British military scared of Russian "Shark"

13


The British Navy discovered the Russian nuclear-powered submarine Shark spying on them, reports the Daily Telegraph, citing an unnamed source in the command of the British fleet. According to a newspaper source, a Russian submarine tried to record the acoustic signal of the Vanguard nuclear submarine.

Shark was spotted near the Royal Fleet base in Scotland, Faslain, when it was expecting a Vanguard capable of carrying Trident D4 nuclear missiles. At the same time, the British military sounded the alarm and an anti-submarine of the Trafalgar class was sent to intercept a Russian submarine.

British Navy officials say that if the Shark managed to record the unique noise of the Vanguard engine, it would give her the potential to sink the British submarine before she launches defensive rockets, and the country's national security would be in jeopardy.

This incident occurred six months ago, but so far the incident has not been disclosed. As the newspaper notes, the British military complain that a record number of cases of contact with Russian submarines has now been recorded with 1987.

“The Russians in the North Atlantic are playing with us, the Americans and the French. We spent a lot of resources to protect the Trident missiles, because we should never allow the Russians to know the acoustic characteristics of one of our top bombers. This will put our means of deterrence at risk "- explained one of the commanders of the British Navy.

The submarines of the 971 Shchuka-B project (NATO designation - Akula) are a series of Russian multi-purpose third-generation nuclear submarines designed according to the same technical specifications as the titanium boats of the 945 Barracuda project, but with a steel hull.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    13 August 2011 10: 05
    Strange, to conduct reconnaissance with such a boat, it’s a missile carrier.
    1. Russian-Ukrainian
      +2
      13 August 2011 11: 53
      confuse the two projects-941 and 971
  2. cabin boy
    0
    13 August 2011 11: 11
    On the photo SSBN pr. 941, the article says "Project 971 Pike-B submarines (NATO designation - Akula)".
    Dear moderators, please correct.
    1. 0
      13 August 2011 11: 16
      But for sure - project 971 "Pike-B"
  3. 0
    13 August 2011 12: 17
    Here is project 941.
    http://topwar.ru/448-atomnaya-podvodnaya-lodka-s-ballisticheskimi-raketami-proek
    t-941-akulanato-typhon.html
  4. 0
    13 August 2011 12: 22
    Here are 941 projects
  5. 0
    13 August 2011 12: 26
    here is project 941
    1. remez
      0
      13 August 2011 18: 59
      beautiful Seva)))
  6. keng
    +3
    13 August 2011 12: 32
    No matter how the gentlemen from ANTANTA smiled at us - however, they are preparing for war with us and are afraid of us.
  7. +3
    13 August 2011 13: 06
    reconnaissance one after another is common practice. NATO members graze here and we can’t.; ??
  8. zczczc
    +2
    13 August 2011 13: 32
    But I don’t understand, explain to me why, in order to record the noise of a submarine or a ship, you need to chase it / him in a huge submarine? Really it is impossible to put the boat at a distance, and spy to launch a small apparatus such as an advanced toy? After all, he doesn’t need anything in the acre of a microphone to complete the task itself ... Well, even a self-destruction system, if they spot it.

    But how much cheaper!
  9. 0
    13 August 2011 13: 48
    But the forbidden film about Kursk.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7760893092491624954#
  10. Ruslan
    0
    13 August 2011 14: 34
    In one of the films of the Strike Force series, they said that under the agreement with NATO, the Akula had no missiles. Let it be used as a scout, or else to the shore and under the cutter.
    1. 0
      13 August 2011 20: 22
      There are missiles, but it's easier for a cutter ... maybe they’ll load and launch idle for elections ... After all, what is needed? All in all, cooperation with Ukraine ...
  11. Roma
    +1
    13 August 2011 19: 50
    Yes, everything is already recorded. Let the snowstorm not be driven.
    Their national security is not worth a penny.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"