Military Review

Russia will supply the Syrian army with weapons to fight the Islamic State

123
If the so-called Western coalition considers it possible to strike at the militants of the Islamic State group and help the “moderate Syrian opposition” weapons, then why should Russia not help Damascus in fighting the IS? Approximately such a question is asked by the president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems of the Russian Federation Konstantin Sivkov. He is quoted RIA News:

Russia should provide the maximum possible assistance, I emphasize, the maximum possible assistance to the Syrian state so that it can withstand and destroy the IS. There are people there who are ready to fight for their country, and they need weapons.


Konstantin Sivkov notes that, first of all, Syrians who want to protect their country from radicals need to be helped with modern and effective weapons. Such a weapon will allow you to better equip the Syrian army.

Recall that just a few days ago, the head of the Syrian Foreign Ministry, Walid Muallem, said that Russia could supply the Syrian army with the C-300 complexes, whose supplies were suspended for several reasons.

Russia will supply the Syrian army with weapons to fight the Islamic State


According to the Syrian authorities, the militants of the IS appeared aviation, and this means that the Russian S-300 will definitely be in demand. At the same time, the Syrian authorities reminded that the West called on Russia to act as a united front against the “Islamic state”, and today Russia stands for such a front with its deliveries of air defense systems. Noble trolling of western partners!
123 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Phantom Revolution
    Phantom Revolution 11 November 2014 19: 55
    +25
    Rather, what is needed for a long time there.
    1. Denis fj
      Denis fj 11 November 2014 20: 43
      +42
      let's not argue further, but agree that Syria needs both modern tanks, and the recently widely advertised BMPT terminator, and jet flamethrowers (oh, what a fun life began for Islamic State militants if Buratino worked on them) and modern small arms , anti-sniper radars, drones and the list is endless.
      1. Kent0001
        Kent0001 11 November 2014 20: 54
        +35
        By the way, it will be possible to break in new items in real hostilities. Such an experience is invaluable.
        1. P. Yaroslav
          P. Yaroslav 11 November 2014 23: 44
          +10
          I agree with you. This will help to supply our army with weapons already developed on the basis of the experience of Syria. Especially if our specialists themselves can be present during the combat use of equipment.
          1. Akuzenka
            Akuzenka 13 November 2014 22: 55
            0
            Colleagues, do you think this is not being done? Back in 2001, a helicopter was shot down by a local peasant in Iraq from a Berdanka. Question: what is the actual name of this "berdanka"? and there is no need to talk about tanks, everyone remembers how mattress mats yelled at the whole world.
      2. Revolver
        Revolver 11 November 2014 21: 23
        -26
        Quote: denis fj
        but we agree that Syria also needs modern tanks
        Rather simpler, cheaper, and most importantly more. Maybe even junk like T-54 from warehouses to raise - in Syria, they will be more useful than the delivery of scrap metal. And with the T-90, and even the latest modifications of the T-72, the Arabs will not at once cope.
        Quote: denis fj
        advertised bmpt terminator
        A couple of pieces, purely for testing. And they’re unlikely to get more sensible crews.

        But the S-300 and Yakhons are not needed. Hedgehog it is clear that Assad is asking them not against the Islamists, but against Israel. We can even mean to transfer to the Hezbalons, and through those to Iran. And if anyone thinks that Israel will not react to this, and not only and not so much in words, turn on your brains.
        1. Dreamwriter
          Dreamwriter 11 November 2014 22: 14
          +16
          Yakhonts already delivered Assad. I don’t see any problems because of the reaction of Israel. So it is necessary - and more yachts, and S-300. T-72 is also possible - given that it is their Syrians who mainly use it. No need to invent - just the same, the Syrians, in comparison with the rest of the Arabs, have the most sensible crews (for, as the USSR wrote before, the USSR trained Syrian specialists)
          1. Revolver
            Revolver 11 November 2014 23: 18
            +13
            Quote: Dreamscripter
            Yakhonts already delivered Assad.
            The Jews have already successfully bombed the place of their storage, in my opinion, last year, although I could be mistaken. Moreover, the Syrians did not even understand where they came from, whether from the air, or from the sea, and the Jews, as always, meaningfully "do not confirm or deny."

            Quote: Dreamscripter
            T-72 is also possible - given that it is their Syrians who mainly use it.
            T-72 they are different. Syrians are unlikely to cope with B3, and models are older and simpler, such as what they already use, are quite suitable. Against Allahakbar, high technology is not required, which will come easier, if only more. That's what is important - that there was air conditioning, in that climate it is not a luxury but a means of survival.
            1. Dreamwriter
              Dreamwriter 12 November 2014 02: 06
              +8
              The Jews have already successfully bombed the place of their storage, in my opinion, last year, although I could be mistaken. Moreover, the Syrians did not even understand where they came from, whether from the air, or from the sea, and the Jews, as always, meaningfully "do not confirm or deny."

              Bullshit. Bastions-P with full ammunition both stood on Assad’s armament and still stand. If the Syrians did not have the Yakhonts, the Jews would not have needed to invent Barak-8.
              T-72 they are different. Syrians are unlikely to cope with B3, and models are older and simpler, such as what they already use, are quite suitable. Against Allahakbar, high technology is not required, which will come easier, if only more. That's what is important - that there was air conditioning, in that climate it is not a luxury but a means of survival.

              Cope, cope. I understand that you do not like Arabs, but you do not need to make them unfounded as idiots - especially since the Arabs are different, and some Saudis, Iraqis, Kuwaitis and Syrians are very different. We just created the T-72B3 in case of mass mobilization (the T-14 Armata is going for the professional army in the Russian Federation) - and for this reason the T-72B3 control systems are made as simple as possible to master, for crews of reserve tankers.
        2. tol100v
          tol100v 11 November 2014 22: 41
          -3
          Quote: Nagan
          turn on your brains.

          You are the smartest person! It’s IMPOSSIBLE to give anyone and NOTHING!
        3. Vasek
          Vasek 12 November 2014 00: 28
          +10
          Quote: Nagan
          And they’re unlikely to get more sensible crews.

          I think, by now, the Syrian crews are the most experienced and combat-ready of all the crews of the Arabs.
        4. RobinBaD
          RobinBaD 12 November 2014 11: 05
          +1
          Just a dude lives in Israel and is quietly paranoid)
        5. Odyssey
          Odyssey 13 November 2014 11: 42
          0
          Syrians are good tankers! And the t-72 they have long been in service with. And they use junk well))), even in the conditions of the city! watch the video on YouTube.
      3. Starley from the south
        Starley from the south 14 November 2014 19: 14
        0
        Perhaps the Syrian army still needs the S-300 more, suddenly our gay-European and overseas "partners" will "accidentally" inflict airstrikes on the positions of the Syrian troops. Then the Syrians, also by accident, will shoot down a couple of planes, like who will take them apart, these planes - whether American or ISIS.
    2. Giant thought
      Giant thought 11 November 2014 20: 54
      +1
      Our assistance to Syria with modern weapons, of course, will allow the Syrian army to more convincingly fight the enemy, but provided that the personnel are trained to use these new weapons.
      1. DPN
        DPN 11 November 2014 21: 59
        +9
        Quote: Thought Giant
        provided that the personnel are trained to use these new weapons.

        The General Staff of Russia probably knows how many Syrians are studying in Russia, so in any case, the S-300 will not get fools. Yes, and for a long time it’s a miraculous weapon in business to check, you look and others WILL buy.
        1. muhomor
          muhomor 11 November 2014 22: 45
          +3
          And on whom will the s-300 be checked in business?
          1. brainkiller
            brainkiller 12 November 2014 15: 32
            +3
            I have not seen a more severe trolling of Americans for a long time. Those who gave ISIS a plane now scratch stupid turnips, such a gorgeous and absolutely normal reason for the delivery of lethal air defense equipment to Syria is just a gift.
      2. Aaron Zawi
        Aaron Zawi 11 November 2014 23: 08
        +1
        Quote: Giant thought
        Our assistance to Syria with modern weapons, of course, will allow the Syrian army to more convincingly fight the enemy, but provided that the personnel are trained to use these new weapons.

        And for what amount of the Russian Federation is going to give Syria weapons? If this figure is announced, it can be assumed that it will be included in the gift.
        1. nerd.su
          nerd.su 12 November 2014 01: 46
          +4
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          it can be assumed that it will be a gift.

          Yes, scrap is not a pity. The tanks that have been stored in storage in recent years, shells that we cannot dispose of in any way, even old AKs, they say, are going to be disposed of. We’ll save on utilization, transportation - training for the crews of the BDK, money is already not so pitiful.
        2. Oroch
          Oroch 12 November 2014 12: 34
          +1
          And here are the gifts. This is geopolitics, and all this says. Stop trolling cheaply.
    3. theadenter
      theadenter 11 November 2014 23: 28
      +5
      The most interesting thing is that ISIS has almost no aviation, and the S-300 means you know yourself against whom. laughing
    4. GSH-18
      GSH-18 12 November 2014 01: 15
      +2
      Pancake. But when will these S-300s be delivered ??? How much can you pull this rubber? Now, nothing prevents it from doing this!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  2. meriem1
    meriem1 11 November 2014 19: 56
    +32
    FINE!!!! That's right. Let them rage. Now let's see how they will fly without agreeing with the Syrian government. wink
    1. MREDBEST
      MREDBEST 11 November 2014 20: 49
      +3
      Now I think the American aircraft in Syria, without the permission of the Syrian authorities, will hardly dare to bomb their "former friends" from ISIS)))
    2. rostov-dad
      rostov-dad 11 November 2014 21: 10
      +7
      and there will be a no-fly zone for the militants of the American state
    3. just exp
      just exp 11 November 2014 21: 26
      +5
      We only hope that the Syrians are craving for whatever plane, so that with full support after this the UN and the NATO would start bombing all of Syria, sadly, Syria will not be able to repel the attack even with the S-300.
      all the more so since while (only for now) the states are bombing Assad’s opponents, and Assad can do it, the only bad thing is that while everyone gets used to bombing by the states of Syria, or rather the territory where ISIS reigns, then these bombardments of Assad will not cause any resonance.
  3. MIKHALYCH1
    MIKHALYCH1 11 November 2014 19: 56
    +21
    It would be better "Buratino" ... a game with our calculations ...
    1. Mol
      Mol 11 November 2014 20: 07
      +22
      Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
      It would be better "Buratino" ... a game with our calculations ...

      The Syrians, it seems, have enough of their smart fighters. And tankers are skilled. I am sure that, after appropriate preparation, they themselves will cope with the technique.
      1. hrych
        hrych 11 November 2014 20: 44
        +1
        No matter how funny it sounds, but Syria, although not one of the largest countries, is in fourth place in terms of the number of tanks in .... The world has more than 4,5 thousand tanks, second only to world monsters like Russia (more than 18 thousand .), Staff Pin..stan (more than 9 thousand) and China (8,5 thousand). In general, if you were to add to this number of skilled tankers, then the Syrian opposition and other ISIS would be rolled into the ground without much straining, and along the way, TelAviv would be.
        1. Egor65g
          Egor65g 11 November 2014 21: 45
          +18
          Here are those on smile Let the fans of Islam deal. Why climb into Tel Aviv.
          1. hrych
            hrych 11 November 2014 21: 53
            +3
            Hypothetically, by the way, Israel with more than 3 thousand tanks, in terms of number, is among the ten lucky owners of these devices.
            1. Aaron Zawi
              Aaron Zawi 11 November 2014 23: 10
              +4
              Quote: hrych
              Hypothetically, by the way, Israel with more than 3 thousand tanks, in terms of number, is among the ten lucky owners of these devices.

              Israel plans to leave no more than 2020 thousand vehicles in service and reserve by 2.
            2. RobinBaD
              RobinBaD 12 November 2014 11: 13
              +1
              Israel still has the Iron Dome - do not forget about it
          2. aleks 62
            aleks 62 12 November 2014 11: 03
            0
            .... And he’s Yegor’s sorted out ..... You just wouldn’t interfere with it ..... And everything would be used to believe .... wink
            1. Egor65g
              Egor65g 12 November 2014 14: 23
              +2
              And here we are ??? It seems that TA does not notice radical Islam wink
        2. RobinBaD
          RobinBaD 12 November 2014 11: 11
          +1
          You tell your tales dill there
      2. Revolver
        Revolver 11 November 2014 21: 08
        +3
        Quote: mol
        The Syrians, it seems, have enough of their smart fighters.
        And in 1948, and in 1967, and in 1973 kage was enough. And you go, every time you raked at the most do not spoil. Arabs - they are such Arabs ...
        Quote: mol
        I am sure that, after appropriate preparation, they themselves will cope with the technique.
        Arabs are Arabs, no matter how you prepare them - all for nothing. No wonder ISIS has the main striking forces - Chechens, Afghans, and who else, but not Arabs. However, since the vast majority of ISIS militants are Arabs, Assad has a chance against them.
        1. The Art of War
          The Art of War 11 November 2014 21: 16
          +12
          Nagan, do not forget that half of the militants in ISIS are the former military armies of Saddam Hussein, among others some were in the famous Guantanamo prison, so ISIS is a CIA project
          1. just exp
            just exp 11 November 2014 21: 28
            +7
            I think for a long time that all the states’s swords with the war with ISIS is just a dig under Assad, no terra are scampering over the states, because they are governed by the states.
        2. The fat man
          The fat man 11 November 2014 23: 23
          -4
          And in 1948, and in 1967, and in 1973 kage was enough. And you go, every time you raked at the most do not spoil. Arabs - they are such Arabs.

          Again the same story Arabs are not warriors, etc., etc.

          But is the existence of these countries on the world map not enough to refute this theory.?
          or do you think that they were not included in the plans of great Israel?
          Lish, thanks to the great sacrifices made by the Arabs and Soviet weapons, we can read the name of these states on the world map.
          what other proof is needed to refute the militancy of the Arabs?
          1. Revolver
            Revolver 12 November 2014 02: 38
            0
            Quote: Fat Man
            Again the same story
            Quote: Fat Man
            plans of great Israel

            You still remember the "blood of Christian babies" and cite the "protocols of the Elders of Zion" as proof.

            Quote: Fat Man
            disprove the militancy of the Arabs
            Militancy and competence are two completely different things. The Arabs will have enough belligerence for the whole ball and still will, but competence, including in military affairs, has not been there since at least the times when the Crusaders took Jerusalem. Even Saladin, whom they love to raise to the shield, was not an Arab, but a Kurd.
            1. The fat man
              The fat man 12 November 2014 09: 29
              0
              And what did you expect from the new states freed from colonialism?
              or.
              What competence did you expect from former peasants who did not know what a tractor is?
              Unlike the Jews, what kind of experience did the Arabs have? did they have, unlike the Jews, cadre officers?

              The problem with all Russian-speaking forums is that there are nowhere Russian-speaking Arabs who would set out their point of view on the conflict
              Because of this, we have a dominance of the Jewish point of view that does not meet resistance with the argument of the Russian-speaking Arabs
              1. Neksel
                Neksel 12 November 2014 13: 56
                +2
                Quote: Fat Man
                The problem with all Russian-speaking forums is that there are nowhere Russian-speaking Arabs who would set out their point of view on the conflict

                What are you ... There are also a lot of Russian-speaking Arabs in Israel. By the way - where did Mahmoud Abbas defend his doctorate in Holocaust denial? For many Arabs, preference is being given to engineers and doctors and nurses in countries of eastern Europe and mainly the former USSR, in most cases in Russia and Ukraine (it is cheaper there). From personal experience: a few months ago I visited a friend in the hospital (Shaarei Tsedek, who does not know, is a non-profit institution, and does not receive financial assistance from the state budget. Donations are the main financial base of the hospital).
                So two doctors come - one, as it turned out at the internship - talking among themselves in Arabic, one takes out a syringe and is going to do something. A friend naturally asked what they were going to do and to explain in Hebrew. One in very broken Hebrew began to explain that the second - the intern and Hebrew almost did not know, because just graduated in Ukraine. Naturally after that - everything was already perfectly explained in Russian.
          2. RobinBaD
            RobinBaD 12 November 2014 11: 16
            0
            no matter how trite and annoying it sounds - but it's the CIA bro. they themselves are already declaring this. supposedly the superiority of the nation of the United States and have the right type to intervene in other countries. already fear lost
    2. igor1981
      igor1981 11 November 2014 20: 13
      +7
      About "Burotino" - that's right, but without our calculations.
      1. hrych
        hrych 11 November 2014 20: 47
        +4
        Without our calculations, this is not "Buratino", but, unfortunately, "Papa Carlo's barrel organ".
        1. just exp
          just exp 11 November 2014 21: 29
          +2
          Syrians are also learning to fight, so they’ll put a lot of Islamists in a coffin.
          1. Egor65g
            Egor65g 11 November 2014 21: 47
            +12
            These — the more — the better.
      2. RobinBaD
        RobinBaD 12 November 2014 11: 20
        0
        everything in Syria is fine with the calculations. There are experienced warriors - where to give the heat prompt. Otherwise, Assad would have been merged long ago as Gaddafi. Assad man!
    3. Penzyac
      Penzyac 11 November 2014 20: 36
      +6
      Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
      It would be better "Buratino" ... a game with our calculations ...

      You can also "Tornado", only the calculations are better from the locals.
    4. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 11 November 2014 21: 13
      +4
      Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
      Better "Buratino"

      And according to the documents, issue it as a lemonade of the same name. The result is "Pinocchio" of dual use. And send the calculations on a business trip as bartenders. laughing
      1. Vasek
        Vasek 12 November 2014 00: 46
        0
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        The result is "Pinocchio" of dual use.

        And he is already dual-use.
        Originally intended for the destruction of chemical. weapons. (By the way, this is a great reason for the supply of "Buratino" to Syria, especially in light of the news about the seizure of warehouses and factories with chemical weapons by the Islamists).
        Well, along the way, a good tool for Ishilians to bake.
  4. Megatron
    Megatron 11 November 2014 19: 57
    +4
    Great, let them crush them like cockroaches!
    1. Tyumen
      Tyumen 11 November 2014 21: 12
      +3
      The bad thing is that all the evil from the planet flock to them in masses. It fills the ranks.
      1. P. Yaroslav
        P. Yaroslav 11 November 2014 23: 48
        +2
        It is against this evil spirits that need help. And in one place and cover them!
    2. RobinBaD
      RobinBaD 12 November 2014 11: 21
      0
      these militants must be neutered in public - so that the same ones are not born from them!
  5. Ural resident
    Ural resident 11 November 2014 19: 57
    +4
    while from our official announcement of the supply of c-300 was not. On the contrary, there were statements that the declared complexes for Syria would be disposed of. And Sivkov voiced his position, but not our leadership.
    1. SHILO
      SHILO 11 November 2014 20: 13
      +1
      Quote: A resident of the Urals
      while from our official announcement of the supply of c-300 was not. On the contrary, there were statements that the declared complexes for Syria would be disposed of. And Sivkov voiced his position, but not our leadership.


      A very, very sober look at this ambiguous statement! hi
    2. just exp
      just exp 11 November 2014 21: 32
      +3
      the problem is that Syria doesn’t need S-300s, they won’t help the Syrians in any way, because only Russia can protect them from the Nata, and the S-300 will simply complicate the planning of the bombings, no more, only a full range of air defense and electronic warfare systems can repel the Nato’s raid , that is, not only the S-300, but also the S-350, BukM2, TorM2, armor, ZGRLS and AWACS are needed there. with it in large quantities.
      But what Assad really needs is a sun, a terminator, UAVs and acoustic means that allow tracking the position of a sniper.
  6. Ordinary stock
    Ordinary stock 11 November 2014 19: 59
    +9
    Artillery, attack aircraft, helicopters and technologies for their effective use are what Syria needs.
    1. KBR109
      KBR109 11 November 2014 21: 17
      +2
      I apologize for correcting - and the prepared calculations (crews). No way without it.
    2. RobinBaD
      RobinBaD 12 November 2014 11: 23
      0
      Aviation is yes. But rather, aircraft bombers. Artillery - so they try not to bomb their cities - so the militants demolish houses ....
  7. Leshka
    Leshka 11 November 2014 20: 02
    +1
    something from the land is desirable
  8. Megatron
    Megatron 11 November 2014 20: 03
    +6
    Meanwhile, ISIS begins to cast its currency - gold and silver dinars.

    ISIS fighters intend to introduce their own currency, reports "Lenta.ru" with reference to The Daily Mail.

    Kas reportedly extremists want to return the dinars that were used during the time of early Islam. As in the Middle Ages, coins will be minted in pure gold and silver.

    According to the publication, messages about the introduction of their currency by the militants appeared on the networks with reference to statements by religious leaders in mosques of Mosul and Ninewa. The dinars are expected to go into circulation in the next few weeks in ISIL-controlled territories in Syria and Iraq. The Islamists themselves have not yet confirmed this information.

    Currently, the dinar is the official currency in Algeria, Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya, Serbia, Tunisia and the Republic of Macedonia. There coins are minted from less noble metals.
    1. bekjan
      bekjan 11 November 2014 20: 31
      +2
      and how did the spiritual leaders of other countries react?
    2. Tyumen
      Tyumen 11 November 2014 21: 15
      +2
      Quote: Megatron
      which was used during the time of early Islam.

      And the workmanship is the same. Let's go back to the Middle Ages.
    3. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 11 November 2014 21: 17
      +4
      At one time, because of these dinars, Gaddafi was killed. Machiavelli, "Sovereign" - "Everything to his own, to the rest - the law." But even yesterday, when Gaddafi was gouged for that dinar, ISIS was their own for those on whose conscience the blood of Gaddafi, Hussein, Milosevic, and many others.
  9. Proud.
    Proud. 11 November 2014 20: 06
    +22
    Russia will supply weapons to the Syrian army to fight the Islamic State. That's right. But the "advertisement" (joke) of the Severe Russian Transformer
    1. RobinBaD
      RobinBaD 12 November 2014 11: 26
      +1
      Donbass would be like that)
  10. pvv113
    pvv113 11 November 2014 20: 09
    +9
    Syrians wishing to defend their country from radicals need help with modern and effective weapons

    A very fair decision good
  11. padded jacket
    padded jacket 11 November 2014 20: 10
    +10
    These servants of the United States, Israel and other carriers of democracy must be urgently stopped. It is advisable to forever ...
    Khujairah liberated from militants:
  12. cergey51046
    cergey51046 11 November 2014 20: 10
    +8
    Syria needs to be given the Sunshine.
    1. RobinBaD
      RobinBaD 12 November 2014 11: 26
      0
      the sun - the same Pinocchio if so
  13. stonks
    stonks 11 November 2014 20: 10
    +3
    IMHO: С300 Syria is not needed now.
    But to supply Syria (Assad) with weapons for the fight against IS is topical.
    As they say, he is a son of a bitch, but he is OUR son of a bitch.
    Assad is predictable and sane, in contrast to the reckless and fanatical "rebels" fed by the United States, the control over which the United States lost at the moment when IS got to its OWN financial resources.
    More IMHO: the lack of powerful air defense kept Assad from immediately unleashing a new war with Israel.
    1. Bogranz
      Bogranz 11 November 2014 20: 32
      +18
      The fact of the matter is that air defense systems are now very welcome for Assad: the bombing of ISIS formations is nothing more than an excuse to bypass "on legal grounds" the Russian objections to the use of NATO and US forces in Syria. First, they will bomb ISIS, and then they will easily move on to bombing the Syrian army. And the emergence of aircraft from ISIS is exactly the same "legal" way to bypass the sanctions on the supply of air defense systems for the Syrian army. And Assad now has no time for Israel: he would have to cope with his own people, and if he does, then even more so it will not be up to Israel: the country is in ruins and the economy is in shambles.
      1. just exp
        just exp 11 November 2014 21: 35
        +2
        + a lot, that’s also the opinion, but as soon as Nata starts bombing Assad’s positions, Russia will come up after the first blows and the states will have to explain now why the Assad tyrant’s regime is being bombed and why the states are bombing the ISIS Assad terrorist.
    2. Penzyac
      Penzyac 11 November 2014 20: 46
      +1
      Quote: stonks
      IMHO: С300 Syria is not needed now.
      But to supply Syria (Assad) with weapons for the fight against IS is topical.
      As they say, he is a son of a bitch, but he is OUR son of a bitch.
      Assad is predictable and sane, in contrast to the reckless and fanatical "rebels" fed by the United States, the control over which the United States lost at the moment when IS got to its OWN financial resources.
      More IMHO: the lack of powerful air defense kept Assad from immediately unleashing a new war with Israel.

      Mostly true. Just do not understand, where does Israel now? Is Syria before him now (even if you assume that you are right)?
      1. stonks
        stonks 11 November 2014 21: 00
        -2
        In general, the issue of C300 supply has already been decided between R and I.
        Despite this info, I do not think that something has changed.
        For Israel, this question is a matter of survival. His Air Force is his main conventional strike force and the main conventional factor holding back the war in this region.
      2. just exp
        just exp 11 November 2014 21: 36
        +2
        Israel several times raided Syria, with what about Assad's facilities.
        1. rostov-dad
          rostov-dad 11 November 2014 22: 49
          +1
          and not only to Syria, and to many other oil terminals, under the guise of attacks by militants, so that the shares of oil producing companies would be cheaply bought and speculated on exchanges.
    3. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 11 November 2014 21: 08
      +15
      Quote: stonks
      300 Syria is not needed now.

      Modern air defense systems are always needed, especially in Syria. Ours have found a "killer" excuse for their delivery. The YuSers thought they were the most cunning, deploying the Euro missile defense system, as if to protect the allies from the Iranian missile defense ... Now you have to try on the same stupid cap with bells on your head!
      Quote: stonks
      the absence of a powerful air defense kept Assad from immediately starting a new war with Israel.
      But this is fiction!
      The lack of a powerful, deeply layered air defense allowed Israel to strike with impunity on the ATS infrastructure, remember the 31.10.2013 attack. to the warehouses with our missiles for C-125 in the port of Latakia. C-300 would stand there, and it is not known how everything would end for the Jews.
      "Israel has repeatedly stated that ... it will destroy weapons that could threaten the security of the Jewish state. We are talking, in particular, about the Russian air defense systems S-300, which Russia, according to some sources, previously supplied to Syria." Http: // www.newsru.com/arch/world, so one should rather wait for new Israeli air raids than Syrian air raids on Israel.
      1. KBR109
        KBR109 11 November 2014 21: 26
        +3
        Bravo seigneur HAS CAA! I subscribe to your every word in this comment! No matter who barks, the air defense system is a purely defensive weapon!
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 12 November 2014 03: 42
          +1
          Quote: KBR109
          Bravo seigneur HAS CAA!

          You can just-Comrade ... soldier
  14. Gelos
    Gelos 11 November 2014 20: 12
    +2
    There was ... there was a movie called "Calling Fire on Ourselves." You, damn it, supply and supply weapons, but why the hell does this infa go to all sorts of shit- "Eham Moscow time", eh ??
  15. aleks700
    aleks700 11 November 2014 20: 17
    +4
    Here you go. And then you understand the disposal!
  16. TOR2
    TOR2 11 November 2014 20: 17
    +13
    The discussion is going on in MO. "Terminator" is needed, not needed. There are several copies in Syria and everything will be clear at once.
  17. awersa
    awersa 11 November 2014 20: 18
    +2
    amerikosy are going to go ... they’ll leave them, our c300 is like a splinter in the ass, but ours has long been to set up so that the barracks would not be tempted to bombard the Assad’s army and the infrastructure controlled by it, and advertising to our rackets would not be out of place ...
    1. Penzyac
      Penzyac 11 November 2014 20: 50
      +4
      Quote: awersa
      amerikosy on gov..o come out ...

      Yes, let them come. Prolonged diarrhea depletes strength ... Proven by life.
      1. dr.star75
        dr.star75 11 November 2014 21: 33
        +1
        And why not deliver? Just a year ago Assad is bad, we are good, but if we put him, they are bad too. Now we are much worse than Assad, even worse than igil. There is nowhere worse. What are we afraid of? Sanctions? so they’re already in full swing. Will they bomb? I doubt. And they would have put it a year ago, maybe in Ukraine it was calmer.
  18. Rokossovsky
    Rokossovsky 11 November 2014 20: 18
    +4
    I think ours are reinsured, and therefore do not supply modern, quite expensive weapons. I doubt that the Syrians have money for it, and few people want to lend, as it was during the Soviet era! We all know where these debts are now ... The situation in Syria is very unstable and it is not known what could happen even in the medium term! Assad will remain in power or Saudi suckers will throw him away ... There, they sent money to Svidomo at the end of last year, and now they are proposing to return from the past, overthrown government ... request
    IMHO
    PS Although I strongly wish the Syrian people patience and strength in the fight against Wahhabi evil spirits!
    1. TOR2
      TOR2 11 November 2014 20: 55
      +2
      Quote: Rokossovsky
      I think ours are reinsured, and therefore do not supply modern, quite expensive weapons

      test it too somewhere
  19. padded jacket
    padded jacket 11 November 2014 20: 19
    +5
    stonks US Today, 20:10 New
    More IMHO: the lack of powerful air defense kept Assad from immediately unleashing a new war with Israel.


    In other words, do you approve that Israel stabs in the back of Syria fighting terrorists?
    1. stonks
      stonks 11 November 2014 20: 38
      -3
      And he does?
      So far, as far as I know, Israel treats IS fighters for free. And hammering on the Syrian armed forces only if the VSS shells fly across the border. And there, at the border of the kibbutzim (collective farms) is full, people live.
      But now there appears a confusing tangle of relations, in which druses. And how Israel will continue to behave with regards to battles at its borders, I don’t understand ...
      1. padded jacket
        padded jacket 11 November 2014 21: 11
        +4
        You probably don’t quite know, Israel constantly strikes Syria taking advantage of the fact that it is fighting against bandits,
        weakened and cannot respond under these conditions.
        Russian Foreign Ministry Concerned by Israeli Air Force Strikes on Syria

        Israel struck Syria

    2. stonks
      stonks 11 November 2014 20: 40
      -6
      I clearly expressed my attitude to Assad in the comment you are quoting.
  20. Netwallker
    Netwallker 11 November 2014 20: 21
    -22
    S-300 complexes, the supply of which was suspended for a number of reasons.
    1. TOR2
      TOR2 11 November 2014 20: 53
      +2
      a rhetorical question ...
    2. Barsik
      Barsik 12 November 2014 01: 01
      0
      Netwallker you worry about Tel Aviv. Nehru poke his nose where the dog himself knows that did not pop.
      1. Egor65g
        Egor65g 12 November 2014 13: 35
        +1
        Why rude, dear smile
    3. Netwallker
      Netwallker 12 November 2014 13: 25
      +1
      Judging by the results of the vote, the people doubt that Israel will eliminate the "threat."
      But in vain the story shows very different facts.
  21. Mol
    Mol 11 November 2014 20: 21
    +11
    Russia will supply the Syrian army with weapons to fight the Islamic State

    Why such a loud title with the modest content of the article ?! I read it - I was immediately glad, I thought - well, finally, our leadership decided to openly and boldly act. But further reading diminished my joy.
    "If the so-called Western coalition considers it possible to strike at the militants of the IS group and help the “Syrian opposition,” why shouldn't Russia also arrange assistance to Damascus? Konstantin Sivkov, President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems of the Russian Federation, is asking this question. "
    Similar questions are asked by many people here at VO. But they cannot influence the situation. Sivkov can give the go-ahead for arms supplies to Syria ?!

    "Konstantin Sivkov notes that, first of all, the Syrians who want to defend their country from radicals need to help with modern and effective weapons. Such weapons will better equip the Syrian army."
    Any sane person understands this, even without being the president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems of the Russian Federation.

    "Recall that just a few days ago, the head of the Syrian Foreign Ministry Walid Muallem said that Russia will supply the Syrian army with S-300 complexes, the supply of which has been suspended for a number of reasons."
    This has already been written. Are there any comments by Russian leaders regarding these (or any other) deliveries of weapons to the Syrian state?
    It turns out that the article is about nothing, damn it! request
    1. petrovich08
      petrovich08 11 November 2014 22: 08
      +2
      I agree completely, the headline in the style of the yellow press.
    2. rostov-dad
      rostov-dad 11 November 2014 22: 57
      0
      and how many machine guns, armored vehicles, RPGs, and other good things can fit in an empty p-launcher of the s-300?
  22. Ze Kot
    Ze Kot 11 November 2014 20: 27
    +1
    Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
    It would be better "Buratino" ... a game with our calculations ...



    They have mostly urban battles. Whom are you going to use "Buratino" against?
    1. Penzyac
      Penzyac 11 November 2014 20: 56
      +1
      Quote: The Cat
      Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
      It would be better "Buratino" ... a game with our calculations ...



      They have mostly urban battles. Whom are you going to use "Buratino" against?

      Urban battles, mainly with the so-called opposition, and not only in cities are at war with the IS.
  23. Idel
    Idel 11 November 2014 20: 28
    +3
    Of course, weapons and not only air defense systems must be supplied to Syria. They are important, but more important weapons for ground units.
    Now about the main thing. Do we, as always, provide "brotherly" assistance or do we still get real money for it? Of course, there are a lot of geopolitical issues from which we can get a gesheft, but still interesting about the payment. Life has shown that the so-called. brothers, we are traditionally thrown at the first opportunity. It has always been this way, it has been so everywhere. Yes, the Syrians took the Islamist blow on themselves. It's good. It's good that our people don't die. Yes, we managed to draw them into this conflict, but I hope we are smart enough to distance ourselves from these problems.
    Our relations with Israel have more or less normalized, and here is the S-300. Is the game worth the candle? Or for our own money we get our own problems?
    1. stonks
      stonks 11 November 2014 20: 53
      +3
      I agree.
      A vivid example is the Americans who fed the Islamists in the hope of loyalty and gratitude. And this is EAST! Here universal norms do not work!

      US-Israel-Russia relations are a separate huge topic.
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 11 November 2014 21: 31
      +8
      Quote: Idel
      Our relations with Israel have more or less normalized, and then C-300

      Relations with Israel are good. But what happens if Syria falls. Where do you think the "champions of democracy" will send IS fighters, after Syria. Really to Israel !? -- No?
      We help Assad because this is our ally in the fight against radical Islam, which has a direct road to our southern borders. Assad will not stand, then our blood will already pour.
      And C-300 is for the Yankees, when Assad is combed to punish them, as previously happened with Libya, Iraq ...
      Now try to answer your own question about the price of the "sheepskin"! IMHO.
      1. Egor65g
        Egor65g 11 November 2014 21: 57
        -5
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        ally in the fight against radical Islam

        Israel has been fighting radical Islam for decades. That would be with whom Russia will unite.
        1. Botanologist
          Botanologist 12 November 2014 00: 26
          +3
          Quote: Egor65G
          Israel fights radical Islam for decades


          How is it going? He became less, he weakened and disappeared?
          1. Egor65g
            Egor65g 12 November 2014 14: 18
            -1
            The whole world needs to fight this infection, and no one has more pipiska hi
        2. Botanologist
          Botanologist 12 November 2014 00: 26
          0
          Quote: Egor65G
          Israel fights radical Islam for decades


          How is it going? He became less, he weakened and disappeared?
          1. Netwallker
            Netwallker 12 November 2014 14: 23
            +3
            The epidemic must first be stopped so that it would not creep from edge to edge.
            What Israel successfully dealt with, with tied hands.
      2. Idel
        Idel 11 November 2014 22: 16
        +1
        I do not think that Syria will dare to bring down American planes. This is suicide for Assad.
        At the expense of arms supplies. I wrote that it is necessary to supply weapons, but for land units and preferably for money. Well, at worst, for food - at least for something. Stop wasting weapons and military equipment. Remember how many Egyptians have set everything. So what? Syrians are better? Who is better at all?
    3. rostov-dad
      rostov-dad 11 November 2014 22: 59
      +2
      through front companies oil (for what this mess started up)
  24. sv68
    sv68 11 November 2014 20: 31
    +2
    let's start guessing at the coffee grounds — will there be or not the supply of weapons to Syria? We realize that the Syrians will not be able to survive without our help, but alas, our opinion of those who make decisions is not at all interesting.
    1. Penzyac
      Penzyac 11 November 2014 21: 03
      0
      Quote: sv68
      let's start guessing at the coffee grounds — will there be or not the supply of weapons to Syria? We realize that the Syrians will not be able to survive without our help, but alas, our opinion of those who make decisions is not at all interesting.

      Perhaps you are partly right, but still, I do not think that our opinion is absolutely not of any interest to those who make decisions.
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 11 November 2014 21: 53
      +3
      Quote: sv68
      Alas, our opinion of those who make decisions is not at all interesting.

      Should this be regarded as a censure of the "unpopular in our country" Assad regime? Or, nevertheless, as an endorsement of the position of the Leader, who, disregarding the pressure of the US woman, decides to support Syria in its fight against the Yankees and their hirelings - ISIS fighters !?
      So where the Supreme did not take into account the opinion of the people of his country?
      Chatting anyway is not the best way to the truth! Or then more specifically express your attitude to the subject of discussion.
      For example, I support PU in his assistance to the Syrians, as It is in our national interests:
      - Do not let the pipe stretch from Qatar to Western Europe;
      - Do not let radical Islamists to their borders;
      - have in BV a country sympathetic to us, ready to provide the Navy for the fleet; etc.
  25. tyzyaga
    tyzyaga 11 November 2014 20: 33
    +1
    Recall that just a few days ago, the head of the Syrian Foreign Ministry, Walid Muallem, said that Russia would supply the Syrian army with S-300 complexes, the supply of which was suspended for several reasons

    The reason is the political potency of Russia!
  26. stonks
    stonks 11 November 2014 20: 46
    -4
    Quote: Bograntz
    But Assad is not up to Israel now: he would be able to cope with his own people, and if he did, then all the more it would not be up to Israel: the country is in ruins and the economy is under siege.


    You do not know EAST.
    Although ..., Assad at least somehow predictable. Without C300. :-)
  27. Yun Klob
    Yun Klob 11 November 2014 20: 48
    0
    Very logical and competent.
  28. The Art of War
    The Art of War 11 November 2014 20: 54
    +2
    [quote = stonks] And he does?
    So far, as far as I know, Israel treats IS fighters for free. Professors in the studio, let him explain.
    1. Netwallker
      Netwallker 11 November 2014 20: 59
      +7
      About a hundred residents of Druze villages held a protest against the aid in the Israeli Ziv hospital to the wounded from Syria. The Reshet Bet radio station reported about the protest action.

      Participants of this action claim that together with civilians who were injured as a result of hostilities in Syria, militants of various Islamist groups are getting treatment in Israel. Including militants of the "Islamic State" and the group "Jabat al-Nusra".
    2. Egor65g
      Egor65g 11 November 2014 21: 59
      +3
      Treat both those and others without distinction smile
  29. Aleksey_K
    Aleksey_K 11 November 2014 20: 56
    +8
    Quote: Idel
    Do we, as always, provide "fraternal" assistance or do we still get real money for it?

    This is not fraternal help. You need to look a little wider at the story. Syria is a country that Americans should not conquer. On the mystical side: Vanga also said that if Syria falls, the 3 World War (nuclear) will begin. If Syria falls, the bridgehead will expand for the deployment of American bases around Russia. The Islamic rebellion on the borders of Russia will intensify and may develop into an internal conflict in Russia. Syria in collusion with Russia does not allow the Saudis to build a gas pipeline through Syria and the South of Europe. And while Russia remains at the main gate of the European economy, which means that it can dictate its conditions to Europe. Syria helps us make money, and only this can make Russia help Syria for free.
    We have no normal relations with Israel. Those relations that were, remain the same, while we help Syria. And Israel is terribly afraid of Russian missile defense systems in Syria. Because of this, he cannot attack Syria until it fights off Islamic militants, knowing that Syria will not be able to fight on the 2 front. Because all Israeli planes and missiles will be destroyed on take-off on Israeli territory by Russian missile defense systems. For Israel, it will be a disaster. All Arabs around Israel will immediately attack him. Without aviation, without missiles, and all Jews immediately Arabs outweigh and the state of Israel will disappear from the face of the earth.
    Therefore, Russia and Israel do not have a good relationship.
    1. Netwallker
      Netwallker 11 November 2014 21: 06
      -1
      Do you seriously believe that a pair of missile defense systems will destroy all Israeli aviation + missiles?
      1. KBR109
        KBR109 11 November 2014 21: 47
        +1
        Why a couple of complexes! I think that a dozen divisions are able to remove the acuteness of the problem and somewhat lower the "people chosen by the Lord" to the sinful land.
      2. rostov-dad
        rostov-dad 11 November 2014 23: 05
        +1
        and would you fly to bomb an object if you knew in advance that an imminent death awaits you there?
    2. Idel
      Idel 11 November 2014 21: 21
      +5
      There is a contradiction in your words. It lies in the fact that Israel maintains good relations with us in the hope that we will not deliver the S-300 to Syria. If we put it there, then everything is clear - Israel must destroy these installations. The Arab world is diverse. Assad hated by many, the Palestinians, too. It’s not serious to say that they all will come out with a united front against Israel. Life has shown that this is not so.
      US bases in Syria? Maybe. And what bases in Turkey are few? Look carefully at the map: who is closer to Russia? And then, who will create the base where you are not welcome? It means getting involved in a war.
      About the gas pipeline. That's who really doesn’t need it, because it’s the Americans. They laid eyes on Europe with their gas, and then competitors.
      What does Russia need in this situation? DISTANCE from all this madness and try to earn as much as possible. How to earn? A weapon of money is worth it. Good money? Good ones. But a much larger conflict in the Persian Gulf is much better when oil prices rise sharply. Why not pit the United States with Syria and Iran? There’s a completely different song! The cost of the war will finally undermine the US economy, and Russia will earn very well on this. On what? On the same oil, on sales of weapons, on its influence - it costs money.
      Let’s think in specific categories: no one has canceled banknotes, weapons are acquired for them, social expenses are incurred, industry rises ... - what we now need. They are the collapse of the ruble, and we surprise them in the Persian Gulf
      1. padded jacket
        padded jacket 11 November 2014 21: 38
        +2
        Idel (3) RU Today, 21:21 ↑
        Why not pit the United States with Syria and Iran?


        It’s not much wrong for Russia to bring Israel and terrorists from the Islamic State, al-Nusra, etc.
        And let the United States get into it too, this will be the right decision.
        And with Iran and Syria smileThink for yourself why should we pit our allies in the region with the United States?
        This is just plain crazy.
        Moreover, Israel has always been our adversary in the region since the days of the USSR, its atomic weapons were added to the nuclear weapons of NATO.
        Since then, nothing has changed.
        In cases of conflict, he, as a US vassal, will threaten us with his atomic bomb.
        Like this smile
        1. Idel
          Idel 11 November 2014 22: 26
          +1
          I will answer. Only Iran’s conflict with the United States can raise oil prices. Only Iran is able to pay for the weapons it supplies. Iran is not our ally. He is our fellow traveler and will set us up at any moment.
          Moreover, Iran is the main supplier of oil to China. In the event of war, China will sit on a hungry rations. Just in case, the Chinese made a three-month supply of oil, but this is very small. The conflict may last a long time, which means that the growth rate of China's economy will slow down. Meanwhile, the United States will suffer significant losses in the economy. War is an expensive pleasure. This is where the grace period will come for Russia.
          We don’t have to get anywhere now. Trading - YES !!!! But do not climb by yourself.
          As for Israel. Yes, he is a natural ally of the United States in the region, but he will be replaced by Iran. We don’t have to go there at all
      2. Wladimir71
        Wladimir71 12 November 2014 06: 29
        0
        It sounds beautiful, but with whose money they will pay with us for the delivered weapons. Maybe in dollars? Or the euro. Again, the mills fight to strengthen the economies of those countries to which these currencies belong.
  30. hedgehog in the fog
    hedgehog in the fog 11 November 2014 21: 00
    +3
    the only effective solution to stop the wars in the Middle East is to force the United States to stop pouring loot into this feud, as soon as financial flows stop going there for the purposes of the White House, the situation will begin to improve dramatically.
  31. The Art of War
    The Art of War 11 November 2014 21: 02
    +3
    Syria. Jobar. Fights for the private sector. Part 4
  32. Const
    Const 11 November 2014 21: 03
    +2
    I recommend for the protection of air defense, BMPT "Terminator", TOS "Buratino", all kinds of reconnaissance priblud, armored vehicles and something else for trial.
  33. Drunya
    Drunya 11 November 2014 21: 05
    +5
    Andrey Filatov. Victor Kuznetsov, ANNA News, Damascus
    Syria. Jobar. Private Sector Fights

    Dara Positions SaaS
  34. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 11 November 2014 21: 17
    +2
    <<< According to the Syrian authorities, IS militants now have aviation, which means that the Russian S-300 will definitely be in demand. >>>
    A very convenient excuse for the supply of modern weapons to Syria, including the S-300, and thereby providing serious and necessary assistance to the people of Syria, which has been opposing the aggressive jihadist and gameocratic crap collected by the West and its Arab allies from all over the world for so long topple the unwanted legitimate government of Syria and destroy the state! There are too many people around Syria who want to establish different "no-fly zones" over Syria, and even, in general, under the guise of fighting ISIS, start bombing the Syrian army!
    1. The Art of War
      The Art of War 11 November 2014 21: 26
      +3
      IG fighters got aviation request for whom, then, the Yankees shoots, or they can only weapons (supposedly) mistakenly drop the IG
      1. padded jacket
        padded jacket 11 November 2014 21: 44
        +1
        The Art of War (6) RU Today, 21:26 PM ↑ New

        IG fighters got aviation


        Maybe it is Israel and Turkey who dump their help to bandits friends?
        Therefore, with the United States, their relationship has deteriorated.
      2. cergey51046
        cergey51046 12 November 2014 08: 20
        0
        Where they wanted, they dropped it there.
      3. cergey51046
        cergey51046 12 November 2014 08: 20
        0
        Where they wanted, they dropped it there.
  35. IAlex
    IAlex 11 November 2014 21: 17
    +2
    It is not a problem to supply them with a weapon, the problem is that they cannot fight as Jews, although for me Syria, Iran and Turkey from Arab countries have the most trained armies ...
    1. Neksel
      Neksel 12 November 2014 06: 16
      +1
      Quote: IAlex
      and Turkey from Arab countries

      Turkey is not an Arab country.
      1. IAlex
        IAlex 12 November 2014 11: 48
        0
        Yes, one hell that looks the same that the approaches are the same ...
  36. Kenji
    Kenji 11 November 2014 21: 20
    +7
    It is necessary to help with weapons and not only the S-300, armored vehicles must be supplied, because during the long period of the war, so many of it, ammunition, communications systems, and corny dry packs and other things were destroyed, because all this eats up at a tremendous speed, and who else will help the Syrian military if not we.
  37. padded jacket
    padded jacket 11 November 2014 21: 21
    +4
    By the way, Israelis, is this happening now with you? (Like a record dated Nov 11, 2014)
    And then I don’t want to check it myself smile
    A series of terrorist attacks in Israel Arabs staged a rebellion
  38. Urri
    Urri 11 November 2014 22: 03
    +1
    Quote: hedgehog in the fog
    as soon as financial flows cease to go there for the purposes of the White House,


    As soon as the gold dinar gets stronger, they will give for the dollar only in the snout, and not that they will not fight.
  39. polkownik1
    polkownik1 11 November 2014 22: 15
    0
    T.N. IS aircraft will be beaten by itself. But Erdogan will cool down ...
  40. raven75
    raven75 11 November 2014 22: 20
    0
    And the air defense system is what they fuck. The most awesome way to shoot Americans from the sky? So they seem to have gone crazy from their "child" and are now hammering at him with might and main. Here it is even just right to support the United States, as it is not disgusting. The United States nurtured this very ISIS, and now, they do not know what to do with it.
  41. Yugra
    Yugra 11 November 2014 22: 38
    0
    Let’s deliver already! And it’s clear that the Syrians themselves will not be able to cope with such complex weapons ... But we, like in Vietnam, people of unknown nationality, simply shot down Americanos planes. Well, here too ...
  42. Alcoholic
    Alcoholic 11 November 2014 22: 42
    0
    C-300 against ISIS aviation?))
    Uuuh I get it.
    And I still look in the air only the aviation of crazy radicals curls.
    And they bomb themselves. And fly in the immediate vicinity of ... Assad.
    Wacky diplomacy again? wassat
    It’s not easier to say: "We are buying the S-300 so that the Americans and their mongrels think once again before poking where they don’t need to"
    Simple and tasteful.
    wassat
  43. Ze Kot
    Ze Kot 11 November 2014 23: 30
    0
    Quote: PENZYAC
    Quote: The Cat
    Quote: MIKHALYCHXNNX
    It would be better "Buratino" ... a game with our calculations ...



    They have mostly urban battles. Whom are you going to use "Buratino" against?

    Urban battles, mainly with the so-called opposition, and not only in cities are at war with the IS.




    Well, IG is not in the open field ... I'm sorry, the desert is sitting. They are also grouped among civilians. Take Kobani ... Where is it to apply? Or wait until they are on the march?
  44. GDV
    GDV 12 November 2014 00: 01
    +2
    Do not want Syria support? Stop licking America's asshole.
  45. alexander 2
    alexander 2 12 November 2014 00: 19
    +1
    Quote: Tyumen
    The bad thing is that all the evil from the planet flock to them in masses. It fills the ranks.

    But other countries are freed from this evil spirits. Wait until they gather there more and slam one hit. The main thing is to agree on how to do this and not let them scatter like cockroaches.
  46. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 12 November 2014 02: 16
    0
    The first photo of the 9P140 combat vehicle of the 220-mm MLRS 9K57 "Uragan" of the Syrian army appeared. Although the presence of the Hurricane MLRS in service with the Syrian army has been mentioned in some Western sources for many years, there was no information about their delivery there and no evidence of their presence by the Syrian army before their sudden use this year.

    I hope that the first photos of the Syrian army's 300-mm MLRS "Smerch" combat vehicles will appear soon.
    http://imp-navigator.livejournal.com
  47. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 12 November 2014 04: 19
    0
    Pure business !!! For money, any of your whims. It doesn’t turn out like the amers have, will our weapons fight against us? The East is a delicate and vile affair.
  48. Leonidych
    Leonidych 12 November 2014 05: 59
    +1
    Russia will supply the Syrian army with weapons to fight the "Islamic state" .... more precisely, it will be for the war with America
  49. Wladimir71
    Wladimir71 12 November 2014 06: 36
    0
    Our long-range aviation needs to drop vacuum bombs at training centers
  50. cergey51046
    cergey51046 12 November 2014 08: 14
    0
    It was not necessary not to suspend for the sake of the West. Another ship needs to be adjusted so that the West does not interfere.