In Kaliningrad, the ceremony will launch a patrol for the Black Sea Fleet

52
On November 7, the Yantar Baltic Shipyard in Kaliningrad will host a ceremony for launching the second frigate Admiral Essen, a patrol ship of project 11356, which is being built for the Russian Navy fleet, which will be attended by representatives of the Ministry of Defense and the Navy of the Russian Federation, reports "Russian newspaper".

In Kaliningrad, the ceremony will launch a patrol for the Black Sea Fleet


The ship has a fully formed hull and superstructure. At the moment, the mounting of the main equipment and weapon systems is being completed. Completion of the frigate will hold on the water, after which the test program will begin.

The construction of the Admiral Essen TFR began in July 2011. The ship was named after Admiral Nikolai Essen, who commanded the battleship Sevastopol during the defense of Port Arthur and held the post of commander of the Baltic Fleet in 1909-1915.

It should be noted that all six frigates of the series, which are built on the "Yantar" for the Black Sea Fleet, will receive the names of famous Russian naval commanders. The first ship, the Admiral Grigorovich, whose construction began in December 2010, was launched in March 2014. He is now in the testing phase and will be handed over to the customer in 2015 year.


At the moment, the factory laid "admirals" Makarov, Istomin and Butakov. Bookmark the sixth frigate is planned in the near future. The entire series of ships will be ready for 2017 year.
52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +28
    6 November 2014 10: 15
    Seven feet under the keel!!!
    1. +10
      6 November 2014 10: 18
      The second one has gone! The great news, apparently, the affairs of shipbuilders under tight control were adjusted.
      1. VPO
        VPO
        +21
        6 November 2014 10: 38
        Everything was fine. Just in connection with growing orders, an acute shortage of workers. No welders, turners. For 2 years, personnel from former countries have been actively imported. They try to keep their own, the education system in the 90s makes itself felt. Some lawyers, managers and dentists.
        1. +1
          6 November 2014 12: 17
          and who will tell ..... are there turbines for all the series? ... or only three pieces?
      2. -3
        6 November 2014 11: 15
        The best use of budget funds.
        1. FACKtoREAL
          -2
          6 November 2014 13: 04
          The best use of budget funds.

          But would it be worse to direct budget funds to ..
          improving the well-being of citizens, improving the quality of life?
          alas, defense spending is a "necessary burden" for the budget of any state ...
          1. +5
            6 November 2014 13: 05
            Quote: FACKtoREAL
            But would it be worse to direct budget funds to ..
            improving the well-being of citizens, improving the quality of life?
            alas, defense spending is a necessity and burdensome for the budget of any state ...

            You do not want to contain your army, you contain someone else's.
          2. 0
            6 November 2014 16: 42
            when money goes to construction, tank ships, etc. , then the builders receive a salary for this money, the local budget in the form of taxes, respectively, this money goes to the communal apartment and hospitals,
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +4
      6 November 2014 10: 20
      Well, we can ...! And how many yells around these "Mistrals" Themselves need yes it is difficult but not enough specialists and modern shipyards .. You cannot hope to the West (how we are now being broken off and what losses we are suffering) God forbid!
      1. 0
        6 November 2014 10: 25
        I want to see the finished version
      2. +1
        6 November 2014 10: 48
        Mistral has four times its displacement.
        1. +2
          6 November 2014 13: 02
          Quote: ilya_oz
          Mistral has four times its displacement.

          -------------------------
          At Stan 5000 in Chelyabinsk, a large format sheet is now being rolled, the questions are the same that I posed in the next article about the dock ship and for which the "managers and dentists" gave me a couple of drawbacks, without explaining anything ...
      3. +1
        6 November 2014 13: 20
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Well, we can ...! And how many yells around these "Mistrals" Themselves need yes it is difficult but not enough specialists and modern shipyards .. You cannot hope to the West (how we are now being broken off and what losses we are suffering) God forbid!

        ------------------------
        I have about the same comment in the next topic for more minuses ogreb ...))
    4. Pervusha Isaev
      -5
      6 November 2014 10: 31
      do we build everything? and when do we start making OCEAN VESSELS, which could come pin_dosam on eggs?
      1. +7
        6 November 2014 10: 37
        Quote: Pervusha Isaev
        do we build everything? and when do we start making OCEAN VESSELS, which could come pin_dosam on eggs?

        OCEAN SHIPS guard the sea border - you can stay without pants.
        1. Pervusha Isaev
          +1
          6 November 2014 10: 45
          Quote: GRAY
          Quote: Pervusha Isaev
          do we build everything? and when do we start making OCEAN VESSELS, which could come pin_dosam on eggs?

          OCEAN SHIPS guard the sea border - you can stay without pants.


          why "guard"? ocean warships are a DEMONSTRATION OF THE POWER OF THE STATE, an object of envy and admiration among friends and enemies ...
          1. -4
            6 November 2014 13: 21
            It is possible to demonstrate the power of the state not only by shaking eggs, but also by good deeds, a good example. We are not some aggressors - we are defending ourselves, and we are not going to capture.
            1. +3
              6 November 2014 14: 16
              Quote: theadenter
              It is possible to demonstrate the power of the state not only by shaking eggs, but also by good deeds, a good example. We are not some aggressors - we are defending ourselves, and we are not going to capture.

              Good must be with fists. And recent events in the world have shown the complete helplessness of good deeds. Enough. It's time to ring steel Faberge!
            2. +1
              6 November 2014 14: 26
              theadenter RU Today, 13: 21 ↑
              Demonstrating the power of the state can be not only shaking eggs


              ... Well, don’t shake it.
              We are not aggressors, but it’s better to guard over the Mid-Atlantic Range, it will be somehow calmer ... good
          2. 0
            6 November 2014 16: 04
            Quote: Pervusha Isaev
            why "guard"? ocean warships - DEMONSTRATION OF THE POWER OF THE STATE

            Because we have many miles of the sea border just bare. I don’t understand much about this issue, but I understand that one ship is not enough for a hypothetical segment of the border. You can throw dirt at me, but I think that there should be at least three such ships - two in exchange for one, and one in repair, for it’s not a bad idea to kill equipment. At the same time, the guard is limited in range, but not in armament - here go adversaries!
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. +7
        6 November 2014 10: 38
        COURTS

        Ships in the hospital wink
        1. Pervusha Isaev
          -4
          6 November 2014 10: 49
          Quote: Wiruz
          COURTS

          Ships in the hospital wink

          SHIP - ancient Russian word means ship, but of course it is who met with what in life ...
          1. +5
            6 November 2014 11: 30
            Combat SHIP can not be by ship! The ship may be a Navy Support Ship, or civil ... see Naval Charter of the Navy!
            1. Pervusha Isaev
              -6
              6 November 2014 11: 47
              Quote: FREGATENKAPITAN
              Combat SHIP can not be by ship! The ship may be a Navy Support Ship, or civil ... see Naval Charter of the Navy!

              Is this what is written directly in the charter? That the ship is not a ship? do not invent ...
              1. 0
                6 November 2014 15: 00
                the courts are called civilian ships, and the military are called ships.
                it's like sailors do not swim but go.
        2. 0
          6 November 2014 14: 33
          Ships in the hospital ...

          In the hospital - "ship" or "ship" (plural) ... IMHO. And the ships are the civilian fleet and auxiliary ships of the Navy. Hydrographic, scientific, supplies.
          And combat is called ships. So Perusha Isaev is wrong, but there is no need to gloat over this matter, and ... persist in delusion too. More polite to each other, comrades ... smile smile
      3. +4
        6 November 2014 10: 42
        Pervusha Isaev ...... are we building watchdogs? and when are we going to make OCEAN SHIPS that could step on the eggs by pin_dos?

        Our military doctrine for today: - protection and defense of the country from external threats.
      4. +4
        6 November 2014 10: 50
        These frigates have a range comparable to Arly Burke. It’s quite an ocean ship.
      5. 0
        6 November 2014 10: 59
        Healthy ships take much longer to build than small ones - and our shipyards are not infinite. Therefore, first you need to close all the gaps in the naval defense (in addition, the blood of shipbuilders will accelerate - new specialists will appear, new equipment, some experience on patrol boats will be gained. Maybe even now they will start to build some new shipyard), and then build ocean-going ships (in our country some frigates and destroyers "Leader" claim their role). And now we have submarines and modernized aircraft carriers playing the role of attacking American eggs.
      6. +1
        6 November 2014 12: 11
        Quote: Pervusha Isaev
        do we build everything? and when do we start making OCEAN VESSELS, which could come pin_dosam on eggs?

        Does the name of the ship "Admiral Nakhimov" mean anything to you? To sprinkle saliva, provokatorov. On the modernization of Nakhimov, there was also a similar article on VO - "We are throwing billions into an unnecessary giant! Another cut of money! We need to build watchdogs, and not suffer from gigantomania !!!"
        When will you all get away, Pyatokolonovtsi?
        1. +1
          6 November 2014 12: 14
          Quote: Manul
          Does the name of the ship "Admiral Nakhimov" mean anything to you? To sprinkle saliva, provokatorov. On the modernization of Nakhimov, there was also a similar article on VO - "We are throwing billions into an unnecessary giant! Another cut of money! We need to build watchdogs, and not suffer from gigantomania !!!"
          When will you all get away, Pyatokolonovtsi?

          I strongly disagree with you. We need ships from both the coastline and the ocean zone. So that our friends and our other "friends" do not forget that there is a powerful state called the Russian Federation (Raging Russian Empire))))
          1. 0
            6 November 2014 12: 44
            Quote: PROXOR
            I strongly disagree with you. We need ships from both the coastline and the ocean zone. So that our friends and our other "friends" do not forget that there is a powerful state called the Russian Federation (Raging Russian Empire))))

            belay fool Where did you see that I am against ??? I am against people who are - AGAINST! There will be an article about a heavy bomber - they will say it is too heavy. They will say too light about a light fighter, Mistral - the pelvis, nothing will fit into the MDK, the nuclear reactor is bulky, you will not get enough fuel for the gas turbine engine and so on. I’m Nakhimova as an example cited. And I am very pleased with the process of its revival! And you read carefully before drawing conclusions.
        2. Pervusha Isaev
          0
          6 November 2014 12: 26
          Quote: Manul
          And the name of the ship "Admiral Nakhimov" does not mean anything to you


          "Admiral Nakhimov" is a ship of the USSR.
          Quote: Manul
          Bucking billions into an unnecessary giant to anyone! Another cut of money


          a large battleship can attack an aircraft carrier group on FAR approaches, as for the "cut", the order in the country is a matter of the prosecutor's office ...
          1. -1
            6 November 2014 12: 45
            Quote: Pervusha Isaev
            "Admiral Nakhimov" is a ship of the USSR.

            Read at your leisure (with all the comments), so as not to write rash posts.
            http://topwar.ru/29518-modernizaciya-kreysera-admiral-nahimov-kontrakt-podpisan.

            html
      7. 0
        6 November 2014 13: 04
        Quote: Pervusha Isaev
        do we build everything? and when do we start making OCEAN VESSELS, which could come pin_dosam on eggs?

        ----------------------
        And e such a misse, Mikolaev is nicknamed, did you smell chi ni? The axis there was taco under the Union ...
      8. 0
        6 November 2014 14: 59
        22350 are ships of the ocean zone.
      9. 0
        6 November 2014 16: 45
        ships of the first rank without vessels of protection and support it is just ridiculous to even say no hunting request
    5. +2
      6 November 2014 12: 23
      Great news, you don’t have to wait 2020 for laying the Leader destroyer, but develop on the basis of the project 22350 destroyer for 7000 tons, 22350 have 32 air defense missiles and 16 UKKS, add 16 air defense missiles and another helicopter to the destroyer, thanks to the unifications with 22350 the ship will quickly go in a series.
  2. +3
    6 November 2014 10: 16
    And soon in order! Good luck!
  3. avt
    +1
    6 November 2014 10: 18
    The second is the exit. I said exit! laughing good
    Quote: alekc73
    Seven feet under the keel!!!

    Exactly ! What about the rest of the turbines? It was possible to pull out ready and paid from Nikolaev ??? However, worries - suddenly the series will be incomplete?
    1. 0
      6 November 2014 12: 06
      They’ll finish the construction, only the terms will be dragged out decently.
    2. +5
      6 November 2014 12: 07
      And here is the last quality photo of the ship.
  4. +6
    6 November 2014 10: 19
    News about the laying of ships almost every week. Harnessed for a long time ..
  5. +5
    6 November 2014 10: 19
    Something about us, as in the good old days, began to coincide with the holidays. Or did it seem to me? Although we have a holiday every day.
  6. 0
    6 November 2014 10: 20
    We can do it! drinks
  7. 0
    6 November 2014 10: 21
    Fine!!!
  8. 0
    6 November 2014 10: 22
    Quote: Funnels
    Something like in the good old days, began to coincide with the holidays.

    Better horseradish than nichrome.
    Listen how healthy he is, boat!
  9. +16
    6 November 2014 10: 22
    Much remains to be done to revive Crimea as Russia's main base on the Black Sea! But as they say: - "Dashing trouble is the beginning!" The beginning is done and what a !!!
  10. +2
    6 November 2014 10: 25
    The Black Sea Fleet is once again becoming a formidable force. NATO ships will be less and less comfortable entering the Black Sea. Plus coastal complexes and aviation in the Crimea is a force. good
  11. +6
    6 November 2014 10: 27
    Project 1135 is one of the most beautiful ships in the fleet. I have always admired its proportions and capabilities. And although in the article he is called disparagingly "patrol", this is a fairly large ship. Previously, he was even in the rank of BOD. And for the border guards, this project is generally in the role of a flagship. Good luck to the shipbuilders. Glory to the Russian Fleet !!!
  12. +2
    6 November 2014 10: 28
    Russia confirms the title of Great Sea Power, although there is still a lot of work.
  13. +4
    6 November 2014 10: 29
    We look forward to your soon arrival in Sevastopol!
  14. +1
    6 November 2014 10: 30
    Good news, the size is impressive and pleasing.
    The series is not bad, so we’ll get to the destroyers!
  15. +1
    6 November 2014 10: 31
    I hope that soon the frigates of project 22350 will be built at Yantar, as soon as 11356 are completed. There are a lot of fleets, few frigates, and 22350 is more likely not a frigate, but a lesser destroyer good
    1. +1
      6 November 2014 11: 36
      In terms of displacement and cruising range, it’s quite a coastal frigate
      1. +2
        6 November 2014 13: 41
        The range of 22350 is greater than that of BOD 1155 or EM 956 so that you know, and displacement is not the most important sign by which ships are classified wink
  16. +2
    6 November 2014 10: 32
    "We can't, but We can!"
    1. +2
      6 November 2014 11: 04
      What kind of ignoramus has minus me? This is a quote by Bykov from "Only old men go to battle" .....
  17. +1
    6 November 2014 10: 33
    And what about the air defense system? "Calm-1" and left? Have you changed to Redoubt? And that is not enough 50 km.
    1. +1
      6 November 2014 11: 01
      And what about the air defense system? "Calm-1" and left? Have you changed to Redoubt? And that is not enough 50 km
      I think that even "Redoubt" with its maximum speed of 150 km will also be not enough, if we consider that the harpoon hits 280, that is, the enemy aircraft will launch even before entering the air defense zone of the ship. this is not good
      1. +1
        6 November 2014 11: 04
        The patrol ship (frigate) of project 11356 was developed by OJSC Northern Design Bureau. Designed for warfare in oceanic and marine areas against surface ships and submarines of the enemy, repel attacks of air attack means. The frigates of this project are equipped with the Kashtan anti-aircraft missile and artillery system, eight Igla MANPADS, the A-190E installation, the Shtil-1 anti-aircraft missile system, and also torpedo tubes. Displacement - 4 tons. Case length - 000 meters.
        So comrades no p
        "Reduta" unfortunately crying
    2. +1
      6 November 2014 11: 33
      This is a frigate, and there is still no Calm there (the first firing was not earlier than the spring of 2015).

      The desire to stuff everything all at once is the eternal scourge of the Navy, from which the whole fleet as a whole suffers. For it is all at once, expressed plainly not working, terribly expensive unfinished building.

      For example, 20380 with Redoubt, which cannot work normally due to the lack of a normal radar, and Furke was not originally planned to be paired with Redut, hence the work on 2 crutches was successful shooting at simple targets on the 3 ship for all time. 0 of potential customers, even Algeria abandoned 20380 - although at a certain stage he considered it as part of the future fleet.
  18. Crang
    +1
    6 November 2014 10: 33
    Let them build more. Of course frigates like "Admiral Makarov" are not as cool as the newest frigates like "Admiral Kasatonov", but also very much nothing.
  19. 0
    6 November 2014 10: 35
    Still, from the heels of "Scorpions" to build and send them ... measure the depths and currents in the Gulf of Mexico laughing
  20. +4
    6 November 2014 10: 38
    Good news, if you do not remember about more than 70 destroyers from sworn partners.
    1. +1
      6 November 2014 11: 38
      AND? They’ve got the Navy’s budget - 148 billion dollars for the year alone, only direct budget expenditures (also 50-60 lard bypasses, which upon the Navy are all sorts of grants, R&D financing, logistics orders, etc.). This is more than the annual budget for the entire defense industry in Russia.

      And there was a time when they only spent more on the fleet than the TOP 5 countries on the entire defense industry as a whole.
      1. Crang
        0
        6 November 2014 13: 13
        Nothing. Domestic technology has always been famous for its unpretentiousness. We will supply the engine from ZAZ-968M for now. Will pull. And then we’ll start making our own turbines.
  21. ADK57
    0
    6 November 2014 10: 44
    Quote: ODERVIT
    Russia confirms the title of Great Sea Power, although there is still a lot of work.

    Confirm if it establishes large-scale production of turbines. To fulfill our export obligations, we had to take turbines from NZ.
    With a light hand of Chubais and Chubais, turbine production was concentrated in Ukraine.

    T ..., not a vice, but a great disgust.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. 0
    6 November 2014 11: 00
    In fact, the Black Sea Fleet has always been Mediterranean. And there you must constantly keep 1-2 KUG. So it's time to build destroyers URO, frigates of the ocean zone and DL multi-purpose.
  24. +1
    6 November 2014 11: 01
    http://youtu.be/cclyq-l4SZg
    Here you have the escort ship ... See to the end))))
  25. +5
    6 November 2014 11: 12
    This is project 1135.6, shoveled from the old, good watchman of project 11351 at the end of the seventies of the last century. In general, they were designed on their knees on an initiative basis at the Northern Design Bureau for India. But for lack of anything more modern, I had to sculpt for myself. there is no breakthrough and super modern in this project and its inclusion in the rearmament program is rather a necessary measure.
    1. 0
      6 November 2014 11: 31
      Crawfish and fish are cancerless. The surface fleet is in a terrible state. Let these honored veterans serve in excellent condition than to drive tired Moscow along two seas. And there in 5-10 years new ones will arrive.
      1. +1
        6 November 2014 12: 00
        I’m only in favor when they were built for the Indians in Kaliningrad, there weren’t enough shipbuilders, the welders were brought in on a rotational basis from Nikolaev and Kherson, they were accommodated in hotels, in fact, the Indians then saved the plant.
        1. 0
          6 November 2014 13: 04
          Quote: PRUSSAC
          I’m only in favor when they were built for the Indians in Kaliningrad, there weren’t enough shipbuilders, the welders were brought in on a rotational basis from Nikolaev and Kherson, they were accommodated in hotels, in fact, the Indians then saved the plant.

          Counter offer, write so that it is clear.
  26. -1
    6 November 2014 11: 14
    that they didn’t lay Admiral Kolchak, but everyone was brave and blushed the hero of Russia to perpetuate but no bed forbade.
    1. 0
      6 November 2014 12: 18
      everything has its time ... it makes sense to lay if there is a problem with the engines? as they decide to lay. sometimes it’s worth turning on the brain it’s useful
  27. 0
    6 November 2014 13: 14
    Normal ship. It’s not a weapon that fights, but people. Put modern weapons and prices he will not be in the near zone.
    1. 0
      6 November 2014 13: 55
      There is quite modern ..

      Armament: 8 anti-ship missiles "Klub-N", 1 100-mm universal AU A-190E, 1 PU SAM M-22 "Uragan" (export designation - "Calm") - 24 missiles, 2 ZRAK 3M87 "Dirk" (export designation "Kashtan"), 8 MANPADS "Igla", 2 x 2 533-mm TA DTA-53-11356-2, 1 x 12 RBU-6000, 2 anti-jamming launchers PK-2
  28. 0
    6 November 2014 13: 28
    Quote: Tiksi-3
    and who will tell ..... are there turbines for all the series? ... or only three pieces?

    Quote: indiggo
    everything has its time ... it makes sense to lay if there is a problem with the engines? as they decide to lay. sometimes it’s worth turning on the brain it’s useful

    I'm also very interested: so what is the result with the turbines for the rest? who knows, info in studio pzhl ...