Pros and Cons of the Missile Battleship
ALMOST ON PLATONOV
Why did you need to move “Admiral Nakhimov” to the bulk pool? The fact is that on Sevmash there is no normal dry dock where it would be possible, by all the rules of ship repair science, to put a ship with a displacement of about 24 tons, 000 meters long, 251 meters wide and 28,5 meters draft. The filling pool is artificial the water area, into which previously built submarines were lowered into Sevmash. It can be drained, and then it turns into a platform where ships can be repaired and modernized. So it was, for example, with the heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser Admiral fleet Soviet Union Gorshkov ”, which, through the efforts of the Sevmash residents, was turned into the light aircraft carrier“ Vikramaditya ”of the Indian Navy.
But in order to get "Vikramadityu", "Admiral Nakhimov" or any other large ship in the bulk basin, you need to reduce, and quite significantly, its draft, since you want to carry it through the threshold of the harbor - a special hydraulic device that locks the entrance to the pool.
That is why pontoons are welded to the bottom of the ship, allowing the cruiser to be raised. At "Admiral Nakhimov", the pontoons of the starboard were first installed, and then on the port side. And only then it became possible to guide the ship into the bulk pool.
If we consider that the work on the modernization of TARK began in January of this year, it is easy to imagine how troublesome this undertaking, which in its plot more and more resembles the gloomy surrealism of Andrei Platonov's "The Pit". After all, it is absolutely clear to any unbiased person today that it will not be possible to transfer the Admiral Nakhimov fleet in 2018 year, as the leaders of the Navy and USC say. The deadline will be shifted over the 2020 year, and quite likely closer to the 2025 year. And this will inevitably entail additional costs and will create grounds for all sorts of corruption schemes, “cuts” and “kickbacks”.
Now they are referring to the fact that Sevmash gained a lot of experience during the modernization of Vikramaditya. It really is. But in this experience there are not only good sides, but also bad ones. The ship was delayed by delivery to the customer for five years, and the project was unprofitable for Russia, and the costs were repaid at the expense of Russian taxpayers.
Now it is preparing to enter the factory trials of the frigate "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Gorshkov" - the head project of 22350, which is under construction for eight years! And yet it’s not a fact that it will be handed over to the customer next year, since the tests may well reveal flaws, deficiencies, etc., not to mention weapons systems that have never been fired. That is why for four years to bring to mind such a much more complex ship, like the "Admiral Nakhimov", will not succeed.
CALCULATE ADVANTAGES AND MINUSES
I foresee the objections of the naval community, which loves large surface ships and strongly advocates for them. At first glance, her arguments sound convincing. They say that after modernization the Russian Navy will receive a powerful cruiser, which in the West is often classified as a “battle cruiser” (battlecruiser), and some Russian authors even speak of it as a “missile battleship”.
Indeed, the composition of the weapons of “Admiral Nakhimov”, which he can receive as a result of modernization, is impressive: the Onyx and Caliber-NK 80 missiles, which can hit not only sea, but also coastal targets at a distance of more than 1500 km (according to a number of sources - up to 2600 km), as well as about a hundred anti-aircraft missiles of the Poliment-Redut air defense system. This is without regard to the CIRC "Palash" or "shell", as well as anti-submarine missiles.
By the way, even before the modernization, the Admiral Nakhimov, as well as his younger brother Peter the Great, carried very serious missile weapons: the 20 PKR Granit, the 96 Assault Fort, the 40 Assault Wasp and the 20 PLUR The Waterfall "That is, 176 units of guided missile weapons, not counting the "dirks" and unguided RBU missiles.
Surely the newest 152-mm Coalition-F twin artillery or Armat 130-mm AU A-192M Armat and possibly 12-30-mm Duet automatic rifles will be part of the weapons of the modernized Admiral Nakhimov. Naturally, the ship will receive the most modern electronic equipment: automated combat control, communications, radar, sonar and electronic warfare. Helicopters will also be based on it. TARK will be a great command post for Russian Navy ships operating in remote areas of the World Ocean. Thanks to the nuclear power plant, the cruiser has an unlimited navigation area. In other words, in the aggregate of its capabilities, the Admiral Nakhimov will be second only to American nuclear aircraft carriers.
According to the official wording, the Admiral Nakhimov is intended to impart combat stability to fleet forces operating in remote areas of the seas and oceans, attacking aircraft carrier strike groups and destroying the antisubmarine forces of the enemy, nuclear submarines and surface ships, as well as providing convoys and airborne troops on crossing the sea and in landing areas. And now, obviously, this list should also include the delivery of high-precision strikes on coastal facilities, including government and military authorities, military bases and warehouses, strategic enterprises and infrastructure facilities. We will not forget such an aspect of naval activity as demonstration of the flag, that is, the country's military capabilities on the near and distant shores. Finally, TARK-type “Orlan”, to which the “Admiral Nakhimov” belongs, perform the function of super-armed yachts, on which the heads of state and government like to visit the fleets, and from which they often sound important provisions of the naval construction of the Russian Federation and its military doctrine. All Russian presidents were aboard the Peter the Great. And for Dmitry Medvedev, the ship was even driven into a semi-circular light from Severodvinsk to Vladivostok and back.
However, the question arises about the ability of the cruiser to perform in full the above tasks. Both in the west and in the east of Russia oppose a coalition of highly developed naval states. On their side is a significant superiority in surface ships with significant impact and defensive potential. And now, not in the foreseeable future, this situation in Russia will not be reversed. These same coalitions have powerful air forces trained to operate over the sea and against surface targets. The means of space and electronic reconnaissance will allow tracking the movements of the “missile battleship” in real time from the moment of separation from the wall and beyond. Therefore, no matter how powerful and good the “rocket battleship” is, it is doomed in wartime. And just can not perform the tasks assigned to him.
Opportunities for the demonstration of the flag in surface ships with nuclear power plants are quite limited. Under pressure from greens, not all ports are allowed into them. So, the same “Peter the Great” had difficulties even when visiting Cape Town in a friendly South Africa.
It is no coincidence that shipborne nuclear power plants have a rather limited “circulation”: they are expensive, their operation and maintenance require special conditions, which also leads to an increase in costs. AUU entrenched only on submarines, icebreakers and aircraft carriers, that is, on those ships to which they are urgently needed and give a fundamentally new quality. Thanks to the AEU, submarines can run for a long time underwater at high speed and carry powerful weapons. Nuclear installations allow icebreakers to destroy the most powerful ice. And on aircraft carriers, they produce unlimited amounts of steam for catapults, which increases the number of sorties from the decks of floating airfields and a half to two times compared with aircraft carriers equipped with conventional GEM. Possessing enormous power, nuclear power plants enable new-generation aircraft carriers to use advanced electromagnetic catapults.
But on cruisers and destroyers, nuclear power plants do not provide any particular advantages, except for an unlimited navigation area. Moreover, they can turn into a disaster, not a boon. If an enemy missile hits the reactor compartment, the ship and its crew will be doomed.
Returning to the theme of the demonstration of the flag, one cannot but admit that the “eagles” make an impression abroad not only on the military, but on the inhabitants. And in NATO countries, for example, the propaganda machine uses their appearance in the adjacent waters as a clear demonstration of the “Russian threat”. Thus, the growth of military spending in the North Atlantic Alliance is stimulated.
We must not forget also that the "Admiral Nakhimov" is a middle-aged ship. He entered the naval force in the 1988 year, that is, 26 years ago - during the heyday of the restructuring, when the quality of work at defense enterprises fell rapidly. True, the ship served not very active and short-lived. Already in the 1997 year, he was withdrawn from the operating structure of the Northern Fleet, and on August 14, the 1999 cruiser arrived at Sevmash "for repair and modernization". Two slightly older TARKs - “Admiral Ushakov” (formerly “Kirov”) and “Admiral Lazarev” (formerly “Frunze”), which were also previously planned to be modernized, due to poor technical condition, including their AEU, were disposed of. The technical condition of “Admiral Nakhimov” after 15 years of inactivity can hardly be considered brilliant.
We should not forget that Sevmash is the leading and today the only enterprise of the Russian shipbuilding industry for the construction of nuclear submarines. The modernization of “Admiral Nakhimov” will inevitably divert the currently scarce intellectual and labor reserves from the creation of nuclear-powered ships that are so necessary for the country and the fleet, that is, to slow down their rhythmic surrender. AND story with the aircraft carrier Vikramaditya this thesis confirms.
PRICE OF THE QUESTION
Two years ago, when the contract for “Admiral Nakhimov” was only being worked out, the price for the upcoming modernization was announced at USC. At that time, Anatoly Shlemov, the head of the state defense order department of the United Shipbuilding Corporation, said that TARK would need 50 billion rubles to repair, upgrade and re-equip TARK. According to him, “the cost of only restoring the ship exceeds 30 billion rubles, and taking into account the installation of new weapons, the upgrade will cost about 50 billion rubles.”
But this is only a rough outline. The final technical modernization project is not ready. It cannot be until the disassembly and unloading of outdated and outdated equipment from the ship’s hull is completed. This process will end only after the cruiser is placed in the bulk pool. And then, quite possibly, it turns out that 50 billion rubles. for the reconstruction of "Admiral Nakhimov" is not enough.
In other words, we are talking about a very rather big amount. For comparison, we note that the cost of measures for the import substitution of military products previously shipped from Ukraine (and these are ship gas turbine power plants, missile guidance systems, etc.) is estimated by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation at the same 50 billion rubles.
Note that since the announcement of Anatoly Shlemov’s data on the cost of upgrading the Admiral Nakhimov, two years have passed. Unfortunately, during this time, inflation in Russia has accelerated, oil prices have fallen, and with them the ruble. That is, we can now talk about about 60 billion rubles. on the restoration of the ship, the benefits of which are highly questionable. In this regard, it is worthwhile to listen to the words of the Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation Anton Siluanov, who said, speaking in the Federation Council: “A new armament program will be prepared now. Within the framework of this new armament program, we already want to revise the amount of resources spent to make it more realistic ... Now we simply cannot afford it and will work with the Ministry of Defense to determine the costs that the budget can finance ". In turn, President Vladimir Putin ordered to present the most balanced version of the resource support for the new state armaments program, which should fully take into account the tasks in the field of military construction and, at the same time, proceed from the country's financial and economic capabilities. It is completely obvious that the Bolivar of the Russian budget will not be able to withstand the burden of financing the modernization of the Admiral Nakhimov.
WHAT IS AN ALTERNATIVE?
It seems that the Russian naval commanders are too carried away with a demonstration of the Russian flag in the oceans. But the tasks of defense of their shores and measures to counter the aggression against our country clearly faded into the background. There is no need to go far for examples. Take the Gulf of Finland. The small, but well-balanced Finnish Navy, staffed including shock ships, today have an undeniable superiority over the forces of the once powerful Leningrad naval base, which now include only a few small anti-submarine ships of the 1331М project and about a dozen raid ships minesweepers.
The future of the Russian Navy will undoubtedly be determined not by “missile battleships”, but by nuclear and non-nuclear submarines, frigates of projects 22350 and 11356P / M, corvettes of projects 22385 and 22386, as well as small missile ships of project 21631. They are armed with the same “calibers” but they will be able to strike more efficiently, since they can be hidden under water, dispersed over different water areas and covered with coastal air aviation. The fleet urgently needs a new generation of mine ships, as well as missile boats to protect the interests of Russia not somewhere in the unknown seas, but near its shore.
And what about the "Admiral Nakhimov"? It is good that the ship was transferred to the Sevmash bulk basin. There it can be disassembled into metal.
Information