The new world order will be created by the Chinese, Indians and Russians.

56
As the latest IMF report showed, there has been a major shift in the global economy. Developed countries are weakening, while developing countries are getting stronger. The United States is no longer the first economy on the planet. The first in terms of GDP, calculated on PPP, was China, and India overtook Japan. And Russia is right there.

The new world order will be created by the Chinese, Indians and Russians.


In the newspaper "Russia & India Report" Columnist Rakesh Krishnan Simha said that developed countries are lagging behind in terms of economic indicators to developing countries. The definitions themselves - “developed” and “developing”, thus, can already be questioned.

As the analyst writes, the IMF annual report confirmed: the future belongs to BRICS. As for the strength of Western economies, it decreases even faster than previously thought. The report of the International Monetary Fund clearly shows: the global economic landscape has changed dramatically.

According to the IMF, China in the global economy took the lead and “overthrown” the USA, which previously occupied the place of the first economic power on the planet.

India came in third place, ahead of Japan. In the top ten are also Germany, Russia, Brazil, France and Indonesia. Closes the top ten UK. In the list of 10 best countries - four BRICS countries, exclaims browser.

He further notes that with a nominal calculation in US dollars, China’s economy will still be smaller than the US economy, expressed in the same dollars. However, when recalculating at purchasing power parity (PPP), Chinese GDP will be 17.600 billion dollars, and US GDP at the same PPP - 17.400 billion dollars.

In this case, the analyst notes that the calculation of PPP gives us a "more realistic picture of economic activity." This is a more accurate way to compare the size of economies. Exchange rates are, in essence, a hoax.

(By the way, earlier this same author compared BRICS with David and the West with Goliath, hinting at the future if not the victory, then the leadership of developing countries in the global economy.)

Comrade Rakesh Krishnan Simha notes that the rapid weakening of Western economies compared to those of developing countries "surprised everyone." The key word is “fast.”

The author recalls that in the 1990 year, when the Soviet Union was on the verge of collapse, the West triumphed, claiming the aggregate GDP of the G7 countries to 12 trillion. dollars. This was more than the GDP of the seven largest developing nations today - China, India, Russia, Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico and South Africa. However, by 2013, the same seven states had an aggregate GDP of 3 trillion. dollars more than G7 countries.

China has generally risen against all forecasts. Most recently, in 2005, its economy was less than half the US economy. The National Intelligence Council, which oversees the American intelligence community, predicted that China would only overtake the US by 2020.

As for India, its rise is not far off. The only thing that stops India from growing at an unprecedented rate, the percentage of 10-15 per year is ... India itself, the Indian author sneers. Nevertheless, the Citi Group is predicting the rise of India to the 2050 year to the value of the first economy on the planet. That is, the country will overtake China. According to the Citi Group forecast, by this time India will become the world's largest economy with a GDP of 85 trillion. US dollars in 2050 g. GDP will be 80 trillion. dollars will be ranked third with a GDP of 39 trillions of dollars.

Further, the author goes to Russia.

Russia overtook Brazil and only a few tens of billions of dollars behind Germany. In fact, the analyst notes, the restoration of Russia is "the most spectacular." Especially if you remember how the Russian manufacturing sector collapsed in the 1990's.

“It seems that the more the West is trying to oust Russia, the more stable its economy becomes!”


Raised in the article and the theme of the new world order.

The geopolitical "hierarchy" on the planet has remained unshakable since the Second World War. Will it now?

The author recalls that both the United Nations, the IMF, and the World Bank are all in the reform stage.

Recently, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi stressed that 1.200.000.000 Indians are inadequately represented in the UN. This is the case: it’s ridiculous that the United Kingdom and France are members of the UN Security Council, while India, Japan and Brazil are not included.

Quotas in the IMF are even more surprising. The USA has a large share in 16,7%. At the same time, China has 3,8% - even slightly less than Italy, which has one-fifth of the Chinese economy.

And financiers understand these problems.

IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde believes that America’s refusal to ratify reforms, that is, to increase its stake in the Fund of China, India and other developing countries, means threatening the future of the IMF. The quota reform, which began to be talked about in the 2012 year, “has matured in the 2014 year,” Lagard told 9 in October at a press conference.

Finally, Rakesh Krishnan Simha told about Western "affection."

The latter seems to him far more noticeable than the economic recession of the West itself. For example, a recent survey by the Pew Research Center showed that only 28 percent of US citizens believe that the American people are "exceptional or greatest."

Analysts today are talking about the collapse of the "imperial state", the impossibility further "to impose their will anywhere in the world" and even the impotence of the United States as the "supposed world superpower."

Simha adds to this that once the United States is the “engine of the Western alliance,” their weakening has a “domino effect” on the remaining West, and on the “vassals” too - for example, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Georgia Pakistan and so on.

As a result, the new world order will be created not by the developed countries, but by those that today belong to the developing ones. “Critical mass” for “laying” the foundation of a new order will be with them. These countries will be independent of the international order previously established by the West.

No, the states of the West will not turn into herbivores. They simply lose their absolute power. Attenuation will be only relative, the analyst indicates. Indeed, in general, the quality of life, for example, in the United States and Europe, is much higher than in China or India. In addition, Western transnational corporations control the “fatty piece” of world production, and Western universities attract hundreds of thousands of students from developing countries. Silicon Valley and Western innovation processes really have no equal.

And yet the days when the West was the undisputed leader and could dictate its policy to the planet are gone.

Every year, China, India and Russia become richer, and militarily - more powerful. The gap in living standards is rapidly closing. By 2050, the top 10 of the largest economies will include new entrants - Egypt, Mexico, Nigeria. And in this ten, only the United States will represent the West. Welcome to the multi-polar world, the author sums up.

Thus, let us add on our own, it finally became clear: the economic forecasts that were issued by the Western economic community over the past few years did not materialize. From about the year 2009, American economic "gurus" predicted to China a quick decline in growth rates and almost a recession - in case he did not carry out "structural reforms." (Russia, by the way, knows well what “structural reforms” are: it took place in the 1990s, when the IMF played almost completely in its economic field, and the former Soviet production was smashed with “genuine passion” by the Chicago boys.) on the advice of Western "specialists", China politely smiled and went on its way. And what do we see? Now the IMF is being reformed ...

Observed and translated by Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    56 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +56
      27 October 2014 08: 45
      Here, one Swede considered (http://www.awarablogs.com/group/index.php?option=com_easyblog&view=entry&id=155) that if we exclude the growth of public and private debt, and take only the growth of real production, then for the last 8 years old:
      - Russia grew by 147%
      - Europe fell by 30%
      - The USA fell by 54% !!!

      They now keep only on printing money and horror stories for the whole world. But it cannot go on forever, and when it babakhnet, we will see a real naked king.

      And it will be soon, because even the IMF (the nearest maid of honor of the king) is seeing the light.
      1. +15
        27 October 2014 08: 57
        That's interesting.
        I hope that Putin will soon print out the stabilization fund and invest in infrastructure and means of production with high-tech elements.
        1. +42
          27 October 2014 09: 10
          Russia is now acting as a catalyst in the renewal of the world .. We are not afraid of anyone, judging by the latest events. Again we are saving the world ..?))) We see such a fate ... Oh, and I really want peace and stability! "My hut is on the edge .." This is not our mental mentality .. I hope that everything will happen without big sacrifices! God bless Russia!
          1. alexandrovich
            +3
            27 October 2014 17: 42
            Correctly formulated thought, I agree completely!
            1. -9
              27 October 2014 20: 22
              The article of faith is almost ZERO.
              FOR:
              Russia & India Report

              24 bld. 4 Pravdy street,
              Moscow 125 993
              Rossiyskaya gazeta office

              Tel. + 7 495 775 3114
              Fax +7 495 988 9213 When the same thing is said in the Air Force (for example), then yes.
              1. 0
                27 October 2014 22: 10
                There is no prophet in his own country?
              2. -2
                28 October 2014 15: 31
                The Air Force is lying more than the rest. Each edition fulfills the owner’s order. so that...
          2. 0
            31 October 2014 00: 26
            I agree with you Mikhan completely on all 100 !!!
        2. +10
          27 October 2014 14: 44
          We have already begun this process. See: BAM-2, Vostochny Cosmodrome, mass construction of roads and bridges (bridges in Vladivostok, Volgograd, the bridge on Russky Island and the Crimea - the first thing that came to mind), construction of high-speed railways (Moscow-Kazan), individual development programs regions - the Far East, Krasnodar Territory, Crimea, Kaliningrad. Preparations for the World Cup will also contribute to this. I think that we have already moved in the right direction.
        3. +1
          27 October 2014 17: 53
          Quote: mojohed2012
          I hope that Putin will soon print out the stabilization fund and invest in infrastructure and means of production with high-tech elements

          Well, I’ve already printed it, only neither the means of production nor high technology (where to get them - sanctions in the yard)
          And as always in raw materials
          those. Rosneft

          Rosneft and NOVATEK will receive money from the National Wealth Fund

          Their application was approved by the Ministry of Energy. At the same time, the amount requested by one of the companies is more than half of the entire fund.
          Rosneft expects to receive more than two trillion rubles from the funds of the National Welfare Fund. This figure was called by the Minister of Finance Anton Siluanov this evening. This application has already been received by the Ministry of Economic Development. The ministry says they now have three weeks to review it. The oil company asks for this money, including for the construction of the Eastern Petrochemical Company in the Primorsky Territory, and for the investment program as a whole. Novatek needs funds, in particular, for a project to build a plant for the production of liquefied natural gas in Yamal. As Energy Minister Alexander Novak confirmed today, the application of Rosneft in his department has already been approved
          1. +4
            27 October 2014 20: 30
            Excuse me, but does the construction of factories not belong to infrastructure and production facilities? Or a comment so that a pause is something to occupy?
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. +2
          28 October 2014 15: 29
          To do this, you need to stop the theft of bigwigs through one-day firms and squeeze corruption. Otherwise, it will be just FUCK.
      2. +3
        27 October 2014 09: 11
        Quote: Sensatus
        and take only the growth of real production, then over the past 8 years:
        - Russia grew by 147%

        Oh, now the Communists will come running and scream that nothing is being done. Putin is dancing to the tune of the United States, and Medvedev is resigned.
        It’s strange like that, the internal sector is growing, but some do not see, maybe night blindness what
        1. nvv
          nvv
          +9
          27 October 2014 09: 45
          And I somewhat disagree with the article. This is the path to globalization on the part of Russia.
          1. -4
            27 October 2014 12: 16
            Quote: nvv
            And I somewhat disagree with the article. This is the path to globalization on the part of Russia.

            Well, yes, the release of another 3 million barrels of oil to the (Iranian) market - after lifting the sanctions - explain to me how prices will react and how this will help Russia?
            1. +11
              27 October 2014 12: 36
              It will help, because Iranian oil will go to Russia through barter for Russian goods.
              1. -4
                27 October 2014 12: 55
                Quote: DartWerther
                It will help, because Iranian oil will go to Russia through barter for Russian goods.


                And what will Russia do with this oil?
                To sell? Or do you think that manufacturers do not have to pay for goods?
                Now back to the initial question, what will happen to the price of oil when new volumes appear on the market?
                1. +9
                  27 October 2014 14: 36
                  Quote: atalef
                  And what will Russia do with this oil? Sell it? Or do you think that manufacturers do not have to pay for goods? Now back to the initial question, what will happen to the price


                  In order:
                  With oil, Russia will do what it has been doing all the time - to sell.
                  Manufacturers have to pay for goods, and this is not a problem from the sale of oil.
                  Oil prices may or may not fall, but we don’t know at what price we agreed with Iran wink
                  1. +1
                    27 October 2014 15: 49
                    Quote: Botanologist
                    Oil prices may or may not fall, but we don’t know at what price we agreed with Iran


                    You have a strange view of the economy
                    At any time, the release of an additional volume of goods to the market - lowers its price --- this is an axiom
                    Further, as you rightly pointed out, no one knows what Russia will do with oil. I don’t know how many options you have in your head, but only 2 are real
                    - to sell or store in containers - you can certainly pour it into the rivers - but this is already from the realm of fiction -)
                    so, in the first case - to sell
                    If you want to keep the price of oil at the same level. then you have the same only 2 ways
                    1. Reduce your quota
                    2. persuade others to reduce their
                    It seems to me that with the second option it will be more difficult, and the same with the first. maybe selling Iranian oil and not selling your own (again, I remind you that we reduce our quota to maintain prices) --- we won nothing because in the end we get the same money, and we drive goods to Iran for free
                    2. O-th option (which is likely to be)
                    Russia will start selling Iranian oil, increasing its supply on the market and accordingly dropping the price (by the way, no one knows how much, but that it will fall is an axiom)
                    Further, since the prices of goods supplied to Iran are fixed prices (no producer will agree to sell goods in relation to oil prices), then the risks fall solely on Russia since the volume of goods is known; the price is the same; the volume of oil sold by Iran is the same.
                    Only the profit possibly received by Russia will change.
                    that is, if the price for producers of goods does not change, for Iran the volume of oil does not change - what do you think - who risks in this situation. Especially now, when the price of oil is only falling, and an agreement with Iran was concluded when Sechin was sure that oil could not be cheaper than 95 bucks.
                    1. +2
                      27 October 2014 16: 28
                      Quote: atalef

                      Quote: Botanologist
                      Oil prices may or may not fall, but we don’t know at what price we agreed with Iran


                      You have a strange view of the economy
                      ........

                      Further, since the prices of goods supplied to Iran are fixed prices (no producer will agree to sell goods in relation to oil prices), then the risks fall solely on Russia since the volume of goods is known; the price is the same; the volume of oil sold by Iran is the same.
                      Only the profit possibly received by Russia will change.
                      that is, if the price for producers of goods does not change, for Iran the volume of oil does not change - what do you think - who risks in this situation. Especially now, when the price of oil is only falling, and an agreement with Iran was concluded when Sechin was sure that oil could not be cheaper than 95 bucks.


                      But you forgot that the Russian product also already has a marginal margin, added value ... How do we know what it is? Perhaps it also contains possible risks? .... hi
                      1. -1
                        27 October 2014 17: 45
                        Quote: TampaRU
                        But you forgot that the Russian product also already has a marginal margin, added value ... How do we know what it is? Perhaps it also contains possible risks? ....

                        In the price of goods, risks are not laid down for one reason. In the case of oil, you cannot adjust the selling price (except for lowering the output on the market), but Russia is not a member of OPEC - then its desire will not be binding on the rest and its niche will be immediately occupied.
                        Remember one thing
                        Russia sells the amount of oil that it can produce (that is, always the maximum), in the case of Russia, it is dependent (in oil prices) on two factors
                        1. OPEC policy - as a factor, it is able to simultaneously increase oil production on the market (or to hold it)
                        2. The development of the world economy and related oil consumption
                        As you can see, not one of these levers is in the hands of Russia.
                        Now, maybe - production of oil in Russia for sale in general is maximally for every current moment of sale, and there will be enough oil for many decades to come - Russia a priori does not create strategic reserves and does not save with reserves.
                        Why am I leading this?
                        Selling oil to Russia is like driving snow to the Eskimos.
                        Its enough, and besides hemorrhoids with the sale it will not bring anything
                        . Now the situation is developing further
                        Iran selling oil (via barter) receives goods from Russia (i.e., it has already freed itself from a part of its oil accumulated over the years of sanctions - having received goods from Russia for this) how it will sell it is not his business, but what the most interesting thing is that barter to Russia does not remove it from the market for the sale of its oil (which it simply has a sea of) and after lifting the sanctions, its quota of 3 million barrels per day will flood the markets equally
                        What do we get at the exit
                        Russia with its oil (constant amount) from Iran - which needs to be sold the same and here in addition (where not to get it) another 3 million barrels of Iran --- what will happen to the price?
                        It is not necessary to be a particularly inquiring mind, one would understand.
                        Risks? Risks are when it turns out (as for example in the case of Venezuela and China) - that the goods will come to Iran (for Iran) for a penny, but the Russian budget will be forced to pay the full cost to producers of goods (as a guarantor of the transaction).
                        Risks - of course I understand that Iran is another friend for hegemony in the world and victory over the Uses (apparently it’s a pity that they do not really understand this, or rather understand it) —but the Persians in general have always been able to trade, it seems to me that this whole an easy fight will again be paid by the Russian budget.
                        1. +1
                          27 October 2014 20: 26
                          Dear, you did not take into account a small detail. After an exchange with Iran, the price will be in rubles. I’ll think of it further.
                        2. 0
                          28 October 2014 10: 44
                          Dear, you seem to be from the Promised Land, but you probably don’t understand a bit about barter operations ......
                          The fact is that by changing your product with a large margin (the figure can fluctuate up to 1%, I went through this), you can reduce the input cost of Iranian oil. And 000 million barrels a day, this is perhaps a small figure in the total amount of oil produced ... Then you can come up with so many combinations that "my dear mom", as they say in Odessa-Mom ... :-))))
                          Therefore, everything is in order ... hi
                        3. The comment was deleted.
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                    3. The comment was deleted.
                    4. +1
                      27 October 2014 19: 18
                      Quote: atalef
                      At any time, the release of an additional volume of goods to the market - lowers its price --- this is an axiom


                      Oh really? And how much did the price of Toyota fall after entering the Chinese auto market?

                      Quote: atalef
                      what do you think - who takes risks in this situation.


                      Everyone associated with oil is at risk.
                      But you knowingly or unconsciously, but simplify the situation. Indeed, in this agreement there is more politics than business. And politics requires complex decisions.
                      In addition, how do you think Iran will be dependent on Russia when its oil goes through Russia?
                      1. 0
                        27 October 2014 19: 47
                        Quote: Botanologist
                        Oh really? And how much did the price of Toyota fall after entering the Chinese auto market?

                        You are generally trying to compare. incomparable things
                        Oil is sold in standard mixtures.
                        If China let out a Mercedes. one on one with German and for half the price - Mercedes would have lowered the same price.

                        Quote: Botanologist
                        But you knowingly or unconsciously, but simplify the situation. Indeed, in this agreement there is more politics than business. And politics requires complex decisions.

                        We talk about money. and if you mean paoliticism - then of course - over 130 billion debts have been forgiven - they will be forgiven for the same amount. And that the people are apparently ready for this. Distribute wealth to freeloaders, but what? Allies laughing
                        Quote: Botanologist
                        In addition, how do you think Iran will be dependent on Russia when its oil goes through Russia?

                        No way, maybe its oil through Russia (physically) will not go.
                        These volumes will be sold directly from Iranian terminals, and he will have his oil left - well, in general, even more than to hell.
                        1. The comment was deleted.
                        2. 0
                          27 October 2014 23: 58
                          Quote: atalef
                          No way, maybe its oil through Russia (physically) will not go.


                          And financially? Do you intentionally pretend that you do not understand, or really do not understand?

                          Quote: atalef
                          We talk about money. and if you mean paoliticism - then of course


                          We kind of talk about everything. And the article is not about oil, by the way.
                          Quote: atalef
                          You are generally trying to compare. incomparable things Oil is sold in standard mixtures. If China let out a Mercedes. one on one with German and for half the price - Mercedes would have lowered the same price.


                          I'm not trying. You started it with the laws of the market in a very loose interpretation, and I gave you an example. These "ifs" are not necessary. And then Putin will have to be quoted wink
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                2. The comment was deleted.
            2. +5
              27 October 2014 18: 38
              Well, the desire to alienate Iran and the Russian Federation is understandable - but it hurts the arguments are primitive I apologize
              By this logic, Venezuela is not a friend of Russia - it sells oil

              in fact, Iran also sells gas - and the creation of "gas trusteeship" is undesirable for the West
              But the Russian Federation and Iran are already almost allies in fact - and the possession of oil and gas, on the contrary, gives them the opportunity to jointly influence the market and politics more - and they will agree with each other

              Enough to steer the Saudi Cathars and other fat sheiks along with the amers, etc.

              the second instrument of Western and liberal propaganda - attempts to represent Iran as a country of Islamic fanatics, etc. - again from a bad mind to a healthy one - these are just Washington's friends, the Saudis, real obscurantists from the Middle Ages and the organizers of terrorism

              Ahmadinejad from a world other than the Saudis in general is a friend of Hugo Chavez and the Bolivarians - a real fiery freedom fighter - I’m not afraid of this definition
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. 0
                27 October 2014 18: 46
                Quote: Talgat
                Well, the desire to alienate Iran and the Russian Federation is understandable - but it hurts the arguments are primitive I apologize

                Are Iran and Russia friends?
                Or do you think that Iran, in order to balance the Russian budget, will give it its piece of cake - I will disappoint you
                This Monday, it also became known that Iran plans to significantly increase oil production. This was stated by Iran’s deputy oil minister Mansur Moazzami, TASS reports with reference to the IRNA agency.

                The Islamic Republic plans to increase its oil refining capacity from the current 1,8 million barrels per day to 3 million barrels. According to OPEC, daily oil production in Iran in September was 2,675 million barrels. According to Iranian experts, Iran’s proven oil reserves will last 60 years.

                Iran is considering various scenarios for responding to the volatility of oil prices, the Iranian official said. “We ruled the country at a price of $ 5 per barrel and at a price of $ 140 per barrel, we had no problems with that,” said Mansur Moazzami. According to him, when preparing the budget for next year, the government did not count on a price range of $ 90-100 per barrel, but adhered to a more realistic approach to avoid possible problems. Until now, Iran has not faced budget deficits.


                Quote: Talgat
                By this logic, Venezuela is not a friend of Russia - it sells oil


                This is your logic, however, following it, why would Venezuela and Russia not agree and lower production - by increasing prices? Friends after all?
                Quote: Talgat
                in fact, Iran also sells gas - and the creation of "gas trusteeship" is undesirable for the West

                There is no gas OPEC and will not be
                Quote: Talgat
                But the Russian Federation and Iran are already almost allies in fact - and the possession of oil and gas, on the contrary, gives them the opportunity to jointly influence the market and politics more - and they will agree with each other

                Iran is a member of OPEC. Then any, well, such a small example of an agreement (on oil prices) - well, at least one?
                Quote: Talgat
                Enough to steer the Saudi Cathars and other fat sheiks along with the amers, etc.

                Of course enough - they only produce oil more than the rest
                Quote: Talgat
                Ahmadinejad from a world other than the Saudis in general is a friend of Hugo Chavez and the Bolivarians - a real fiery freedom fighter - I’m not afraid of this definition

                Yes, I look at all in the subject
                Ahmadinejad is not a president for a long time
                Chavez is dead.
                Do the news reach you at all?
        2. -1
          27 October 2014 09: 48
          Rather, they do not want to see. For 40 years, they are so used to seeing the top doing nothing, stagnating in stagnation that they simply do not believe and do not want to believe.
          1. +8
            27 October 2014 11: 02
            The large numbers and their juxtaposition are impressive. But we must not forget that the growth of the state's economy is not for concentrating more funds in the hands of the oligarchs and increasing the number of the latter, but for improving the quality of life of the absolute majority of the citizens of the state can be true progress. Often, calls from governments - to tighten their belts for the future good - end up dividing this "good" between oligarchs, corrupt officials on the one hand, and bad demographics, impoverishment of the majority of citizens, and a decline in education and medical services for the population, on the other.
            1. 225chay
              0
              27 October 2014 13: 55
              Quote: 1812 1945
              The large numbers and their juxtaposition are impressive. But we must not forget that the growth of the state's economy is not for concentrating more funds in the hands of the oligarchs and increasing the number of the latter, but for improving the quality of life of the absolute majority of the citizens of the state can be true progress. Often, calls from governments - to tighten their belts for the future good - end up dividing this "good" between oligarchs, corrupt officials on the one hand, and bad demographics, impoverishment of the majority of citizens, and a decline in education and medical services for the population, on the other.


              By the way, it would not hurt to find and publish the names of those "comrades" who contributed and gave orders to bankrupt and destroy the country's industry ...
            2. +1
              27 October 2014 14: 33
              Without improving the socio-economic situation and destroying the capitalists in Russia, everything can collapse in one day. This is our weak spot and we must put an end to it sooner, otherwise the hungry people and ... hello - the revolution and the country's dumping for decades.
              N E _ D O P U S T I M _ E T O G O! ! !


              GOSPODY, KH R A N AND _ R O S S I U!
          2. 0
            27 October 2014 12: 19
            Recently, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi stressed that 1.200.000.000 Indians are inadequately represented in the UN. This is the case: it’s ridiculous that the United Kingdom and France are members of the UN Security Council, while India, Japan and Brazil are not included.

            Russia is the first against the expansion of the Soviet Security Council of the United Nations
            NEW YORK, Sep 28 - RIA News. The expansion of the UN Security Council, as well as the increase in the number of permanent members with the right of veto, will significantly complicate the work of the world organization, Vitaly Churkin, Russia's Permanent Representative to the United Nations, believes.

            "Some argue that the Security Council will become more effective if more countries join it. Having worked for a certain number of years in the Security Council, I can say that this is not so. The more members, the more difficult it is to make a decision, the more difficult it is to develop consensus, the harder it is to listen to everyone, the more difficult take all points of view into account, "the diplomat said in an interview with Rossiyskaya Gazeta, which will be published on Monday.


            РИА Новости http://ria.ru/world/20140928/1025982444.html#ixzz3HKrD06p2
            1. P-38
              +2
              27 October 2014 15: 58
              Russia is against when in the UN Security Council the United States is trying to push its satellites, without taking into account the population and contribution to the global economy
      3. sergant6776
        +6
        27 October 2014 11: 00
        They now keep only on printing money and horror stories for the whole world. But it cannot go on forever, and when it babakhnet, we will see a real naked king.

        The main thing is to get rid of the dollar and help to substitute the leg in time ...
      4. -3
        27 October 2014 12: 14
        Quote: Sensatus
        Here, one Swede considered (http://www.awarablogs.com/group/index.php?option=com_easyblog&view=entry&id=155) that if we exclude the growth of public and private debt, and take only the growth of real production, then for the last 8 years old:
        - Russia grew by 147%
        - Europe fell by 30%
        - The USA fell by 54% !!!

        .

        Do not read bedtime stories, look out the window
        Which China has overtaken the USA? Stop laughing.
        Who counts in absolute terms?
        So we get that it’s better to live in Russia than in Monaco (and that the GDP of Russia is much higher than the GDP of Monaco and Luxembourg and Sweden combined)
        There is one real figure - GDP per capita.
        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA_%D1%81%D1%82%
        D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%BF%D0%BE_%D0%92%D0%92%D0%9F_(%D0%9F%D0%9F%D0%A1)_%D0%BD%D0
        %B0_%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%88%D1%83_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1
        % 8F
        Check out and understand where and who.
      5. rodevaan
        0
        27 October 2014 13: 22
        - I hope that soon. So far, they have just collapsed ... I hope to live to see the moment when this enemy breaks apart completely. So far, until they completely collapse, unfortunately, a very long time.
      6. +2
        27 October 2014 14: 47
        The definitions themselves are “developed” and “developing,” so you can already question it.


        Why doubt? If a country considers itself "developed", it means that there is no reason for it to move. But the "developing" state is ready for movement and development. The "developed" country is a monkey. The "developing" country is a fire-producing Neanderthal. Evolution, its mother is nature!
        1. +1
          27 October 2014 15: 53
          Quote: Buran
          The "developed" country is a monkey. The "developing" country is a fire-producing Neanderthal. Evolution, its mother is nature!

          Well, try to explain your theory to the Swedes monkeys (with their developed country) and decay, and to the Neanderthals Ethiopians - who have a great and bright future ahead.
      7. +1
        27 October 2014 17: 52
        Very beautiful and interesting data, thanks smile We’ll throw a link to the enemies of Russia, let them die of malice fellow
        1. nvv
          nvv
          0
          28 October 2014 02: 35
          Bravo Atalef !!! Not a bad job. I led the crowd away from the meaning of the video. And how much effort was spent on it. good laughingAnd all for this you need to start a shop conversation. lol
          1. +1
            28 October 2014 10: 29
            Quote: nvv
            Bravo Atalef !!! Not a bad job. I led the crowd away from the meaning of the video. And how much effort was spent on it. good laughing And all for this you need to start a shop conversation. lol

            I don’t know, maybe my comment will be considered anti-Russian, but Comrade Atalef speaks correctly, albeit in some places emotionally. The oil needle for the Russian economy is a critical issue. The pricing factors for global oil prices are not directly controlled by the Russian Federation, here the US ball at the head of OPEC rules. Receiving a consignment of oil from Iran does not bode well for serious dividends. Perhaps Iranian oil will be used not for economic but for political purposes, to support friendly regimes with cheap fuel and lubricants. A deal with Iranian oil is a barter deal and not a production sharing agreement. Now, if the Russian Federation under the PSA would have mastered oil production in Iran, it would be more profitable for the Russian Federation. No dollar settlement is good.
            1. nvv
              nvv
              0
              28 October 2014 12: 06
              Quote: bazilio
              but comrade Atalef speaks correctly

              You see the video, if you watched it, is not about that at all. And about the creation of the Russian world, where there will be no place for either shopkeepers or bankers. hi
              1. +1
                28 October 2014 13: 14
                Quote: nvv
                You see the video, if you watched it, is not about that at all. And about the creation of the Russian world, where there will be no place for either shopkeepers or bankers.

                You see, if you watched the video, it’s not about creating the RUSSIAN WORLD at all, but about the models of globalization and the creation of a multi-regional BLOCK in which all participants will be equitable.
                In a pleasant voice in the video voiced utopian ideas.
                1. nvv
                  nvv
                  +1
                  28 October 2014 13: 46
                  I understood the hint in the first word. I’m answering. I consider the members of the VO to be fellow soldiers, therefore I understand you. Second: The creation of a multi-regional Bloc is the first step towards the creation of the Russian World. By the Russian World I mean not only Russia. The USSR was also in some ways the Russian World. Regarding the last sentence, if you insist on it, the conversation will not work. hi
                  1. +1
                    28 October 2014 14: 10
                    Quote: nvv
                    .Creation of a multi-regional Bloc is the first step towards the creation of the Russian World. By the Russian World I mean not only Russia. The USSR was also in some way the Russian World.

                    Tell me, what do you think is the Russian world? what should it look like — a bloc alliance, a state of a federal or confidential type?
                    Quote: nvv
                    As for the last sentence, if you insist on it, the conversation will not work

                    Sorry, not specified. I consider utopian equal rights of all members of the bloc and any other any union / association.
                    1. nvv
                      nvv
                      0
                      28 October 2014 14: 56
                      Quote: bazilio
                      Tell me, what do you think is the Russian world? what should it look like — a bloc alliance, a state of a federal or confidential type?


                      The Russian World, on the example of Russia. Russia annexed the lands. People did not destroy, but they joined. You will probably smile, if I say, become equal. The elite became equal. But this was due to imperfection of the system. The next step of the USSR. The system is more just. The creation of Warsaw block, this is the Russian World.
                      Quote: bazilio
                      I consider utopian equal rights of all members of the bloc and any other any union / association.
                      I agree. In a capitalist society this is impossible. How to be? Change the system to a more fair
                      I didn’t say anything new, you probably know it yourself.
                      1. +1
                        29 October 2014 10: 49
                        Quote: nvv
                        . Russia annexed land. Peoples were not destroyed, but joined.

                        Here is a controversial issue - the Russian Empire annexed the land through military expansion, that is, capture. The Caucasus, Central Asia, etc. serve as an example. I think it’s not worth saying that the fighting did not go without casualties on both sides. But not the point. If I understand you correctly, in your concept Russian World is a state of confidential type, like the USSR.


                        Quote: nvv
                        The next stage of the USSR. The system is more fair. The creation of the Warsaw block, this is the Russian World.


                        With the union, there was total centralization; one can talk about the equal rights of the subjects of the USSR with a big stretch. Regarding CMEA and equality, let us recall the Prague spring of 68 and the Hungarian uprising of 56, which were crushed by the forces of the SA ... very equal.

                        Why am I doing this - you need to call a spade a spade (not the Russian WORLD, but the Russian EMPIRE)
                        1. nvv
                          nvv
                          0
                          30 October 2014 14: 53
                          I showed the steps to the creation of the Russian world. Do you want to become a lady right away?
                    2. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +3
      27 October 2014 08: 52
      Not Indians, but Indians, anyway, what to write: Buddhists, Indians, Christians, Muslims and Jews will create a new world order. hi
      1. +9
        27 October 2014 08: 58
        Here are just the United States and Europe, let us remove from Christians. What are they on ... Christians are apologists for Satan and sadomies. Take a look at Turchinov - their protege, a native of the United States.
        1. +3
          27 October 2014 09: 14
          Quote: mojohed2012
          Here are just the United States and Europe, let us remove from Christians. What are they on ... Christians are apologists for Satan and sadomies. Take a look at Turchinov - their protege, a native of the United States.

          -------------------------
          Brandon Watkins III If we get a libertarian president this time all of that ends. Libertarians only build friendship and no meddling. We have worked hard getting that voice out. Republican and democrats are both scum. They have bought their way. Finally people are standing up. The militias are back strong. And they're not govt. Their oath is constitution and fellow man. And fellow man everywhere not just here. I'm ashamed that people let it get so bad
          11 hours · Dislike · 1
          Ewgeniy Nikitin American people are not foolish ... But American government are crazy crew ... With the main Dummy named Obama ...
          11 hours · Like
          Brandon Watkins III You are right my friend. We know what's going on. And we are changing it. But must only use force as a last resort. Things are changing. Libertarian and independents used to get maybe two or three percent. Now they are polling at near fifteen. We're trying to wake the others. Russian are the only other country that takes so much pride in our land, traditions and people. We are proud of it but are ashamed of this group of idiots in power. They found that democrat is cheating voting machines
          11 hours · Like
          Larisa Lorik http://yummybook.ru/catalog/recept/pelmeni-novogodnie
          11 hour · Like · 1
          Ewgeniy Nikitin Brandon, You have to know that Russians are not against American people ... It's a very crazy idea that we want to fight with Americans ... Our grandfathers made this world for us ... And we have no rights to break it ...
          11 hour · Like · 2
          Elena Kovalenko One million times agree ..... I want friendship with USA ... imagine, how much possibilities we have to make this world better ..... to destroy - very simple, to build - long time
          11 hour · Like · 2
          Brandon Watkins III I know that. It's government policy that makes few hate. Most of us can tell the truth. We know Putin does great things and Obama is ruining it. We remember our grandparents fighting together. Our biggest difference is we don't want it like Germany was. 90% of the Germans were good but look what the ten percent did. Same with muslims. Nobody likes war but we must not allow that hate to grow. There is white and Christian genocide going on. After they kill them Russia and the states have the largest white Christian population.
          -----------------------
          Well, by the way, one American wrote about Christians yesterday on Facebook, although the conversation was generally about vodka and dumplings ... My comments and Brandon Watkins III ... To translate, paste the copied text into Google Translate ...
        2. +6
          27 October 2014 09: 46
          Quote: mojohed2012
          What are they on ... Christians are apologists for Satan and sadomies.

          I want to draw your attention, the central concept of the Orthodox religion is the trinity - which symbolizes the three facets of human nature:
          God the son is the body,
          god father is the mind
          god holy spirit - soul.
          At the same time, Western "Christians" do not recognize the trinity, they have a father in heaven and a son on earth, the soul is not provided for in Western religions.
          So their devilish, satanic essence is not a metaphor, but the harsh truth of life
      2. +4
        27 October 2014 09: 21
        yeah a catholics is a world credit bank for suckers
    3. +5
      27 October 2014 08: 55
      And when will the UN cease to exist!? An organization that no one listens to and that has long played a puppet role in the hands of a puppeteer-USA! It's a disgrace. You can’t say the other way. And at the expense of creating a new world order, I completely agree with Oleg. Like Russia , China, India and Brazil in terms of population and economic strength, together, clearly exceed the entire Western world.
      1. +3
        27 October 2014 09: 00
        I agree - the UN - it has become a structure at the level and in the spirit of an ordinary summit with a pre-agreed agenda.
        The United States and satellites have not taken UN authorization for war for a long time - they scored it in the case of bombing and aid to Iraq, including in Syria.
      2. +2
        27 October 2014 09: 13
        Quote: Magic Archer
        And when will the UN cease to exist !?

        Like the League of Nations-after warriors hi
    4. Tanechka-clever
      +7
      27 October 2014 09: 00
      "... The weakening will be only relative, the analyst points out ..."

      The confrontation between SYSTEMS will intensify, and for world civilization this can become destructive.

      At the same time, all countries in the world have the experience to AGREE except for the United States, which makes the United States not only non-contractual partners, but also DANGEROUS players in geopolitics, since they are a breeding ground for international terrorism as a form of introducing "controlled chaos" into the world order in the form of corruption, regular collapse, or change of government in other countries, as well as exercising global international control over financial and intellectual resources around the world.

      The USA cannot be re-educated .... since the "creation of CHAOS" in other countries and the management of this chaos is the US state ideology in the form of American exceptionalism. Therefore, the United States impedes the development of the progress of the world, planting American fascism around the world. And therefore, sooner or later, this problem will have to be resolved by the whole world, and possibly HARD.
      We are growing young people with new thinking - NOT Bribing ....
    5. +1
      27 October 2014 09: 00
      “It seems that the more the West is trying to oust Russia, the more stable its economy becomes!”

      Common threats, misfortunes, cataclysms, both natural and economic, unite the Russian people. And then the country, to the evil and death of the enemies gets up and begins to work miracles. The West does not understand this - they have a different mentality.
    6. +2
      27 October 2014 09: 01
      Refusal of the dollar in mutual settlements, even more likely to prove the United States. By joining forces, it is necessary to speed up this process as much as possible.
      The danger is that the United States will not try to do it alone while "dying". Here, a global conflict is just a stone's throw away. So you have to be on the lookout!
    7. +1
      27 October 2014 09: 02
      The United States will soon stop blathering altogether.
      Just look at Obama and McCain :)
    8. +4
      27 October 2014 09: 03
      Wait and see .. forecasts are not grateful
    9. +1
      27 October 2014 09: 04
      America's place, as soon as the dollar collapses, will very soon be at the junkyard of history.
      1. +6
        27 October 2014 09: 14
        Nda. Scary to imagine. Three hundred million people, accustomed to a partial freebie (to subsidies from the Federal Reserve) of a gang of niggas and Latinos, get a bunch of trunks.
      2. 0
        27 October 2014 15: 57
        Quote: raid14
        America's place, as soon as the dollar collapses, will very soon be at the junkyard of history.
        Well, in fact, something will change dramatically? A holy place does not happen empty, and the owners will try to maintain a unipolar world, since the economic leverage, cash reserves, multinational companies will remain in their hands, a small transition period and the pole will move to Australia , Britain, India or Brazil, and on the VO website, commentators will just as amiably blaspheme the new * master of the world *. These gentlemen do not have a homeland and put them deeply, in the dump of the USA or on the throne.
      3. +1
        27 October 2014 17: 11
        Quote: "America's place, once the dollar collapses, will very soon be in the dustbin of history."


        I would say in the "lectures" of history ...
    10. Crang
      +4
      27 October 2014 09: 08
      I would love to practice shooting tanks at the Statue of Liberty in the USA.
      1. +1
        27 October 2014 09: 17
        It’s a pity for the shells to lay explosives and spank! feel
      2. The comment was deleted.
    11. +9
      27 October 2014 09: 18
      We need to work in the fields, factories and factories, but does not hope for investment because of the cordon !!! Nobody will come to us with good deeds !!!
    12. 0
      27 October 2014 09: 33
      According to the IMF, China in the global economy took the lead and “overthrown” the USA, which previously occupied the place of the first economic power on the planet.
      - nothing pleases more than the failure of "friends" !!!
    13. +3
      27 October 2014 09: 35
      There is a bear in the taiga, in its taiga, and will not give it to anyone, dear.
      And the bull is time to slaughter, walked off, that's enough.
      To distribute sausage from a bull to countries rising to their feet (with a normal vision of the world).
    14. +1
      27 October 2014 09: 43
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Quote: Sensatus
      and take only the growth of real production, then over the past 8 years:
      - Russia grew by 147%

      Oh, now the Communists will come running and scream that nothing is being done. Putin is dancing to the tune of the United States, and Medvedev is resigned.
      It’s strange like that, the internal sector is growing, but some do not see, maybe night blindness what

      Yes, we can say that very little has been done. Kudrin alone squeezed the money and did not send it to production and agriculture, he was not the only one who directed them. And now the bell rang for the lesson, and it turned out that not only were the lessons not learned, but they had also lost a briefcase with textbooks and money. And immediately everyone ran in, arranged a show, and was looking for someone to blame. Probably DAD and MOM are to blame. No, PAPA is not to blame for the fact that the children are gouging. When there was an opportunity, it was necessary to build and rebuild. But the Communists or the Liberal Democratic Party are not to blame, without them the ruling party would cease to catch mice at all, look for the guilty ones, now the ruling party is ONE RUSSIA, and there is so much manure that you can’t scoop it with a bucket. And RUSSIA in such difficult times should be united and indivisible. soldier drinks
    15. +1
      27 October 2014 09: 47
      To understand what will be in the mattress, it is enough to recall what was in the flooded New Orleans.
      This is a clear model of mattress in case of any cataclysm. And not necessarily natural. Economic is also good.
    16. +1
      27 October 2014 10: 17
      Gunpowder, of course, must be kept dry. And I think no one will fight. To fight is expensive. War, in any of its manifestations, is destructive for the economy. (S and their European allies are a vivid example of this)
    17. 0
      27 October 2014 10: 26
      Quote: a52333
      Nda. Scary to imagine. Three hundred million people, accustomed to a partial freebie (to subsidies from the Federal Reserve) of a gang of niggas and Latinos, get a bunch of trunks.


      Migrant workers will go to Europe to work laughing, well, or to the shores of Belarus. Only if they find on the map.
    18. +2
      27 October 2014 10: 29
      [quote = Tanya-umnochka
      Moreover, all countries in the world have the experience to CONTRACT except the USA, which makes the USA not only non-contractual partners, but also DANGEROUS players in geopolitics ...

      The USA cannot be re-educated .... since the "creation of CHAOS" in other countries and the management of this chaos is the US state ideology in the form of American exceptionalism. Therefore, the United States hinders the development of the progress of the world ...
      I adhere to the idea that the United States is neither a contractual partner, nor an independent player. Originally created as a non-independent instrument of world politics. Politicians of shadow structures of the world.
    19. +4
      27 October 2014 10: 49
      Putin on Valdai clearly defined the position of Russia "Russians do not surrender ..!" And China, India, etc. agree with us (but still afraid of the West) silently support but oh well))) I am proud of Russia! Putin "politely" expressed what the majority of Russian citizens think about all this! And what can we do if we get it and make us angry .. It will be like this!
    20. +1
      27 October 2014 10: 57
      Quote: EDELVEISS
      Gunpowder, of course, must be kept dry. And I think no one will fight. To fight is expensive. War, in any of its manifestations, is destructive for the economy. (S and their European allies are a vivid example of this)

      War is a profitable business! Learn the story. It’s true when it is far away (war) and on foreign territory, so the Shtatovs are ready to fight to the last Ukrainian, Iranian, Afghan, etc. Nothing can raise the economy like a war.
    21. +3
      27 October 2014 11: 00
      We have excellent economists and administrators, leaders, we still do not have the political will of the authorities, a breakthrough is when 15-20 %% of GDP per year, as the Soviet Union did during the period of industrialization, this is a breakthrough, here is an example to follow. But with such an attitude of power, with such a government it is unlikely to succeed, the rotten policy of reforms like Gaidar-Chubaso-Kudrin completely failed our economy, a new course is needed. Until the authorities understand this, we will not move anywhere, the rest of the conversation, balobolstvo and a waste of time.
    22. 3vs
      0
      27 October 2014 12: 25
      And we are "doomed" to create a new world order!
      We finally returned to the "winter" time, now everything will trample! laughing

      R§S,Rѕ RїRѕR "SѓS ° RμS,SЃSЏ ‡ P - P 'P RѕSЃSЃRoRo P" RμS,RЅRμRμ RІSЂRμRјSЏ RІRїRμSЂRІS <Rμ ± F C <F "of the PS RІRІRμRґRμRЅRѕ RїRѕSЃS,R ° RЅRѕRІR" RμRЅRoRμRј R'SЂRμRјRμRЅRЅRѕRіRѕ RїSЂR ° RІRoS, RμR "SЊSЃS,RІR ° RѕS, 27 1917 RoSЋRЅSЏ RіRѕRґR ° RЅR ° RїRμSЂRoRѕRґ SЃ 1 RoSЋR" SЏ (RЅR 1 ° C ° F ‡ SЃ RІRїRμSЂS'Rґ) RїRѕ 31 ° F RІRіSѓSЃS,R 1917 °. RS,RoRј R¶Rμ RїRѕSЃS,R ° RЅRѕRІR "RμRЅRoRμRј RїR" P ° RЅRoSЂRѕRІR ° F "RѕSЃSЊ RІRІRμSЃS,Ro P" RμS,RЅRμRμ RІSЂRμRјSЏ Ryo PI SЃR "‰ RμRґSѓSЋS RμRј, 1918 RіRѕRґSѓ RЅR ° RїRμSЂRoRѕRґ SЃ 1 RјR ° SЂS, R ° РїРѕ 1 сентяР± СЂСЏ. РћРґРЅР ° РєРѕ стрелки С З Р ° СЃРѕРІ остР° Р» РёСЃСЊ РЅР ° Р »РµС‚нем времениммммамваЁЁРUMРUMРUMРіРіРіРіРіРUMРіРіРіРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUMРUM ¶РЅРѕ, Р ± С ‹Р» Рѕ СЃРІСЏР · Р ° РЅРѕ СЃ РїРѕР »РёС‚РёС З РµСЃРєРёРј РєСЂРёР · РёСЃРѕРј РІ стрР° РЅРµ.
      How did it end - VOSR, the people who were not sleeping enough swept away the "interim government"!

      4 C "RμRІSЂR ° F" SЏ 1991 RіRѕRґR ° RљR ° F ± RoRЅRμS, RјRoRЅRoSЃS,SЂRѕRІ RЎRЎRЎR RїRѕSЃS,R ° RЅRѕRІRoR "RѕS,RјRμRЅRoS,SЊ RґRμRєSЂRμS,RЅRѕRμ RІSЂRμRјSЏ SЃ RїRѕSЃR" RμRґRЅRμRіRѕ RІRѕSЃRєSЂRμSЃRμRЅRoSЏ RјR ° SЂS,R ° 1991, SЃRѕS ... СЂР ° РЅРёРІ РµР¶РµРіРѕРґРЅС ‹Р№ перевод стрел РѕРє РЅР ° Р »РµС‚нее время.
      R'RµСЃРЅРѕР№ стрелки С З Р ° СЃРѕРІ РЅРµ переводил РёСЃСЊ, Р ° осенью Р ± С ° Р ° Р °Р ° Р ° РUMР ° R СѓС З С'тР° того, С З С‚Рѕ РјРЅРѕРіРёРёРµ территории РІ 1-1957 РіРѕРґР ° С ... уже С „Р ° РєСРјРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёРёР RґRμRєSЂRμS,RЅS <R№ C ‡ R ° SЃV "RїRμSЂRμR№RґSЏ RЅR ° RoSЃRїRѕR" SЊR · RѕRІR ° RЅRoRμ RІSЂRμRјRμRЅRo SЃRѕSЃRμRґRЅRoS ... P · P ° ° RїR RґRЅS <C ... C ‡ ° SЃRѕRІS P <C ... RїRѕSЏSЃRѕRІ. RћSЃRμRЅSЊSЋ 1989 RЅR ° SЌS,RoS ... ... S,RμSЂSЂRoS,RѕSЂRoSЏS SѓSЃS,R ° RЅRѕRІRoR "RѕSЃSЊ RІSЂRμRјSЏ In" RїRѕSЏSЃRЅRѕRμ RјRoRЅSѓSЃ RѕRґRoRЅ ° C SЃV ‡ P "P ° C PI † RμR" RѕRј RїRѕ SЃS,SЂR ° RЅRμ In " Р · имне堻время РѕРєР ° Р · Р ° Р» РѕСЃСЊ СЃРґРІРёРЅСѓС‚С ‹Рј РЅР ° 1991 С З Р ° СЃ РЅР ° Р · Р ° Рґ.
      Чем РІСЃС 'Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅС ‡ РёР »РѕСЃСЊ - СЂР ° СЃРїР ° РґРѕРј РЎРЎРЎР!

      8 C "RμRІSЂR ° F" SЏ 2011 RїSЂRμR RoRґRμRЅS · P "RјRoS,SЂRoR№ RњRμRґRІRμRґRμRІ RѕR ± SЉSЏRІRoR" of the PS SЃRІRѕS'Rј SЂRμS € RμRЅRoRo RѕS,RјRμRЅRoS,SЊ RμR¶RμRіRѕRґRЅS <R№ RїRμSЂRμRІRѕRґ ° C ‡ P SЃRѕRІ, RЅR ° С ‡ РёРЅР ° СЏ СЃ РѕС‚РјРµРЅС ‹РІРѕР · РІСЂР ° тР° РЅР ° В“ Р · имнее ”время осенью 2011. R 'соответствии СЃ этим СЂРµС € ением Р ± С ‹Р» Рё подготовлены Рё РїСЂРёРЅРЅ¤ ° ° ° ° С RћR ± РёСЃС ‡ РёСЃР »РµРЅРёРё времении» Рё постР° РЅРѕРІР »РµРЅРёРµ РїСЂР ° вител ьттвР°. P> RμS,RЅRμRμ RІSЂRμRјSЏ RѕSЃS,R ° F "RѕSЃSЊ PI RєR ° C ‡ RμSЃS,RІRμ RїRѕSЃS,RѕSЏRЅRЅRѕ RґRμR№SЃS,RІSѓSЋS RμRіRѕ ‰ â €" RїRѕRІS,RѕSЂRoR "F ° C ° SЃSЊ SЃRoS,SѓR † RoSЏ 1930 ° RіRѕRґR . P 'S,RμSЂRјRoRЅR ° C ... RњRμR¶RґSѓRЅR ° SЂRѕRґRЅRѕR№ SЃRoSЃS,RμRјS <C ‡ ° SЃRѕRІS P <C ... RїRѕSЏSЃRѕRІ SЌS,Rѕ RѕR · RЅR ° C ‡ P ° P "of the PS, RєR ° Rє Ryo RїSЂRo RІRІRμRґRμRЅRoRo RґRμRєSЂRμS, RЅRѕRіRѕ RІSЂRμRјRμRЅRo, SѓSЃS,R ° RЅRѕRІR "RμRЅRoRμ PI SЂRμRіRoRѕRЅR ° C ... RѕS" Roes † Röhr ° F "SЊRЅRѕRіRѕ RІSЂRμRјRμRЅRo SЃRѕSЃRμRґRЅRμR№ RІRѕSЃS,RѕS RЅRѕR№ ‡ With ‡ R ° R · SЃRѕRІRѕR№ RѕRЅS <S,Rѕ RμSЃS,SЊ РёР · менение С З Р ° СЃРѕРІРѕР№ Р · РѕРЅС ‹.
      РЈРєР ° Р · Р ° РЅРЅР ° СЏ СЂРµС „РѕСЂРјР ° РЅРµ РЅР ° С € Р» Р ° поддержки Сѓ Р · РЅР ° С З РёС‚РµР »СЊРЅРѕР№ СЗеааааааЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁР°Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р ° Р R РѕСЃСЃРёРё.
      Чем РІСЃС 'Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅС ‡ РёР »РѕСЃСЊ - Р” митрий РђРЅР ° тоР»СЊРµРІРёС ‡ Р ± РсР» СЊС € Рµ РЅРµ РїСёРРР!

      R'S <RІRѕRґ - SЃRѕ RІSЂRμRјRμRЅRμRј From € SѓS,RєRo RїR "RѕS ... Ryo RЅRμ S,SЂRѕRіR ° R№S,Rμ RμRіRѕ Ryo P ± SѓRґRμS, RІR Rј SЃS ° ‡ ° F SЃS,SЊRμ! laughing
    23. +2
      27 October 2014 13: 07
      Dmitry Anatolyevich is the number 1 ultra-liberalist in our country and the main hidden enemy of GDP, who also suffers from liberalism.
    24. 0
      27 October 2014 13: 11
      In the early 90s, in the United States, Japan buys everything, this is revenge for the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Hollywood make a lot of films about the Japanese exciting business in the United States, the threat there is tough nut-1, the rising sun, and others ... The threat was over .. ., now the Chinese are direct, the North Koreans cannot ... smile
      Damn, they will be able to "outlive" everyone. Still, they live on a separate continent, this is not Eurasia where a lot of people have died in history, and yet the Eurasians are in the first place in coming up with ways to kill fellows, neighbors, etc.
    25. +1
      27 October 2014 14: 51
      Quote: atalef

      Do not read bedtime stories, look out the window
      Which China has overtaken the USA? Stop laughing.
      Who counts in absolute terms?
      So we get that it’s better to live in Russia than in Monaco (and that the GDP of Russia is much higher than the GDP of Monaco and Luxembourg and Sweden combined)
      There is one real figure - GDP per capita.
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA_%D1%81%D1%82%

      D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%BF%D0%BE_%D0%92%D0%92%D0%9F_(%D0%9F%D0%9F%D0%A1)_%D0%BD%D0

      %B0_%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%88%D1%83_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1

      % 8F
      Check out and understand where and who.

      Who are you telling this to? Here for a long time a good part of the contingent lives in the country of elves and dreams, never sobering from glass washing.
    26. Belbizback
      -1
      27 October 2014 16: 32
      These Western s are completely outdated .... They thought they would dictate their policies ???? They have already dictated it; now they will reckon with China, Russia and other countries. And then the red-bourgeois bastards are completely fucked up .... Diluted homosexual and think that this is how cool ...
      1. FordRUS
        0
        27 October 2014 16: 46
        Well, the Russians then take their politics, i.e. buy Pepsi and iPhones 7 isn't that right? And this is your patriots Russians ???
    27. FordRUS
      0
      27 October 2014 16: 45
      Live in peace, not fight each other.
    28. FordRUS
      0
      27 October 2014 17: 03
      with Chinese tanks ... guys, it's canned.
    29. 0
      27 October 2014 17: 48
      to 2050 year to the size of the first economy on the planet. That is, the country will overtake China. According to the Citi Group forecast, by this time India will become the largest economy in the world with GDP of 85 trillion. dollars. China in 2050 gross national product will make 80 trillion. US dollars will take third place - with GDP 39 trillions of dollars.
      I think by that time the world will forget what sharer...
      Perhaps something will be in the library of antiquity "wikipedia"
    30. Lyolik
      0
      27 October 2014 18: 16
      The table of contents of the article is interesting, The Chinese, Indians and Russian will create a new world order.
      So soon it will look different: ,, Russians, Chinese and Indians will create a new world order.
    31. +3
      27 October 2014 18: 18
      Comparing the development of the economy by PPP is certainly nice, but stupid. For the simple reason that money has different purchasing power, even in the same city. Let's say a two-room apartment in the center costs one price, on the outskirts it will cost much cheaper, and so in principle, for any goods. I wouldn’t bury the states, China is still rushing by inertia, but there’s already a slowdown, the reason is banal, the rising cost of labor, the Chinese no longer want to work for $ 10 for days, because American capital is starting to return to their homeland and to Mexico. Russia also becomes not interesting in this regard, the standard hours of Russian and American workers are almost equal, the difference is only $ 0,5 in favor of the latter, and 10 years ago the labor of a Russian worker was valued three times cheaper than American. ,, dollars, it seems that the Russian government does not share the opinion of many members of the forum in the near death, green, and recently increased the currency reserves of the camps by several billion dollars US government debt placed. Does this somehow not fit Putin’s anti-American rhetoric or is it just for domestic consumption?
    32. Olga Sinigrosova
      +1
      27 October 2014 18: 24
      It was immediately clear why the Americans, how they broke the chain. They are used to living easily and fairly, but under the new order they will have to work and comply. Their history of occurrence, as states and further actions prove that their economy has always been built on squeezing out others, pressure and destruction. Their policies and diplomats do not know how to negotiate. Now they will learn to persuade and ask.
      1. 0
        27 October 2014 18: 36
        Quote: Olga Sinigrosova
        It was immediately clear why the Americans, how they broke the chain. They are used to living easily and fairly, but under the new order they will have to work and comply.

        Have you been to America?
        I will tell you one thing
        God forbid you to dig in as much as they do and shake - do they correspond or not to new trends and desires of effective managers

        Quote: Olga Sinigrosova
        Their history of emergence, as states and further actions prove that their economy has always been built on squeezing out others, pressure and destruction

        At work, initiative and ingenuity.
        1. +1
          27 October 2014 19: 44
          Quote: atalef
          At work, initiative and ingenuity.


          On blackmail, racketeering, impudence, bribery with intimidation, in short, on their "exclusivity." laughing
    33. 0
      27 October 2014 20: 30
      Well, as they say, even Nostradamus once said ... wink
    34. 0
      27 October 2014 22: 19
      Quote: Motors1991
      Comparing the development of the economy by PPP is certainly nice, but stupid.


      Not that it would be completely stupid, just one-sided like that.

      Quote: Motors1991

      For the simple reason that money has different purchasing power, even in the same city. Let's say a two-room apartment in the center costs one price, on the outskirts it will cost much cheaper, and so in principle for any goods.


      This is not a different purchasing power, but just different products. 20 kilos of rotten apples versus 1 kg normal.

      Quote: Motors1991

      I wouldn’t bury the states, China is still rushing by inertia, but there’s already a slowdown, the reason is commonplace, the rising cost of labor, the Chinese no longer want to work for days at $ 10, because American capital is starting to return to their homeland and to Mexico.


      Sounds like the truth.

      Quote: Motors1991

      Russia also becomes not interesting in this regard, the standard hour of the Russian and American workers is almost equal, the difference is only $ 0,5 in favor of the latter, and 10 years ago the labor of the Russian worker was valued three times cheaper than the American.


      Is this from the point of view of the business and its total employee costs?

      Quote: Motors1991

      As for paper dollars, it seems that the Russian government does not share the opinion of many members of the forum regarding the near death of green, and has recently increased the foreign exchange reserves of the camps by several billion dollars of debt placed by the US government. Somehow it does not fit Putin’s anti-American rhetoric or is it just for domestic consumption?


      In fact, the wet dreams of members of the forum are not shared by objective reality. request
    35. 0
      28 October 2014 07: 02
      To the events in Hong Kong: I hope, faced with a repetition of the American production, he (China) will act on the principle that is now popular in the Russian part of the Internet: “if you want to review the results of the war, we can re-show these results,” and recall the events in Beijing on Tien An Mei Square. In my opinion, the figures from the State Department refresh the memory very well. It's time for our drivers to take an example from the actions of the Chinese! hi
    36. Ivan_Koloff
      0
      28 October 2014 13: 04
      [quote = Sensatus] Here one Swede considered (http://www.awarablogs.com/group/index.php?option=com_easyblog&view=entry&id=155) that if we exclude the growth of public and private debt, and take only the growth of real production , then over the past 8 years:
      - Russia grew by 147%
      - Europe fell by 30%
      - The USA fell by 54% !!!

      here it is the reason for the sanctions! and not the notorious dill
    37. 0
      28 October 2014 18: 51
      I would like to draw attention to one extremely important thing:
      all these predictions are made on the basis of reliable and clear facts, i.e. GDP level, economic growth, national budget, purchasing power per capita, etc. But in fact, today, for example, Russia is very much hampered by systemic defects that have been artificially implanted into our structure of statehood together with a constitution written under the dictation of our Western "friends." The situation is the same with China, India and other economic giants that do not belong to the "west".

      This fact is far from obvious. Many people know about him, but they do not undertake to build forecasts and analyzes on this. And what will happen, for example, if Russia suddenly takes the Central Bank to hell with a grandmother tomorrow, lowers interest rates to 2-3%, unbinds oil prices from dollars (the same story with gas), starts investing its reserves not in empty pieces of paper - state. bonds syshya, and in the real sectors of the economy, industrial complex, agriculture, etc. !!! ??? What will happen then?

      It seems to me that the results of any analysis, such as that described in this article, seem like a child's joke.
      Incidentally, Russia, with Putin in the voice, is moving towards this goal: to throw off the "shackles of capitalism and democracy." I think China, India will follow the same path as the former colonies de jure and the current de facto!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"