Military Review

In the USA, the Aegis missile defense system intercepted 3 missiles for the first time

55
For the first time, the Americans, using the Aegis missile defense system, almost simultaneously intercepted three air targets - one ballistic and two cruise missiles. In the test, which took place over the Pacific Ocean in the Hawaiian Islands, took part destroyer «John Paul Jones». Reports about it TASS with reference to the US Defense Ministry’s Pro Agency.

In the USA, the Aegis missile defense system intercepted 3 missiles for the first time


“During the test, all three training targets were simultaneously launched from a test site on the island of Kauai and detected by a radar that is part of the Aegis system. The ballistic missile was destroyed by the Standard-3 Block 1В interceptor, and the cruise missiles - by the improved Standard-2 Block 3А, ”the missile defense agency said in a statement.

During the test, the work of other components of the Aegis system, including the command and control station and sensors installed on two unmanned aerial vehicles MQ-9 and Ripper and on the ground, was also checked, the agency notes.

According to the agency, “it was already the 29-th successful target interception during the 35 flight tests under the Aegis program, which began in the 2002 year.” In general, under the missile defense program with 2001, the United States carried out 82 flight tests, of which 66 are considered successful.

Aegis complexes will be incorporated into an integrated missile defense system in Europe, which the United States is creating together with other NATO member countries. “This system will help protect American troops stationed there as well as our allies and partners from missile threats,” the Defense Ministry summarizes.
55 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. alex-s
    alex-s 7 November 2014 13: 04
    +3
    And they forgot about the SU-24?
    1. pavel_SPB
      pavel_SPB 7 November 2014 13: 06
      +8
      the enemy does not sleep.
      1. Viktor Kudinov
        Viktor Kudinov 7 November 2014 13: 12
        0
        Our missiles must hit targets.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. APES
          APES 7 November 2014 13: 32
          +8
          Quote: Victor Kudinov
          Our missiles must hit targets.


          Russian missiles can even overcome the modernized American missile defense system, but Russia does not want to escalate the tension that the Americans provoke by deploying missile defense systems at the Russian borders that can carry out both defensive and offensive functions, the first deputy head of the United Russia Duma faction, member of the committee on defense, Afghan veteran Franz Klintsevich.

          According to him, now no one has any doubts or illusions that the United States initially put up these funds against Russia, and not against the supposedly Iranian threat.

          “But they were late with the missile defense system, because we are able to overcome the missile defense system,” he said.

          “We do not want anything, but it’s better not to touch us. Today we are ready to protect ourselves, our territory, citizens of the Russian Federation, and we need all to clearly understand this, ”Klintsevich said.
          1. s1н7т
            s1н7т 7 November 2014 20: 38
            0
            Quote: APES
            Russian missiles can overcome even the modernized American missile defense system


            Do not understand. How can missiles overcome missile defense, which will fire at them during the climb? Or Klintsevich leads us by the nose?
            1. Boa kaa
              Boa kaa 7 November 2014 23: 42
              +2
              Quote: c1n7
              How can missiles overcome missile defense, which will fire at them during the climb?

              Information for thought.
              1. ICBM "Yars" passes OUT 4 times faster than "Voevoda", and 2 times faster than ICBMs with LPRE.
              2. Covering the launch with electronic warfare systems (active-aiming and passive interference) by 2,5 -3 times increases the likelihood of non-detection in the airborne radar.
              3. X-101 rocket launchers, made using low visibility technology, are able to bypass the areas of the air defense system.
              4. The Himalayas (estimated) are 2 times more effective than the Khibiny, April 12 this year. who brought the crew of "Cook" to hysterics.
              And then there are things like "Satchel", "Rubezh", "Krasukha", TK-25M, "Alabuga", and "something else that is not taught at school, and something else that is not talked about"!
              So, not everything is as sad as it seems at first glance.
        3. Natalia
          Natalia 7 November 2014 15: 39
          +2
          Aegis combat system, a good thing. Especially with their SM-3 missiles.
          By the way, Aegis is translated as “Aegis,” the mythical shield of Zeus and Athena.

          Our "Aegis" should be ready by 2017 - the S-500.
          It will just be a full-fledged domestic missile defense.
          1. Dry_T-50
            Dry_T-50 9 November 2014 14: 16
            0
            Quote: Natalia
            Our "Aegis" should be ready by 2017 - the S-500.

            It will ... Yes, it should already be, if you look at the current political situation. am
            But it’s better late than never. It is necessary to thank the Soviet industrialists for a wonderful reserve. Who knows, maybe more 140 millions of people still live thanks to him ... Remember what Thatcher said?
      2. Tiksi-3
        Tiksi-3 7 November 2014 13: 14
        +6
        this is a problem, and it must be solved the day before yesterday ...
        1. potap28722872
          potap28722872 7 November 2014 13: 33
          -7
          Fuck one uy nonlite Pus bu))))))))))
        2. Natalia
          Natalia 7 November 2014 23: 02
          +1
          Quote: Tiksi-3
          this is a problem, and it must be solved the day before yesterday ...

          The day before yesterday the Union collapsed ...... sorry, we were not up to the IJIS.
          If you have not noticed.
    2. Sergei1982
      Sergei1982 7 November 2014 13: 10
      +5
      Of course, this is only in the field conditions, but nonetheless, the possibilities of Aegis are growing.
      1. Muadipus
        Muadipus 7 November 2014 13: 16
        +21
        and weakly to shoot down 4 rockets? and six? but an unexpected person? not yours?
        1. Black Colonel
          Black Colonel 7 November 2014 13: 25
          +13
          and weakly to shoot down 4 rockets? and six? but an unexpected person? not yours?
          ... and over land and rough terrain?
          And with false goals and during the operation of electronic warfare equipment ???
          1. the villain
            the villain 8 November 2014 00: 39
            -1
            Quote: Black Colonel
            and weakly to shoot down 4 rockets? and six? and unexpected? and not yours? ... but over land and rough terrain? And with false goals and when operating electronic warfare equipment ???

            The grandmother would answer so ...
        2. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 7 November 2014 13: 30
          +5
          Quote: Muadipus
          and weakly to shoot down 4 rockets? and six?

          4 - theoretically possible. But only if one of them is ballistic, and the third "Standard" is worked out on it.
          Because, EMNIP, on the second "Standards" is the PAR of the GOS. Therefore, the number of these missiles, simultaneously guided in the final section, is limited by the number of AN / SPG-62 illumination radars, of which there are only 3 on the "Burks".
          1. just exp
            just exp 7 November 2014 13: 37
            +8
            only the backlight radar is switched on only at the final section.
            and while the radar directs one missile, the others are already flying up.
            I don’t defend, but it’s stupid to think that they are stupid and don’t know anything.
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 7 November 2014 15: 17
              +6
              Quote: just explo
              only the backlight radar is switched on only at the final section.
              and while the radar directs one missile, the others are already flying up.

              The problem is that goals are flying up too. And although the GOS itself in PAR mode only works for a few seconds on the final segment, it is also required to transfer the radar beam to the next target, to capture it and to maintain stable tracking (we don’t want to drive missiles into water due to disruption of tracking with loss of the reflected signal) time.
              The height of the radar above the waterline is 30 meters. So, for targets reaching 50 meters, it will be able to work, God forbid, from 40-45 kilometers.
              It would not turn out that it is too late to shine. smile

              It is not for nothing that the Yankees make the Standard with the AR / PAR of the GOS, which does not require radar target illumination - like the AIM-120 GOS.
              1. 73bor
                73bor 7 November 2014 21: 34
                +1
                Here's how it is hard to believe in such a situation where the Aegis always had problems with low-flying ones, they probably fired in complete calm
            2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
              Andrei from Chelyabinsk 7 November 2014 15: 42
              +4
              Quote: just explo
              only the backlight radar is switched on only at the final section.
              and while the radar directs one missile, the others are already flying up.

              This is what the Americans say. But I never came across information that they at least once SHOWED THIS.
              And I can talk a lot laughing
        3. just exp
          just exp 7 November 2014 13: 36
          +1
          and how are 4 from 3 different? although if you're talking about the number of backlight channels, then anyway, they’ll knock down one more and don’t choke, to find out only how Aegis works on maneuvering goals.
          1. aleks 62
            aleks 62 7 November 2014 13: 49
            +4
            to know only how Aegis works on maneuvering goals .....


            ....... I especially want to know how supersonic ..... And it seems to me that they are training on axes .... And as they say in Odessa, there are two big differences ..... and the number of successful tests is not especially impressive - about 80% .....
            1. just exp
              just exp 7 November 2014 14: 44
              +1
              in the mid 90s they could not work on a single mosquito, but since then almost 20 years have passed, and 3.14ndos are able to draw conclusions and ZURki have updated. but not the fact that the updated ones can.
            2. iwind
              iwind 7 November 2014 14: 45
              +4
              Quote: aleks 62
              to know only how Aegis works on maneuvering goals .....


              ....... I especially want to know how supersonic ..... And it seems to me that they are training on axes .... And as they say in Odessa, there are two big differences ..... and the number of successful tests is not especially impressive - about 80% .....

              Not only. for the last time on October 24, 2014 a supersonic (somewhere 2,5max) GQM-163 Coyote was shot down 5 meters long with a diameter of 40 cm low-flying (about 4 meters high) against the background of water using the SM-6. Moreover, another destroyer was burnt due to the horizontal highlighting.
              http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/raytheon-sm-6s-intercept-targets-in-enga
              ge-on-remote-tests-523540582.html
              1. bif
                bif 7 November 2014 16: 43
                +1
                Quote: iwind
                the last time 24 October 2014 was hit by a supersonic (somewhere 2,5machine) GQM-163 Coyote with a length of 5 meters with a diameter of 40cm low flying (altitude of about 4 meters) against the background of water using SM-6. Moreover, another destroyer was burnt due to the radio-illumination.

                Now the Americans have caught up with the French .. "At the beginning of April 2012, the French Navy destroyer Forbin, using the PAAMS / Aster anti-aircraft missile system, successfully shot down a GQM-163A Coyote training target missile during an ongoing French Navy exercise. This version of the missile -targets Coyote was specially designed as a simulator of the Soviet-Russian anti-ship anti-ship Granite / Mosquito anti-ship missiles and was provided by the Americans to the French as NATO allies ... "
                BUT this does not change anything, because full-time Mosquitoes our sailors have been knocking down for decades.
                But "Caliber" is far from "Coyote" ...
                1. iwind
                  iwind 7 November 2014 20: 39
                  +1
                  Quote: bif
                  But "Caliber" is far from "Coyote" ...

                  What is the difference? Coet even for a more difficult purpose, the dimensions are smaller.
                  Quote: bif
                  Now the Americans have caught up with the French.

                  He was shot down before, but not SM-6. The key point here is that they shot down behind the radio horizon and was guided by a different destroyer.
                  The main plus will be for AUG. Although many here think that AUG is a group of ships sailing in a dense group. But in the endangered period, the distance between the ships in the AOG is not me 50-100 km, the point is to expand the radar field as much as possible, so that the EW systems of one destroyer do not interfere with another and do not overlap each other's line of fire (like the English have the Falklands). That is, if an advanced destroyer (or hokai) that is located, for example, 100-200 km from an aircraft carrier, detects the launch of anti-ship missiles or the anti-ship missiles themselves, these missiles will operate the entire squadron with a range of SM-240 km, and since the SM-6 has homing with ARGSN , then there is no need to illuminate the target from the destroyer to the final sections, therefore the nearest destroyer can still use middle and near radius missiles. And this will significantly increase the defense ability of the aug.
          2. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 7 November 2014 23: 58
            +1
            Quote: just explo
            to know only how Aegis works on maneuvering goals.

            Quote: just explo
            . I especially want to know how supersonic.

            Our Mosquitoes after a certain time (in accordance with the SAM system) sharply changed the parameters of the target’s movement, which led to a breakdown in tracking and a repeat of the cycle. And so until the meeting of the Kyrgyz Republic with a goal. Know-how is simply disgraceful, but not many know about it. And the worst thing for the Yankees is that they don’t react to REP ...
            It's easier with the Club: after capturing the target, the warhead with 200 kg of sea mixture (or TGA) rushes to the NK board in supersonic manner, and its radar continues to locate the "flying pole". Target separation is noticed late, when liferafts are ready.
            The torch was a problem, but it seems that it was solved by shooting IR traps.
            Something like this. IMHO.
    3. Giant thought
      Giant thought 7 November 2014 13: 55
      0
      These goals simply flew without interfering with the destroyer's equipment and missile defense.
    4. The comment was deleted.
  2. Same lech
    Same lech 7 November 2014 13: 05
    +11
    The system is improving ... an alarming factor.

    The United States has embarked on the unpunished destruction of RUSSIA.

    Under these conditions, we will inevitably have to withdraw from the RSiMD restriction treaty .... ITS SAFETY MORE EXPENSIVELY ...
    1. Duke
      Duke 7 November 2014 13: 13
      +3
      Aegis combat system (“Aegis”, from the English. Aegis - “Aegis”, the mythical shield of Zeus and Athens) is an American naval multifunctional combat information and control system (BIUS), which is an integrated network of naval means of lighting the situation, means of destruction, such as anti-aircraft guided missiles Standard missile 2 (SM-2) and more modern Standard missile 3 (SM-3), and control tools, formed on the basis of the widespread introduction of automated combat control systems (ASBU). The system allows you to receive and process information from sensors of other ships and aircraft of the connection and issue target designations to their launchers. The name "Aegis" also bears the air defense system used as part of this CIUS.
      To date, the Aegis BIUS is used by the Navy of the USA, Spain, Norway, the Republic of Korea and the Naval Self-Defense Forces of Japan (in total, more than 100 ships are equipped with it). Soon, the Aegis installation is expected on the new Australian Navy air defense destroyers. In addition, US Navy ships equipped with this system will be used as a ship component of the European missile defense system (NATO).
      American ships equipped with Aegis initially used Standard-2 missiles, and some of them are currently being converted to Standard-3 missiles.
      If the SM-2 Block IV interceptor missiles are used to destroy ballistic missiles in the atmosphere at the final stage of their flight, and their warhead is equipped with a fragmentation warhead with conventional explosives, the SM-3 interceptor missile destroys ballistic missiles located in the middle of the trajectory and flying outside the atmosphere, with the help of a kinetic warhead, that is, by shock-contact interaction [
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 7 November 2014 15: 44
        +5
        Yeah. Only - a small nuance - if the destroyer is located further than 150 km from the ballistic missile launch site, the SM-3 will not have time to intercept the ballista
        1. Dry_T-50
          Dry_T-50 9 November 2014 14: 18
          0
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          Yeah. Only - a small nuance - if the destroyer is located further than 150 km from the ballistic missile launch site, the SM-3 will not have time to intercept the ballista

          And it’s not a fact that the destroyer / cruiser will not be attacked before this.
    2. Znayka
      Znayka 7 November 2014 14: 06
      0
      I agree with you. As far as I know, work on hypersound does not stand still ...
  3. Vitaly Anisimov
    Vitaly Anisimov 7 November 2014 13: 05
    +1
    Well, if we run our "bast shoes" ..?
    1. Locksmith
      Locksmith 7 November 2014 13: 11
      +4
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Well, if we run our "bast shoes" ..?

      oh well. they seem to have flogged years into their ajis disc — they couldn’t shoot down from the target, supposedly the target inadequately maneuvered wink
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 8 November 2014 00: 13
      +2
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Well, if we run our "bast shoes" ..?

      We offered to do this to "partners" back in the distant 80s. They refused. Then it was proposed to deliver the "pennant" with the help of ICBMs to a predetermined point on the territory of the "partners" - and again the refusal. But on the other hand, at all corners there were stars that they are cooler than hard-boiled eggs!
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 7 November 2014 13: 05
    -4
    Aegis systems will be included in the integrated missile defense system in Europe, which the United States is creating together with other NATO member countries


    And all this will be on our borders. A little more and the Merikatos will start "blitzkring"
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 8 November 2014 00: 20
      +1
      Quote: aszzz888
      A little more and the Merikatos will start "blitzkring"

      You probably confused them with Nazi Germany: Adolf Aloizovich used the BlitzKrieg concept, and modern adventurers and peddlers of "democracy" adopted the concept of an Instant Global Strike.
      Look at the nuances yourself, if it becomes interesting. And if not, then it will do!
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. svp67
    svp67 7 November 2014 13: 08
    +5
    This is of course success, what can I say. And against the missiles of the DPRK or Iran itself. Since their territory is not large and the flight paths of missiles are predictable in this case, but they know how to maneuver not only against our missiles, but also start from places that you won’t immediately install ?????? Therefore, I wish that new BZHDK, RKSN atomarins and air strategists would get on the database faster ...
  7. Denis fj
    Denis fj 7 November 2014 13: 08
    +2
    Sensation, cho.
  8. saag
    saag 7 November 2014 13: 10
    0
    the next step is something like a tandem part of a rocket, the head detachment (or package) will be a missile interceptor
  9. Velesovich
    Velesovich 7 November 2014 13: 12
    +6
    Well, that’s the joke. The system is working. It is clear that so far it cannot repel a strike by Russian nuclear forces, but the key word here is "YET". Let's see what we will answer.
    1. Denis fj
      Denis fj 7 November 2014 16: 29
      +1
      Here's the answer!
      The factory for the production of long-range missiles 77N6-N and 77N6-N1 for air defense systems works in streaming mode (INFORMATION SECRET)
      It is only known that the radius of destruction is 600 km and higher ...
      The Ministry of Defense will build two large plants in Nizhny Novgorod and Kirov. These enterprises will produce 77N6-N and 77N6-H1 hypersonic missiles for the latest missile defense systems (missile defense): the S-400 Triumph and the S-500 Prometey
      With these missiles, anti-aircraft missile systems (S-400 and S-500) will be able to shoot down any targets flying at a speed of up to 7 kilometers per second, including nuclear warheads of ballistic missiles.
  10. bmv04636
    bmv04636 7 November 2014 13: 14
    +3
    In the meantime, the "light elves" intercepted their missiles in a day, the Apache and the F-16 crashed
  11. Dwarfik
    Dwarfik 7 November 2014 13: 14
    +3
    Puffy populist screams! They wrote that our army is 60 times weaker than the NATO one, tell me, but the legally incapable army of Germany admitted what it itself is, then where are these 60 times !!!? Do not believe these loud screams and all! The information war is in action and it is impossible to succumb to its methods !!! Now the Archs will draw themselves successful and omnipotent, evoking a sense of inferiority in their heads, and then they will heat up the degree and sharply find the culprit of all this! Pointing to someone - I think so clearly!
    1. _my opinion
      _my opinion 7 November 2014 14: 10
      0
      true - in this way the Americans create illusions:
      1 that it was not in vain that they spent money
      2 that under the wing of amerikosov you can "sleep peacefully"
  12. FREGATENKAPITAN
    FREGATENKAPITAN 7 November 2014 13: 16
    +6
    Thank! Signal received! The volley will consist of 4 anti-ship missiles!
  13. The Art of War
    The Art of War 7 November 2014 13: 17
    +3
    The ballistic missile was destroyed by the Standard-3 Block 1B interceptor, and the cruise missiles by the improved Standard-2 Block 3A, ”the missile defense agency said in a statement. Ballistic missile - what speed? What height? cruise missiles are the same what speed and altitude and what are their characteristics of these target missiles? request
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 7 November 2014 23: 38
      0
      Quote: The Art of War
      Ballistic missile - what speed?

      Ballistic missile simulators can be target missiles:
      Aegis Readiness Assessment Vehicle (ARAV-C)
      The missile itself is called Talos Castor-1, based on Talos missiles



      or Medium Range Target (MRT) based on MGM-29 Sergeant

  14. Stiletto
    Stiletto 7 November 2014 13: 23
    +3
    Quote: FREGATENKAPITAN
    Thank! Signal received! The volley will consist of 4 anti-ship missiles!


    Yes, even one is enough for them, because, unlike target missiles, ours maneuver "incorrectly" and "meanly". which then Psaki will not fail to mention. Well, if, of course, he survives.
  15. doctor
    doctor 7 November 2014 13: 25
    -3
    Aegis is rusty scrap metal.
    1. doctor
      doctor 7 November 2014 15: 30
      0
      Once again from me. Aegis is a buggy system. And if she worked 1 time in tests, then she has continuous failures, failures, and a black streak of bad luck. Let them test their junk on exercises. I will laugh heartily.
      1. doctor
        doctor 7 November 2014 18: 34
        +1
        Minus one. You will laugh too.
  16. ararat
    ararat 7 November 2014 13: 27
    0
    The Americans went to the trick. They installed lighthouse sensors and now they spotted rockets that are 20-30 years old. They just want the world to hear them.
  17. just exp
    just exp 7 November 2014 13: 34
    0
    but this is bad news, especially if one ship hit them, and how many shouts there were that Aegis had few backlight channels (there were only three emnip there, but anyway).
  18. GUS
    GUS 7 November 2014 13: 36
    0
    Ponte is also a weapon.
  19. kompotnenado
    kompotnenado 7 November 2014 13: 36
    +1
    A kinetic warhead cannot hit maneuvering targets. Or am I catching up with something.
    1. GRAY
      GRAY 7 November 2014 14: 24
      +2
      Quote: kompotnenado
      A kinetic warhead cannot hit maneuvering targets. Or am I catching up with something.

      You can’t beat anything with a simple blank, of course, but here it’s not so simple:
      The Mk 142 interception stage is a homing device, on board of which there are a matrix IR-GOS with a cryogenic unit, several processors, a solid propellant maneuvering and orientation installation (DACS), a power source and a number of other subsystems.
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 8 November 2014 00: 34
        +2
        Quote: GRAY
        The Mk 142 interception stage is a homing device, on board of which there are a matrix IR-GOS with a cryogenic unit, several processors, a solid propellant maneuvering and orientation installation (DACS), a power source and a number of other subsystems

        Sergey, then write to the end: the remote control provides only 3 pulse rate correction ... And then, if the BB continues to maneuver?
        Our simply Vigorous Fenny swept everything around, and here you need to get a "bullet in a bullet" ... and preferably the first time!
  20. Shamsik
    Shamsik 7 November 2014 13: 38
    +4
    Joking as a joke, but America is a serious enemy, this is a fact. I hope they will draw our conclusions (or rather, they will).
  21. Dragon-y
    Dragon-y 7 November 2014 13: 46
    +2
    It's just that something "underwater" can sneak up on the destroyer at this time - don't forget about it.
  22. Sirjey
    Sirjey 7 November 2014 13: 48
    +8
    Those who publish the achievements of the Americans in the defense industry are obviously doomed to cons!)))) I don’t understand why the article was blown away) It’s interesting to read about their development and capabilities.
    1. jurassic61
      jurassic61 7 November 2014 14: 03
      +3
      I put a plus article especially after the spring system tests in the Black Sea
  23. GRF
    GRF 7 November 2014 13: 55
    0
    if world 3 is the end of humanity ...
    there is a wild idea ... to tell the whole world about a super duper bomb in the center of Russia ... deep ... deep ... enough to destroy the planet ...
    and the "indestructible dead hand" ...

    and in response to their militarism, they will engage in the humanization of their society with children, culture, enlightenment for example ...
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 8 November 2014 00: 56
      +1
      Quote: GRF
      there is a wild idea ... to tell the whole world about a super duper bomb in the center of Russia ... deep ... deep ... enough to destroy the planet ...

      Yes, it's better as Vladimir Volfovich! From the TV screen - the Atlantic coast of the states "has been mined with nuclear bombs since the times of the USSR! That's what you need to think about, not about NATO's advancement to our borders!"
      And there was such silence in the studio ... although before that, the speakers had just not torn each other's hair on their heads! Poor Amerov correspondent was speechless!
      That's what I understand! And you, friend sieve, all strive to castrate yourself instead of USayki. No, that won't do! Better than one megaton-class ICBM to miss the Yellowstone super volcano! And there is nothing more to invent! The gates of ADA themselves will open before the "unique" nation! (Fu you, rabble from all over the world!)
  24. 3vs
    3vs 7 November 2014 14: 02
    +4
    Ours would have fuss, under the guise of a fourth to them to throw a combat target! bully
  25. Alexander
    Alexander 7 November 2014 14: 06
    0
    Here is disgusting, take the Su-24 laughing
  26. sv68
    sv68 7 November 2014 14: 18
    +1
    so the destroyer John Paul Jones is kind of drowned by aliens in the movie "sea battle". fool fool
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 7 November 2014 14: 31
      +2
      The aliens, seeing all the power of Aegis, decided not to offend the child and returned the destroyer to them.
  27. fzr1000
    fzr1000 7 November 2014 14: 54
    +2
    It is necessary, as Sakharov suggested, when he had not yet signed up for human rights activists, to undermine nuclear weapons off the coast of the United States, provoking a tsunami, and to hammer into some California fault so that the Ticonderoga could not return. And to defuse missile defense in Poland and other neighboring states with the help of ground-based special operations.

    The overseas tsuki got them, so that all of them would be taken by Ebola and Cthulhu.
  28. Vadim237
    Vadim237 7 November 2014 15: 51
    +1
    And they knew their characteristics and knew where they would fly from — such a pro in combat conditions is doomed to failure.
  29. Barakuda
    Barakuda 7 November 2014 16: 26
    +1
    Aegis is a cool system. But it doesn’t suit Russian conditions. How many times have already fucked up. And then "successful interception". Cutting a shtatovskiy roach.
  30. komel
    komel 7 November 2014 23: 40
    +1
    In my opinion, the United States can be congratulated on successful firing. Indeed, the concept of long-range missile defense as a ship component is the basis of missile defense of the bast over the superpower.

    Most likely, such technologies of global interaction are present in the Russian Federation. In the Russian Federation, I suspect by and large the system exists in the submarine fleet, and the coordination of the grouping is ensured by a group of scientific vessels.

    As for the new karabole construction projects, there really is a backlog of the USSR which, together with new developments, gives reliability in use. The use of long-range missile defense should be laid not only on long-range navigation, but also on the coastal radius. Such systems can be put on stream in a short time by modernization.

    The Almaz-Antey Air Defense Concern will have work, and the Russian Federation will have even better protection.
  31. Vita_vko
    Vita_vko 8 November 2014 04: 34
    0
    As always, Americans wishful thinking
    For the first time, with the help of the Aegis missile defense system, almost simultaneously intercepted three air targets — one ballistic and two cruise missiles.
    The keyword is almost simultaneous. I wonder how it is? If the speed of a ballistic missile is about 10 times higher than the speed of a cruise missile. Thus, we return to the classics and the Aegis system turns out to be single-channel when working on a ballistic target and 2-channel when working on low-altitude.
    Although one should pay tribute to the SM-3 Block IIB technology, which provides for the use of remote target designation from remote radars and control systems with the possibility of updating target data during the flight, is promising and will significantly increase the survivability of the missile defense and air defense systems, and the kinetic warhead makes these missiles significantly more compact.