Military Review

Tatyana Poloskova. The disaster is near: the United States almost expelled BRICS from Latin America

65
Tatyana Poloskova. The disaster is near: the United States almost expelled BRICS from Latin America


The declaration on the presence of geopolitical interests of Russia in the former “US backyard” (in Latin America) is a clear sign of recent times. However, a marked increase in political and economic contacts between Russian authorities and the states of this region does not mean that the United States will voluntarily leave, and the entire population of Latin America welcomes rapprochement with Russia.

A benevolent attitude toward Russians, which the “Latinos” willingly and quite sincerely demonstrate, does not exclude the presence of sympathy for the United States, even in those countries of the region that we now call strategic partners. The naive dream “to live as they live in the States” - has not left the mass consciousness anywhere. Emigration to the USA or to Western Europe is still a criterion of success for a huge number of Latin Americans. And even Cuba is no exception. The system of training the political, economic, and military elite of most Latin American countries in US higher education institutions has been successfully and successfully operating, the influence of the North American mass culture on the population of the region is strong, the network of North American NGOs, funded by the Department of State for a long time, has been working effectively USA.

In Soviet times, our work on the formation of "reference points" and "groups of influence" in Latin America was built systematically and on a solid financial basis. Including due to the operation of enterprises and "friendly" banks directly in the region. The remains of this heritage can be observed in some places and now. For example, on the plantation mate in Argentina and Paraguay, which now belong to ex-friends of the Soviet Union. There were also more serious schemes that allowed financing the political activities of pro-Soviet organizations and influential personalities. But to remember that has long been a new owner, it makes no sense. Two-thirds of the Soviet cultural centers, which for various reasons were recorded on nominees, are now also private property. And to return it in most cases is unreal.

Until now, Associations of graduates of Soviet universities in Latin America are numerous and in some places are active. Students from the region are going to Russia now, albeit not so massively. But the Soviet system of training and forming a friendly elite in the countries of Latin America was much more effective and set itself the task of not only providing education, but also certain principles. Now, to restore such work in the region and create a real alternative to the influence of the United States, it takes years, people, means and political will. And for starters - we need the truth. The truth about the real situation in our friendly countries. For some reason, no one says that even in Cuba, to which we have written off a huge debt, there has long been an increase in sympathy for the United States, especially among young people. “Americans will come - there will be jeans, a chewing gum and a car” - Cubans of the older generation, our diplomats, told me about such moods in the youth environment. What is opposed to this? Perhaps something. But these efforts do not reach the bulk of the Cuban population. While the situation on the Island of Freedom is controlled by the authorities. But the mechanism of economic liberalization has been launched.

Another reality is that the leaders of the countries of the region, who have declared a strategic partnership with Russia, are experiencing severe pressure from the opposition, supported by the United States, and the constant threat of bias. Including due to the formation of public discontent with the socio-economic situation, the level of personal security, etc. As it has been happening for more than a year in Venezuela, in Argentina, in Brazil. And not only there.

Our initiatives in Latin America are tied to specific leaders. Yes, these leaders have different reasons for friendship with Russia, often quite pragmatic. But they are our allies. However, while we rejoiced at the "strengthening of our influence" in the "backyard" of the United States, Washington sharply stepped up its long-standing "game" to dislodge the leaders of the countries "lit up" overly sympathetic to Moscow. Unresolved external debt problems, a drop in the living standards of Argentines, a noticeable decline in the popularity of the country's current president, Christina Kirchner, may well lead to the opposition winning the 2015 presidential election of the year. And then our joint plans, including economic rapprochement, will collapse. And the widely advertised cross year of Russian Culture in Argentina and Argentina in Russia will not save. A friend of our country, Christina Kirchner will be out of work.

The president of our strategic partner of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, in order to remove the social heat caused by the shortage of essential goods, went a few days ago to the adoption of a law that equates smuggling goods from the country to drug traffic. Nevertheless, the economic situation in Venezuela remains difficult, and the level of discontent among the population is high. Opposition leader Enrique Capriles, who does not hide the fact that he is supported by the US authorities, actively uses these difficulties. In the end, where the oil - there is blood. We want to keep "our" president in Caracas - something must be done. The office of the president of Venezuela is being consulted now, including on economic issues by Cuban experts. Why not ours?

The presidential election of 26 in October of 2014 in Brazil ended with the fact that the main BRICS locomotive in the Dilma Rousseff region passed with an extremely insignificant advantage - less than 3 percent. Moreover, in the industrialized regions of the country, its competitor won - a supporter of the North American vector of foreign policy A. Nevis. If D. Rousseff lost the election, Brazil’s participation in the BRICS could turn into a formality. October 26 held presidential elections in Uruguay. The Left Wide Front coalition has entered the second round, and this marathon will not be easy for them either.

Instead of declaring victorious reports: “We are ousting the United States from Latin America,” we must seriously think about how and how to support the allies in the region. A competitor D. Rousseff employed a large number of consultants from the United States in the elections in Brazil. Not from Russia. The state dialogue between Russia and Venezuela now, more than ever, needs the support of civil society. And enthusiasts are engaged in establishing connections. The huge and not poor Russian diaspora of Argentina is not at all involved in full measure as an instrument of sociopolitical and informational support for Russia. I do not mean festivals, Russian language courses, congress trips. I would like something more real. Especially in Argentina, as well as in neighboring Uruguay, where people from Russia are in fourth place in quantity, there is potential for this.

Latin American journalists and experts who support the dialogue with Russia, against the North American expansion should be known in our country. Their arguments should be voiced in the Russian media. They need to be broadcast. The permanent expert sites in Latin America with the participation of Russian specialists are needed. Civil society should join the dialogue of states. And after a while, not soon, but these efforts will have an effect.

PR campaigns and constant spells in the media that “Russia has returned to Latin America” and almost control the process actually disorient our population and mislead the country's leadership. As for the USA, they will not voluntarily leave Latin America. Even if politicians in power and enjoying the support of a large part of the population will point the door to them. The roots have grown too deep. But any roots can be uprooted during hard and proper work.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/1860400.html
65 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Same lech
    Same lech 29 October 2014 14: 28
    +12
    The president of our strategic partner of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, in order to remove the social tension caused by the shortage of essential goods, went a few days ago to adopt a law that makes the smuggling of goods from the country equal to drug trafficking. Nevertheless, the economic situation in Venezuela remains difficult, and the level of discontent among the population is high.


    RUSSIA is planning the same with the help of sanctions.
    1. Giant thought
      Giant thought 29 October 2014 14: 38
      +7
      The US’s confrontation with the rest of the world is not decreasing, but only increasing, and Russia is at the forefront in this confrontation.
      1. mirag2
        mirag2 29 October 2014 14: 45
        +4
        Here is a very interesting article about changes in the global economy and its impact on geopolitics from 1900 to the present.
        It is written competently and in an accessible language:
        http://regnum.ru/news/polit/1861228.html
        By 1950, the "world" was final. The size of world GDP is $ 7.555 billion. Including: the United States - $ 2.175 billion (28,7%); European Community - $ 2.225 billion (29,4%); USSR - $ 840 billion (11,1%). The rest of the world - $ 2.315 billion (30,6%).

        ps author: Alexander Zapolskis is an international expert.
      2. Момент
        Момент 29 October 2014 14: 46
        +2
        Now we need to develop the Russian institutions of friendship in all countries of Latin America and offer an alternative to color revolutions. Only in this way will we preserve what we seem to have won.
        1. user
          user 29 October 2014 19: 51
          0
          Now we need to develop Russian friendship institutions in all countries of Latin America and propose an alternative to color revolutions.


          Well, you can just revive the Comintern.
          At one time, Bourgeois wrote at his mention of kerosene. Its closure was at the cost of opening a second front.
          1. horseradish
            horseradish 30 October 2014 06: 26
            0
            are you not enough of the top-ranking Kolomoisky and Khodorkovsky? and why should the townspeople write kerosene from this?
        2. Kindof
          Kindof 29 October 2014 23: 51
          0
          The common field for cooperation with Latin Americans is football drinks

          It is necessary to invite a Latin American as a UNIVERSALLY ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE PROGRESSIVE BRICS COMMUNITY specialists in organizing, conducting, participating in the World Cup at the 2018 World Cup facilities as: contractors, consultants, playing coaches, doctors, etc.
          Collaboration in the construction of facilities and infrastructure, in the training of athletes and staff will bring together civil society and national characters clearly!
          Until 2019, partnerships will also hold partnerships.

          An additional effect of rapprochement will be given by the expected "stick-in-wheel-insertion" from the states in the "joint" Latin-Russian project of the 2018 World Cup.
          The effect will enhance the correct media coverage of the situation: the Brazilians, the same to you, were also prevented from holding the 2014 World Cup and winning - condemning the South American teams. Whose ears are sticking out?
      3. varov14
        varov14 29 October 2014 17: 46
        0
        “and Russia is on the front line in this confrontation.” ---- You should not be on the front line, but at the head, and this is not at all the same thing.
    2. Giant thought
      Giant thought 29 October 2014 14: 38
      0
      The US’s confrontation with the rest of the world is not decreasing, but only increasing, and Russia is at the forefront in this confrontation.
      1. jjj
        jjj 29 October 2014 15: 00
        +7
        It seems that Putin's people have a clear idea of ​​the balance of power in Latin America. Even in the medium term, we will not be able to seriously influence the minds of ordinary citizens of these countries. It is rightly said: "Jeans, gum, car" and most likely the coveted dollar own the mass mood there. That is why our presence in that region is rather only designated
        1. kodxnumx
          kodxnumx 29 October 2014 15: 57
          +1
          I would like to believe that the Kremlin understands this and will act in this vein, otherwise what can one hope for? Everything will not work out by itself.
        2. varov14
          varov14 29 October 2014 18: 11
          +2
          "Even in the medium term, we will not be able to have a serious impact on the minds of ordinary citizens of these countries" ---- We cannot influence the minds of our own citizens, who is in the forest, who for firewood. As long as those in power are both ours and yours, there will be no use; it is necessary to hit one point every hour and everywhere at all levels, i.e. we need an elementary ideology, any ism, for everyone and strictly obligatory, without deviators. Except for populism, which is now flourishing. Today's liberalism is anarchy, permissiveness and total disorder and irresponsibility.
        3. Lelek
          Lelek 30 October 2014 00: 32
          +1
          Quote: jjj
          Putin’s people clearly understand the balance of power in Latin America.


          Presenting the alignment is not enough. There is almost no propaganda of Russian positions on countries of another continent. We won’t broadcast to the principality of Kiev, there the bandelogs represent us in bast shoes, without panties and with horns on their heads and even riding bears. A powerful propaganda oh as needed. yes
    3. atalef
      atalef 29 October 2014 16: 00
      -10
      Quote: The same Lech
      The president of our strategic partner of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, in order to remove the social tension caused by the shortage of essential goods, went a few days ago to adopt a law that makes the smuggling of goods from the country equal to drug trafficking. Nevertheless, the economic situation in Venezuela remains difficult, and the level of discontent among the population is high.


      RUSSIA is planning the same with the help of sanctions.

      Only Venezuela is somehow not under sanctions and why is the situation there difficult, can someone explain to me?
      All oil belongs to the state, stocks are the first in the world. There are no sales at maximum Sanctions --- maybe the problem is in Mr. Maduro’s head?
      1. 97110
        97110 29 October 2014 17: 37
        +2
        Quote: atalef
        All oil belongs to the state,
        You yourself answered. And the undeclaredness of sanctions does not mean their absence. I doubt that Venezuelan state-owned enterprises have easy access to the capital market of the U.S. Etc. Confess that you like a little troll? Well, I do not believe that you are sincere. Rolled up a ball and pump energy from us?
        1. atalef
          atalef 30 October 2014 06: 37
          0
          Quote: 97110
          Quote: atalef
          All oil belongs to the state,
          You yourself answered. And the undeclaredness of sanctions does not mean their absence. I doubt that Venezuelan state-owned enterprises have easy access to the capital market of the U.S. Etc. Confess that you like a little troll? Well, I do not believe that you are sincere. Rolled up a ball and pump energy from us?

          Well yes, do you see a gopher? And he is laughing
          What kind of slave psychology? What, like if the US does not trade-- is that all? Is the USA the whole world? And where is multipolarity?
          There are no sanctions in Venezuela, in China she buys whatever she wants and how much she can (although she can’t do much with the current leadership) - all the grandmothers spent on supporting their friends as parasites, but how could it be otherwise - if socialism means feeding the hungry and poor - without it they don’t believe in bright ideas
          1. 97110
            97110 30 October 2014 20: 57
            0
            Quote: atalef
            What kind of slave psychology? What, like if the US does not trade-- is that all? Is the USA the whole world? And where is multipolarity?

            This is what you better know. Your people are great and how talented you are, we even have children of lawyers talking about this. And how much does your state weigh without the United States? With what pleasure the Arab woman will trample you as soon as the pin-dosam is not up to you. Have time to the historical homeland, where is slave psychology to run?
    4. subbtin.725
      subbtin.725 29 October 2014 16: 23
      0
      But any roots lend themselves to uprooting with hard and proper work.

      Our diplomats have to work very fruitfully for the good of the Motherland.
  2. Dbnfkmtdbx
    Dbnfkmtdbx 29 October 2014 14: 29
    -3
    Yes, let the states sit somewhere, even on the moon, people themselves sort out the Americans, so no friends, I sincerely regret them
  3. cerbuk6155
    cerbuk6155 29 October 2014 14: 32
    +15
    As long as PUTIN inside RUSSIA does not deal with the liberals who are ready to surrender RUSSIA, we will not be able to seriously support Latin America. soldier
    1. a52333
      a52333 29 October 2014 14: 42
      +2
      Quote: cerbuk6155
      we cannot do serious support for Latin America.

      Well yes. It’s easier for these goats, they turned on the machine, brought a couple of tons of green garbage, and the opposition (whether in Argentina or Vinzuela) and here, start barking and sniffing at the president.
      By the way: yesterday I was listening to <Moscow speaking>. Agvidor Eskin against the boron bone liberoid. According to the audience's vote, Eskin named Borovoy with a ratio of 71% versus 20%.
      1. Oldwiser
        Oldwiser 29 October 2014 15: 21
        +4
        One Jew argued over another Jew. And where is the benefit for Russia here?
        1. varov14
          varov14 29 October 2014 18: 29
          +2
          And here is another one: "Goyim go to power out of curiosity or in the hope of using it to get to the public pie, and some in order to be able to express their unrealizable and groundless
          Dreams: they crave the emotions of success and applause, for which we are very generous. We then gave them this success in order to take advantage of the birth of self-seduction, with which people imperceptibly perceive our suggestions, not beingware of them, in the full confidence that their infallibility releases its thoughts, and can no longer perceive strangers ...
          You cannot imagine how the cleverest of the goyim can lead to unconscious naivety, subject to self-seduction, and at the same time
          how easy it is to discourage them by the slightest failure, if only by the end of applause, and lead to slavish obedience for the sake of renewal
          success ... ".
          1. Kindof
            Kindof 29 October 2014 23: 55
            0
            The author in the studio!
        2. Stanislas
          Stanislas 30 October 2014 08: 32
          0
          Quote: OldWiser
          And where is the benefit for Russia here?
          Do you think that if one of the debaters were not Agvidor Eskin, but, say, Ivan Petrovich Sidorov, then there would be undoubted benefit for Russia?
    2. 97110
      97110 29 October 2014 17: 48
      -2
      Quote: cerbuk6155
      won't deal with liberals

      Chik-chik - take away the ready-made? What instead? Until another model of economic development is adopted, an analysis with the liberals = an analysis with the oligarchs in Ukraine. At the same time, it was not adopted by the State Duma and personally by the GDP, but by society, which in itself sounds strange. We do not like the liberals, the right word, liberals. Communists ..., no words, some expressions about the bloody gebnya. Saltykov-Shchedrin also has a wonderful theory of building a society, which ends with the words "... and instead of the sky, a gray soldier's overcoat is pulled ..." (from memory, I could be mistaken). That is, your philosophical thought about "sorting out" should be continued, who will be the beneficiary of the dismantling. Desirable with details on ownership of the means of production, relations with the world economy, etc. And in this form, it is a conversation in favor of the poor, i.e. about nothing.
  4. Prager
    Prager 29 October 2014 14: 33
    +6
    the main thing is to behave wisely, carefully and persistently pursuing your national interests. And do not forget to follow the mattresses - you can expect everything from these creatures.
    1. rf xnumx
      rf xnumx 29 October 2014 14: 37
      +8
      Quote: Prager
      you can expect everything from these creatures

      Of course they will stick sticks in the wheels - this is their essence
    2. Kindof
      Kindof 29 October 2014 23: 56
      0
      Vladimir Vladimirovich conveyed: "thanks for the valuable advice"
  5. Cossack Lee Hoy
    Cossack Lee Hoy 29 October 2014 14: 36
    +5
    So, by and large, normal work with Latin America has just begun, we were simply not there in hard times, the main thing is to increase momentum, and not only at the BRICS site.
  6. mark_rod
    mark_rod 29 October 2014 14: 38
    +7
    Good article! Indeed, in Russia there is some kind of hatred towards Latin America. You have to work there. Nothing will fall into your own hands! We need diplomats of a new formation, and not some Zurabovs out there who will kill any good undertaking in the bud ....
    1. Hagalaz
      Hagalaz 29 October 2014 15: 57
      +1
      Zurabov is not prof. diplomat like. He was built on this post.
      1. Victor Demchenko
        Victor Demchenko 29 October 2014 17: 51
        +1
        you can't even attach it to a broom! only serve a stick with a wet rag in a public toilet to wash your ass (the film "Spartacus" who does not remember) angry
  7. B.T.V.
    B.T.V. 29 October 2014 14: 38
    +1
    Americans hemp uproot with ammonium nitrate, can they, like hemp, also uproot this way ???
  8. Abbra
    Abbra 29 October 2014 14: 39
    +2
    The prosperous countries of Latin America are considered the "backyard" of the United States. In twenty years everything will be the other way around. And the States, pursuing such a policy, will turn out to be a dump for Latin America.
  9. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 29 October 2014 14: 40
    +3
    Here are the works of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs! There is no end ... And who said that it will be easy? You can’t take a fish out of the refrigerator without labor ... Yes, and the Russian business must be steadily oriented in that direction (to the Government of Russia this is also to the lawmakers!), Than besides business, should they be tied to us ???
  10. igordok
    igordok 29 October 2014 14: 42
    +1
    For some reason, there have been no coups d'etat in Latin America for a long time. Or "soft power" is in vogue now.
  11. gladysheff2010
    gladysheff2010 29 October 2014 14: 44
    +2
    Russia should not be left alone, and therefore it is necessary to support friendly politicians from any states - friendship also has a price. The questions raised by the author are both timely and correct in essence - an unambiguous "+" article.
  12. Abbra
    Abbra 29 October 2014 14: 48
    0
    In place of the prosperous countries of Latin America, I would do such a thing: send all sorts of idiots to the States. Under any pretext.
  13. andrew42
    andrew42 29 October 2014 14: 49
    +4
    Sadly, but the sympathy of the population of Latin America for the "American way of life" is associated primarily with consumer goods, secondly, with media and film production, with advertising this "way of life", falsely asserting accessibility for all (on in fact - for units). And with the first, and with the second in Russia, everything is NOT GOOD (I will not say that it is bad). The common population of a separate Latin American country will not see the advantages of any joint gas / oil / military-industrial project, and most likely will not feel it, or will feel it in years, and will not identify it. Everyone wants to live well here and now, and American propaganda falls on the soil of national consciousness weakened by erosion. Therefore, the possibilities of Russia in L.A. more than limited. Indeed, the only method that can be used is the expansion of cultural and informational contacts. This should accompany any joint international business project, advertising and pulling everything in the ears. The question is whether Russia will have the means at least for this.
    1. atalef
      atalef 29 October 2014 16: 04
      0
      Quote: andrew42
      Sadly, but the sympathy of the population of Latin America for the "American way of life" is associated primarily with consumer goods, secondly, with media and film production, with advertising this "way of life", falsely asserting accessibility for all (on in fact - for units).

      Listen to this. don't tell tales
      In America, there are more than 15 million Latinos only illegal immigrants and they have an excellent relationship with their native countries - it would be bad, their relatives and friends would not rush into the States in such a flood. that only at the border they catch one million a year.
      In the States it’s really better - that's why they run to them
  14. galantmen1980
    galantmen1980 29 October 2014 15: 00
    +3
    it’s possible to get down to the level of ordinary people only after our agents of influence have worked in Latin America for a long time and only in the right direction - the timing may vary but in general it is from 5 to 10 years - and at this time the main issue for everyone is the economy - which subsequently pulls everything and covert cooperation, including - therefore, for today, work is just beginning and talking and even more so waiting for quick positive results is not serious - another issue of the enemy’s action, which did not stop its work but is somewhat surprised if it is not overwhelmed by our move to its garden, is also activated in First of all, by economic methods - the dice that he will throw can predetermine a lot of things in the oegion and the main thing for us is not to waste huge amounts of money as it was during the scoop, therefore the gdp thinks and is in no hurry to enter here because it may turn out to be a trap or turn into it ... not everything is as simple as you want but ace is possible ... and most importantly vvp he is a big fan of nestand artifices - and possibly non-standard approaches both in the form of a local conflict and in destabilizing the region in another way - by indirect methods ...
  15. WIN969
    WIN969 29 October 2014 15: 05
    0
    Poloskova? I hear it for the first time.
  16. hard
    hard 29 October 2014 15: 08
    +1
    Quote: Prager
    the main thing is to behave wisely, carefully and persistently pursuing your national interests. And do not forget to follow the mattresses - you can expect everything from these creatures.

    Right! Step by step. A hen pecking a grain.
  17. ODERVIT
    ODERVIT 29 October 2014 15: 28
    +1
    I agree with the author as a whole. Latin America is a very important and promising region of the world and has been working there for decades to achieve its geopolitical interests. But that's what I thought about with difficulty, but Dilma won the election, both Christina and Nicholas hold on. Who knows, maybe this is already the support of our country. The game is complex and multifaceted, but I think it has begun ......
  18. tanit
    tanit 29 October 2014 15: 32
    0
    Rats remember (or think) about Master Goffam (I will not replace, even though Lemonov) - as everything was (will not) actually
  19. mivmim
    mivmim 29 October 2014 15: 35
    +4
    Here Obama cries bitterly.
    He wanted to play the ball,
    Only Putin (war howl)
    Does not give the whole globe of the earth,
    Obama takes away, From Ukraine erases the dirt.
    Then Obama sobbed. He ran for help.
    Here the six jumped and screamed at Vova:
    “Why are you hitting Obama? Do not give a ball in your hands?
    Erasing blue from the ball And do not respect Bander?
    Right now give the ball to Obama! ” And stomped her feet:
    “You cannot mind us! You and I are now enemies! ”
    Vova waited a little, and then he said like this:
    "Your friendship is not needed - two kopecks are worth it.
    I won’t give the ball, at least dine, Although you all cling to me.
    So far I have not touched any of you, and slightly.
    But I don’t need to be angry: I can bite.
    You played enough, And trampled on the borders,
    Smeared with blood and mud, Flooded with different scum,
    Stumbled rockets, That is not visible white light.
    No, you don’t think so! God will not leave Russia!
    I will wash the globe of the earth; Who is the world? Come with me ..
    1. Kindof
      Kindof 30 October 2014 00: 00
      0
      Class! Very cute!
      Agniya Barto?
  20. Starmos
    Starmos 29 October 2014 15: 38
    +2
    Quote: cerbuk6155
    As long as PUTIN inside RUSSIA does not deal with the liberals who are ready to surrender RUSSIA, we will not be able to seriously support Latin America. soldier

    Yes, we’ll just lose Russia. No, let the liberal oligarchs part with power and money, but Russia should be!
  21. pts-m
    pts-m 29 October 2014 15: 51
    +1
    it takes time for everything. overnight, nothing can be done but to blame external enemies. We need to work, and at work time will pass by quickly.
  22. ochakow703
    ochakow703 29 October 2014 16: 03
    +2
    We need to act around the world, otherwise Americans everywhere will mark the territory. This bastard folk is sleeping and sees the whole world hobble on them. And you need to act aggressively. It’s necessary, and that’s it!
  23. Hagalaz
    Hagalaz 29 October 2014 16: 07
    0
    Say what you like, but the United States has deeply rooted its roots in the global economy and, above all, the minds of people. The world wakes up from hibernation of course. But I feel that without some kind of shake-up, it will not do so that everyone recognizes these parasites.
  24. 31rus
    31rus 29 October 2014 16: 08
    -1
    The article is not about anything, 1) Russia needs it just as we do in these countries, 2) no one was going to compete, especially economically with the USA, it's just crazy, Russia is gaining its own segment, 3) political economic influence on leaders these countries can be attributed to any country, 4) your statement about misleading the government is pure stupidity, 5) you should not try to regain the success of the USSR in Latin America, for the above reasons. The GVP has clearly indicated what Russia will do in the BRICS and in eternity with every country
  25. vdtomsk
    vdtomsk 29 October 2014 16: 17
    +1
    Quote: ochakow703
    We need to act around the world, otherwise Americans everywhere will mark the territory. This bastard folk is sleeping and sees the whole world hobble on them. And you need to act aggressively. It’s necessary, and that’s it!

    something like this:
  26. Zverboy
    Zverboy 29 October 2014 17: 19
    0
    American John Perkins wrote the book "Confessions of an economic killer", where he described in detail the technology of subjugation of the countries included in the American orbit of influence.
    therefore
    andrew42
    100% right when he writes:
    The common population of a single Latin American country will not see the advantages of any joint gas / oil / military-industrial project, and most likely it will not feel, or will feel in years, and does not identify. Everyone wants to live well here and now, and American propaganda falls on erosion-weakened soil of national self-awareness. Therefore, the possibilities of Russia in L.A. more than limited. Indeed, the only method that can be used is to expand cultural and information contacts. This should accompany any joint international business project, advertising and earning everything that is possible. The question is whether Russia has at least funds for this.
    1. Kindof
      Kindof 30 October 2014 00: 03
      0
      Football. 2018 World Cup
  27. Tamparu
    Tamparu 29 October 2014 17: 23
    +1
    Damn, everything that happens in South America is perfectly mirrored in our CIS countries !!!!
    The leadership of the Russian Federation EVERYWHERE flirts with some politicians, but forgets for the common people. It is because of this that he constantly receives "feeds" .... It seems that they are doing this on purpose .. hi
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 97110
      97110 29 October 2014 18: 00
      +1
      Quote: TampaRU
      The leadership of the Russian Federation flirts everywhere with some politicians, but for ordinary people forgets
      Just the opposite. Russia in the form of the USSR has always tried to work with the people. And pin-dos were bought by politicians. For a cap of crackers a whole country of cannon fodder, fed for Soviet money. Your irrepressible desire to attack the Government of the Russian Federation, its Parliament and the President personally cause rejection.
      1. Tamparu
        Tamparu 29 October 2014 19: 41
        +1
        Quote: 97110

        Quote: TampaRU
        The leadership of the Russian Federation flirts everywhere with some politicians, but for ordinary people forgets

        Just the opposite. Russia in the form of the USSR has always tried to work with the people. And pin-dos were bought by politicians. For a cap of crackers a whole country of cannon fodder, fed for Soviet money. Your irrepressible desire to attack the Government of the Russian Federation, its Parliament and the President personally cause rejection.


        Dear,
        I do not want, as you put it, to "poop" at the Parliament and the President personally, but ... You cannot argue against facts ... I, and you, I am sure, personally see this ... What I saw in Ukraine For the last 23 years, it says that there were constant attempts to flirt with the Ukrainian oligarchs in the form of all kinds of preferences, which were broadcast as a blessing for the people, but in fact it looked like a bribe so that they, the Ukrainian oligarchs, were in line with the pro-Russian vector. Okay, this is also, but they were constantly making mistakes, betting on the wrong one, because the leadership of the Russian Federation either did not want or pretended not to see that the entire oligarchic structure of Ukraine "wanted to put" from a high bell tower on Russia, because that Europe is "tse culture", ugh, forgive me, Lord !!!! As a result, we got what we got .... So I had a question about this: "Did they consciously do it or out of mental simplicity?" Now the people on both sides of the barricades are raking out to the fullest at the cost of their lives, their loved ones, friends, relatives, etc.
        Therefore, do not cheat me indiscriminately, Dear ... hi
        1. 97110
          97110 30 October 2014 21: 17
          0
          Quote: TampaRU
          Therefore, do not cheat me indiscriminately, Dear ..
          I'm not trying to find fault. Our country has its own difficult story. Take a break from the fact that all Ukraine is guilty. And do not say that Russia has not done for the reporting 23 years. Better analyze what the Ukrainians did with their nenko. To spoil Russia, in a crowd in pro-Americans went. And without a twinge of conscience they say that Russia is to blame. Maybe you don’t remember how Russia lived after 1985. And we have a little that was in stores. And on coupons. That is, when it is necessary - Russia is poor and drunk, when it is necessary - it did not, did not outbid the Americans, did not give more money. Ours said they invested $ 200 billion. Few. But for $ 5 billion they sold the whole country. I’ve got loose, sorry. I wanted to say that do not look for the guilty, analyze your actions.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  28. victorrat
    victorrat 29 October 2014 17: 25
    0
    Whatever we write about culture, the main thing has been and remains - the economy. Culture, of course, doesn’t hurt, but we will be realistic. Now Russia has a chance to leave Geyropa and turn to South America and Asia. The more contracts there are, the more interesting we will be for them.
    And here the most important role of Putin is to make our businessmen and managers turn their backs on the West, that’s where the root of the solution is. Trade as much as possible. Take more goods from there, they are there.
    But our ruined light and heavy industry, having risen a little, thanks to sanctions, can offer something interesting.
    1. Stanislas
      Stanislas 30 October 2014 10: 42
      0
      Quote: victorrat
      the main thing was and will remain - the economy. Culture, of course, doesn’t hurt, but we will be realistic.
      Economics is one of the products of culture. Culture is the cause of economics. If you want to be realistic.
      1. 97110
        97110 30 October 2014 21: 20
        0
        Quote: Stanislav
        Economics is one of the products of culture. Culture is the cause of economics. If you want to be realistic.

        Not to argue. At the institute, a teacher of Marxism-Leninism told us that "an economic basis should be seen at the basis of any social phenomenon." It is somewhat reminiscent of a dispute about what came before, a chicken or an egg.
        1. Stanislas
          Stanislas 31 October 2014 11: 58
          0
          Quote: 97110
          The institute is a teacher of Marxism-Leninism
          Marxism (-Leninism) is not realism, but materialism.
  29. Alfizik
    Alfizik 29 October 2014 18: 23
    0
    Very faithful article! "What we do not keep ..." Why the branches of power do not work!
  30. Aleksey_K
    Aleksey_K 29 October 2014 19: 29
    +2
    The author is confusing something: "PR campaigns and constant incantations in the media that" Russia returned to Latin America "and almost controls the process actually disorient our population and mislead the country's leadership."
    It seems to me that the media did not know about the plans of the Kremlin. Putin travels the world expanding the influence of Russia. And, according to the author, the media are promoting "expansion of influence", while Putin reads newspapers and travels, well, completely in vain, to the countries of the world. Maybe the rags in the Kremlin rule Russia and give instructions on where to go to the president? In my opinion, the author of the article is misleading us.
  31. Talgat
    Talgat 29 October 2014 22: 32
    0
    probably in the middle
    on the one hand, yes - the influence of the United States is still huge in Latin America, otherwise it cannot be - because the FRS still retains the "divine power" of the printing press and credit financing and the USA is ROME now, no one is able to throw open call

    But on the other hand, the situation began to change and half of the world is dissatisfied with the immoral, unjust and dictatorial policy of the new "gods" - of course you cannot throw them off - but you can unite at least "get off your knees" to stop paying a huge slave tribute. And in this camp, of course, all 9 countries of the Bolivarian Union, led by Venezuela and Cuba, are on the front line, with them on the same front line in fact Argentina and Syria with Iran (Alba observer members), behind their backs are already BRICS with regional allies, and it looks like ( no offense to the russians), the leader is already China (bank brix, analogs of the imf, support of the alba) and not the russian federation.

    T e support for the liberation movement in Latin America is not only a headache for the Russian Federation - but also for China and its role will increase
  32. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 29 October 2014 23: 04
    0
    I answer briefly: "Zay.yutsya!"
  33. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 30 October 2014 02: 09
    0
    leaders of the countries of the region, who have declared strategic partnership with Russia, are under severe pressure from the opposition, supported by the United States, and a constant threat of bias.

    In all countries that at least somehow want to get out of the rough influence of the United States, there is not a "frail" opposition, which exists on the money of the AMER. In Russia, we see the same picture. We wrote above that "they are fleeing to the USA (Latin Americans)". And where to run - the United States is at hand. The economy will recover and get stronger, there will be work and will not run. Latin Americans are not bad patriots of their countries. Friendship and cooperation between Russia and the countries of Latin America is essential.
  34. SAHALIN
    SAHALIN 30 October 2014 07: 17
    0
    I do not think that it is difficult for the special services (FSB, SVR, GRU) to monitor the flow of mattress money for the opposition! Another question arises - do they want to? And are there many recruited persons among them? It is first necessary to understand inside Russia, as they say, "who is with whom and who is under whom," and then to implement far-reaching plans with strategic partners, I think this is what V.V. Putin, good luck to him, and God bless him !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  35. Wolka
    Wolka 30 October 2014 07: 34
    0
    everything in this world is relative, you should not be so pessimistic about the political face of Latin America, but you should always be prepared for anomalies in its politics ...
  36. Dragon-y
    Dragon-y 30 October 2014 11: 14
    0
    "... The naive dream" to live as they live in the States "has not gone anywhere from the mass consciousness. Emigration to the USA or to Western Europe is still a criterion of success for a huge number of Latin Americans ..."

    - show them footage from Detroit, or from the "black" neighborhoods of some San Francisco or Los Angeles, then ask - do they still want to go there? ..