remains a big question. You look on TV, and everything has already been decided there, only the last question remains unresolved, who will be the president of DAM or GDP. If GDP comes, then he will be able to steer 12 again for years in a row. Is GDP entitled to be the president of Russia for the third time?
  2. fedora
    0
    20 August 2011 11: 01
    And I agree with the author. Simple, accessible and accurate analysis and conclusions from the situation in Russia.
  3. +5
    20 August 2011 11: 43
    The "anti-people" essence of the elite can be proved with just one sign. Where do children study and live, where do they buy property, where do they keep their capital? In the West.


    This says it all and more, in fact, nothing is needed. In addition, this list of four items can be continued.
  4. Shind76
    0
    20 August 2011 12: 09
    is everything interesting to me? when - then the people will think about it and finally tell their opinion ... I do not provoke a revolution ... but I’m already very tired of it all))))))
  5. Max
    Max
    -10
    20 August 2011 13: 21
    The author probably forgets that at the beginning of the 21st century, Russia was put on a par with the countries of Africa in the social sphere. provision, salaries, etc. Now dudes receive on average, as in Portugal ... Russia was literally raised from shit and revived, but talk about * anti-people’s essence * ..
    1. +1
      21 August 2011 20: 16
      The elite quickly realized that the hungry people would lift her on a pitchfork! Like in ancient Rome the slogan "BREAD AND SIGHT", from here grow the legs of the Olympics in Sochi and stole the final with the Eurovision Song Contest. Where our people used to bang the screen like a football field !!! MAX. Colossal costs are spent on tricks !!! A country with the richest mineral resources will soon buy gasoline over the hill, our oligarchs do not have enough money !!! People are not allowed to die and their pension has been raised and, in principle, they are trying to show their achievements, but in fact ... .......... The collapse of the Army, the collapse of the health care system, the collapse of the social security system, the collapse of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the collapse of education .......... and you can list, enumerate, enumerate
  6. 0
    20 August 2011 13: 37
    The fact that even a schoolboy knows that anti-people’s power is all blamed and blamed on the USSR, but who will tell me whether there were so many poor, homeless, unemployed. Yes, indeed, anti-people’s power, and besides, it chooses itself and we can’t do anything yet . I think trying to vote in the elections ...
  7. +3
    20 August 2011 15: 48
    Of course, I understand that it’s true that we have grown to Portugal, but we didn’t rise from shit by heroic efforts by building factories (or, although restoring old ones), plowing up arable land, Opposing Russian science and its centers, no, again God really loves Our country, the world began to grow on raw materials, and not by 20-30% percent, but several times over several years for the products of ferrous and non-ferrous metallurgy, and the oil and gas sector, "Objected" by the way understanding that the valves can rip off the people and someone will have to answer for the dashing 90s , and VVP just like a hero appeared out of nowhere on the White Horse and saved the country ...
    And about studying abroad and property abroad, this is really such a criterion for assessing their loyalty and state thinking of the elite.
    It was just that before they understood the principle of action in our rush, if the cattle, God forbid, raise their heads, they are from a home-made house in Holstfrim bach and two hours later in London by a warm fireplace, with a Pakistani servant.
    K, too, would have thought that the Friedman model of the economy would collapse and start shaking everyone, both the USA and Britain, and even the same Pakistanis from servants suddenly started talking about Sharia in Westham ... but you won’t fly to the moon ... now they have a headache at night
    1. 0
      20 August 2011 17: 49
      If we have grown to Portugal, it means “we went to the root,” this is downward growth.
  8. zczczc
    0
    20 August 2011 17: 23
    "There is no other political elite anyway" - Alexander, remember how and by whom Stalin came to the Central Committee! He was his own for all of them, and what he did with them all - he returned everything, practically, as it was in tsarist Russia, only left the sign. And he is not "another elite", but only one person was. One did everything.

    Therefore, do not say that everyone needs to endure the theft of the current government.
  9. stalker
    0
    20 August 2011 19: 14
    Article Summary: Vote for EdRo)
  10. Max
    Max
    -1
    20 August 2011 23: 22
    Guys, read here what has been done over 10 years and draw your own conclusions. This source simply cites dry facts as you yourself know:

    http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD#.D0.AD.D0.BA.D0.BE.D
    0.BD.D0.BE.D0.BC.D0.B8.D1.87.D0.B5.D1.81.D0.BA.D0.BE.D0.B5_.D1.80.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0
    .B2.D0.B8.D1.82.D0.B8.D0.B5
    1. -4
      21 August 2011 10: 31
      After the tragedy, in an interview with the American television channel CNN, to Larry King’s question about what happened to the Kursk submarine, Putin, still smiling at the previous discussion, [101] answered: “She drowned,” but then Putin immediately stopped smiling and told in detail about the incident.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3rYYe1KSGY
      The KGB taught well how to behave during interrogations and not split. However, a smirk: "She drowned ..."

      And further. Reading Wikipedia, I remembered an old joke:
      Marya Ivanovna tells how well children live in the USSR, and Little Johnny sits and cries. She asks him: "Why are you crying, Little Johnny?"
      "I want to go to the Soviet Union!"
  11. +2
    21 August 2011 11: 19
    Dear professor, I will try to explain the situation with the interview ... I myself, initially, perceived Putin's words with indignation and "emotions", but then I realized what was what. In those days, just not being able to speak in different ways talked the question "What happened to the boat?" and, moreover, often this question was asked immediately after answering the same question, only asked with a different intonation. And, therefore, I think, VVP, in order to prevent the further "doping" of the interviewers, gave a deliberately cynical answer to the idiotic question in order to stop the stupid game of "question-answer", since in that situation, they still had to figure it out, before giving any explanations. And as for life in the USSR, you, apparently, at that time still "walked under the table" and cannot judge that reality sensibly, or you sing from the voice of "senior, wise comrades." Thanks to MAX for his thinking skills. I agree with you, buddy!
    1. -1
      22 August 2011 21: 05
      Dear esaul,
      Thank you for defending the GDPR, but let me stay with my opinion on the GDPR. His close-up grin at "she drowned" tells me a lot. It could be said otherwise and certainly not to grin.
      As for the USSR, I managed to sip the benefits of Soviet power. I visited both the pioneers and the Komsomol and, as they say, thanks to Comrade Brezhnev for our happy childhood. Childhood was actually happy, but rather thanks to the parents, and not to the "native party". Even at school, I realized that words in the USSR are at odds with deeds. He also visited the army (where I was taught to love the Motherland) and student construction brigades and even worked in production as a young distribution specialist. Therefore, I have a deep well-established opinion about what the USSR is. And I don't need to tell any fairy tales about him. I can compare what they achieved in the decaying West without Soviet power (I had to travel at work) and not everything is in favor of the advice.
      1. slan
        0
        22 August 2011 21: 18
        Professor, have you seen Bush Junior? In your opinion, is he a super-cynic? Yes, it’s just that all people from time to time take small, but inappropriate actions. Someone regularly like Bush, someone rarely.
        1. 0
          22 August 2011 23: 25
          I liked Bush wink . Simple, blunt and predictable. The main straight. The one who replaced him and received the Nobel Peace Prize (I do not remember why request ) Millions of times worse and more dangerous than Bush.
          1. slan
            0
            22 August 2011 23: 34
            Yes, ours was a man))
            Like a simple Ryazan shirt-guy .. to blame, an ordinary girl from Texas (s))) of course.
  12. -5
    21 August 2011 12: 48
    As for the boat, he could answer so that this question is to the US Department of Defense ....
  13. -1
    21 August 2011 14: 19
    Essentially ... an article ... "Peaceful determination" is what is required both for each individual and for the people ...
  14. enikey
    -1
    21 August 2011 15: 32
    I agree with the article, I think almost the same way, the revolution is not needed for sure, if it happens, then the Jews will not miss their own!
    esaul, I agree to the account of Putin’s response, he gave it to the American public, said what they wanted to hear. But the fact that the guys were left to die there, for this I think the perpetrators should be brought to justice!
  15. Mclout 007
    -1
    21 August 2011 19: 11
    Good words - Only with Russia is it an elite. Remains without rocking the boat, wait for the arrival of the Sovereign or the arrival of the sovereign man
  16. remserves
    -1
    22 August 2011 01: 46
    In general, do we have an elite? What is is a parody of her. Just high-ranking bigwigs, and by the way, S-Shchedrin described all this in "The History of a City". EVERYTHING WAS
  17. dragoni4657
    -1
    22 August 2011 03: 17
    Search to watch anime, fiction, etti or comedy? Someone watched anime http://animemovie.ru Immense heaven / IS: Infinite Stratos
  18. lokdok
    +1
    22 August 2011 08: 38
    Yeah ... I read the forum - all in anticipation of trouble, everyone lives badly. Well, let's remember what happened 10 years ago:
    Airplanes did not fly in the army, ships did not sail — there was no fuel, plus — a lost war in Chechnya, had just defaulted — the country was on the verge of collapse. Oil revenues go past the budget (because production sharing agreement).
    Now: The army has full training, constant exercises, strategists fly, ships at sea. Chechnya is reassured. Big stars reserves. Oil revenues - go to the BUDGET of Russia (This is not the price of oil has risen - this is the income from it went to us, which means we began to influence the price of oil), and not to different shells and bp.
    Посмотрите: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%83%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD#.D0.AD.D0.BA.D0.BE.D

    0.BD.D0.BE.D0.BC.D0.B8.D1.87.D0.B5.D1.81.D0.BA.D0.BE.D0.B5_.D1.80.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0

    .B2.D0.B8.D1.82.D0.B8.D0.B5 maybe little has been done, maybe Stalin could have done more, but nobody here wants his methods.
    1. dmb
      -1
      22 August 2011 11: 09
      I would not like to swear, but such judgments are reminiscent of an old Soviet anecdote about hanging. "And bring your rope, or will the trade union allocate it?" I really don't want a revolution, but this is an objective law. So it is better to let her be with us than our grandchildren will get.
  19. Fray
    0
    22 August 2011 17: 34
    Article should be called "On the nature of the Russian government"
  20. Patriot
    0
    22 August 2011 18: 44
    lokdok
    Beautifully written my friend, lokdok.

    But it doesn’t seem to you that if it weren’t for the price of oil of $ 110-120, then a penny would be all plans for the army, social welfare, etc. But you try to imagine what respected liberals can do in a situation if the price of oil is $ 35-45, as in 2008-2009, or, even better, 18-20, as when transferring power from the ebn to the gdp?
    So think about what all their achievements are worth. The only merit of the gdp (although, of course, this is not his merit) is that when oil is not expensive. And the funny thing is that at the moment, a country that is not able to feed itself, drink, vow, shoe, protect, it is not clear what it is spending temporary excess profits from selling expensive oil. Instead of building factories and factories and developing the defense industry and the army, the liberals invest in the economy of a potential enemy and put budget money into the wind - development of the North Caucasus, Skolkovo, Chubais nanotechnology, 2018 World Cup, Sochi Olympics.
    Here is dad Lukashenko, this is a man. It is practically independent of the rest of the world. And, it needs Russia, the EU or someone else no more than they are in it. And, at least, he did not and never will have problems with food and essential goods.
  21. Patriot
    +1
    22 August 2011 18: 44
    By the way, about the beautiful program Development of the North Caucasus in the amount of several trillion rubles ... I myself come from the Caucasus, and I know a little what's what. In the Caucasus, there are calm nations, and there are frostbitten ones. I can’t say anything about everyone, but I have in mind just about the majority. Well, there are two frostbitten Caucasian nations-Chechens and Ingush. The events of recent years, when Russian guys died under shelling and in terrorist acts precisely at the hands of representatives of these two Vainak nations, TOMU CONFIRMATION. These nations can mainly live at the expense of others to steal and kill.
    The guys from Dagestan, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia, Ossetians are quite sane, some of them can and do want to work, but they just don’t give them. For, unemployment in the North Caucasus is simply terrifying.
    The same president of Chechnya Kadyrov, now with very good cash flows from Moscow. He and the Medveputin guys are actively cutting budget funds. HERE try to tear it from this money. Yes, he will immediately take up arms and take up his usual Chechen affair - KILL. What he basically did. For the sake of truth, it’s worth noting that he is transforming Chechnya well. But, in addition to Chechnya, there is the rest of the Caucasus, which will never get the money. By the way, no one noticed that in recent years all terrorist attacks, gangs and all the trash have literally bypassed Chechnya. The question is what would it be? Yes, I think that he simply agreed with them, for he is trying to show Moscow that its billions did not go to waste, and that thanks to them he established peace and tranquility in Chechnya.

    So dear lokdok, you have listed so beautifully, all these are trifles that a self-respecting country should allow itself.
  22. kesa1111
    +6
    12 October 2011 18: 25
    Countries capture to export:
    capital, minerals, brains, skilled labor, beautiful women, just hardworking youth. Can shock the Kremlin Judas and Lubyanka bandits? Isn't it time to restore the tower for treason and corruption?
  23. Motherland
    -3
    12 October 2011 18: 43
    A situation has developed that if we displace the government, then the country will again crush and fill the chaos and the bandits will easily fall again, if we leave everything as it is, they will finally deflate and dump it. So it seemed that there is nowhere to go, so we do not see on the streets of thousands of people outraged by this theft of people, most of us scored, "Let it be so" - and sitting on the couch in the evening on the news they scold the authorities, someone writes on the Internet, etc. But if people come out, they will simply send OMON, our government I learned how to suppress such things, not the West, they will beat you with truncheons to a pulp and that's it. So either we do everything smartly or we wait until they are finally plundered.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"