Information for reflection. Retaliation weapons

45

Russia has the only one in the world weaponsguaranteeing a nuclear retaliatory strike against the enemy, even in that dreadful situation, if we already have no one to make a decision about this strike. The unique system counterattacks automatically - and cruelly.


Imagine the worst option. The world, balancing on the very brink of war, collapsed. The patience of the “Western democracies” was exhausted, and a preemptive nuclear strike was launched on the territory of the Soviet Union. Deadly missiles launched from mine launchers, from submarines and aircraft. The power of many thousands of warheads has fallen on cities and military facilities. And while the Soviet leadership, in shock and panic, figured out what had happened, if it was not a mistake, and how to remedy the situation — there was nothing to correct. Major megacities, industrial and military centers, command and communication centers were destroyed in one massive blow. The mighty nuclear arsenal of the USSR simply did not have time to use: the team did not enter, and in the absence of a leading center, the dangerous rival is blind, he is still.



But at the very moment when NATO generals raise their glasses of victory, something unimaginable happens. The silence seemed forever as if the enemy had come to life. Thousands of missiles rushed towards the western countries - and the generals did not have time to finish off a bottle of champagne, many of them, having broken through the built antimissile defense with such efforts, wiped out large cities, military bases, command centers. No one won.

That is how the Perimeter system worked, which received in the Western press the chilling name of The Dead Hand, the last argument of the Soviet (and now the Russian) state. Despite the large number and variety of doomsday machines doomed by science fiction writers, guaranteeing retribution to any enemy and capable of obtaining and guaranteed to destroy it, only the Perimeter, apparently, really exists.

However, “Perimeter” is a system that is kept in such a strict secret that there are some doubts about its existence, and all information about its composition and functions should be taken with a great deal of doubt. So what is known?

The Perimeter system launches an automatic massive nuclear strike. It guarantees the launch of underwater, airborne and silo-based ballistic missiles in the event that the enemy destroys ALL the points capable of giving an order for a retaliatory attack. It is completely independent of the remaining communications and command systems, even from the notorious “nuclear suitcase” of the Kazbek system.

The system was put on combat duty at 1985, and five years later it was modernized, called Perimeter RC, and served 5 more years. Then, as part of the START-1 agreement, she was removed from duty — and her current state is unknown. According to some data, it can be “turned on” again after START-1 expires (this will happen in December of 2009), and according to others, it has already returned to the current state.

It is believed that the system works like this. The "perimeter" is on permanent alert, it receives data from tracking systems, including the early warning radar of a missile attack. Apparently, the system has its own independent command posts, which are (externally) indistinguishable from the set of similar points of the Strategic Missile Forces. According to some reports, such items are 4 pieces, they are separated by a large distance and duplicate the functions of each other.

At these points, the most important — and the most secret — component of the “Perimeter”, an autonomous control-command system, operates. It is believed that this is a complex software package created on the basis of artificial intelligence. Receiving data on negotiations in the air, radiation field and other radiation in the control points, information systems, early detection of launches, seismic activity, it is able to draw conclusions about the fact of a massive nuclear attack.

If the "situation is overdue," the system itself is translated into a state of full combat readiness. Now she needs the last factor: the lack of regular signals from the usual command posts of the Strategic Missile Forces. If the signals are not received for some time - "Perimeter" starts the Apocalypse.

15A11 command rockets are launched from mines. Created on the basis of intercontinental missiles MP UR-100 (starting mass 71 t, flight range to 11 thousand km, two stages, liquid-jet engine), they carry a special head part. It is harmless in itself: it is a radio engineering system developed at the St. Petersburg Polytechnic. These missiles, rising high in the atmosphere, flying over the territory of the country, broadcast launch codes for all nuclear missiles.

Those act also automatically. Imagine a submarine standing at the pier: almost the entire crew on the shore has already died, and only a few confused watchmen on board. Suddenly she comes to life. Without any outside intervention, having received a start signal from strictly secret receiving devices, the nuclear arsenal is set in motion. The same thing happens in immobilized mine installations, and in strategic aviation. A retaliatory strike is inevitable: it is probably unnecessary to add that the Perimeter is designed to be especially resistant to all the damaging factors of nuclear weapons. Reliably
disable it almost impossible.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. raf
    +1
    12 August 2011 07: 46
    The main thing is that this "perimeter" does not hiccup, and does not start a war by mistake!
  2. 0
    12 August 2011 09: 38
    I could be wrong, but it seemed like somewhere infa flashed that "Perimeter" ordered to live long. Of course I would like to be mistaken ...
  3. Owl
    -2
    12 August 2011 11: 14
    This system is removed from combat duty ...
    1. +1
      11 September 2012 17: 01
      With a fright, modernized - yes, but no one was shooting.
  4. 0
    12 August 2011 12: 15
    Owl, This system has been removed from combat duty ...--- IF SO IT'S IN Vain.
  5. Max
    Max
    0
    12 August 2011 14: 19
    This complex has undergone a number of modernizations and in fact it is a completely different system, which is in a * frozen * state. In cases of confrontation and the realization that war is inevitable, the highest authorities of the country decide * to revitalize the system *. I want to note that the probability of the applicability of this complex is negligible in view of the duplication of powers in the hierarchical structure of the country's leadership.
  6. +6
    12 August 2011 14: 44
    Owl, This system is removed from combat duty ...- Her Perdyukov probably changed to furniture ...
    1. +2
      25 May 2012 19: 09
      The system has been functioning again since 2009! When the START-1 treaty ended!
      1. +1
        13 June 2012 14: 29
        Something felt better on my soul ...
  7. Captain
    -1
    12 August 2011 17: 56
    "Perimeter" is not Skynet, it cannot start a war. The fact is that for the final decision on a retaliatory strike, this system still requires a living person
    1. +3
      18 December 2011 10: 18
      Why does she need a man? If it is in the presence of certain parameters from control points, it launches. Not for the same, just to press a button. In this case, a 100% retaliation is not guaranteed, why then created this system?
  8. +7
    12 August 2011 19: 04
    They will never tell the truth about such things. And it is right.
  9. Dovmont
    +1
    12 August 2011 19: 20
    This article has already been published in the Military Review. What is the need to duplicate it again?
  10. Ivan35
    0
    13 August 2011 22: 41
    If removed - then it's time to put it again

    And artificial intelligence is not needed here - you can always put a couple of living people on duty in an additional bunker - and I am sure if you have the above information (signals about enemy starts - attack - seismic explosions - lack of communication with the leadership), they will be able without AI to their "alive brain "come to the conclusion that something is wrong
  11. Patriot
    -5
    14 August 2011 10: 04
    I personally consider such a system extremely dangerous!
    You can’t trust AI control over nuclear weapons, but what if the system crashes or someone hacks it? what then?
    1. LESHA pancake
      +3
      14 August 2011 16: 11
      WELL LIKE PEOPLE WEAPON REWARDS THERE HAVE ANYTHING TO DO ANYTHING WANTING TO BEAUTIFUL THE ENEMY.
    2. Sanzyro
      +6
      7 September 2011 12: 05
      Such systems do not hack! Do not hack !!! For a number of technical reasons, watch the Hollywood movie less ...
    3. OVOD
      +2
      7 October 2011 00: 37
      It's dangerous to live now. In the meantime, there are Bushes, Reagans and other overweight "masters of the world" better not to go to bed - nightmares will torment you.
      And as for the security system - you need to know how many degrees of protection there are in order to just sit down at the PU and "zhahnut". While the systems developed by the USSR are in service, you can sleep well. While you can ...
    4. +2
      18 December 2011 10: 14
      First of all, this system is completely autonomous and I can not imagine how it is hacked. Secondly, in the absence of at least one of the indicators, for example, radiation at control points, there will be no launch. What is dangerous about this?
      1. dmitry98
        0
        26 January 2012 19: 21
        Quote: Cap-3 of the USSR

        First of all, this system is completely autonomous and I don’t imagine how it is hacked

        If it is COMPLETELY autonomous, then how does it receive the SIGNAL from "broadcast the launch codes for all nuclear missile weapons"?
    5. OLEG_14
      0
      19 March 2014 09: 39
      about "hacking" - big doubts, why on earth?
  12. Sanzyro
    +2
    7 September 2011 12: 17
    It looks like a bike. Hatches closing missile shafts on a submarine will automatically open ?? And the slabs covering the underground mines, weighing 200 tons, will also move to the side themselves ?? As you wish, but there is no such automation! She is simply not needed there !!!
    1. +2
      10 October 2011 20: 56
      Absolutely agree! The RPKSN has such automation that it is simply absent to bring the ship to the required depth, speed and control the trim and leveling systems. I'm already silent about air-based strategic nuclear forces! As for mine-based, I could admit, but in this matter is clearly incompetent.
      1. +3
        18 December 2011 10: 24
        And what, they open manually? Or does one of you know the device control panels in the Strategic Missile Forces? With the introduction of this system could provide anything. Since the main goal of the perimeter is to give a volley in the absence of a person. And you naively believe that the developers have missed such trifles?
  13. svvaulsh
    +4
    10 October 2011 21: 14
    Well, it doesn’t matter if there is! The main thing is that the Pindos think that they are and were afraid!
    And we "zhahn", be sure to "zhahn", ...... but then! (Ensign from "DMB")
    1. dmitry98
      0
      26 January 2012 19: 28
      They have a 100% analogue of Emergency Rocket Communications System since 1963
  14. xmmmm
    0
    1 November 2011 20: 07
    In any case, we won’t know anything until the dogs of war nevertheless break the chain. God forbid that they never break.
  15. Roman Patriot
    +1
    20 November 2011 16: 42
    My opinion is!
    If it’s declassified, it’s top secret to be under the stamp,
    nobody will ever reveal the most advanced developments, and if the perimeter is working now then it’s a little easier on the soul that retribution will come!
    And disputes that they can’t design so that the mines will automatically open, yes they can, damn it when they flew into space, and then open the mines!
  16. SAMEDOV SULEYMAN
    -2
    10 December 2011 01: 06
    Something does not converge and looks like a beautiful fairy tale. Each of us understands something in military technology, but I’m sure that no one has ever heard of this, and as the author claims in 1985, she was already on combat duty and, as I understand it, such defensive nuclear deterrence systems are not suitable for strategic offensive arms.
    1. 0
      18 December 2011 10: 30
      Make a discount on the fact that the author of the article hurts too much that he also does not know. And with such a system, a very limited number of people have access to it. And they are probably not from the talkers. So one can only guess.
      There is no smoke without fire, so most likely there is such a system.
  17. NickitaDembelnulsa
    +3
    17 December 2011 06: 33
    According to the statements of the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, Lieutenant General Sergey Karakaev, the Perimeter system exists and is on combat duty.
  18. +3
    17 December 2011 07: 29
    Itself cannot work. The signal for its activation is the destruction of all other missile launch points. Those. most likely some signal disappears that the launch point is alive, and the Perimeter triggers after some time.
    If this is true about the Perimeter, then it’s good, because soon I feel that they will take over our 1 / 3 world resources
  19. Vlad_i_mir
    -2
    21 December 2011 19: 39
    This "Perimeter" may be a fiction, oh it is a really horrible thing, "to frighten". NATO or anyone else will not want to verify its existence
  20. +4
    27 January 2012 15: 42
    Gorgeous ... I like ... I'm probably a psychopath ... winked
  21. Nickname
    +1
    31 January 2012 15: 05
    Even if it exists. I almost believe it.
    And after all of our disarmament reductions, do we have enough stupid rockets to make an apocalypse? And so they are at a minimum, but something will not work, something has been destroyed. And the Pindos never see Kuzkin’s mother
  22. PIZDEC82
    0
    6 February 2012 19: 17
    God forbid this system to work ...))) It will be a karachun by everyone ... not only to us and the Americans ... but to all living things ..)))) only 50 explosions are enough at the same time .. . and if "Perimert" works ... at least a few hundred ...
  23. VlaSer
    +1
    24 February 2012 22: 39
    One can expect such a system from Soviet designers (who have done so much for our Motherland). True, something does not converge with the UR-100 .. Although, most likely, this system also has its own military missiles, such as the R-36 ... As far as I know, it can autonomously take off (in the technical specifications it is written) from the affected area, pass through the nuclear cloud absolutely completely (thanks to the applied coating), reach the strategic line, having overcome all missile defense systems, destroy the enemy. And all this despite the fact that the rocket itself on CAM mechanisms =))))
  24. VlaSer
    0
    24 February 2012 23: 02
    But in general, the article is still a fairy tale.
    Yes, We have a similar system, but it is extremely far from what is written here ...
    At least because in the first place: It is impossible on the UR-100 with a payload of one and a half tons to put a radio transmitter capable of giving a signal to missiles that survived, because this requires a huge coverage area of ​​this transmitter, which cannot be accommodated in one and a half tons ...
    Secondly: there can’t be a fully automated system. This is utopia. And even if it appears in a hundred years, I doubt that they can solve the NT transition problem. One of the damaging factors of nuclear weapons is an Electromagnetic pulse., Which simply cuts down all automation at such a complex.

    The picture is of course pessimistic, but I repeat, we have a formidable weapon, the RS-36 "Voevoda" well, or according to the NATO classification SS-18 "Satan". In any case, God forbid to see the work of the "humane weapon of death" in action.
    1. +3
      11 March 2012 01: 21
      Control systems are not capable of that. Although I work in civilian life, I maintain and develop control systems for those. processes and I can absolutely authoritatively declare that there is nothing complicated in this, and with modern developments this can be realized once or twice. I mean analytics and control systems, and we have plenty of smart flying missiles. And for pulsed communication packets, a lot of energy is not needed, it all depends on the carrier frequency of the transmitting and receiving devices. Moreover, the transmission is from above - almost a satellite. IHMO.
    2. LAO
      LAO
      0
      11 August 2012 20: 55
      1. In the HF and VHF bands, radio communication is established from Belgorod Region. from the USA with a transmitter power of 50W.
      2. 30 years ago, there were already systems for countering EMP on radar. Now they are more perfect.
      3. I deal with some issues of industrial automation. At that time there was already the possibility of complete automation.
      The question is whether they really did it or just wanted it.
  25. penkoffsky2011
    0
    4 May 2012 15: 22
    The Perimeter system is, of course, and will be ...
  26. 0
    16 July 2012 13: 02
    Quote: SAMEDOV SULEYMAN
    and as I understand it

    are you capable
  27. werrax
    0
    17 July 2012 16: 37
    I think the main thing is that the very talk about the existence of such a system is terrifying for many potential enemies, so God forbid, of course, but you’ll see Kuzkin’s mother somehow ... Nikita Sergeevich rest in peace
  28. 0
    6 August 2012 17: 59
    This is something from the section "neither myself, nor people." Although, in fact, it is correct.
  29. LAO
    LAO
    0
    11 August 2012 20: 41
    I heard about this (similar) system from mine builders passing shafts for rocket mines in Kazakhstan. That was 10 years ago, and they passed the trunks much earlier!
    They also talked about submarines capable of automatically striking back even when the crew died.
    Unfortunately (or fortunately) there is no way to check, although theoretically such a system may exist.
  30. +1
    11 September 2012 17: 03
    What a strange article, exactly the same I read a month ago on a completely different resource. Most importantly, this article repeats that word for word. Yes, punctuation marks.
  31. Drappier
    0
    11 September 2012 17: 08
    Dead hand, that, somewhere I heard. Do not bring attacks as they say.
  32. Revenge
    0
    30 October 2012 21: 51
    Quote: and on strategic aviation
    How? Do airplanes need to be lifted into the air, or do I not understand something?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"