Assad refuses to surrender the country, and the West calls on him to resign

20
Assad refuses to surrender the country, and the West calls on him to resign
Syrian leader Bashar Assad is respectful of his behavior, he refused to capitulate on special conditions. The British newspaper The Times acknowledged the fact that Madrid was conducting secret mediation talks with Damascus on this subject. Moreover, according to Syrian sources, Syrian President Bashar Assad was promised in exchange for a concession to the supreme power and the transfer to the opposition "democratic government", "comfortable old age", "mansion by the sea" and "personal pension". But Assad did not succumb to the entreaties of the "burzhuinov" and their "barrels of jam."

According to British journalists, this proposal was conveyed to the leader of Syria in July by a “high-ranking diplomat,” a close assistant of the Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, Bernadino Leon. But to the data of British journalists: "Assad did not even respond to the diplomatic proposal."

Other Syrian news

17avgusta a telephone conversation took place between Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, during which the Syrian leader announced the cessation of all hostilities to suppress anti-government protests. This statement was made in response to the call of the UN Secretary General to immediately stop "all military operations and mass arrests." 18 August this news was supplemented by the message that the Syrian state will visit the United Nations humanitarian mission. Its purpose will be to monitor those regions and cities where military operations were conducted to suppress anti-government protests. According to the head of the UN Humanitarian Affairs Committee, Valerie Amos, representatives of the humanitarian delegation received guarantees from Damascus that they would have open access to any country of interest to it. According to Amos, the participants of the humanitarian mission will pay special attention to those cities from which information was received about the most severe dispersal of demonstrators by the law enforcement forces. Approval of this mission was obtained from Syria during the communication of Assad and Ban Ki-moon.

This is happening against the background of increasing pressure from the side of the so-called. "World community" (handful of countries that have the audacity to make statements on behalf of all countries of the planet). So, in the evening of August 18, Washington, London, Paris and Berlin called on the head of Syria to resign. And US President Barack Obama also reported on the arrest of all the assets of the Syrian authorities, which are located in the United States of America, and imposed a ban on the import of oil and oil products from the Syrian state. The US ban touched five Syrian oil companies: General Petroleum Corporation, Syrian Company for Oil Transport, Syrian Gas Company, Syrian Petroleum Company and Sytrol, all of which are state owned. Ankara, in response to the military operation in Latakia, made another sharp statement: the Turkish Foreign Ministry reported that if the Syrian government does not immediately stop the brutal suppression of the opposition forces, Turkey reserves the right to retaliate. True, what could be these measures, they did not specify.

The last military operation that Damascus conducted was the “cleansing” of Latakia. The city was blocked from the sea, the Syrian Navy even opened fire, armored vehicles entered the city. The operation was completed on August 17, on the same day the “events” in Deir ez-Zor were completed. According to Syrian authorities, the purpose of the operations was the destruction of "armed gangs" that "terrorized the local population." In Latakia, the gangsters managed to knock out from the Al-Ramel area al-Janubi, then the Syrian security forces began to pursue the remaining members of the group. In Deir-ez-Zor, according to the authorities, all the attackers were eliminated. Citizens of both cities expressed gratitude to their authorities for restoring order. What is interesting is the militants use tactics of bruising the authorities and the population: they strike the police, government agencies, troops, then hide in residential areas, of course, when the authorities react, sending troops, the uncomplicated can suffer. Thus, they increase the discontent of the population, cause international resonance.

Syria Round Table

On August 16, a roundtable was held at RIA Novosti on events in Syria. Among its participants were Russian and Syrian experts. According to the Syrian expert Ali Salim, the main, destructive role in the events was played by the forces of the West, their goal is to destroy the Syrian statehood, thus striking a blow at Iran. In Syria, Western intelligence agencies are trying to repeat the Libyan scenario, create a bridgehead such as Benghazi, from which it will be possible to conduct an offensive against Damascus. Already relying on this bridgehead and the “manual” rebel “government”, the “national salvation committee” (and it was actually created at the conference in Turkey), NATO will be able to intervene.

But the Syrian leadership was able to quickly respond and attempts to create such a bridgehead in several cities were thwarted. Similar uprisings were inspired in Dera'a, Homs, Hama, Der-ez-Zur, Latakia, and a number of other raions. The most difficult situation was in the old nest of Islamism - Hama. The Syrian authorities lost control of the city for almost a month. Only in early August, the Syrian troops were able to restore order there, although the events in Hama caused a great response, providing a good excuse for further demonizing the regime of Bashar al-Assad.

Although the events in the same Latakia show that the wailing of the Western media about the “peaceful demonstrators” is a lie during the ongoing information war against Syria. So, on 16 August, Syrian anti-terror forces lost in street fights in Latakia only by killed 17 special forces. Most of them were killed as a result of sniper fire, which led the "civilians". In the same Latakia, the West tried again to rely on the Islamists, according to eyewitnesses, the areas of Scantor and Remel Falistin were declared an Islamic emirate, Sharia laws were introduced there, and the emir was chosen with the Vizier. But the West does not see this point-blank, and requires a dialogue with the "democratic opposition."

Yes, and the opposition does not notice the concessions of the authorities: the official Damascus took serious measures, canceling the state of emergency that had been in force for several decades (48 years), introducing a multi-party system. And it would be foolish to legalize the radical organization “Muslim Brotherhood”. This is a force that is supported in the West, whose headquarters is located in London, which has carried out a series of terrorist acts in Syria, and attacks on officials and officers.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    20 August 2011 14: 53
    The further development of the story with Syria is interesting. It is clear that Assad will not make significant concessions, having before his eyes such a magnificent example of NATO's helplessness in Libya, especially since the Syrian army is far superior to the Libyan army in terms of saturation with modern types of weapons, including heavy ones. We should also not forget about Russia, which actually ignored the "proposals" of the West to stop supplying weapons to Syria.
  2. 0
    20 August 2011 16: 04
    But nobody already trusts the guarantees of the West, the Hague tribunal right now, how the Shemyakin court works, nevertheless, Ased well done there really are a lot of contradictions in the country, without a strong hand it is impossible there otherwise the countries will fall apart as a result of the civil war, I won’t judge , but from the people who worked there as military experts.
    And according to the scenario, until they get there, they will count on the fifth column (sometimes it’s cheaper to cost than the cost of air bombs, and guided missiles.)
    I would like the Syrian people to be able to avoid further adversity.
  3. Garfield
    +1
    20 August 2011 16: 59
    Very interesting forecast for Syria http://hvylya.org/analytics/geopolitics/12586-sirija-stsenarii-razvjazki-krizisa
    -na-blizhnem-vostoke.html
  4. Marat
    +3
    20 August 2011 17: 51
    The Syrian leadership acts for the good of the people, and most of the people understand this - since they suppressed all these bandits fed by the West - Muslim brothers, etc. - it means that the army and most of the people support the legitimate leadership of the country. Everyone understands that if you surrender the country and "democratize" then chaos and bloodshed will ensue on a larger scale than now

    Assad cannot give up and negotiate with the West - they will again deceive as with Serbia - they promise not to touch him - and then they will "sue" and hang him in a cell at night. Assad understands this.

    The position of Russia is encouraging - this time it is quite clear and clear statements on TV by Putin and even iPhone correctly said. It is good that there is now Iran - the only country in the region in the absence of the USSR that confronts the aggressors in reality and is ready to fight for the Syrian allies. At the first opportunity, it is necessary to bargain with "our Western masters" for some kind of permission - relaxation and rearmament of the Iranian and Syrian armies. First of all, they need reconnaissance communications and long-range precision weapons. The Iranians need to supply long-range anti-ship missile systems to control the Persian Gulf, as their own designs give me doubts in terms of reliability and efficiency. Both countries urgently need to update their air defense - also the presence of Russian instructors. Moreover, this is not free aid as in the USSR - Iran will be ready to pay - and with Syria on the edge it is possible to offset settlements for the naval base - which must be mastered - is another deterrent against aggressive countries
    1. ballian
      -4
      20 August 2011 18: 13
      Quote: Marat
      once suppressed all these bandits fed by the West - Muslim brothers, etc. - then the army and most of the people support the country's legal leadership

      You are somehow ignorant - for half a year now, Syrians have been mass protests against Assad - and you still have not suppressed anything.
    2. -5
      20 August 2011 19: 01
      Syrian leadership acts for the good of the people

      For the benefit of what people? Alawite or Sunni? Maybe Druze? The leadership of Syria and its army are Alawites, which many do not even consider Muslims. The majority of the population (people) are Sunni Arabs who will cut out all Alawites as soon as possible.

      I personally "liked" the position of the Palestinians. These jo..oliz felt the weakness of the Assad regime and openly opposed it, despite 6 months of reprisals. Looks like it's coming to an end.
    3. cVM
      cVM
      -2
      21 August 2011 13: 07
      The Syrian leadership acts for the good of the people and most understand this


      What good? His family spent 40 years, the Syrians hate Assad, and everyone knows that.
      Imagine Putin has ruled us for 40 years and we get up we want a revolution and he wins and someone in Armenia says Putin well done, is that right?

      Iran will never fight for others, it’s even unable to defend itself, but what they say from Tehran is nonsense, it has a bad economy, + theocracy (dictatorship) will take into account the same when Iran waits.
    4. Ivan35
      +1
      24 August 2011 18: 04
      I will support Marat! Do not pay attention to the comments of the sub-belligerents - they are trying to prove that Assad is not good for Syria - my position is simple - it is beneficial to Russia and its interests and it is an enemy of our enemies with Iran!
      It would be nice if pendos would have our influence agents acting on similar sites - just like they are commenting on us with might and main!
  5. 0
    20 August 2011 18: 27
    Our Foreign Ministry supported Syria: Representatives of the Russian Foreign Ministry say that the country's position differs from Europe and the United States. “We do not support such appeals, and we believe that right now we need to give time to the regime of President Al-Assad in order to implement all the reform processes that have been announced.”
    http://www.km.ru/v-mire/2011/08/20/narodnye-volneniya-v-stranakh-arabskogo-mira/
    rossiya-ne-somnevaetsya-v-legitimnost
  6. cVM
    cVM
    +1
    21 August 2011 13: 10
    God, what stupid people we have, I’ll regret it straight, and then we scold our diplomats what they can do to them
    1. +3
      22 August 2011 11: 02
      You have more stupid people in America.
      Respect the opinions of others. Although you have such a job, I understand.
      1. Ivan35
        +1
        24 August 2011 18: 00
        Of course, this is his job! Clearly part of the pendos propaganda machine!
  7. Garfield
    0
    22 August 2011 10: 47
    Is Syria planning to buy Bastions, or at least Ball-E?
    Who can throw off information about the presence of modern Russian weapons in Syria at this time? I heard purchased 36 pieces "PantsirS1", "Pechora2m" ...
    1. Superduck
      0
      22 August 2011 19: 21
      Well, in 2003 or 2004, Russia canceled the deliveries of even the Needle, I think that the Pantsiri were all the more blocked by friends. There, only the Torah seems to be decent. Of course, there are a lot of tanks like any other Arabs, but tanks are, as it were, just a good target for NATO.
  8. Fray
    +1
    22 August 2011 17: 41
    Quote: cVM

    What good? His family spent 40 years, the Syrians hate Assad, and everyone knows that.
    Imagine Putin has ruled us for 40 years and we get up we want a revolution and he wins and someone in Armenia says Putin well done, is that right?

    Iran will never fight for others, it’s even unable to defend itself, but what they say from Tehran is nonsense, it has a bad economy, + theocracy (dictatorship) will take into account the same when Iran waits.


    And in your USA, UNDER THE POWER OF JEWISH BANKERS, it's just heaven on earth,
    where whole cities go bad (Detroit example)
    1. cVM
      cVM
      -2
      22 August 2011 22: 25
      do you think that the usa is ruled by Jews?))) Yes, Jews live here and they have a strong lobby and they work together to take off, but they also vote in support of Israel. If there comes a real national interest, they will not support Israel, name at least 1 banker of Jewish origin and don’t write stupid things
      1. Superduck
        +1
        23 August 2011 10: 08
        Quote: cVM
        name at least 1 banker of Jewish origin

        Rothschild, it is quite possible to say a famous banker.
        1. cVM
          cVM
          -1
          23 August 2011 17: 33
          I ask at the moment, not about the 19th century
          1. Superduck
            +1
            23 August 2011 17: 58
            Well then, Soros, although he is not a banker. Well, in short, I’m not ready to argue with you on this subject and do not want to. You asked to name an American banker - a Jew - I called, if you need modern ones, I think there are about a dozen, but I’m frankly engaged in googling this issue, there’s no time. Sorry. I am not a supporter of the idea of ​​a Jewish conspiracy at all.
  9. matolyan
    0
    23 August 2011 06: 30
    The United States is heading towards sunset; Libya and Syria are already a powerless step of despair. Pindos is now the time to think about self-preservation, and not try to satisfy their exorbitantly high ambitions.